LSMS Integrated Surveys on Agriculture United Republic of Tanzania: Median Farming Household. EPAR Request No. 167

Similar documents
LSMS INTEGRATED SURVEYS ON AGRICULTURE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA: PADDY APPENDIX

Tanzania National Panel Survey LSMS-ISA: Gender

Tanzania National Panel Survey LSMS-ISA: Legumes

Tanzania Comparison and Analysis LSMS and Farmer First Data

Tanzania National Panel Survey LSMS-ISA: Highlights

Tanzania National Panel Survey LSMS-ISA: Market Access

LSMS - Integrated Surveys on Agriculture, United Republic of Tanzania: Intercropping

Crop Planting at the Extensive and Intensive Margins: Evidence from Tanzania s National Panel Survey

Productivity Gains and Cropland Allocation at the Extensive and Intensive Margins: Maize Yields and Land Use Choices in Tanzania

Analysis of World Bank PAD Indicators For Water, Sanitation & Hygeine Projects

Gender and Agriculture: Building smarter policy. Markus Goldstein

Purpose. Introduction

On-farm and Off-farm Strategies for

Comparing Farmer Perceived Soil Quality And Measured Soil Quality In Tanzania: Do They Align?! Leigh Anderson! Mary Kay Gugerty! Allison Kelly!

Summary of Indicator Construction Decisions Set A

CROP-ENVIRONMENT SERIES

Feed Assessment Tool (FEAST) individual farmer interview questionnaire

Agriculture and Climate Change

Sustainable Agricultural Productivity Recommended Readings

Poverty Alleviation and strategy for Revitalizing Agriculture (SRA)

A Decade of Change in Texas Agriculture Highlights and Trends from the Census of Agriculture

It Increasing the Health and Nutritional Outcomes of Rwanda s One Cow per Poor Family from a Gender Perspective ion Lab for

Fertilizer Sector Improvement (FSI+) Crop Cut Survey Report

An Overview of Agriculture in the Rural Municipalities of the Lower Souris River Watershed. Dana Harper Jim Unterschultz Scott Jeffrey

Professor Leigh Anderson, PI and Lead Faculty Associate Professor Mary Kay Gugerty, Lead Faculty April 18, 2011

Second Interim Technical Report. Project Title: From Field to Fork: Nutrition and Food Security in Uplands of Vietnam and Thailand

Political Economy of Fertilizer Policy in Ghana

Annual Agricultural Surveys

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD. Sofia 1040, blvd. Hristo Botev 55 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN 2010

National Drought Management Authority

Adilabad District Profile:

Methodological Validation and Research on Root Crops Collaboration LSMS- Global Strategy Measuring Cassava Productivity in Zanzibar and Malawi

Executive Summary 2013 Agricultural Census Whole Kingdom

Living Standards Measurement Study- Integrated Surveys on Agriculture: Innovations Built on Tradition

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

GENDER ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURAL LABOR IN THE MID-HILLS OF NEPAL AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ADOPTION OF CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE

17 Commercialization of Rice and Nutrition: A Case from West Kenya

Custom Raising Dairy Heifers: Expectations and Perspectives of Wisconsin Dairy Producers

GUIDE TO ASSEMBLING DATA FOR COW-CALF

56% 64% of farms are owned by the same family for 3 generations

Washington County Agriculture Profile

Living Standards Measurement Study Integrated Surveys on Agriculture: Main Features, Challenges and Next Steps

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

Global Perspectives on Agricultural Injury Prevention: Case Study China

Main Findings. Key Definitions RWANDA FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY MONITORING SYSTEM (FNSMS)

Ranch Calculator (RanchCalc)

Women s Small-scale Bean Seed Business in Antanetibe Mahazaza, Central Highlands of Madagascar. Bodo Rabary et al.

Good practices in agricultural adaptation: Findings from research in Maize, Sorghum and Cotton based farming systems in Zambia

QUESTIONNAIRE. Application of Chemical Fertilizer in Agriculture a study with special reference to the farmers in Andhra Pradesh, India.

5.2.1 Forage Production and Feeding Situation Types of forages used

An Analysis of the Food Security Situation in Selected Areas across Kokang

Cow-Calf Enterprise Standardized Performance Analysis

Special Seminar on Food Security: Focusing on Water management and Sustainable Agriculture

2007 PLANNING BUDGETS FOR DAIRY PRODUCTION IN MISSISSIPPI COSTS AND RETURNS. 112 and 250 COW DAIRY ENTERPRISES LARGE BREED CATTLE MISSISSIPPI, 2007

2016 Annual Impact: Country Report. April 2017 M&E Report

Livestock and livelihoods spotlight NIGERIA

Gender and sweetpotato production in Nigeria

APPENDIX A: INTERVIEW DATA FOR AGROPASTORALISTS FROM NORTHEASTERN BOTSWANA

Why Did Some Beef Cow Producers Weather The Last Five, Tough Years In Good Shape, While Others Suffered Severely?

