SCIENCE PRIORITIES OF THE

Similar documents
Prioritizing Climate Change Impacts and Action Strategies

Indicator Framework SUPPORTING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM INTO THE FUTURE. Management Board Meeting September 30, 2015

Sustainable Fisheries GIT: Fish Habitat

Chesapeake Bay Updates. Agricultural Advisory Board June 18, 2014 Andy Zemba Interstate Waters Office

Riparian Forest Buffers

Climate Change Impacts of Most Concern for CB Agreement Goal & Outcome Attainment

Riparian Forest Buffers

the ability to manage for a stable and among the jurisdictions, and productive crab population and fishery by implement accountable monitoring

The Chesapeake Bay Program Biennial Strategy Review System: A Guide to Your Quarterly Progress Meeting

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Final draft January 29, 2014

CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM BAY BAROMETER HEALTH & RESTORATION IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN - UPDATE. Update to Chesapeake Bay Program STAR January 25, 2018

Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Challenges & Opportunities

Fish Habitat Outcome Management Strategy , v.1

CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM BAY BAROMETER HEALTH & RESTORATION IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

FY2016 GIT Funding Process. Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting February 28, 2017

Fish Habitat Management Strategy Outline

Habitat GIT Fish Passage, Brook Trout, Cosatal Habitats STAC Workshop (Mike Slattery)

Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN. Habitat GIT Meeting 9 May 2017

Indicators: Characteristics, Qualities and Options. Peter Tango STAR Coordinator

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN

Chesapeake Bay Strategy Goals Framework

Crediting Conservation

Protecting & Restoring Local Waters and the Chesapeake Bay

CBP Organizational Structure and Leadership

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership s Scientific, Technical Assessment and Reporting (STAR) Team Briefing and Options Paper:

STATE OF THE BAY IN 2012

CCMP UPDATES & PDE GOALS

Biennial Strategy Review System: Logic Table and Work Plan

2014 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement:

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership s Investment in the Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative: What s Different This Time Around

Biological Uplift in Stream Restoration Projects. September 20, Presentation by: Wetlands and Waterways Program

Water Quality Standards Attainment

PCB Facts. >1 million tons produced US largest producer 40% still in use

Quarterly Progress Meeting May Toxic Contaminants Research Outcome Scott Phillips, USGS Vice Chair of TCW

Estimation of BMP Impact on Chesapeake Bay Program Management Strategies

Making the Connection: Engaging Communities in Watershed Restoration and Protection With this theme in mind the Forum Planning Committee is now

SAV Monitoring Program

Content Overview of the next Chesapeake Bay Ambient Water Quality Criteria Technical Addendum

Full Title of Priority: Enhanced Analysis and Explanation of Water-Quality Data for the TMDL Mid-Point Assessment

KEY: Use the following colors to indicate whether a Metric and Expected Response have been identified.

1: Slight Improvement

Quarterly Progress Meeting: Blue Crab

WIP Development Dashboard

Finalizing the Chesapeake Bay Health Index (BHI)

2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision. October 19, 2017 PA Phase III WIP Steering Committee Meeting

GIT 4 STRATEGY 1/22/2013

The Continued Evolution of Our Chesapeake Bay and Basin Long-term Water Quality Monitoring Program: Growing with Partnerships

Biennial Strategy Review System: Logic Table and Work Plan

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s Interim Expectations for the Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

Strategic Plan. artnership for the Delaware Estuary. Funding Support Provided by the William Penn Foundation

Riparian Forest Buffer (RFB) Management Strategy CBP Work Plan Virginia

Management Board Meeting May 10, 2018 Actions/Decisions

Chapter 4 Watershed Goals and Objectives

Citizen Science and the Chesapeake Bay Program s Water Quality Monitoring Program

Chesapeake Bay Report Card 2016

FieldDoc.org User Guide For 2017 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants. Background 2. Step 1: Register for a FieldDoc account 3

Black Duck Logic Table and Work Plan ( ) Factor Current Efforts Gap Actions (critical actions in bold) Expected Response and Application

FieldDoc.org User Guide - for 2018 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants -

Cannon River One Watershed, One Plan. POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING January 10, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN. Update to Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board June 14, 2018

Factoring in the Influence of the Conowingo Reservoir on State Allocations

RESTORE CLEAN WATER ACTIONS: Federal Water Quality Two-Year Milestones for

Toxic Contaminant Policy and Prevention Outcome Quarterly Progress Summary (Updated April 27, 2018)

