DEBRIS REMOVAL FROM CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK JOINTS

Similar documents
Research performed in cooperation with.dot, FHWA. Improved Methods for Cleaning Joints in Concrete Bridge Decks.

Deterioration of Concrete Roads

Construction and Materials Tips

HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORATION HIGHWAYS DIVISION PAVEMENT PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES JUNE 2003

Report on. Texas Bridges. as of September Prepared by the Bridge Division Texas Department of Transportation

A STUDY OF POURED JOINT SEAL MATERIALS. D. L. O'Connor Supervising Chemical Engineer

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Structural Design of Dam Sluice Gate Walkway Slabs: Retrofit and Replacement Options

RECLAIMED GLASS AGGREGATE DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS

Material Transfer Device Effect on Pavement Smoothness Widening Joint Design & Construction

STANDARDIZED CONCRETE BRIDGES IN TEXAS. John Holt, PE, Texas Department of Transportation Ronald Medlock, PE, Texas Department of Transportation

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Field and Laboratory Air-Content Studies of Salt-Damaged Concrete Structures

CHAPTER B TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 3 rd Avenue/Central Avenue OVER THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER

Property Condition Assessment

Széchenyi István University Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Transport Sciences Department of Transport Infrastructure.

(605) Key Principles of Gravel Road Maintenance:

100 Pavement Requirements Pavement Design Concepts 200-1

BRIDGE DECK CONDITION SURVEY. SUMMARY REPORT of Research Report Number 106-lF Study ~

Solid stream nozzles. Cleaning High pressure cleaning Jet cutting Recycling of liquids and many others...

Controlling Reflection Cracking in HMA Overlays of PCC Pavement. Gary L. Fitts, P.E. Sr. Field Engineer Asphalt Institute San Antonio, Texas

USE OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PANELS FOR PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION. Emil R. Hargett M. ASC

Life Cycle Cost Analysis Pavement Options May 2002 Materials Division / Virginia Transportation Research Council TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II. - SPECIFICATIONS AND DESIGN STANDARDS TO CITY OF HEWITT, TEXAS SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION [TEXT]

Mitigation Strategies for Reflective Cracking in Pavements. Mostafa Elseifi Nirmal Dhakal

Designing Bridges for Inspectability

National Bridge Inspection Program Risk-based, Data-driven FHWA Oversight

Types of Joints in Concrete Pavements Why Seal Joints? Types of Sealants Proper Silicone Installation Inspection and Project Review Common Issues and

Why specify Surface Aggregate Classification A (SAC-A)?

Solid stream nozzles. Cleaning High pressure cleaning Jet cutting Recycling of liquids and many others...

SEAUPG Jacksonville, Florida November 14-16, 2017

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 4703 Repair Of Impact Damaged Prestressed Concrete Bridge Beams

ITEM 252 IN-PLACE FULL DEPTH COLD FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT RECYCLING

Scott Neubauer. Bridge Maintenance and Inspection Engineer Office of Bridges and Structures Iowa DOT

Department of Street Services

EverGuard Plaza Deck Roofing For Above-Grade Plaza Deck Applications

1.02 RELATED WORK: Refer to the following sections for related work: Section 4000-Concrete Materials and Methods

The work required for this project includes, but is not limited to, the following items, not listed in order of execution.

Q. Why crack seal? A. Preventive (intended to stop something undesirable from happening) Defensive, Precautionary, Deterrent, Protective.

Life Cycle Cost Analysis July 2011 Materials Division Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS V. ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION/RECONSTRUCTION...

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

AMCOT COOLING TOWER CORPORATION LRC-H & LRC-LNS CROSS FLOW COOLING TOWER OPERATIONS AND MAINTAINENCE MANUAL

PMIS Treatment Selection Questionnaire

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Irrigation Application Calibration Methods

THE RECENT STUDY OF THIN BRICK PAVEMENTS BY THE U. S. BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS. By L. W. Teller, Engineer of Tests U. S. Bureau of Public Roads.

