AGRONOMY 375 Exam II Key March 30, 2007

Similar documents
AGRONOMY 375 EXAM II. November 7, There are 15 questions (plus a bonus question) worth a total of up to 100 points possible. Please be concise.

AGRONOMY 375 Exam II Key November 2, 2018

Agronomy 375 Key - Exam I February 15, 2013

Getting the Most out of Your Nitrogen Fertilization in Corn Brent Bean 1 and Mark McFarland 2

AGRONOMY 375. October 2, Exam 1

Precision Nitrogen Management of Corn

Use of the Late-Spring Soil Nitrate Test

Name. AGRONOMY 375 February 15, 2008 Exam 1

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 10, 11 and 12, points possible

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 16, points possible

Drought Implications for Nutrient Management. Charles Wortmann

Purdue Crops Invitational

Options for in-season adjustment of nitrogen rate for corn

Nitrogen input decisions with tight crop production margins

CENTRAL PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION TEST

Number 209 September 11, 2009

2013 Agronomic Impacts Iowa Water Conference March 5. John Holmes Extension Field Agronomist

Corn Production: A Systems Approach. Sandy Endicott Senior Agronomy Manager, Canada and Latin America

National Sunflower Association of Canada Inc.

AGRONOMY 375. February 15, Exam 1

Top Strip-Till Practices for Corn and Soybean

2010 State FFA Crops Contest Written Exam

Starter Fertilizer for Corn in Vermont

UTILITY OF POLYMER-COATED UREA AS A FALL-APPLIED N FERTILIZER OPTION FOR CORN AND WHEAT

Effect of a rye cover crop and crop residue removal on corn nitrogen fertilization

Nitrogen A pop quiz!!! John Lamb SMBSC Grower Seminar Willmar, MN January 24, 2018

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT WHAT S DOABLE. John E. Sawyer Associate Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Cost-Effective N Management Using Reduced Rates of Polymer Coated Urea in Corn

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

Nitrogen management in annual vegetable crops

High-Yielding Soybean: Genetic Gain Fertilizer Nitrogen Interaction

Nitrates and Row Cropping

AGRONOMY 375. September 30, Exam 1

Nutrient Application Tips for No-Till Crop Production

LIQUID SWINE MANURE NITROGEN UTILIZATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION 1

Institute of Ag Professionals

WET WEATHER WOES. Corn

Long term impact of soybean rust on the Midwest corn-soybean rotation system

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley

Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center

!" #$ %&'(%)#*+,-.%/+'01%20+3',4%56,7808,.8!

Wheat Management. Anthony Ohmes University of Missouri Extension

ARKANSAS WHEAT Jason Kelley - Wheat and Feed Grains Extension Agronomist September 13, 2017

Nitrogen For Corn Production

CROP REPORT. USDA National Agriculture Summary Corn & Soybeans ISSUE 2: JULY, 2016

Fertilizer Management

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Non GMO Crop Production. Joe Lawrence

The Enigma of Soil Nitrogen George Rehm, University of Minnesota

Nutrient Management Conference Feb. 7, 2017, St. Cloud, MN Rick Gilbertson Pro Ag Crop Consultants, Inc.

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AGRONOMY DAY. agronomyday.cropsci.illinois.edu

NITROGEN EFFICIENCY AND FALL N APPLICATIONS. Larry G. Bundy Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Iowa Senate Natural Resources Committee February 3, 2015

In This Issue. Insects, Mites, And Nematodes. Purdue Cooperative Extension Service. September 19, Issue 24. Agronomy Tips

Fine-tune Nitrogen Management Using 4R Stewardship

Corn nitrogen rate management: Facts, concepts, and Mother Nature

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT USING REDUCED RATES OF POLYMER COATED UREA IN CORN

Northwest Regional Certified Crop Adviser

SEED

Interpreting Nitrate Concentration in Tile Drainage Water

Improve Nitrogen Management by Considering the Source

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Sugar Beet. Jay Norton Soil Fertility Specialist University of Wyoming

Nitrogen Fertilization of Corn

Soil Fertility: Current Topic July 20, 2017

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

Utilizing farmers changed nitrogen application technologies to demonstrate improved nutrient management practices year 2

Corn/Soybean Efficient Fertility Management - Manure

Split N Application for Corn and Wheat: Where, When, How and What to Expect

c) What optimality condition defines the profit maximizing amount of the input to use? (Be brief and to the point.)

Irrigated Spring Wheat

Two soil areas approximately 1 km (0.6 mile) apart were selected. Agronomy Department. High Rates of Urea Fertilizer for Corn (Zea mays L.

