BIOLOGY TAHOE.UCDAVIS.EDU

Similar documents
BIOLOGY TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

l ake Biology terc.ucdavis.edu

NUTRIENTS AND PARTICLES TAHOE.UCDAVIS.EDU 9

nutrients and particles terc.ucdavis.edu 9

NUTRIENTS AND PARTICLES TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

NUTRIENTS AND PARTICLES TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

clarity terc.ucdavis.edu 11

2012 Range Ponds Water Quality Report

Ecosystem Consulting Service, Inc. July 15, P a g e

Light and the Aquatic Ecosystem

White Lake 2017 Water Quality Report

2016 Summit Lake Water Quality Report Prepared by Thurston County Environmental Health Division

8 LITTLE CROSBY LAKE RESULTS

Water Quality Analysis of Lakewood Lakes

DRAFT. DRAFT July 9, 2013 Lake-Wide Survey (No. 8) Page 1 of Cayuga Lake. Lake-Wide Seabird Profiles

Analysis of Chlorophyll-a and other data collected in the Illinois River Watershed from

2018 Sebago Lake Assessment

Biological Oceanography

Lake Tahoe Water Quality Investigations

Interpreting Lake Data

Use of Algae to Determine Water Quality

Patterns of Productivity

Watersheds and Cayuga Lake, David Bouldin, Emeritus Professor Seminar for Crop and Soil Science August 28, 2014

The Who, Why, and What can be Done about Golden Brown Algae in Torch Lake

Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates P O Box 65; Turner, ME

Lake Tahoe Water Quality Investigations

Lake Tahoe Water Quality Investigations

Interpreting Lake Data

Gary Fahnenstiel RECENT CHANGES IN PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY AND PHYTOPLANKTON DYNAMICS

Arrow Lakes Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Program Measurements

Understanding Lake Data

Zu-Tao Ou-Yang Center for Global Change and Earth Observation Michigan State University

Laurel Lake water quality, nutrients, and algae, summer

Little Bay Water Quality Report Card Spring 2014

Production and Life OCEA 101

RECENT RESEARCH UPDATES TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU 6

Lake Washington. Water Quality Assessment Report. Copyright 2012 PLM Lake & Land Management Corp.

Water Quality Monitoring for Lake Erie and the Great Lakes Nutrient Initiative (GLNI)

Production vs Biomass

2017 Data Report for Ottawa Lake, Iron County

Patterns of Productivity

6/27/11. Aquatic Community Ecology (BIOL 312) Summer I. Ecological Principles. What is an ecological community? Ecological Principles

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

CHERRY CREEK RESERVOIR DESTRATIFICATION SYSTEM

Water Quality-Chlorophyll A Correlations Across Five Lakes

2017 Data Report for Fern Lake, Grand Traverse County

2017 Data Report for Rogers Pond, Mecosta County

SITES. Bull Shoals Lake. Seasonal Analysis

Chapter 5. Mono Basin Waterfowl Habitat and Population Monitoring

THS Sci-O Water Quality Tryout Test. Partner 1: Partner 2: Total Score: /104

2018 Data Report for Pickerel Lake, Kalkaska County

Okanagan Lake Collaborative Monitoring Agreement 2015 Summary Report June 2016

4/28/2013. Transmission of Light in Seawater. Color in the Ocean Color of ocean ranges from deep blue to yellow-green Factors Turbidity from runoff

Lake Tahoe Water Quality Investigations

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION. Lake Augusta Alum Treatment Lower Mississippi Watershed Management Org. COMMENT:

Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates P O Box 65; Turner, ME

CLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# CLMP+ Data Summary

Appendix A. General Concepts in Lake Water Quality. Black Dog WMO Watershed Management Plan P:\23\19\513\plan\Black Dog WMO adopted plan.

Modeling Fate and Effects of Multiple Stressors on a Use- Impaired River

2017 Data Report for Loon Lake, Iosco County

Long-term Water Quality Trend Analysis on Black Lake Thanks to Volunteer Monitoring Efforts

NASA Workshop for Remote Sensing of Coastal & Inland Waters

MAR 650-Lecture 1: Influences of Light on Biological Production. Importance: In the ocean: 1) Photosynthesis and Primary Production

2017 Data Report for Portage Lake, Washtenaw County

2017 Data Report for Little Paw Paw Lake, Berrien County

Lake Tahoe Water Quality Investigations

2015 Range Ponds Water Quality Report

2017 Data Report for Silver Lake, Van Buren County

Part I: Salish Sea Introduction. Review:

CLMP+ Report on Fleming Lake (Aitkin County)

Includes the coastal zone and the pelagic zone, the realm of the oceanographer. I. Ocean Circulation

COMPARISON OF NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECTS ON NEARSHORE PERIPHYTON IN LAKE CRESCENT, WASHINGTON STATE SIMEON FRANCIS REDBERG A THESIS

Portage Lake CASS COUNTY

Austin Lake Baseline Inversion Oxygenation Data 2017 Kalamazoo County, Michigan

Use of Vollenweider-OECD Modeling to Evaluate Aquatic Ecosystem Functioning

INDEX WORDS: Zooplankton, phytoplankton, Lake Erie, bivalves, grazing.

