BLEVE Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion

Similar documents
<eps. Vapor Cloud Explosion, BLEVE, and Flash Fire Hazards. Guidelines for %WILEY. Pressure Vessel Burst, Second Edition

STUDY ON THE HARM EFFECT OF LIQUID HYDROGEN RELEASE BY CONSEQUENCE MODELING

Consequence Modeling and PSM Wilbert Lee Senior Staff Process Risk Engineer Chevron Energy Technology Company

2012 International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology Safety aspects of the use of LNG for marine propulsion

HAZARD EVALUATION USING ALOHA TOOL IN STORAGE AREA OF AN OIL REFINERY

Fairhaven COAST GUARD. Hookton Channel. Boat Basin. Substation. Parking Area. Jefferson. Dock Docks Beacon BM 13. Oil. Gas. Sewage Disposal UNION ST.

Class-2 Hazmat Transportation Consequence Assessment On Surrounding Population

Risk Analysis for the Infrastructure of a Hydrogen Economy

Hazards Associated with Hydrogen Infrastructure

Analysis of hazard area associated with hydrogen gas transmission. pipelines

VCE risks at LNG export facilities

areas. Literature was reviewed under broad relevant heads and the inferences

MATH 1050Q Mathematical Modeling in the Environment

Comparative Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) Approach ON large Scale Underground Pipelines. Dohyung KIM, Jungwhan KIM, Seungho JUNG

Consequence Modeling and PSM Wilbert Lee Safety Technology Unit Chevron Energy Technology Company

CHAPTER 5 FLAME & EXPLOSION

Modeling of Fire and Explosion at Bulk Storage of Hazardous Flammable Substances

A brief history of LNG and natural gas hazard research - what are the remaining challenges?

Fire Risk Assessment for Ammonia Onshore Export Terminal

Modelling the Consequences of Explosion, Fire and Gas Leakage in Domestic Cylinders Containing LPG

Designing an Optimal Safe Layout for a Fuel Storage Tanks Farm: Case Study of Jaipur Oil Depot

The general design of a LNG-terminal. Background

THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Estimation of Boil-off-Gas BOG from Refrigerated Vessels in Liquefied Natural Gas Plant

Consequence-based Safety Distances and Mitigation Measures for Gaseous Hydrogen Refueling Stations

Rigorous Simulation of LPG Releases from Accidental Leaks

Experimental Study of LNG Transportation Tank Leakage, Pool Fire Suppression

Washington State Ferries

innovative entrepreneurial global 1

Safety Guidelines during LNG Bunkering Operations. Dimitrios Dalaklis Associate Professor (Safety & Security)

International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN (USA): IJCRGG ISSN: Vol.8, No.4, pp , 2015

Chapter 12 Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (Unplanned Events)

PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND RISK HAZARD ANALYSIS. GORDON MCKAY PhD, DSc

Source Characterization of Ammonia Accidental Releases for Various Storage and Process Conditions

RISK ASSESSMENT FOR FURNACE OIL STORAGE TANK:

Properties of LNG Don Juckett US Department of Energy February 12, 2002 LNG Workshop Solomons, MD. U.S. Department of Energy

SITING STUDY FOR THE GRASSY POINT LNG TRANSSHIPMENT AND STORAGE TERMINAL

Kinder Morgan Canada

LNG Hazards. and Their Assessment. Presented by Ertugrul Alp, PhD, PEng, MCIC

Safety challenges in view of the upcoming hydrogen economy: An overview

Quantitative Risk Assessment. Final Report

Construction of Safety Risk Management Platform for Storage Tank Concentration Zone in the Port Area

ExxonMobil SYU LFC Interim Trucking Quantitative Risk Analysis

Assessment of Toxic Gas Dispersion using Phast and Panache

PUBLIC SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT OF NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS PIPELINES. Michael J. Zelensky, M.Sc., P.Eng. W. Arthur J. Springer, M.Sc., P.Eng.

Saves your life Protects your health Preserves your equipment Makes your customers happy Minimises risks Protects the environment

Large scale pressurised LNG BLEVE experiments

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MARINE ASPECTS OF LNG FPSOs (FLOATING PRODUCTION, STORAGE AND OFFLOAD) UNITS. Braemar Engineering

Combustible Gas Issues in Nuclear Safety Panel Discussion

QUANTITATIVE RISK MAPPING OF URBAN GAS PIPELINE NETWORKS USING GIS

Pipeline Risk Management

Handling the cryo factor

PEMBINA PORTLAND PROPANE TERMINAL

Amec Foster Wheeler. Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) E2 Plans: Environmental Emergencies Management

Environmental Assessment Report of M/s Henkel Adhesive Technology India Pvt. Ltd., at Plot D-4/1, Kurkumbh MIDC area, Tal- Daund Dist- Pune

LNG basics. Juan Manuel Martín Ordax

Application of Fuzzy Logic Approach to Consequence Modeling in Process Industries

What happens when LNG is released underwater? Does a LNG pool form on the water surface? What are the attributes of the vapor released?