Fishing and Boating: Past, Present, and Restoration Thoughts

Countywide Action Plans

FieldDoc.io User Guide For 2016 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants

Mobile Bay National Estuary Program Protecting Alabama s Most Valuable Resource

The Chesapeake Bay Blueprint:

Stream Health SHWP Management Strategy , v.1

Chesapeake Bay Program Indicator Analysis and Methods Document Forest Buffers Updated December 2017

Geographic Location. watershed-wide. Lead: LL workgroup STAR STAC. watershed-wide. Lead: LL workgroup Jurisdictions Alliance for Ches Bay

Countywide Action Plans

CHESAPEAKE BAY. DRAFT Comprehensive Water Resources and Restoration Plan. May 2018

Stream Health SHWP Management Strategy , v.2

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s Interim Expectations for the Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

June 15, 2010 Public Meeting. Byron Petrauskas Blue Ridge Environmental Solutions, Inc.

Modeling to Support Management Decisions

The Chesapeake Bay Program

ITAT Workshop on Integrating Findings to Explain Water Quality Change

Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Mid-Point Assessment

May 4, 2010 Public Meeting. Byron Petrauskas Blue Ridge Environmental Solutions, Inc.

PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. Strategic Plan

Julie Mawhorter, US Forest Service Northeast Area State & Private Forestry, Chesapeake Bay Program

Session I: Introduction

Full Title of Priority: Enhanced Analysis and Explanation of Water-Quality Data for the TMDL Mid-Point Assessment

Preliminary data from nontraditional

Y2012. Action Plan. Public Review Draft. Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Executive Order

Chesapeake Bay Nitrogen Assessments

Chesapeake Bay: Citizen Science and Executive Order Michelle Ryan

Guiding the Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay: The EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership. Keely Clifford U.S. Embassy Paris

2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections

THE STATE CHESAPEAKE BAY. A Report to the Citizens of the Bay Region OF THE

Reducing Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sediment Pollution Progress Update. Jeff Corbin, Senior Advisor to the EPA Administrator

C. Staffing Needs Approximately 150 staff days TSA #3 staff time will also be utilized.

Land Conservation & Chesapeake Restoration

THE PROCESS OF NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND THE

Action Plan. Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Executive Order March 30, 2012

Transcription:

SCIENCE PRIORITIES OF THE GOAL IMPLEMENTATION TEAMS AND WORKGROUPS STAC Meeting December 9, 2015 Scientific, Technical Assessment and Reporting Team Presenters: Scott Phillips & Mindy Ehrich

OUTLINE Interacting with Goal Team on Science Needs of New Bay Agreement Status of Indicators & Monitoring for Outcomes High Priority Science Needs Next Steps and Discussion

ST

SCIENCE NEEDS GATHERED DECISION FRAMEWORK NEEDS & GAPS Identified GITs PRIORITIZED MANY UNMET SCIENCE NEEDS STAC and STAR Discussion: Ways to prioritize needs Applying existing resources Expanding science capacity Note: Climate Workgroup needs are NOT incorporated.

OVERVIEW: OUTCOMES WITH ESTABLISHED INDICATORS & MONITORING PROGRAMS Resources: Blue Crab Abundance and Blue Crab Management Fish Passage Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Protected Lands 2017 and 2025 Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs) Water Quality Standards Attainment and Monitoring Outreach: Public Access Science Needs Still Exist

OVERVIEW: OUTCOMES WITH INDICATORS & MONITORING PLANS UNDER DEVELOPMENT Resources: Oyster Forage Fish Brook Trout Stream Health Wetlands Black Duck Forest Buffer Tree Canopy Healthy Watersheds Toxic Contaminants Policy and Prevention Outreach: Citizen Stewardship Student Sustainable Schools Environmental Literacy Status of Indicator Development or Monitoring Plans Vary Assistance Needed Varies

OVERVIEW: OUTCOMES WITHOUT INDICATORS Resources: Fish Habitat Outreach: Local Leadership Diversity No Indicators of Progress Currently The Others: Land Use Methods and Metrics Development Land Use Options Evaluation Climate Monitoring and Assessment Climate Adaptation Toxic Contaminants Research

HIGH PRIORITY NEEDS Types of Needs Indicator Support - Technical Guidance Monitoring Support - Getting Additional Data Research - Improved Understanding

INDICATOR SUPPORT: FISHERIES Oysters Identify an interim indicator before tributaries considered restored. Fish Habitat INDICATOR that captures sub-tidal, nearshore, intertidal, non-tidal warm, cold and upstream waters, and tidal areas.

