FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. Al Malone 12 Pinedale Ave. Jamestown, MD MD GRID: 949,000 / 158,000 LOCATION

Similar documents
Forest Management Planning for Marketing Forest Products

American Tree Farm System Management Plan Template

Forest Stewardship Plan

Making a Plan for Your Woods

File Code: 1950 Date: December 7, Dear Friend of the Forest:

Managing Forested Wildlife Habitats

Developing forestry practices. Managing for Timber and Wildlife Diversity NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION PRE-HARVEST PLANNING:

Responsible Forest Management IS Wildlife Management

2.4 MANAGING FOR HIGH-VALUE TREES

Forest Characteristics. Integrating Forest Management and Wildlife. Effects of Silvicultural Practices. Management of Succession

(Draft) Addendum to 5-year Management Plan Mohican-Memorial State Forest

Forensic Forestry Reading the Land

Managing Lowcountry Forests for Wildlife

Principles of Forest Ecology and Management. Forensic Forestry Reading the Land. Jonathan Kays University of Maryland Extension

Chapter 1: Preparing a Woodland Stewardship Plan. What will you do with your woodland? Some landowners choose to let nature take its course.

Chapter 1: Preparing a Woodland Stewardship Plan

REFORESTATION AFTER HARVEST

2015 Wisconsin Envirothon KEY Forestry Exam

MANAGED FOREST LANDS STEWARDSHIP FORESTRY PLAN

The maps below show the location of the Macedonia Analysis Area and the compartments included in the AA.

EC Forestry for Wildlife Habitat Improvement

Timber Valuation Opinion

3/8/2015. What You Will Learn: Intermediate Use Areas: Considerations and Tools. Time line for Forestry Activities

Instructions for New Applicants to the Qualified Forest Program

SILVICULTURE SILVICULTURE 10/8/2018. Ecological forestry (Ecosystem management)

Cheat Mountain Wildlife Habitat Enhancement

A Pictorial Comparison of Seasonal Timing and Frequency of Prescribed Fire in Longleaf Pine Stands

PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY OWNER S COMMITMENT / CERTIFICATION FOREST PLAN

Summary of Management Recommendations

Production of High-Quality Timber Products Through Forest Management. Wayne K. Clatterbuck Forest Management & Silviculture UT Extension, Knoxville

FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN For the GLADDEN MEMORIAL WOODLAND

Forestry for Envirothoners

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, BARAGA MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, ESCANABA MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

Silviculture Art & science of establishing & tending trees & forests

Proposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015

Sustaining Northern Forests in the face of Climate Change

Rangeland and Oak Relationships 1

Wildlife Habitat as it relates to Forestry

The Hardwood Forests in Changing Times - Adapting to New Realities. Charlie Becker Utilization and Marketing Manager

MICHGIAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE DIVISION. Management Plan for the Halifax Grouse Enhanced Management Site

Many of Missouri s forest landowners are interested

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, ATLANTA MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

Chapter 11 B. Case study: Grouse Management at the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia

The Woods in Your Backyard: Learning to Create & Enhance Natural Areas Around Your Home

Two-Aged Stand Management in the Coast Range A. Grotta

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, ESCANABA MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatment Descriptions and Unit Specific Design Criteria

HARDWOOD NOTES. Wildlife Habitat Evaluation

Province Integrated Resource Management Project

Sandhills Pointing Breeds Club. Future Training Ground Development Plan Presentation May 2010

Managing Forests For Wildlife 3/13/2017 1

Softwood Lumber Supply

Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647

Income Potential from Indiana Woodlands

Wildlife Benefits of Managed Timber

WILDLIFE HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN

Stand Dynamics and Health. Helping Your Woods Grow. For most of us this is our goal. Traditional Land Knowledge. Forest Function and Wildlife Habitat

Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest

Spatial Analysis/EQIP Success Story

Maryland and Delaware Stumpage Price Report

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, BARAGA MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

Uneven-age Stand Management. a.k.a. Uneven-aged (Sized) Silviculture Walt Wintturi- Watershed to Wildlife

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, BARAGA MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

Simulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands

Proposed treatments of planted white pine in the Waynesville Watershed

Proposed Action Blue Spring West Project Conecuh National Forest

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, GRAYLING MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE

