Upgrade of the Marathon Louisiana Refining Division s Wastewater Treatment Plant to a State-of-the-Art Nitrification-Denitrification Facility

Similar documents
Global Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment

Upgrading Lagoons to Remove Ammonia, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus *nutrient removal in cold-climate lagoon systems

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

Tales from the Field: Troubleshooting Denitrification

ADVENT INTEGRAL SYSTEM

Emerging Issues in the Water/Wastewater Industry. Austin s Full-Scale Step-BNR Demonstration

BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS

UPGRADING FOR TOTAL NITROGEN REMOVAL WITH A POROUS MEDIA IFAS SYSTEM

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

Secondary Treatment Process Control

Feel free to contact me should you require any additional information regarding the report. I can be reached at

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

CORPORATION THE EXPERIENCED LEADER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

CORPORATION THE EXPERIENCED LEADER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

EVALUATION OF A WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY USING A ROTATING LOW-ENERGY NON-BLOWER AERATOR

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

COMBI-TREAT IMPROVED SBR TECHNOLOGY. 2.1Process Diagram:

Waste water treatment

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

2015 Spring Conference

ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX

Andrea Nifong, World Water Works (formerly HRSD) Stephanie Klaus, VT & HRSD

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

Assuming 100 gallons per capita per day, and 3 people per REU, design flows for the development are proposed to be:

Biological Nutrient Removal Operations. December 9 th, 2015 Presenter Georgine Grissop PE, BCEE

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

DISCUSSION PAPER. 1 Objective. 2 Design Flows and Loads. Capital Regional District Core Area Wastewater Management Program

WWTP Side Stream Treatment of Nutrients Considerations for City of Raleigh s Bioenergy Recovery Project. Erika L. Bailey, PE, City of Raleigh

Presentation Outline

CLR Process. Vertical Loop Configuration

FURTHER EXPANDED FLOWS AND LOADS R3 INDUSTRIAL WWTP PROCESS ENGINEERING EVALUATION

MBBR Technology: - A cost effective solution for upgrading existing Waste water Treatment Works. Bruno Bigot

ONSITE TREATMENT. Amphidrome

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

COLD WEATHER NITRIFICATION OF LAGOON EFFLUENT USING A MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) TREATMENT PROCESS

SECTION 8.0 NEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

Refinery Wastewater Process Modeling with GPS-X

UPGRADING WEST WODONGA BNR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. Peter Tolsher. Peter Tolsher, Supervisor Operator. North East Region Water Authority

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Upgrade of an Oxidation Ditch Using Bio-Mass Carriers

American Water College 2010

DESIGNING LAGOON-BASED WWTP FOR <1 MG/ L AMMONIA (AND TN) IN <34 F WATER. Nick Janous Regional Manager

LEMNA BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESS LEMTEC TM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NC-PC Industry Day Pretreatment 101. Industrial Waste Impacts on POTW Treatment Processes. Dawn Padgett Operations Manager Charlotte Water

- 1 - Retrofitting IFAS Systems In Existing Activated Sludge Plants. by Glenn Thesing

Chapter 11. Secondary Clarifiers

State-of-the-art Treatment Technology for Challenging Wastewaters Generated from Processing Opportunity Crudes

Design, Construction and Startup of the First Enhanced Nutrient Removal Plant in Maryland Funded by the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

INFRASTRUCTURE & OPERATION

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

Innovative Use of Dissolved Air Flotation with Biosorption as Primary Treatment to Approach Energy Neutrality in WWTPs

Attachment N o F Control & Monitoring

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Enhancing activated sludge nitrification through seeding from a downstream nitrifying fixed-film reactor

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impacts. A summary of the impacts of this treatment alternative are listed below:

The Development of Operational Tools for City-Wide Implementation of BNR in New York City. Sarah Galst, P.E. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.

Traditional Treatment

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

PILOT SCALE TESTS OF A UNIQUE APPROACH FOR BNR UPGRADE OF A SHORT SRT HIGH PURITY OXYGEN SYSTEM AT PIMA COUNTY, AZ

Energy Savings Through Denitrification

Wet Weather and Advanced Treatment: Procurement Strategies to Secure the Right Technology

WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Full Scale Testing to Demonstrate Anaerobic Selector Effect for Low Strength Wastewater

Wastewater Treatment. Where does wastewater go when it leaves your house?