Understanding the Basics of Limnology

Section 5. Mono Basin Waterfowl Habitat and Population Monitoring

Lec 6: Primary Producers and Production

SUNLIGHT & OCEAN ZONATION

Life in Water. Chapter 3

After reviewing data collected from ISLAND POND, STODDARD, the program coordinators have made the following observations and recommendations.

Section 5. Mono Basin Waterfowl Habitat and Population Monitoring

U.S. Geological Survey s Update on the Water Quality of Delavan Lake

Cultural accelerated by anthropogenic activities

Lakes, Primary Production, Budgets and Cycling

Measuring Ocean Color: The Basics

Water Monitoring in Spa Creek: A Summary

Section 5. Mono Basin Waterfowl Habitat and Population Monitoring

Phosphorus Goal Setting Process Questions and Answers 2010

Physics, Chemistry, and Biology in Ponds and Lakes

Physics, Chemistry, and Biology in Ponds and Lakes

Nutrient Issues in Lake Ontario. Lisa Trevisan Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change

Lake Tahoe Water Quality Investigations

Dead Zones for Dinner

LAKE & RESERVOIR ASSESSMENTS WHITE OAK RIVER BASIN. Catfish Lake

Glossary. hefreediction ary.com/algae. hefreediction ary.com/anth

Lakes, Primary Production, Budgets and Cycling Schlesinger and Bernhardt (2013): Chapter 8, p

The relationship between physical characteristics and a specific algal community on the Moore Feature in Douglas Lake.

Ecosphere. Background Information on Organisms ALGAE BRINE SHRIMP BACTERIA

Transcription:

10

Algae growth (primary productivity) Yearly since 1959 Primary productivity is a measure of the rate at which algae produce biomass through photosynthesis. It was first measured at Lake Tahoe in 1959 and has been continuously measured since 1968. Supported by nutrient loading into the lake, changes in the underwater light environment, and a succession of algal species, the trend shows primary productivity has increased substantially over time. In 2017, there was an increase in primary productivity to 237.2 grams of carbon per square meter. 10.1

Algae abundance Yearly since 1984 Algae (phytoplankton) are the base of the Lake Tahoe food web, and essential for lake health and the well-being of the entire ecosystem. The amount or biomass of free-floating algae in the water is determined by extracting and measuring the concentration of chlorophyll-a, a photosynthetic pigment that allows plants to convert energy from the sun. Though the value varies annually, aside from an increase in the later 1980s the amount has generally stayed near-constant. The average annual concentration for 2017 was 0.67 micrograms per liter, higher than the previous year s value of 0.59 micrograms per liter. For the period of 1984-2017 the average annual chlorophyll-a concentration in Lake Tahoe was 0.70 micrograms per liter. 10.2

Chlorophyll-a distribution In 2017 The distribution of algae (measured as chlorophyll-a) is the result of a combination of light availability, nutrient availability, mixing processes, and to a lesser extent, water temperature. This figure shows color contours of chlorophyll-a concentration down to a depth of 350 feet. Below this depth chlorophyll-a concentrations are near zero due to the absence of light. Lake Tahoe has a deep chlorophyll maximum in the summer that occupies the range of 150-300 feet in the water column. In that depth range, the light and nutrient conditions are most favorable for algal growth. With the onset of thermal stratification in spring, the majority of the algae were confined to a discrete band. Throughout the summer and fall, concentrations decreased as nutrients were depleted. In December, the commencement of mixing again redistributed the algae over a broader depth range. Chlorophyll-a (μg L -1 ) 10.3

Annual distribution of algal groups Yearly since 1982 The amount of algal cells from different groups varies from year to year. Diatoms are the most common type of alga, comprising over one-third of the total abundance of algal cells in 2017. Bluegreen algae (19 percent), green algae (17 percent), and dinoflagellates (17 percent) were next most common in abundance. While the proportion of the major algal groups show a degree of consistency from year-to-year, TERC research has shown that the composition of individual species within the major groups is changing both seasonally and annually in response to lake conditions. Data were unavailable from 1990-1992. 10.4

