AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC2 Reinforced Concrete Slab Example

Similar documents
AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example

Elevation. Typical Section

Prestressed Concrete Structure Tutorial

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example

AASHTOWare BrD/BrR Prestress Tutorial 1 Simple Span Prestressed I Beam Example

AASHTOWare BrDR Prestressed Concrete Bridge Tutorial PS15 - Two Span PS Adjacent Box With Straight Strands

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

Prestress Superstructure Tutorial

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Steel Tutorial Steel Plate Girder Using LRFR Engine

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Feature Tutorial 2016 BrDR User Requested Enhancements

MDOT Camelback Bridge Example

AASHTOWare BrDR D FEM Analysis Tutorial. Curved Steel Multi-Span 3D Example

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8 Substructure Tutorial Solid Shaft Pier Example

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Feature Tutorial ADJ1 Analysis with Routine Traffic in Adjacent Lane

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL9 Curved Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.5)

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.4)

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8 Substructure Tutorial Modify Footing Example

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Prestressed Concrete Design Tool Getting Started

Slab Bridge Designer 2.1 Help: Example Analysis

Substructure Tutorial

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8 Substructure Tutorial Pier Drilled Shaft Example

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

T4 Floor Truss Example. AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Truss Tutorial

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 3D FEM Analysis Tutorial Steel Diaphragm and Lateral Bracing Specification Checking Example

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR ONE-WAY SLAB 1

ADAPT Floor Pro 2009/2010 Tutorial Export Design Strip to ADAPT PT or ADAPT RC

ADAPT-PT 2010 Tutorial Idealization of Design Strip in ADAPT-PT

How Loads Are Distributed

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8. Truss Tutorial. T5 - Truss Enhancements

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR BEAM FRAME 1

ADAPT-Floor Pro 2009 Tutorial Export Design Strip to ADAPT-PT or ADAPT-RC

For Two Steel Bridges

ADAPT-PT 2012 GETTING STARTED GUIDE

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR A NON-PRISMATIC SLAB 1

ADAPT-PT 2010 GETTING STARTED GUIDE

V Slab Bridge Design Software, Version 4.0 Superstructure Design Check

Diaphragm wall with tieback supports (English units)

TxDOT Superheavy Bridge Report Requirements. Bridge Division

PENNDOT e-notification

Cantilever diaphragm wall (English units)

CE 4460 Bridge Project Spring By: Megan Allain Bryan Beyer Paul Kocke Anna Wheeler

Hand Calculation Examples. CG Gilbertson

Design and Rating of Steel Bridges

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS12 - Three Span Prestressed I Beam Stirrup Design Example

Chapter 13 Bridge Load Rating

Top down excavation between diaphragm (slurry) walls with slabs (SI units)

UTrAp 2.0. Analysis of Steel Box Girders during Construction. developed at. The University of Texas at Austin

JULY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1

Dead man sheet pile wall (SI units)

Parapet/railing terminal walls shall be located on the superstructure.

EGCE 406: Bridge Design

LRFD Bridge Design Manual Changes

Lintel Tables Design Notes and Limitations

Introduction to Decks and Deck Systems

STRONGWELL GRIDFORM SLAB DESIGN MANUAL

Agricultural Hall and Annex East Lansing, MI. Structural Design. Gravity Loads. 1- Based on US Standards

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

2015 Mini, Small, Medium and Large Estimates

6.0 TUTORIAL. Cascade Consulting Associates, Inc. PO Box 1617 Corvallis, Oregon 97339

Flexure Design Sequence

CSiBridge Version Release Notes

Title Page: Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders

One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design

TXDOT ENGINEERING SOFTWARE SUPPORT INFORMATION. Prestressed Concrete Girder SUPERstructure Design and Analysis Program (PGSuper TM )

Release Notes MERLIN DASH

Design Aids of NU I-Girders Bridges

The University of Sydney School of Civil Engineering Centre for Advanced Structural Engineering NSW 2006 Australia. SupaPurlin

30 kip/ft (Dead load) 5 ft. 20 ft

CONTINUOUS SLAB BRIDGE COMPARITIVE STUDY

============================== spbeam v Upgraded August 2018 ==============================

Release Notes MERLIN DASH V10.8 (WIN 6.2)

User Guide. for Eurocode Modules. Design+ Interface General Column Design Combined Wall Design Strip Foundation Design Design Parameters

Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design

Class Topics & Objectives

Release Note DESIGN OF CIVIL STRUCTURES. Release Date : July Product Ver. : Civil 2015 (v1.1)

