CONTAINER PORT GOALS 10-2

Similar documents
CONTAINER PORT ELEMENT

CONTAINER PORT ELEMENT

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

LAND USE POLICIES BY COMMUNITY DESIGNATION

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

Are We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER

Asmoothly functioning freight transportation

Ballard-Interbay MIC Summary Statistics

SR 432 GRADE CROSSING PROJECT. April 28, 2015

CHAPTER 5: TRANSPORTATION

URBAN CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES URBAN CENTER

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 8: ECONOMICS

Transportation Toward a Sustainable Transportation System Regional Freight Strategy AAPA MARITIME ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP, Tacoma, WA

Chapter 4 Cumulative Effects

Will County Freight Advisory Council Meeting. April 11, 2017

Chapter 5 - Transportation

DIVERSIFIED RURAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE DIVERSIFIED RURAL ALL COMMUNITIES

Minnesota Statewide Freight System Plan Action Agenda Development Lead Agency (MnDOT or

Container Port Element in Washington s Growth Management Act. Traci Goodwin Senior Port Counsel Port of Seattle July 12, 2011

Chapter 1 Introduction

Based on the review of the City of Sultan s comprehensive plan, the following recommendation is proposed for action.

INLAND PORT SPECIAL PLANNING AUTHORITY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

MEMORANDUM #4. DATE: November 4, Warrenton TSP Project Management Team. Ray Delahanty, AICP, DKS Associates Kate Petak, EIT, DKS Associates

DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Department of Planning and Land Services Director

Section 7 Environmental Constraints

Once known as warehousing and distribution, the process

TRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow. Moving People and Goods

Delmarva Freight Plan

WTP Phase 2 Implementation & Freight System Plan

Session 61: Regional Transportation Planning

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

Mega Projects at WSDOT

16.1 Significant and Unavoidable Impacts

Introduction: Jason Giffen, Assistant Vice President, Planning and Green Port

ARC Freight Advisory Task Force Meeting. SOUTH FULTON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Multi-Modal Study

ARTICLE 9 INDUSTRIAL

THE NORTHWEST SEAPORT ALLIANCE MEMORANDUM

FACILITIES AND CORRIDORS (IN FEET) Use corridor

Appendix M. Criteria, Measures and Indicators for Effects Assessment

Duwamish Waterway Self Guided Tour: Turning Basin Number Three and Terminal 105 Aquatic Habitat Restoration Sites

Problem Assessment: The Bee Branch Watershed, where over 50% of Dubuque s

Truck Management ` Strategies in Los Angeles

Water Quality Stewardship Plan (WaQSP)

TRANSPORTATION PLAN Donald Vary

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

5.5 NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS AND COASTAL ZONE

Metro Vancouver Industrial Land Protection and Intensification Policies

Chapter 6 Freight Plan

Los Angeles River Master Plan Update DRAFT Vision, Goals, and Actions

Sandpoint Junction Connector

GMA Periodic Update Policy/Text Requirements

Nassau County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Conservation Element (CS) Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goal

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Table of Contents. List of Tables. 11. Advantages and Disadvantages

City of Granite Falls 2017 Comprehensive Plan Update

Nassau County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Conservation Element (CS) Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goal

2017 Freight System Plan

Logistics Park Kansas City (LPKC) Edgerton, KS. Infrastructure, Development And Transportation. September 30, 2013

GORST WATERSHED SWOT ANALYSIS AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES June 2012

For additional copies of this document in either French or English, please contact:

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 275

Community Benefits of Land Restoration

Attachment A - VISION DRAFT Environment Policy Matrix Working Draft February 14, 2019

Conditional Uses 815

Twin Cities Metro Freight Study Summary of Results

10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRATION

GNC Coalition Update. Washington Public Ports Association Trade and Transportation Committee November 18, 2015

Intermodal Logistics Centre at Enfield Environmental Assessment CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

10. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION SPECIFIC PROJECT DESCRIPTION

TRANSPORT and INFRASTRUCTURE

State of Idaho Profile

STAFF REPORT WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION COVERED SHELTERS AND BIKE RACKS

NOTICE OF DECISION BEFORE THE SKAGIT COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Worline Road Bow, WA Collins Road Sedro Woolley, WA 98284

Final Report of the Riparian Forest Buffer Panel

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017

Future of Transportation in Florida

ALBION FLATS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS

South Sounder Capital Improvements Program

Frequently Asked Questions

Land Use Vision and Transportation Strategy

Provincial Policy Statement 2014 Training Aid

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

PORT OF VANCOUVER USA Strategic Plan

Goal 1 Provide for a balanced and multimodal regional transportation system that meets existing and future needs.

