NUTRIENT REDUCTION THROUGH THE USE OF ADVANCED BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT RECOVERY. Rick Johnson Vice President, Market Development

Similar documents
Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua has Positive Long-Term Effects. Biological Help for the Human Race

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

DESIGNING LAGOON-BASED WWTP FOR <1 MG/ L AMMONIA (AND TN) IN <34 F WATER. Nick Janous Regional Manager

Upgrading Lagoons to Remove Ammonia, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus *nutrient removal in cold-climate lagoon systems

Stonecrest Estates Sewage Treatment Plant 2017 Annual Report

Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals

Phosphorus Recovery Focus Group. Tuesday, November 3, 2015 webmeeting

Feel free to contact me should you require any additional information regarding the report. I can be reached at

Tales from the Field: Troubleshooting Denitrification

Design, Construction and Startup of the First Enhanced Nutrient Removal Plant in Maryland Funded by the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund

Water Resources Director: Chris Graybeal

Overview of Supplemental Carbon Sources for Denitrification and Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

RE: Annual Report 2016 Wardsville Wastewater Treatment Plant and Collection System

East Coast P Removal Technology Performance Summary

CLEARAS WATER RECOVERY S ABNR SOLUTION PROVIDES WASTE- WATER FACILITIES WITH COST RECOVERY OPPORTUNITY WHEN ADDRESSING NUTRIENT DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS

CITY OF LONDON WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2013 ANNUAL REPORT ADELAIDE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Do You Know. Your Co$ts? Tom Stow Operations & Maintenance Division Manager Clean Water Services

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

Planning for the Future Battle Creek s Approach to Upgrading its Secondary Treatment Processes

Struvite recovery options in conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs)

Achieving Effluent Limits While Treating an Intermittently Deficient Wastewater MWEA September 27, 2018

EGANVILLE SEWAGE SYSTEM 2013 PERFORMANCE REPORT

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

Ballasted Activated Sludge Demonstration Study SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

Holistic Approach to Plant Optimization for Biosolids Management

Emerging Issues in the Water/Wastewater Industry. Austin s Full-Scale Step-BNR Demonstration

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

Effluent Treatment Alternatives

Arkansas Water Resources Center

Arkansas Water Resources Center

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Marc Nelson. L. Wade Cash. Keith Trost. Jennifer Purtle

by Keith Kennedy Manager of Environmental Programs North Central Texas Council of Governments

Pulp and Paper Mill Southeastern United States

Result data last updated. 10 July Map of Norske Skog Albury Paper Mills Environmental Protection Licence compliance monitoring sites

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

ArchaeaSolutions, Inc. Improved Wastewater Processing Driven by Arkea

Bruce Mines Lagoon Annual Operating Report

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

Biological Phosphorous Removal Is Coming! Michigan Water Environment Association Annual Conference, June 23, 2008; Boyne Falls MI

Iroquois Wastewater Treatment Plant 2016 Annual Performance Report

Watershed and Water Quality Modeling to Support TMDL Determinations Lake Oologah

75 th STREET WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADES PROJECT

Challenges in Wastewater Treatment and Management in Asia:

NALMS 2003 Protecting Our Lakes' Legacy

A Submerged Attached Growth Bioreactor (SAGB) And Membrane Filtration For Water Reuse

Introduction. Spokane River DO TMDL: Proposed Restrictions. Waste Load Allocation: Based on 50µg/l Total P - Seasonal (Mar Oct) for final TMDL

2017 Annual Performance Report

PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL: TREATMENT

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Increased Wastewater Strength in Arizona Recent Trends and Impacts to Facility Design

Rational IPP Permitting

Treatment Process Selection for Very Low

REUSE QUALITY EFFLUENT FROM RESTAURANT WASTEWATER James Bell 1, Chris Duhamel 2 and Sheryl Ervin 3

Arkansas Water Resources Center

Wastewater Systems. By Reza Shams-Khorzani, Ph.D. VP - Bio-Microbics, Inc. 9 th KWEA/KsAWWA Annual Joint Conference August 29, 2017 Wichita, Kansas

Jordan River TMDL Update

Global Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment

Arkansas Water Resources Center

Fond du Lac Low Level Phosphorus Efforts & SNRP Overview

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

ONSITE TREATMENT. Amphidrome

2012 Nutrient Regulations Update

Energy Savings Through Denitrification

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

MDEQ Observations on Sustainability

Wastewater Facility Plan City of Marshall, Minnesota

Masses at Massillon: IFAS for Industrial Loads and Nutrient Removal

So You ve Removed Your Phosphorus? Now What? JTAC Luncheon April 9 th, 2014

Irrigating Agricultural Crops with Treated Municipal Wastewater: Review of a Three Year Study and New Regulations in Delaware

Figure 1. Platte River Sub-Watersheds and Monitoring Locations.

