SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 008 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

Similar documents
SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 155 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #172 Entry Year: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 3032 County: Iron

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 146 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 020 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 40 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acres 2327 County: Menominee

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 277 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 19 ENTRY YEAR: Compartment Acreage: 1330 County: Marquette

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT # 9 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: 1775 GIS acres County: Marquette

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 9 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 85 ENTRY YEAR: Compartment Acreage: 1927 County: Schoolcraft

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #17 ENTRY YEAR: 2001

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 194 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 40 ENTRY YEAR: 2009

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 129 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 49 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 37 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 137. ENTRY YEAR: 2008 Compartment Acreage: 3,655 County: Cheboygan

Gwinn Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment 211 Entry Year: 2009 Compartment Acreage: 584 County: Marquette

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 148. ENTRY YEAR: 2009 Compartment Acreage: 1,571 County: CHEBOYGAN

SAULT FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 51 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 18 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 134 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #50 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 135 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

CRYSTAL FALLS FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT #73 - ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: County: Dickinson

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 4. ENTRY YEAR: 2007 Compartment Acreage: 1,348 County: OTSEGO

Today, jack pine dominates the western ½ of the compartment while aspen is somewhat more prevalent in the eastern ½.

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #187 County Year: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 600 County: Iron

SAULT FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 19 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 014 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 202 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #33 ENTRY YEAR: 2002

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 153. ENTRY YEAR: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 1,387 County: Cheboygan

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 48 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 58 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 152 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 122 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Draft Revision Date: April 28, 2008, Aug. 2008, 10/20/08

Gwinn FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT #227 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: 1564 County: Marquette

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 55 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 19 ENTRY YEAR: 2013

Compartment Review Presentation

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 137 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 113 ENTRY YEAR: Compartment Acreage: 2772

Compartment Review Presentation

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 21 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 157 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #76 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 1212 County: Dickinson

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

Watershed and Fisheries Considerations: Lyons lake to the NE with no real access and Whiskey Creek which runs through the compartment.

Gwinn Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment 104 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 1,291 County: Alger

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 43. ENTRY YEAR: 2009 Compartment Acreage: 3,343 County: CHARLEVOIX

NEWBERRY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 63 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

BARAGA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #28 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

SAULT FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 18 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 246 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #193 Entry Year: 2012 Compartment Acreage: 1258 County: Iron

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT # 57 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: 1686 County: Menominee

Sault Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment # 49 Entry Year: 2013 Compartment Acreage: 1,929 County: Chippewa

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 247 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

Baraga Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #32 Entry Year: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 1985 County: Houghton

NEWBERRY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 60 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 186 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

SAULT FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 112 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #61 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

Newberry Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #42070 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 2,860 County: Chippewa

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 116 ENTRY YEAR: 2012

Compartment Review Presentation

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 120 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

Baraga Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #11 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 3353 County: Baraga

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #101 Entry Year: 2012 Compartment Acreage: 1248 County: Dickinson

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #22 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Shingleton Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #174 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 1418 County: Alger

Compartment Review Presentation

Report 1 Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Sault Ste Marie Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment # 54 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 1,210 County: Chippewa

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 190. ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: 2,401 County: Cheboygan

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

COMPARTMENT PRESENTATION

Compartment Review Presentation

Shingleton Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #54 Entry Year: 2012 Compartment Acreage: 1,983 County: Schoolcraft

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

NEWBERRY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 51 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Revision Date: 6/20/2011. Stand Examiner: Linda Lindberg. Legal Description: T45N, R31W, Sections 27, 28, 32 and 34. RMU (if applicable):

Sault Ste Marie Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #124 Entry Year: 2013 Compartment Acreage: 1,908 County: Mackinac

Shingleton Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #136 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 2462 County: Alger

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

NEWBERRY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 130 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Transcription:

