Monell Unit CO 2 Flood

Similar documents
Experiences in the Salt Creek Field CO2 Flood

Monell CO 2 EOR Unit. Grant Caldwell. December 6 th, Presented at the Annual CO 2 & ROZ Conference, Midland, Texas; Dec 6, 2018

COPYRIGHT. Development of a Gas Condensate Reservoir. The Anschutz Ranch East Field: Case Study

Update of Lost Soldier/Wertz Floods Living in a Constrained CO 2 Environment

Effects of Enhanced Oil Recovery on Production Engineers, Elm Coulee Field, Bakken Reservoir, Richland County, Montana

Rejuvenating A Mature EOR Asset: Miscible CO 2 Flooding at SACROC. Mark Linroth Kinder Morgan CO 2 Company, LP December 7 th, 2012

Timber Creek Field Study for Improving Waterflooding

SACROC CO 2 Flood Project Challenges: Past, Present, and Future

January 8, 2010 SUBJECT. Middle Bakken Formation / Three Forks Formation. Daly Bakken Three Forks Pool (01 62B) Daly Field, Manitoba

Proposed East Manson Unit No. 5 Application for Enhanced Oil Recovery Waterflood Project Middle Bakken East Manson, Manitoba

SOUTH CASPER CREEK: Steamflood Pilot Implementation

Carbon Dioxide White Paper Prepared for the Wyoming Joint Minerals, Business and Economic Development Interim Committee October 4, 2006

Bakken Shale: Evolution of a Giant Oil Field

ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY PLANNING FOR THE LUCKEY DITCH FIELD

Moving from Secondary to Tertiary Recovery Stages. 9 TH ANNUAL WYOMING EORCO2 CONFERENCE JULY 14-16, 2015 Casper, WY By Jim Mack MTech Ventures LLC

CESSFORD, ALBERTA ASSET DISPOSITION CESSFORD, ALBERTA

DEEPA TM Stimulation of Natural Fracture Networks in Austin Chalk

Feasibility of CO 2 Flooding Higher Viscosity Oils, Field Results, and Screening. Presented by: Richard Baker, December 7, 2012

Field Demonstration of CO 2 Miscible Flooding in the Lansing-Kansas City Formation, Central Kansas

Applicability of Gravity-Stable CO2 Injection in Mature Tensleep Reservoirs with Large TZ/ROZs

Turning around the Tern

Modeling and Monitoring Associated CO 2 Storage at the Bell Creek Field

CO 2 EOR - What s Working, What s Under Evaluation An Existing Technology Overview

Pryme Energy Limited ASX Code: PYM Turner Bayou Project Update and Investor Presentation

Reservoir Modeling and Simulation of the Devonian Gas Shale of Eastern Kentucky for Enhanced Gas Recovery and CO 2 Storage

Scotia Capital Tight Oil Waterflood Conference

INJECTION CONFORMANCE IN CO 2 FLOODS

Hearing How An Operator Monitored Individual Producing Well Pump Intake Pressures To Maximize The Areal Sweet In A CO2 Flooding Operation In The

Optimal Tertiary Recovery Strategies for Mature Wells. More Oil, Naturally. Daan Veeningen

AADE Symposium 2011 Haynesville Shale. Presented by James R. Redfearn Vice President Drilling & Completions Mid Continent Region January 19, 2011

MAXIMIZING OIL RECOVERY EFFICIENCY AND SEQUESTRATION OF CO 2 WITH GAME CHANGER CO 2 -EOR TECHNOLOGY

EORI 6 th Annual CO 2 Conference. Improving Conformance in CO 2 Floods with Polymer Gel Treatments. Michael Lantz TIORCO

The Potential For Secondary Recovery Projects in Wyoming

New Acid Stimulation Treatment to Sustain Production Los Angeles Downtown Oil Field U.S. Department of Energy Grant No.

