Grassy Mountain Gold Project Environmental Evaluation - Draft Outline

Similar documents
Grassy Mountain Gold Project

GUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN IN NEW BRUNSWICK

Grassy Mountain Gold Project - Environmental Evaluation and Socioeconomic Study Draft Outlines & Preliminary Schedule

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

Santoy 8 Satellite Mine at the Seabee Gold Mine. Technical Review Comments. on the. Environmental Impact Statement.

NEPA & Mining Tribal Lands and Environment Forum. August 17, 2015 Minneapolis, Minnesota

Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Mount

EAGLE S NEST PROJECT

Mining Impacts: A Case Study

Magino Project Environmental Impact Statement. Technical Support Document Water Management Plan

Produced by Oxus International with the help of EcoSafety, and the Biotechnology Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic

Introduction. They can help ensure that all key issues and elements have been considered; They help ensure that the review process is systematic; and

BACKGROUND INFORMATION. for the INITIAL FEDERAL PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. on the

Wharf Resources Heap-Leach Gold Mine Permitting, Northern Black Hills, South Dakota

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES MEETING SUMMARY TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM GRASSY MOUNTAIN GOLD MINE PROJECT

Draft Mine Closure Plan. 17 October 2018 Longlac & Geraldton

APPENDIX A.7F: The Effect of Acid Rock Drainage on Casino Creek

SMARA Reclamation Standards Review

Attachment 1 WORLD BANK ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDELINES 1 MINING AND MILLING UNDERGROUND (INTERIM)

KINROSS 2013 CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT 2013 DATA TABLES 2013 DATA TABLES

APPENDIX E STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

What is the Terms of Reference?

SITING OF ENERGY FACILITIES IN OREGON EFSC Standards in Oregon Administrative Rule

Stibnite Gold Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

Treasury Metals Incorporated Goliath Gold Project Environmental Impact Statement ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT GUIDELINES

2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.0 EIS DEVELOPMENT

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE PREPARATION OF A FOCUS REPORT. Regarding the Goldboro Gold Project Proposed by Anaconda Mining Inc.

Plan Requirement Guidance for Quartz Mining Projects

Hardrock Mining POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO WATER, WILDLIFE, AIR AND LAND. BY BONNIE GESTRING

Page 1 of 6 Permit No: MN R J. Mineral Mining and Dressing

2.0 ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES 2.1 BACKGROUND 2.2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Project Alternatives Identification of Alternatives

Newmont Mining Corporation Tailing & Heap Leach Facility Management Standard

CONCEPT NOTE LARGE VOLUME WASTE

Base Metal and Iron Ore Mining

Regulatory and Permitting. for Metallic Mining in Minnesota

Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation

Preliminary Disclosure; Application for Approval; Operating Permits, Volume 2: Licences and Approvals; and Abandonment Approval and

BERGER PEAT MOSS LIMITED

TAILING & HEAP LEACH FACILITY MANAGEMENT PURPOSE & OBJECTIVES CONTENT. 1. Planning & Design

Appendix 2a CEAA Terms of Reference

Abandoned Mine Waste Repositories: Site Selction, Design, and Cost

Reclamation Manual Design Data Collection Guidelines Chapter 5 Typical Design Data Package Template

NICO COBALT-GOLD-BISMUTH-COPPER PROJECT Community Scoping Session Environmental Overview

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE

APPENDIX 22C: CYANIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN

INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION

Environmental Information Worksheet

Washington Dulles International Airport EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED HORIZON NORTH PIT EXTENSION PROJECT

Environmental Design Criteria for Project Engineering

Responsible Mining in the Lake Superior Basin Dec. 2013

APPENDIX D 2017 PHOTO ESSAY

South Landfill Annual Cover Rate Screening Criteria Checklist

The Gold King Mine Acid Drainage Spill

RECLAMATION PLAN FOR. (name of Mine) MINING OPERATION

24. Closure and Rehabilitation

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY

Environmental Checklist:. 10.Ports and Harbors (1) Yes: Y No: N (a) (b) (c) (d)

APPENDIX M CEQA Initial Study Checklist

Appendix M. Criteria, Measures and Indicators for Effects Assessment

5.0 LONG-TERM CEQA CONSIDERATIONS

3.4 AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS AND FISH SPECIES

List of Monitoring Indicators

Highway 11 Realignment

Proceedings of the 18 th Annual British Columbia Mine Reclamation Symposium in Vernon, BC, The Technical and Research Committee on Reclamation

Environmental characterisation and mine water monitoring

Optimisation Study Yanfolila Gold Project Mali

Dirk J.A. van Zyl, Ph.D., P.Eng. P.E. Tailings and Mine Rock Management

INTEGRA RESOURCES COMMENCES METALLURGICAL TESTWORK PROGRAM AT THE DELAMAR GOLD-SILVER PROJECT

Lone Star Ore Body Development Project Environmental Impact Statement. External Scoping Summary Report

Lab 14. Distribution of Natural Resources: Which Proposal for a New Copper Mine Maximizes the Potential Benefits While Minimizing the Potential Costs?

