Revised Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) and Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) for EMIR FAQ

Similar documents
Regulatory Reporting Landscape

Questions and Answers

MiFID II. Overview: Transaction Reporting Riskcare Ltd. A Riskcare Service

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Meet your REMIT Responsibilities with Regis-TR s Added Value Reporting Services

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of XXX

NOTE on MIFID/MIFIR IMPLEMENTATION: DELAYS IN THE GO-LIVE DATE OF CERTAIN MIFID PROVISIONS

Regulators REALLY DO CARE about Trade Reporting Data Quality

ECB-PUBLIC OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. of 4 October 2017

Final Report Guidelines on CCP conflict of interest management

COMMUNICATION TO THE COMMISSION

Final Report Guidelines on EMIR Anti-Procyclicality Margin Measures for Central Counterparties

Consultation Paper. Draft Implementing Technical Standards

Consultation Paper Draft Guidelines on Anti-Procyclicality Margin Measures for Central Counterparties

Trade Repository Reporting

Guidelines Guidelines for the assessment of knowledge and competence

BVI`s response to the FSB consultation document on the proposed governance arrangements for the Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI)

Methodology for Mandatory Peer Reviews in relation to CCPs authorisation and supervision under EMIR

Client Alert. Meeting New OTC Swap Reconciliation Rules May Require Better Technology and Processes

9th PwC MiFID II Breakfast GO LIVE readiness survey & essentials

ESMA s supervision of credit rating agencies, trade repositories and monitoring of third country central counterparties

Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders

Post-Trading Consultative Working Group (PTCWG)

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX

Welcome to the Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) Webinar

Supervisory Convergence Work Programme 2017

JC May Joint Committee Final Report on guidelines for complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors

JC June Joint Committee Final Report on guidelines for complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors

EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards

CP ON DRAFT GL ON SUPPORT MEASURES EBA/CP/2014/17. 9 July Consultation Paper

The really useful service for your EMIR reporting.

Febeliec workshop: REMIT regulation

AMF Recommendation Pro forma financial information

Mr Andrew Claxton, All NEMOs Committee. Cc Mr Klaus-Dieter Borchardt Director, Internal Energy Market, DG ENER, European Commission

The accountability of the European Supervision Authorities towards stakeholders after the financial crisis

Final report Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR Australia

MiFID II Keynote Speech, PwC Breakfast Briefing MiFID II Are you Ready?

EMIR - The right time for your annual check up! Advisory & Consulting Services August 2015

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Martin Merlin Director of Regulation and Prudential Supervision of financial institutions (Dir D) DG FISMA. Rue de Spa 2 B 1000 Brussels, Belgium

AMF Position Compliance function requirements

COMMISSION OPINION. of

REGULATIONS AUDIT COMMITTEE ACCELL GROUP N.V.

Official Journal of the European Union REGULATIONS

Deputy John McGuinness, Chair Joint Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach Leinster House Dublin 2.

EBA/CP/2013/12 21 May Consultation Paper

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 26 November 2013 (OR. en) 16162/13 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0213 (COD)

ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY

2016 Work Programme. 29 January 2016 ESMA/2015/1475 rev.

Final report. Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines

(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVE 2014/55/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 on electronic invoicing in public procurement

ESMA s supervision of credit rating agencies, trade repositories and monitoring of third country central counterparties

Futures Industry Association IDX Conference, London

Worker involvement in the SE Negotiation non worker involvement in the SE Working Paper No. 3/

MiFID 2/MiFIR Articles relevant to article The top 10 things every investment banker should know about MiFID 2. EU Council MiFID 2 general approach

Proposal for the implementation of the authorised representative under Directive 2012/19/EU ( WEEE2 ) July 2013

INVITATION TO TENDER. SRB/NEG/1/2015

Regulatory update & key business challenges

Review of the European Supervisory Authorities

Final Report. Guidelines. on internal governance under Directive 2013/36/EU EBA/GL/2017/ September 2017

The EBA competence to deliver an opinion is based on the fifth subparagraph of Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.

