Seismic Design of Cast-in-Place Concrete Diaphragms, Chords and Collectors

Similar documents
Engr. Thaung Htut Aung M. Eng. Asian Institute of Technology Deputy Project Director, AIT Consulting

REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL BOUNDARY ELEMENT LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING TERMINATION

PEER Tall Building Seismic Design Guidelines

ACI paper #2. Presentation Outline. Performance Based Seismic Design of Tall RC Core Wall Buildings: State of Practice on the West Coast of the U.S.

Application of Buckling Restrained Braces in a 50-Storey Building

The International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. Naveed Anwar. ICEES April 2011 NUST, Islamabad Pakistan

Metropolis Mega-Development: A Case Study in Fast-Tracked Performance-Based Seismic Design of High-Rise Concrete Towers in Los Angeles

Effect of Mass and Stiffness of Vertically Irregular RC Structure

Case Study: Challenges of a Single-layer Reticulated Dome

A Comparative Study on Non-Linear Analysis of Frame with and without Structural Wall System

Performance-Based Seismic Evaluation of Wind-Impacted Tall Buildings

Modeling of Shear Walls for Nonlinear and Pushover Analysis of Tall Buildings

PEER/CSSC Tall Building Design Case Study Building #1. J. Andrew Fry John Hooper Ron Klemencic Magnusson Klemencic Associates

Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design

Distribution of Forces in Lateral Load Resisting Systems

SEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE

STRUCTURAL APPLICATIONS OF A REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM-COLUMN-SLAB CONNECTION MODEL FOR EARTHQUAKE LOADING

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SEISMIC EVALUATION PEER REVIEW

LEARNING OF ETABS. 15 ft

MODELLING OF SHEAR WALLS FOR NON-LINEAR AND PUSH OVER ANALYSIS OF TALL BUILDINGS

DIAPHRAGM BEHAVIOR OF DECONSTRUCTABLE COMPOSITE FLOOR SYSTEMS

Calculation of Wind Loads on Structures according to ASCE 7-10

Seismic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Framed Buildings with Columns of Different Heights within One Storey

Seismic Performance of Residential Buildings with Staggered Walls

Response of TBI case study buildings

Seismic Behaviour of RC Shear Walls

SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MULTI-STORY STRUCTURE WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF SLABS

The Effect of Wind Loads on the Seismic Performance of Tall Buildings. By Shilpa Nirman Thilakarathna Naveed Anwar Pramin Norachan Fawad Ahmed Naja

PERFORMANCE BASED EVALUATION OF FRAMED REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS BY PUSHOVER ANALYSIS

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFECT OF INFILL WALLS ON FIXED BASE AND BASE ISOLATED REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A MID RISE RCC BUILDING WITH SOFT STOREY AT GROUND FLOOR

Volume 1. HOW TO MAKE A DREAM HOUSE EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT Contents

Modelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system

SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF RC BUILDING RESTING ON PLAIN AND SLOPING GROUND WITH BRACINGS AND SHEAR WALL

S. Gandhi *1, Syed Rizwan 2

CADS A3D MAX. How to model shear walls

Pushover Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures with Coupled Shear Wall and Moment Frame. *Yungon Kim 1)

A seismic engineer s note book

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 2, No 2, 2011

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor and Ductility Factor of RC Braced Frame

A Study on Seismic Analysis of High Rise Irregular Floor Plan Building with Different Position of Shear Walls

SHAKE TABLE TESTING OF BRIDGE REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS UNDER COMBINED ACTIONS

Seismic Performance Of R C Flat-Slab Building Structural Systems

Seismic Performance Evaluation of an Existing Precast Concrete Shear Wall Building

midas Gen Release Note

PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF R.C.C. FRAMES

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON THE INTERACTION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES WITH PRECAST-PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FLOOR SYSTEMS

30 kip/ft (Dead load) 5 ft. 20 ft

Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Structures

Effect of Diaphragm Openings in Multi-storeyed RC framed buildings using Pushover analysis

NON-LINEAR STATIC PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-STORED BUILDING BY USING ETABS

Special Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls

Chapter 2 Notation and Terminology

EVALUATION OF COLLECTOR DESIGN FOR CONCRETE DIAPHRAGMS

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS. By Ir. Heng Tang Hai

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 10, October ISSN Pushover Analysis of RC Building

