Land Use Analysis. Introduction. Methodology. Existing Land Use Analysis/Existing Noise Contours, 2004

Similar documents
4 EXISTING AND FORECAST NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS

CHAPTER 5 Noise Exposure Maps and Effects on Land Use

August 8, 2017 Community Engagement Panel Meeting #3 Alternatives Evaluation Process & Identification of Preferred Alternatives

Noise Compatibility Program Update

AND 2019 NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS WITH EXISTING NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM

The ATP that follows is recommended to be used for all phases of the FLL RSIP beginning June 1, The ATP describes the following:

C Meeting date: February 05, 2007

Agency Scoping. May 31, :00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Environmental Impact Statement Port Columbus International Airport

Federal Aviation Administration

NOISE ANALYSIS. C hapter INTRODUCTION

Sound Insulation of Residences and Other Buildings Exposed to Aircraft Noise

Chapter 6 Environmental Review

Airport Master Plan Update June 14, 2017

Eric Engstrom, Principal Planner; Steve Kountz, Senior Planner. Incorporating Airport Futures into Portland s 2035 Comprehensive Plan

Public Workshop #9. October 11, 2016

CONTENTS FIGURES TABLES

Memorandum Y~,Y: ACTION: Guidance Letter AlP AIP Eligibilityand. Environmental, APP-400. August17,2012

2004 Initiative Land Use Policy Coordination

Massachusetts Port Authority April 4, :00pm MEPA Scoping Meeting. Multi-Purpose Room 10 Mudge Way Bedford, MA 01730

Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND

SECTION 4 - NOISE INTRODUCTION

1.0 Determining Eligibility

Presenter Contact Information

TIER 2 EIS SCOPING MEETING WELCOME TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION SCOPING MEETING

Boston Overflight Noise Study. Phase 1 PROJECT CONSULTANT SCOPE OF SERVICES

The existing land use surrounding North Perry Airport can be described as follows:

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN II

Environmental Trends in Aviation to 2050

1.1 Purpose of the Climate Action Plan Update

3.3 NOISE Existing Setting Thresholds of Significance

268 South Main Street, South Amboy, NJ. HUD Noise Screening Analysis

Draft Environmental Assessment Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements

Section 3.9 Land Use and Planning ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

Environmental Affairs Seminar Noise Briefing. April 15, Dan Frazee, San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Mary Ellen Eagan, HMMH

No Plane, Big Gain: Airport Noise and Residential Property Values in the Reno-Sparks Area

11.0 NOISE ELEMENT NOISE ELEMENT THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON GENERAL PLAN 11-1

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Final Environmental Impact Report No. 617 John Wayne Airport Settlement Agreement Amendment

Raleigh Executive Jetport Master Plan Update SEPT 27, 2017

A comparison of the Northwest Corridor (NWC) Project Noise Analysis Completed under the 2005 GDOT Noise Policy versus the 2011 FHWA Noise Policy

October 19, 2017 Community Engagement Panel Meeting #4 Overview of Environmental Effects

Chapter 4: Forecasting Growth and Land Use CHARLOTTE COUNTY PUNTA GORDA MPO 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Cooperative Sustainability of the Military Training Mission

APPENDIX L IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX

3.1 Noise Overlay District

4.6 Noise Introduction Noise Descriptors

MOUNTAIN VISTA SUBAREA PLAN FORT COLLINS, COLORADO TRAFFIC NOISE EVALUATION REPORT

Addendum: Final Design Noise Analysis Report (Post-Meeting Supplemental Field Work and Analysis)

Reducing Built Environment Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Thurston County. Summary January 2016

Executive Summary. January 2015

Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures

A. INTRODUCTION B. NOISE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

Development Update: The FAA s Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT)

Colorado Spring Municipal Airport

Standard emission minimization measures for construction activities will be implemented, as indicated above.

Appendix G New Bus Facility Noise Assessment September 2014

4.10 LAND USE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

Appendix L: Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Aircraft Noise

CHAPTER 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES

Amador County General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report

DRAFT Part 1: ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR LAND USE PLANNING

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Volume 1. NBC Universal Evolution Plan ENV EIR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO Council District 4

Guidelines for the Preparation and Content of the Noise Element of the General Plan

Strategic noise mapping of Adelaide CBD

Planning. Local. 46 Planning

SECTION 5: ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT

Section 3 - Land Use, Population, and Water Demands. Section 3

Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: March 15, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: 9

SECTION B TABLES & FIGURES

Managing GHG Compliance Liabilities in Times of Regulatory Uncertainty

C O Y N E R ANCH S P E C I F I C P L A N C O U N T Y O F I M P E R I A L, CA

FORT HOOD JOINT LAND USE STUDY PROJECT UPDATE APRIL 20, 2016

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: December 21, 2006 AGENDA ITEM: 11

Environmental Impact Assessment

Aviation and Climate Change. Ted Thrasher ICAO Environment Branch UTIAS-MITACS International Workshop on. 27 May 2010