2016 MAJOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: Implementation Recommendations

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION

Effects of the Panama Canal Expansion on Texas Ports and Highway Corridors. executive summary

CHAPTER 8 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

Federal Way Transit Center to Tacoma Dome Light Rail

Capital Facilities Element

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Ryan. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

GULF COAST RAIL DISTRICT VISION FOR REGIONAL RAIL

Airports in the Region Case Study

Executive Summary. The Louis Berger Group, Inc. FINAL DRAFT Page ES-1

Transcription:

ten CONTAINER PORT

CONTAINER PORT GOALS GOAL CP 1 Identify the core port and port-related container industrial area and protect the long-term function and viability of this area (see Figure 41, Core Area). GOAL CP 2 Establish an Industrial/Commercial Buffer Area around the Core Area that will protect the continued viability of the Core Area while providing for a compatible Industrial/Commercial Buffer to development in the larger surrounding area. GOAL CP 3 Promote the continued growth and vitality of port and portrelated industrial activity. GOAL CP 4 Work in partnership with the Port of Tacoma and other property owners to promote protection, restoration and enhancement of native vegetative cover, waterways, wetlands and buffers. GOAL CP 5 Provide, protect and preserve the capital facilities and essential public services needed to support activities within and beyond the Core Area. GOAL CP 6 Identify, protect and preserve the transportation infrastructure and services needed for efficient multimodal movement of goods within and between the Core Area, Industrial/Commercial Buffer Area, and the regional transportation system. 10-2

TEN CONTAINER PORT WHAT IS THIS CHAPTER ABOUT? The goals and policies in this chapter convey the City s intent to: Protect the long-term function and viability of the Port of Tacoma maritime industrial activities and services. Provide for a compatible transition for the Port of Tacoma maritime industrial area to development in the larger surrounding area. Ensure the provision, protection and preservation of capital facilities and essential public services within the Port of Tacoma maritime industrial area. Provide for efficient multimodal movement of goods within, to, and from the Port of Tacoma. Protect the habitat and shoreline areas in the Commencement Bay area. Book I: Goals + Policies 1 Introduction + Vision 2 Urban Form 3 Design + Development 4 Environment + Watershed Health 5 Housing 6 Economic Development 7 Transportation 8 Parks + Recreation 9 Public Facilities + Services 10 11 Engagement, Administration + Implementation 12 Downtown Book II: Implementation Programs + Strategies 1 Shoreline Master Program 2 Capital Facilities Program 3 Downtown Regional Growth Center Plans 4 Historic Preservation Plan WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? Port and port-related industrial activities play a vital role in the Tacoma and Pacific Northwest economy, contributing thousands of jobs and millions of dollars in revenues and state and local taxes to the region. Preservation of available industrial waterfront land for port and port-related container and industrial activity is vital to the City s economy. This element provides policy guidance to help ensure that local land use decisions are made in consideration of the long-term and widespread economic contribution of our international container ports and related industrial lands and transportation systems and to ensure that container ports continue to function effectively alongside vibrant city waterfronts. Sitcum Waterway 10-3

Husky Terminal on the Blair Waterway This element describes how the City of Tacoma and Port of Tacoma can work collaboratively to ensure the continued long-term viability of the Port, while providing for effective buffers and transition to surrounding non-industrial uses and protecting Commencement Bay, a unique shoreline environment containing river deltas, tidal creeks, freshwater and salt marshes. 10-4

GOALS + POLICIES CORE MARITIME INDUSTRIAL AREA Goal CP 1 Identify the core port and port-related container industrial area and protect the long-term function and viability of this area (see Figure 41, Core Area). Policy CP 1.1 Prioritize, protect and preserve existing and planned port uses, port-related container and industrial uses and rail-related uses. Uses Figure 41. Core and Industrial/Buffer Areas 10-5