Activated Sludge Process Control:

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

SBR FOR LOW FLOW APPLICATIONS

Planning for the Future Battle Creek s Approach to Upgrading its Secondary Treatment Processes

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Ballasted Activated Sludge Demonstration Study SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

General Information on Nitrogen

THE DEMON ANAMMOX PROCESS: RESOURCE SAVINGS THROUGH SIDE STREAM TREATMENT, AND THE STEPS TOWARDS AN ENERGY NEUTRAL WWTP PRESENTED AT: NC AWWA-WEA 97

Cold Weather Ammonia Removal

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Renovation of secondary treatment facility into the Step-feed Biological Nitrogen Removal Process by the effective use of the existing structure

Membrane Bioreactor and High Flow Biological Treatment System for the Cox Creek WRF

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Technical Memorandum No. 1

Dr Martin Peter *, Joachim Scholz & Victor Ferre. Contents

THE SEQUENCED AERATION PROCESS MONTAGUE, MASSACHUSETTS

Case Study. Biological Help for the Human Race. Industrial Wastewater Treatment at Eastern Seaboard Industrial Estate, Thailand.

Wastewater treatment objecives

Waste Water Treatment Plant Overview and Tour

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

AMMONIA REMOVAL USING MLE PROCESS EXPERIENCES AT BALLARAT NORTH. David Reyne. Central Highlands Water Authority

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

Making Your Plant Denitrify

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

An Efficient Aeration Strategy Sits on a Three-Legged Stool

Transcription:

Upgrade of the Marathon Louisiana Refining Division s Wastewater Treatment Plant to a State-of-the-Art Nitrification-Denitrification Facility Presented to Air & Waste Management Association Louisiana Section November 19, 2008 by Carl E. Adams, Jr., PhD, P.E. ENVIRON International Corporation

Presentation Outline Background and Pre-Upgrade Facilities Upgrade Design and Implementation Performance Recent Developments e e

Background and Pre-Upgrade Facilities Refinery and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) began operation in 1976 Originally two treatment trains Third activated sludge train added in 1983 Conventional systems with External Secondary Clarifiers Past and planned expansions raised concern for capacity of existing WWTP and desire for cost-effective application of state- of-the-art technology Regulatory concern regarding potential future nitrogen discharge limits 250,000 bbls/day rated crude capacity in 2000

Background and Pre-Upgrade Facilities ENVIRON retained by Marathon in 2000 to review WWTP operations and assist in developing a wastewater Master Plan, including planning for VOC emissions and sludge residues 2001 Flows and Loads 2,100 gpm design average dry-weather flow 700 mg/l design average COD (17,900 lbs/day) 40 mg/l design average TKN (1,025 lbs/day) Projected Flows and Loads 2,310 gpm design average flow 21,640 lbs/day COD 1,250 lbs/day TKN

Background and Pre-Upgrade Facilities Pre-Upgrade Wastewater Facilities API Equalization Stormwater diversion Dissolved air flotation ti (DAF) Two treatment trains Cooling Tower Conventional Activated Sludge, i.e., external clarifier Three treatment trains (East / Middle / West) Effluent (Firewater) Pond Sludge Handling (aerobic digestion, centrifugation)

Background and Pre-upgrade Facilities AERATION TANKS SECONDARY CLARIFIERS EAST DAF WET WELL HOT WATER BYPASS RAS FLOC DAF COOLING TOWER C.T. WET WELL MIDDLE FIRE POND TANK DAF NORMAL BYPASS RAS WEST RAS CAT SETTLING POND TK 100-2 SERVES AS MAIN ONLINE EQ TANK DISCHARGES TO BIOPLANT CHARGE PUMP TK 100-3 SERVES TK AS 103 ONLINE DIVERSION/EQ 100,000 bbl TANK Floating Roof DISCHARGES TO TK 102 SUPERNATENT AEROBIC DIGESTER INFLUENT API API GRAVITY ONLY POLYMER REFINERY WASTEWATER CENTRATE TK 25-1 STORMWATER DIVERSION TK 100-4 STORMWATER DVIERSION DISCHARGES BACK TO API TK 100-5 PINNACLE RUNDOWN TANK (POLYMER REFINERY) DISCHARGES TO API BIOSLUDGE DISPOSAL TO THERMAL DESORBER

Background and Pre-Upgrade Facilities Pre-Upgrade Performance Hydraulic capacity Limited to 2,700 gpm maximum throughput Projected future max flow of up to 3,500 gpm Marginal DAF performance Hydraulic limited Marginal activated sludge performance Organic overload Limited aeration capacity no standby facilities High operating temperatures

