Assessing the Impact:

Similar documents
ASTM E Standard Update. Key Revisions to E Impacting Phase I Investigations

ASTM E Updates and Impacts on Vapor Intrusion Evaluation. Presented by Gordon Cobb, PhD ENVIRON International Corporation

Clearing Up the Confusion About the ASTM E Phase I ESA Standard

VAPOR ENCROACHMENT VAPOR INTRUSION; TRANSACTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THE POSSIBLE VAPOR INTRUSION PATHWAY

Further Investigation Phase I/II & Site Remediation

Environmental Site Assessment for Lenders April EPA All Appropriate Inquiry and. ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

History of Vapor Intrusion

Have You Caught a Case of the Vapors?

Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments

Graduated Steps of Environmental Due Diligence

Environmental Due Diligence Principals for CRE Professionals

ASTM E Changes and Implications.

LAND RECYCLING & BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. April 2016 El Centro CA

Tier 1 Vapor Migration Screening for Property Transactions Using ASTM E

Vapor Intrusion Assessment. Kaitlyn S. Rhonehouse, P.E. Florida Brownfield Association 16 th Annual Conference, Brownfields in Motion

Vapor Encroachment Screening Under the Newly-Revised ASTM E Standard

Environmental Cleanup in Oregon

Brownfields Prevention Transformed. Deborah Orr August 2008

Johanna Heywood, PE, PG

BROWNFIELDS PRIMER. Chicago - June 2017

Request for Proposals Qualified Environmental Professional

EPA s Final Vapor Intrusion Guidance

I. Statewide Application of Wisconsin's Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program for Environmental Data Collection

Phase 1 ESA Phase 2 ESA Site Assessment. Cleanup Planning Cleanup CNFA NFA. Gas Tank Removal at Closed Gas Station

TABLE NO. 2 Industrial-Commercial

EPA S 2015 vapor intrusion guides What do they mean for your facility?

The Increasingly Steep Climb to Regulatory Closure for Contaminated Sites by Keith B. Walker*

Initiation of Emerging Contaminants Characterization and Response Actions for Protection of Human Health

Atlanta SMAC Conference April 18, 2017

Proposed MCP Amendments

Vapor Intrusion in Massachusetts Gerard Martin

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) Phase II ESA. Contaminant Remediation. Underground Storage Tank (UST) Removal/Closure

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

Lecture 24. Brownfields and Superfund reform

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Review/Reuse Recommendations Pagnotti Property, Maffett and South Main Streets, Plains Township, PA

Vapor Intrusion in New York: Five Years After Release of New York s Strategy and Vapor Intrusion Guidance By Katherine Rahill

Guidance for Renewable Energy Development Projects on Preferred Sites in Vermont. Prepared by Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation

COMPARISON BETWEEN THE US AND FRANCE:

Brownfields Redevelopment Steps and Resources

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) or NEPA Environmental Assessment (EA): Which Do You Need?

EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE WITH THIRD-PARTY DISCRIMINATION COVERAGE THIS IS AN APPLICATION FORM FOR A CLAIMS MADE POLICY

Fill Material and Soil Management

ANALYSIS OF BROWNFIELD CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES

Eligibility Requirements and Procedures for Risk-Based Remediation of Industrial Sites Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A to

Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 14 Hazardous Substances Response Plan. Notice of Proposed Action

MR GLOBAL LOGISTICS TERMS & CONDITIONS OF SERVICE

RISK BULLETIN. Vapor Intrusion An Emerging Environmental Liability WHAT IS VAPOR INTRUSION?

Subject Property Address. ENCON Project Number. Report Date. Prepared for

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

Indiana Perspectives on the Use of Institutional Controls for Leaking UST Sites. ASTSWMO LUST and State Fund-Financial Responsibility Workshop

Hiring An Environmental Consultant For A Brownfields Redevelopment Project

Minnesota Department of Transportation! Office of Environmental Services! Environmental Investigation Unit" Contaminated Property Management!

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD'S REVISED POLICY STATEMENT ON PRO BONO LEGAL AND VOLUNTEER SERVICES (for all NLRBU Represented Employees)

REAL ESTATE MARKET STUDY SERVICES

Corporate Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Facts About. LMA Fill Material and Soil Management Guidance. Introduction. What Soils and Fill Material are Subject to the Policy?

