Expediting VI Assessments & Remedies with High Res Data

Similar documents
Expediting Vapor Intrusion Assessments Using High Resolution Continuous Monitoring

Resolving Vapor Intrusion Challenges via Automated Continuous Real-Time Monitoring and Response

New Insights Into Exposure Through Preferential Pathway Vapor Migration

Fast-Track Vapor Intrusion Assessments Using HAPSITE Portable GC-MS

Building Pressure Cycling for Vapor Intrusion Assessment

Risk Management Strategies to Address Vapor Intrusion Assessment and Mitigation Uncertainties Robert Ettinger Geosyntec Consultants

VI Investigations in North Carolina What We ve Learned. Delonda Alexander NC Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act Program

Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. For More Information

Practical Aspects of VI Assessment for TCE. Acknowledgments and special thanks to:

The IAQ/Mold Assessment Getting it Right! Controlling Your Risk

Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex

Background. NCP Early or Interim Actions 5/3/2017. Current Ohio EPA Response Action Levels and Time Frames for TCE at Vapor Intrusion Sites in Ohio

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Methods & Strategies

Mass Flux Characterization for Vapor Intrusion Assessment

Case Study of TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air and the Effects of Ventilation on Entry Routes

INDOOR AIR INVESTIGATION

Vapor Intrusion Panel Discussion. SCRD Fall 2009 Meeting Terry Evanson Wisconsin DNR,

Vapor Intrusion into Large Buildings

Rapid, Efficient Delineation From VI Potential of A Large Soil Gas Plume Using HAPSITE and Other Lines of Evidence

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation. ITRC Shaping the Future of Regulatory Acceptance

PM STRAUSS & ASSOCIATES Energy and Environmental Consulting MEMORANDUM

Best management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions

EPA Vapor Intrusion Update

Case Studies of Innovative Use of Tracers, Indicators and Field GC/MS for Assessing the Vapor Intrusion Pathway

Eric M. Nichols, PE Amy Goldberg Day

SOUTHWEST DIVISION Comparing Air Measurements and Modeling Results at a Residential Site Overlying a TCE Plume October 18, 2004

Example Application of Long Term Stewardship for the Chlorinated Vapor Intrusion Pathway (and VOC sources)

Understanding Building Materials Contribution to Indoor Air Quality

THE STATUS OF VAPOR INTRUSION ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION IN OREGON

Oregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings

Update - Vapor Intrusion and Mitigation in Florida

Kansas Drycleaning Program. kdheks.gov

Use of Crawl Space Sampling Data and Other Lines of Evidence for Evaluating Vapor Intrusion

Use of Building Pressure Cycling in Vapor Intrusion Assessment

Attenuation of Hydrocarbon Vapors from LNAPL Under Residential and Commercial/Industrial Buildings

Lessons from Large Groundwater Plume Sites Redfield and Wall

RISK BULLETIN. Vapor Intrusion An Emerging Environmental Liability WHAT IS VAPOR INTRUSION?

Vapor intrusion state of the art

Increasing Availability of Continuous and Real-Time VOC Monitoring Technologies for VI Assessment

ESTCP Research on Optimization of Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Systems in Large Military Buildings

Southern Cleaners & Laundry Jacksonville, North Carolina. CASE STUDY Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Evaluation and Risk Assessment

Updated Approaches for Monitoring Strategies/Options for Long Term Protection from CVI (under RCRA Corrective Action)

i-admin /15/14 2 of 3 Doc Type: Board Memo/Issue Statement

Sustainability; in Residential, Commercial and Industrial Buildings

A Review for the US Navy of Best Practices, Knowledge and Data Gaps, and Research Directions for Vapor Intrusion

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation: Answering the Common Questions Plaguing Brownfield Developers West Virginia Brownfields Conference

PVI Risk Pathway: Sampling Considerations

A Rational Approach to Vapor Intrusion Preferential Pathways

Vapor Intrusion - Site Characterization and Screening. NEWMOA Workshop on Vapor Intrusion Chelmsford, MA April 12, 2006

Quantitative Decision Framework for Vapor Intrusion Evaluation in DoD Industrial Buildings - Based on an Empirical Database

MPCA Site Assessment: Vapor Intrusion Investigation. Remediation Division Superfund Unit 1

Risk and Required Mitigation

H&P Breakfast Seminar

Is this the maturation Phase of Vapor Intrusion Investigations?

