Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) to support development of the. Public Meetings. January 28, 29 and February 2, 2015

Similar documents
Steve Patrinick Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Dallas, TX Tim Crobons Connetics Transportation Group, Lake Mary, FL Andrew Ittigson AECOM, Dallas, TX

DART s Role in Transit - Oriented Development. Jack Wierzenski,, Director Economic Development & Planning Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA)

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: UPDATE REPORT AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AND TRANSIT FLEET ASSESSMENT

Adoption of New DART Service Standards

CIRCULATOR STATUS UPDATE PRESENTATION JUNE 22, 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ORGANIZATION OF REPORT

Introduction. McLennan County Transit Need Study

DRAFT PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT

Transit Effectiveness Project Policy Advisory Group February 1, 2006

Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG

Strategic Plan. SFMTA Board of Directors Workshop

COLLIN COUNTY TRANSIT NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING STUDY

Mobility 2025 Update: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan

11. MARKETING AND OUTREACH

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Marketing by Mode Express Bus Service. Doris Williams, Marketing and Communications, Broward County Transit

MOBILITY ON DEMAND - A HOLISTIC APPROACH. NCTCOG Mobility on Demand Working Group May 15, 2017

Status Report on the 3 Rail Priorities

Riverview Corridor Pre-Project Development Study

Transit Marketing Study

ARLINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

State-Mandated Performance Audit

The New SFMTA Strategic Plan

Muni Service Equity Strategy Policy. SFMTA Board of Directors May 6, 2014

MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Attachment 1. Task Order Services, Schedule and Deliverables

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2: Transit Survey Analysis

A Region of Incredible Opportunity.

APPENDIX C. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2: Transit Survey Analysis

DECEMBER P R O G R E S S R E P O R T

DART Briefing D2, Streetcar, Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) and Cotton Belt

TRANSIT SYSTEM SUMMARY REPORT

Asheville, North Carolina s Sustainable Operations Plan Going Green in the Blue Ridge Mountains

TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

NCTCOG TRANSIT NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING STUDY FINAL IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING PLAN FOR ROCKWALL COUNTY

Sustainability. Sustainability Principles. 1. Framework. Spokane Transit s definition of Sustainability is:

An Evidence-Based Approach for the Planning and Development of Transportation Investments

Using Technology to Expand Customer Mobility Options through Integrated Fare Payment at UTA: Technical and Organizational Considerations

NEW ORLEANS REGION TRANSIT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SCOPE OF SERVICES. RPC Project LA90X361

Coordinating Committee. November 18, 2014

Technical Briefing Report

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

Bus Rapid Transit Network Marketing Strategy

DC Circulator 2018 Service Changes. Outreach Results Report May 2018

APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY FEBRUARY 2017

LIFT Program - Overview

Safety and Operations Committee. Information Item IV-A. December 13, 2018

Strategic Plan PROPOSED STRATEGIC PLAN METRICS. Progress Report

Locally Preferred Alternative. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 1

FOCUS40 MassDOT Board Presentation March 13, 2017

Public Input CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP (CAG)

Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study

Transit Feasibility Study

Regional Rural & Coordinated Public Transportation Program

Transit System Survey

WANT A BETTER BUS SYSTEM? SO DOES MTA.

VIA Long Range Plan Glossary

Proposed Overnight Service Pilot

Travel Demand Forecasting User Guide

PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS

(Image of a moving Muni light rail vehicle in the Geneva Yard at night)

PUBLICATIONS MAPS DATA

VICTORIA REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM

10. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, LEADERSHIP, AND OVERSIGHT GUIDELINES

REGIONAL EXPRESS RAIL UPDATE

Next Generation Customer Information System. SFMTA Board of Directors Policy and Governance Committee March 23, 2018

Public Hearing for April 2018 Major Service Changes. January 4, 2018

Regional Planning Commission Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. John, St. Tammany and Tangipahoa Parishes

The Development of the PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION FUNDING STUDY

Notice of Public Hearing

Project Overview. Tampa Innovation District

Category 3, BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements. Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 5 The Authority directed staf

CALL N RIDE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Cotton Belt Corridor. Area Focus Group (AFG) North Dallas May 9, John Hoppie, Capital Planning

Taking Transit to the Next Level EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CFO DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT

First-Mile/Last-Mile Solutions for Transit Access: A National Perspective on What Has and Hasn t Changed in 45 Years of Experience

Transit Investment Direction and Plan Introduction. Transportation Advisory Board TPP Workshop August 16, 2017