Reservoir Evaluation and Simulation of CO2 Miscible Enhanced Oil Recovery on the South Willson Ranch Field

Delay P&A Through Improvement in Oil Cut for Mature Offshore Facilities

8 th Annual Wyoming CO 2 Conference

CONTENTS. Goal Zero Safety Culture...2. Unlock Your Reservoir...4

Air injection & displacement for recovery with oil horizontal (AIDROH) project Approval #11618 Performance presentation

pinedale Energy Long Life, Low Risk, U.S. Rockies Natural Gas November 2017

Wyoming CO 2 Status and Developments. Glen Murrell

Greenfields Petroleum Corporation

TSX-V: TBD USA - OTC: TBDYF

EOG_South Texas Eagle Ford-1

DJ Basin. Dan Kelly Vice President Wattenberg

For personal use only

CO2 EOR, Reservoir Sweep and CO2 Storage

Representing EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Waterflood Monitoring and Management. On-Line Monitoring. Waterflood Monitoring and Management. Waterflood Systems

Fueling our Future. Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute CO 2 Conference. Casper, July 2011

Navigating through the Challenges of NSPS OOOOa

Thermal Recovery Status and Development Prospect for Heavy Oil in China

2010 University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center.

Analyze EOR Potential of a Mature Oil Reservoir Using CO 2

The Effect of Different Carbon Dioxide Injection Modes on Oil Recovery

For contact information, please visit our website:

CO 2 TRANSPORTATION AND EOR The Genesis of the Carbon Highway

Latest Developments to Examine the Use of CO 2 and Ethane for EOR in the Bakken and Williston Basin Conventional Reservoirs

Oxy CO 2 EOR Project Discussion Draft MRV Plan

BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY

RDS Aberdeen. Thursday, May-05-11

Appearances Representing Philip Whitworth Stroud Petroleum, Inc. Scott D. Stroud EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Interwell Tracer Tests: Understanding Inter-Well Connectivity Within Your Reservoir

A Global Perspective for IOR and Primary in Unconventional Tight Oil and Gas Reservoirs. Richard Baker May-13

60%+ CO 2 -EOR TECHNOLOGY

EnerCom's London Oil & Gas Conference 16 June 2011 London, England Danny D. Simmons

ACTS: Anadarko Completion Transport System. Jeff Dufresne Completions Manager, Greater Natural Buttes

STACK. Next Step in Completion Evolution: Improves Performance. Longfellow Energy s Nemaha Project

Development Technologies for Oil Deposits below the Gas Cap in Lamadian of Daqing SEPTEMBER 26, 2017, ST. PETERSBURG, HOTEL ASTORIA

Production Engineering ALI NOORULDEEN

EOR Field Experiences in Carbonate Reservoirs in the United States

VALUE RICH SMALL CAP FINANCIAL EXPO. MIAMI, FLORIDA

Enabling Unconventional Resources

Detailed Reservoir Modeling and Simulation YES. Delay... Business-As-Usual or Different EOR Technology. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi)

New Methods and Technologies in Petroleum Geology, Drilling and reservoir Engineering. June Krynica, Poland

Managing a CO 2 Development in a Privately Funded Environment: The GLSAU Project

Historic IOR/EOR practices in the Minnelusa

THE APPLICATION OF FORGE ENERGY, LLC, INC. TO AMEND FIELD RULES FOR THE SHAFTER LAKE, N. (SAN ANDRES) FIELD, ANDREWS COUNTY, TEXAS

TSX-V: YO. September. Duvernay Shale Peters & Co. Energy Conference

CO 2 Geological storage - TOTAL Approach. SCA 2003 Symposium 14/12/2003

EVALUATE HORIZONTAL WELL PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE IN HEAVY OIL RESERVOIRS

Implementing Surveillance Tools and Processes to Improve Performance and Identify Possible Opportunities in Mature CO 2 Floods

Outline. Senate Bill 4 Overview

A CO 2 Midstream Overview

CO 2 -Enhanced Oil Recovery, Applying a Mature Technology in Kentucky

JAPAN CANADA OIL SANDS LTD. HANGINGSTONE DEMO PROJECT 2004 Presented on Monday, March 7, 2005 Presentation Outline

Practical Workflows for Reservoir Management and Production Enhancement in Fields under Waterflooding


Role of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbon Sequestration The Weyburn Monitoring Project, a case study

Forward Looking Statements

Connectivity Analysis; Understanding Waterflood Behavior, Connectivity for EOR Analysis. Richard Baker September-2012 Jackson Hole Wyoming

INJECTION OF NATURAL GAS INTO RESERVOIRS: A FEASIBLE SOLUTION TO GAS FLARING IN NIGERIA

COMPARISON FOR OIL RECOVERY BETWEEN WATER AND POLYMER FLOODING IN THE U-THONG OIL FIELD

WITH NEXT GENERATION CO 2 -EOR TECHNOLOGY. Session 19 SPE Special Session. Prepared for: 2 nd Petrobras International Seminar on CO 2