What is a Brownfield? and Steps for Successful Redevelopment

RECORD OF SITE CLOSURE (REMEDIAL ACTION OR CORRECTIVE ACTION) State Form (10-10) INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

Mr. Fonda Apostolopoulos, P.E. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. September 21, 2011

Committee Opinion May 6, 2008 CITY ATTORNEY PROVIDES LEGAL SERVICES TO MULTIPLE CONSTITUENTS WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION.

Land Use Control Remedial Design for Site 5 - Former Fire Training Area

Appendix I: Proposed Refinements Hazardous Materials Technical Report. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Steps for Successful Brownfields Redevelopment

MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SITE REMEDIATION SECTION

AUDIT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

OSWER DIRECTIVE Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions

Subject: Date: 7 November 2008 NICOLE Position on Proposed Soil Protection Directive (Network for Industrially Contaminated Land in Europe)

A Professional Environmental & Regulatory Compliance Corporation P.O. Box Dallas, Texas quest-env.

Private Party CERCLA Cost Recovery

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS AND PETROLEUM BROWNFIELDS. By Frank M. Grenard Johnson & Bell, Ltd. Chicago, IL SHORT HISTORICAL REFERENCE

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Environmental Cleanup and Brownfields

Assume that any action you take could ultimately be publicized, and consider how you and PCA would be perceived. When in doubt, stop and reflect.

ECONOMIC IMPACT/ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS

TG Therapeutics, Inc. Audit Committee Charter

Register of Contaminated Land Consent Conditions

LEAD IN SOIL. Commercial/Industrial Site Assessment & Remediation

The Company seeks to comply with both the letter and spirit of the laws and regulations in all jurisdictions in which it operates.

Environmental Group Liability In Coal Ash Management

Vapor Intrusion: A Game Changer For Environmental Due Diligence And Environmental Liability

Client Alert. An Overview of EPA's New Rules Regulating the Underground Injection of Carbon Dioxide

RISK AND AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Executive Strategies, Inc. Trusted Advisors to the Staffing Industry Office: (313)

ISM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Remediation Certificates 101

THIS IS AN APPLICATION FORM FOR A CLAIMS FIRST MADE AND REPORTED POLICY

Vapour Intrusion Regulatory Framework and Case Law Review

AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATERMAIN EXTENSION FROM CASPIAN AVENUE CITY OF VOLGA, SOUTH DAKOTA

New Jersey s Diane B. Allen Equal Pay Act. James M. McDonnell, Esq. and Beth L. Braddock, Esq. Jackson Lewis P.C. June 2018

Release Reporting Requirements. Stoel Rives LLP

ADMINISTRATION OF LAND RECYCLING PROGRAM FINAL RULEMAKING AMENDMENTS COMMENT AND RESPONSE DOCUMENT

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS. FOR THE PROVISION OF LEGAL SERVICES General Counsel. ISSUE DATE: December 11, DUE DATE: December 28, 2017

Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards Chapter 11 Physical Properties Data

EPS Alumni Student Forum. Environmental Consulting Perspectives & Information By: Mauricio Escobar and Nick Walchuk December 3, 2008

Future Matters US Disclosure

PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance

AIB Group plc (Holding Company)

Due Diligence we ll discuss how to go about doing it and the approach may vary

OVERVIEW CAPACITY & CONDITION

Hazardous Waste Program Overview and Update. Steve Sturgess, Program Director October 18, 2016

Future Matters US Disclosure

Transcription:

Assessing the Impact: ASTM E1527-13 and EPA s Final Rule on AAI. Presented by Michael P. Carvalho, Esq. President & Shareholder, Carvalho & Associates, P.C. Copyright 2014 Carvalho & Associates, P.C. All Rights Reserved

Purpose of Phase I ESA? Who is asking? Perspectives: -Buyer - Seller -Lender -End User - Practical

The Original Committee convened in 1989, and published the first Standard in 1993. Originally, 2 standards. The most successful selling Standard in ASTM history.

November 2013 ASTM International Publishes E1527-13: Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments On November 1, 2013, the final version of ASTM E1527-13: Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments Phase I Environmental Site Assessment process was published by ASTM International. The new standard updates the 2005 version and provides new designations for Risk-Based Closures, consideration of Vapor Intrusion Pathways, and obligates environmental consultants to evaluate HRECs against current regulatory criteria.