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 008 ENTRY YEAR: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 1356 County: SCHOOLCRAFT Revision Date: 10/21/09 Stand Examiner: R. Tylka Legal Description: T44N R13W Sections 16-21, 30 RMU (if applicable): Management Goals: Timber and wildlife management opportunities are the primary focus on state lands in this compartment, with additional emphasis on recreation. Soil and Topography: Flat to rolling terrain generally featuring sandy soils on the uplands and heavier soils in the bottomlands. Drainage is frequently impeded on the lowland sites. Ownership Patterns, Development, and Land Use in and Around the Compartment: The state owned lands in sections 16-21 consist of several oddly-sized blocks of land mixed in with private ownership, including parcels featuring a number of permanent homes and hunting camps. Section 30 is wholly state-owned and features the Mead Creek State Forest Campground at the confluence of Mead Creek and the Manistique River. This compartment is just east of and immediately adjacent to the Seney National Wildlife Refuge. Unique, Natural Features (include only non-site specific and non-sensitive information): Currently under review by Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI). Archeological, Historical, and Cultural Features (include only non-site specific and non-sensitive information): None known. Special Management Designations or Considerations: Watershed and Fisheries Considerations: The Manistique River is classified as non-trout water. The fisheries community consists of walleye, smallmouth bass, northern pike, sunfish, yellow perch, sucker spp., and minnow spp. Mead Creek is also non-trout water and supports in the lower reaches a similar fish community like that found in the Manistique River. BMP s should be implemented to control sediment sources from adjacent uplands. Fine sediments such as silt and sand negatively affect natural reproduction of fish, decrease the diversity of aquatic invertebrate and fish taxa, and result in lower overall fish populations. Wildlife Habitat Considerations: This compartment lies east of the Manistique River on the northern end of the River Road and contains a variety of forest types ranging from aspen and northern hardwoods to upland pines and lowland conifers. Mead Creek flows across the middle of this compartment.

Wildlife goals include maintaining species and structural diversity within the northern hardwood stands, promoting super-canopy trees near the Manistique River, maintaining hemlock where present, maintaining lowland cedar stands, and providing age and structural diversity between aspen stands. Mineral Resource and Development Concerns and/or Restrictions: Surface sediments consist of lacustrine (lake) sand & gravel and coarse-textured till. The glacial drift thickness varies between 50 and 100 feet. The Silurian Manitoulin Dolomite and Ordovician Big Hill Dolomite and Queenston Shale subcrop below the glacial drift. The Manitoulin and Big Hill could be used for stone. Gravel pits are located in the area and there should be potential on the uplands. There is no commercial oil and gas production in the UP. Vehicle Access: County Road P436 runs north south through the compartment, and numerous logging roads provide access to much of the state lands in this area. Some areas in the northeastern part of the compartment are only accessible across private lands. Survey Needs: Recreational Facilities and Opportunities: Mead Creek State Forest Campground is located in section 30, on the banks of the Manistique River. Fire Protection: Access across low, wet terrain may be problematic in some areas. Additional Compartment Information: The following 5 reports from the Operations Inventory System (OIPC) are attached: Cover Type by Age Class Cover Type by Management Objective Compartment Volume Summary Proposed Treatments No Limiting Factors Proposed Treatments With Limiting Factors The following information is displayed, where pertinent, on the attached compartment maps: Base feature information, stand numbers, cover types Proposed treatments Proposed road access system Suggested potential old growth

11/2/2009 11:15:24 AM Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Operations Inventory System Individual Compartment Report TABLE 3: Page 1 of 1 LAKE SUPERIOR STATE FOREST SHINGLETON FOREST MGT UNIT SCHOOLCRAFT COUNTY COMPARTMENT: 8 Table 3 (acres shown in boxes) STAND AGE CLASS COVER TYPE Not Coded 0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-99 100-109 110-119 120-129 130-139 140-149 150-159 All Aged Total 82 101 29 15 3 Aspen 230 28 Black Spruce 28 166 Bog or Marsh 166 Cedar 50 158 100 308 5 Grass 5 Jack Pine 9 18 50 40 117 49 Lowlnd Brush 49 51 Lowlnd Poplr 51 Mx Swmp Cnfr 4 1 22 27 15 Non Stocked 15 13 Paper Birch 13 Red Pine 15 5 147 167 Upland Hdwds 184 184 4 Water 4 Total 239 106 132 83 15 3 6 129 209 158 100 184 1356