Accident investigations. Kees van Wingerden Gexcon

Guidance on Hazard and Safety Analyses of LPG Spills on Water

Knowledge Objectives (2 of 2) Skills Objectives. Introduction (1 of 2) Introduction (2 of 2) 12/20/2013

E29. Emergency management area Hazardous facilities and infrastructure

Introduction to Pipeline Quantitative Risk Assessment

Estimating consequences of scenarios of batch operated process in production buildings.

A Compilation of Current LNG Technology

University of Technology Gothenburg SHIPPING AND MARINE TECHNOLOGY MARTIME ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY SYSTEMS. Cecilia Gabrielii Lecturer, PhD

CAMEO Refresher Exercise Set: December, 2012 Truck Collision Exercise

WORST-CASE CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS HYDROGEN AND GASOLINE FUELING STATION IN BERKLEY, CALIFORNIA

Pipeline Safety & Disaster Response:

Session 6: Accident Physics Liquid / cryogenic behaviour

Available online at Procedia Engineering 45 (2012 ) SHAO Hui**, DUAN Guoning

MAXCRED. Faisall Khan & S A Abbasi

SCREENING MAJOR HAZARD INSTALLATION RISK ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED SQUARE KILOMETER ARRAY SITE COMPLEX NEAR CARNARVON, NORTHERN CAPE

Quantified Risk Assessment

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Expansion of Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi Risk Assessment

Methodology to Evaluate the Consequence of Hazardous Material Releases from Multiple Tank Cars Involved in Train Accidents TRB

LNG as a Marine Fuel Environmental Impact of LNG in Emergency Scenarios

Final report Annex 2: Consequence Assessment Methods for Human Health (Task 2)

Theme - 12 Consequence Analysis: A Vital Need for Emergency Planning

PROCESS ROUTE SELECTION FOR INHERENTLY SAFER DESIGN BASED ON CONSEQUENCES ANALYSIS

Objectives. Emerging Risks Response Awareness Training. Liquefied Natural Gas

The Application of Pressure-Impulse Curves in a Blast Exceedance Analysis

Experimental Evaluation of LPG Release and Dispersion in the Enclosed Car Parks

CFD MODELING OF VAPOR CLOUD EXPLOSION, COLD BLEVE AND HOT BLEVE IN A LARGE SCALE TUNNEL

Risk Analysis of a Chlorine Handling Facility

SIMULATION AND SAFETY ANALYSIS OF THE LEAKAGE OF LIQUEFIED HYDROGEN FROM HIGH-PRESSURE CONTAINER

Transfer and Storage of Flammable Liquefied Hydrocarbon Gases

QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS OF THE WAHSATCH GAS GATHERING PIPELINE SYSTEM

Explosion Protection of Buildings

7.2 Risk Assessment 1

Explosions in a pharmaceutical plant 13/08/2003 and 09/08/2004 Linz Austria

Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications

Natural Gas. and the Liquefaction Process

'\QDPLF6LPXODWLRQRID/RZ7HPSHUDWXUH5HFWLILFDWLRQ&ROXPQDV3DUW RIDQ,*&&3RZHU3ODQW

MB 1 Contribute to the safe operation of a ship subject to IGF Code

EVALUATION OF ACCIDENTS WITH DOMINO EFFECT IN LPG STORAGE AREAS

The Many Uses of Propane Cindy T Ly

Hydrogen safety research supporting fuel cell and hydrogen market introduction

CHAPTER 1: GENERAL APPLICABILITY

LNG Release Alert Test

Transcription:

BLEVE Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion Michael Plagge Physics Department Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Institute of Process Equipment and Environmental Engineering Department of Process Design and Safety Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg October 21, 2011

Definition [1] A boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion, called BLEVE, is caused by a failure of a pressure vessel containing a flammable pressurized liquid due to exposure to fire or any kind of external heating. Example: Tank with liquid propane Pressure is suddenly released due to a valve failure or leak caused by aged material etc. Fraction of the propane will vaporize immediately Vapourization process is fed by the heat of the liquid cooling of the liquid to atmosphere boiling point Ignition of the vapour, gas and liquid leads to a fireball [1] Drysdale, D., An Introduction to Fire Dynamics, 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, 2011. 2 / 11