Transit Market and Travel Demand Citizens Advisory Council

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

Greater Dalton Metropolitan Planning Organization

ADVERTISING 2016 INFORMATION & RATES. Kim Britton, Marketing Director

MANAGING EXISTING SYSTEMS EFFICIENTLY

Appendix B: COMMUNITY OUTREACH

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service in Downtown Los Angeles

Chapter 3 Stakeholder Interviews and Summary of Needs

Alternatives Analysis, New Starts

Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RURAL PUBLIC AND INTERCITY TRANSPORTATION OCTOBER 2-5, 2016

MEMPHIS AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN

Lethbridge Transit Master Plan. Final Report Presentation July 17, 2017

Leveraging the PMO: Doing More with Less

Regional Initiatives on Land Use and Transportation

Subject: Triennial TDA Performance Audit Final Report

DART Fare Structure. Increase. and Proposed Fare. Board Workshop January 5, 2018

Title VI Required Service Standards, Policies and Definitions

Draft SFMTA Strategic Plan

Northern Illinois Commuter Transportation Initiative (NICTI) Locally Preferred Alternative Briefing Paper

Madison Metro Transit: Transfer Point Centers. Summary: Description:

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis. Transit Talk: ULI Executive Round Table Discussion. Thursday, April 30, :30 AM 1:00 PM

Provide more frequent service Operate service for longer hours Provide more weekend service Simplify service Make service faster Improve schedules

Transcription:

Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) to support development of the Public Meetings January 28, 29 and February 2, 2015 1

Agenda Introductions DART Background and Services Phased Approach to 2040 Transit System Plan Project Overview What is a COA? Key Efforts to Date Public and Stakeholder Involvement Next Steps Open Discussion 2

DART Background Formed in 1983 13 cities today Contracted service with Mesquite & Arlington Service Area 700 Sq-mi Population Service Area 2.3 Million Region 6.6 Million One-cent sales tax Annual operating budget $459 million 3

DART Family of Services Rail DART light rail service and Trinity Railway Express commuter rail service to Fort Worth Bus Local, express, transit center feeder, crosstown, rail feeder, and miscellaneous bus services Shuttles Shuttles connecting key colleges, businesses, and public facilities, plus McKinney Avenue Trolley 4

DART Family of Services Paratransit Demand-responsive van and taxi services for persons with disabilities who are unable to use regular fixed-route services Vanpool Groups of up to 15 commuters share a van for work trips Flexible On Call and Flex zones offering personalized neighborhood service 5

Rail System by 2016 6

7

Phased Approach to 2040 Plan Phase 1 FY15 Key Issues / Guiding Principles Data Collection Transit Competitive Index (TCI) Tool Comp. Operations Analysis (COA) Future Conditions 10 Year Service Plan Phase 2 FY16 Evaluation Criteria Alternatives Development Regional Service Opportunity Evaluation / Financial Analysis Draft 2040 Plan Adopt 2040 Plan 8

Comprehensive Operations Analysis Detailed System Review Advisory Committee Customer Outreach Service Change Options What is a COA? (Comprehensive Operations Analysis) Evaluates overall transit service efficiency and effectiveness, system route structure and delivery methods Results in a comprehensive review of all transit service as a system Culminates in a set of service recommendations, usually covering a 5-10 year period of implementation 9

COA Goals Increase route and system efficiency Better serve existing and emerging transit markets Reallocate resources to improve ridership and productivity Ensure services are equitable Develop support through public and stakeholder input 10

Why Now? Current rail build-out is nearly complete Bus routes have been reorganized around phased rail openings At the same time, levels of bus service have been reduced significantly Current emphasis is on coverage throughout the Service Area Can leverage recent data collection to better understand travel and ridership patterns 11

What will we get? A better understanding of our customer and market needs A 10-Year Service Plan that phases service changes to respond to identified needs and build ridership Solid foundation build on through year 2040 - Integrate recommendations into 2040 Transit System Plan 12

Key Efforts to Date On-Board Survey Results Travel Pattern Analysis System Level Analysis Route Level Analysis 13

DART On-Board Survey On-Board Passenger Survey was conducted on DART bus and rail routes in Spring 2014 through the NCTCOG Transit Travel Survey Collected more than 40,000 surveys expanded to represent 217,000 customers Questions include origin-destination, mode of access, demographics, trip purpose, etc. 14

DART On-Board Survey - Origins 15

On-Board Survey Highlights Customers are trending younger more than 60% under age 35 Most trips are work to/from home but 33% for other purposes Approximately 50% of DART customers have to transfer vehicles to complete trip What is your age? What type of place are you going to now? 16