STRONGWELL GRIDFORM SLAB DESIGN MANUAL

PENNDOT e-notification

HORROCKS. Engineering Review of Proposed Cast-in-Place. Reinforced Arch Culvert Specification. For. Rinker Material Concrete Pipe Division

A REAL CASE STUDY ABOUT EVALUATION OF THE EXISTING SITUATION OF A POST TENSIONED SINGLE SPAN BOX GIRDER BRIDGE

Appendix M 2010 AASHTO Bridge Committee Agenda Item

Structural Option April 7 th, 2010

Design of Reinforced Concrete Slabs

Analysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I)

MIDAS Training Series

INTRODUCTORY WEBINAR:

LEARNING OF ETABS. 15 ft

Prestressed Concrete Girder Continuity Connection

Appendix B Flexural Resistance of Members with Reinforcing Bars Lacking Well-Defined Yield Plateau

CSiBridge Version Release Notes

Location Where Effective Slab Width is Checked

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 4584 Segmental Concrete Bridge Unit

Chapter 1. General Design Information. Introduction. Bridge Design Manual Chapter 1 General Design Information

Elimination of Deck Joints Using a Corrosion Resistant FRP Approach

Soldier pile and tremied concrete walls with strut supports (SI units)

ETABS Example Static, Dynamic Analysis and Design of RC Building with Shear Wall

VOL I: Bridge Design & Load Rating

ADAPT-BUILDER : General Analysis/Design Options

Reinforced Concrete Column Design

Basic types of bridge decks

Transcription:

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC2 Reinforced Concrete Slab Example

RC2 - Reinforced Concrete Slab Example CL Brg CL Brg 9" 6" (Typ) 30'-0" #5 9" #9 Elevation 1'-6" 27'-0" 24'-0" 1'-6" 18" slab thickness, consider ½ sacrificial wear thickness 1.5" clr. #5 2.0" clr. Top Row: 27-#5's @12" Bottom Row: 54-#9's @ 6" #5 Typical Section Material Properties Slab Concrete: Class A (US) f'c = 4.0 ksi, modular ratio n = 8 Slab Reinforcing Steel: AASHTO M31, Grade 60 with Fy = 60 ksi Parapets Weigh 300 lb/ft each. If slab cross section entered as 12" wide strip, member load due to parapets will be (2*300 lb/ft)/27' = 22 lb/ft. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 1

BrR and BrD Training RC2 - Reinforced Concrete Slab Example Topics Covered Single span reinforced concrete slab Sacrificial wear thickness for a slab Entered using both cross-section based and schedule based input methods From the Bridge Explorer create a new bridge and enter the following description data: Close the window by clicking Ok. This saves the data to memory and closes the window. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 2

To enter the materials to be used by members of the bridge, click on the The tree with the expanded Materials branch is shown below: to expand the tree for Materials. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 3

To add a new concrete material, click on Concrete in the tree and select File/New from the menu (or right mouse click on Concrete and select New). Add the concrete material by selecting from the Concrete Materials Library by clicking the Copy from Library button. The following window opens: Select the Class A (US) material and click Ok. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 4

The selected material properties are copied to the Bridge Materials Concrete window as shown below. Click Ok to save the data to memory and close the window. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 5

Add the following reinforcement steel in the same manner. We do not need to define any beam shapes since we are using a reinforced concrete slab. The slab will be entered later using two different methods, as a cross section and as a schedule based member alternative. Reinforced concrete slab could be entered as Girderline Superstructure Definitions in BrR/BrD. Since we will not be defining a Structure Typical Section for a girderline structure, we do not need to define any appurtenances. The dead load due to the appurtenances will be entered later as member loads. The default impact factors, standard LRFD and LFD factors will be used so we will skip to Superstructure Definition. Bridge Alternatives will be added after we enter the Superstructure Definition. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 6

Double click on SUPERSTRUCTURE DEFINITIONS (or click on SUPERSTRUCTURE DEFINITIONS and select File/New from the menu or right mouse click on SUPERSTRUCTURE DEFINITIONS and select New from the popup menu) to create a new structure definition. Select Girder Line Superstructure and the Structure Definition window will open. Enter the appropriate data as shown below: Click on Ok to save the data to memory and close the window. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 7

The partially expanded Bridge Workspace tree is shown below: We now go back to the Bridge Alternatives and create a new Bridge Alternative, a new Structure, and a new Structure Alternative as we did previously. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 8

The partially expanded Bridge Workspace tree is shown below: Last Modified: 8/29/2016 9

