PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM THE AQMD I-710 AIR MONITORING STUDY

Similar documents
South Coast AQMD Air Quality Studies at Santa Monica Airport

Health Effects of Air Pollution

Mohsen Nazemi, P.E. Deputy Executive Officer South Coast Air Quality Management District

South Coast Air Quality Management District

So we know that there is an urgent need for mitigation for roads, ports, and rail roads how can we do it - now?

Dispersion Modeling for Mobile Source Applications

2017 Mobile Source Air Toxics Workshop

PM Distance Decay Evidence from CA. Zhu, et. al.

History and Control of Air Pollution in Los Angeles

Air Quality Monitoring Program at the Port of Los Angeles Year Twelve Data Summary May April 2017

South Coast Air Quality Management District Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA

Vegetation Influences on Near- Road Air Quality. Rich Baldauf U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2010 NTAQS Meeting Aug. 25, 2010 Boston, Mass

Air Quality Monitoring Program at the Port of Los Angeles Year Eleven Data Summary May April 2016

SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Final Methodology to Calculate Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 and PM 2.5 Significance Thresholds

Fine Particles in the Air

South Coast Air Quality Management District Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA (909)

Lecture 4 Air Pollution: Particulates METR113/ENVS113 SPRING 2011 MARCH 15, 2011

Twenty-Third Quarterly Report of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring at Sunshine Canyon Landfill and Van Gogh Elementary School

Clean Air Act History

Vehicle Emissions and Health: A Global Perspective on Effects, Placed in an Indian Context

Going One Step Beyond in North Denver

Environmental Improvement and Goods Movement in Los Angeles. Martin Wachs, Director Transportation, Space, & Technology Program, RAND Corporation

PORT OF LONG BEACH AIR QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM: SUMMARY REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 2009

2012 Air Quality Management Plan

How Urban Green Infrastructure Can Affect Air Pollution and Health

Presentation Overview

Implementation Issues for the PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM 2.5 NAAQS

THE IMPACT OF ROADSIDE BARRIERS ON NEAR-ROAD CONCENTRATIONS OF TRAFFIC RELATED POLLUTANTS Nico Schulte 1 and Akula Venkatram 1

Urban sustainability engineering

Twenty-Sixth Quarterly Report of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring at Sunshine Canyon Landfill and Van Gogh Elementary School

Evaluation of Air Quality Models with Near-Road Monitoring Data. Task 4: Data Exploration

Traffic-Related Air Pollution: A Moving Target

Community-Scale Air Toxics Monitoring Sun Valley Neighborhood and General Aviation Airports

Air Pollution Sources Overview. Amy Roberts, Division Manager January 24, 2019

The Air We Breathe. A report on Garfield County air quality monitoring results for

Air Quality in the San Joaquin Valley

Air quality in the vicinity of a governmental school in Kuwait

Progress Update and Discussion of Technical Memorandum 5b Draft Executive Summary Environmental and Community Impacts of Goods Movement.

Twenty-Seventh Quarterly Report of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring at Sunshine Canyon Landfill and Van Gogh Elementary School

Twenty-Eighth Quarterly Report of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring at Sunshine Canyon Landfill and Van Gogh Elementary School

Estimated Impacts From Idling Locomotives in the Borough of Raritan, N.J. February 2008

Air pollution is caused by high concentrations of gases and particles emitted form combustion sources (vehicles, power plants, industries)

GIS Project _San Pedro Bay Area Quality Analysis. The Port of Los Angeles (POLA) and the Port of Long Beach (POLB) have adopt San

Model Evaluation and SIP Modeling

SECTION 9.0 AIR QUALITY ELEMENT DRAFT COMPTON GENERAL PLAN Bus Stop. Metro Blue Line. 710 Freeway

Development And Application Of An Advanced Air Toxics Hybrid Photochemical Grid Modeling System

Near-Road Air Quality Monitoring and Modeling: Towards a Mechanistic Understanding

Air Quality Management (AQM) Clean Air Act (History, Objectives, NAAQS) Non-attainment regions

Regulatory and Voluntary Efforts in Addressing Particulate Matter and Black Carbon in the U.S UNECE/LRTAP/WGSR. Geneva. April 2013