Background and Pre-Upgrade Facilities ENVIRON recommendations (2001) Provide additional flotation train Activated sludge system (near term) Increase MLSS/MLVSS (i.e., lower F/M) Add standby aeration capacity Decrease aeration basin temperatures Activated sludge system (long term) Add additional bioreactor aeration and clarifier capacity Design for nitrogen removal (nitrification-denitrification) Limited footprint consider state-of-the-art integral clarifier system

Upgrade Design and Implementation 2002 ENVIRON Feasibility Study Feasibility level l design and cost estimates t for new fourth treatment t t train New fourth train to include Induced Gas Flotation Closed Circuit Cooling Tower Activated sludge with nitrification-denitrification ADVENT Integral System (AIS) technology

Conventional System Aspects Influent Wastewater CENTRAL MOTOR/GEAR DRIVE MECHANISM AEROBIC BASIN Treated Effluent SECONDARY CLARIFIER STRUCTURAL SHELL SLUDGE SCRAPPER MECHANISM Conventional clarifier has capital and operating constraints... Return Activated Sludge SLUDGE RETURN PUMPS Concrete or steel structural shell to hold 3-5 m of water. Internal sludge raking mechanism. Sludge return pumps and piping. Aeration Basins Clarifiers LARGE FOOTPRINT

What is The ADVENT Integral System (AIS)? Basically, a Cost-Efficient Reconfiguration of the Conventional Activated Sludge Process

AIS Components Patented Induced Downward Velocity allows higher concentrations of MLSS. System MLSS, mg/l Conventional Activated Sludge 2,000 to 4,000 AIS 6,000 to 8,000 3 1. Influent 5 5 2. Mixed Liquor Inlet to Airlift Pump 3. Deaeration / Transition / Flocculation Effluent (DTF) to Clarifier 4 4. Center Well Discharge 2 5. Effluent over Weir & to Final Discharge 8 1 6 7 6. Thickened MLSS Return to Aeration Basin 7. Aeration Current to Remove MLSS from Clarifier 8. Waste Excess Biomass

DTF Components TRANSITION CHANNEL FLOCCULATION AIR LIFT PUMP DEAERATION CHAMBER DART VALVE FOR VARIABLE LEVEL CONTROL FOAM SKIMMING AND FLOCCULATION ENHANCEMENT DTF system components enhance coagulation and flocculation of biomass particles Each DTF is configured and calibrated to maintain maximum degassing/biomass flocculation Excellent removal of surfactant, oils and foaming materials before clarifier. Can integrate polishing chemical treatment for PO 4, heavy metals, F -, etc. The DTF is designed ed to be operator-free ee with minimal or no maintenance. CLARIFIER TRANSITION CHANNEL

The First AIS System (1993)- CIRCULAR Configuration... GE Plastics Grangemouth, Scotland

The AIS System - System Configurations The five most common configurations are... Rectangular Peripheral Internal Pyramidal Circular Square

Upgrade Design and Implementation Biological Treatment Chemistry Organic Removal Biological Oxidation of Organics (e.g., Hydrocarbons, Phenols) to Carbon Dioxide and Water: C 6 H 5 OH + 7O 2 6CO 2 + 3H 2 O + new bacteria Nitrification Biological Oxidation of Ammonia to Nitrate: NH 4+ + 2O 2 + 2HCO 3 - NO 3- + H 2 0 + 2H 2 CO 3 + new bacteria Denitrification Biological Oxidation of Organics and Conversion of Nitrate to Nitrogen Gas: NO 3- +0.83CH 3 OH + 0.17H 2 CO 3 0.5N 2 +1.33H 2 0 + HCO 3- + new bacteria HETEROTROPHS AUTOTROPHS Strict aerobes, must have D.O. Aerobic w/d.o. Anoxic w/no D.O. but NO 3

Upgrade Design and Implementation Conventional Nitrification-Denitrification A Typical Nitrifying-Denitrifying Activated Sludge System... Influent Aerobic Basin Secondary Clarifier Treated Effluent Anoxic Basin Nitrate Recycle Return Activated Sludge

Upgrade Design and Implementation AIS Nitrification-Denitrification Control Valve X Nitrated Recycle Influent Wastewater AIR LIFT PUMP AEROBIC BASIN Treated Effluent AIS INTEGRAL CLARIFIER ANOXIC BASIN Denitrified Water (Gravity Flow)

First Major AIS Nitrification-Denitrification System NH 4 -N = 4,000 mg/l Clarification Aerobic Zone Influent Jet Mixing Anoxic Zone United States Steel Coke Plant, Gary, Indiana