INDICATOR SUPPORT: HABITAT Brook Trout Translation of sampling data into an indicator depicting progress toward the 8% increase in occupied patch area. Stream Health 1. Besides the Chessie BIBI, what stream qualities should be a part of the indicator and how so? 2. Support to gather data and determine the Chessie BIBI scores to report progress in future years Black Duck Guidance with using the habitat prioritization map (to be refined by Spring 2016) to develop a habitat-based indicator.

INDICATOR SUPPORT: WATER QUALITY Water Quality Identification of main indicators of for TMDL and water-quality standards (numerous metrics exist currently). Toxic Contaminants More expertise needed for the following: PCB Strategy 1. Map of impaired areas for PCBs, TMDL locations, where TMDLs are being developed 2. Fish tissue concentrations Bay-wide 3. Fish advisory mapping 4. Sources and loading calculations Research Strategy

INDICATOR SUPPORT: HEALTHY WATERSHEDS Formation of a cross-git tracking workgroup to track health of the state-identified healthy watersheds in future. 1. What metrics should be evaluated? 2. How do we determine watershed status? 3. Assessment of watershed protection priorities. 4. Determine a way to track marginally healthy waters and watersheds.

INDICATOR SUPPORT: STEWARDSHIP AND LOCAL LEADERSHIP Environmental Literacy 1. Continued analysis of the ELIT survey results (Medium). 2. Identification of the metrics and indicators to use from the survey. 3. Mapping and visualization of the results. Potential Continuation of TetraTech Funding Local Leadership Baseline Best way to use funding to establish a baseline.

MONITORING: FISHERIES Oysters Monitoring or funding to monitor restoration sites post-construction. Fisheries: Blue Crab / Forage Fish / Fish Habitat Shallow water fish surveying. Blue Crab 1. Funding for stock assessment. 2. Funding to continue gear efficiency study between MD and VA surveys.

MONITORING: FISHERIES Forage Fish 1. Increased sampling and monitoring of forage fish in all their habitats. 2. Zooplankton & phytoplankton monitoring. Fish Habitat Measuring fish in actual habitat areas, especially the identified species of interest in the 5 habitat classifications and understanding how they interact and depend on these environments.

MONITORING: HABITAT Wetlands Funding to improve mapping of tidal and non-tidal wetlands. There is a pending proposal from PA to work with Upper Susquehanna Coalition to conduct a Derived Supplement to NWI for PA by September 2016. SAV Continued funding for aerial surveys. Brook Trout Continued funding for brook trout monitoring (summer of 2016 and beyond).

MONITORING: STEWARDSHIP Citizen Stewardship OpinionWorks assisting with developing a stewardship index baseline with a survey but.funding needed for 1. Increased Baseline Monitoring -> Additional funds for full baseline measurement with statistical significance for each jurisdiction. 2. Future Assessment -> Funding for repeat surveying in the future (every few years).

RESEARCH NEEDS Blue Crabs 1. Better characterize recreational harvest or funding to continue. 2. Integrating summer trawl data into population assessment and understanding the life of a crab from the winter dredge survey to full grown (account for losses and changes between surveys). Fish Habitat Understand habitat requirements of fish and how habitat conditions affect productivity, health, and function.

RESEARCH NEEDS Land Use Methods and Metrics Need: Approaches for IMPACT of conversion on water quality, healthy watersheds and communities. Land Use Options 1. Review/study to determine the range of policy options and tools 2. Create an online repository of the study results Toxic Contaminants How can we integrate toxic contaminant reductions through multi-benefits of BMPs for TMDL? Water Quality: MPA (enhance models and explain trends)

CHALLENGES AND DISCUSSION Challenges Science needs greatly exceed existing capacity Current CBPO resources have water-quality focus Limited ability to address other GIT priorities Discussion Evolution of STAR and STAC Strategically prioritize science needs Better coordinate existing activities Ways to expand science capacity of CBP

STAR Information Management & GIS Support and Synthesis Integrated Monitoring Networks Workgroup Data Integrity Workgroup Status and Trends Team Explain Ecosystem Condition and Change Teams Modeling Workgroup Climate Change Workgroup

SOME IDEAS AND NEXT STEPS Short-term: STAC workshops on: Aligning resources Expanding monitoring needs Existing efforts Approach to set priorities Expand STAR WG capacity Longer-term: Collaborate with new partners Future STAC workshops to address needs Incentives and funding to build science capacity Contact Mindy at mehrich@chesapeakebay.net with specific GIT need questions