PREFERRED RESOURCES PILOT

Similar documents
SCE s Preferred Resources Pilot (PRP) Annual Progress Update

Southern California Edison Preferred Resources Pilot Portfolio Design Report Revision 2

Southern California Edison

Southern California Edison Preferred Resources Pilot. Portfolio Design Report Revision 0

Calculating a Dependable Solar. Generation Curve for. SCE s Preferred Resources Pilot


Preferred Resources Pilot Midyear Report

PG&E s Bidders Webinar

Distributed Energy Resource Management System (DERMS)

SCE s Experience In Energy Storage

2018 Oakland Clean Energy Initiative Request for Offers Q&A

UNDERSTANDING YOUR UTILITY PARTNERS UTILITY ENERGY EFFICIENCY DRIVERS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

LONG ISLAND LONG ISLAND

SCE Distributed Energy Resource Interconnection Map (DERiM)

Energy Efficiency Impact Study

All-Source Solicitation In Utility Procurement

Leading Insights into Solar

Stakeholder Engagement Session on Long-Term Load and DER Forecasting July 14, 2017

PREPARED FOR: ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE Updated Solar PV Value Report

From: Keith Casey, Vice President, Market and Infrastructure Development

Enabling Integration of Distributed Renewables - Program 174

Smart Grid and Climate Change

Renewable Energy in California Building Livable Communities: Creating Resilient and Sustainable Economies

Behind the Meter Energy Storage Applications & Solutions Design

CHAPTER 6 - Load Forecast & Resource Plan

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Distribution System Planning. Introduction and Overview Chris Villarreal <Month> <Day>, 2017

Irvine Ranch Water District Battery Energy Storage Program. Association of California Water Agencies November 30, 2016

Working Together to Manage Your Company s Energy Use.

Exhibit to Agenda Item #1a

2020 & 2024 Draft LCR Study Results for LA Basin and San Diego-Imperial Valley Areas

U.S. Perspectives on Combined Heat and Power Opportunities in the APEC Regions

Storage as a Transmission Asset:

MINIMIZING DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES (DER) ACQUISITION COST THROUGH AUCTIONS

NORTHWESTERN ENERGY 2018 ELECTRICITY RESOURCE PROCUREMENT PLAN STRAWMAN 1

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Capacity Performance FAQ Response

Modeling DER in Transmission Planning CAISO Experience

Joint Workshop on Multiple-Use Applications and Station Power for Energy Storage CPUC Rulemaking and CAISO ESDER 2 Stakeholder Initiative

Is the "duck curve" eroding the value of energy efficiency?

Locational Net Benefits Analysis Working Group Long Term Refinement Topics Scoping Document Prepared for the ICA Working Group by More Than Smart

Integrating Renewables and Distributed Energy Resources into California s Electricity Markets

Enabling the Internet of Energy through Network Optimized Distributed Energy Resources. ARPA-E NODES Program. TREIA Webinar June 28 th, 2016

DER: NYISO Operations Perspective

Roadmaps for Demand Response & Storage

Final Flexible Capacity Needs Assessment for 2019

Rhode Island Power Sector Transformation Performance Incentive Mechanisms Straw Proposal

2023 Local Capacity Technical Analysis

Non-Wires Alternatives Lessons and Insights from the Front Lines

Load Shift Working Group.

Disruptive Innovation

Harnessing Los Angeles s 5,000 megawatt solar roof potential for sustainable economic growth

Using Clean Energy to Reshape the Way We Generate, Distribute, and Consume Electricity

ISO Transmission Planning Process. Supplemental Sensitivity Analysis: Benefits Analysis of Large Energy Storage

SCE HOPPs Overview. Stakeholder Webinar, 7/14/16

California s Distributed Energy Resources Action Plan: Aligning Vision and Action May 3,

Energy Storage Buildings-to- Grid Applications

PASADENA WATER AND POWER MEMORANDUM. August 9, 2016

Evolution of the Grid in MISO Region. Jordan Bakke, David Duebner, Durgesh Manjure, Laura Rauch MIPSYCON November 7, 2017

CAISO s Plan for Integration of Renewable Resources

Bulk Energy Storage Resource Case Study Update with the 2016 LTPP Assumptions

Regional Resource Adequacy Stakeholder Meeting on Straw Proposal

Con Edison s Brooklyn Queens Demand Management Program

2016 Integrated Resource Plan Executive Summary

Economic Viability of Residential Microgrids in Ontario

Comments of Advanced Microgrid Solutions, SolarCity & Stem. Submitted by Company Date Submitted. Advanced Microgrid Solutions, Inc.