Concrete Pavement Preservation Manual Update

Publication No. 26: Private Drinking Water Wells Types of Construction

Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide

SELECTIVE FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION BASED ON FORENSIC INVESTIGATION AND DEFLECTION ANALYSIS: SEVENTEEN YEARS CASE STUDY IN VIRGINIA

VALUE ENGINEERING FOR TxDOT PROJECT MANAGERS

Pavement Management: Making Smart Funding Decisions at WYDOT

AMERICAN CONCRETE PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION

Concrete Pavement Preservation Partial Depth Repairs

Testing of the Retrofitted T102R Bridge Railing

ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION IN TEXAS. Michael D. Hyzak, PE 1 Gregg A. Freeby, PE 2 Lloyd M. Wolf, PE 3 David P. Hohmann, PE 4 John M.

Geotechnical Exploration and Evaluation Report

Concrete Pavement Preservation Essentials

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

Shift in the natural frequencies of the deck of Bangabandhu Jamuna bridge due to CFRP strengthening

A. Texas Department Transportation 2004 Standard Specifications for Construction of Highways, Streets and Bridges (TxDOT):

JOINTED PCC PAVEMENTS

SECTION ASPHALT INTERLAYER REINFORCEMENT SYSTEM. Display hidden notes to specifier by using Tools / Options / View / Hidden Text.

COYOTE CREEK 3 LEVEE SYSTEM LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD SYSTEM ID #

Appendix A Pavement Failure Identification

SECTION PACKAGE BOOSTER PUMP STATIONS

Design of Rigid Pavements

151 First Side. Technical Assignment 2 November 16 th, William J. Buchko. AE 481w Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University

USE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE STEEL IN TEXAS BRIDGES

SCE-Singfa Sdn. Bhd. 1 of 6. Waterproofing System. Diamond Wire Sawing System

Steel Fiber Reinforcing

UNDERSTANDING PMIS: RIDE, PATCHING, AND OTHER FACTORS. Darlene C. Goehl, P.E. Dist. Pavement-Materials Engr. TxDOT - BRY

Bridge Preventative Maintenance.Act now before this happens to you! Keith Cooper, P.E. Local Bridge Program Manager

PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE

EXPERIMEN TAL PROJECTS

LONG TERM PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE PROGRAM DIRECTIVE. Program Area: General Operations Directive Number: GO-09. Date: September 14, 1998 Supersedes: S-2

(The those of the author and not necessarily those of the

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

Groundwater Control for Design & Construction

Lessons Learned on Concrete Pavement Patching Virginia Concrete Conference March 9, 2012

PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT

Project Progress Update Continued Field Evaluation of Precutting for Maintaining Asphalt Concrete Pavements with Thermal Cracking

Section 710. WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTIVE COVERS

SUDAS Revision Submittal Form

BEST PRACTICES FOR EDGE CRACKING

ATTACHMENT 50-1: PERFORMANCE AND MEASUREMENT TABLE

SHRP2 Renewal Project R23 PAVEMENT RENEWAL SOLUTIONS

Design and Construction of Concrete Overlays. By: James K. Cable, P.E. Cable Concrete Consultation

Performance of Thin Roller Compacted Concrete Pavement under Accelerated Loading

INDOT Thin Concrete Overlay Initiatives. Tommy E. Nantung INDOT Division of Research and Development

SUDAS Revision Submittal Form

Drainage Capabilities of a Nonwoven Fabric Interlayer in an Unbonded Concrete Overlay

DMS-6340, Vehicle Loop Wire Sealant

Maintenance & Rehabilitation. Treatments. Crack Sealing. Sealant Types. Asphalt Pavement Preservation: Identification of Alternative Treatments

NDDOT TRansportation Innovation Program TRIP. Presented to: Regional NDDOT- UGPTI Meetings Fall 2016

Annual Costs Any costs associated with the annual maintenance and repair of the facility.