APPENDIX A PROJECT BUILDOUT ANALYSES

SUMMARY S.1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS TUCSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Greenhouse Gas. Guidance for FAA NEPA Documents. Thomas Cuddy. Office of Environment and Energy (AEE-400)

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

Draft Environmental Impact City of Daly City General Plan Update. Sacramento, California, May

Chapter 4: Transportation and Land Use

SBEADMR Priority Treatment Areas Process and Results

RESOLUTION NUMBER 5017

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

April 12, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting. Landfill Energy Systems

3.10 NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. Noise Characteristics

ROSEN GOLDBERG &DER Consultants in Acoustics

Wind Law - - To replace 17, Noise Standards and Setbacks for Wind Energy Conversion

CHAPTER 2 - TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DEVELOPMENT

2016 Environmental Benchmarking Survey

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

Port of San Diego Climate Mitigation and Adaption Plan

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

7.0 NOISE ELEMENT 7.1 INTRODUCTION

DIVERSIFIED RURAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE DIVERSIFIED RURAL ALL COMMUNITIES

Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts

Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (FAR) Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update

Chapter 4 Cumulative Effects

Transcription:

DETROIT METROPOLITAN WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT FAR PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE CHAPTER E LAND USE ANALYSIS

Analysis Introduction This section of the FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport summarizes the compatibility of various land uses with the existing (2004) and future (2011) base case noise exposure contours. One of the first steps in evaluating land use compatibility is to identify the existing and future noise exposure impacts associated with the operation of Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport. As the Part 150 Study begins to examine alternative noise abatement or land use compatibility actions, a direct comparison will be made with the information presented in this chapter to gauge the success of alternatives. Methodology The land use and population analysis for both the existing and future base case noise contours were derived from a variety of sources. The existing land use maps provided in the Inventory Chapter were used to determine the number of acres of different land use types. The noise contours were overlaid on these maps and a Geographical Information System (GIS) computer program was used to determine the number of acres of each land use type. Housing units and population numbers were determined from the 2000 Census (and most recent updates) using the same GIS program. The information was determined using the census block level data for each contour. In addition, specific parcel level maps provided by the Airport indicated the number of residential structures that have been sound attenuated. Existing Analysis/Existing Noise s, 2004 This section discusses the land use types found within the existing noise exposure contours generated by aircraft at. The existing noise exposure is represented by three (3) contour bands, the 65 DNL, 70 DNL, and 75 DNL contours. A Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study uses the 65 DNL contour as the threshold contour for land use analysis, based on the FAA s land use compatibility guidelines. The Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update E.1

FAR Part 150 Guidelines are presented in the Noise Methodology Chapter, Figure C10. The 65 DNL and greater contour 1 is the largest contour, containing approximately 9,475 acres. There are approximately 630 residential units representing approximately 1,400 people within the contour, contained on 420 acres of residential development. Of these, all but approximately 30 housing units or about 70 people are within the existing sound attenuation program boundaries. Table E1 summarizes the distribution of land uses within the noise contours. The greatest quantity of land within the 65 DNL and greater contour consists of open/agricultural lands and transportation/utilities uses (4,070 acres and 3,910 acres, respectively, for a total of 84% of the total area). There are no schools that have not been sound attenuated or churches within the 65 DNL noise contour. There are no historical sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places within the 65 DNL and greater contour. Table E1 also shows the composition of each band of contour to enable a comparison of land uses relative to the FAA s land use compatibility guidelines. Table E1 summarizes the land uses within each contour that occurred in 2004. Existing Incompatibilities The FAA, through FAR Part 150, has developed generalized guidelines for land use compatibility for land use planning purposes, as presented in the Noise Methodology Chapter, Figure C10. Within FAR Part 150, these land use compatibility guidelines are to be used unless the local communities have adopted local guidelines; in the case of the communities near, no aircraft noise specific land use guidelines have been adopted. Therefore, for purposes of this study, the FAA guidelines are used. Based on FAA guidelines, residential land uses within the 65 DNL or greater noise contours are not compatible with the aircraft noise exposure unless the residence has sound attenuation features that reduce interior noise to requisite levels. Without such attenuation, the property would be considered incompatible with the noise exposure. All of the homes within the existing 65 DNL and greater noise contours have been attenuated or have been offered sound attenuation. As noted earlier, no other noise non-insulated sensitive facilities were located within the 65 DNL or greater noise exposure contour for the existing base case. 1 The impact analysis presented in this chapter notes the impacts between the 65 DNL and 70 DNL noise contour (referred to as 65-70 DNL), impacts between the 70 DNL and 75 DNL noise contour (70-75 DNL), those within the 75 DNL and greater noise contour. The total impact within the 65 DNL noise includes these incremental contours. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update E.2