Abundance of dominant diatom species Monthly in 2017 Diatoms have been the dominant algal group at Lake Tahoe for all but a few years since 1982. Diatoms are unique in that they are enclosed within a cell wall made of silica, called a frustule. Here the dominant diatom species at Lake Tahoe in 2017 are shown. Large variations are evident by month in the relative composition. Throughout the year, the dominant species varies from Cyclotella to Synedra to Nitzschia. Of note is the fact that Cyclotella, which has been responsible for clarity decreases in Lake Tahoe, was only a minor contributor to clarity reduction in the second half of 2017. Data were unavailable for April 2017. 10.5

Algal groups as a fraction of total biovolume Monthly in 2017 The biovolume of algal populations vary month to month, as well as year to year. In 2017, diatoms again dominated the biovolume of the phytoplankton community, especially in the summer. The peak in the biovolume (the spring bloom ) occurred a month earlier in May rather than June. The large influx of stream nutrients may have contributed to this early high point. Even at the peak of the bloom, algal cells occupied only one ten-millionth of the water in the lake. The peak biovolume in 2017 was 170 cubic millimeters per cubic meter. Data were unavailable for April 2017. 10.6

Predominance of Cyclotella gordonensis From 2002 through 2017 In 2008, one species of algae, Cyclotella gordonensis, started to dominate the make-up of algae at Lake Tahoe. The cells range in size from 4-30 microns in diameter. During the summer, the smallest cells, 4-5 microns, control the community in the upper euphotic zone. This size range, which is similar to inorganic particles, is ideal for light scattering. The growing numbers of Cyclotella between 2008-2011 were believed to be responsible for the major decline in summer clarity in those years. In 2017, the concentration of Cyclotella cells returned to their pre-2008 range, where they had little impact on the lake s clarity. The lower panel indicates the concentrations of Cyclotella at a depth of 16.5 feet (5 m). The black line in the upper panel indicates the individual Secchi depths taken since 2002. While 2017 clarity levels were very low, it is clear that Cyclotella was not a major factor. 10.7

Distribution of Cyclotella gordonensis In 2016 and 2017 In 2017, Cyclotella gordonensis was found in Lake Tahoe in low numbers especially when compared to 2016. These numbers were so low that the data are barely visible in the color contour plot. The color contours of the number of cells per milliliter are shown along with the individual Secchi depth measurements. In 2017, lake clarity was consistently low from May through the end of the year. As described in other sections of the report, the main contributor to low clarity was the exceptionally large influx of fine, inorganic particles. 10.8

Peak shoreline algae concentrations Yearly since 2000 Periphyton, or attached algae, makes rocks around the shoreline of Lake Tahoe green and slimy, or sometimes like a very plush, white carpet. Periphyton is measured five to eight times each year, and this graph shows the maximum biomass measured at four sites for the period from January to June. In 2017, concentrations at the four sites shown were again close to their historic lows. The two most urbanized sites, Tahoe City and Pineland, were less than half of their values in comparison with the period 2011-2013. Part of the reason for the low values in 2017 was the rapidly rising lake level during spring. These data were from a depth of 1.5 feet below the water surface on substrate that had been above water for two years. While monitoring periphyton is an important indicator of nearshore health, these data do not shed information on what is controlling yearto-year changes. 10.9

Shoreline algae distribution In 2017 Periphyton biomass was surveyed around the lake during the spring of 2017, the time of the annual maximum. Nearly 45 locations were inspected by snorkel and scuba survey at depths of 1.6 feet (0.5 m) and 3.3 feet (1.0 m). A Periphyton Biomass Index (PBI), defined as the fraction of the local bottom area covered by periphyton multiplied by the average length of the algal filaments, is assessed at each location. During spring 2017, water level rose rapidly and submerged substrate at 1.6 feet which had been out of the water for several years and therefore supported little periphyton growth. By contrast, the PBI was much higher at a 3.3 feet depth, with many sites having a PBI > 1.5. This variation in lake level and the impact of prior conditions are part of what makes quantifying periphyton growth so challenging. Note: The width of the colored band does not represent the actual dimension of the onshore-offshore distribution. Similarly, its length does not represent the precise longitudinal extent. Distribution of Periphyton Biomass at 1.6 feet Depth, Spring 2017 Distribution of Periphyton Biomass at 3.3 feet Depth, Spring 2017 10.10