Thermal evolution of biochar and its physicochemical properties during hydrothermal gasification

Similar documents
Characteristic studies on the waste biomass-based biochars produced by fast pyrolysis

Pyrolysis of residues from well-established biochemical processes for the production of biochar

Analysis of product distribution and characteristics of bio-oil and bio-char from fast pyrolysis of date palm tree waste

Pyrolysis of cotton stalks and utilization of pyrolysis char for sustainable soil enhancement and carbon storage

Behavioral factors affecting the adoption of biochar of farmers in Canada

Carbon sequestration using bio-refinery residues

Production of biochar and development of predictive methods for determining performance in value-added composite materials

Physical properties of charred pellets after two months of storage

A strategy for kinetic parameter estimation in the pyrolysis of lignin

Hydrous pyrolysis of digestate as alternative to post composting in a biowaste anaerobic digestion facility

Production of activated carbon from barley biochar precursor

The influence of biochar on soil characteristics in a temperate agroecosystem

Biochar production through slow pyrolysis of different biomass materials: Seeking the best operating conditions

A three-stage thermochemical conversion process for the production of biochar

Biomass conversion to produce value-added products from agricultural and forestry residues

Life cycle assessment of biochar production from southern pine

Biochar-ammonium phosphate as an uncoatedslow release fertilizer in sandy soil

The effects of biochar as a soil amendment on soil quality and plant growth

Biochar quality management

Adsorption of Ammonium (NH4+) Ions onto various Vietnamese biomass residue-derived biochars (wood, rice husk and bamboo)

Novel Ni-based catalysts for the hydrotreatment of fast pyrolysis oil

Alcohol production from pyrolytic sugars obtained from selective fast pyrolysis of pretreated wood

Agronomic benefits and detriments of using biochar

Autothermal biochar production and characterization at pilot scale

Overview of biochar for electrochemistry applications

Evaluation of Tucumã Endocarp (Astrocaryum Aculeatum) as a New Biomass Resource for Application in Thermal Conversion Processes

Future sludge treatment: Hydrothermal Carbonisation (HTC)

ECI Digital Archives. Engineering Conferences International. Waled Suliman Washington State University, USA

Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass

MULTI-WASTE TREATMENT AND VALORISATION BY THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES. Francisco Corona Encinas M Sc.

ECI Digital Archives. Engineering Conferences International. Georg Ardissone Hochschule Geisenheim University, Germany

The best approach for the conversion job; biological thermochemical or both?

Microwave assisted pyrolysis of kraft lignin at reduce pressure in a multimode oven

Mobile organic compounds in biochar. Relationships with carbonization degree and biooil composition

Biochar characterization and EU27 law harmonization: REFERTIL results

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for

Developing biosensors as monitoring tools to assess the performance of biochar amended contaminated soil

The hydrothermal decomposition of biomass and waste to produce bio-oil

Integrating Pyrolysis and Anaerobic Digestion in a Novel Biorefinery Concept

Green aromatic bulk-chemicals from lignin pyrolysis vapours

Microalgae Biofuels and Carbon Cycling

Biomass and Biofuels. Biomass

Hydrogen from Renewable Fuels by Autothermal Reforming: Alcohols, Carbohydrates, and Biodiesel

Agricultural Waste Utilization Systems

Cleaning biomass generated syngas: is biochar a cheaper alternative to expensive catalysts? Ajay Kumar Oklahoma State University

Catalytic ash free coal gasification in a fluidized bed thermogravimetric analyzer

Effect of particle size on enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated miscanthus

Sulfur speciation and partitioning during thermochemical conversion of cellulosic biomass to biofuel

Drying, devolatilization & char oxidation of solid fuel

Gasification Research at OSU

The Effects of Liquid Properties and Bed Hydrodynamics on the Distribution of Liquid on Solid Fluidized Particles in a Cold-Model Fluidized Bed

NSERC Strategic Network for Canadian Bio-Carbon Research and Applications. Bio-C Net OVERVIEW

Supercritical water gasification of macroalgae

Design and Operation of Biomass Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler with High Steam Parameter

Thrust 2: Utilization of Petroleum Refinery Technology for Biofuel Production. Prof. Chunshan Song, Penn State Douglas C.