Corn Nitrogen Rate Calculator Impact of Nitrogen Application Timing on Corn Production

Getting the most out of your N fertilizer $ Prepared for 2013 Montana/Wyoming Barley and Sugarbeet Symposium

Crops. Information contained in this presentation came from the National Engineering Handbook Irrigation Guide

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team

Soybean Irrigation Management

Corn Stand Establishment

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley Cropping Systems Specialist University of Missouri, Columbia

Pop-up and/or Starter Fertilizers for Corn

Carinata Fit into SE Cropping Systems

Corn Agronomy Update

Ontario Corn Nitrogen Soil N Survey 2015

IMPACT OF N FERTILIZER SOURCE AND DRAINAGE ON SPATIAL VARIATION IN NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL N LOSS. Steve Anderson Professor

USE OF STRIP-TILLAGE FOR CORN PRODUCTION IN KANSAS

Evaluating Corn Row Spacing and Plant Population in thetexas Panhandle

Plant Nutrient Uptake Timing and Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers N Conference, Havre December 8, 2010

AGRONOMY 375. February 28, Exam 1

Between a Rock and a. Hard Place. Corn Profitability

Sunflower Seeding Rate x Nitrogen Rate Trial Report

Rainout Shelter: A Tool for Understanding the Link between Soil Water, Irrigation, and Corn Yield

Do We Grow Another Bushel or Save a Buck?

Is the soybean N credit real? Indiana CCA Conference Indianapolis, December 12, 2017

Nitrogen Transformation Inhibitors and Controlled Release Urea

FERTILIZER PLACEMENT OPTIONS FOR IRRIGATED NO-TILL CORN 2005 THE DAKOTA LAKES STAFF

2005 CROP PRODUCTION EXAM Purdue Invitational Crops Contest

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era

DOES IT PAY TO FERTILIZE CORN WITH NITROGEN? 1

2005 CROP PRODUCTION EXAM Purdue Invitational Crops Contest

Transcription:

AGRONOMY 375 Exam II Key March 30, 2007 6 pts. 1. a) Detassel ear parent (female) rows and specify a single pollen parent in male rows. b) Manage the planting dates of ear and pollen parent lines so as to encourage synchrony between them at pollination (tassel and silk coordinating). c) Flame one parent line to slow its growth where it is more rapid than its counterpart (synchronize silking and pollen release). d) Manage the frequency of ear parent and pollen parent rows to accommodate the productive potential of the pollen parent. e) Low altitude aircraft to assist pollen dispersal. f) Isolate the seed field. g) Remove rogue plants from the parent rows. 4 pts. 2. a) Less risk of frost injury b) Less pre-harvest loss to ear drop & lodging c) Less weathering, molding & insect damage d) Option to sort out "off-type" ears at processing plant e) Less damage to the seed (mechanical) if handled on ear when wet f) More uniform drying at lower temperatures when dried on the ear 5 pts. 3. (120 days) (23.5 GDD per day relative maturity) = 2820 GDD relative maturity. 2 pts. 4. (Two answers) a) Soil fertility levels (particularly P and K) will vary greatly among mangers. b) N rate. c) Timing of N application ( Fall, Pre-Plant, Side dress). d) Plant populations may be unique. e) Planting date has a major impact on overall yield as well as on other factors such as population. On site testing of hybrids will bring out optimal combinations for unique management packages. f) Use of N-Serve g) Tillage and planting system (e.g. no-till, residue management, etc). 4 pts. 5. Early planting involves cool soils so shallow planting (just deep enough to cover the seed) will aid germination as soil warming occurs from the surface downward and soil moisture is not likely to be limiting. Later planted seeds are less likely to be limited by cool temperatures and more likely to be limited by inadequate soil moisture so planting deeper is recommended in order to get to

moisture. A good goal in such a case is to place the seed about ½ inch deeper than the upper margin of moist soil if possible but no deeper than 2 inches total. 10 pts. 6. a) Grain yield and profit potential increase as total season length increases to provide greater total interception of solar radiation. b) Increased harvest index due to affect of low temperature early (vegetative growth) and high temperature mid- to late season (grain development). Increases harvest index contributes directly to increased yield. c) Plant height is reduced due to the low temperature affect on early growth. This results in less potential for lodging and greater tolerance to high plant populations. d) Pre-harvest losses are reduced as early-planted corn matures quickly and dries down early in the fall while temperatures are high and relative humidity is low. e) Early planting results in a broad choice among alternative hybrids. f) Early planting allows replanting with the first-choice hybrids. g) Early planting generally results in an avoidance of high temperature and drought stress during pollination. 10 pts. 8. All of these strategies improve the efficiency of N fertilizer use by the crop. Without these precautions, the potential for N loss through leaching and/or denitrification is particularly high for Fall applications because of the extended time that the fertilizer nitrogen would be exposed to loss when fall applied. a) Application of N as ammonia only, allows for maximum security from loss as ammonia reacts with soil moisture to produce ammonium (NH 4 +), a cation which is held by a soil s exchange sites. b) At temperatures below 50 F the conversion of ammonium (NH 4 +) to Nitrite (NO 2 -) (and ultimately to Nitrate (NO 3- ) is slowed sufficiently to lessen the potential for N loss to acceptable levels. c) At more northern latitudes soil temperatures generally reach the 50 C threshold earlier in the Fall and remain low longer in the Spring, thus slowing nitrification. d) Fall N application is not recommended unless a soil has a C.E.C. of at least 10 meq/100 grams as a means of assuring adequate negative charge to retain ammonium which is a cation (positive charge). e) Well drained soils demonstrate less potential for loss to denitrification as atmospheric oxygen is more readily available in pore spaces of these soils which are not waterlogged for extended periods. 7 pts. 8. At 20 ppm, the P1 Soil Test Level is in the maintenance range of 15 to 30 ppm so a full maintenance rate is recommended.