Office Building-G. Thesis Proposal. Carl Hubben. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari

SEISMIC EVALUATION AND RETROFIT OF A HOSPITAL BUILDING USING NONLINEAR STATIC PROCEDURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASCE/SEI 41-06

Earthquake Behavior of RCC Building for Various Shear Wall Configurations

Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling & Simulation

Pushover Analysis of High Rise Reinforced Concrete Building with and without Infill walls

Recent Advances in Seismic and Wind Design of Wood Structures &Historic Preservation Examples

PERFORMANCE STUDY OF RETROFITTED GRAVITY LOAD DESIGNED WALL FRAME STRUCTURES (SC-140)

NON-LINEAR STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ANALYSIS

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON DESIGN RESULTS OF A MULTI-STORIED BUILDING USING STAAD PRO AND ETABS FOR REGULAR AND IRREGULAR PLAN CONFIGURATION

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

Linear and Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of a Tall Air Traffic Control (ATC) Tower

Council on Tall Buildings. and Urban Habitat BACKGROUND SECTION STEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALL STEEL PLATE COMPOSITE SHEAR WALL

Assessment of Infill Framed Building Constructed after 2005 Earthquake in Muzzafrabad

In-plane testing of precast concrete wall panels with grouted sleeve

Modeling and Design of Bridge Super Structure and Sub Structure

NONLINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS OF R.C.C. FRAMES (Software Implementation ETABS 9.7)

AISC Live Webinars. Thank you for joining our live webinar today. We will begin shortly. Please standby.

Analysis the Behavior of Building with Different Soft Story

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 10, 2016 ISSN (online):

Thesis Proposal. La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower San Diego, California. December 13, 2013

GUIDELINES ON NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF STEEL MOMENT FRAMES

Alexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #3 November 21,

CUREe-Kajima Flat Plate 1 Kang/Wallace

STRUCTURAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (SEISMIC PROVISIONS) FOR EXISTING BUILDING CONVERTED TO JOINT LIVING AND WORK QUARTERS

Seismic Analysis of High-Rise Building by Response Spectrum Method

Dynamic analysis of RC frame braced tube structure

mortarless Design Manual Part 1 (AS 3600:2009) Section 1 Page 1 AS 3600:2009 PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE - CODE OF PRACTICE

State of Practice of Performance-Based Seismic Design in Korea

PUSHOVER ANALYSIS (NON-LINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS) OF RC BUILDINGS USING SAP SOFTWARE

A Comparison of Basic Pushover Methods

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures

Performance of Multi-story RCC structure with Floating Column

SHEAR BEHAVIOR OF MULTI-STORY RC STRUCTURAL WALLS WITH ECCENTRIC OPENINGS

PARAMETRIC STUDY ON VERTICAL IRREGULAR HIGH RISE REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMED BUILDING

Effect of Shear Wall Sections on Multistorey Building with Satellite Bus-Stop having Floating Columns with Top Soft Storey

Council on Tall Buildings

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 5, Issue 06, 2017 ISSN (online):

MODIFIED STRUCTURAL LAYOUTS FOR STAGGERED TRUSS FRAMING SYSTEMS USED IN SEISMICALLY ACTIVE AREAS

SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS

Seismic Performance of Multistorey Building with Soft Storey at Different Level with RC Shear Wall

A REAL CASE STUDY ABOUT EVALUATION OF THE EXISTING SITUATION OF A POST TENSIONED SINGLE SPAN BOX GIRDER BRIDGE

CASE STUDY OF A 40 STORY BRBF BUILDING LOCATED IN LOS ANEGELES

Static Analysis of Multistoreyed RC Buildings By Using Pushover Methodology

International Journal of Engineering Trends and Applications (IJETA) Volume 5 Issue 5, Sep-Oct 2018

Transcription:

DESIGN OF TALL BUILDINGS: TRENDS AND ADVANCEMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL PEFORMANCE November 10, 2016 Pathumthani, Thailand Seismic Design of Cast-in-Place Concrete Diaphragms, Chords and Collectors Pramin Norachan Manager, Structural Engineering Unit AIT Solutions