Alligator Cracking. Light. Medium. High

BOCA Project Suitability, Design and Construction

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government 3. Recipient s Catalog No.

Transcription:

DEBRIS REMOVAL FROM CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK JOINTS SUMMARY REPORT of Research Report Number 12-2F(S) Study 2-18-73-12,«%'.J.... _.,;. : _ i A commercially available high-pressure water-jet apparatus consisting of a trailer mounted pump and a hand operated jet-gun can be used to effectively clean joints in concrete bridge decks. Cooperative Research Program of the Texas Transportation Institute and the Texas Highway Department In Cooperation with the U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration September. 1974 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE Texas A&M University College Station, Texas

Debris Removal From Concrete Bridge Deck Joints by William M. Moore This report describes the research efforts to develop improved methods for cleaning joints in concrete bridge decks. This research was initiated because of the need of highway maintenance personnel for a practical and effective technique for removing debris from joints of in-service bridges. At the beginning of this study the technique being used was to loosen the debris by hand with picks and chisels and then to blow out the loosened material with an air hose. Although the technique was effective for joints wide and shallow enough to accommodate hand tools, it was difficult and time consuming. At the outset of the study there was no known effective technique for removing debris in the deep and narrow joints of panformed bridges. It was recognized that these joints which are less than one-inch wide and about two to three-feet deep did not provide much access for debris removal. To loosen and remove debris when the only access was a very narrow slot posed a difficult problem. Thus, early in the study primary emphasis was placed on cleaning pan-formed bridge joints. It was concluded that a satisfactory cleaning technique for these joints would also be suitable for otr.er joints vrhich are gercerally shallower and more accessible. Preliminary Investigation At the outset of this study no technical references could be found that were specifically d:rected toward the problem of cleaning joints. Contacts were mode with various highway agencies and numerous mo:nufacturers of tools and equipment to find methods or equipment which might be applied to the problem. It was learned that the maintenance staff of the Louisiana Department of Highways had conducted demonstration tests of two different devices applicable to the problem. One was a high-pressure water-jet apparatus which had been used to successfully remove debris from bridge deck joints and the other was a tractormounted cutting wheel which had been used for widening joints in pavements and bridge approach slabs. Based upon these initial contracts many ideas for possible solutions to the problem were ruled out due to their lack of technical feasibility; however, several possible approaches were found.

Observations made on in-service bridges indicated that some joints in need of cleaning would require widening. Specifically it was found that most joint distress on pan-formed bridges occurs at joints of the fixed-type. These joints am typically two to three feet deep, open about one-quarter of an inch at the top, and completely closed at the bottom. It was believed impossible to remove the debris lodged in these deep and narrow wedgeshaped cavities without widening them. The research staff made arrang ements for a demonstration of the high-pressure water-jet apparatus. From this test it was concluded that an effective cleaning technique could be devised using this equipment to clean pan-formed bridge expansion joints which are typically about three-quarters of an inch wide and contain an asphalt impregnated fiber board beneath a shallow asphaltic seal. As a result of this investigative period, two approaches to joint cleaning were established. One involved a widening technique for very narrow or completely closed joints. The other involved the high-pressure water-jet apparatus which appeared capable of removing debris from joints which were at least onehalf inch wide. These two approaches were pursued concurrently in the study. Joint Widening Investigation Although an extensive search was made, no readily implementable, industrial equipment could be found that would widen the deep narrow joints like those on pan-formed bridges. However, two of several cutting methods found are believed to be technically feasible. One is the use of a diamond impregnated wire which is used in the stone quarrying industry. It would involve the design of a complex band-type saw apparatus for guiding the wire. The other feasible method is the use of a large diameter diamond saw which would involve the design of a complex driving and positioning device. The development of either of these methods would require an extensive and costly effort. Developmental Water-Jet Testing Initial developmental testing with the water-jet apparatus was done in the Bryan district by research personnel. During this period it was learned that a single circular orifice designed to produce a narrow jet stream provided better cutting action than orifices designed for other shaped streams. More effective debris removal was achieved when the apparatus was operated at its maximum design flow and pressure, i.e. 10 gpm at 10,000 psi. The back thrust of the stream from the hand-held jet-gun quickly tired the operator; thus, to provide relief, a small cart was built to hold the jet-gun. More effective operations resulted when cleaning was begun at the sides of a bridge and progressed toward the center so that a drainage channel was provided. After

