ABOUT APQC's OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING MEASURE LIST

Similar documents
OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT MEASURE LIST

Open Standards Benchmarking Measure List

OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING MANAGE EMPLOYEE INFORMATION MEASURE LIST

Open Standards Benchmarking Measure List

ABOUT APQC's OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING MEASURE LIST

ABOUT APQC's OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING MEASURE LIST

ABOUT APQC's OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING MEASURE LIST

OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING REWARD AND RETAIN EMPLOYEES MEASURE LIST

Open Standards Benchmarking Measure List

ABOUT APQC's OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING MEASURE LIST

Open Standards Benchmarking Measure List

ABOUT APQC's OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING MEASURE LIST

Removing Supply Chain Costs. Elemica Road Show May 13, 2009

NASPE Eugene H. Rooney, Jr. Award Nomination Category: Innovative State Human Resource Management Program

IT Economics ISSUE 01: How Do Leading CIOs Measure Their Spend?

KEY SAAS METRICS AND BENCHMARKS

CORROSION MANAGEMENT MATURITY MODEL

IT Business Management Driving Cost Transparency, Value and IT Transformation

Internal Audit Department Update. December 7, 2016 Cassaundra Rouse

Efficiency First Program

APQC s Benchmarking Portal: A User s Guide for Industry Members

TamTamy in the Cloud. SaaS

Using Process Frameworks to Get Real Work Done. Findings Review

The Right KPIs, Metrics for High-performing, Cost-saving Space Management. An Approach and Case Study

Georgia Economic Prosperity Initiative (EPI) July 16, 2014

Helping organizations worldwide work smarter, faster, and with greater confidence.

ecap Health Check Evaluation

IBM benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of Service Delivery Models for Finance and Operations functions

Building Integrated Quality Processes in Aerospace and Defense

Getting Started: The Strategic Level

RA Survey Appendix 1. All questions and answers and Additional insights. TM Forum Revenue Assurance Team TM Forum 1 V2015.4

An Garda Síochána. Global Energy Management System Implementation: Case Study. Republic of Ireland

Overview First Draft of NERC s 2014 Business Plan and Budget

June HCM Webinar: HR Shared Services Benchmarking Results, Trends, and Key Metrics. Karen Hilton, ScottMadden Scott Manning, ScottMadden

Creating Value at Semiconductor Companies

Master Data Governance & SAP Information Steward Integration. Jens Sauer, SAP Switzerland September 25 th, 2013

Test Maturity Assessment and Improvement Using TPI and Quality Blueprint. Performance driven. Quality assured.

The CSCMP/APQC Alliance. Everything You Need to Improve Your Organization s Supply Chain Performance Thursday, February 17, 2011

IT Strategic Alignment Benchmark

Organizing for BI. Halil Aksu Istanbul, Bogazici University

Drive Performance From Your Riverbed SteelHead Investment

Driving Global Change Through Process Discipline 2011 APQC Member Meeting, November 7-11, 2011

ECONOMIC AND STRATEGIC BENEFITS

KPI ENCYCLOPEDIA. A Comprehensive Collection of KPI Definitions for PHARMACEUTICALS

Utilities Benchmarks, KPI Definitions & Measurement Details

Human Resources (HR) Staffing Ratio

Microsoft. Partner opportunity. Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Marketing

BI360 for Not for Profit Organizations. Enabling World-class Decisions for Not for Profit Organizations A Solver Vertical Industry White Paper

2015 APQC and SCOTTMADDEN FINANCE SHARED SERVICES PARTICIPANT REPORT

Version manage enterprise risk, compliance, and resiliency. The Framework for Process Improvement. History

Data Collection for Agile Projects Blaze Smallwood ICEAA Conference 2016

Information Technology Analysis Hydro-Quebec Management Presentation. October 30th 2004

Maximize the Strategic Value of Your Service Professionals. Shawn Fox Industry Director Professional Services

UPK PRE-BUILT CONTENT FOR: ORACLE FUSION 11g RELEASE 1

BI360 for Retail Companies. Enabling World-class Decisions for Retail Companies A Solver Vertical Industry White Paper

The Q Performance Marketer s Benchmark Report: Vital Search, Social & Display Performance Data by Device

BEST PRACTICES IN FACILITIES MANAGEMENT: AN ADC & JLL ROUNDTABLE

Become a high-performing, agile contact center focused on the customer experience

About Mirror42. Mirror42 offers enterprise software products for operational IT Governance.