Principles of Wildlife Ecology & Management Maryland Woodland Stewards Training Workshop

S USTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE SM PROGRAM

A brief introduction to general terms and concepts related to the forestry learning objectives

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, BARAGA MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

Streamside zones, or riparian

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatments

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, GAYLORD MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

January Symptoms and Reporting Suspects

INTENSIVE GROUP SELECTION SILVICULTURE IN CENTRAL HARDWOODS AFTER 40 YEARS I. Leon S. Minckler 2

nventory and Ana ysis Unit's

Mechanical Site Preparation

ATTACHMENT 4: DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TYPES MESABI PROJECT

Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry 2017 SFI Forest Management Public Summary Audit Report

Principles of Wildlife Ecology & Management Maryland Woodland Stewards Training Workshop

NATURAL RESOURCES FOREST MANAGEMENT

Plantation Forestry: A Global Look

Silviculture Lab 5: Pine Silviculture & Natural Regen Page 1 of 6

NTRALHARDWOOD NOTES. Estimating Oak Growth and Yield. Managed Stand Yield. Individual Tree Growth and Yield Models

Shelterwood Method Characteristics

Telegraph Forest Management Project

Developing Wildlife-Friendly Pine Plantations

PENNSYLVANIA FOREST STEWARDSHIP PLAN March 2007

Appendix J. Forest Plan Amendments. Salvage Recovery Project

Trends in Silviculture in B.C. ( )

Restoring and Regenerating High Graded Forests. Jim Finley School of Forest Resources

Forest Management Planning. Gary Koplun Service Forester NYSDEC

1. Protect against wildfires 2. Enhance wildlife habitat 3. Protect watersheds 4. Restore plant communities. Ford Ridge Project Area (pre-treatment)

Nancy L. Young, Forester USAID/USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

What is Silviculture? Silvics + Culture

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, ROSCOMMON MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

FOREST STEWARDSHIP PLAN

Transcription:

FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR Al Malone 12 Pinedale Ave. Jamestown, MD 20305 MD GRID: 949,000 / 158,000 LOCATION Woods Road, approximately.5 miles from River Run Road IN ST. MARY S COUNTY ON 29.0 Acres Forest 2.8 Acres Open Land 31.8 Acres Total PREPARED BY: Michael J. Burns, Professional Forestry Services 2000 M St. NW; Suite 550 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 459-1702 email mburns@forestfoundation.org. August 26, 2011

INTRODUCTION/OVERVIEW This property is located off Woods Road in California, Maryland. The landowner s objectives are to manage the property to improve the wildlife habitat, to provide for forest products and to qualify for tax incentives. These objectives correspond to the Stewardship objectives of fish and wildlife (primary) and forest products (secondary). The forest is predominantly mixed hardwoods and a Virginia pine stand. The landowner can be reached at 202-765-3406. STAND NUMBER: 1 AREA ACRES: 13.2 STAND DESCRIPTION AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES DOMINANT OVERSTORY SPECIES: Virginia pine, red oak DOMINANT UNDERSTORY SPECIES: American holly, sweetgum TIMBER SIZE: sawtimber-pole AGE: uneven STOCKING: overstocked DESIRABLE TREES: 85% UNDESIRABLE TREES: 15% SITE GROWTH POTENTIAL: fair SOIL: Beltsville silt loam (B1B2) RECOMMENDATIONS/PRACTICES: This stand is comprised of sawtimber and pole size Virginia pine. The tree density (stocking) is high in relation to maintaining optimum growing space per tree. As trees in the stand continue to grow larger, growing space per tree will continue to decrease. In this "overstocked" condition the stand will become less vigorous due to excessive competition for limited resources such as soil nutrients, water, and sunlight. In this overstocked condition a stand is also vulnerable to insect and disease infestation as well as decline from drought.