Presentation Outline 1. Introduction 2. Overview of Structure 3. Analysis and Design Criteria 4. Force Scaling 5. Section Cuts 6. Forces from Section Cuts 7. Diaphragm Design

Estimating the inelastic properties for a real component is not a simple task. If there is substantial inelastic behavior in an actual structure, the results of an elastic analysis may be of uncertain value for making design decisions, and may even be misleading. PERFORM-3D is an ideal tool for nonlinear performancebased analysis and design, created by Dr. Graham H. Powell, University of California at Berkeley Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering. As a tool for obtaining information for design, even a crude inelastic model can be more useful than an elaborate elastic model. Please keep in mind that the goal is to get useful information for design, not to calculate "exact" response. Pramin Norachan 4

LATBSDC 2014 ACI 318-14 NEHRP (NIST GCR 10-917-4) Pramin Norachan 5

Pramin Norachan 6

Building structures generally comprise structural elements to support gravity and lateral loads. The seismic force-resisting system is composed of vertical elements, horizontal elements, and the foundation. The vertical elements provide a continuous load path to transmit gravity and seismic forces from the upper levels to the foundation. The horizontal elements typically consist of diaphragms, including collectors. Pramin Norachan 7

Diaphragms transmit inertial forces from the floor system to the vertical elements of the seismic force-resisting system. They also tie the vertical elements together to stabilize and transmit forces among these elements as may be required during earthquake shaking. Diaphragms are thus an essential part of the seismic force-resisting system and require design attention by the structural engineer to ensure the structural system performs adequately during earthquake shaking. Pramin Norachan 8

Diaphragm in-plane forces: Diaphragms span between, and transfer forces to, vertical elements of the lateral-force resisting system. Diaphragm transfer forces: Force transfers between vertical elements which have different properties over their height, or their planes of resistance may change from one story to another. A common location where planes of resistance change is at the grade level of a building with an enlarged subterranean plan (podium diaphragm). Pramin Norachan 9

Large diaphragm transfer forces should be anticipated at offsets or discontinuities of the vertical elements of the seismic-force-resisting system. (a) Setback in the building profile (b) Podium level at grade. Pramin Norachan 10

In general, low-rise buildings and buildings with very stiff vertical elements such as shear walls are more susceptible to floor diaphragm flexibility problems than taller structures. Pramin Norachan 11

Pramin Norachan 12

Different parts of a diaphragm include: - Diaphragm slab - Chords - Collectors (Drag struts or Distributors) - Connections to the vertical elements. These different parts can be identified by considering the load path in a simple diaphragm. We can idealize the diaphragm as a simply supported beam spanning between two supports, with reactions and shear and moment diagrams Pramin Norachan 13

40@3.2 = 128 m. 40-Story RC Building Pramin Norachan 15

A B C D E F G H I J K M 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 4 3 2 8.0 3.0 19 m. 8.0 1 88.0 m. Floor Framing Plan Pramin Norachan 16

Material Properties Materials Expected Strength (MPa) Modulus of Elasticity (MPa) Concrete (fc ) - Shear Walls & Columns 80.6 38,642 Concrete (fc ) Girders, Coupling Beams & Slabs 53.8 30,649 Reinforcement Steel (fy) 484 200,000 Sections Properties Shear Walls Columns Girders Coupling Beams Slabs Members Dimension b x h = 400 x 700 mm b x h = 800 x 800 mm b x h = 400 x 700 mm b x h = 800 x 800 mm Thickness = 200 mm Pramin Norachan 17

2014 LATBSDC ** Nonlinear fiber elements automatically account for cracking of concrete because the concrete fibers have zero tension stiffness. Stiffness modifiers for RC diaphragms commonly fall in the range of 0.15 to 0.50 when analyzing the building for design-level earthquake demands (Nakaki, 2000). Pramin Norachan 19

Pramin Norachan 20

Pramin Norachan 21

Base Shear (KN) Comparison of Base Shear 100,000 90,000 89,604 R x = 1.4 80,000 70,000 64,639 71,465 R y = 1.8 60,000 50,000 40,000 38,983 30,000 20,000 y x ug () t 10,000 0 H1 LRHA H2 NLRHA Pramin Norachan 22

Elevation (m) Office Tower (Story Acceleration in X-dir.) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 NLX (g) MCEX/R (g) 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 Story Acceleration (g) Pramin Norachan 23