Pyrolysis and Gasification

SOME CHALLENGES OF BIOMASS

Clean hydrogen rich gas from catalytic steam gasification of biomass

ENABLING SYNTHESIS OF BIOBASED CHEMICALS & FUELS

Green Fuels for Arctic Maritime Vessels. SAQIB SOHAIL TOOR, PhD Associate Professor Department of Energy Technology Aalborg University, Denmark

Solid Carbon Conversion (Biomass & MSW) via CO 2

Effect of Pressure and Heating Rates on Biomass Pyrolysis and Gasification

Mikko Hupa Åbo Akademi Turku, Finland

Catalytic pyrolysis of straw biomasses (wheat, flax, oat and barley straw) and the comparison of their product yields

Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass for production of densified solid fuel

Biomass Conversion Technologies

HIGH TEMPERATURE AIR/STEAM GASIFICATION OF STEAM EXPLODED BIOMASS

Optimization of biomethanization processes through trace metals supplementation

bio-oil produced from composted lignocellulosic biomass

CREATIVITY AND EXPERTISE to develop solutions for the marine industry. Green Tech 2016 Marine fuels from forest biomass

Conversion of Biomass Particles

Biomass to Energy Conversions -Thermochemical Processes-

International Workshop on Bioenergy Policies, Technologies and Financing

Biochar from gasification in cultivated soils and riparian buffer zones: Chemical characterization

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPARISON OF THERMOCHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL WAYS FOR PRODUCING ENERGY FROM AGRICULTURAL SOLID RESIDUES: COFFEE CUT-STEMS CASE

Development of clean coal technology by using the feature of oxy-fuel combustion

Chemistry of Fossil Fuels and Biofuels

Pyrolysis, Char and Energy

Two-stage Gasification of Untreated and Torrefied Wood

Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) for Solid Recovery of Organic Fractions in Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW)

Fuel Analysis and Burning Characteristics

The Next Generation of Biofuels

Thermal Conversion of Animal Manure to Biofuel. Outline. Biorefinery approaches

HYBRID STAGED THERMOLYSIS TO VALORISE BIOMASS Paul de Wild, March 11, 2009

Fixed Bed Pyrolysis of Waste Plastic for Alternative Fuel Production

HYDROCARBON INDUSTRIAL. Pni. Handbook of. ^m r11?* f 1 ^» La 1 J ELSEVIER. JAMES G. SPEIGHT PhD, DSc AMSTERDAM BOSTON NEW YORK

Biomass Conversion in Supercritical Water

Fast Pyrolysis as Pretreatment for Further Upgrading of Biomass

Renewable Natural Gas via Catalytic Hydrothermal Gasification of Wet Biomass

Different Aspects of Biomass Pyrolysis: A General Review

Thermochemical Technology Overview

Exploring Deployment Options for Short Rotation Woody Cropping Systems

Biomass Electricity. Megan Ziolkowski November 29, 2009

Biogas Conversionh using Dielectric Barrier Discharge Non-thermal Plasma

UNIT 5. Biomass energy

Characterization Study of Kütahya-Tunçbilek Lignite During Oxygen Enriched Combustion

Energy Densification via Hydrothermal Pre-Treatment of Cellulosic Biomass

Pyrolysis for Biochar Production

The National Bioenergy Center and Biomass R&D Overview

Liquefaction Waste carob and Potato. Ana Patrícia Viana Ventura. Instituto Superior Técnico. June 2016

Transcription:

Engineering Conferences International ECI Digital Archives Biochar: Production, Characterization and Applications Proceedings 8-20-2017 Thermal evolution of biochar and its physicochemical properties during hydrothermal gasification Sonil Nanda York University, Canada Ajay K. Dalai University of Saskatchewan, Canada Franco Berruti ICFAR, Western University, Canada Janusz A. Kozinski York University, Canada Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.engconfintl.org/biochar Part of the Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Sonil Nanda, Ajay K. Dalai, Franco Berruti, and Janusz A. Kozinski, "Thermal evolution of biochar and its physicochemical properties during hydrothermal gasification" in "Biochar: Production, Characterization and Applications", Franco Berruti, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada Raffaella Ocone, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK Ondrej Masek, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Eds, ECI Symposium Series, (2017). http://dc.engconfintl.org/biochar/25 This Abstract and Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Proceedings at ECI Digital Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biochar: Production, Characterization and Applications by an authorized administrator of ECI Digital Archives. For more information, please contact franco@bepress.com.