Travel Pattern Analysis Using actual travel data in the region for: Trip Density Mapping & Analysis Activity Center Identification Activity Center Trip Distribution Identify and Analyze Significant Travel Markets 17

Trip Density Home Based Work Origins (AM Peak) 18

Trip Density Home Based Work Destinations (AM Peak) 19

Activity Center Identification 22 Activity Centers Group of zones exhibiting large trip volumes High density trip generators / attractors (all trip purposes) Known activity centers within the region 20

Addison Activity Center Trip Interaction DFW Region Divided into zones Trip Origins and Destinations identified in each zone Map reflects Trip Density by zone Density = Trips / Square Miles in Zone 21

Downtown Dallas Activity Center Trip Interaction DFW Region Divided into zones Trip Origins and Destinations identified in each zone Map reflects Trip Density by zone Density = Trips / Square Miles in Zone 22

Uptown Dallas Activity Center Trip Interaction DFW Region Divided into zones Trip Origins and Destinations identified in each zone Map reflects Trip Density by zone Density = Trips / Square Miles in Zone 23

Deep Ellum/Baylor Activity Center Trip Interaction DFW Region Divided into zones Trip Origins and Destinations identified in each zone Map reflects Trip Density by zone Density = Trips / Square Miles in Zone 24

Medical District Activity Center Trip Interaction DFW Region Divided into zones Trip Origins and Destinations identified in each zone Map reflects Trip Density by zone Density = Trips / Square Miles in Zone 25

Service Performance System-Level Analysis Service levels and Community Characteristics Ridership volume mapping System level service performance Route Level Analysis Performance analysis and ranking by service type Segment level analysis Bus Stop level ridership activity (APC based) 26

= 0-2 = >2-10 = >10-30 = >30-100 = >100 Bus Stop Ridership Activity 27

= 0-2 = >2-10 = >10-30 = >30-100 = >100 Bus Stop Ridership Activity 28

Bus Route 453 Crosstown More than 70% of trips are for work Nearly 20% trips for shopping/leisure Nearly 90% riders under age 45 More than 50% of riders use it 5-7 days per week 29

Bus Route 183 Local More than 80% of trips are for work About 10% trips for shopping/leisure Nearly 90% riders under age 45 More than 60% of riders use it 5-7 days per week 30

Public and Stakeholder Involvement Phase 1 of 2040 TSP / Comprehensive Operations Analysis Technical Advisory Committee for COA Customer Outreach Video Updates Social Media DART City Staff Stakeholders Agency staff At transit centers Displays Direct input Short, informative video newsletters Facebook Twitter YouTube Interviews/ Briefings Meetings/ Workshops Webpage Group Input City Staff Stakeholders Service Partners Non-traditional times DART Board Project Updates Survey/feedback links Mindmixer Citizen Advisory Committee DART Customer Panel 31

Mindmixer Site DART is using Mindmixer to promote input, feedback and collaboration throughout the process. www.dart.org/movingyouforward Users register with an email and provide basic information on age, gender, and zip code DART staff engages users by posting a variety of topics How can you help? Participate! Forward the link to interested individuals or groups 32

Topics So Far 1. What s Important to You? (Instant Poll)* 2. Improving DART Services (Idea Submission)* 3. Favorite Places to Go (Idea Submission)* 4. Defining Frequent (Survey)* 5. Crosstown Connectivity (Survey)* 6. Participant Survey* 7. Service Ideas (General Idea Submission) 8. Weekend Service * Topics closed 33

MindMixer Input Some of the most frequently mentioned ideas include: Bus Network Design (simplify routes) Increase Frequency Late Night / Weekend Service Express Service (Bus and Rail) Crosstown Service (Bus, Cotton Belt) Specific Bus Route Ideas Service Area Expansion 34

On-Site Customer Outreach 35

On-Site Customer Outreach Received over 600 comments from riders Comments focused on the following: Service beyond DART Service Area More frequency on routes Extend service hours Improved connections between bus and rail, bus and bus Better service to specific markets 36

Key Issues and Opportunities Meeting future mobility needs Allocating resources in the most effective and efficient manner possible Serving existing riders while gaining new riders Serving new travel markets with focused and specialized transit services Providing the most appropriate service type to travel markets Designing competitive transit travel options Identifying new and innovative transit services 37

Next Steps & Schedule Finalize data analysis and document findings Complete Travel Pattern and Market Analysis Develop Potential Improvements and Strategies Schedule: o o Late Spring - Draft 10-Year Service Plan for Discussion Late Summer Recommend 10-Year Service Plan for DART Board approval 38

39