Transportation Impacts on Air Quality

Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report APPENDIX R

Mobile Source Air Toxics Analysis for FHWA Projects

Environmental Management Measures Design for Reducing Vehicular Air Pollution in Dhaka City. Environmental Management

Assessing the Impact of Transportation Facilities on Ambient Air Toxics. Chad Bailey EPA OTAQ NTAQS

Chapter 3. Changes to Environmental Impacts of the Project

Freeway pollution travels farther than we thought. Here's how to protect yourself

Final Revisions to the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 )

Mobile Measurement Platform

Air Pollution and Health: County Public Health Department Perspectives and Actions

Mentor: William F. Hunt, Jr. Adjunct Professor. In this project our group set out to determine what effect, if any, an air monitor s distance

Spatial and temporal patterns in air pollution in Pittsburgh: Traffic and point sources

2012 Nitrogen Dioxide Summary

Gateway Cities Air Quality Action Plan FINAL REPORT

Evaluation of Low-cost Sensors for Measuring Gaseous and Particle Air Pollutants: Results from Two Years of Field and Laboratory Testing

The Health and Related Economic Benefits of Attaining Healthful Air in the San Joaquin Valley

Particulate Matter Rules Update BAAQMD BACWA Meeting

COMMUNITY AND PERSONAL EXPOSURES TO AIRBORNE CONTAMINANTS IN AN URBAN-INDUSTRIAL HOT SPOT

Air pollution health impact assessment: PM 2.5 exposures, sources and components

A. INTRODUCTION B. POLLUTANTS FOR ANALYSIS

Appendix B2. Air Dispersion Modeling

COMMENTS ON THE ADDITION OF THE PROPOSED I-70 EXPANSION PROJECT TO THE DENVER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN and TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Diesel health effects West Coast Collaborative Hawai'i Partners Meeting June 25, 2008

Assessment and Mitigation of Air Pollutant Health Effects from Intra-urban Roadways: Guidance for Land Use Planning and Environmental Review

Air Quality Analysis Report. Appendix H. Air Quality Analysis Report

Section 3.2 Air Quality, Meteorology, and Greenhouse Gases

Chapter 5 Economic and Environmental Issues and Constraints

Recommended Protocol for Evaluating the Location of Sensitive Land Uses Adjacent to Major Roadways

Meteorological Influences on Concentration of Airborne Particulate Matter in Ulsan, Korea

Fine Particulate Matter in the San Joaquin Valley: Introduction to Sources, Atmospheric Chemistry, and Transport

Air Quality. in San Diego Annual Report AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT C O U N T Y O F S A N D I E G O

Commanding Clean Air. The Clean Air Act of 1970 as a Model for U.S. Environmental Policy Clean Air Act

P OLICY UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA URBAN INITIATIVE. Road To An Unhealthy Future For Southern California s Children Andrea M.

Thirty-First Quarterly Report of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring at Sunshine Canyon Landfill and Van Gogh Elementary School

Quarterly Report STI QR. Prepared by

NO 2 Primary NAAQS Final Rulemaking

OUR NATION'S AIR STATUS AND TRENDS THROUGH 2015 WELCOME!

Profile of California Air Quality

Near-Road Monitoring Update. NACAA MSC Meeting December 2010

Human Health and Environmental Effects of the Clear Skies Initiative

10.0 Air Quality Introduction Current Use of Adjoining Properties Pollutants and Regulatory Setting

Impact of road traffic on air quality at two locations in Kuwait

Thirty-Fourth Quarterly Report of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring at Sunshine Canyon Landfill and Van Gogh Elementary School

Air Pollution in the Los Angeles Basin

Courtyard and Towneplace Suites Hotel Project Air Quality Study

Appendix C2 Dispersion Modeling of Criteria Pollutants for the Southern California International Gateway Project (Tables and figures in Appendix C2

Ozone 101. Maricopa County Air Quality Department. September 4, Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STATUS TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY

Applications and Implications: Science-Based Policy Formation at the California Air Resources Board

Intermodal Facility Study

Emissions Inventory (EI) James Payne Environmental Protection Department Morongo Band of Mission Indians

Transcription:

PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM THE AQMD I-710 AIR MONITORING STUDY Andrea Polidori, Ph.D. Air Quality Specialist AQMD Special Monitoring Group February 18, 2010 South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) 21865 Copley Dr, Diamond Bar, CA 91765

INTRODUCTION Over 35 million Americans live within 100 m of a major roadway (4 lanes or larger) Population living near Freeways in the South Coast Air Basin

INTRODUCTION Motor-vehicle emissions consist of a complex mixture of particulate and gaseous pollutants such as PM 2.5, UFP, metals, OC, BC, VOCs, NOx and CO Living near major roadways has been identified as a risk factor for respiratory and cardiovascular problems: o Asthma and allergic disease o Reduced lung function growth o Increased risk of adverse birth outcomes o Cardiac effects o Respiratory symptoms o Premature mortality o Lung cancer

I-405 Freeway I-405 Freeway PREVIOUS STUDIES Wind A7 Zhu et al., JAWMA, 2002 I-710 Freeway I-710 Freeway Zhu et al., Atm. Env., 2002

Slide 4 A7 Concentrations decay exponentially downwind of freeways. Primary emitted pollutants decay back to near-background levels within 150 to 300 meters, but depends on local conditions. Interaction of traffic, meteorology and air quality create a complex environment, not easy to define thresholds/critical values. Roadway design and roadside features influence concentrations and gradients Andrea, 10/29/2009

PREVIOUS STUDIES A8 Hu, et al., Atm. Env., 2009

Slide 5 A8 Meteorology Affects Fall-off Andrea, 10/29/2009

NEAR ROADWAY MONITORING OBJECTIVES Potential NAAQS implications (e.g. CO, NO 2, Pb, PM) Near roadway monitoring requirements Long-term trends to evaluate control strategies, fuel changes, freeway expansion Emission factor development and evaluation Monitoring data to evaluate dispersion models used for local assessments Environmental Impact Assessments (e.g. CEQA, NEPA) Urban and land-use planning Community-scale monitoring Evaluate exposures near transportation sources Support health studies Evaluate mitigation measures

STUDY DESIGN Two one - month intensives February - March 2009 (winter campaign) July - August 2009 (summer campaign) I-710 - three sites A2 Nearest downwind of freeway() Further downwind of freeway () Upwind/background () Measurements Continuous particle number (Ultrafines), BC, PM 2.5 mass, NO X, CO, A1 WS, WD, T and RH PM 10 mass, OC and EC (24-hr samples; 1-in-2 day) PM 2.5 mass (24-hr FRM samples; daily) TSP Lead (24-hr samples; 1-in-2 day) VOC Air Toxics (4 samples per day; 5am-9am, 9am-3pm, 3pm-7pm, 7pm-5am; 1-in-2 day)

Slide 7 A1 A2 Mention that we are still running BC and NOx at the 710 WEST site. Andrea, 10/29/2009 The I-710 is a 26m wide, eight-lane freeway connecting the ports complex of Long Beach and San Pedro to the shipping yards in East Los Angeles. The sampling site was located 15m downwind of the edge of the freeway and away from the influence of any other immediate PM sources, while the background site was set up about **Km upwind of the freeway. The majority of the freeway traffic is comprised of light-duty gasoline-powered cars and, typically, about 20% of the total number of vehicles is represented by heavyduty-diesel-powered trucks. Andrea, 10/29/2009

SAMPLING SITES 01/28/09 to 03/20/09 Near Site (15m) Far Site (80m) 07/10/09 to 08/19/09 710 Sites Site

PRELIMINARY RESULTS: PM2.5 and PM10

PRELIMINARY RESULTS: Lead (TSP)

PRELIMINARY RESULTS: VOCs 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 WINTER 05:00-09:00 0.55 0.27 09:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 19:00-05:00 1.08 1.06 0.87 0.75 0.62 0.46 0.41 0.31 0.38 0.31 Plot 1 0.0 Benzene (ppbv) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 SUMMER 05:00-09:00 09:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 19:00-05:00 0.29 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.15 Plot 1 0.0 Benzene (ppbv)