Thermal Evolution of Biochar and its Physicochemical Properties during Hydrothermal Gasification of Biomass Sonil Nanda 1, Ajay K. Dalai 2, Franco Berruti 3 & Janusz A. Kozinski 1 1 Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Canada 2 Dept. of Chemical & Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Canada 3 Institute for Chemical and Fuels from Alternative Resources (ICFAR), Western University, Canada ECI Biochar: Production, Characterization and Applications

Introduction Dependence on fossil fuels as the main energy sources has led to serious energy crisis and environmental problems. Waste biomass is a potential renewable energy source to meet the increasing energy demands. Biomass can be converted to biofuels by BTL (pyrolysis, liquefaction and fermentation) and BTG (gasification) technologies. Hydrogen is renewable, non-toxic, clean fuel and highly energy efficient source. 2

Energy crops Definition: Any plant grown as a low-cost and low-maintenance harvest used for making biofuels or combusted for its energy content to generate heat or electricity. Ideal traits of an energy crop: Fast growing, short rotation and high yield Be able to grow in marginal or degraded lands Low requirement of intensive agricultural practices No competition with food crops for land and nutrients Examples: Wood-based energy crops: Willow and poplar Grasses: switch grass, elephant grass and timothy grass 3

Supercritical water gasification Water at temperature > 374 C and pressure > 22.1 MPa is called supercritical water. Physical and chemical characteristics such as ion product, density, dielectric constant and viscosity of supercritical water are greatly different from either extreme state of the gas phase or the liquid phase. Advantages: No biomass drying required Better solvation of organics Negligible or no toxic byproducts Hydrogen-rich synthesis gas products 4

Timothy grass: Biochemical characterization 34.2 30.1 Weight % 18.1 16.5 1.1 High cellulose and hemicellulose (~64.3 wt.%) indicates high sugar content. Good for bioconversion Extractives include tannin, terpens, terpenoids, lipids, fatty components etc. 5

Timothy grass: Thermogravimetric analysis Moisture and volatiles evolution Char production 6

Experimental Objectives To study the gasification potentials of timothy grass as a model biomass for energy crops. To study the effects of different gasification parameters: o Temperature (450-650 C) o Feed concentration (1:4 and 1:8 biomass-to-water ratio) o Reaction time (15-45 min) To enhance H 2 yields by the application of homogeneous alkali catalysts and study the effect of their concentrations (1-3 wt%) o KOH o NaOH o K 2 CO 3 o Na 2 CO 3 Characterize the biochar generated at different temperatures to determine their thermal and physicochemical properties. 7

Supercritical water gasification Add Sample Thermocouple Relief valve Pressurizing Heating Filter Gas drying filter Gas-liquid separator Reactor N 2 Gas sampling Furnace Separation Gas sample Liquid product Char CONTROL SYSTEM

Effects of temperature and feed concentration (45 min) 1:4 Biomass-to-water ratio 1:8 Biomass-to-water ratio 7.00 9.00 GAS YIELD (MMOL/G) 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 GAS YIELD (MMOL/G) 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 450 550 650 0.00 450 550 650 TEMPERATURE ( O C) TEMPERATURE ( O C) H2 CO CO2 CH4 C2H6 H2 CO CO2 CH4 C2H6 Better free radical mechanism H 2 yield: 1:4 BTW (1.04-4.08 mmol/g) < 1:8 BTW (1.14-5.15 mmol/g). Higher gas yields at 650 C than at 450 C. CO yield decreased at 650 C due to water-gas shift reaction.

Effect of temperature (45 min, 1:8 BTW ratio) Total gas yield Lower heating value 18.0 17.2 2500 2207 16.0 Gas yield (mmol/g) 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 7.0 11.3 LHV (kj/nm3) 2000 1500 1000 500 541 1528 2.0 0.0 0 450 550 650 450 550 650 Temperature ( o C) Temperature ( o C) Total gas yields increased from 7 mmol/g at 450 C to 17.2 mmol/g at 650 C LHV increased from 541 kj/nm 3 at 450 C to 2207 kj/nm 3 at 650 C

Effect of reaction time and feed concentration (650 C) 1:4 Biomass-to-water ratio 1:8 Biomass-to-water ratio 7.00 9.00 GAS YIELD (MMOL/G) 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 GAS YIELD (MMOL/G) 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 15 30 45 0.00 15 30 45 REACTION TIME (MIN) REACTION TIME (MIN) H2 CO CO2 CH4 C2H6 H2 CO CO2 CH4 C2H6 Better water-gas shift reaction H 2 yield: 1:4 BTW (1.75-4.08 mmol/g) < 1:8 BTW (2.7-5.15 mmol/g) H 2 yield increased at 45 min than 15 min due to hydrogenation reaction. Better water-gas shift reaction at 45 min.