Example - Mexico City 1984 [2] About 5.35 a.m on the morning of 19 November 1984 a major fire and a series of explosions occured at the PEMEX LPG terminal at San Juan Ixhuatepec (San Juanico), Mexico City. Some 500 hundred people were killed and the terminal was destroyed. Sequence of events: Rupture of an eight inch pressure pipeline Safety systems failed, LPG release continued Accumulation of a LPG vapour cloud, area about 200x150 m, 2 m height Ignition of the vapour resulting in two main and a lot of minor BLEVEs, explosions and detonations as well as several severe fires Two major BLEVEs were registered with a value of over five on the Richter scale for earth quakes. Fragments and parts traveled up to 1200 m [2] Lees, F. P., Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Volume 3, 2nd Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996. 3 / 11

Example - Mexico City 1984 [2] Before the incident [2] Lees, F. P., Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Volume 3, 2nd Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996. 4 / 11

Example - Mexico City 1984 [2] After the incident [2] Lees, F. P., Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Volume 3, 2nd Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996. 5 / 11

Example - Mexico City 1984 [2] Schematic view of damage and accelerated fragments or missiles [2] Lees, F. P., Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Volume 3, 2nd Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996. 6 / 11

Fireball - Caculation example [3,4] Traffic accident caused BLEVE by a fuelling vehicle A truck filled with about 20 m 3 of liquid propane has an accident and undergoes external heating due to a fire. The full amount of propane shall be consumed in an occuring BLEVE. x in m q in kw/m 2 Effects [5] 100 89.1 3rd degree burns, 50% lethality 200 32.91 2nd degree burns 500 6.0 some pain 1000 1.53 below pain threshold x = ground distance, q = heat intensity See References and MS Excel file for equations and assumptions. [3] Lees, F. P., Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Volume 2, 2nd Ed., pp. 16/182, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996. [4] Marx, M., Advanced explosion protection, Lecture, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 2009. [5] Hyms, I., The effects on people and structures of explosion, blast, thermal radiation and toxicity, In Pitts, J.I. 1984, op. cit., see [1]. 7 / 11

Flash evapouration / Flashing A flash vapourization due to a damage or rupture of a vessel could be assumed as a point source. The concentration C in distance r and time t after flashing can be calculated by [6]: a 3 r C(r, t) = 6(kt) 1.5 π 0.5 e C 0 - initial concentration after flashing k - turbulent exchange coefficient a - diameter of the vapour cloud 2 4kt C 0 Example: Rupture of a spherical vessel containing liquid propane (about 523 m 3 ) would create a vapour cloud with a radius of 53 m. The concentration in 100 m from the vessel after 60 s will be around 104.9 mg/m 3 (equal to 0.18 ppm). Values are corrected [7]. [6] Hauptmanns, U., Technical Risks II: Incident effects, Lecture, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 2009. [7] http://gestis-en.itrust.de/nxt/gateway.dll/gestis en/p/010020.xml?f=templates&fn=default.htm 8 / 11

Flash evapouration / Flashing CERN CMS Nitrogen vessel at point 5 Concentra)on (10 m, t) Concentra)on in kg/m3 1,60 1,40 1,20 1,00 0,80 0,60 0,40 0,20 0,00 0 50 100 150 200 Time t in s Calculation of a dense gas with the point source model briefly described above. Do not use this for real applications, see Lees, F. P., Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Volume 1, 2nd Ed., pp. 15/162, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996, for dense gas modeling. 9 / 11

Flash evapouration / Flashing CERN CMS Nitrogen vessel at point 5 Concentra)on in kg/m3 0,18 0,16 0,14 0,12 0,10 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,02 0,00 Concentra)on (20 m, t) 0 50 100 150 200 Time t in s Calculation of a dense gas with the point source model briefly described above. Do not use this for real applications, see Lees, F. P., Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Volume 1, 2nd Ed., pp. 15/162, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996, for dense gas modeling. 10 / 11

Flash evapouration / Flashing CERN CMS Nitrogen vessel at point 5 0,06 Concentra)on (30 m, t) Concentra)on in kg/m3 0,05 0,04 0,03 0,02 0,01 0,00 0 50 100 150 200 Time t in s Calculation of a dense gas with the point source model briefly described above. Do not use this for real applications, see Lees, F. P., Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Volume 1, 2nd Ed., pp. 15/162, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996, for dense gas modeling. 11 / 11