Impact of seed dressers in management of sucking pest complex infesting Okra

Similar documents
Evaluation of Newer Pesticides against Leafhopper Population and its Effect on Summer Okra Yield

Evaluation of newer insecticides against leaf hopper on Bt cotton

Bio-Efficacy of Carbofuran 3% CG against Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in Tomato

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUCKING PESTS OF COTTON

Studies on the Bio-efficacy of new insecticide molecules against insect pests in cotton aicrp on cotton

Volume 1 Issue 1 January-March,2012. BIO-EFFICACY OF VARIOUS INSECTICIDES AGAINST OKRA SHOOT AND FRUIT BORER, Earias vittella (FAB.

ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED ECO-FRIENDLY PESTICIDES ON AMRASCA BIGUTTULA BIGUTTULA OF OKRA CROP IN CENTRAL REGION OF UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA

Management of major insect pests of black gram under dryland conditions

Effect of Application of Biopesticides and Insecticides on Stem Borers and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.)

BIOEFFICACY OF CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AGAINST EARIAS

SEASONAL INCIDENCE OF SUCKING PESTS ON OKRA

Validation of recommended doses of insecticides against sucking pests of BT cotton

Bio Efficacy of Some Commercially Available Eco-Friendly Insecticides against Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella L. in Cabbage

Bio-efficacy of some newer insecticides against Uroleucon compositae (Theobald) infesting safflower, Carthamus tinctorius Linnaeus

REACTION OF BT COTTON HYBRIDS AGAINST SUCKING INSECT PESTS IN MALWA REGION OF MADHYA PRADESH

Bioefficacy of Certain Insecticides and Biopesticides against Spotted Pod Borer, Maruca vitrata Infesting Greengram

Study on Bioefficacy of Insecticides against Shoot Weevil (Alcidodes affaber Aurivillius) in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus Linn.)

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF POTASH ON INCIDENCE OF SUCKING PESTS IN BRINJAL SHAIKH, A. A.* AND PATEL, J. J.

Effect of the abiotic factors on major insect pests in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) under Chhattisgarh Plain

EFFICACY AND ECONOMICS OF VARIOUS PEST MANAGEMENT MODULES

Efficacy of Different Combination of Insecticides against Cowpea Pod Borer in Cowpea [Vigna ungiculata (L.) Walp.]

Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences e-issn Kalipada Pramanik et al.; Sch J Agric Vet Sci 2014; 1(4):

Evaluation of integrated pest management (IPM) module against sucking pests of black gram under semi arid conditions

Population Dynamics of Sucking Pests with Relation to Weather Parameters in Bt Cotton in Buldana District, Maharashtra, India

Nature of Gene Action in Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] through Diallel Analysis

POPULATION DYNAMICS OF FRUIT AND SHOOT BORERS ON OKRA IN RELATION TO CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF NORTHERN DRY ZONE OF KARNATAKA

Evaluation of Newer Insecticides aganist Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.) Infesting Rice

INCIDENCE, DAMAGE POTENTIAL AND MANAGEMENT OF JASSIDS IN GROUNDNUT FIELD DR. G. C. BISWAS 1

FIELD EFFICACY OF BIOPESTICIDES ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH INSECTICIDES AGAINST BRINJAL SHOOT AND FRUIT BORER AND NATURAL ENEMIES

Chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + Abamectin 1.7% SC: A Safer Insecticide to Natural Enemies (Spiders and Coccinellids) in Tomato Ecosystem

Influence of Abiotic Factors on Population Fluctuation of Leaf Hopper, Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) on Okra

Effect of Organic Soil Amendments on the Activity of Sucking Pests of Chilli

Evaluation of Novel Insecticides against Spodoptera litura in Soybean (Glycine max L. Merill) Crop

Analysis of insecticides in okra and brinjal from IPM and non-ipm fields

Evaluation of new molecules against jassids and white flies of Bt cotton

Field Evaluation of Virtako 2.4 DT an insecticidal tablet against certain key pests on rice

Epidemiology of Okra Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus (OYVMV) and Its Management through Tracer, Mycotal and Imidacloprid

ROLE OF ABIOTIC FACTORS ON POPULATION BUILD UP OF ARTHROPOD FAUNA IN OKRA ECOSYSTEM UNDER GANGETIC ALLUVIAL PLAIN OF WEST BENGAL

Studies on Population Dynamics of Key Pests of Cotton

BT COTTON PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY AS INFLUENCED BY NUTRIENT LEVELS AND NITROGEN SPLIT APPLICATION UNDER IRRIGATION

Evaluation of new and conventional insecticides for the management of mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi

Effect of Quinchlorac on Grassy Weeds in Transplanted Rice

Screening of germplasm for tolerrance against major stem pests of soybean

Positioning Cluster Bean, Cyamopsis trtragonoloba L. in an Effective way to Reduce the Major Insect Pest Load of Okra, Abelmoschus esculentus L.