Chapter 16. Minerals & Mineral Resources

Table 1 Revisions to Bear Lodge Project Plan of Operations February 2014 Plan of Operations Text Section Number Section Name Revision

TERMS OF REFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED S PROPOSED HORIZON NORTH PIT EXTENSION PROJECT

International Assessment of Marine and Riverine Disposal of Mine Tailings 1. Craig Vogt

Donlin Gold Project. Final Environmental Impact Statement CEPOA-RD. P.O. Box 6898 JBER, AK US Army Corps of Engineers

MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN BLACK MESA AND KAYENTA MINES INDEX. Chapter Title Volume

CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 3.0 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY DEFINITION OF IMPACT TYPES

T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s

Musselwhite Mine Sustainability Report

ACID MINE DRAINAGE IN THE AMBLER MINING DISTRICT

DRAFT CH 10 & CH 11 October 7, 2015 From: SLDCProposedAmendmentsBCCPacket part3-1Nsm

MERCURY ON THE KUSKOKWIM OLD AND NEW. Kendra Zamzow, Ph.D. CSP2

Federal and State Water Law. Jennifer Gimbel, CSU Grad592 October 29, 2018

SHELL ONSHORE OPERATING PRINCIPLES

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG LOS ANGELES DISTRICT

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 616. INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER SYSTEMS SUBCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION [AMENDED]

Introduction to Cyanide Gold Mining. ORCR USEPA July 2012

BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT

EIS TABLE OF CONTENTS

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG LOS ANGELES DISTRICT

Matters Arising Chairperson Term of Appointment

An Overview and Comparison of the Tennessee Department of Transportation s Environmental Evaluation Process

methods consist of: activities of The physical the Project surveying; stockpiling; grading; piling and turbine delivery; distribution line; operation

Integrated Mine Waste Storage Concept, Krumovgrad Gold Project, Bulgaria

Leading Practice and Mine Closure Australian Centre for Sustainable Mining Practices

Operations Mine Site, Tote Road and Railway

Chapter 6 Erosion & Stormwater Study Team

EIS Submission: Tom s Gully Underground Project

7 Mineral and Energy Resources

Transcription:

Grassy Mountain Gold Project Environmental Evaluation - Draft Outline EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Brief description of the Applicant s proposed project and concise presentation of the results of the environmental evaluation (EE) including the Alternatives Analysis, Impact Analysis, and Cumulative Impact Analysis. This section will highlight key issues evaluated including identified mitigation measures and remaining unresolved or ongoing subjects (e.g., consultation). A master table may also be included that allows for a comparison of effects by alternative. The section will conclude with a collective findings decision or findings document rather than a record of decision. 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Introduction to the proposed project, structure and content of the EE, and description of the role of the EE in the consolidated permitting process. 1.1 Project Overview Overview of the Applicant s proposed project including ownership, project location and access, proposed operations, infrastructure, and reclamation/closure plans. 1.2 Purpose of the Environmental Evaluation Explanation of the purpose of the EE and an overview of the consolidated permitting process. This section will also include a description of the Project Coordinating Committee (PCC) and Technical Review Team (TRT), as well as their roles in the permitting process. 1.3 Regulatory Frameworks Considered Description of the regulatory framework of the evaluation and permitting process. 1.4 Permits/Decisions to be issued by Agencies Description of the regulatory permitting process, including public and agency meetings that are held. Includes a list of permits that would be required for development, operation, and reclamation of the proposed project. 2 CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ALTERNATIVES Discussion of the systematic procedure used to arrive at the preferred alternative in sufficient detail to allow agencies and the public to evaluate the comparative merits of each alternative, and rationale for elimination of alternatives. A review of the Best Available, Practicable, and Necessary Technology will also be described in this section. 2.1 Project Description 2.1.1 Site Preparation and Construction of Surface Facilities 2.1.1.1 Site Preparation 1

2.1.1.2 Growth Media Storage 2.1.1.3 Invasive Species Control 2.1.1.4 Borrow Areas 2.1.1.5 Construction of Surface Facilities 2.1.2 Underground Mining Methods 2.1.3 Waste Rock Storage 2.1.4 Run-of-mine (ROM) Ore Stockpile 2.1.5 Ore Processing 2.1.5.1 Crushing, Grinding, and Classification 2.1.5.2 Gravity Separation 2.1.5.3 Carbon-in-leach (CIL) cyanide circuit (Reference International Cyanide Code Sections as applicable) 2.1.5.4 Electrowinning Recovery 2.1.5.5 Cyanide Detoxification 2.1.6 Electrical Power 2.1.7 Tailings Disposal and Storage 2.1.8 TSF Reclaim Pond 2.1.9 Water Management and Supply 2.1.9.1 Water Needs 2.1.9.2 Process Water 2.1.9.3 Potable Water 2.1.9.4 Fire Suppression Water 2.1.9.5 Storm Water and Sediment Control Structures 2.1.10 Process Materials and Waste 2.1.11 Access and Haul Roads 2.1.12 Ancillary Facilities 2.1.12.1 Maintenance Shop 2.1.12.2 Warehouse 2.1.12.3 Administration Buildings 2.1.12.4 Security and Fencing 2