Design of Below Sub-slab Vapour Management System for a Commercial Building

TRANSPORT PATHWAY EVIDENCE OF A SEWER VAPOR. Findings from Work Performed at the Indianapolis USEPA Research Duplex

Part 3 Fundamentals. Most Common VI Bloopers. Handy Unit Conversions:

Presented at Vapor Intrusion Conference: Legal, Technical and Regulatory Perspectives, Cary, North Carolina, January 2014

PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance

A Review of Preferential Pathway Case Studies: Lessons-Learned for Vapor Intrusion Site Assessment

Evaluation of Spatial and Temporal Variability in VOC Concentrations at Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sites.

Remedial Methods for Mitigating Vapour Intrusion to High Density Urban Developments

Part 4 - Methods to Assess VI. Factors Complicating VI Assessments. Ingredients for Effective VI Assessments

Vapor Intrusion Update: Separating the Environmental exposure from Indoor Air Quality Issues Guidance

EPA S 2015 vapor intrusion guides What do they mean for your facility?

Evaluation of VI Data Relative to Separation Distance Screening Criteria A Michigan Case Study

Intensive Study of VOCs and Radon in a Historical Duplex A First Look

Vapor Intrusion Basics

Diagnosing Vapor Intrusion Occurrence, Impact, and Contributing Pathways

The Future of Vapor Intrusion (VI)

Field Methods to Distinguish Between Vapor Intrusion and Indoor Sources of VOCs

FACTS ABOUT: Vapor Intrusion

Conceptual Site Model for Mercury Impacted Soil and Groundwater as a Tool for Effective Remediation

Ask The Expert Webinar Series Vapor Intrusion Assessments Part Two: Improving Data Quality Using Today s Best Practices for Sample Analysis

IPEC Conference San Antonio, TX November 13, 2013 Glenn Nicholas Iosue

Outdoor Temperature and Differential Temperature as Indicators for Timing of VI Sampling to Capture the RME

Vapor Intrusion: Due Diligence Issues

An Integrated Model for Design of Soil Vapour Intrusion Mitigation Systems

MEMO. Kris Hinskey

Risk-Based Clean-Up in Georgia Under the VRP Vapor Intrusion

SOIL VAPOR INTRUSION Frequently Asked Questions

Use of Soil-Gas Data in Vapor Intrusion Decisions

TCE Havertown Site Vapor Intrusion Assessment

Calculation of Site Specific Groundwater to Indoor Air Volatilization Factors (GIVFs)

Vapor Intrusion Pathway Screening for Soil Excavation Remedies

MEMORANDUM. To: Billy Meyer. Christie Zawtocki, PE Kitty Hiortdahl, EI. Date: March 12, 2015

Examples of Data Collection Strategies and Methods

RISK BASED CLOSURE ALTERNATIVE TO REMEDIATION AT AN URBAN SITE. Brian H. Hackett CP, EMS LLC January 17, 2011

NJDEP Vapor Intrusion Guidance

Temperature and Vapor Intrusion Evaluation

Soil Gas Sampling for Vapor Intrusion Assessments: Key Issues

MEMORANDUM. To: Billy Meyer. Christie Zawtocki, PE Timothy Klotz. Date: April 8, 2014

Soil Gas Analytical Methods (Overview, TAGA, Forensics)

Armen Cleaners Indoor Air Quality Investigation. Jon Gulch, OSC U.S. EPA, Region V, ERB

Vapor Intrusion Assessment. Kaitlyn S. Rhonehouse, P.E. Florida Brownfield Association 16 th Annual Conference, Brownfields in Motion