Core Area uses Rail yard should consist primarily of cargo port terminal, port-related container and industrial activity, compatible manufacturing, industrial-related office, cargo yard, warehousing, transportation facilities, and other similar uses. Policy CP 1.2 Prohibit uses that would negatively affect the availability of land for the primary port and port-related cargo and industrial function of the Core Area. Encourage aggregation of industrial land for future development as cargo port terminals and supporting uses. Policy CP 1.3 Clearly identify and prohibit uses that are entirely incompatible with the Core Area uses. Examples may include those that attract people to the area for non-industrial purposes or that would be incompatible with typical industrial area impacts (noise, truck movement, etc.). These may include residential, general retail, temporary lodging or other similar uses. Policy CP 1.4 Reduce the potential for land use conflicts between industrial development and surrounding nonindustrial uses by providing for adequate Industrial/Commercial Buffer areas, and clear public commitment to continuation of Port and port-related cargo and industrial uses in the designated Core Area. Policy CP 1.5 Do not allow unrelated uses to gradually encroach on the Core Area through incremental development and modifications of the Core Area boundary. Consider boundary adjustments only in collaboration with the Port of Tacoma and as part of a comprehensive review of long- term port and port-related cargo and industrial land needs. APM Terminal facility on the Sitcum Waterway Log export facility at West Hylebos 1 Pier Policy CP 1.6 In the Core Area, allow for localized impacts associated with industrial activities, including noise, odor and visual character, that are appropriate and expected in heavy industrial areas but would not be allowed in other parts of the city. Noise and odor may be associated with transportation and manufacturing facilities. Visual character may include outdoor storage, relatively large building mass and impervious surface area. While localized impacts are permitted, continue to require Core Area industrial uses to be developed in a manner that protects the environment and preserves public health and safety from a citywide and regional perspective. Policy CP 1.7 Continue to work in close collaboration with the Port of Tacoma to ensure that port and port related cargo and industrial uses 10-6

remain viable and that land use development along the edges of the Core Area is thoughtfully planned to avoid land use conflicts and incompatibility. Consider collaborative efforts to develop landscape and street standards that recognize the special working character of the Core Area. Policy CP 1.8 Within the Core Area, the Port should assume a greater role in setting level of service and concurrency standards as established in the Public Facilities and Services Element. Policy CP 1.9 In order to ensure that the Core Area continues to serve future port needs, encourage the Port of Tacoma to develop and periodically update a comprehensive long-range maritime development program that assesses future cargo market demand, developing technologies, geographic constraints and other factors affecting future intermodal cargo opportunities, and land and capital investment necessary to permit Tacoma to continue to serve port and port-related cargo and industrial needs. INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL BUFFER AREA Goal CP 2 Establish an Industrial/Commercial Buffer Area around the Core Area that will protect the continued viability of the Core Area while providing for a compatible Industrial/Commercial Buffer to development in the larger surrounding area. Policy CP 2.1 Work in collaboration with adjacent jurisdictions, including Pierce County and the City of Fife, to ensure a good Industrial/Commercial Buffer from the Core Area to larger surrounding areas. Policy CP 2.2 In general, natural buffers, such as change in topography, vegetated areas and water bodies are preferred as a means to buffer and separate incompatible uses. The Industrial/Commercial Buffer Area designation is needed only where the existing geography does not provide an effective buffer. Ensure that unrelated uses in the Industrial/ Commercial Buffer Area are not allowed to gradually encroach on the Core Area boundary. The industrial/commercial Buffer Area should remain of sufficient size to provide a long-term buffer for the Core Area. Policy CP 2.3 Development standards for industrial and commercial activities in the Industrial/Commercial Buffer Area should ensure Steep bluff west of the TEMCO grain elevator 10-7

compatibility with the activity levels and physical character of adjacent less intensive community character. Port of Tacoma boat tour during Tacoma Maritime Fest Policy CP 2.4 Recognizing the importance of industrial activity to the local and regional economy, industrial uses in the Industrial/Commercial Buffer area should be preserved and promoted. Industrial uses, including non-water related industry, is compatible with and can support maritime industrial uses in the Core Area, as well as contributing to the region s economy as a whole. Policy CP 2.5 While the Industrial/Commercial Buffer Area provides for a wider range of uses than the Core Area, incompatible uses that would be impacted by the potential noise, odor and visual character of industrial areas should continue to be prohibited. This may include residential or other sensitive uses. Policy CP 2.6 Establish development or performance standards to allow for continued viability of the Industrial/Commercial Buffer Area, while protecting the livability of adjacent areas. ECONOMIC GROWTH Goal CP 3 Promote the continued growth and vitality of port and port-related industrial activity. Policy CP 3.1 Work in partnership with the Port of Tacoma to target and recruit new businesses that support port and port-related industrial activity. ZIM Djibouti navigates down the Blair Waterway to Washington United Terminals Policy CP 3.2 Identify and consider opportunities to remove obstacles to development and to incentivize businesses that support container port and port-related industrial activity. Policy CP 3.3 Consider coordinating an industrial development workforce program for local citizens. Act as a facilitator between businesses, educational institutions, trade associations and residents in order to reduce the workforce development burden of individual businesses and expand employment opportunities for citizens. 10-8