11/2/2009 11:15:29 AM Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Operations Inventory System Individual Compartment Report TABLE 3A: Page 1 of 1 LAKE SUPERIOR STATE FOREST SHINGLETON FOREST MGT UNIT SCHOOLCRAFT COUNTY COMPARTMENT: 8 Table 3A (acres shown in boxes) MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE TYPE COVER TYPE A S V C G H J I L P N Q X O B R K Y F E T D U M Z W Total A Aspen 230 230 S Black Spruce 28 28 V Bog or Marsh 166 166 C Cedar 308 308 G Grass 5 5 J L P Q X B R M Z Jack Pine 117 117 Lowlnd Brush 12 37 49 Lowlnd Poplr 51 51 Mx Swmp Cnfr 27 27 Non Stocked 15 15 Paper Birch 13 13 Red Pine 167 167 Upland Hdwds 184 184 Water 4 4 Total 230 28 178 308 5 117 37 51 27 15 13 167 184 4 1356

11/2/2009 11:15:34 AM Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Operations Inventory System Individual Compartment Report TABLE 10: Page 1 of 1 LAKE SUPERIOR STATE FOREST SHINGLETON FOREST MGT UNIT SCHOOLCRAFT COUNTY COMPARTMENT: 8 Table 10 - COMPARTMENT VOLUME SUMMARY - ALL STANDS COMPARTMENT SUMMARY TOTAL VOLUME Hardwood 3981 Cds Hardwood 324 Mbf Softwood 6887 Cds Softwood 854 Mbf Sum TotVol 13224 Cds CUT VOLUME Hardwood 1051 Cds Hardwood 11 Mbf Softwood 1211 Cds Softwood 328 Mbf Sum CutVol 2940 Cds Total Cmpt Acres Acres Proposed For Cut... 237 1356

Stand SHINGLETON FOREST MGT UNIT Proposed Treatments Compartment: 8 With NO Limiting Factors Cover Type Acres Age Site Index Mgt Obj Condition Method Cut 4 19 55 northern hardwood unevenaged selection 3 Harvest Priority Cultural Need [8/20/03] Prepped for sale 41-009-02-01. Residual BA/acre: r.maple = 64, y.birch = 4, cedar = 2, b. fir = 1, w.spruce = 3 [02/07/06] Sale is now closed incomplete TCR dtd 02/02/06 - this stand was not cut. YOE 2011 - attempt to sell this stand along with stands 10, 11 & 12. 10 4 72 37 black spruce-swamp immature final harvest 3 Entry Year: 2011 FDF Status Cut along with stand 12 - reserve any hemlock encountered in the stand. Acceptable regeneration includes all conifers plus aspen & birch. 11 7 72 37 black spruce-swamp immature final harvest 3 Cut along with stand 12 - reserve any hemlock encountered in the stand. Acceptable regeneration includes all conifers plus aspen & birch. 12 P6 34 74 60 balsam poplar & mature final harvest 3 natural regeneration swamp aspen and swamp white birch Buffer the stream in the south end of the stand and stay away from the adjacent wet areas that may be inoperable; doing this will also provide for retention guidelines. Acceptable regeneration includes all species present. If any hemlock or white pine is encountered, reserve it. 33 A6 3 49 50 aspen (upland) mature final harvest 3 Ready to cut. 38 54 82 60 red pine mature shelterwood-seed 2 natural regeneration Ready for a seed-tree cut & prescribed fire to regenerate the stand. Retain the largest, healthiest pine as seed sources. Mixed softwood includes spruce & fir. Red pine regen is desirable/acceptable; if stocking of natural red pine regen is inadequate, plant more red pine before the benfit of burning is lost. 41 32 84 65 red pine mature shelterwood-seed 2 natural regeneration Ready for a seed-tree cut & prescribed fire to regenerate the stand. Retain the largest, healthiest pine as seed sources. Red pine regen is desirable/acceptable; if stocking of natural red pine regen is inadequate, plant more red pine before the benfit of burning is lost. 46 4 84 60 red pine mature seed tree 3 natural regeneration Ready for a seed-tree cut. Retain the healthiest trees to provide a seed source, and scarify for natural regeneration. Wld : Leave some deciduous trees in the stand if present for diversity. 49 6 84 40 jack pine immature final harvest 1 Wld : Slow-growing jack pine/spruce mix - harvest now or lose it. Retention guidelines will be met during sale preparation: jack pine and all other conifers are acceptable regeneration. Retention should include leaving trees along the west side of the stand next to the Q stand for a travel corridor, and scattered trees across the stand. 51 8 84 40 jack pine immature final harvest 1 Wld : Slow-growing jack pine/spruce mix - harvest now or lose it. Retention guidelines will be met during sale preparation: jack pine and all other conifers are acceptable regeneration. Retention should include leaving some trees on the north end of the stand between the adjacent Q stands, and leaving some scattered trees through the rest of the stand. 56 15 84 40 jack pine immature final harvest 1 Slow-growing jack pine/spruce mix - harvest now or lose it. Retention guidelines will be met during sale preparation: jack pine and all other conifers are acceptable regeneration. 57 24 84 65 red pine mature shelterwood-seed 2 natural regeneration Semi-open red pine thinned in 1996 - ready for a seed-tree cut & prescribed fire to regenerate the stand. Retain the largest, healthiest pine as seed sources. Red pine regen is desirable/acceptable; if stocking of natural red pine regen is inadequate, plant more red pine before the benfit of burning is lost. Retention guidelines will be met during sale prep. Wld : Leave deciduous trees if present for diveristy. Page 1 of 2 11/2/2009