Iowa Farm Outlook. December 2015 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Replacement Quality Heifer Prices Supported by Latest Data

SMALL FAMILY FARMS DATA PORTRAIT BASIC INFORMATION DOCUMENT. Methodology and data description

The spatial and agricultural basis of crop raiding by the Vulnerable common hippopotamus Hippopotamus amphibius around Ruaha National Park, Tanzania

Are contract farming schemes a solution to improving maize productivity and profitability?

El Salvador P4P Country Programme Profile

Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting

Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy

Agriculture in Hungary, 2010 (Agricultural census) Preliminary data (1) (Based on processing 12.5% of questionnaires.)

Acute food security outcomes are likely to improve with prospects of an average 2018/19 harvest

Kenya County Climate Risk Profile Annex: Kwale County

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): AGRICULTURE, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 1

The role of livestock in poverty reduction Challenges in collecting livestock data in the context of living standard household surveys in Africa

East African PLEC General Meeting Arusha, Tanzania, 26-28, November, Household Diversity in the Smallholder farms of Nduuri, Embu, Kenya.

Agricultural Development. Dana Boggess Program Officer, Agricultural Development December 18, 2012

Introduction to 2012 Census of Agriculture Data for Oklahoma

Use of Cows for Draft Work

Rise of Medium-Scale Farms in Africa: Causes and Consequences of Changing Farm Size Distributions

Iowa Farm Outlook. Department of Economics August, 2012 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Comings and Goings. Cattle Market Situation and Outlook

WP5. Measuring and mitigating the risk of mycotoxins in maize and dairy products for poor consumers in Kenya

From Aspiration to Transformation: Myanmar Agriculture and the Rural Economy

Enterprise Diversification: Will It Reduce Your Risk?

2012 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms Case Studies of Texas High. Plains Agriculture

EPDs and Reasonable Expectations in Commercial Crossbred Operations

Iowa Farm Outlook. February 2016 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Cattle Inventory Report Affirms What Happened in 2015 and What May Happen in 2016

Agricultural Land Valuation

Agricultural Risks Management in Africa A Synthesis

BEST PRACTICE PUBLICATION

D. Abate 1, B. Tassew 1, A. Zeleke 1, A. Kedu 1 and J. Wamatu 2. International Center for Research in Dry Areas

Presented by Ncera Farms CEO Mr M. Titimani

What is SHEP/SHEP UP? NEPAD/CAADP Seminar in Japan September 16, 2014

Long Calving Seasons. Problems and Solutions

Jacob Ricker-Gilbert Ϯ, Charles Jumbe, Joseph Kanyamuka, Jordan Chamberlin, Rodney Lunduka, and Stevier Kaiyatsa

Practices to Improve Beef Cattle Efficiency

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

FOCUS ON ENTERPRISE FOR PETER MASSAWE, POTATOES HAVE PROVEN TO BE THE ANSWER TO HIS FAMILY S WORRIES.

3.3 Denmark (Mette Vaarst, Anne Braad Kudahl)

Gayatri Datar (World Bank, IEG) Ximena V. Del Carpio (World Bank, IEG) Vivian Hoffmann (University of Maryland, AREC)

2O16 MISSISSIPPI. agriculture, forestry and natural resources

Dumangas, Iloilo, Philippines

How to Complete the Grazing Manure Calculator Worksheet

Transcription:

LSMS Integrated Surveys on Agriculture United Republic of Tanzania: Median Farming Household EPAR Request No. 167 Karina Derksen-Schrock, Kristen Holway, Amy Pennington, Travis Reynolds, C. Leigh Anderson, & Mary Kay Gugerty Prepared for Agricultural Policy Team Evans School Policy Analysis and Research (EPAR) of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Professor Leigh Anderson, PI and Lead Faculty Associate Professor Mary Kay Gugerty, Lead Faculty September 3, 211 SECTION B: Profile of the Median Farming Household Table of Contents Section Highlights... 2 Median Household and Median Farming Household by Gender... 3 Median Farming Household by Administrative Zone... 4 Tables Table 1: Median Household Profile... 3 Table 2: Median Farming Household Profile... 3 Table 3: Proportion of Farming Households by Administrative Zone... 5 Figures Figure 1: Median Household Landholding Size (acres)... 4 Figure 2: Median Number of Crops Grown per Household... 4 Figure 3: Median Maize Yield (kg/acre) - Long Rainy Season... 6 Figure 4: Median Paddy Yield (kg/acre) - Long Rainy Season... 6 Figure 5: Median Cassava Yield (kg/acre) - Permanent Crop... 7 Figure 6: Median Area Harvested by Major Crop (acres)... 7 Figure 7: Median Number of Cattle Owned... 8 Figure 8: Median Organic Fertilizer Application (kg/acre) - Long Rainy Season... 8 Figure 9: Median Value of Food Consumed in One Week (US Dollars)... 9 Evans School Policy Analysis & Research (EPAR) 1