Table E1 EXISTING LAND USE WITHIN EXISTING NOISE CONTOURS, 2004 Detroit Wayne County Metropolitan Airport FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update 65-70 DNL 70-75 DNL 75 DNL 65 DNL and Greater % of Total People 1,360 40 0 1,400 Housing Units* 610 20 0 630 Churches 0 0 0 0 Schools 0 0 0 0 (acres) Residential 410 Ac 10 Ac 0 Ac 420 Ac 4.4% Transportation/Utilities 970 Ac 1,540 Ac 1,400 Ac 3,910Ac 41.3% Commercial 300 Ac 180 Ac 0 Ac 480 Ac 5.0% Industrial 445 Ac 55 Ac 0 Ac 500 Ac 5.3% Water 55 Ac 30 Ac 0 Ac 85 Ac 0.9% Institutional 10 Ac 0 Ac 0 Ac 10 Ac 0.1% Open/Agriculture 2,780 Ac 1,110 Ac 180 Ac 4,070 Ac 43.0% Total Acres 4,970 Ac 2,925 Ac 1,580 Ac 9,475 Ac 100% SOURCE: Aerial Photography and Base Map, SEMCOG. 2000 Census Data, BDC Analysis. The 65 and greater figures are cumulative. The contours contain the area within all smaller contours. Population and housing units rounded to nearest five. Percentages may not add due to rounding. * All homes within the 65 75 contour band have been sound attenuated, or offered sound attenuation, which are considered compatible for purposes of this Study. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update E.3

Existing Analysis/Future (Base Case, 2011) Noise s A review was conducted of the existing land uses that could be affected five years into the future. The Existing and Future Baseline Noise Conditions Chapter, page D.52, discusses the noise exposure contour prepared for the year 2011. This base case assumes that no operational or facility modifications would occur at the Airport, and is reflective of the forecast operations and aircraft types explained previously in the Forecast Chapter. This is the noise exposure contour map that all future alternative scenarios will be measured against to quantify land use effects as compared with what would occur if no mitigation measures were implemented. The future base case noise contours are slightly smaller than the existing noise contours as a result of continued noise reductions associated with the increase in quieter aircraft that are forecast to be operating in the future. The future contour is expected to decrease the impact from 9,470 acres within the 65 DNL noise contour to 8,700 acres in 2011 an 8.1% reduction. The 65 DNL and greater noise contour is expected to contain approximately 8,700 acres. Approximately 540 residential units with about 1,030 residents/people would be within the 65 DNL and greater noise contour, contained on approximately 330 acres of residential land. Similar to the existing conditions, the largest categories of land use that would be affected in 2011 consist of transportation/utilities and open space/agriculture land uses (3850 acres and 3,550 acres, respectively or about 85% of the total area within the 65 DNL and greater noise contour). Table E2 lists the various existing land uses that are expected to be within the 2001 base case noise contour. Future Base Case (2011) Incompatibilities As noted in Table E2, residential homes are the only noise sensitive land uses that are located in the 65 DNL and greater noise contour that have not been previously sound attenuated. The majority of homes within the 2011 base case contour have been sound attenuated and are considered compatible. The noise contour to be used to identify eligibility boundaries will be determined after an evaluation of operational and facility alternatives. All of the homes within the 65 DNL and greater noise contours have been attenuated or offered sound attenuation, and considered compatible for purposes of this Study. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update E.4

Table E2 EXISTING LAND USE WITHIN FUTURE BASE CASE NOISE CONTOURS, 2011 Detroit Wayne County Metropolitan Airport FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update 65-70 DNL 70-75 DNL 75 DNL 65 DNL and Greater % of Total People 990 40 0 1,030 Housing Units* 520 20 0 540 Churches 0 0 0 0 Schools 0 0 0 0 (acres) Residential 320 Ac 10 Ac 0 Ac 330 Ac 3.8% Transportation/Utilities 980 Ac 1,510 Ac 1,360 Ac 3,850 Ac 44.3% Commercial 310 Ac 150 Ac 0 Ac 460 Ac 5.3% Industrial 380 Ac 50 Ac 0 Ac 430 Ac 4.9% Water 40 Ac 30 Ac 0 Ac 70 Ac 0.8% Institutional 10 Ac 0 Ac 0 Ac 10 Ac 0.1% Open/Agriculture 2,430 Ac 940 Ac 180 Ac 3,550 Ac 40.8% Total Acres 4,470 Ac 2,690 Ac 1,540 Ac 8,700 Ac 100% SOURCE: Aerial Photography and Base Map, SEMCOG. 2000 Census Data, BDC Analysis. The 65 and greater figures are cumulative. The contours contain the area within all smaller contours. Population and housing units rounded to nearest five. Percentages may not add due to rounding. * All homes within the 65 70 contour band have been sound attenuated or offered sound attenuation, which are considered compatible for purposes of this Study. s Larger Than 65 DNL and Supplemental Metrics The 60 DNL contour, as well as the supplemental metrics are included as supplemental information in the following chapters for the sole purposes of identifying areas that may receive increased or decreases sound levels. The 60 DNL contours are generally less accurate than the higher intensity contours, but when comparing one noise abatement option to another, show the locations that could experience an increase or decrease in noise exposure. Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update E.5