Stand SHINGLETON FOREST MGT UNIT Proposed Treatments Compartment: 8 With NO Limiting Factors Cover Type Acres Age Site Index Mgt Obj Condition Method Cut Harvest Priority Cultural Need 58 13 84 65 red pine mature shelterwood-seed 2 natural regeneration Entry Year: 2011 FDF Status Thinned in 1996 - ready for a seed-tree cut & prescribed fire to regenerate the stand. Retain the largest, healthiest pine as seed sources. Red pine regen is desirable/acceptable; if stocking of natural red pine regen is inadequate, plant more red pine before the benfit of burning is lost. Retention guidelines will be met during sale prep. Wld : Leave deciduous trees if present for stand diversity. 59 4 50 northern hardwood unevenaged selection 3 Wld : Leave a component of beech if present. Leave one or more wolfy trees for diversity, and maintain species and structural diversity in the stand. 60 10 84 65 red pine mature seed tree 2 natural regeneration Thinned in 1996 - ready for a seed-tree cut & prescribed fire to regenerate the stand. Retain the largest, healthiest pine as seed sources. Red pine regen is desirable/acceptable; if stocking of natural red pine regen is inadequate, plant more red pine before the benfit of burning is lost. Retention guidelines will be met during sale prep. Wld : Leave deciduous trees if present for diveristy. Total Acres... 237 Page 2 of 2 11/2/2009

Proposed Treatments With Limiting Factors Compartment: 8 Entry Year: 2011 Stand Cover Type Acres Age Site Index Mgt Obj Condition Method Cut Harvest Priority Cultural Need FDF Status TREATMENT LIMITING FACTORS: Total Acres... 0 Page 1 of 1 11/2/2009

85 59 0"W Compartment 8 T44N, R13W, Sec. 16-21, 30 County: Schoolcraft Unit: Shingleton YOE: 2011 Acres: 1,356 GIS Calculated Stand Examiner: Robert Tylka Map Revised: 10/30/2009 Map Phase: Pre-Review 85 58 0"W Covertype & Treatment Map 85 57 0"W 18 17 19 20 30 16 21 46 13 0"N Legend Miris Corners Highways County Paved Roads Paved Roads Water Features Stand Boundaries 74 X0 21 20 R8 18 Q2 46 13 0"N 19 17 S4 401 46 12 0"N 22 23 16 15 R8 14 24 9 8 11 100 10 100 13 12 P6 141 7 P5 6 3 4 800 2 5 1 46 12 0"N Manistique River 73 X0 Riv ers ide 34 Tru ck Trl 403 33 A6 100 31 29 30 28 25 26 27 402 46 11 0"N 59 800 72 Z0 66 60 247 58 347 61 68 64 69 70 Mead Creek SFCG 65 Q6 57 347 53 67 55 56 100 63 R2 40 71 54 50 51 Q4 100 62 Q4 39 52 41 347 38 347 404 49 100 48 47 46 245 45 35 42 B3 36 43 44 37 A6 32 Q6 Legend Treatments 100 - Final harvest 141 - Final harvest/natural regeneration/hand tools 245 - Seed tree/natural regeneraion/mechanical 247 - Seed tree//natural regeneration/prescribed burning 347 - Shelterwood-seed/Natural regeneration/prescribed burning 800 - Selection A - Aspen B - Paper Birch C - Northern White Cedar G - Grass J - Jack Pine L - Lowland Brush M - Northern Hardwoods P - Balsam Poplar, Swamp Aspen, Swamp White Birch Q - Mixed Swamp Conifers R - Red Pine S - Black Spruce Swamp V - Bog or Muskeg X - Non-Stocked Z - Water Mead Creek Macaw 46 11 0"N 1 0.5 0 1 Miles 85 59 0"W 85 58 0"W 85 57 0"W