Comparative efficacy of some bio and synthetic insecticide against Bemisia tabaci (genn) on okra crop

INTEGRATED FIELD MANAGEMENT OF JASSID (AMRASCA BIGUTTULA BIGUTTULA ISHIDA.) INFESTING LADYSFINGER (ABELMOSCHUS ESCULENTUS L.) USING BIO-PESTICIDES

Population Density of Myzus persicae Sulzer (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Six Cabbage Varieties under New Alluvial Zone

Relative efficacy and economics of seed treatment and newer insecticides against sucking and borer pests of summer mungbean in coastal Odisha

WHITE FLY: A CHEMICAL CONTROL

A Comparative Analysis of Production and Marketing of Bt Cotton and Hybrid Cotton in Saurashtra Region of Gujarat State

Field efficacy and economics of some new insecticide molecules against lepidopteran caterpillars in chickpea

Bio efficacy of Newer Insecticide Molecules against Safflower Capsule Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 4, 2017,

STUDIES ON PLANTING TECHNIQUE-CUM-IRRIGATION METHODS UNDER VARIED LEVELS OF NITROGEN ON GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF WINTER MAIZE (Zea mays L.

Status and constraints of organic wheat cultivation in Punjab

Studies on the Interaction between Varietal Resistance and Management Practices against Leaf Blast of Rice

India is the second largest producer of fruits and vegetables

Field evaluation of some newer fungicides against leaf spot of safflower caused by Alternaria carthami

BIORATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF MAJOR PESTS OF BRINJAL

Cucumbers (Pickles and Slicers) IPM Element Revised March, 2012

Cost of cultivation and resource use efficiency of major rabi crops in vidisha district of Madhya Pradesh

Bio-Efficacy of insecticides against sucking pests; Jassid and Thrips infesting tomato

EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON GROWTH CHARACTERISTIC OF KHARIF MAIZE

Effect of Herbicides on Yield and Economics of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

In vitro and In vivo Evaluation of Fungicides Against Pyricularia oryzae Causing Blast of Rice

Neonicotinoids. Neonicotinoid Profile. Safety. Neonicotinoids and Bees

EFFICACY OF POST EMERGENCE HERBICIDES ON WEED CONTROL EFFICIENCY, PARTITIONING OF DRYMATTER AND YIELD OF BLACKGRAM (VIGNA MUNGO (L.

Water requirement of wheat crop for optimum production using CROPWAT model

Update on insect pest management and Cucumber mosaic virus in snap bean

Performances of Three Cotton Varieties Cultivated under Economic Threshold Level Based Insecticide Sprayed and Non-Sprayed Conditions

Bio-efficacy of Certain Selective Insecticides against Whitefly, (Bemisia tabaci) on Mungbean, (Vigna radiata L., Wilczek)

Effect of Split Application of Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Economics of Bt Cotton Hybrid under Rainfed Condition

Economics of production of Alphonso mango in Sindhudurg district

CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN INDIA (ISSN ): VOL. 7: ISSUE: 1 (2017)

Knowledge of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Practices among Chilli Farmers in Raichur District of Karnataka, India

Bioefficacy of Synthetic Insecticides, Bio-Pesticide and Botanical against Thrips and Watermelon Bud Necrosis Viral Disease on Watermelon

Management of Mungbean Yellow Mosaic Virus (MYMV) in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)

Impact of climate change on wheat productivity in Ludhiana and Bathinda of Punjab

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT INSECTICIDES ON SUCKING AND CHEWING INSECT PESTS OF COTTON

Effect of Training Need for Papaya Growers in Begusarai District of Bihar

ABSTRACT Field experiment was conducted during and on deep black soil. Results revealed

CONSTRAINTS IN ADOPTION OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICES OF VEGETABLE CROPS

Knowledge of sugarcane growers regarding integrated pest and disease management practices in Nandurbar district

