NUTRIENTS AND PARTICLES TAHOE.UCDAVIS.EDU 9

Similar documents
NUTRIENTS AND PARTICLES TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

nutrients and particles terc.ucdavis.edu 9

NUTRIENTS AND PARTICLES TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

BIOLOGY TAHOE.UCDAVIS.EDU

Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates P O Box 65; Turner, ME

clarity terc.ucdavis.edu 11

BIOLOGY TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

Interpreting Lake Data

Acidity and Alkalinity:

Arrow Lakes Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Program Measurements

By: Martin E. Lebo Charles R. Goldman. Ecological Research Associates. Davis, California Submitted to:

Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates P O Box 65; Turner, ME

Interpreting Lake Data

Fact Sheet. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality

Lake Tahoe Nearshore Evaluation and Monitoring Framework Report

CHAPTER FOUR AQUATIC RESOURCES, WATER QUALITY, AND LIMNOLOGY OF LAKE TAHOE AND ITS UPLAND WATERSHED

Comparative Study on Total Suspended Solids and Nutrients of the Las Vegas Wash Between the Demonstration Weir and its Terminus at the Las Vegas Bay

LAKE CLARITY CREDITING PROGRAM HANDBOOK

Nutrient and Sediment Transport in Streams of the Lake Tahoe Basin: A 30-Year Retrospective 1

Appendix B for Nearshore Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Page B-1

Phosphorus Goal Setting Process Questions and Answers 2010

Lake Washington. Water Quality Assessment Report. Copyright 2012 PLM Lake & Land Management Corp.

Lake Erie LaMP Nutrient Management Strategy Lake Erie Millennium Network April 27, 2010 Windsor, ON

RECENT RESEARCH UPDATES TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU 6

2012 Range Ponds Water Quality Report

Portage Lake CASS COUNTY

Effect of sediment and nutrient loading on Lake Tahoe optical conditions and restoration opportunities using a newly developed lake clarity model

Understanding Nutrients in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and Implications for Management and Restoration the EASTERN SHORE

U.S. Geological Survey s Update on the Water Quality of Delavan Lake

WETLAND RESTORATION: CAN IT IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF THE YAHARA LAKES?

o Incorporating climate change scenarios shifted model-generated activity locations slightly.

Ecosystems: Nutrient Cycles

Continuous records for the Chariton River indicate that 2004 was an average water year, with total flow approximately equal to the average annual

Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds Authority. Canyon Lake Phase 2 Water Quality Monitoring Plan

Status and Trends of Water Quality in Wisconsin s Lakes, Streams, and Rivers

CLMP+ Report on Fleming Lake (Aitkin County)

Dan Shaw and Tamara Sasaki- California State Parks Zach Hymanson- Alpine Solutions

SITES. Bull Shoals Lake. Seasonal Analysis

Stormwater Runoff Water Quality Characteristics From Highways in Lake Tahoe, California

Hydrology: Sources of Water and Nutrients

Monitoring Stormwater Best Management Practices: Why Is It Important and What To Monitor

CLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# CLMP+ Data Summary

Evaluation and Management of Non-Point Source Pollutants in the Lake Tahoe Watershed *

Sediment Trapping and Inflow/Outflow Phosphorus Turnover

CHAPTER 15 WATER POLLUTION. INTO THE GULF Researchers try to pin down what s choking the Gulf of Mexico

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

Aquatic Science Unit 2. Water Quality and Water Pollution

Hadlock Pond, Washington Co., Lake Hadlock Association, Inc.

Welcome. Thank you for joining us! Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization

Watershed Response to Water Storage. 8/1/2012 Paul Wymar Scientist Chippewa River Watershed Project

URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE IMPACTS ON SEATTLE AREA STREAM PHOSPHORUS TRANSPORT

Appendix A. General Concepts in Lake Water Quality. Black Dog WMO Watershed Management Plan P:\23\19\513\plan\Black Dog WMO adopted plan.