(225 Bu/Acre) (0.37 Lbs P 2 O 5 /Bu) = 83.25 Lbs P 2 O 5 /Acre 2 pts. 83.25 = 160.1 Lbs 11-52-0/Acre 0.52 7 pts. 9. a) Annual K 2 O (pounds per acre): At CEC = 16, the Critical Level is calculated as follows. 75 + [ (2.5) (16) ] = 115 ppm At 150 ppm the K soil test is in the drawdown range of 146 through 165 ppm The drawdown calculation is as follows: Full Maintenance Rate is [(225 Bu / acre)(0.27 Lbs. K 2 O / Bu)] + 20 = 80.8 Lbs. K 2 O/ acre Drawdown Rate is 80.8 Lbs. K 2 O / acre - [(80.8 Lbs. K 2 O / acre) X (150 ppm - 145 ppm))] 20 = 60.6 Lbs. K 2 O / acre 2 pts. b) Total annual pounds 0-0-60 per acre. 60.6 Lbs. K 2 O per acre / 0.60 = 101 Lbs. 0-0-60 per acre 7 pts. 10. a) 110 + [1.36 (225-100)] 30 previous crop soy credit = 250 Lbs fertilizer N/Acre 2 pts. b) 250 Lbs N/Acre -17.6 Lbs N/Acre from 160.1 Lbs. 11-52-0 per acre 232.4 /.82 = 283.4 Lbs. NH3 per acre 4 pts. 11. PSNT may be quite valuable where there is relatively high uncertainty as to the level of plant available N present in the soil just prior to side dressing. Examples of such situations include; N applied in the Fall of the Spring followed by unusually warm, wet conditions over a prolonged period. Under these conditions there is a high potential for N loss through denitrification and leaching. On soils with high organic matter levels or on soils which have received heavy applications of livestock waste. Under these conditions significant amounts of N are mineralized from the organic sources but the amount of N made available can be quite variable. PSNT will allow a snapshot in time to determine side dress needs with greater precision.

8 pts. 12. (Two answers) a) Cost effective, efficient, least potential for environmental contamination. Side-dressing results in very low levels of loss and maximum N availability to the developing crop. b) Allows N rate adjustment as conditions dictate in the spring. c) Allows switch to soybeans where losses are extreme. d) Best option for soils with low CEC (less potential loss). 4 pts. 13. (Two answers) a) Any root restrictive conditions e.g. Early planting date (cool soils) No-till soils with heavy surface residue Poor soil drainage Dry soils b) Low to very low soil test levels c) Low rates of fertilizer application ( especially where soil test levels are relatively low). 4 pts. 14. Before May 1 plant when soil temperatures at seed depth are at or above 50F (e.g. 50 at 2 inch depth at 7 a.m.) After May 1 plant when sufficiently dry (good soil to seed contact and acceptable levels of soil compaction). 4 pts. 15. a) Average seed to seed spacing is 35 / 5 = 7 inches. (1 seed / 7 in.) ( 12 in. / ft.) (17,424 ft. / acre) = 29,870 seeds/ acre 4 pts. b) x x 2 1-7 = 6 36 70 / r - 1 = 70 / 4 = 17.5 = s 2 8-7 = 1 1 5-7 = 2 4 12-7 = 5 25 s = 4.2 inches 9-7 = 2 4 110 4 pts. c) 3 bu / acre yield penalty for each inch of standard deviation greater than 2. 4.2-2.0 = 2.2 inches of standard deviation greater than 2. (2.2) ( 3) = 6.6 bushels per acre as the potential yield penalty.

5 pts. BONUS a) Use full labeled rates of herbicides. b) Rotate herbicide modes of action (no more than two consecutive applications of one mode of action). d) Use integrated approach to weed control (cultural, mechanical, and chemical). e) Scout for and remove herbicide resistant weeds before they can produce seed. f) Clean field equipment before transporting from field to field when resistant weeds are present. g) Combine modes of herbicide action (either concurrent of sequential). h) Rotate crops. i) Use weed free seed.