RESEARCH PAPER INTRODUCTION

A Study on the Extent of Adoption of Various Recommended Technologies in Wheat Cultivation in Punjab

Efficacy and economics of different insecticidal treatments for the management of major sucking insect pests of sesame

Mirid Menace-A Potential Emerging Sucking Pest Problem in Cotton

Okra, Abelmoschus esculentus L. is an

Pearl of oil called as soya. Soybean (Glycine

IMPACT OF MECHANICAL MEASURES AND APPLICATION OF COMMON HERBICIDES ON WHEAT (TRITICUM ESTIVUM L.) PERFORMANCE AND THEIR RELATED WEEDS UNDER ALFISOLS

THE PERFORMANCE OF NEW PEARL MILLET HYBRIDS WITH GREENGRAM UNDER SOLE CROPPING AND INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS IN SEMI-ARID ENVIRONMENT

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF SOME INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUCKING INSECT PESTS ON MUNGBEAN, VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK

International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship Special Issue 2, 2014

Estimation of GCV, PCV, Heritability and Genetic Gain for Yield and its Related Components in Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (l.

Analysis of technological gap in potato production technology

Knowledge on SRI (System of Rice Intensification) of Farmers in Tripura, India

Evaluation of different IPM modules against pest complex of Chilli (cv. Byadgi dabbi)

EFFECT OF CULTIVAR, FUNGICIDE SPRAY AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON MANAGEMENT OF RICE BLAST UNDER TEMPERATE ECOSYSTEM

Evaluation of Living and Synthetic Mulches in Zucchini for Control of Homopteran Pests

Innovative IPM solutions for winter wheat-based rotations: cropping systems assessed in Denmark

Transcription:

Research Journal of Recent Sciences ISSN 22772502 Impact of seed dressers in management of sucking pest complex infesting Okra Abstract Khaja Rumana Begum, Sarjerao Patil and Pandurang Mohite* Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Kolhapur416 004, MS, India pandurang6@yahoo.co.in Available online at: www.isca.in, www.isca.me Received 1 st January 2016, revised 15 th March 2017, accepted 6 th April 2017 Among the newer insecticides tested for their efficacy as seed dressers against sucking pests of okra viz., leafhoppers, aphids, whiteflies and thrips, results revealed that clothianidin 600 FS @ 9ml/kg seed was significantly superior in reducing population of sucking pests and was at par with imidacloprid 70 WS @ 10g/kg seed. This was followed by clothianidin 600 FS @ 7ml/kg seed and thiamethoxam 70 WS. Clothianidin 600 FS @ 9ml/kg seed recorded 90.79, 983, 88.1, 87 per cent reduction over untreated control against leafhoppers, aphids, whiteflies and thrips respectively and also recorded maximum marketable yield of okra fruits (58.9 q/ha) with 98.96 per cent increase over untreated control. Keywords: Okra, Leafhoppers, Aphids, Whiteflies and thrips, Seed Dressers. Introduction Among the vegetable crops grown in India, Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) also known as lady s finger in western style and bhendi in Indian language is an important crop grown throughout the year. Aphids and leafhoppers are important pests in the early stage of the crop which desap the plants, make them weak and reduce the yield. Failure to control them in the initial stages was reported to cause an yield loss to the tune of 504 1. Whitefly besides causing direct damage, acts as a vector of yellow vein mosaic virus (YVMV), which is a major constraint for okra cultivation 2. The use of conventional pesticides for the management of sucking pests has mainly attributed for the rapid population build up of these pests. The augmented problems associated with modern agriculture, the management of sucking pests was experienced to be difficult with the existing organophosphorus compounds, upon which long reliance was shown by farming community. Under such conditions use of new group of insecticides as seed dressers emerged most promising, low cost, less polluting with least interference in the natural equilibrium. Newer group of insecticides offer great scope as they maintain high toxicity to insects at lower doses and are not persistent as conventional group of insecticides. Material and methods The certified seeds of okra variety Arka Anamika were made available from the local market. After washing, the seeds were dried in shade and were treated with six insecticides in Randomized block design with four replications. Beds of ridges and furrows of 4 3 mt size were prepared and two seeds at one place were dibbled at 2025mm depth, following 30 15 cms spacing. After seven days of sowing thinning and gap filling was done and at one spot one plant was maintained. The recommended fertilizer dose were given. Observations on the incidence of aphids, jassids, thrips and whiteflies were recorded on ten randomly selected plants per plot. Number of aphids, jassids, thrips and whiteflies were recorded from three leaves of each randomly selected plants, one upper, one middle and one lower 3. The observations were recorded at 10, 20, 30 and 45 days after complete emergence of seedlings in all treatments. The average number of pest individuals per three leaves of a plant for each plot were calculated. Yield of marketable okra fruits obtained from different pickings was taken into account. Weight and number of healthy fruits at each picking was calculated from each net plot. The treatmentby summation of the yield wise total yield was calculated obtained in the 18 pickings and then converted to quintals per hectare on the basis of area of treatment plot. The average survival population of jassids, aphids, thrips and whiteflies were square root transformed by Poisson formula and standard statistical method of analysis of variance was applied for the analysis of the data. Results and discussion The data on the efficacy of various treatments in reducing leafhopper, aphids, white flies and thrips population are furnished in Table 1 International Science Community Association 1