Renewable Auction Mechanism (RAM): New Procurement Tool for Distributed Renewable Generation National Summit on RPS

Dear Commissioner Peterman, Administrative Law Judge Miles, and the Parties to A :

Large Scale Solar Integration

Tucson Electric Power 2017 Integrated Resource Plan. Southern Arizona Regional Solar Partnership Jeff Yockey, PE

DER AND THE NON-WIRES SOLUTIONS OPPORTUNITY

Customer Targeting to Enhance Energy Efficiency Savings at the Meter

Solar Program Design Study

Flexible Resource Adequacy Criteria and Must-Offer Obligation

Using the Whole Toolbox: Integrating Demand-Side Potential Studies Presented at the 2017 ACEEE National Conference on Energy Efficiency as a Resource

Demand Side Management Programs. Chris Edge July 20, 2007

Presentation to Lafayette City Council. Amy Dao Community Energy Manager Jan. 26, 2015

Rooftop Solar and Energy Storage

Acreage Needed in 2050 for Renewable Generation to Meet California s GHG Emission Reduction Goals California Energy Commission May 9, 2011

REPORT. SoCalGas Demand Response: 2017/2018 Winter Load Impact Evaluation. August 14, Prepared for Southern California Gas Company

Energy Storage for Industrial Buildings. Ankush Halbe October 20 th 2016 NY-BEST Energy Storage Conference Syracuse, NY

PACIFICORP DEMAND-SIDE RESOURCE POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT FOR

Supporting Documentation A Changing Industry and Marketplace 0

Webinar: PG&E and Solar

California Distribution Resources Plan (R ) Integration Capacity Analysis Working Group Final ICA WG Long Term Refinements Report

ELL 2019 IRP Stakeholder Meeting 2

2012 Grid of the Future Symposium. Evolution of the US Power Grid and Market Operations through the next Decade

Impacts from Peak Load Reductions in Markets and Long-Range Planning

Customer Targeting for Residential Energy Efficiency Adam Scheer and Sam Borgeson

Distributed Generation in the Ontario Regulatory Context

MICROGRIDS: A GLOBAL VIEW

Self Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) Jason Legner Sr. Program Manager

Hydro One Experience with Renewable Distributed Generation & Advanced Distribution System Initiative

Memorandum. This memorandum requires Board action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

California s Energy Storage Mandate

Comments of Powerex Corp. on FRAC MOO Phase 2 Supplemental Issue Paper. Submitted by Company Date Submitted

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

What s Up in Hawaii? Pacific Northwest Demand Response Project February 25, 2015

Stakeholder Comments Template

Enrollment Update. Status Date: 6/4/18. Opt Out Channel CSR 41% IVR 28% Web 31%

Transcription:

PREFERRED RESOURCES PILOT Annual Update February 2018 Phase 1: Lay the Foundation Nov 13 2014 Overview Phase 2: Demo & Proof 2015 2018 (Milestone 1) Phase 3: Sustain 2018 2022 Southern California Edison s (SCE) Preferred Resources Pilot (PRP) is a multiyear study designed to determine whether clean distributed energy resources (DERs) can be acquired and deployed to offset the increasing customer demand for electricity in the central Orange County region. The primary driver for the PRP is to validate untested assumptions associated with the ability of a portfolio of DERs to satisfy local capacity requirements. The study timing (milestone 1) was expected to be completed three years in advance of retirement of the ocean-cooled power plants when, in 2020, there will be increased reliance on DERs to satisfy customer electrical demands. The PRP Milestone 1 report is now expected in the winter of 2018. Milestone 1 has the following objectives: Demonstrate the ability to acquire and deploy a mix of preferred resources to offset the increasing customer demand expected in 2022 in the PRP region (i.e., customers connected and served by the Johanna and Santiago substations). Measure the performance capabilities of the deployed resources to offset the increasing customer demand for electricity in the PRP region. Delays in DER deployment have significantly impacted the 2017 PRP demonstration milestone. Here is the current status: Acquisition Complete: acquired 256 MW of DERs. Deployment In Progress: deployed 74 MW of the acquired 256 MW of DERs. Operations In Progress: PRP resource testing will take place after additional resources are deployed; currently forecasted for completion in October 2018. Measurement In Progress: PRP DER portfolio performance assessment will be completed once additional contracted resources are deployed. SCE s PRP seeks to: Inform emerging modern grid standards with DERs performance data Demonstrate urban acquisition of DERs Provide insight about DER locational value Establish means to integrate and operationally manage DERs Facilitate customer choice of cleaner energy resources Highlights PRP RFO 2 cost recovery for the 105 MW of additional contracted DERs is pending CPUC approval Customer participation is key to meeting DER deployment target SCE completed a solar dependability study for use in estimating PRP region systems that do not have utility meters 1

