SOUTHWEST DIVISION Comparing Air Measurements and Modeling Results at a Residential Site Overlying a TCE Plume October 18, 2004

Similar documents
Case Study of Modeled and Observed TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air. Christopher G. Lawless Johnson Wright, Inc.

Eric M. Nichols, PE Amy Goldberg Day

Example Application of Long Term Stewardship for the Chlorinated Vapor Intrusion Pathway (and VOC sources)

A Rational Approach to Vapor Intrusion Preferential Pathways

Lessons from Large Groundwater Plume Sites Redfield and Wall

Case Study of TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air and the Effects of Ventilation on Entry Routes

Attenuation of Hydrocarbon Vapors from LNAPL Under Residential and Commercial/Industrial Buildings

Rapid, Efficient Delineation From VI Potential of A Large Soil Gas Plume Using HAPSITE and Other Lines of Evidence

Vadose Zone Profiling to Better Understand Processes

Balancing the Costs of Short-Term Cleanup and Long-Term Stewardship During Remedial Planning

Quantitative Decision Framework for Vapor Intrusion Evaluation in DoD Industrial Buildings - Based on an Empirical Database

Evaluation of VI Data Relative to Separation Distance Screening Criteria A Michigan Case Study

Mass Flux Characterization for Vapor Intrusion Assessment

TRANSPORT PATHWAY EVIDENCE OF A SEWER VAPOR. Findings from Work Performed at the Indianapolis USEPA Research Duplex

Navy VI Web Tool: A Systematic Approach for Assessing Strength of Evidence

Pennsylvania s Land Recycling Program. Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance

Oregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings

Armen Cleaners Indoor Air Quality Investigation. Jon Gulch, OSC U.S. EPA, Region V, ERB

THE STATUS OF VAPOR INTRUSION ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION IN OREGON

Background. NCP Early or Interim Actions 5/3/2017. Current Ohio EPA Response Action Levels and Time Frames for TCE at Vapor Intrusion Sites in Ohio

Vapor Intrusion in Massachusetts Gerard Martin

New Insights Into Exposure Through Preferential Pathway Vapor Migration

Corps Base Camp Lejeune: Utilizing the DoD Phased Approach to Prioritize Building Investigations

APPLICATION OF SUBSURFACE VAPOUR ASSESSMENT AT HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SITES

Proposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools)

New Data on Attenuation Coefficients for Crawl Spaces and Deep Soil Gas from the Lowry AFB Site, Denver, Colorado

RemTech Remediation Technologies Symposium

Temperature and Vapor Intrusion Evaluation

Fast-Track Vapor Intrusion Assessments Using HAPSITE Portable GC-MS

Evaluation of Spatial and Temporal Variability in VOC Concentrations at Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sites.

Use of Membrane Interface Probe and Passive Flux Meters for High Resolution Site Characterization and Measurement of Mass Flux/Discharge

Evaluating the Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Pathway

Updated J&E Model VIAModel.xls

An RT Regulatory Program Summary

Southern Cleaners & Laundry Jacksonville, North Carolina. CASE STUDY Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Evaluation and Risk Assessment

NJDEP VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE Ground Water Screening Levels: Default Values and Site-Specific Specific Evaluation

Lessons from Petroleum Hydrocarbon and Chlorinated Solvent Sites Extensively Monitored for Vapor Intrusion

Best management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions

Attenuation Factors for Hydrocarbons Associated With a Diesel Spill

Atlantic RBCA Guidance for Soil Vapour and Indoor Air Monitoring Assessments: Overview. December 7 th, 2006 Moncton, New Brunswick

Cost-Effective, Accurate Environmental Investigations Using Passive Soil Gas Sampling

August Vapor Intrusion Guidance FAQs

Steps in Conducting Structural Vapor Intrusion Potential Evaluations Under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch 13 February 2017

Mark Kelley Battelle Environmental Technology and Restoration

Proposed MCP Amendments

i-admin /15/14 2 of 3 Doc Type: Board Memo/Issue Statement

2. Appendix Y: Vapor Intrusion Modeling Requirements (Appendix to Statewide health standard VI guidance in the Technical Guidance Manual)