Cleaning ope rations are more e ffe ctive if work begins at the sides and progresses toward the center s o that drainage is provided. the initial d evelopmental testing it was concluded tha t the apparatus was ready for pilot implementation by highway maintenan ce personnel. Pilot fi eld tests were conducted in the Fort Worth and Beaumont d istricts. Basically the maintenance personnel in these districts undertook separate two-week experimental joint cleaning programs. The results were quite successful. The personnel in b oth districts felt that the cleaning technique was far superior to any other that they had tried. It was found tha t all d ebris could be removed from pan-formed bridge expansion joints. Similar brief joint cleaning programs were undertaken b y the Pharr, Wichita Fa lls, Dallas and Waco districts. In each of these districts some a ttempts to clean the fixed -type joints on pan-formed bridges were includ ed in the tests. The results of these tests were a lso successful. The technique was found to be far superior to any other that had been tried previously in these districts. It not only cleaned the expansion joints but it also satisfactorily cleaned the narrow fixed joints. All d e tectable d ebris except a few tightly wedged pebbles was removed from the fixed joints. It was concluded that such d ebris removal would reduce and probably eliminate future distress at these joints. Conclusions and Recommendations A commercially a vailable high-pressure water-jet apparatus is a practical and effective means for cleaning joints in concrete bridge decks. For effective operations the apparatus should supply a narrow jet stream of at least ten gallons per minute using a

line pressure of at least 10,000 psi. A small cart facilitates operator control and steadies the jet stream for more effective debris removal. It is apparent that the high-pressure water-jet apparatus can be used to remove debris from joints in concrete pavements. However, caution in such use is recommended because of the possibility of introducing water into the pavement subgrade. This is not a factor on bridges and was not investigated in the research. Although an extensive search was made, no readily implementable equipment appears to be available for widening the deep narrow joints like those on pan-formed bridges. However, two different stone sawing techniques could be applied to the problem. Either of them will require extensive apparatus development which is not believed to be warranted at this time. Almost all of the pier-cap distress on pan-formed bridges is apparently caused by debris in the fixed joints. Therefore, it is recommended that these joints be cleaned and sealed on a routine basis to prevent additional pier-cap fractures. If after a few years of implementation this does not substantially eliminate Almos t all de tectable de bris can b e removed from fixed joints in pan-forme d bridges. A routine cleaning and sealing program for these joints is the most promising approach lo e liminate pier-cap fractures. further joint distress, it is recommended that the joint widening research begun in this study be continued.

If a pan-formed deck span is fixed at both ends and one of the ends has cracked its pier-cap----a typical type of distress~it is recommended that the dowels between the deck and the cap be cut with a welding torch prior to the cap repair. Implementation Field tests indicate that the joint-cleaning technique developed in this study for use on bridge decks is practical and effective for immediate implementation by highway maintenance personnel. The initiation of a routine cleaning and sealing program for the fixed-type joints on pan-formed bridges appears warranted as priorities permit. Caution in the use of the technique on concrete pavement joints is recommended because of the possibility of introducing water into the pavements' subgrade. The published version of this report may be obtained by addressing your request as follows: Mr. Phillip L. Wilson, Engineer-Director Planning and Research Division, D-1 OR P. 0. Box 5051 Austin, Texas 78763 (Phone (512) 475-7403 or TEX-AN 822-7403)