Section Highlights In this section we present a brief profile of the median farmer in Tanzania, defining median along a number of household and farm characteristics. The median farmer falls in the middle of the distribution for the given characteristic, meaning half the farmers, plots, or farm households fall above this hypothetical person or farm and half below. The median agricultural household in Tanzania: Has five members, two of whom are under 12. Nearly half (44%) of those under five show signs of stunting. Is male-headed and cultivates four crops on two plots on a landholding of four acres. Is likely to grow maize, with a yield of 27 kg/acre (288 kg/acre for male-headed households and 24 kg/acre for female-headed households). Among zones: Median landholding is highest in zone. Households in the zone cultivate the largest number of crops. Highland farmers have the highest maize and paddy yields. farmers have the highest cassava yield. Among cattle-owning households, herd size is the largest in the zone. Of farming households that apply organic fertilizer, the highest rate of application is in the zone. Most of the information presented in this section appears elsewhere in the report. It is gathered here to offer a quick snapshot of a typical farming household and to offer median values, which are often more representative of the population than the commonly reported means. In addition to this Median Farmer brief based solely on LSMS-ISA data, EPAR is preparing Farmer Profile briefs that give more detail on farm management practices. These profiles are based on field interviews conducted in Tanzania across several farming systems: the (Brief #172), Coastal Cassava Regions (Brief #173), and Mixed Maize (Brief #174). Evans School Policy Analysis & Research (EPAR) 2

Median Household and Median Farming Household by Gender Table 1 Median Household Profile (all Tanzania) Agricultural household (n=2474) Proportion female-headed 25% 29% Number of family members 5 4 Number of children 12 and under 2 1 Value of food consumed (one week) $21.61 $22.13 Proportion of children five and under stunting (low height for age) Proportion of children five and under underweight (low weight for age) Proportion of children five and under wasting (low weight for height) Non-Agricultural household (n=791) 44% 33% 17% 11% 3% 3% Table 2 provides characteristics of the median male-headed farming household and the median female-headed farming household. Proportions of households cultivating certain crops and owning certain livestock are provided, followed by the median yields and number of livestock owned for those households that cultivate the crop or own the livestock. Table 2 Median Farming Household Profile (Tanzania farming households only) Male-headed (n=1878)* Female-headed (n=596)* Median number of plots 2 1 Median total landholding size (acres) 4 2 Median number of crops cultivated by household 4 4 that cultivate maize 82% 83% Median harvested area maize yield (long rainy season) 288 kg/acre 24 kg/acre Median area harvested with maize (long rainy season) 1.5 acres 1 acre that cultivate rice 18% 15% Median harvested area paddy yield (long rainy season) 45 kg/acre 42 kg/acre Median area harvested with paddy (long rainy season) 1 acre.7 acres that cultivate cassava 36% 3% Median harvested area cassava yield (permanent crop) 17 kg/acre 16 kg/acre Median area harvested with cassava (permanent crop) 2 acres 1 acre owning cattle 25% 14% Median number of cattle owned 5 6 Median number of chickens owned 1 6 that apply organic fertilizer 24% 16% that apply inorganic fertilizer 14% 11% Median organic fertilizer applied per acre (long rainy 1 kg/acre 125 kg/acre season) Value of food consumed (one week) $22.81 $17.98 Proportion of under-5-year-olds suffering from stunting 42% 46% *Number of observations varies for each question depending on whether or not there is missing data, but this is the overall number of male-headed and female-headed agricultural households. Evans School Policy Analysis & Research (EPAR) 3

Median Farming Household by Administrative Zone The median farming household across all eight administrative zones in Tanzania farmed a median of two plots. However, the median landholding size for those households that owned or cultivated at least one plot varies across zones, as shown in Figure 1. Median landholding size was highest in the zone and lowest in. Figure 1: Median Household Landholding Size (acres) 4.5 4. 3.5 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5. (n=136) (n=195) (n=343) (n=246) (n=34) (n=456) (n=32) (n=262) Figure 2 shows the median number of crops grown per household, of households that owned or cultivated at least one plot, including crops grown in the short and long rainy seasons, and permanent and fruit crops. Figure 2: Median Number of Crops Grown per Household 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 (n=136) (n=195) (n=343) (n=246) (n=34) (n=456) (n=32) (n=262) Evans School Policy Analysis & Research (EPAR) 4