Policy CP 3.4 In order to build on the port area s reputation as a prime location of port related industry, seek opportunities, such as speaking engagements, articles and others, to highlight economic development success stories in the port area. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Goal CP 4 Work in partnership with the Port of Tacoma and other property owners to promote protection, restoration and enhancement of native vegetative cover, waterways, wetlands and buffers. Policy CP 4.1 Encourage the use of low impact development standards and stormwater features. Policy CP 4.2 Partner with the Port of Tacoma and other interested stakeholders to establish environmental improvement goals for Commencement Bay, including providing for greater baywide diversity of ecosystems, restoration of historic functions and improvement of physical conditions. Support efforts to identify funding mechanisms and legislative support for strategies to achieve these goals. Policy CP 4.3 Consider development of measures, such as LID development standards, energy efficient lighting technologies, and transportation design features, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the port area. Restored habitat at the Place of Circling Waters, located at the mouth of Hylebos Creek 10-9

PUBLIC FACILITIES + SERVICES Goal CP 5 Provide, protect and preserve the capital facilities and essential public services needed to support activities within and beyond the Core Area. Fire station 6 Policy CP 5.1 Partner with the Port to identify required new infrastructure, facilities and services needed to support port activities within the Core Area, as well as priorities for maintenance and preservation of existing infrastructure, facilities and services. By partnering with the Port, the City can make sure that future infrastructure investments are targeted and prioritized to meet the needs of the Port and the Core Area. Policy CP 5.2 Coordinate with the Port to identify the location and jurisdiction of major utility easements that are located in the Core Area; and develop and implement a utility access plan to ensure that utility providers have access at all times to all major utilities. Policy CP 5.3 Establish and implement design standards for new roadway infrastructure and developments in the Core Area that will include utility corridors and utility access plans. TRANSPORTATION Goal CP 6 Identify, protect and preserve the transportation infrastructure and services needed for efficient multimodal movement of goods within and between the Core Area, Industrial/Commercial Buffer Area, and the regional transportation system. Local freight business Policy CP 6.1 Coordinate with state and local agencies to emphasize the importance of regional freight truck corridors to state and local economic health, and support improvements planned on these corridors that enhance freight mobility. These corridors are those designated with a T-1 tonnage classification (carrying over 10 million tons of freight per year) by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) 1 as well as 1 Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). 2007. Freight and Goods Transportation System 2007 Update. 10-10

At-grade rail crossing Container yard Cargo the roads that connect the Port to the regional road System, i.e. first/last mile connector routes. Policy CP 6.2 Support improvements to the freight truck corridors that are designated as Heavy Haul Routes, as they are critical to efficient movement of goods within and between the Core Area and Industrial/Commercial Buffer Area. Policy CP 6.3 Support and encourage intermodal facilities and the transport of cargo via rail to help minimize the roadway traffic impacts related to growth in Port throughput. Freight trucks at the intersection of SR 509 and 54th Ave E Policy CP 6.4 Emphasize freight truck mobility on Heavy Haul Routes. Coordinate with the Port to develop strategies to minimize truck queues and other traffic elements that could interfere with mobility along these routes. Policy CP 6.5 Place high priority on preservation of existing roads that serve freight movement within the Core Area and Industrial/Commercial Buffer Area; and encourage the use of reinforced Portland Cement Concrete pavement along Heavy Haul Routes to maintain improved roadway conditions over longer periods of time. 10-11

Policy CP 6.6 Identify and prioritize improvements in efficiency to the roadway system, such as traffic signal timing and phasing improvements, which will improve roadway freight operations without requiring major capital investment. Policy CP 6.7 Support recommendations from the Tideflats Area Transportation Study (TATS), for improvements that will preserve and enhance freight mobility in the region. Policy CP 6.8 Coordinate with state, regional and adjacent local jurisdictions to seek joint funding opportunities for projects that enhance freight mobility in the region, including the completion of SR 167 and the I5 Port of Tacoma Road Interchange Reconfiguration project. 10-12