Testing Is Easy And Inexpensive

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SOLUTIONS FOR BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT. Jordan Kleine, MPA Southeast US District Manager

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Soil Vapor Extraction Subsurface Performance Checklist

Five Vapor Intrusion Sites in New York State Lenny Siegel August, 2007

Transcription:

500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 TCE Expediting VI Assessments & Remedies with High Res Data TCE Blayne Hartman Ph.D. AEHS San Diego March 2018 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Mark Kram, Ph.D. Cliff Frescura 0 100 200 300 400 www.hartmaneg.com www.groundswelltech.com Presented at AEHS Conference in San Diego in March 2018 Lecture notes are at the bottom of each slide so that if played out as a hardcopy, the presentation can be a useful reference document.

The Fundamental Problem with VI Investigations & Solutions Sample Event 1 The Song? Sample Event 2 Are Limited VI Data Any Different? Sample Event #3 The fundamental problem with vapor intrusion assessments is that you are trying to determine whether there is a potential problem with only a few data points. It s like trying to figure out what song you are listening to with only 3 few short blasts. It can t be done in a time-efficient manner which is why VI investigations can take months or even years to conclude.

Presentation Summary Brief System Description Expediting VOC Entry Points Expediting VI Assessments Expediting VI Remedies Special Treat at the End The following topics will be covered in this presentation.

Continuous Monitoring System Sample Inlets 12 High Photo of the Vaporsafe monitoring system. The instrument is about the size of a microwave and can fly around as checked baggage for less than $100.

System Capability Fully Quantitative! Can Reach Ultra-Low Levels (<1 ug/m3) for TCE, PCE, Vinyl Chloride & others <10 min Analysis Time for TCE & PCE Multiple Sample Locations (16 to 30) Very Stable - holds calibration for months Real-Time Data - Groundswell Software Discrete Sampling Mode VaporSafe monitoring system capabilities. Fully quantitative (not screening level data), measures the most critical compounds, can do that in 10 minutes and can monitor 16 or more locations. The data are sent to the web after every analysis to a server with a user-friendly interface enabling the client real-time data. The system can also be put in discrete sample mode enabling the user to look for VOC entry points or to collect samples if an unexpected compound occurs.

Monitoring of Other Variables BP, Indoor pressure, Differential Pressure Wind Speed, temperature, other climatic Can Turn On-Off 115 V Relays 6 The system also measures barometric pressure, sub-foundation (differential) pressure, and other climatic variables such as temperature. It can accept data from air-monitoring stations and/or from the local airport. Finally, the system can trigger 115 volt relays when VI conditions occur (e.g., indoor air exceedances or sub-foundation pressure increases). These relays can be used to turn on fans, increase the HVAC, open louvers, collect a canister sample and other instant response actions. 6

User Friendly Web-Based Data A picture of the user-friendly interface. Contour plots, plots of concentration versus time, stacked plots, and auto-alerts are all available from the dashboard. Plots can be easily exported into a jpeg file or into a ppt for rapid display to interested parties. 7

Expedited Source Identification Identify VOC Entry Points Source from VI vs Indoor Unexpected VOCs Superior to Hapsite Screening Much more data collected over time More robust; less downtime No more expensive Another common application of the system is to locate VOC entry points into buildings. Why not just due this with grab samples using an instrument such as a Hapsite? Well you can, but we are finding that at most sites, there is a significant variation in indoor air concentrations over the course of hours. If that is the case, then a single screening measurement at a location may miss a potential exceedance. But with Vaporsafe, the system can monitor multiple locations overnight giving a much more representative dataset identifying VOC entry points. And, it is no more expensive than 8 hours of screening with another instrument.

18 16 VOC Entry Point Determination Room 103 Indoor Air TCE (ug/m 3 ) Door Opened 8:00 am 14 12 10 ug/m 3 8 6 Room Closed:17:00 4 2 15 hours Door Closed 8:20 am 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time Here s an example of locating VOC entry points in one overnight sampling period. This plot shows indoor air TCE concentrations in a small room after the room was closed up for 15 hours. The continuous increase in TCE indoor air values documented that the room was the entry point for the TCE and the total mass entering the room (mass flux) could be calculated. At 8 am the next morning, the doors to the room were opened and an immediate drop was detected. The doors were closed again at 8:20 and concentrations immediately began to increase again. Imagine doing this at 16 locations in a building. You could readily see which locations showed increases and to what magnitude.