Phosphorous Removal using Tertiary UF How Low Can You Go? and Other Design Considerations

Trials and Tribulations of Building a Pilot Plant:

Dawson City Wastewater

Membrane Bioreactor vs. Extended Aeration Treatment Pilot Study Effluent and Groundwater Quality Presenter Leslie Dumas

COMPARISION OF NSF ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EUROPEAN NORM STANDARDS. Sharon Steiner 1

The Development of Operational Tools for City-Wide Implementation of BNR in New York City. Sarah Galst, P.E. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.

Case Study. Biological Help for the Human Race. Industrial Wastewater Treatment at Eastern Seaboard Industrial Estate, Thailand.

Advanced Lagoon Treatment

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

This document can be made available in other accessible formats as soon as practicable and upon request. Staff Report. Infrastructure & Public Works

Containerized Ultrafiltration (UF) Water Treatment Plant

Treatment Optimization: What s

Rainbow Creek TMDL Monitoring Program Report for October 2016 through September 2017

Aquaculture Effluents and the Environment. CS Tucker, Mississippi State University

Operation & Maintenance of the Delphos MBR WWTP. Presenters: Scott Ellsworth, P.E. Keith Radick Floyd Browne Group Kim Riddell City of Delphos WWTP

Director of Operations and Compliance Report. October 17, Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5-Day (Avg lbs/day)

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

Collingwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Annual Compliance Report

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

Technical Memorandum. 201 N. Civic Drive, #115 Walnut Creek, CA Tel: Fax:

Saline Water - Considerations for Future Water Supply. Bruce Thomson Water Resources Program UNM

Technology for the Treatment/Reuse of Refinery Wastewater

Arkansas Water Resources Center

2015 Spring Conference

Case Study. Biological Help for the Human Race. Bathurst Municipal Wastewater Treatment Works, New South Wales, Australia.

TWO YEAR CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS) AT BROOMFIELD, CO WWTP West 124th Street Broomfield, CO 80020

Refractory Nitrogen Sampling Central Johnston County Regional WWTF Expansion. May 4, 2017

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua. Biological Help for the Human Race. Municipal Wastewater Bathurst Waste Water Treatment Works Australia.

Hydranautics Nitto DESIGN SOFTWARE and SUPPORTING TOOL

Council Meeting Post Point Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements March 15, By Ted Carlson PW Director

Transcription:

NUTRIENT REDUCTION THROUGH THE USE OF ADVANCED BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT RECOVERY Rick Johnson Vice President, Market Development 1

Agenda What is the trend Technology description Results Economics "Vision without action is a daydream. Action without vision is a nightmare -Japanese Proverb 2

State Nitrogen and Phosphorus Criteria Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Complete set of N and P criteria for all watertypes 2 or more watertypes with N and/or P criteria 1 watertype with N and/or P criteria Some waters with N and/or P criteria No N and/or P criteria Source: http://cfpub.epa.gov/wqsits/nnc-development/ 3

2016 (est) 1998 4

Percentage Numeric Criteria Trend: States & Territories Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 1998 2013 2016 est Level 5 4 4 5 Level 4 1 4 6 Level 3 2 4 4 Level 2 7 16 16 Level 1 42 28 25 5

0.04 0.10 0.075???? 0.02 6

The challenge: Reducing targeted nutrients in a cost effective manner Our solution: View algae as a process not a product Sustainable, advanced nutrient recovery o US Patent 8,101,080 The benefits: Best in Class performance No chemical sludge produced Sustainable Multi-generational, single technology CO 2 recycling & O 2 release Biomass co-product 7

CO2 MIX Algae Return NUTRIENT RECOVERY SEPARATION Pure oxygen Clean Water Algae Harvest 8

TP, mg/l 0.600 Controlled experiment: Nitrogen : Phosphorus relationship 0.500 Raw 0.400 0.300 Permeate 0.200 0.100 Target NH3 dosing 0.000 Date 9

Concentration, mg/l Multi constituent performance Municipal Summary Raw Treated 30.000 20.000 10.000 0.000 TP TN NH3 TKN BOD TSS Raw 2.247 16.706 4.167 10.904 27.000 15.487 Treated 0.028 6.872 0.210 1.578 4.000 0.609 Nutrient Recovery Test 10

Result, mg/l Membranes alone cannot remove dissolved phosphorus Influence of separation on phosphorus reduction 0.30 0.25 Run1 TP Ortho Run2 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 Raw Separation Permeate Raw Separation Permeate 11

Dissolved Oxygen, mg/l 14 12 Dissolved Oxygen Median of 1 minute recordings from 2.5 month component evaluation 10 8 6 4 2 0 3 year DMR average (ECHO) 5.2 Current DMR 11.75 ABNR 12

5 MGD Municipality Primarily residential 36,000 Residents TMDL: 0.075mg/L TP Municipal wastewater treatment Constituent Before After % Removal Total P (mg/l) 0.625 0.036 94.14% TSS (mg/l) 12.18 0.24 98.00% PCB (pg) 2141 144.1 93.00% 13