85 59 0"W 85 58 0"W Stand Boundary Map Compartment 8 T44N, R13W, Sec. 16-21, 30 County: Schoolcraft Unit: Shingleton YOE: 2011 Acres: 1,356 GIS Calculated Stand Examiner: Robert Tylka Map Revised: 10/30/2009 Map Phase: Pre-Review 18 17 16 19 20 21 20 R8 46 13 0"N 30 18 Q2 19 401 17 S4 21 16 13 3 14 11 9 46 12 0"N 23 8 ck Tr l ide Tru 30 ers Riv 26 27 59 57 60 56 43 Legend Miris Corners Highways County Paved Roads Paved Roads Water Features Stand Boundaries 41 48 52 51 50 Q4 53 Macawle 37 A6 404 42 B3 40 54 49 44 47 46 62 Q4 61 46 10 0"N 39 67 55 32 Q6 38 63 R2 65 Q6 58 402 46 11 0"N 46 11 0"N 68 66 64 6 31 36 35 69 7 P5 25 403 33 A6 72 Z0 10 29 73 X0 71 4 12 P6 22 5 46 12 0"N 15 R8 70 2 1 45 1 0.5 85 59 0"W 0 85 58 0"W 1 Miles 85 57 0"W 46 10 0"N 46 13 0"N 85 57 0"W

85 59 0"W 85 58 0"W 85 57 0"W Dedicated & Proposed Special Conservation Area Map 46 13 0"N Compartment 8 T44N, R13W, Sec. 16-21, 30 County: Schoolcraft Unit: Shingleton YOE: 2011 Acres: 1,356 GIS Calculated Stand Examiner: Robert Tylka Map Revised: 10/30/2009 Map Phase: Pre-review 18 19 30 17 20 16 21 46 13 0"N 20 R8 18 Q2 46 12 0"N 21 22 19 23 16 17 S4 15 R8 14 9 8 11 10 13 12 P6 7 P5 3 6 4 401 2 5 1 46 12 0"N 73 X0 Riv ers ide Tru ck Trl 403 33 A6 31 29 30 25 26 27 402 36 35 32 Q6 Macawley 46 11 0"N 72 Z0 66 59 58 68 64 69 57 60 53 67 65 Q6 70 63 R2 71 40 54 55 56 51 50 Q4 39 52 44 38 404 41 49 48 47 46 42 B3 43 37 A6 Legend Miris Corners Stand Boundaries Dedicated Special Conservation Areas Campgrounds Boat Access Sites 46 11 0"N 61 62 Q4 45 1 0.5 0 1Miles 85 59 0"W 85 58 0"W 85 57 0"W

Report Date: 10/30/2009 Shingleton Mgt. Unit Compartment: 008 DEDICATED CONSERVATION AREA DETAILS Page 1 of 1 * This is a list of Dedicated Biodiversity Areas for this compartment along with a 1/4 mile buffer surrounding the compartment. Refer to Dedicated Conservation Area Map for areas that the below listed Conservation Areas are located. Conservation Area Type Description ERA = Ecological Reference Area HCVA = High Conservation Value Area SCA = Special Conservation Area SCA SCA Archaeological Site Concentrated Recreation Area An aquatic or terrestrial area of the State that contains physical remains of human occupation. These are sites of cultural and historical significance that may occur upon terrestrial areas and Great Lakes bottomlands. They include thousands of Native American settlements and burial sites, as well as French and British outposts, nineteenth century logging camps, mines and homesteads. Beneath the waters of the Great Lakes, there are shipwrecks and other remains documenting the maritime trade. Such sites may be identified by Natural heritage data from the State Historic Preservation Office. Proposed treatments in this compartment will be implemented in such a manner as to maintain the integrity of these sites. Due to the sensitive nature of this information, no further detail about location is available. Facilities that are designed and maintained for routine or heavy recreational use, including State Parks, State Forest campgrounds, motorized and non-motorized trails, trailheads, staging areas and public access sites.