Research Journal of Recent Sciences ISSN 22772502 Table1: Efficacy of newer insecticides as seed dressers against leafhoppers in Okra. No. of leafhoppers/ 3 leaves Clothianidin 7.0 ml 13 25 91 26 13 600 FS (28) (66) (1) (4) (9) Clothianidin 9.0 ml 0.64 02 28 31 06 600 FS (09) (58) (66) (95) (6) Thiamethoxam 0 g 57 7 14 57 49 70 WS (44) (79) (91) (66) (99) Imidacloprid 70 10 g 0.98 56 73 63 25 WS (22) (43) (79) (03) (65) Carbosulfan 25 50.0 g 87 79 3 8.26 55 SD (83) (3) (6) (96) (46) Untreated 167 19.66 23 38 236 control (62) (48) (07) (68) (78) S.E. (±) 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 C.D. @ 5% 0.18 0.22 0.24 0.27 Table2: Efficacy of newer insecticides as seed dressers against aphids in Okra. Sr. No. Insecticides Dose/kg 801% 90.79% 84% 89.4% 72% No. of aphids/ 3 leaves Clothianidin 7.0 ml 48 91 34 8 63 600 FS (41) (1) (2) (31) (03) Clothianidin 9.0 ml 0.96 37 58 32 55 600 FS (2) (36) (5) (72) (43) Thiamethoxam 0 g 93 34 6 06 73 70 WS (57) (96) (26) (36) (05) Imidacloprid 70 10 g 34 76 12 89 02 WS (36) (5) (69) (84) (58) Carbosulfan 25 50.0 g 07 36 73 7.0 54 SD (89) (42) (69) (74) (74) Untreated 16 18.39 23 30.1 26 control (75) (34) (97) (53) (7) S.E. (±) 0.06 0.08 0.096 0.09 C.D. @ 5% 0.19 0.24 0.29 0.27 Figures in parentheses are square root of (X+0.5) transformed values. DAS Days after sowing. 82 % 983 % 874 % 90.65 % 74 % International Science Community Association 2

Research Journal of Recent Sciences ISSN 22772502 Table3: Efficacy of newer insecticides as seed dressers against whiteflies in Okra. No. of whiteflies/ 3 leaves Clothianidin 7.0 ml 34 32 95 38 49 600 FS (36) (68) (86) (97) (73) Clothianidin 9.0 ml 0.86 51 86 09 58 600 FS (17) (42) (53) (61) (44) Thiamethoxam 0 g 54 25 14 47 85 70 WS (43) (66) (91) (23) (83) Imidacloprid 10 g 29 43 56 49 19 70 WS (34) (38) (75) (99) (64) Carbosulfan 50.0 g 91 38 73 3 83 25 SD (1) (2) (28) (84) (6) Untreated 189 162 16 16 117 control (51) (62) (75) (88) (69) S.E. (±) 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 C.D. @ 5% 0.18 0.21 0.24 0.26 Figures in parentheses are square root of (X+0.5) transformed values. DAS Days after sowing Table4: Efficacy of newer insecticides as seed dressers against thrips in Okra. 81 % 88.01 % 78.4 % 892 % 64 % No. of thrips/ 3 leaves Clothianidin 7.0 ml 13 03 14 49 69 600 FS (28) (88) (91) (12) (78) Clothianidin 9.0 ml 0.62 46 98 83 72 600 FS (05) (4) (57) (82) (49) Thiamethoxam 0 g 34 25 91 29 94 70 WS (36) (65) (1) (19) (85) Imidacloprid 70 10 g 0.97 98 36 21 13 WS (21) (54) (69) (92) (62) Carbosulfan 25 50.0 g 06 18 69 66 89 SD (6) (92) (28) (38) (09) Untreated 154 186 11 146 10 control (47) (51) (54) (6) (53) S.E. (±) 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.07 C.D. @ 5% 0.21 0.24 0.26 0.23 Figures in parenthesis are square root of (X+0.5) transformed values. DAS Days after sowing. 77.59 % 87 % 75 % 83 % 67.6 % International Science Community Association 3