2.1.13 Equipment and Schedule 2.1.14 Workforce 2.1.15 Closure and Reclamation 2.1.16 Financial Assurances and Bonding 2.1.17 Monitoring and Applicant-proposed Mitigation 2.1.17.1 Operations Monitoring 2.1.17.2 Post-closure Monitoring 2.2 Alternatives 2.2.1 Methods of Analysis Description of the procedure used to identify and evaluate alternatives. 2.2.2 Alternatives Considered Description of the No Action alternative, the Applicant s proposed project, and alternatives identified. 2.2.2.1 Alternative Locations for mine facilities Including heap leach pads, roads, impoundments, ponds, ore storage areas, and waste disposal areas 2.2.2.2 Alternative Designs, Processes, Operations and Scheduling For mine facilities and operations including, heap leach pads, roads, impoundments, ponds, ore storage areas, and waste disposal areas. Chemical processing alternatives including gravity flotation (initial ore separation and truck transport to Nevada gold extraction facility), froth flotation, and others, as identified. 2.2.2.3 Alternative Water Supplies 2.2.2.4 Alternative Power Supplies 2.2.2.5 Alternative Reclamation Procedures 2.2.3 Alternatives Eliminated Discussion of the alternatives that would not be feasible along with rationale for elimination based on previously described procedure. 2.2.4 Alternatives to Be Carried Through the Environmental Evaluation Discussion of feasible alternatives that will be carried through the analysis of impacts to environmental resources in the EE. 3 CHAPTER 3 IMPACT ANALYSIS Description of the affected environment (existing conditions) for environmental resources, impacts from the proposed project, and alternatives focused on significant effects ( significant will also be defined). This chapter will also analyze the causes and impacts of potential accidents supported by credible scientific evidence, including catastrophic consequences (even if the probability of occurrence is low). Each resource discussion would include the following sub-sections: 3.1 Environmental Resources 3

The resources (Division 37) that will be analyzed in the EE include, but may not be limited to: Vegetation; Soil/overburden; Climate/air quality; Fish, fish habitat and aquatic biology; Wildlife and wildlife habitat; State or federally listed threatened or endangered species and habitat and state sensitive species and habitat; Surface and groundwater; Seismicity; Geology and geologic hazards; Mineralogy and chemistry; Noise; Existing land use and land use designations; Cultural/historical resources; Archaeological resources; Socioeconomic conditions; State scenic waterways, and federal wild, scenic or recreational rivers; Special natural areas including areas designated as areas of critical environmental, research natural areas, outstanding natural areas, and areas designated by the Oregon Natural Heritage Plan. Potential effects on climate change will also be evaluated. For each resource, the following sub-sections would be provided. 3.1.1 Regulatory Context 3.1.2 Method of Analysis 3.1.3 Affected Environment 3.1.4 Impact Analysis 3.1.4.1 No Action Alternative 3.1.4.2 Preferred Action Alternative 3.1.4.3 Alternative A 4 CHAPTER 4 CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS The scope of the cumulative impact analysis will be determined by the TRT in consideration of the alternatives developed, the environmental impacts from the proposed project, and the physical dimension of the proposed mining operation. 4.1 Introduction Explanation of a cumulative impact analysis and the types of actions that are considered in the analysis, including similar actions, connected actions, and separate actions. 4.2 Scope of Cumulative Impact Analysis Description of the area studied and timing considerations of potential effects. 4.3 Identification of Cumulative Actions and Projects Identification of projects and actions to be assessed in the cumulative impacts analysis. 4.4 Cumulative Impacts Assessment Presentation of the results of the cumulative impact assessment including discussion of potential cumulative effects to the same environmental resources evaluated in Chapter 3 in table format. 5 CHAPTER 5 MITIGATION Discussion of mitigation measures identified by the TRT in addition to regulatory standards and requirements (e.g., wildlife mitigation), and in addition to Applicant-proposed measures (e.g., BMPs) that are part of the proposed project. A discussion of financial assurance requirements will also be 4

included in this section. 6 CHAPTER 6 REFERENCES Includes a list of all documents used in the development of the EE. All references will be provided as part of the project administrative record in PDF format. 7 APPENDIX A CYANIDE CHEMISTRY Review of general cyanide chemistry, application in gold mining, specific role for Project, fate and transport, ecological and human health risk, toxicity, standards and practices required by Nevada and Arizona for use in chemical process mining. This material will be presented exclusively in this technical appendix or also provided as a brief summary in the body of the EE report. Appendix B ANALYSIS OF CREDIBLE ACCIDENTS Potential Accidents would include discussion of potential releases of contaminants into the environment as a result of the mine operation or closure; precipitation events and other natural events such as earthquakes that exceed the design standards of the mine facilities; human error; fire; unplanned detonation of explosives; and equipment failures. Address unintentional inhalation of potentially contaminated air at TSF. Incorporate Tetra Tech s findings regarding review of the TSF design or include as separate appendix.. 5