9/20/2010 9/21/2010 9/22/2010 9/23/2010 9/24/2010 9/25/2010 9/26/2010 9/27/2010 9/28/2010 9/29/2010 9/30/2010 10/1/2010 10/2/2010 10/3/2010 10/4/2010 10/5/2010 10/6/2010 10/7/2010 10/8/2010 10/9/2010 10/10/2010 10/11/2010 10/12/2010 10/13/2010 10/14/2010 10/15/2010 Total Phosphorus, mg/l CPF EFF Flow, mgd Second 21 day pilot: Average Raw TP: 0.151mg/L Average Permeate TP: 0.024mg/L 1.4 Post Falls Effluent AlgEvolve Effluent PF Flow, mgd 3.0 1.2 2.5 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 0.0 M Ts W Th F Sa Su M Ts W Th F Sa Su M Ts W Th F Sa Su M Ts W Th F 14

Results: Constituent Before After % Removal Total P (mg/l) 2.68 0.18 93.3% Ammonia (mg/l) 0.60 0.05 91.7% Total N (mg/l) 14.1 3.26 76.9%

3 MGD Pulp & Paper Process recycled paper 130 year old company TMDL: ~0.075mg/L TP Inland Empire Paper Company Results 16

Total Phosphorus, mg/l 2-Jun 9-Jun 16-Jun 23-Jun 30-Jun 7-Jul 14-Jul 21-Jul 28-Jul 4-Aug 11-Aug 18-Aug 25-Aug 1-Sep 8-Sep 15-Sep 22-Sep 29-Sep 6-Oct 13-Oct 20-Oct 27-Oct 3-Nov 10-Nov 17-Nov 24-Nov 1-Dec 8-Dec 15-Dec 22-Dec 29-Dec 5-Jan 12-Jan 19-Jan 26-Jan 2-Feb 9-Feb Average Raw TP: 0.126mg/L Average Permeate TP: 0.024mg/L 10 Total Phosphorus Trend Raw Treated Average Raw: 0.126mg/L Average Permeate: 0.024mg/L 1 0.1 Separation Technology Vendor performance evaluations 0.01 0.001 0.0001 17

45 MGD Municipality 250,000 residents Biosolids management for 14 communities Heavy Industrial Base (26 SIU s) Seasonal Permit: 0.1mg/L TP & 5.0mg/L TN 18

Average concentration, mg/l Total Phosphorus Raw Treated 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 Raw 0.366 0.155 0.182 0.33 Treated 0.020 0.005 0.029 0.038 19

TN, mg/l Additional nitrogen reduction Total Nitrogen response Raw Permeate 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Weekly period 20

10/31 11/2 11/5 11/8 11/11 11/14 11/17 11/20 12/9 12/12 12/15 12/18 1/13 1/16 1/19 1/22 1/25 1/28 1/31 2/21 2/24 2/27 3/8 3/11 3/15 3/18 3/21 3/24 3/27 5/14 5/17 5/20 5/23 5/26 6/3 6/6 6/9 6/12 mg/l P Average 3 rd party lab (TP) Feed: 0.285mg/L Permeate: 0.02mg/L 10.00 Total Phosphorus Feed and Permeate avg Feed Water TP avg Permeate TP 0.1 mg/l P Discharge Permit Feed Alpha Labs Permeate Alpha Labs City Water Baseline Hypo threshold study No light study 1.00 0.10 0.01 Permeate results below detection limit of hand held meter-results supplemented with 3 rd party lab results

Date COD, mg/l TOC, mg/l Feed Permeate Feed Permeate 3/19 26 24 4.86 4.81 3/20 35 24 5.17 4.62 5/18 20 20 6.54 5.91 5/25 26 20 6.91 2.5 6/4 28 20 5.94 5.86 Average 27.00 21.60 5.88 4.74 Reduction 20.0% 19.4% Numbers in red reported as Non Detect. Level of detection shown 22

23

10/30/2014 11/6/2014 11/13/2014 11/20/2014 11/27/2014 12/4/2014 12/11/2014 12/18/2014 12/25/2014 1/1/2015 1/8/2015 1/15/2015 1/22/2015 1/29/2015 2/5/2015 2/12/2015 2/19/2015 2/26/2015 Temperature, F Temperature influence Temperature, F Feed PBR Air Average 58.2 59.6 30.4 St Dev 2.63 2.54 11.14 Feed fluid temp Avg PBR fluid Avg Outsid Air Temp 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 24

Biomass Market Average Biomass characteristics N, % P2O5, % Potash, % Protein, % Fat, % Carb, % Average 4.4 1.7 0.6 30.3 3.1 32.4 Low 0.6 0.3 0.1 11.4 0.2 6.1 High 7.8 3.4 2.3 48.3 7.8 63.2 Sample size 25 25 25 18 18 18 Typical applications 5 Year TAM, $M Bio-plastics $478 - $638 Soil amendment / composting aid $71 - $94 Fuel source $2 - $3 Others In development Average of 25 municipal / industrial sources 25

20 year PW Breakeven point for low P reduction at Molar Ratio = 8 Break even technology comparison MBR + chem P ABNR $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $- 5 10 15 20 25 30 Molar ratio, FeCl3 26

Thank You Rick Johnson rjohnson@clearaswater.com 440.415.2151 27