PRP Acquisition PRP Acquisition activities are largely complete. Key 2017 items of note include: The acquired PRP DER portfolio that may serve the 2022 incremental forecasted peak along with the expected contributions of each DER is depicted in Figure 1, on page 3. In 2017, seven PRP RFO 2 contracts totaling 20 MW terminated due to contracts not receiving CPUC approval by a certain date. The terminated resources include five hybrid contracts at 2 MW each from NRG and two DR contracts at 8.5 MW and 1.5 MW each from NextEra. No additional PRP region-specific acquisition is needed. Any remaining need for DERs can be met through SCE s customer programs, natural customer DER adoption or contracted resources obtained through SCE s standard procurement programs. SCE is awaiting the CPUC decision regarding cost recovery for 105 MW of contracted preferred resources. The decision is forecasted for March 2018. PRP Deployment 86% of this year s 83 MW of expected DERs were deployed in 2017, mostly from SCE s customer programs. The majority of resources deployed to date continue to be programmatic energy efficiency (~28 MW) and customer-sited solar PV (~39 MW). These DERS are not designed to be dispatched or to deliver specific grid-level reduction/production. Table 1 on page 3 provides a detailed break down of resources acquired and deployed. Of the 32 MW 1 of contracted DERs expected in 2017, only 2 MW were deployed. An additional ~40 MW of contracted DERs are expected by the start of Q4 2018, totaling ~133 MW of DERs deployed. These additional 40 MW will provide a sample of grid-level measurement data to support SCE s PRP 2018 milestone reporting. Finding the Turning Point for Higher Customer DER Adoption Based on feedback from DER developers, challenges to deploying customer-sited DERs in localized areas, like the PRP region, include: Customers Finite customer pool Viability/Eligibility Business operations that do not match contract delivery specifications Customers unable to meet developer s credit eligibility criteria Customer sites do not contain available footprint to install DERs (e.g., storage, solar) Customers lacking site ownership or have short-term leases. Most leases are 5 years or less. As a result, these customers are less likely to enter into a 15-year contractual commitment with DER developers. Conversion Rate: Working through a finite customer pool, filtering through customers to identify a realistic set of potential customers and applying a conversion rate even at a conservative level substantially shrinks the achievable potential, which may lead to some behind-the-meter contracts not coming to fruition. Take Away: Limit the number of developers with similar product offerings targeting the same customers during the selection process, allow for dual participation with proper controls to protect from paying twice for resources, allow time for developers to complete a bottoms-up market analysis. 2 1. As indicated in SCE s PRP 2016 annual update. At page 6.