Becoming a Best-Run Midsize Company:

Session 102: Benchmark Your Way to World-Class Performance! Jeff Rumburg, Managing Partner, MetricNet, LLC

Getting the right robots Getting robots right

Banking IT Modernization and the Adoption of Hybrid Cloud

The 2014 Guide to SAP Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) Solutions: An excerpt. David Williams SAP

Features and Capabilities. Assess.

NETSUITE USER GROUP WEBCAST

Aligning and rationalizing your business applications. How to simplify the IT portfolio and reduce costs in financial services

IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN IT STRATEGY

Effective Project Control using an Automated Gated Process Workflow and Project Scalability

Agenda. Project Approach. Executive Summary Internal Interviews. Internal Interviews

AMGA 2016 Medical Group Operations and Finance Survey

IDC FutureScape: Worldwide Manufacturing 2018 Predictions

The SafetyNet Process

Sage X3 Data Management and Analytics for Sage X3 People

The new focus for the digital CFO

Unleashing the Enormous Power of Call Center KPI s. Call Center Best Practices Series

Human Capital Management: Manage Employee Information

Challenges in Building Productivity Baseline by Lakshmi Menon & Swaminathan Subraman

Financial Management: Sales and Marketing

STAFF TIMESHEET INSTRUCTIONS

10 Steps KPI System Template Checklist

SAP Enterprise Performance Management Practice. December 2017

Legal ABRIDGED CONTENT. Purchase to View Full Benchmarking Report! The OpsDog Legal Benchmarking Report

Service Management Evolution

Halifax International Airport Authority

Accelerating your business transformation

Call Center Benchmark

Call Center Industry Benchmark

Workforce Optimization Trends

New Mexico. Content CAREER READINESS. Standards. and. Benchmarks GRADES K-8

Measure to Manage: Using Metrics to Achieve Best-in-Class Performance

Keeping Partners Informed with Key Performance Indicators

Empowering Collaborative Energy Management

HOW DATA-DRIVEN PERFORMANCE MONITORING SUPPORTS IT CAPACITY MANAGEMENT

Delivering Governed Self-Service BI across the Enterprise

Strategic Management Guide

P R O J E C T. Gerry Mooney. Presentation to. Head of Safety & Organisational Change ESB Networks Ltd

Financial Advisor Topical Research Series

What you gain The PwC Internal Audit Contacts David Toh Francis Wan

DRIVING EFFICIENCY AND SIMPLIFICATION IN TELENOR

Transcription:

ABOUT APQC's OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING MEASURE LIST The APQC Open Standards Benchmarking measure list concisely lists all of the measures currently available for a specific survey. These measures are organized by research area (A), the survey name (B), and finally by category of measure (C). The list identifies each measure's "metric group ID" number (D), the measure name (E), the formula in english as APQC computes it(f), the formula in question numbers specific to this survey (G), and whether or not the measure is a key performance indicator for its associated process (H). For more information about APQC's Open Standards Benchmarking, please contact us directly on +1-713-681-4020 or visit the APQC Open Standards Benchmarking website on www.apqc.org/osb. Page 1