PRELIMINARY RESULTS: VOCs 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 WINTER 05:00-09:00 09:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 19:00-05:00 0.28 0.26 0.19 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.19 0.15 0.12 Plot 1 1,3-Butadiene (ppbv) 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 SUMMER 05:00-09:00 09:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 19:00-05:00 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.02 Plot 1 1,3-Butadiene (ppbv)

8 6 4 2 0 PRELIMINARY RESULTS: Black Carbon WINTER SUMMER 4.94 3.59 2.54 2.50 1.39 0.98 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 DEL AMO BC ( g/m 3 ) 8/3/09 0:00 8/3/09 12:00 8/4/09 0:00 8/4/09 12:00 8/5/09 0:00 8/5/09 12:00 8/6/09 0:00 8/6/09 12:00 8/7/09 0:00 8/7/09 12:00 BC (µg/m 3 ) 8/8/09 0:00 8/8/09 12:00 8/9/09 0:00

60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 PRELIMINARY RESULTS: Ultrafines WINTER SUMMER 40300 27500 14700 39300 25300 14200 140000 120000 DEL AMO 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 Ptcl # (#/cm 3 ) 7/27/09 0:00 7/27/09 12:00 7/28/09 0:00 7/28/09 12:00 7/29/09 0:00 7/29/09 12:00 7/30/09 0:00 7/30/09 12:00 7/31/09 0:00 7/31/09 12:00 Ptcl # (#/cm 3 ) 8/1/09 0:00 8/1/09 12:00 8/2/09 0:00

50 40 30 20 10 0 PRELIMINARY RESULTS: NO 2 WINTER SUMMER 120 37.2 32.3 28.0 22.4 17.9 10.9 100 80 60 40 20 0 NO2 (ppb) 8/2/09 0:00 8/2/09 12:00 8/3/09 0:00 8/3/09 12:00 8/4/09 0:00 8/4/09 12:00 NO2 (ppb) 8/5/09 0:00 8/5/09 12:00 8/6/09 0:00 8/6/09 12:00 8/7/09 0:00

EPA PROPOSED NO 2 NAAQS Current NAAQS (53 ppb; annual) New short-term NO 2 standard One-hour daily maximum 3-year average of 98 th percentile 100 ppb Requires monitors within 50 m of major roads (2013) 16

PRELIMINARY RESULTS: NO 2 1-hr Daily Maximum New Standard = 100 ppb LA CO = Compton Near site () = 53 ppb (arithmetic mean from 02/01/09 to 01/13/10) Current NAAQS = 53 ppb (annual arithmetic mean) CO DA 710 LB LB = Long Beach LA = Los Angeles 710 = Near and Far sites DA = 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2/1/09 3/1/09 4/1/09 5/1/09 6/1/09 7/1/09 8/1/09 9/1/09 10/1/09 11/1/09 12/1/09 1/1/10 NO 2 (1-hr daily max; ppb) Compton Long Beach Los Angeles 710 () 710 ()

PRELIMINARY RESULTS: Wind Effect (Black Carbon) SUMMER (all WDs; all WSs) SUMMER (270 0 <WD<310 0 ; WS>1 mph) Near site (15m) Far site (80m) Near site average = 2.30 (µg/m 3 ) Far site average = 1.39 (µg/m 3 ) average = 0.95 (µg/m 3 ) Near site / Far site ratio = 1.58 Near site average = 2.73 (µg/m 3 ) Far site average = 1.40 (µg/m 3 ) average = 0.52(µg/m 3 ) Near site / Far site ratio = 1.86

SUMMARY Emissions near () the I-710 were enriched in BC, ultrafine particles, and NO x Smaller effects on the concentrations of PM 2.5 mass and VOCs The 1-hr daily maximum NO 2 concentrations can be higher than the new NAAQS, but concentrations are mostly driven by regional levels BC and NO x are still being monitored at the Nearest Site (15m) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Philip M. Fine, Ph.D., Sumner Wilson, Michael Koch, Elizabeth Ayers, Paul Chavez, Richard Parent, Jorge Diaz and Paul Mayo (SCAQMD Special Monitoring); Don Jacobs, Don Kho, Terry Corcoran, David Sawyer and Jay Valle (SCAQMD Repair and Calibration); Rob Farber (Southern California Edison)