Utica Point Pleasant Play - Range s View on a Key Appalachian Basin Unconventional Target & Plans for Future Development

Influence of Clay Content on Surfactant- Polymer Flooding For an Egyptian Oil Field. Prof. Atef Abdelhady, British University in Egypt

Production Performance Optimisation

This is Reservoir Engineering COPYRIGHT. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Property Divestiture Lloydminster, AB; Silverdale, SK 210 bbl/d Heavy Oil Production

EXHIBIT 2 OPERATIONS OVERVIEW

Transcription:

Monell Unit CO 2 Flood Patrick Draw Field Sweetwater County, Wyoming May 29 th, 2008 Prepared by: Jason Gaines Senior Reservoir Engineer

APC Forward Looking Statement This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Anadarko believes that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions. No assurance, however, can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the projections, anticipated results or other expectations expressed in this presentation. Anadarko cannot guarantee that it will successfully execute on its exploration, drilling and a development plans. See Risk Factors in the company s s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K K and other public filings and press releases. Anadarko undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Anadarko s Wyoming EOR Assets Fields Monell Salt Creek Sussex Land Grant Gas Fields Oil Fields Third Party CO 2 Pipeline APC CO 2 Pipeline Sussex Pipelines 33 mile, 8 125 mile, 16 16 Salt Creek CO 2 Supply XOM Shute Creek 8 Monell

Monell Overview General Facts & History Discovered in 1959 ~115 MMBOOIP (prod 40 MMBO) 2001: Initiated pilot 2003: 33 mile PL & 1 st CO 2 injection 2006: Ph2 start-up 2007: NGL plant commissioned 2008: 9-spot drlg program ( 9 wells ) 2009: Ph3 development 28 27 33 34 4 3 Active WS 26 25 35 36 Future 2 1 WS 30 31 6 Planned sequestration of 85 Bcf CO 2 Current Status 3,000 BOPD 48 MMCFD CO 2 injection 39 CO 2 injectors CO 2 -EOR cumulative of 3 MMBO 9 16 10 11 12 WS Ph3 14 15 13 7 18 0 2,963 FEET

Upper Cretacous Stratigraphy Lance Formation Fox Hills Sandstone Upper Cretaceous Lewis Shale Almond Formation Ericson Sandstone Rock Springs Fm Blair Fm Mesaverde Group

West-East Cross Section Patrick Draw Field Table Rock ft 2000 Normal Fault Lance Lewis Almond Fort Union Wasatch 0 1 2 mi Sea Level

Monell Unit Upper Almond Reservoir Monell Unit Type Log MONELL UNIT 49 SN 0 100 ILD MNOR 0 100 0 40 SPNORM CILD MINV -90 10 500 0 0 40 Lewis Shale UA-5A Pay 4500 UA-5B Pay Lower Almond 4550

Reservoir Highlights Cretaceous Mesaverde Almond SS stratigraphic trap Barrier island/tidal channel inlet/shoreface depositional system Very fine to fine-grained lithic, illitic, kaolinitic, and quartzose sandstones 20% Porosity, 30md Permeability, 40% S wi 5 deg. dip, 25 Net Pay, 5,000 Acres at 4,500 depth Fractures and faulting are minor Oil zone confined up-dip by the depleted low pressure gas cap and down-dip by permeability pinchout ~115 MMSTB OOIP, 500 GOR, 43 deg. API sweet 20% Primary RF, 14% Waterflood RF 1,800 psi original reservoir pressure at 120 deg.f CO 2 Miscible with Oil (1450# MMP)

Monell Unit Phase Development Phase 1 Phase 2

Development Highlights Phase 1 implemented adding first 28 patterns of development Water curtain concept proven up as affective pressure barrier Horizontal 1: MU 43-27H - 5,000 lateral water injection well Horizontal 2: MU 44-27H - 6,800 lateral water injection well Four vertical water injection wells to the north Flood response seen within 3 months of initial injection Phase 2 implementation added 12 patterns of development Applied lessons learned from Phase 1 to Phase 2 Drilling, Completions, Facilities NGL plant installed and processing recycled CO 2 to recover NGL s Monitor/idle wellbores converted to producers to test 9-spot concept Drilling campaign under way to test 9-spot pattern performance Future phase development planning currently under way