Click Load Case Description to define the dead load cases. The completed Load Case Description window is shown below. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 10

Describing a member: Open the Member window by double clicking on Member in tree. Fill in the window with the following information. If we press F1 while this window is active, the Help topic for the Member window will be displayed. This help topic tells us that girder spacing and member location are not required for a slab member so we will not enter any data for those items. The first Member Alternative that we create will automatically be assigned as the Existing and Current Member alternative for this Member. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 11

Double-click Member Loads to open the Member Loads window. This structure has 2 parapets each weighing 300 lb/ft. We are defining a 12 wide strip of slab as our member, and the width of the bridge cross section is 27 ft. So the parapet load applied to this member will be (2*300 lb/ft)/27 = 22 lb/ft. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 12

Cross Section Based Member Alternative This portion of the example deals with creating a cross section based member alternative. Defining a Member Alternative: Double-click MEMBER ALTERNATIVES in the tree to create a new alternative. The New Member Alternative dialog shown below will open. Select Reinforced Concrete for the Material Type and Reinforced Concrete Slab for the Girder Type. Click Ok to close the dialog and create a new member alternative. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 13

The Member Alternative Description window will open. Enter the appropriate data as shown below. AASHTO Article 3.24.4 states that concrete slabs designed in accordance with AASHTO Article 3.24.3 shall be considered satisfactory in bond and shear so we will select the LFD Ignore shear checkbox under the Shear computation method. We are considering ½ of our slab to be a sacrificial wear thickness. When we enter the cross section properties later, we are going to enter the effective slab thickness. We need to enter an additional load here on the member alternative window to account for the ½ sacrificial wear. (½ )/12 x 0.150 kcf = 0.0063 k/ft Last Modified: 8/29/2016 14

We can now enter the LRFD live load distribution factors for this member. Open Live Load Distribution window and select LRFD tab. Click Compute from Typical Section button, enter values as below in the pop up window. Click Continue button, BrR will compute LRFD live load distribution factors, click Ok button to close analysis window. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 15

The Live Load Distribution window will look like below. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 16

We can now create a new cross section by double-clicking on Cross Section in the tree. The completed Cross Section window is as follows. Note that we are entering the effective slab thickness here. The reinforcement for the section is shown below. Distance from the Top of Slab is measured from the top of the effective slab thickness. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 17

The cross section is now applied over the length of the member using the Cross Section Ranges window as shown below: Shear Reinforcement Ranges and Bracing Ranges are not applicable to this member so we will not enter any data in these windows. We also do not need to define any Points of Interest since we will not be overriding any information we have entered. The description of this structure is complete. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 18

The member alternative can now be analyzed. To perform LRFR rating, select the View Analysis Settings button on the toolbar to open the window shown below. Click Open Template button and select the LRFR Design Load Rating to be used in the rating and click Ok. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 19

Next click the Analyze button on the toolbar to perform the rating. When the rating is finished you can review the results by clicking the View analysis Report on the toolbar. The window shown below will open. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 20

Schedule Based Member Alternative This portion of the example deals with creating a schedule based member alternative. Create a new reinforced concrete member alternative for our member Typical Slab Member and enter the following data. Since we are describing a slab member and ignoring the shear in the slab the following discussion does not affect this particular example. However, it is an important item to be aware of when you are considering shear in the member so we will review it now. For a schedule based reinforced concrete member, it is important to enter a value for the End Bearing Locations in this window. This data describes the distance from the physical end of the beam to the centerline of the end bearings. It is important for us to enter this value here so that when we assign bar mark definitions to the reinforcement profile we can start our bars to the left of the first support line and to the right of the last support line. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 21

If our bars start to the left of the first support line and to the right of the last support line, BrR/BrD will consider the bars to be partially developed at the centerline of the bearing. Then the analysis engine will be able to compute the d distance from the extreme compression fiber to the centroid of the tension reinforcement. This d value is required to compute the shear capacity of the section. If the rebar starts at the centerline of the bearing, it will be considered as zero percent developed at this point so a d distance cannot be computed and the shear capacity of the beam will be zero. We can now enter the live load distribution factors. If you have created the cross section based member alternative in this example, you can copy the distribution factors from the cross section member alternative to the schedule based member alternative. Right click the Live Load Distribution label under the cross section member alternative and select Copy from the menu. Then right click the Live Load Distribution label under the schedule based member alternative and select Paste. If you have not entered cross section based member alternative, enter the following distribution factors by hand. Standard: Last Modified: 8/29/2016 22