An increment boring was taken from a 17.2 inch DBH, (diameter at breast height, 4.5 feet above ground) Virginia pine. It revealed that the tree is seventy four years old and has grown two inches in the last sixteen years. The tree species distribution in this stand is as follows: Virginia pine 39% Red oak 35% Yellow poplar 5% Big tooth Aspen 2% White oak 12% Sweetgum 5% Eastern red cedar 1% Loblolly pine 1% Total 100% The current size class distribution in this stand is 55% saw timber (11.0 inches or greater in dbh [dbh = diameter at breast height - e.g. the tree diameter measured at 4.5 feet, approximately breast height]); 37% pole size (5.0-10.9 inches dbh); and 8% small tree (sapling to 4.9 inches dbh). It usually takes about 45 to 50 years for Virginia pine to reach maturity. The Virginia pine is this stand is mature, and has been experiencing wind throw. When Virginia pine reaches maturity red heart disease also develops. Red heart disease (Fomes pini) causes a red stain in the wood of Virginia pine making it less valuable as a timber product and also weakens the stem. The best prescription for this stand is to perform a regeneration harvest by the clear cut method by June 2013. After the stand is harvested the site should be prepared for reforestation by prescribed burning and reforested with loblolly pine. The loblolly pine should be planted on a 7 x10 spacing (622 trees/acre). Seedlings for reforestation are available from the John S. Ayton State Forest Tree Nursery at cost to landowners. Before any timber is sold the landowner should contact a registered professional forester before any timber is sold. A registered professional forester should mark the boundaries of the sale and determine the volume of the wood to be removed. A list of Private Consultant Foresters is available from the local DNR-Forest Service office upon request. The Beltsville silt loam soils present in this stand is classified as a hydric soil, a possible indicator of additional non-tidal wetland areas. A hydric soil is a soil that, in it's undrained condition, is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to favor the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation. Timber harvesting in the wetland areas and areas with hydric soils present must include the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in order to minimize impact on the hydrology of these soils.

BMPs are easily implemented conservation measures that control soil loss and minimize potentially adverse impacts during harvesting to protect water quality. Best Management Practices are conservation measures that: * Control soil loss * Reduce water quality degradation * Maintain an area as a nontidal wetland after harvesting * Minimize any adverse impact to the chemical, physical or biological characteristics of nontidal wetlands. Additional information describing how to implement BMPs is attached at the end of this plan. The entire stand should be re-examined in 15 years (2026) to update the management recommendations. STAND DESCRIPTION AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES STAND NUMBER: 2 AREA ACRES: 15.8 DOMINANT OVERSTORY SPECIES: white oak, red oak DOMINANT UNDERSTORY SPECIES: American holly, sweetgum TIMBER SIZE: sawtimber AGE: even STOCKING: fully stocked DESIRABLE TREES: 85% UNDESIRABLE TREES: 15% SITE GROWTH POTENTIAL: good SOIL: Beltsville silt loam (B1B2) RECOMMENDATIONS/PRACTICES: This stand is comprised of sawtimber size white oak and red oak. The tree density (stocking) is adequate in relation to maintaining optimum growing space per tree. The tree species distribution in this stand is as follows:

White oak 60% Red oak 21% Yellow poplar 7% Sweetgum 2% Red Maple 10% Total 100% The current size class distribution in this stand is 62% saw timber (11.0 inches or greater in dbh [dbh = diameter at breast height - e.g. the tree diameter measured at 4.5 feet, approximately breast height]); 36% pole size (5.0-10.9 inches dbh); and 2% small tree (sapling to 4.9 inches dbh). The prescription for this stand is to let it develop naturally over the next ten years at which time it should be re-examined for the feasibility of a commercial thinning. The Beltsville silt loam soils present in this stand is classified as a hydric soil, a possible indicator of additional non-tidal wetland areas. A hydric soil is a soil that, in it's undrained condition, is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to favor the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation. Timber harvesting in the wetland areas and areas with hydric soils present must include the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in order to minimize impact on the hydrology of these soils. BMPs are easily implemented conservation measures that control soil loss and minimize potentially adverse impacts during harvesting to protect water quality. Best Management Practices are conservation measures that: * Control soil loss * Reduce water quality degradation * Maintain an area as a nontidal wetland after harvesting * Minimize any adverse impact to the chemical, physical or biological characteristics of nontidal wetlands. Additional information describing how to implement BMPs is attached at the end of this plan. The entire stand should be re-examined in 15 years (2026) to update the management recommendations. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1. Implementation of this Forest Stewardship Plan can be used to obtain a reduced (agricultural) property tax assessment. If so used, it should be realized that while the forestry office is available to assist you in implementing the plan, it is your responsibility to request assistance and make certain management activities are completed according to the written time schedule of the plan. The plan is written with the intent to give you a reasonable amount of time to complete the recommendations as given. Failure to follow the recommendations as given or to