December 2013 U.S. EPA publishes Final Rule adopting ASTM E1527-13 On December 30, 2013, EPA published a Final Rule adopting ASTM E1527-13 as a standard that satisfies the All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) requirement for landowners liability defenses under CERCLA. EPA s adoption of the updated ASTM E1527-13 standard represents a significant development for landowners and the environmental consultants and attorneys who advise them. Innocent Landowner Defense IP did not know and had no reason to know. 42 USC 9601(25) Practice Tip: EPs need to consider the role that ASTM plays in meeting the AAI Final Rule. Why is the Phase I being completed?

Revised Definitions Recognized Environmental Condition ( RECs) Ref. 1.1.1 RECs mean the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at a property: 1.) due to any release to the environment 2.) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or 3.) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. Generally, revised definition of REC clarifies several points and incorporates concept of vapor intrusion issue. Practice Tip: VI is weaved through ASTM E1527-13.

Revised Definition De Minimis Condition Ref. 3.2.22 De Minimis Condition a condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attend of appropriate government agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis are not RECs nor CRECs Practice Tip: Enforcement priorities vary greatly by jurisdiction (intrastate, and state to state). What is an enforcement action today may be different tomorrow. Enforcement actions are greatly subjective and change with political priorities.

Revised Definition Environment Ref. 3.2.29 Adopts definition of Environment under CERCLA, 42 USC Sec. 9601(8) Practice Tips: Includes navigable waters, ocean waters, surface waters, ground water, drinking water, land surface or subsurface strata, or ambient air within the U.S. This supports the framework for including VI issues into Phase I ESAs. Practice Tip: EPs should familiarize themselves with CERCLA. Recommend annotated version of statute.

New Definitions Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CRECs) Ref. 3.2.18 CREC A REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substance or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls A condition considered by the environmental professional to be a CREC shall be listed in the findings section of the Phase I Report, and as a REC in the conclusion section of the report. Practice Tip: Imposes new obligation on EP to report on compliance with prior and current regulations and law. Practice Tip: Consider recommending review by legal counsel.

HRECs Environmental Professional must evaluate HRECs against current regulatory criteria HREC a past release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting property to any required controls. EP must determine whether the past release is a REC at the time of the Phase I ESA; if the release is a REC at the time of the time of the Phase I, then it must be included as such in the Report. Practice Tip: EP should use caution when attempting to decide with satisfaction has been achieved. Consider effect of Re-Opener provisions.

Vapor Intrusion Pathway EP Must Evaluate the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and the potential Impacts on the subject property.

ASTM E1527-13 does not define vapor intrusion. No Definition Vapor Intrusion New Standard - ASTM E2600-10 used on a voluntary basis. ASTM E1527-13 Vapor Intrusion must be considered no differently than contaminated groundwater migration in Phase I ESA.

Revised Definitions Activity Use Limitations Ref. 3.2.2 Purpose of AUL is to reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products Now expressly includes soil vapor into the definition. Includes both Institutional (legal) controls and Engineering Controls. Practice Tip: VI is weaved through ASTM E1527-13. Practice Tip: Different jurisdictions use varying terms for AUL. (e.g. DoD, CA, and Land Use Restrictions is not defined in the Brownfields Amendments.

Vapor Intrusion Pathway Not a defined term under the new standard, but numerous references to vapor and migration exist in standard.

New Definition Migrate/Migration Ref. 3.2.56 The movement of hazardous substances or petroleum product in any form, including, for example, solid and liquid at the surface or subsurface, and vapor in the subsurface. Practice Tip: Consider reviewing published literature regarding when VI can result in potential health hazards. Practice Tip: Site Recon. should include assessment of potential pathways of migration. Practice Tip: Consider referral to CIH or Toxicologist review.

New Definition Reasonable Time and Cost Ref. 8.1.5 Deletes former definitions of Reasonable Time and Cost and Practically Reviewable in favor of the 20-Day Rule. If agency doesn t produce documents within 20 calendar days, then not a reasonable time. Practice Tip: Real world rarely gives 20+ days for a Phase I ESA. Addendums? Practice Tip: Address this issue with client in proposal/contract.

Play Nice & Work together Practice Tips EPA s adoption of the updated ASTM E1527-13 standard represents a significant development for landowners, and the environmental consultants and attorneys who advise them. Seller Disclosures Representations & Warranties of Seller Know prospective use of Phase 1 ESA Know client s risk tolerance Anticipate Potential for VI issues whenever possible Involve Legal Counsel when HRECs and CRECs are present Understand Lender Environmental Risk Criteria Consider Federal Loan Program Underwriting Criteria

Parting thoughts EP plays and increasing role in public health issues.