LRFD: Open Live Load Distribution window, LRFD tab. Click Compute from Typical Section button, enter values as below in the pop up window. Click Continue button, BrR will compute LRFD live load distribution factors, click OK to close the analysis window. Live load distribution factors will be calculated as below. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 23

Deflection distribution factors. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 24

Moment and shear have the same following distribution factors. Before we can describe the girder and reinforcement profile for our member alternative, we should first define our Bar Mark Definitions. Bar Mark Definitions are used to define the longitudinal flexural reinforcement in schedule based reinforced concrete members. This bridge uses the following bar mark definitions: Last Modified: 8/29/2016 25

Last Modified: 8/29/2016 26

We are now ready to describe the Girder Profile: Last Modified: 8/29/2016 27

Distance from the Top of Slab is measured from the top of the effective slab thickness. The BrR/BrD export to the analysis engine will compute the required development lengths for the reinforcing steel based on the data entered in this window. These required development lengths are taken into account when the girder profile is exported to the analysis engine. In the export, BrR/BrD transforms the schedule-based definition of the concrete member into a list of cross sections and assigns these cross sections to ranges along the length of the member. Cross sections are cut where the reinforcing steel is developed. BrR/BrD assumes that the user has described the schedule of reinforcement as it physically exists in the bridge. BrR/BrD takes into account the required development length of the reinforcement when it exports cross sections for use by an analysis engine. If you do not want BrR/BrD to take into account the required development length, you should either check the "Fully Developed" box for the range of reinforcement on the Girder Profile: Reinforcement tab or check the "Fully Developed" box on the Point of Interest: Development tab. Checking either of these "Fully Developed" boxes means that the reinforcement as entered is fully developed and the full length of the bar will be included in the generated cross sections. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 28

The following shows the cross sections and cross section ranges that are generated for our example when we analyze the member alternative. BrR/BrD computes the development length of the bars as l d. The bars are fully developed at the l d distance from the end of the bar. BrR/BrD assumes the reinforcement develops in the bar in a linear fashion, starting with 0% development at the bar end and 100% development at the point of full development (ld) Three cross sections are generated in this example. At 0.0, the #5 bar is 28.6% developed and the #9 bars are 15.8% developed. These percentages are found as follows (note that the bars start 6 to the left of the centerline of the bearing): Last Modified: 8/29/2016 29

#5 bar 0.5 /1.75 = 0.286* 1 bar = 0.286 bar #9 bar 0.5 /3.1625 = 0.158 * 2 bars = 0.316 bars This cross section is applied from the 0.0 start of the member alternative to 1.25 where the #5 bar is fully developed. A similar procedure is followed at 1.25 which is where the #5 bar is fully developed and at 2.66 which is where the #9 bars are fully developed. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 30

If we select F1 while the Reinforcement tab is open, the BrR/BrD help topic for this window will open as shown below. This help topic contains very important information regarding the data on this window and it should be thoroughly reviewed prior to using the schedule based reinforcement features in BrR/BrD. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 31

This help topic contains links to several other useful topics that should be reviewed prior to defining schedule based reinforcement in BrR/BrD. The Export of Schedule Based Reinforced Concrete Members topic contains the rules and assumptions BrR/BrD uses when exporting schedule based reinforced concrete members to the analysis engine. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 32

The BrR/BrD export will also check the actual lap lengths of schedule based reinforcement against required lap lengths and present this information to the designer for their evaluation. BrR/BrD considers bars to be lapped if the vertical distance to their centroids is equal or if their clear cover is equal and the bars overlap along the length of the member. We do not have any lapped bars in this example. When an analysis or design review is run, a file is created that contains the input and output of the calculations BrR/BrD performed to compute the required development lengths and to check the lap lengths. This file can be accessed from the View Latest Analysis Output button on the Bridge Workspace toolbar. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 33

A schematic view of the reinforcement profile is available while the Girder Profile label is selected. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 34

We are now ready to analyze our schedule based member alternative. The following results are for an LRFR analysis. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 35

An LRFD design review of this girder for HL93 loading can be performed by BrD LRFD. To do LRFD design review, enter the Analysis Settings window as shown below: Last Modified: 8/29/2016 36

BrD LRFD analysis will generate a spec check results file. Click view the spec check results, double click the Spec Check Results in this window. on tool bar to open the following window. To Last Modified: 8/29/2016 37

The Spec Check Results match the following results from the cross section based member alternative. Last Modified: 8/29/2016 38