ID # NAME FORMULA KPI KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT COST EFFECTIVENESS (12 MEASURES) 106104 Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for the business entity's knowledge management program per management program, initiative, or service / (Total business entity revenue * 106337 Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for the business entity's knowledge management program per business entity employee 106110 Costs for KM meetings, events, marketing, and training per $1,000 revenue 294.0360 / (294.0070 * management program, initiative, or service / Number of business entity employees 294.0360 / 294.0080 Costs for KM program meetings, events, marketing, and training / (Total business entity revenue * 106108 External/outsourcing costs directly associated with leading, managing, and supporting the KM program, initiative, or service per 294.0450 / (294.0070 * External/outsourcing costs directly associated with KM program / (Total business entity revenue * 106113 Funding for KM program, initiative, or service from allocations from business units, functions, or groups leveraging KM services per 106112 Funding for KM program, initiative, or service from central/enterprise funding source per 106114 Funding for KM program, initiative, or service from sources other than central/enterprise funding source or allocations from business units, functions, or groups leveraging KM services per $1,000 revenue 294.0430 / (294.0070 * (Percentage of total funding for KM program, initiative, or service from allocations from business units, functions, or groups leveraging KM services * management program, initiative, or service *.01) / (Total business entity revenue * (294.0380 * 294.0360 *.01) / (294.0070 * (Percentage of total funding for KM program, initiative, or service from central/enterprise funding source * Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for knowledge management program, initiative, or service *.01) / (Total business entity revenue * (294.0370 * 294.0360 *.01) / (294.0070 * (Percentage of total funding for KM program, initiative, or service from sources other than central/enterprise funding source or allocations from business units, functions, or groups leveraging KM services * Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for knowledge management program, initiative, or service *.01) / (Total business entity revenue * (294.0390 * 294.0360 *.01) / (294.0070 * Page 2

COST EFFECTIVENESS (12 MEASURES) 106111 KM costs other than personnel for staff and contractor personnel, outsourcing, systems, meetings, events, marketing, and training per 106107 Personnel (contractor) costs directly associated with leading, managing, and supporting the KM program, initiative, or service per KM program costs other than personnel for staff and contractor, outsourcing, systems, meetings, events, marketing, and training / (Total business entity revenue * 294.0460 / (294.0070 * Personnel (contractor) costs directly associated with KM program / (Total business entity revenue * 106106 Personnel (staff) costs directly associated with leading, managing, and supporting the KM program, initiative, or service per $1,000 revenue 106109 Systems costs for KM applications, platforms, and related technology per 106092 Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for the business entity's knowledge management program per FTE that directly supports it PROCESS EFFICIENCY (8 MEASURES) 106116 Estimated business value generated by KM program, initiative, or service per 106335 Estimated business value generated by KM program, initiative, or service per FTE that directly supports the business entity's knowledge management program 106115 Number of business entity employees that participate in approaches and activities included in KM program, initiative, or service per $1 billion revenue 106105 Number of FTEs that directly support business entity's knowledge management program per $1 billion revenue 294.0420 / (294.0070 * Personnel (staff) costs directly associated with KM program / (Total business entity revenue * 294.0410 / (294.0070 * Systems costs for KM program applications, platforms, and related technology / (Total business entity revenue * 294.0440 / (294.0070 * management program, initiative, or service / Number of FTEs that directly support the knowledge management program, initiative, or service 294.0360 / 294.0160 Estimated business value generated by KM program, initiative, or service / (Total business entity revenue * 294.0550 / (294.0070 * Estimated business value generated by KM program, initiative, or service / Number of FTEs that directly support the knowledge management program, initiative, or service 294.0550 / 294.0160 Number of employees that participate in approaches and activities included in KM program, initiative, or service / (Total business entity revenue * 0.000000001) 294.0470 / (294.0070 * 0.000000001) Number of FTEs that directly support the knowledge management program, initiative, or service / (Total business entity revenue * 0.000000001) 294.0160 / (294.0070 * 0.000000001) Page 3