Site Closure Strategy for Contaminants in Fractured Crystalline Rock Air Force Plant 6, Marietta, GA

7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES

EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database

A Review of Preferential Pathway Case Studies: Lessons-Learned for Vapor Intrusion Site Assessment

Understanding VI Screening Levels

Empirical Data to Evaluate the Occurrence of Sub-slab O 2 Depletion Shadow at Petroleum Hydrocarbon- Impacted Vapor Intrusion Sites

PM STRAUSS & ASSOCIATES Energy and Environmental Consulting MEMORANDUM

May 5, Mr. Mostafa Mehran Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality 5301 Northshore Drive North Little Rock, Arkansas 72118

Developing a Site Characterization Plan

Establishing Critical Protective Concentration Levels (PCLs) for Lead-Affected Soils

EPA S 2015 vapor intrusion guides What do they mean for your facility?

Practical Aspects of VI Assessment for TCE. Acknowledgments and special thanks to:

Vapor Intrusion - Site Characterization and Screening. NEWMOA Workshop on Vapor Intrusion Chelmsford, MA April 12, 2006

Modeling the Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Revisions to the MCP GW-2 Groundwater Standards

Update - Vapor Intrusion and Mitigation in Florida

ESTCP Cost and Performance Report (ER-0423)

FACTS ABOUT: Vapor Intrusion

EPA Seeks Public Comments on Proposed Plan to Amend 1991 Cleanup Plan. vapor intrusion, and identifies and provides the rationale for EPA s

Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion

Screening Distances for Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Risk Assessment

LNAPL Recovery Using Vacuum Enhanced Technology. Theresa Ferguson, R.G. June 2014

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Hydrology:

REGULATORY-DIRECTED COMBINED REMEDY APPROACH FOR CHLORINATED VAPOR INTRUSION/MITIGATION AND GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION UNDER A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD

Vapor Intrusion from Subsurface to Indoor Air:

November 8, 2016 International Petroleum Environmental Conference. Tim Nickels Pastor, Behling & Wheeler, LLC

Vapor Intrusion into Large Buildings

Ensuring Occupational Worker Safety At Vapor Intrusion Sites

Establishing Contact

Risk-Based Clean-Up in Georgia Under the VRP Vapor Intrusion

Use of Crawl Space Sampling Data and Other Lines of Evidence for Evaluating Vapor Intrusion

Building Pressure Cycling for Vapor Intrusion Assessment

Vapor Intrusion Update: Separating the Environmental exposure from Indoor Air Quality Issues Guidance

INDOOR AIR INVESTIGATION

Indoor Air Study Data Summary and Analysis Report Main TCE Plume, OU5 Former Lowry Air Force Base Denver, Colorado

Removal of Perchloroethylene within a Silt Confining Layer Using Hydrogen Release Compound

Conceptual Site Model for Mercury Impacted Soil and Groundwater as a Tool for Effective Remediation

Thermal Remediation Services, Inc.

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Receive Site Fact Sheets by . See "For More Information" to Learn How.

IPEC Conference San Antonio, TX November 13, 2013 Glenn Nicholas Iosue

Characterizing TCE Exposure Distribution for Occupants of Houses with Basements

September Prasad Kakarla, PE. In-Situ Oxidative Technologies, Inc. Lawrenceville, NJ

DECISION DOCUMENT. Kent Avenue Station Site Voluntary Cleanup Program Brooklyn, Kings County Site No. V00732 October 2013

Design and Operation of Landfills

Rock Fill Layer Management and Maintenance Plan Former BNSF Site 13 Highway 99 Eugene, Oregon

Design of Below Sub-slab Vapour Management System for a Commercial Building

Expediting VI Assessments & Remedies with High Res Data

Remedial Methods for Mitigating Vapour Intrusion to High Density Urban Developments

DRAFT BUILDING SURVEY PLAN FOR VAPOR INTRUSION SAMPLING. Former Naval Air Station Moffett Field, California

LNAPL Volume and Mobility Estimation to Assess When to Stop Active Recovery. by Louis Sabourin, P.Eng. and David Tarnocai, P.Geo.