Operations Highlights Drilling Currently drilling with coiled tubing drill rig Completions 50/50 lease crude and diesel frac fluid Wellbores Injectors: 5-1/2 casing; 2-3/8 IC tubing; Ni coated packer; inconell tubing hanger Producers: Pumping: 5-1/2 csg; 2-7/8 CS tubing; continuous sucker rod; 456 PU Flowing: 5-1/2 csg; 2-3/8 IC tubing; Ni coated packer; inconell tubing hanger; H20 slip-stream line at wellhead Flowlines Injection/Production: Continuous HDPE Headers Latest design (A2) includes central injection/production manifolds in common facility

Operations Highlights

Operations Highlights

Operations Highlights

Operations Highlights

Operations Highlights

Operations Highlights

Operations Highlights

Operations Highlights

Monell Unit Performance

PATRICK DRAW FIELD, MONELL UNIT CO2 FLOOD PROJECT PERFORMANCE 100000 10000 1000 100 10 1 Sep-59 Sep-61 Sep-63 Sep-65 Sep-67 Sep-69 Sep-71 Sep-73 Sep-75 Sep-77 Sep-79 Sep-81 Sep-83 Sep-85 Sep-87 Sep-89 Sep-91 Sep-93 Sep-95 Sep-97 Sep-99 Sep-01 Sep-03 Sep-05 Sep-07 Sep-09 Sep-11 Sep-13 Sep-15 BPD, MCFD Sep-17 Monell Unit Production History Primary Secondary Tertiary CO2 Flood Oil Gas CO2 Inj

Monell Unit Performance 100,000 48 MMcfdi 10,000 Pilot 2001-02 1 st CO 2 Inj Sept.03 3,000 bopd BPD, MCFD 1,000 100 Oil Production History 10 CO2 Inj History 1 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09

Monell Unit 9-Spot Type Well 250 Monell 9-Spot Review Oil Production BOPD 200 150 100 50 #6Well #7 Well #14 Well #17 Well #18 Well #121Well #157Well Type Well 0 1 135 269 403 537 671 805 939 1073 1207 1341 1475 1609 1743 Normalized Time (days)

Monell Unit 9-Spot Drilling - 2008

Monell Unit Future Development 28 27 26 Ph1 25 30 33 34 Active 35 36 31 4 Ph2 3 WS 2 Future 1 6 WS 9 10 11 12 WS Ph3 7 16 15 14 13 18 0 2,963 FEET

Monell Unit Applied Tools Field/Pattern surveillance (OFM) Dimensionless curves developed to help forecast performance Allows pattern comparison and balancing Will help identify problem patterns Bottom Hole Pressure Tool Surface Injection Pressure Calculates BHIP from SIP using phase envelope P & T segments Assures that we remain below fracture pressure at all times CO 2 Injection Schedule Developed to aid in balancing patterns and CO 2 utilization Automated system that can be controlled by volume and/or pressure Production Allocation Tool Ensure that production is allocated correctly from well test data Reservoir Simulation History Matching

Monell Unit Applied Tools Recovery Factor RF_for_PI_II PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_11-35 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_13-25 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_13-35 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_15-25 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_22-2 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_22-25 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_22-26 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_22-3 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_22-35 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_22-36 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_24-25 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_24-26 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_24-3 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_24-35 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_31-3 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_31-35 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_33-25 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_33-26 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_33-3 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_33-34 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_33-35 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_35-25 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_35-3 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_35-35 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_42-25 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_42-26 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_42-3 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_42-34 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_42-35 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_44-25 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_44-26 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_44-3 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_44-34 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_44-35 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_51-3 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_53-25 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_53-27 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_53-3 PATTERN: Phase 1&2 Patt_53-35 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 10-1 10-2 10-3 Anadarko Petroleum Company PATTERN: Patt_24-26 Patt_24-26 Daily Oil Rate ( bbl/d ) Daily Gas Rate ( Mcf/d ) Daily Water Rate ( bbl/d ) Daily CO2 Volume ( Mcf ) PDB Daily Prd CO2 Volume ( Mcf/d ) RatioGORCO2d ( Mcf/bbl ) HCPVinj 10-4 2003 04 05 06 07 08 Date