ISDA Resolution Stay Jurisdictional Modular Protocol

Questions & Answers. on REMIT

FIJI ISLANDS PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS ACT 2006 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 - PRELIMINARY PART 2 - AUTHORISATION AND IMPLEMENTATION REGULATIONS

Consultation Paper. Draft Regulatory Technical Standards

EU General Data Protection Regulation in the digital age: Are you ready?

Best Practice Approach to Global Unique Trade Identifiers (UTI)

POLICY ON CONSULTATIONS IN THE FIELD OF SUPERVISION AND ENFORCEMENT. 1. Aim of this paper

Annual peer review of EU CCP supervision Supervisory activities on CCPs Default Management Procedures

EBA/CP/2015/ December Consultation Paper. Guidelines on ICAAP and ILAAP information collected for SREP purposes

EUROPEAN UNION. Strasbourg, 24 November 2010 (OR. en) 2010/0041 (COD) LEX 1160 PE-CONS 54/1/10 REV 1 STATIS 78 MAR 101 CODEC 1017

APES 305 TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT

on remuneration policies and practices related to the sale and provision of retail banking products and services

EBA/RTS/2017/ December Final Report. Draft regulatory technical standards. on central contact points under Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 5 October 2017 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

DECLARATION OF AUTHORITY. This DECLARATION OF AUTHORITY ( Declaration ) is a declaration and certification made on by and between the following:

on supervision of significant branches

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

Technical Release 02/ Irish Company Law Requirements: Audit Committees

REMUNERATION POLICY EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD ASSET MANAGEMENT (LUXEMBOURG)

Proposal for an Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory Transparency Register COM (2016) 627. European Parliament draft negotiating mandate

Operations and user manual for the REMIT REGISTER

Trax Report. Your Fast Track to European Regulatory Change. Comply with Confidence

CP ON GL ON MEASURES TO REDUCE OR REMOVE IMPEDIMENTS TO RESOLVABILITY EBA/CP/2014/15. 9 July Consultation Paper

Parliament of Romania Chamber of Deputies Committee for information technologies and communications

GUIDELINES ON MEASURES TO REDUCE OR REMOVE IMPEDIMENTS TO RESOLVABILITY EBA/GL/2014/ December Guidelines

Zurich, January Overview of MiFID II. Impacts on your business and operating model

KEY MESSAGES. The efficiency of the Hungarian payment system is continuously approaching the EU average.

VACANCY NOTICE. Policy Officer (SNE) (F/M) REF.: ESMA/2013/VAC47/SNE

Audit. Committee. Guide

National procedure for using Joint Implementation (JI) mechanism under Track I (National JI Track I Procedure)

International Standard on Auditing (UK) 220 (Revised June 2016)

GDPR APPLICABILITY TO EXPATRIATE EMPLOYEES

Template for comments

Briefing note. ESMA Q&A on MiFID II inducements rules (research) (Latest update by ESMA: 12 July 2018)

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE PROVISION OF CUSTOMS BROKERAGE SERVICES

European Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SINGLE RESOLUTION BOARD AND THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK IN RESPECT OF COOPERATION AND INFORMATION EXCHANGE

EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Transcription:

Revised Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) and Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) for EMIR FAQ

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CUSTOMERS OF REGIS-TR This document is the property of REGIS-TR. This document is provided for information purposes only. It does not constitute professional legal or operational advice. REGIS-TR does not guarantee that the information contained in this document is comprehensive, complete or accurate and disclaims liability for errors or omissions. You should seek appropriate professional advice where necessary before taking any action in order to assess your applicable obligations under EMIR. Author: REGIS-TR New RTS & ITS for EMIR FAQ Page 2 on 9