Expedited VI Assessments Can see pattern within days Can determine if from VI or indoor source Can determine cause & effect How often above screening level Pattern = Opportunity 10 Perhaps the greatest benefit of monitoring is the ability to expedite vapor intrusion assessments. Most agencies want a minimum of two indoor air sampling rounds, 6-months apart. But with monitoring data, a temporal pattern can be seen and cause-and effect might be recognized within days. This will allow implementation of a remedy and can possibly eliminate the need for a future sampling round. 10

Short-Term TCE Assessment Options Time-Integrated Sample One number over sampling period No real-time feedback Costly if multiple rooms, multiple events Can t see the pattern Continuous Analyzers Can determine duration: hours? Days? Long Term Passive/Canister Can see the pattern! Day vs night? HVAC? There are 2 options for assessing the short-term TCE exposure. One is to collect a sample over a period of time, such as a 21 day exposure period. However time-averaged samples have serious limitations, such as incorrect exposure period for non-residential receptors, no resolution (only 1 data point) and no real-time feedback. If the exposure period of concern is 24 hours or a few days, these samples also become prohibitively expensive. The second option is to use continuous analyzers. Continuous analyzers offer many benefits over long-term average samples, especially the ability to recognize the concentration pattern over time.

Shop Air PCE June 2014 Office Area (P2) 50 PCE Concentration (ug/m3) and Temperature (degrees Celcius) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 PCE PCE IA Data from First 24 hours 6/6/14 12:00 6/6/14 15:00 6/6/14 18:00 6/6/14 21:00 6/7/14 0:00 6/7/14 3:00 6/7/14 6:00 6/7/14 9:00 Sample Date/Time 6/7/14 12:00 6/7/14 15:00 6/7/14 18:00 6/7/14 21:00 Indoor air data from an operating business in Phoenix in June 2014. This plot shows the fist 24 hours of data collected. PCE values increased in the middle of the night from less than 5 ug/m3 up to 30 ug/m3 and then dropped back down in the morning. Cause was unclear.

Print Shop Air - PCE June 2014 80 Office Area (P2) 70 60 50 ug/m3 40 30 PCE 20 10 0 1 21 41 61 81 101 121 141 161 181 201 221 241 261 281 301 321 341 361 381 401 421 441 461 481 501 521 541 561 581 Run # 14 days of PCE concentrations inside the Print Shop: every night values increased, but were low during the day. The pattern allowed the determination that the increased PCE values at night were due to the HVAC system (perhaps less positive pressure at night when the system ran at a reduced rate?). Further, the continuous monitoring showed that values were below allowable levels during the period when people were working.

Typical Data After 14 Days 80 Office Area (P2) 70 60 50 ug/m3 40 30 20 15 ug/m3 PCE 10 0 1 21 41 61 81 101 121 141 161 181 201 221 241 261 281 301 321 341 361 381 401 421 441 461 481 501 521 541 561 581 Run # The dot in red shows the results if you had deployed a time-averaged sample for 14-days. The single value would have been biased high & indicated a problem. A false positive. But equally important: a single data point does not show you a pattern so that you have no opportunity to try and determine cause-and-effect.

Freon 11 - Office Bldg 1 Day Freon-11 in indoor air over 24 hours in an office building constructed over a known Freon-11 subsurface source. Large variation (8x) and a strange pattern. 15

Freon 11 - Office Bldg 2 Days Freon-11 in indoor air over 48 hours in the office building. The pattern repeats itself. 16

Freon 11 - Office Bldg 10 Days Freon-11 in indoor air over ~10 days in the office building. The pattern was consistent from day to day and was a result of the HVAC system. 17

Temporal Variation SD Facility 500 Same Time Every Day 450 400 350 300 300 ug/m3 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 tce Six days of continuous monitoring of TCE at another large commercial warehouse in San Diego. The huge increases occur at about the same time every day. What is causing this to happen?