Research Journal of Recent Sciences ISSN 22772502 Table5: Effect of newer insecticides as seed dressers on yield of Okra yield of okra Sr.No. Treatments Dosage/kg seed fruit (q/ha) Increase over control (q/ha) Per cent increase over control Clothianidin 600 FS 7 ml 56 20 845 Clothianidin 600 FS 9 ml 58.9 29.3 98.96 Thiamethoxam 70 WS 5 g 52 26 818 Imidacloprid 70 WS 10 g 56 27.0 92 Carbosulfan 25 SD 50.0 g 47.9 18.3 68 Untreated control 29.6 S.E.(±) 0.1 C.D.(5 %) 0.31 Leaf hopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula): When the overall mean population of leafhoppers was taken in to account, considerably less population density was noticed in clothianidin 600 FS @ 9ml/kg seed (06 leafhoppers/3 leaves) which was at par with imidacloprid 70 WS (25 leafhoppers/3 leaves). This was followed by clothianidin 600 FS @ 7ml/kg seed (13 leafhoppers/3 leaves), thiamethoxam 70 WS (49 leaf hoppers/3 leaves) and carbosulfan 25 SD (55 leafhoppers/3 leaves). The highest reduction in the population over untreated control was noticed in case of clothianidin 600 FS @9 ml/kg seed (90.79%). The results of the present investigations are in agreement with the findings of earlier workers. Udikeri et al. 4 reported that clothianidin 600 FS @ 9 ml/kg seed and imidacloprid 70 WS @10 g/kg seed effectively managed leafhopper population in okra where as Sinha and Sharma 5 reported that imidacloprid 3g a.i./kg seed successfully managed leafhopper population in okra. However, the cotton crop was found to be free from jassids up to 3560 days after germination due to seed treatment with thiamethoxam @ 43g/kg seed 6. Rana etal. 7 reported that seed treatment of okra with carbosulfan 25 SD @ 4g/kg seed is effective in controlling early season sucking pests in seed crop of okra. Aphid (Aphis gossypii): aphid population of all treatments revealed that the least aphid count was recorded in clothianidin 600 FS @ 9ml/kg seed (55 aphids/3 leaves) and imidacloprid 70 WS (02 aphids/3 leaves) followed by clothianidin 600 FS @ 7ml/kg seed (63 aphids/3 leaves), thiamethoxam 70 WS (73 aphids/3 leaves) and carbosulfan (54 aphids/ 3 leaves). All the treatments proved their superiority over untreated control. Clothianidin 600 FS @ 9 ml/kg seed provided excellent protection against aphids by keeping the aphid population below ETL level up to 45 days after sowing. The present investigation on newer insecticides as seed dressers against okra aphid is in line with the findings of Patil et al. 8 and according to them clothianidin 50 per cent WD @ 20 and 25 g a.i./ha was effective against aphids in cotton. Day et al. 9 reported that imidacloprid 70 WS provided excellent protection against okra aphid up to 45 days after sowing. The effectiveness of carbosulfan (0.05%) in controlling okra aphid was reported by Chinnaiah 10. Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci): whitefly population of all treatments revealed that least whitefly population was recorded in clothianidin 600 FS @ 9ml/kg seed (58 whiteflies/3 leaves) and imidacloprid 70 WS (19 whiteflies/3 leaves) followed by clothianidin 600 FS @ 7ml/kg seed, thiamethoxam 70 WS and carbosulfan 25 SD (19, 49 and 85 whiteflies/3 leaves respectively). The present findings are in close agreement with the earlier observations made by Udikeri et al. 4 who reported that seed treatment with clothianidin 600 FS afforded protection against whiteflies in cotton. Day et al. 9 reported that imidacloprid 70 WS provided excellent protection against whiteflies up to 45 days after sowing. Kale et al. 11 indicated that thiamethoxam seed treatment @ 5 g/kg seed followed by alphamethrin 0.05% spray was the most effective treatment in reducing whitefly populations. The effiacacy of carbosulfan 25 SD @ 4g/kg seed in controlling whiteflies in seed crop of okra was recorded by Rana et al. 7. Thrips (Thrips tabaci): When overall mean population of thrips was taken into account, considerably less density of thrips was noticed in the treatment with clothianidin 600 FS @ 9 ml/kg seed (72 thrips/3 leaves) which was at par with imidacloprid 70 WS (13 thrips/3leaves). This was followed by clothianidin 600 FS @ 7ml/kg seed (69 thrips/3 leaves), thiamethoxam 70 WS (94 thrips/3 leaves) and carbosulfan 25 SD (89 thrips/3 leaves). The superiority of clothianidin has been documented by International Science Community Association 4