2016 Summit Lake Water Quality Report Prepared by Thurston County Environmental Health Division

Boy Lake CASS COUNTY

Report on the Health of Thompson Lake 2015

A Successful Lake Management Program for Lake Mitchell PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS SPECIALIZING IN WATER RESOURCES

WASA Quiz Review. Chapter 2

Water Quality Monitoring for Lake Erie and the Great Lakes Nutrient Initiative (GLNI)

Truckee River Watershed Council Annual Monitoring Data Report Submitted to Sierra Nevada Alliance Updated September 30, 2008

Analysis of Chlorophyll-a and other data collected in the Illinois River Watershed from

Today s Webinar: Types of Monitoring and Assessment Data and What They Mean

How may climate change affect shallow inland lakes of New York State? A simple question with a complex answer

Tahoe RSWMP Data Quality Objectives

Ecology and Animal Health

The Snapshot CONODOGUINET CREEK WATERSHED SNAPSHOT

July 2009 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING, ANALYSIS AND ANNUAL LOAD DETERMINATIONS FOR NUTRIENTS AND SOLIDS ON

The Impact of Large Storm Events on Nutrient Loadings in Texas Rivers

July 2009 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING, ANALYSIS AND ANNUAL LOAD DETERMINATIONS FOR THE ILLINOIS RIVER AT ARKANSAS HIGHWAY 59 BRIDGE, 2008

Wakefield Lake TMDL Public Meeting 3/17/2014. Jen Koehler, PE Barr Engineering

l ake Biology terc.ucdavis.edu

Gull Lake CASS & CROW WING COUNTIES

Monica Ozores-Hampton, Thomas Obreza, Mark Clark, Brian Boman, Tatiana Borisova, Matt Cohen, Michael Dukes, Tom Frazer, Ed Hanlon, Karl Havens, Chris

Water intake for hatchery on Chattahoochee River

Results from the 2017 Water Quality Monitoring Program

Eutrophication: Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek

How Ecosystems Work Section 2. Chapter 5 How Ecosystems Work Section 2: Cycling of Materials DAY 1

Particulate Soil Phosphorus and Eutrophication in Lakes and Streams

Lake Yale Hydrologic/Nutrient Budgets and Water Quality Management Plans

Subwatershed Prioritization of the Lake Wister Watershed Using Baseflow Water Quality Monitoring Data

Water Quality Response to the Angora Fire, Lake Tahoe, CA

PREDICTED EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL LOAD REDUCTIONS AND IN-LAKE TREATMENT ON WATER QUALITY IN CANYON LAKE A SUPPLEMENTAL SIMULATION STUDY

Managing Excessive Algal Caused Oxygen Demand in the San Joaquin River Deep Water Ship Channel 1

Protecting Utah s Water Resources. Nutrient Issues

Protecting Lake Erie By Managing Phosphorus: Lake Erie Binational Nutrient Management Strategy

Phosphorus in the. Minnesota River

Streamside Management. How the area around your pond effects the water.

What s In your Watershed Reeder Creek

TORCH LAKE TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

The Importance of Riparian Forests

Lake Whatcom Water Quality - Presentation to Bellingham City Council

Nutrient Cycling and Water Quality on California Rangelands

Wetland Design Manual. Supporting document: Wetland form and function

Potato Lake 2010 Project Results and APM Plan. Saturday May 28, 2011 Dave Blumer, Jake Macholl SEH Lake Scientists

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

Understanding Lake Data

Lake Tahoe Water Quality Investigations

8/11/2015 BY KOREE POMPEY

Water Quality Sampling Presentation Ministry of the Environment. Presented by Dana Cruikshank Surface Water Specialist October 2009

Sources for Bottom Water Phosphates and Suspended Sediments in Southern Cayuga Lake, New York

How Ecosystems Work Section 2

Transcription:

NUTRIENTS AND PARTICLES 9

Sources of clarity-reducing and blueness-reducing pollutants In 2017 Research has quantified the primary sources of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and particulate material that are causing Lake Tahoe to lose clarity and blueness in its upper waters. One of the major contributors to clarity decline are extremely fine particles in stormwater that originate from the urban watershed (67 percent), even though these areas cover only 10 percent of the basin s land area. Part of the atmospheric particle load is from these urbanized areas. For nitrogen, atmospheric deposition is the major source (57 percent). Phosphorus is primarily introduced by the urban (18 percent) and non-urban (47 percent) watersheds. These categories of pollutant sources form the basis of a strategy to restore Lake Tahoe s open-water clarity by agencies including the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, and the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. Data were originally generated for the Lake Tahoe TMDL Program. These results are revised from the original estimates as they are based on a longer time series of monitoring data. 9.1

Pollutant loads from seven watersheds In 2017 TAHOE: STATE OF THE LAKE REPORT 2018 The Lake Tahoe Interagency Monitoring Program (LTIMP) measures nutrient and sediment input from seven of the 63 watershed streams a reduction of three streams since 2011. The majority of stream phosphorus and nitrogen comes from the Upper Truckee River, Trout Creek, Blackwood Creek and Ward Creek (in that order). Suspended sediment came primarily from Ward Creek, Blackwood Creek, the Upper Truckee River, and Incline Creek (in that order). Trout Creek was markedly lower despite the high precipitation. The LTIMP stream water quality program is supported by the U.S. Geological Survey in Carson City, Nevada, UC Davis TERC, the California Tahoe Conservancy, the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. 9.2

Nitrogen contribution by Upper Truckee River Yearly since 1989 Nitrogen (N) is important because it, along with phosphorus (P), stimulates algal growth. The Upper Truckee River is the largest of the 63 streams that flow into Lake Tahoe, contributing about 25 percent of the inflowing water. The river s contribution of dissolved nitrate and the remainder of the total nitrogen load are shown here. The year-to-year variations primarily reflect changes in precipitation. 2017 saw the largest load of nitrogen ever recorded. This was due to the extraordinarily high flows following five years of drought. (One metric ton = 2,205 pounds.) 9.3

Phosphorus contribution by Upper Truckee River Yearly since 1989 Soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) is the fraction of phosphorus immediately available for algal growth. As with nitrogen (Page 9.3), the year-to-year variation in load largely reflects the changes in precipitation. The extremely high precipitation in 2017 resulted in a Total phosphorus level of 9.68 MT and an SRP load of 1.93 MT, both the highest values recorded. These compare with the long-term averages of 3.18 and 0.48 MT respectively. The long-term decrease in nutrient inputs is fundamental to restoring Lake Tahoe s ecosystem health. Total phosphorus is the sum of SRP and other phosphorus, which includes organic phosphorus and phosphorus associated with particles. (One metric ton (MT) = 2,205 pounds.) 9.4

Suspended sediment contribution by Upper Truckee River Yearly since 1989 The load of suspended sediment delivered to the lake by the Upper Truckee River is related to landscape condition and erosion as well as to precipitation and stream flow. Inter-annual variation in sediment load over shorter time scales is more related to the latter. Plans to restore lake clarity emphasize reducing loads of very fine suspended sediment (less than 20 microns in diameter) from urbanized areas. Efforts to restore natural stream function and watershed condition focus on reducing loads of total sediment regardless of size, as well as restoration of habitat for plants and wildlife. In 2017, the suspended sediment load from the Upper Truckee River was 5,019 metric tons, the fourth highest load recorded. The load greater than the sum of all annual loads from the previous five years. The high loads were the result of the high precipitation ending a five-year drought. The average annual load is 2,046 metric tons. 9.5