Large Industrial Facility Definite Correlation with Differential Pressure Apparent Correlation with Barometric Pressure Comparison of the indoor TCE values to barometric pressure shows an increase in TCE concentrations when there is a drop in barometric pressure (probably due to ocean temperature effects). Comparison of the indoor TCE values to sub-foundation pressure shows a direct correlation between indoor air concentrations to positive pressure under the slab. Knowing these patterns, remedies can be designed and implemented. 19

Former Dry Cleaner PCE BP WS 20 Indoor air PCE concentration, barometric pressure and wind speed from a former dry cleaner converted to a retail office building over a 3-day period. The large increase in PCE seems to correlate with a drop in barometric pressure and an increase in wind speed. 20

Former Dry Cleaner - Bathroom Indoor air PCE concentrations in the bathroom in the same building. The flat periods occurred at night when the building was empty. Every morning the values increased when the bathroom was being used. The increases were likely due to turning on the exhaust fan in the bathroom. Again, the concentration pattern enabled the cause to be determined. 21

TCE Source Determination Manufacturing Facility TCE 500 450 400 350 300 250 TCE 200 150 100 5:00 pm 7:00 am 7:00 am 5:00 pm 5:00 pm 50 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 TCE indoor air concentrations in a furniture manufacturing facility. Concentrations were low at night, but then increased during the work day. If vapor intrusion was the source, values should have increased at night when the facility was closed up. The opposite was observed. This concentration pattern enabled the conclusion that the TCE was from an indoor source, which was later identified. Without the concentration pattern, this conclusion could never have been reached.

Expedited VI Remedies Can try various remedies & see effects HVAC modifications Fans on/off Air filtration units Sealing sumps & cracks Can put VI Issue to Rest in Days Rather than Months or Years!! 23 Perhaps the greatest benefit of monitoring is the ability to expedite vapor intrusion assessments. Most agencies want a minimum of two indoor air sampling rounds, 6-months apart. But with monitoring data, a temporal pattern can be seen and cause-and effect might be recognized. This will allow implementation of a remedy and can possibly eliminate the need for a future sampling round. This is huge for real estate transactions where time is money. 23

TCE Urgent Response Options Air Filtration Costs ~ $1,000/unit Sealing Floor Cracks Hard to find them all Relocate People Could open Pandora s box HVAC Modification How to know if effective? Continuously Monitor Determine how often above target level See what remedies are effective Many EPA Regions & State agencies have set urgent response levels. If the levels are exceeded, you are tasked to take some corrective action within a few days! These are some of the options if urgent response is needed. Continuous monitoring enables one to determine which remedy can get the job done.

Remedy Effectiveness #2 20 Location BZD24 18 16 14 14 ug/m3 TCE BZD 24 (ug/m3) 12 10 8 24 vs 22 6 4 2 4 ug/m3 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 2/24/17 Run # 3/21/17 Seal Sumps TCE concentrations in a basement at an industrial facility. Values ranged from 4 ug/m3 to 14 ug/m over the 1 month sampling period. But when two floor sumps were sealed up, values crashed to zero within a couple of hours. The monitoring data documented within hours that this remedy was effective. 25

Large Industrial Facility - SD SVE Remedial Confirmation Pre-SVE Active-SVE 5 days The same San Diego facility shown previously prior to start-up of an SVE and after start-up of the SVE. Proof positive of system effectiveness. 26

Proving the Effectiveness of a Remedy TCE indoor air concentrations at 4 locations in an operating facility. Note instant drop in indoor air concentrations to levels that were protective when the mitigation system was started-up. This pattern was recognized within a few hours.