2017 Preferred Resources Pilot Annual Status Update MW 250 Figure 1 Acquired PRP Preferred Resources Hypothetically Operated to Serve the 2022 Forecasted Load DG DR EE ES PLS Combined MW Need 233 235 200 203 208 150 158 133 100 50 0 103 68 55 37 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Hour of the Day 15 Table 1 PRP Preferred Resources Portfolio Summary Resource Acquired 2 Energy Efficiency (EE) and Permanent Load Shift (PLS) Deployed Through 2017 Incremental Projected Deployment 2018 2019 2020 75 29 25 14 8 SCE Programs 27 28 0 0 0 Onsite Energy Corp (LCR) 3 0 2 1 0 Sterling Analytics (LCR) 8 0 6 2 0 Generate Evaporcool 6 1 5 0 0 NRG-L (LCR) 5 0 5 0 0 NRG SPV 1 - PLS (LCR) 26 0 8 10 8 Demand Response (DR) 63 3 15 25 20 Stem (LCR) 8 1 5 2 0 Macquarie (LCR) 10 2 8 0 0 Advanced Microgrid Solutions ( AMS PRP RFO 2) 40 0 0 20 20 Swell (PRP RFO 2) 5 0 2 3 0 Distributed Generation (DG) 3 51 39 12 0 0 SCE Program/Tariff 39 39 0 0 0 SunPower (LCR) 12 0 12 0 0 Energy Storage (ES) 67 3 4 35 25 SCE Program/Tariff 1 1 0 0 0 esvolta (ACES) 2 2 0 0 0 Convergent (PRP RFO 2) 35 0 0 35 0 Hecate (PRP RFO 2) 15 0 0 0 15 NextEra (PRP RFO 2) 10 0 0 0 10 SCE Utility Owned or Other Project Related 4 0 4 0 0 Hybrids (PV & ES) 0 0 0 0 0 SCE Program/Tariff 0 0 0 0 0 Totals: 256 74 56 73 53 2. The Acquired totals represent the MW expected by YE 2020, rounded to the nearest whole number. 3. The DG number does not include a non-sce 19.6 MW biogas-fueled resource connected at the Santiago substation. 3

PRP Measurement SCE plans to assess the deployed DERs performance capabilities in terms of offsetting the increasing customer demand for electricity in the PRP region. The approach and status of this effort is summarized below. Resource Type Acquisition Type How When DR SCE s Base Interruptible Program (BIP) Apply 10/10 Baseline: Industry standard of calculating baseline using the past 10 similar days Contracted DR DG-PV SCE Programs/NEM Tariff Estimate production based on nameplate values and expected locational hourly production (EE) - traditional or through PLS SCE Programs Contracted EE Contracted PLS Compare subset of customer energy usage before and after Energy Efficiency Measure installation Compare customer energy usage before and after Efficiency Measure installation In-Test Contracted In-Front of the Meter ES Utilize actual KW (charge and discharge) from Seller/ Performance Data Provider ES SCE-Owned ES Measurement approach for data capture and storage is under development Apr 2018 Customer-Owned (Behind the Meter) ES TBD: Pending results of customer energy storage use study (see below) Fall 2018 Obtaining Inverter-based DER Performance Data Accessibility to DER performance data is limited. While today s DER inverters located at a customer s site can provide production data for solar and energy storage systems, this data is not required to be shared with utilities. SCE can approximate the production data based on the solar system information provided during interconnection. For energy storage, SCE is working with Advanced Microgrid Solutions (AMS) on a Customer Energy Storage Use Study. The goal is to better understand the customer energy storage use patterns to inform related industry policies and utility distribution planning efforts. In the study, use cases will be tested. For example, one use case involves systems that may be used to manage customer demand charges in addition to providing a utility requested Demand Response function. Insights from the study will be included in the PRP Milestone Report. 4