Lake nitrate concentration Yearly since 1980 Since 1980, the volume-weighted annual average concentration of nitrate-nitrogen has gradually been increasing, ranging between 13 and 20 micrograms per liter. In 2017, the volume-weighted annual average concentration of nitrate-nitrogen was 19.8 micrograms per liter. This high value is in part due to the sixth successive year in which deep mixing did not take place, allowing for a continued buildup of nitrate in the deep water. The average annual concentration is 17.4 micrograms per liter. Water samples are taken at the MLTP (mid-lake) station at 13 depths from the surface to 450 meters. 9.6

Lake phosphorus concentration Yearly since 1980 Phosphorus naturally occurs in Tahoe Basin soils and enters the lake from soil disturbance and erosion. Total hydrolyzable phosphorus, or THP, is a measure of the fraction of phosphorus that algae can use to grow. It is similar to the SRP that is measured in the streams. Since 1980, THP has trended towards a decline, although in the last eight years the values have been increasing toward levels that were present in the 1980s. The high stream loads in 2017 contributed to this increasing trend. In 2017, the volume-weighted annual average concentration of THP was 3.15 micrograms per liter, the highest level since 1989. The average annual value is 2.57 micrograms per liter. Water samples are taken at the MLTP (mid-lake) station at 13 depths from the surface to 450 meters. 9.7

Nitrate distribution In 2017 Water samples are collected approximately every month (on dates indicated by the dashed lines) at 13 depths (indicated by the dots) at the middle of the lake and analyzed in the TERC laboratory for nutrient concentrations. Here the nitrate concentration is shown in the form of color contours. Most evident is the vertical distribution of nitrate. Concentrations below a depth of about 300 feet are generally high. The surface waters, where sunlight enables algae to take up nitrogen as they grow, usually have low concentrations of nitrate. Although most of the nitrate enters at the surface through atmospheric deposition, it is rapidly taken up by the algae and surface concentrations are generally low. As algae sink and decompose, the nitrate they consumed reappears deep in the lake. At these depths, there is insufficient light for algae to grow and to use these nutrients. Deep lake mixing will bring the deep nitrate back to the surface. 2017 was a year where mixing extended to 1,099 feet, just two-thirds of the full depth. Consequently, a substantial amount of nitrate remained trapped in the deepest water. The annual nitrate concentration at a depth of 1,485 feet was 35.7 micrograms per liter. μg 9.8

Orthophosphate distribution In 2017 TAHOE: STATE OF THE LAKE REPORT 2018 Water samples are collected approximately every month (on dates indicated by the dashed lines) at 13 depths (indicated by the dots) at the middle of the lake and analyzed in the TERC laboratory for nutrient concentrations. Here the total hydrolyzable phosphorus (THP) concentration (the fraction of phosphorus that can be readily used by algae) is shown in the form of color contours. Phosphorus mainly enters the lake in association with fine particles during runoff events. The high values near the surface between June and September, and then again in December correspond to the timing of inflows. The high concentrations of phosphorus deep in the lake during summer are the result of algae sinking and then decomposing. Eventually the THP attaches to particles and settles to the lake bottom. The annual THP concentration at a depth of 1,485 feet was 4.6 micrograms per liter. μg 9.9

Fine particle distribution In 2017 TAHOE: STATE OF THE LAKE REPORT 2018 Water samples are collected approximately monthly (on dates indicated by the dashed lines) at 13 depths (indicated by the dots) at the middle of the lake, and analyzed in the TERC laboratory for the concentration of fine particles in 15 different bin sizes. Here the distributions of the finest particles (in the range of 0.5 to 8 microns) are shown in the form of color contours. Clearly evident is that the highest concentrations of fine particles (red tones) are concentrated in the upper part of the lake. This high concentration band of particles persists through the end of the year, and at concentrations higher than previous years. The particle concentration is highest from September onwards, which coincides with the annual variation in Secchi depth in 2017. The fine particles gradually clump together (aggregate) which allows them to more rapidly settle to the lake sediments at the bottom. 9.10