Remedy Evaluation - Home First 7 days Indoor Air Filtration Units Off TCE indoor air concentrations in the master bedroom over the first week. Values were about 2 ug/m3 and steady when indoor air filtration units and sub-slab depressurization were operative. But 2 ug/m3 is right at the allowed level for a residential exposure, so not low enough to ensure safety. After a few days, the filtration units were turned off and concentrations immediately increased with a daily wave-like pattern. What was going on? 28

9 8 Remedy Evaluation TCE (ug/m 3 ) Master -Bedroom Home vs. Run ~30 # Days Air Filtration Units Off On 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 SSD On SSD Off 0 0 48 96 144 192 240 288 336 9/12/16 9/24/16 10/16/16 TCE in the same master bedroom over 30 days. Air filtration units turned off after a few days, then the SSD turned off about a week later. Note that the mean TCE concentration while the air filtration units & SSD were operative was 1.9 ug/m3, then jumped to 4.2 ug/m3 when the air filtration units were turned off but the SSD was operating. Once the SSD was turned off, the mean concentration dropped to 2.6 ug/m3. The key point is that the SSD system operation resulted in higher mean and peak concentrations! The daily oscillation correlated perfectly with wind speed. None of this would have been recognized without high resolution monitoring data. 29

TCE Trailer 1 st Floor 40 Trailer 1st Floor 35 30 25 Filters On Filters Off 20 TCE 15 10 5 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 TCE indoor air concentrations in a residential trailer. Values ranged from 5 to 15 ug/m3 and showed a sinusoidal pattern. Two high volume air filtration units were turned on which resulted in an immediate drop in concentrdations down to about 5 ug/m3. 30

TCE Trailer Shroud 80 Crawl Space 70 60 50 Filters On 40 TCE 30 20 10 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 TCE indoor air concentrations in the shroud underneath the residential trailer. Values ranged from 5 to 30 ug/m3 and showed a sinusoidal pattern. Two high volume air filtration units were turned on in the trailer which had no effect on the shroud concentrations. 31

Expedited Remediation Remedies Remediation & Mitigation System Monitoring In-Situ GW/Soil Remediation Thermal Heating Sub-Slab Depressurization Systems 32 Vaporsafe can provide data from many locations around a site to demonstrate the effectiveness of remediation systems and building mitigation systems. 32

Remediation Monitoring Vinyl Chloride Effluent 80 70 Location EF 1 Vinyl Chloride 73 ug/m3 60 Vinyl chloride (ug/m3) 50 40 30 Energized 20 10 Before Energized 0 2/27/17 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 3/11/17 Run # 3/21/17 Vinyl Chloride in the effluent from a permanganate scrubber located immediately adjacent to a large thermal remediation project. The vinyl chloride concentrations started increasing almost immediately once the electrodes were energized. Vaporsafe data enabled rapid recognition of this situation and enabled the consultant to take immediate corrective action. 33

90 80 Remediation Monitoring TCE Indoors Location IA 1 TCE 80 ug/m3 70 TCE (ug/m3) 60 50 40 Energized 30 20 10 Before Energized 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Run # 2/27/17 3/11/17 3/21/17 TCE in a warehouse located immediately adjacent to a large thermal remediation project. The TCE concentrations started increasing almost immediately once the electrodes were energized. Vaporsafe data enabled rapid recognition of this situation and enabled the consultant to take immediate corrective action. 34

Summary High Resolution Data Allows Pattern Pattern = Opportunity Opportunity to: Indoor vs Subsurface Source VOC entry locations, preferential pathways Determine Best Remedy Quickly!! Effectiveness of mitigation systems Effectiveness of remediation systems Summary of lessons learned from monitoring projects since March 2016. Continuous high frequency monitoring can be implemented during many phases of a vapor intrusion project life-span: initial building evaluation, determining whether mitigation is required, optimizing the remedy and remedy confirmation. Pattern = Opportunity. None of this is possible if the pattern is not recognized.

500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 TCE 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 100 200 300 400 Blayne Hartman, Ph.D. blayne@hartmaneg.com Mark Kram, Ph.D. Cliff Frescura mark.kram@groundswelltech.com TCE