PROCESS EFFICIENCY (8 MEASURES) 106102 Percentage of business entity employees that participate in approaches and activities included in KM program, initiative, or service (Number of employees that participate in approaches and activities included in KM program, initiative, or service / Number of business entity employees) * 100 106103 Ratio of estimated business value generated by KM program, initiative, or service to cost for knowledge management program, initiative, or service 106086 Percentage of KM applications, platforms, or technologies hosted in the cloud 106087 Percentage of KM applications, platforms, or technologies hosted on-premises STAFF PRODUCTIVITY (2 MEASURES) 106336 Number of business entity employees per FTE that directly supports the business entity's knowledge management program 106117 Percentage of business entity FTEs that directly support business entity's knowledge management program SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (13 MEASURES) 106091 platforms, or technologies from another source or group 106090 platforms, or technologies from one or more business units/functions whose employees are end-users of the application/platform 106089 platforms, or technologies from the IT group/function (294.0470 / 294.0080) * 100 (Estimated business value generated by KM program, initiative, or service / Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for knowledge management program, initiative, or (294.0550 / 294.0360) * 100 Percentage of KM applications, platforms, or technologies hosted in the cloud 294.0290 Percentage of KM applications, platforms, or technologies hosted on-premises 294.0300 Number of business entity employees / Number of FTEs that directly support the knowledge management program, initiative, or service 294.0080 / 294.0160 (Number of FTEs that directly support the knowledge management program, initiative, or service / Number of business entity FTEs) * 100 (294.0160 / 294.0090) * 100 platforms, or technologies from another source or group 294.0340 platforms, or technologies from one or more business units/functions whose employees are endusers of the application/platform 294.0330 platforms, or technologies from the IT group/function 294.0320 Page 4

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (13 MEASURES) 106088 platforms, or technologies from the KM program, initiative, or service platforms, or technologies from the KM program, initiative, or service 106098 Percentage of total cost for knowledge management program, initiative, or service allocated to external/outsourcing costs directly associated with KM 106100 Percentage of total cost for knowledge management program, initiative, or service allocated to KM meetings, events, marketing, and training 106101 Percentage of total cost for knowledge management program, initiative, or service allocated to other KM costs 106097 Percentage of total cost for knowledge management program, initiative, or service allocated to personnel (contractor) costs directly associated with KM 106096 Percentage of total cost for knowledge management program, initiative, or service allocated to personnel (staff) costs directly associated with KM 106099 Percentage of total cost for knowledge management program, initiative, or service allocated to systems costs for KM applications, platforms, and related technology 294.0310 (External/outsourcing costs directly associated with KM program / Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for knowledge management program, initiative, or (294.0430 / 294.0360) * 100 (Costs for KM program meetings, events, marketing, and training / Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for knowledge management program, initiative, or (294.0450 / 294.0360) * 100 (KM program costs other than personnel for staff and contractor, outsourcing, systems, meetings, events, marketing, and training / Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for knowledge management program, initiative, or (294.0460 / 294.0360) * 100 (Personnel (contractor) costs directly associated with KM program / Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for knowledge management program, initiative, or (294.0420 / 294.0360) * 100 (Personnel (staff) costs directly associated with KM program / Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for knowledge management program, initiative, or (294.0410 / 294.0360) * 100 (Systems costs for KM program applications, platforms, and related technology / Total cost, excluding overhead cost, for knowledge management program, initiative, or (294.0440 / 294.0360) * 100 106094 Percentage of total funding for KM program, initiative, or service Percentage of total funding for KM program, from allocations from business units, functions, or groups leveraging initiative, or service from allocations from business KM services units, functions, or groups leveraging KM services 294.0380 Page 5

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (13 MEASURES) 106093 Percentage of total funding for KM program, initiative, or service from central/enterprise funding source Percentage of total funding for KM program, initiative, or service from central/enterprise funding source 106095 Percentage of total funding for KM program, initiative, or service from sources other than central/enterprise funding source or allocations from business units, functions, or groups leveraging KM services 294.0370 Percentage of total funding for KM program, initiative, or service from sources other than central/enterprise funding source or allocations from business units, functions, or groups leveraging KM services 294.0390 About APQC's Open Standards Benchmarking APQC is the steward of the open standard benchmarking content. Content is developed and reviewed by various subject matter experts. Participation in APQC's Open Standards Benchmarking is complimentary for APQC Enterprise Members. APQC Functional Members can benchmark in their functional membership at no cost. By participating, you will receive a detailed table comparing your responses with those of your peers. In essence, you ll get a row-by-row comparison of your responses versus those of your peers. The data tables will feature your answers as well as indicate the high, median and low performance ranges. Past participants have used open standards benchmarking research reports to set baselines for process improvement projects, to build a business case for new initiatives, to prioritize high-impact opportunities, and even to validate success or return on investment from efforts. For more information, call +1-713-681-4020 or visit www.apqc.org/osb. Page 6