Summary of 2017 DER Performance 2017 Preferred Resources Pilot Annual Status Update Demand Response: SCE s Base Interruptible Program was not dispatched on any of the 2017 PRP region peak days, but when dispatched delivered 13.17 MW of load reduction over a 2.25 hour dispatch period. This is a decrease to load reduction achieved in 2016 and is due to a slight decrease in participating customers and dispatched hours. Additionally, one resource contracted for 0.86 MW was dispatched on 5 peak days during 5 pm to 7 pm, supplying an hourly average of 1.51 MW. Persistent over-performance by this DR contract is not expected. Distributed Generation - Solar: Deployed Solar delivered peak output in the PRP region between 11:00 am to 1:00 pm. Since most of the systems are not metered, SCE developed an estimating approach for assessing DG-PV output as part of a solar dependability study. Energy Efficiency: 1,650 non-residential, EE Program customers, demand was assessed by comparing similar peak periods of recorded usage pre and post EE installation. 4 Using this comparison, the sampled group produced about 2.5 MW of hourly reduction between 3 pm and 5 pm. Based on these results, it may not be possible to fully determine the energy efficiency upgrades grid-level demand reduction impact. Further, load growth in the PRP region, while still positive, is less than previous forecasts. More than 28 MW of energy efficiency upgrades were installed in the PRP region and these upgrades are likely contributing to the decreased load growth. Energy Storage: One contracted energy storage resource is deployed and delivered, on the peak days, an average hourly output of 0.58 MW and a maximum hourly output of 1.68 MW. Portfolio Contribution to Serving the PRP Region Load Figure 2 - Assessed DER performance (bars) and the customer demand (line) above the baseline value of 971 MW SCE, through the PRP, seeks to validate the availability and performance of a DER portfolio within the PRP region by assessing its energy generation and grid load reduction. SCE forecasts that in the year 2020 there may be 20 days above the region s 2013 consumption based on load growth. As part of PRP Milestone 1, SCE will assess DER delivery amounts on the 10 highest demand days of 2018. To illustrate this approach, Figure 2 (above) represents customer demand (usage) above a baseline value from 10 am to 3 pm. For illustration purposes, on August 3, the portfolio of DERs deployed to date completely offset two hours. Since only a portion of the PRP DER portfolio is deployed, the deployed DERs did not fill the customers demand for the remaining hours for either day. The predominant offset for both days was DG (BTM-Solar); 56% total at its maximum hourly contribution. The second largest contributor was by DG-Combined Heat and Power (CHP), whose delivery was consistent across all hours; 28% total at maximum hourly contribution. Notably, although this DG-CHP is not contracted by SCE or under the control of SCE, it can be used to offset load. As more contracted DERs come on-line, SCE will continue to validate their performance capabilities and report the conclusions in the PRP Milestone report later in 2018. 4. Pre-installation periods utilized were not meant to duplicate actual peak but only similar peak conditions. The goal in doing this is to ascertain reliably-likely reduction at peak rather than maximum possible reduction associated with any EE measure. 5

Outreach Measurement Deployment Design & Acquisition Preferred Resources Pilot Progress at a Glance Phase 1: Lay the Foundation Nov 13 2014 Phase 2: Demonstration and Proof 2015 2018 Phase 3: Sustainability & Close-out 2018 2022 Design & Acquire Developed portfolio design process Issued 2014 PRP Portfolio Design Report Contracted for 78 MW of resources out of the LCR RFO Leveraged the scope of EPIC Integrate Grid Project to support the PRP in designing systems to monitor and operate DERs in concert Issued updated PRP 2015 & 16 Portfolio Design Report Contract for future PR PRP RFO 2-125 MW Aliso Canyon RFO 2 MW 276 total MW acquired ( 14-YTD) that is capable of delivering 227 peak MW Developed contract provisions in PRP RFO 2 in anticipation of evolving grid needs Develop sustaining processes that are informed by preferred resource measurement and analysis in areas of Design and acquisition Interconnection Distribution Planning Grid operations Deploy Increased energy efficiency program participation in 2013-2014 through enhanced customer outreach Deployed: - 9 MW EE from SCE programs - 5.51 MW solar from SCE programs Sited EPIC Integrated Grid project in PRP region to determine ways to optimize the operation of the grid with a higher penetration of DERs Deployment progress 2014 through 2017: 28 MW EE from SCE programs 1 MW of contracted EE (LCR) 26.5 5 MW DR from SCE programs 3 MW of contracted DR (LCR) 39 MW solar DG from SCE programs 1 MW ES from SCE programs 2 MW of contracted ES (AC) 46 MW of contracted EE/PLS (LCR) 60 MW of contracted DR (LCR/PRP RFO 2) 60 MW of contracted ES (PRP RFO 2) 12 MW of contracted DG (LCR) 4 MW of SCE owned ES Terminated Contracts 10 MW of contract DR (PRP RFO 2) 10 MW of contracted hybrids ES/DG (PRP RFO 2) Measure Developed measurement process for SCE solar and DR acquired through SCE programs Implement measurement process for Contracted solar Contracted DR Contracted ES Contracted EE/PLS Implement EE measurement testing Implement Customer ES Use Study Outreach Engaged in two-way information sharing sessions (e.g., one on ones, forums) with PRP Stakeholders Published 2014 Annual Report Continued engagement in 2-way information sharing sessions with PRP Stakeholders Published 2015 Mid-Year and 2015-2017 Annual Report Continue engagement with PRP Stakeholders Publish YE 2018 Milestone report - Complete - In progress at YE 2017 - Planned post 2017 Terminated 5 - DR numbers from SCE programs renew each year and are not counted in the 2022 acquisition total. For more information about SCE s PRP visit: http://on.sce.com/preferredresources Please send your comments to: preferredresources@sce.com 6