Effect of reaction time (650 C, 1:8 BTW ratio) Total gas yields Lower heating value 18.0 17.2 2500 2207 Gas yields (mmol/g) 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 11.6 13.0 Gas yields (mmol/g) 2000 1500 1000 500 1451 1744 2.0 0.0 0 15 30 45 15 30 45 Reaction time (min) Reaction time (min) Total gas yields increased from 11 mmol/g at 15 min to 17.2 mmol/g at 45 min LHV increased from 1451 kj/nm 3 at 15 min to 2207 kj/nm 3 at 45 min

Effect of catalysts (650 o C, 45 min, 1:8 BTW ratio) KOH Better hydrogenation, water-gas shift reaction NaOH Better methanation reaction

Effect of catalyst (650 C, 45 min, 1:8 BTW ratio) TOTAL GAS YIELD (MMOL/G) LOWER HEATING VALUE (KJ/NM 3 ) 27.2 28.8 28.5 30.6 4083 4137 4677 4315 17.2 2207 No catalyst Na2CO3 K2CO3 NaOH KOH No catalyst Na2CO3 K2CO3 NaOH KOH Total gas yield: KOH > K 2 CO 3 > NaOH > Na 2 CO 3 LHV: NaOH > KOH > K 2 CO 3 > Na 2 CO 3

Proximate and ultimate analysis of timothy grass biomass and biochars (45 min, 1:8 BTW ratio) Parameter Timothy grass Biochar-450 C Biochar-550 C Biochar-650 C Proximate analysis (wt%) Moisture 6.2 3.5 2.9 2.0 Ash 4.1 8.6 10.1 13.2 Volatile matter 71.4 58.4 46.6 37.4 Fixed carbon 18.3 29.5 40.4 47.4 Ultimate analysis (wt%) C 47.4 61.2 69.7 75.1 H 6.8 5.4 4.1 3.7 N 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.7 S 0.1 0.05 0.04 0.04 O b 40.4 23.6 15.1 7.3 HHV (MJ/kg) 18.6 24.9 26.2 28.9 15

SEM analysis of biochars (45 min, 1:8 BTW ratio) More cracked surface 16

FTIR analysis of biochars (45 min, 1:8 BTW ratio) Aromatics Alcohols, esters, ethers Carbonyls Alkanes Alkynes High gasification temperature led to the removal of alkanes, alkynes, alcohols, esters, ethers and carbonyls from biomass in biochars due to dehydration of organic functional groups (C O, C=O and C H). Biochar at 650 C become more aromatic with the increase in C C and C H groups. High temperature led to formation of aromatic biochars due to dehydration, dehydrogenation, demethanation, decarboxylation and decarbonylation of organic components. 17

Raman spectroscopy of biochars (45 min, 1:8 BTW ratio) Biochar-450 C Band S S L D V L G R G Assignment C H Hydroaromatic rings C C Aromatic rings C C Highly ordered carbon C H Methylene or methyl Amorphous carbon structure C=C Alkenes, Crystalline carbon structures Biochar-650 C Biochar at 650 C showed the removal of hydroaromatic rings (S band), and methylene groups (V L band). Thermal cracking and dehydrogenation caused aromatization of biochar with the increase in crystalline carbon structures, e.g. C-C (D band), C=C (G band). 18

Conclusions Temperature played a major role leading to hydrothermal cracking of timothy grass with highest gas yields at 650 C. The carbon content in the biochar and heating value increased with the rise in temperature. Lower feed concentration (1:8 BTW ratio) resulted in higher H 2 yields due to free-radical mechanism and water-gas shift reaction. Reaction time of 45 min was optimal for higher H 2 yields, total gas yields with greater LHV of the gas products. 3 wt% KOH resulted in highest yields of H 2 due to higher water-gas shift reaction, while 3 wt% NaOH enhanced methanation reaction with higher CH 4 yields. As the temperature increased from 450 to 650 C, extreme thermal denaturation of biochar through dehydration, bond breakages and formation of transformational products resulted in their aromatization. 19

Acknowledgements Funding sources NSERC Canada Research Chair program Research facilities Lassonde School of Engineering, York University Saskatchewan Structural Sciences Centre, University of Saskatchewan 20