PERFORM 3D (NLTHA) ETABS (RSA) Before carrying out design checks at MCE, the linear analysis results of ETABS were scaled to match with the nonlinear time-history analysis results (NLTHA) from PERFORM-3D. Pramin Norachan 24

Before scaling - load combinations for MCE level earthquakes U1 = 1.0 DL + 1.0 SDL + 0.25 LL + 1.0 MCEX + 0.3 MCEY U2 = 1.0 DL + 1.0 SDL + 0.25 LL + 0.3 MCEX + 1.0 MCEY After scaling - load combinations multiplied with scaling factors for MCE level earthquakes U1 = 1.0 DL + 1.0 SDL + 0.25 LL + 0.71 MCEX + 0.21 MCEY U2 = 1.0 DL + 1.0 SDL + 0.25 LL + 0.17 MCEX + 0.57 MCEY Pramin Norachan 25

Define the response spectrum function (MCE) that will be used for analysis. Pramin Norachan 27

Define load cases of response spectrum (MCE) in X and Y directions. Pramin Norachan 28

9.81/ 2 4.905 Scale force based on factor obtained from floor acceleration or base shear. Pramin Norachan 29

Define load combinations for diaphragm design at MCE level. Pramin Norachan 30

Floor diaphragm at Story 20 will be used as an example for diaphragm design. Pramin Norachan 32

The force resultants in F11 direction on the floor diaphragm at Story 20 are shown below. SC-1 F22 F11 SC-1 F11 Pramin Norachan 33

Before obtaining forces, section cuts need to be defined. SC-1 SC-1 Pramin Norachan 34

SC-1 Select elements and nodes at the cut line. Then, assign these objects in a group. SC-1 Pramin Norachan 35

Define the section cut (SC-1) by selecting the group (SC-1). Pramin Norachan 36

However, for this presentation, the section cuts of this floor diaphragm are already defined as follows: Pramin Norachan 37

Section cuts for diaphragm chords and shear. DP-L20-01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Moment Pramin Norachan 38

Locations of the section cut for collectors at the core walls. F22 CL-L20-01 F22 CL-L20-02 Pramin Norachan 39

Locations of the section cut for shear friction at the core walls. SF-L20-01 F22 SF-L20-02 F22 Pramin Norachan 40

F22 F11 For a given load case, display any stress of shell force. Pramin Norachan 42

Y X Pramin Norachan 43

Use the option Draw Section Cut to see the force distribution. Pramin Norachan 44

Display the results of section cut forces. Pramin Norachan 45

Pramin Norachan 46

Select the considered load cases and force directions. V M Pramin Norachan 47

Rearrange all information for design. V M Pramin Norachan 48

L01 L20 L39 Pramin Norachan 49

Shear (KN) Moment (KN-m) Story L01-25,000-20,000-15,000-10,000-5,000 0 5,000 10,000 15,000-21749 -6295-7593 -7628-5038 -4446-4518 -4957-6423 -1284-1339 1318 1373 6200 4624 3415 3487 4544 7388 7423 6328 0 10 20 30 40 12719 50 60 70 80 90 Distance (m) 1,500 932 933 1,000 753 603 694 681 420 181 194 258 292 500 0-500 -163-194 -405-276 -307-1,000-572 -734-725 -700-865 -1,500-1000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Pramin Norachan Distance (m) 50

Shear (KN) Moment (KN-m) Story L20-20,000-15627 -15660-12924 -13252-13250 -13008-15,000-8142 -8145-10,000-6165 -2797-2923 -5,000 0 5,000 2911 3036 10,000 8612 15,000 10423 10426 13634 15022 15020 13718 20,000 16853 16887 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Distance (m) 2,000 1486 1312 1282 1263 1,500 915 1,000 691 698 611 224 343 500 177 0-500 -292-177 -275-1,000-548 -753-771 -842-1,500-1369 -1354-1206 -1414-2,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Pramin Norachan Distance (m) 51