keep current of the time schedule may result in the elimination of reduced tax benefits and/or tax penalties. You should work closely with the forestry office to make certain all practices are completed according to schedule and to keep your file updated. 2. For the timber harvesting recommended for your property, you should consider retaining a consulting forester to assist you. There are several good reasons for this. Nationwide, statistics show that landowners who retain a consulting forester receive about double the income from a forest harvest than landowners who do not retain a consulting forester. Additionally, hiring a consultant forester relieves you of worrying about all the details of a harvest, such as contracts, inspections, legal permits required, etc., which can be handled by the consulting forester. Most importantly, by hiring a forester to administer a harvest according to a management plan, you can be assured the condition of the woodland following the harvest will continue to be productive and valuable. You can contact the forestry office for a list of private consulting foresters licensed to practice forestry in Maryland. 3. Sediment and Erosion Control Permit is required before beginning any commercial harvest operation. 4. The term Natural Heritage is used to describe the plants, animals and natural ecosystems, which make up the landscapes of Maryland. The DNR-Natural Heritage Program maintains a database, which indicates your property does not provide habitat for rare and endangered plant species in need of conservation. Your property also provides important habitat for a group of bird species, which are considered in need of conservation. These groups of bird species are collectively called Forest Interior Dwelling Species (FIDS). More information on this species is provided at the end of this plan. This sheet also lists the general forest management practices, which should be utilized to help conserve FID Turkey: WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Turkeys may range up to 4000 acres daily. When an appropriate interspersion of habitats is available, they may confine their daily activity to 400-1000 acres. Prime range is characterized by a diversity of forest types and age classes, predominated by mature hardwoods, well interspersed with small openings and some cultivated land. Thus your property alone will not support turkeys. However, in conjunction with surrounding properties, all of the habitat requirements may be present. The following are recommendations for the forest on your property. A variety of mast producing trees should be maintained including oaks, beech, cherry and ash. Grape thickets, briar patches, spring seeps, and small streams should all be protected because of their value as sources of food during winter.

Grazing by deer should be kept at a level so that food-producing plants are not destroyed and there is minimal competition for mast. This may require harvesting deer on your property if population levels are too high in the area. Lastly, turkeys are very susceptible to human disturbances and disturbances from free ranging dogs. Therefore, every effort should be made to limit these disturbances. Rabbits: The cottontail rabbit is found throughout the state and is easily managed. They require good cover near food and a place to bear young. Home ranges of rabbits generally consist of 5 to 10 acres for males and 3 to 4 acres for females. They spend most of their life within 150 feet of dense brushy cover. Food supply for cottontails is generally adequate since they eat a great variety of plant foods. Rabbits need unmowed grass for nesting cover, grasses and legumes for food, dense brush and vines for escape cover and winter food. Planting clover plots or incorporating clover into the existing grass would be of help. Leaving uncut or overgrown brushy areas provide both escape and winter cover. The same browse areas created for deer also benefit rabbits. Since rabbits nest on the ground, the young are very vulnerable. Controlling stray cats will help greatly. Brush Piles: Brush piles can provide important escape cover for many small animals. Please refer to the enclosed reference material on how to build brush piles included with this plan. You could build several large brush piles along your woodland edge.

MANAGEMENT PRACTICE SCHEDULE Completion Date Practice Stand Acres June 2013 Regeneration Harvest 1 13.2 September 2013 Site Preparation 1 13.2 April 2014 Reforestation 1 13.2 Continuous Maintain Property 1-2 29.0 Boundaries Continuous Maintain Roads 1-2 29.0 and Trails Continuous Monitor for Insect 1-2 29.0 And Disease Problems August 2026 Re-examine to Update 1-2 29.0 Management Recommendations To provide you with further assistance in carrying out the recommended practices please contact Michael Burns, Professional Forestry Services, 2000 M St. NW Suite 550, Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 459-1702 email mburns@forestfoundation.org.