Upgrade Design and Implementation AIS Flow Path

Modular Ring Configuration PERIPHERAL ANOXIC & CENTRAL AEROBIC ZONES MODULAR RING CLARIFIER PERIPHERAL ANOXIC ZONE CENTRAL AEROBIC ZONE DTF CLARIFIER FEED STRUCTURE WALKWAYS & WEIRS

Minor Off-Gas Off-Gas Pretreated Influent Mixer Recycle for Nitrate Removal Air Lift Pump Treated Effluent ANOXIC STAGE (Biodegradable Organics, Benzene & Nitrate Removal) Return Activated Sludge Aeration Grid AEROBIC STAGE (Biodegradable Pretreated Organics, Benzene & Influent Ammonia Removal) 1 Off-Gas Minor Off-Gas Off-Gas Blower Air 6 Integral Secondary Clarifier Integral Secondar y Clarifier 9 9 10 Treated Effluent Air Lift Pump 7 7 5 AEROBIC 2 nd STAGE (Zone 2-Series Polishing) Recycled Activated Sludge Turbine Mixer ANOXIC 1 st STAGE (Thoroughly Mixed) 2 Eight Pipe Connectors From Anoxic To Aerobic Stage 3 Recycled Activated Sludge 4 AEROBIC 2 nd STAGE (Zone 1-Thoroughly Mixed) Aeration Grid 8 8 Aeration Grid Blower Air

Upgrade Design and Implementation AIS Flow Path Marathon Oil Co. Louisiana Refining Division Garyville, LA Influent Design Second Stage: Aerobic Zone Second Stage: Aerobic Zone First Stage: Anoxic Or Aerobic Zone (Involves Turning Aeration Header One Valve) Flow = 900 gpm (design) = 1,400 gpm (max) COD = 6,000 lbs/day TKN = 485 lbs/day Effluent Design BOD 5 (s) < 15 mg/l NH 3 -N <5mg/L NO 3 -N < 6 mg/l TSS < 30 mg/l

Upgrade Design and Implementation Front End Engineering Design (FEED) in 2003 AIS Contract Awarded April 2004 Technology, Design and Startup by The ADVENT Group, Inc. (now ENVIRON) Reactor Fabrication and Construction by Matrix Service, Inc. AIS Commissioned in April 2005 Performance Test Completed July 2005

Fourth Train Construction The AIS System: Refineries Nitrification--Denitrification Nitrification Closed Circuit C li TTower Cooling MarathonAshland REFINERY Garyville, LA UNICELL Induced Air Floatation

Performance 2007 AIS Nitrogen Balance: Short Term Nitrates Are Annually Reported on Marathon s Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Marathon and ENVIRON Executed a One Week Sampling and Analysis Effort in July 2007 to Develop a Nitrogen Balance for AIS Train One

Performance 2007 AIS Nitrogen Balance: Short Term AIS Influent Characteristics PARAMETER UNITS MONDAY TUEDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY AVERAGE FLOW gpm 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,033 1,025 1,072 COD mg/l 372 260 354 307 300 318 TKN mg/l 21 18 20 18 16 19 NH 3 -N mg/l 15 16 16 16 15 16 NO 3 -N mg/l < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 TSS mg/l 34 44 95 77 50 60 AIS Effluent Characteristics PARAMETER UNITS MONDAY TUEDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY AVERAGE FLOW gpm 1,088 1,096 1,085 977 1,017 1,052 COD (s) mg/l 40 38 43 55 43 44 TKN (s) mg/l 1.3 2.3 1.3 2.3 1.8 1.8 NH 3 -N (s) mg/l 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.2 1.3 NO 3 -N (s) mg/l 1.5 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 TSS mg/l 19 19 18 23 17 19

Performance 2007 AIS Nitrogen Balance: Short Term Conclusions of the Study Average Total Nitrogen Removal Efficiency During the Study was ~ 89% Denitrification in the AIS was Confirmed Presents an Opportunity for TRI Reduction Without Denitrification ~ 87 tons/yr NO 3 (AIS Only, Assumes 10 mg/l Effluent NO 3 -N) With Denitrification ~ 15 tons/yr NO 3 (AIS Only, Based on 2007 Average Effluent NO 3 -N of 1.7 3 3 mg/l)

Performance: Long Term 2007 AIS Ammonia & Nitrate Concentrations 35 14 2007 Avg Influent NH3-N = 16.6 mg/l 2007 Avg Effluent NH3-N = 1.2 mg/l 2007 Avg Effluent NO3-N = 1.7 mg/l 30 12 25 10 H3-N (mg/l) N 20 15 8 6 O3-N (mg/l) N 10 4 5 2 0 Jan-07 Feb-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Dec-07 0 Effluent NH3-N Influent NH3-N Effluent NO3-N