Shear (KN) Moment (KN-m) Story L39-30,000-20,000-18565 -25412-27429 -26998-27242 -26998-27440 -25452-18639 -10,000 0 10,000 20,000 30,000-2852 2498 14598 18327 17048 12188 10448 12189 17059 18366 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Distance (m) 2,500 2092 2,000 1655 1280 1437 1569 1,500 958 748 715 726 1,000 196 285 500 0-500 -354-196 -1,000-571 -680-1,500-896 -1267-1103 -1110-2,000-1713 -2,500-1825 -1948 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Pramin Norachan Distance (m) 52 14672-2958 2604

Shear (KN) Moment (KN-m) -30,000-20,000-10,000 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Distance (m) L01 L20 L39 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0-500 -1,000-1,500-2,000-2,500 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Distance (m) L01 L20 L39 Pramin Norachan 53

Inertia Force = m a Shear Wall Chord (Diaphragm) Diaphragm Shear Friction (Support) Shear (Diaphragm) Chord (Diaphragm) Collector (Support) Pramin Norachan 55

Concrete Materials Nominal Strength Expected Strength ' f c f ' c 1.3 f ' c Reinforcing Steel f y f y 1.17 f y Action Demand (D) Capacity (C) Force Controlled (Non-Critical) Force Controlled (Critical) Mu Tu Vu Cu Tension & Flexure M T 1.0 1.5V 1.5C Shear: 1.0 Compression: 1.0 Pramin Norachan 56

M u Analysis ( Section Cut) Pramin Norachan 57

Tension Chord M 16,869 KN m u d 17 m M u 16,869 Tu Cu 992.29 KN d 17 T A f u s y A s 3 Tu 992.29 10 f (1)(484) y 2,050 mm 2 4 2 2 7 DB20 ( As 7 2.0 2,119 mm ) Pramin Norachan 58

Compression chord Use perimeter beam (400x700 mm) 3 992.29 10 u 3.54 MPa (400 700) Allowable stress all ' 0.5 fc 0.5 53.8 10.76 MPa D C u 3.54 0.34 10.76 all Pramin Norachan 59

Pramin Norachan 60

Shear V 1, 485 KN V 1.5 V 1.5 1,485 2,228 KN u V u L 2,228 131 KN / 17 m V n,limit L V L V n u L A L cv ' (200 17, 000) (17 1, 000) 0.66 f (1.0) 0.66 53.8 c 968.2 KN / m A L cv ' (200 17, 000) (17 1, 000) 0.17 f (1.0) 0.17 53.8 c 249.4 KN / m Vn 131 KN / m 249.4 KN / m (Okay) L Pramin Norachan 61

Pramin Norachan 62

Demand Forces T u C u 992 KN 1.5 845 1, 268 KN T A f u s y A s 3 Tu 992 10 f (1)(484) y 2,050 mm 2 4 2 2 5 DB25 ( As 5 25 2, 454 mm ) Pramin Norachan 63

Compression Demand 2t w Cu 1.5 845 1, 268 KN A 2 t t 2(800)(200) mm w slab 2 t w Allowable compression ' (1.0)(0.85)(53.8)(2 200 800) Call (0.85) fc A 14, 634 KN 1,000 D C Cu 1,268 C 14, 634 all 0.09 Pramin Norachan 64

Pramin Norachan 65

Shear Demand Vu 1.5 1,194 1, 791 KN V V A f u n vf y 1, 791 (1.0) A vf (484)(1.0) Avf 1,791 (1.0)(484)(1.0) 3,700 mm 2 A vf L 3,700 8,000 2 0.4625 mm / mm 1 DB12@ 200 A s s 2 12 4 1 0.565 2 mm / 200 mm Pramin Norachan 66

Allowable shear friction V all ' (1.0)(0.2)(53.8)(200 8, 000) (0.2) fcac 17, 216 1,000 min (1.0)(5.5)(200 8, 000) (5.5) Ac 8,800 KN 1,000 8,800 KN KN V 1, 791 KN V 8,800 KN u all Pramin Norachan 67

7-DB20 (Chords) 5-DB25 (Collectors) (2) (6) (7) (6) (2) (4) (2) (6) (7) (6) (2) (2) (6) (7) (6) (2) (2) (2) (6) (7) (6) (2) 7-DB20 (Chords) 1-DB12@200 (Shear Friction) Pramin Norachan 68

Collectors Collector Connection to Shear Wall Pramin Norachan 69

A long collector with confinement reinforcement Shear Friction Rebar Pramin Norachan 70