EKOS Oct 2010 COMBINING SOIL GAS SAMPLING AND MIP INVESTIGATION TO OPTIMIZE A DNAPL SOURCE ZONE CHARACTERIZATION

Use of Soil-Gas Data in Vapor Intrusion Decisions

Plume Cut-Off Treatment Example

Case Studies of Innovative Use of Tracers, Indicators and Field GC/MS for Assessing the Vapor Intrusion Pathway

Transcription:

SOUTHWEST DIVISION Comparing Air Measurements and Modeling Results at a Residential Site Overlying a TCE Plume October 18, 2004 Presented by: Wilson Doctor, Remedial Project Manager Ronald J. Marnicio, Ph.D., P.E., TetraTech FW, Inc.

Acknowledgements Base Realignment and Closure Program Management Office West 1230 Columbia Street, Suite 1100 San Diego, California 92101 US Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Co-Authors Dennis Goldman, Ph.D., RG Larry Dudus, RG 2 08/23/04 BCT

Presentation Outline Site Background Hydrogeologic Setting Original Vapor Migration and Intrusion Modeling Modeled and Measured Attenuation Coefficients Uncertainties Conclusions 3 08/23/04 BCT

Site Location Map 4 08/23/04 BCT

Site Background MCH part of the former NAS Moffett Field Orion Park Housing Area (OPHA) : 72 acres Previously agriculture or vacant land Housing construction from 1941-1982 Wescoat Housing Area (WHA) : 40 acres Previously vacant land Housing construction from 1933-1982 All but 1933 era housing demolished in 2004 Construction: slab-on-grade and crawl space 5 08/23/04 BCT

MCH Housing Area 6 08/23/04 BCT

Initial Investigations TCE detected in shallow groundwater in 1999/2000 at ~300 µg/l Investigated extent in 2002 taking 62 shallow groundwater samples Investigated vapor migration / intrusion potential in 2002 at 7 housing units Collected unit-specific data for modeling Collected indoor and outdoor air samples 7 08/23/04 BCT

Hydrogeologic Setting Coarse-grained sand and gravel channel deposits, incised in fine-grained floodplain and tidal deposits to 65 ft bgs Continuity of individual sand and and gravel layers limited Upper 3 to 5 layers comprise the A1 aquifer zone Upper 10 to 15 feet is unsaturated silts and clays First water encountered at depth ~15 ft bgs, confined 8 08/23/04 BCT

Simplified Geologic Cross Section 9 08/23/04 BCT

TCE Groundwater Contamination TCE Concentration Contours in the A1 Aquifer Zone 10 08/23/04 BCT

MCH VOC Plume 11 08/23/04 BCT

Regional Plume Map 12 08/23/04 BCT

Units Selected for Investigation Most locations over shallow groundwater plume Vacant, ground-floor units Building construction slab-on-grade and crawlspace 13 08/23/04 BCT

Building Construction 14 08/23/04 BCT

Original Vapor Intrusion Modeling J&E to model TCE attenuation coefficients at 7 units using 2000 guidance Site-specific parameters included: Groundwater Soil TCE Concentration Type Classification Soil/Groundwater Temperature Layer Thickness Depth to Water Table Dry Bulk Density Enclosed Space Total Porosity Floor/Foundation thickness Water-Filled Porosity Floor Length % Organic Carbon Floor Width/Height 15 08/23/04 BCT

Original Vapor Intrusion Modeling Recommended default parameters used were: physical- and chemical-specific properties linked to soil type soil-building pressure differential floor-wall seam crack width indoor air exchange rate 16 08/23/04 BCT

Additional Air Investigations Additional air samples collected in 11/03 and 5/04 to compare with original measurements and J&E model results 25 units, including original 7 units 24-hour air samples with Summa canisters Indoor air Breathing Zone Preferential Pathways Outdoor air (near indoor locations) TO-15 SIM, TCE MDL < 0.017 ug/m 3 2 sampling rounds per each event 17 08/23/04 BCT

Air Sampling Locations 11/2003 and 5/2004 18 08/23/04 BCT

Indoor Air TCE (ug/m 3 ) Location 18-Nov-03 25-Nov-03 07-May-04 14-May-04 619B 0.1 0.099 Not sampled Not sampled 620F 1 2 Not sampled Not sampled 703G 0.092 0.012 0.055 0.067 705F 0.07 0.19 0.054 0.071 720D 0.14 0.24 0.041 0.04 808A 0.18 0.11 0.036 0.058 819D 0.1 0.11 0.084 0.046 19 08/23/04 BCT