Table 3 shows the proportion of households within each zone that grow maize, paddy, and cassava. The table also shows the proportion of households in each zone that own cattle and the proportion of households that apply organic and inorganic fertilizer. Table 3 Proportions of Farming Households by Administrative Zone that cultivate maize 79% 69% 93% 8% 88% 74% 95% 6% that cultivate paddy that cultivate cassava owning cattle that apply organic fertilizer that apply inorganic fertilizer 8% 38% 9% 19% 5% 27% 18% 51% 2% 27% 12% 69% 2% 57% 41% 82% 21% 2% 23% 19% 47% 3% 28% 25% 33% 5% 24% 22% 34% 8% 22% 11% 6% 5% 34% 1% 15% 18% 7% 8% Evans School Policy Analysis & Research (EPAR) 5

Figure 3 shows the median maize yield for households within each zone that reported growing maize. The highest median reported was in the, 396kg/acre, which also had one of the highest proportions of households growing maize, 93%, as shown in Table 3. Figure 3: Median Maize Yield (kg/acre) - Long Rainy Season 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 (n=16) (n=96) (n=294) (n=85) (n=221) (n=33) (n=177) * was removed due to low number of observations (less than 3). Note: Yields calculated using area harvested. Similarly, Figure 4 shows the median paddy yield for households in each zone that reported growing paddy. had the highest median paddy yield, at 75 kg/acre. However, the had one of the lowest proportions of households that grow paddy (9%). With the exception of the and zones, all other zones had a higher proportion of households cultivating paddy (Table 3). Figure 4: Median Paddy Yield (kg/acre) - Long Rainy Season 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 (n=54) (n=31) (n=11) (n=44) (n=126) *,, and zones were removed due to low number of observations (less than 3). Note: Yields calculated using area harvested. Evans School Policy Analysis & Research (EPAR) 6

As shown in Table 3, had the highest proportion of households cultivating cassava (82%), followed by the zone (69%). also reported the highest median cassava yield, while the zone reported the lowest (Figure 5). Figure 5: Median Cassava Yield (kg/acre) - Permanent Crop 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 (n=42) (n=14) (n=42) (n=197) (n=74) (n=4) * and zones were removed due to low number of observations (less than 3). Note: Yields calculated using area harvested. Note: There were a total of 529 observations of cassava as a permanent crop at the household level (captured in the graph above). However, there were an additional 156 observations that were incorrectly coded as long rainy season crops, and are therefore unaccounted for in the graph above. Figure 6 shows the median area harvested for maize, paddy, and cassava. zone had the highest median area harvested for maize and paddy, but zone had the highest area harvested for cassava. Figure 6: Median Area Harvested by Major Crop (acres) 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 Maize Paddy Cassava *Insufficient observations (less than 3) for zone paddy and cassava, zone cassava, zone paddy, zone paddy, and maize. Note: Maize and paddy area harvested during the long rainy season; cassava area harvested as permanent crop. Evans School Policy Analysis & Research (EPAR) 7

Table 3 shows the zone had the highest proportion of households owning cattle (47%), but households that owned cattle owned a median of four cattle. However, in the zone, where only 19% of households owned any cattle, those that did own cattle owned a median of nine cattle. Figure 7: Median Number of Cattle Owned 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 (n=3) (n=78) (n=47) (n=177) (n=93) (n=69) * and zones were removed due to low number of observations (less than 3). Note: The cattle category includes bulls, cows, steers, heifers, male calves, and female calves. Figure 8 shows the median amount (kilograms) of organic fertilizer applied per acre during the long rainy season, for those households that applied any organic fertilizer to one or more plots. zone had the highest proportion of users, 34% (Table 3), and the highest application rate, shown below. Figure 8: Median Organic Fertilizer Application (kg/acre) - Long Rainy Season 3 25 2 15 1 5 N=44 N=76 N=37 N=92 N=32 N=37 * zone and were removed due to low number of observations (less than 3). Evans School Policy Analysis & Research (EPAR) 8

Figure 9 shows the median value of food consumed in one week by agricultural households in each of the eight administrative zones. Agricultural households in the zone consume the most, $25. in one week, while agricultural households in the zone consume the least, $17.66 in one week. Figure 9: Median Value of Food Consumed in One Week (US Dollars) $3 $25 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ (n=136) (n=37) (n=348) (n=253) (n=367) (n=459) (n=323) (n=281) Evans School Policy Analysis & Research (EPAR) 9