2-Feb-06 9-Feb-06 26-Jan-06 19-Jan-06 12-Jan-06 Performance: Long Term Marathon Garyville WWTP Effluent NH3-N 3.00 2.50 200 2.00 1.50 NH3-N (mg/l) 1.00 0.50 0.00 22-Sep-05 29-Sep-05 6-Oct-05 13-Oct-05 20-Oct-05 27-Oct-05 3-Nov-05 10-Nov-05 17-Nov-05 24-Nov-05 1-Dec-05 8-Dec-05 15-Dec-05 22-Dec-05 29-Dec-05 5-Jan-06 AIS Conventional Clarifiers

9-Feb-06 2-Feb-06 26-Jan-06 Performance: Long Term Marathon Garyville WWTP Effluent TOC 40 35 30 25 20 TOC (mg/l) 15 10 5 0 22-Sep-05 29-Sep-05 6-Oct-05 13-Oct-05 20-Oct-05 27-Oct-05 3-Nov-05 10-Nov-05 17-Nov-05 24-Nov-05 1-Dec-05 8-Dec-05 15-Dec-05 22-Dec-05 29-Dec-05 5-Jan-06 12-Jan-06 19-Jan-06 AIS West Clarifier Mid Clarifier East Clarifier

2/9/2006 1/26/2006 2/2/2006 2 1/ 1/12/2006 1/19/2006 1/ 1/ Performance: Long Term Marathon Garyville WWTP Clarifier Composite Effluent COD 180 160 140 120 100 80 105 mg/l avg COD COD (mg/l) 60 40 20 0 9/22/2005 9/29/2005 10/6/2005 10/ 0/13/2005 10/ 0/20/2005 10/ 0/27/2005 11/3/2005 11/ 1/10/2005 11/ 1/17/2005 11/ 1/24/2005 12/1/2005 12/8/2005 12/ 2/15/2005 12/ 2/22/2005 12/ 2/29/2005 1/5/2006 7-day Rollling Avg Avg 24-hr Avg

2-Feb-06 9-Feb-06 26-Jan-06 Performance: Long Term Marathon Garyville WWTP Effluent Turbidity 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 Turbidity (NTU) 10.00 5.00 0.00 22-Sep-05 29-Sep-05 6-Oct-05 13-Oct-05 20-Oct-05 27-Oct-05 3-Nov-05 10-Nov-05 17-Nov-05 24-Nov-05 1-Dec-05 8-Dec-05 15-Dec-05 22-Dec-05 29-Dec-05 5-Jan-06 12-Jan-06 19-Jan-06 AIS West Clarifier Mid Clarifier East Clarifier

2008 Comparative Effluent Turbidity AIS Effluent Turbidity 65.0 60.0 55.0 50.0 45.0 40.0 ty (NTU) Turbidit 35.0 30.0 25.0 Three External Clarifiers One Integrated Clarifier 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 AIS East Clarifier Middle Clarifier West Clarifier

2008 AIS TOC Performance AIS Total Organic Carbon Removal 280 260 240 220 200 180 TOC (mg/l) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Influent TOC Effluent TOC

2008 AIS Effluent NO 3 -N AIS Nitrogen Removal 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 NH3-N / NO3-N (mg/l L) 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Effluent NO3-NN Influent NH3-NN

Recent Developments Garyville Major Expansion Project 180,000 bbls/day capacity expansion at LRD New 5 th Train (AIS Train Two) under construction at WWTP Potential ti to treat t API/DGF and other WWTP VOC emissions i with AIS VOC emissions are vented through aeration blowers into coarse or fine bubble diffusers along with normal air for biotreatment Low surface area for AIS is optimum for VOC emissions modeling

VOC Off-Gas Potential From Conventional Activated with External Clarifier (High Surface Area)

VOC Off-Gas Potential From Conventional Activated with Integrated Clarifier (Low Surface Area)

Optimum Configuration for VOC Off-Gas Modeling

Authors Dr. Carl E. Adams, Jr., Global Practice Leader, Integrated Industrial Wastewater Management ENVIRON International ti Corporation cadams@environcorp.com Mr. Wally E. Dows, III; ES&S Manager Marathon Oil Company, Louisiana Refining Division wedows@marathonoil.com Mr. John Driver, Project Manager ENVIRON International Corporation jdriver@environcorp.com Mr. Chad Louque; Operations Supervisor Marathon Oil Company, Louisiana Refining Division cplouque@marathonoil.com