Monell Unit Applied Tools 10000 5000 Anadarko Petroleum Corporation MONELL UN 31-35 Well Name: Monell Unit 31-35 Well Depth SIP SIT 4,597 750 75 Tgrad 0.00 F/ft Monell Unit 31-35 1000 500 100 50 Depth Temp Davg Depth Pressure Bottom Hole Pressure 0 75 0 0 750 460 Monell Unit 31-35 75 229.85 460 780 919 75 689.55 919 813 1379 75 1149.25 1,379 850 1839 75 1608.95 1,839 950 2299 75 2068.65 2,299 1,102 2758 75 2528.35 2,758 1,262 3218 75 2988.05 3,218 1,425 3678 75 3447.75 3,678 1,593 4137 75 3907.45 4,137 1,763 4597 75 4367.15 4,597 1,933 5057 4826.85 0.42 psi/ft 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Well Name: Monell Unit 31-35 Monell Unit 31-35 3,500 Well Depth 10 SIP SIT 4,597 1,698 75 Tgrad 5 0.00 F/ft 4,000 4,500 1,933 Rate 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 Depth Temp Davg Depth Pressure Bottom Hole Pressure 0 75 0 0 1,698 460 Monell Unit 31-35 75 229.85 460 1,870 919 75 689.55 919 2,044 1379 75 1149.25 1,379 2,220 1839 1 75 1608.95 1,839 2,399 2299 75 2068.65 2,299 2,579 2758 75 2528.35 2,758 2,761 0.5 3218 75 2988.05 3,218 2,945 3678 75 3447.75 3,678 3,130 4137 75 3907.45 4,137 3,316 4597 75 4367.15 4,597 3,503 5057 4826.85 0.76 psi/ft 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 0 0.1 MONELL UN 31-35 Daily Inj Water Volume ( bbl ) Daily CO2 Volume ( Mcf ) 2003 04 Rate 05 1,749 mcfd 06 07 08 3,503 Date Date Stamp 02.04.08 5,000 Date Stamp

Monell Unit CO2 In Action PATRICK DRAW FIELD, MONELL UNIT CO2 FLOOD PROJECT PERFORMANCE 100000 10000 1000 100 10 1 Sep-59 Sep-61 Sep-63 Sep-65 Sep-67 Sep-69 Sep-71 Sep-73 Sep-75 Sep-77 Sep-79 Sep-81 Sep-83 Sep-85 Sep-87 Sep-89 Sep-91 Sep-93 Sep-95 Sep-97 Sep-99 Sep-01 Sep-03 Sep-05 Sep-07 Sep-09 Sep-11 Sep-13 Sep-15 BPD, MCFD Sep-17 Primary Secondary Tertiary CO2 Flood Oil Gas CO2 Inj

Salt Creek Overview General Facts & History Discovered in late 1800 s ~1.7 Bbbl OOIP (0.7 Bbbl cum prod) 9 productive intervals & 4,400 total wells 2003: Completed pilot, Ph1 & 125 mile PL 2004: 1 st CO 2 injection 2005: Ph2 start-up 2007: Ph3-4 start-up 2008: 2Q Ph5 start-up Flowing producers identical inj/prod set-up Planned sequestration of 660 Bcf CO 2 Current Status 7,000 BOPD from CO 2 ( 8,500 BOPD total ) 320 MMCFD CO 2 injection 153 CO 2 WAG injectors ( 20-acre 5-spots ) CO 2 -EOR cumulative of 5.5 MMBO 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 14 22 23 24 30 26 25 27 34 3 12 10 11 13 15 14 SALT CREEK SOUTH UNIT 23 24 22 2 Ph1-2 Future Development 18 17 16 13 Ph3-4 Town of Midwest 1 6 SALT CREEK LIGHT OIL UNIT 19 Ph5 20 21 28 29 32 33 31 36 35 Ph6 Ph7 5 4 9 7 8 17 16 18 20 21 19 Scale = 1 mile 27 26 25 30 29 28

Phase 1-4 CO 2 Flood Performance Salt Creek Phases 1-4 CO2 Flood Performance 9,000 8,000 Oil Production CO2 Injection 360 320 Gross Oil Production (BOPD) 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 280 240 200 160 120 Total CO2 Injection (MMCFD) 2,000 80 1,000 40 0 0 Jan-04 Jul-04 Jan-05 Jul-05 Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08

Anadarko s Rockies EOR Current Activity Monell Unit 3,000 BOPD 50% Developed (based on area) Improved sweep via 9-spot pilot Five years of continuous injection without major breakthrough Salt Creek 7,000 BOPD 20% Developed (based on area) Unique CO2 flood pushing technological envelope Phase development allows flexibility to apply lessons learned Future Development 1) Significant undeveloped resources at Monell and Salt Creek 2) Linch Fields ~ 15 miles north of Salt Creek 3) Apply lessons learned to future developments

Discussion?