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 4 1 TIMING... 4 1.1 When will the revised RTS/ITS under EMIR be applicable?... 4 1.2 When will REGIS-TR Test environment be available as well as updated technical documentation?... 5 1.3 What is the revised back loading timeframe for terminated trades?... 5 2 REPORTING LOGIC... 5 2.1 What are the main changes imposed by the revised regulatory technical standards? 6 2.2 What are the main changes imposed by the revised implementing technical standards?... 6 2.3 Do I have to use a Legal Entity Identifier or am I still permitted to use an alternative code?... 6 3 REPORTING FIELDS AND DATA... 8 3.1 What will change in terms of reporting fields?... 8 4 MAIN CHALLENGES AND OPEN QUESTIONS... 8 4.1 What do we have to do with the data that has been reported as according to the current RTS/ITS?... 8 4.2 Is the use of the current reporting framework/ functionalities still allowed?... 8 4.3 What do the changes mean for market participants in terms of internal changes?... 8 Author: REGIS-TR New RTS & ITS for EMIR FAQ Page 3 on 9

Introduction In 2012, ESMA submitted its draft regulatory and implementing technical standards under EMIR to the Commission, which became the Regulation No. 148/2013 (RTS) and Regulation No. 1247/2012. The aim of the revised RTS/ITS under EMIR is now to address potential improvements and existing deficiencies that have been identified since the reporting start date of EMIR in February 2014. Over the last years, ESMA issued several versions of the EMIR Q&A documents to provide more guidelines in respect to Article 9 under EMIR. With the revised RTS/ITS those guidelines will become legally binding, serving to promote common supervisory approaches and practices in the application of EMIR. A final report for the revised EMIR RTS/ITS has been published by ESMA in November 2015. On 21 January 2017, the revised EMIR RTS/ITS (Delegated Regulation No.140/2017 and Implementing Regulation 105/2017 respectively) have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. 1 TIMING 1.1 When will the revised RTS/ITS under EMIR be applicable? Both the RTS and the ITS will apply as from 1 November 2017* with the exception of Article 1(5), which apply from 10 February 2017 1. According to Article 2, the regulation will enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication, was 10 February 2017. From that day on 9 months are provided to all market participants including Trade repositories to implement the changes provided under the revised RTS/ITS. *Please note that the date is subject to change as there are on-going discussions between TRs and ESMA in order to avoid a start in the middle of the week 1 See section 1.3 In article 5, paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: 4. The following derivative contracts which are not outstanding on the commencement date for reporting a particular derivative class shall be reported to a trade repository within five years of that date: a) Derivative contracts that were entered into before 16 August 2012 and were still outstanding on 16 August 2012; b) Derivative contracts that were entered into on or after 16 August 2012. Author: REGIS-TR New RTS & ITS for EMIR FAQ Page 4 on 9

1.2 When will REGIS-TR Test environment be available as well as updated technical documentation? A client test environment is estimated to be available in Q3 2017. REGIS-TR s objective is to make a UAT environment available as soon as possible to leave clients sufficient time to adapt their reporting to the new RTS and also REGIS-TR specifications. Furthermore, for those who want to migrate from another Trade Repository to REGIS-TR, sufficient time and support will be provided to do this in line with the revised specifications under EMIR. In addition to the above, it is worth to note that the current Level II validations will be updated and adapted to the new framework. This review is being performed by ESMA, in the last month ESMA has been discussing them with all the TRs. The final version of such validations will be published once ESMA authorize the TRs to do it, such authorization is expected to be done by the beginning of April 2017. Update of specifications and technical documentation cannot be precisely confirmed at the moment but will be communicated by REGIS-TR beginning Q2 2017. REGIS-TR will further support market participants with technical webinars, through user group meetings and through direct customer support. 1.3 What is the revised back loading timeframe for terminated trades? Counterparties may face significant difficulty in obtaining all of the relevant information with regard to trades that were terminated before the commencement date for reporting. Given the resulting complexity of reporting terminated trades and the fact that such trades do not increase systemic risk, the period for reporting terminated trades should be extended from 3 years to 5 years from the commencement date for reporting. Which means that the deadline for back loading will now be the 12 February 2019 instead of the 12 February 2017. Besides, according to the TR Question 4 on the Reporting of Outstanding Position in the context of the Backloading, it is mentioned that, For all ETD contracts concluded before the reporting start date, there is no need to report separately any life cycle events which occurred before the reporting date. The contract can be reported at position level in its final state or, for contracts which are still outstanding, its state at the time the report is submitted. Due to the number of questions received in regards to the backloading of ETD and due to the fact that a number of participants understood that there is nothing to report for ETDs, REGIS-TR is currently in discussion with ESMA to clarify this point. Author: REGIS-TR New RTS & ITS for EMIR FAQ Page 5 on 9