Comparison of Indoor and Outdoor TCE Concentrations 0.50 11/18/03 11/25/03 05/07/04 05/14/04 0.40 Outdoor Indoor TCE (ug/m 3 ) 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Rank Order Distribution of Indoor-Outdoor Air Measurement Pairings 20 08/23/04 BCT

Comparison of Model Runs Original J&E run vs. 2002 Draft Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance Updated 2002 defaults, full set of locationspecific inputs (Run A) Updated 2002 defaults, location-specific depth to water and soil parameters (Run B) Updated 2002 defaults, only locationspecific depth to water, slab-on-grade 21 08/23/04 BCT

Vapor Intrusion Modeling: Summary of Results TCE CONCENTRATIONS ATTENUATION COEFFICIENTS (unitless) Location Groundwater (µg/l) Source Vapor (µg/m3) Average Measured Indoor Air (µg/m3) Measured Original Run Run A [New Defaults] Run B [Min Location Specific Info] 2002 Vapor Intrusion Guidance (Slab-on- Grade) 619B 0.25 82 0.14 1.71E-03 3.45E-07 1.24E-06 1.88E-05 1.16E-05 620F 260 85,000 2.03 2.38E-05 3.02E-07 1.09E-06 1.88E-05 1.16E-05 703G 80 28,720 0.11 3.83E-06 3.45E-07 1.24E-06 1.88E-05 1.16E-05 705F 0.25 86 0.12 1.39E-03 5.87E-07 2.11E-06 1.89E-05 1.16E-05 720D 0.25 86 0.14 1.63E-03 2.80E-05 1.01E-04 1.88E-05 1.16E-05 808A 0.25 85 0.15 1.76E-03 1.08E-05 6.49E-06 1.97E-05 Crawl Space 819D 250 78,750 0.11 1.40E-06 3.61E-03 1.94E-05 7.67E-04 Crawl Space 22 08/23/04 BCT

Comparison of Modeled Attenuation Coefficients Run A ACs Comparisons: Order of magnitude larger than original J&E run (more TCE intrusion) Reflects greater net soil vapor flux and lower default building air exchange rate Order of magnitude smaller than 2002 Draft Guidance runs (less TCE intrusion) Reflects more soil vapor flow and less dilution in the space 23 08/23/04 BCT

Comparison of Modeled Attenuation Coefficients Run B ACs Comparisons: 2 orders of magnitude larger than original J&E run (more TCE intrusion) Reflects the effect of location-specific building parameters Similar to 2002 Draft Guidance runs 24 08/23/04 BCT

Measured Attenuation Coefficients Measured ACs Estimates: Source Vapor Concentration (SVC) (at soil/groundwater interface) calculated using unit-specific groundwater TCE concentration and temperature Used TCE groundwater MDL when no detection Measured indoor breathing zone TCE concentration divided by the SVC Assumes indoor air concentration due to vapor migration from groundwater 25 08/23/04 BCT

Uncertainties TCE detected in all air samples at similar concentrations (above-plume and off-plume) No significant vapor migration into indoor air from groundwater through preferential pathways TCE may be due to an urban society, regional TCE groundwater plumes, home products containing TCE, and/or construction materials 26 08/23/04 BCT

Uncertainties (cont d) Measured ACs may be related to ubiquitous nature of site TCE and not representative of vapor migration from underlying groundwater Comparisons of the measured ACs to modeled ACs may not be meaningful 27 08/23/04 BCT

Conclusions Vapor migration to indoor air pathway not dominant at MCH Explored relative impact of changing defaults (Run A) Explored relative impact of location-specific soil and building parameters (Run B and Guidance ) Illustrated limitations of using indoor air and groundwater measurement to AC construction 28 08/23/04 BCT

Conclusions (cont d) Comparison of measured and modeled results at MCH may not be meaningful Measurements and modeling important to drawing conclusions about the vapor intrusion pathways at a site Importance of gathering location-specific data to support modeling when site conditions differ from defaults 29 08/23/04 BCT