Research Journal of Recent Sciences ISSN 22772502 Dhandapani et al. who revealed that clothianidin (Poncho 600 FS) @ 12 ml/kg seed effectively controlled thrips in cotton up to 8 weeks after sowing. Patil et al. reported the effectiveness of thiamethoxam cruiser 35 FS in reducing population of thrips and recorded higher yield of seed cotton. Rana et al. reported the effectiveness of carosulfan 25 SD @ 4 g/kg seed in controlling thrips in seed crop of okra. Conclusion Considering the overall results obtained it is inferred that clothianidin 600 FS was found to be superior in controlling leafhoppers, aphids, whiteflies and whiteflies such an efficacy may be due to flowable suspension formulation of clothianidin (Poncho 600 FS) in thick liquid state which has got an edge over WS formulations for seed treatment in terms of easiness in treating seeds and also the performance to check sucking pest population. Therefore it, appears to be a promising option. References Chaudhary H.R. and Dadheech L.N. (1989). Incidence of insects attacking okra and avoidable losses caused by them. Ann. Arid zone.28(34), 305307. Neeraja G., Vijaya M., Chiranjeevi C. and Gautam B. (2004). Screening of okra hybrids against pests and diseases. Indian J.Pl. Protec., 32(1), 12913 Singh G. and S.K.Kaushik (1990). Comparative efficiency of sampling techniques for jassid population estimation on okra. Indian J. Ecol., 17(1), 5860. Udikeri S.S., Patil S.B., Naik Krishna L. and Rachappa V. (2007). Poncho600FS Anew seed dressing formulation for the sucking pest management in cotton. Karnataka J.Agric.Sci., 20(1), (5153). Sinha. S.R. and R.K.Sharma (2008.) Utilization of some novel insecticide schedules in insect pest management of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). J. Pesticide Research, 20(2), 23423 Das S.B. and O.P. Veda (2005). Integrated management of insect pests of cotton. Crop care, 31(2), 6770. 7. Rana S.C., Singh P.B., Pandita V.K. and Sinha S.N. (2006). Evaluation of insecticides as seed treatment for control of early sucking pests in seed crop of okra. Ann.Pl.Protec.Sci., 14(2), 364367. 8. Patil B.V. and Rajanikanth R. (2004). New class of insecticides mode of action and their bioefficacy. Paper presented in Int.Symp.Strat.Sust.Cotton Prod., A Gloal vision, 232 9. Day P.K., Jana S.K., Chakraorthy G. and Somachoudhary A.K. (2005). Evaluation of Imidacloprid (70WS and 20SL) against sucking pest of okra, Abelmoschus esculentus. J. Ent. Res., 29(3), 215218. 10. Chinniah C. and Ali K.A. (2000). Relative efficacy of insecticides/acaricides against sucking pests of okra. Pest Mangt. And Econ Zool, 8(2), 11111 1 Kale J.V., Wadnerkar D.W., Zanwar P.R. and Sangle P.D. (2005). Bioefficacy of newer insecticides against insect pests of okra. Pestology, 29(8), 91 1 Krishna L. Naik, Nimbal F., Guruprasad G.S. Patil. S.B., Udikeri S.S. and Rachappa V. (2007). Dantop: A promising new molecule for management of cotton sap feeding insects. Karnataka J.Agric.Sci., 20(1), (47). International Science Community Association 5