2 REPORTING LOGIC 2.1 What are the main changes imposed by the revised regulatory technical standards? -New rules on the reporting of a derivative contract composed of a combination of contracts. Counterparties should agree on the number of separate reports to be sent to a trade repository (with separate UTIs). The reports should be identified by using the new fields Complex Trade Component ID which will link the separate reports by a unique identifier. -New rules on the reporting of a previously reported contract which is subsequently cleared by a CCP -New rules for the reporting of collateral exchanged by the counterparties, specifying what exactly should be reported, by whom, and how it should be valued -New rules for the reporting of the notional amount for different classes of derivatives 2.2 What are the main changes imposed by the revised implementing technical standards? -New rules for clearly identifying the buyer and seller to the trade depending on the different asset classes -New criteria for the UTI generation in case of non-agreement between counterparties -Identification and classification of derivatives: the addition of swaptions and spread bets to the list of contract types, use of ISIN code ( International Securities Identification Number ) or AII code ( Alternative Instrument Identifier ) for the identification of derivatives -Clear rules about identifying the venue of execution 2.3 Do I have to use a Legal Entity Identifier or am I still permitted to use an alternative code? The use of a Legal Entity Identifier ( LEI ) will become mandatory with the application of the implementing regulation (EU) 2017/105. According to Article 1, a legal identifier should be used to identify: a. A submitting entity b. A broking entity c. A CCP d. A clearing member Author: REGIS-TR New RTS & ITS for EMIR FAQ Page 6 on 9

e. A counterparty which is a legal entity LEI may be used to identify (but not obliged to): a) A beneficiary Consequently, it is not allowed anymore to use less robust identifiers such as BIC or interim codes. Author: REGIS-TR New RTS & ITS for EMIR FAQ Page 7 on 9

3 REPORTING FIELDS AND DATA 3.1 What will change in terms of reporting fields? Significant increase in the data fields reportable under EMIR, especially in regards to the reporting of collateral and valuation. Under the revised RTS/ITS, it is also now required to report additional information on credit derivatives and interest rate derivatives. Furthermore, EMIR introduces an additional field Level to indicate whether the reporting is done on a trade level or a position level. Based on the legal texts, the current number of 85 fields will be increased to 129 fields in total (including counterparty, common and collateral data). However, this does not include a small number of REGIS-TR proprietary fields. More information on how the revised RTS/ITS will have to be reported to REGIS-TR, will be made available as soon as possible. Please also note, that certain fields have been erased or renamed to better reflect market practices. 4 MAIN CHALLENGES AND OPEN QUESTIONS 4.1 What do we have to do with the data that has been reported as according to the current RTS/ITS? Trade repositories will have to maintain different datasets under the same specification, and any update to the records related to the datasets will have to be done under the new specification. 4.2 Is the use of the current reporting framework/ functionalities still allowed? Clients have the obligation to report according to the revised RTS/ITS as soon as the regulation is applicable (1 November 2017). According to TR Question 44, all the reports submitted upon the application of the revised technical standards must be compliant with the new standards, irrespective of when the original trade was concluded. 4.3 What do the changes mean for market participants in terms of internal changes? The revised EMIR RTS/ITS represent significant changes for all market participants. Therefore, it is highly recommended to clients to do an internal analysis and assessment on their side, including a Author: REGIS-TR New RTS & ITS for EMIR FAQ Page 8 on 9

data mapping, reporting logic and field transformations exercises in order to include the newly introduced fields. The current reporting solutions of counterparties will need to be adapted according to the new specifications (additional fields, flows and validations). Author: REGIS-TR New RTS & ITS for EMIR FAQ Page 9 on 9