The effect of parasitic mistletoe (Arceuthobium pusillum)on black spruce (Picea mariana) invertebrate populations

Similar documents
Spruce Budworm Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens) Lepidoptera: Tortricidae

Habitat Selection Experiment: Examining the Coexistence of Two Sympatric. Peromyscus Species. BIOS 35502: Practicum in Environmental Field Biology

A Clear cutting History Survey of the UNDERC Property. Brian Mahon BIOS 569 Advisor: Dr. Botkin

What is Emerald Ash Borer?

VERMONT. Forest Health Programs in the Northeast. Forest Resource Summary. Forest Land Ownership

First Detector Training EMERALD ASH BORER MONITORING & MANAGEMENT

Effects of dwarf mistletoe on spruce in the White Mountains, Arizona

Please see the pages below for full description of each tree!

2015 Florida Southern Pine Beetle Forecast

Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) Management Plan December 2006

Red Pine Management Guide A handbook to red pine management in the North Central Region

Protecting Your Trees What You Need to Know About the Emerald Ash Borer. presented by

EMERALD ASH BORER WHAT EVERY MUNICIPALITY SHOULD KNOW ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO.

Inquiline Species Distribution among Sarracenia purpurea UNDERC. BIOS 569 Practicum in Field Environmental Biology. Alicia Fehring.

M. D. McGregor, D. R. Hamel, R. C. Lood, and H. E. Meyer ABSTRACT

Did you know? All coniferous trees produce two types of cones: a seed cone and a pollen cone.

Forest Health Program

BIOS 35502: Practicum in Environmental Field Biology. Elizabeth Karpus. Advisor: Dr. Walt Carson

USDA Forest Service Northeastern Area State & Private Forestry

ASSESSING TREE HEALTH FS055E. By Kevin W. Zobrist, WSU Extension Forestry Educator, WSU Extension. FS055E Page 1 ext.wsu.edu

Introduction to Dendrology

2016 Wyoming Forest Health Highlights

Emerald Ash Borer in Manitoba

Logging Effects on Amphibian Larvae Populations In Ottawa National Forest

SURVEY OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF EIGHT MAINE CONIFERS

Emerald Ash Borer Found in New York State

Final Report, August 31, Evaluation of Species Susceptibility and Chemical Management of Phomopsis Decline

Contents. Do Not Delay. You Have a Choice

Types of disease. Infectious: a disease that is caused by a pathogen which can spread from a diseased to a healthy host.

Characterization of Larval Amphibian Populations in Vernal Ponds Prior to Clear cutting and Selective Logging. Lauren Kinsman.

Aquatic Communities Aquatic communities can be classified as freshwater

Genomics & Canada s Trees Summer Street Halifax, NS B3H 0A8. genomeatlantic.ca

Climate Change and the Arctic Ecosystem

Synergies, feedbacks and tipping points: mountain pine beetle s rapid range expansion threatens invasion of North American boreal pine forests

Dwarf Mistletoe Biology and Management in Southeast Region

Relationships between Native Woody and Herbaceous Understory Vegetation Species Diversity. and Invasive Earthworm Density and Biomass at UNDERC

Mistik Management Ltd., P.O. Box 9060, Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan S9X 1V7, Canada.

Forest Health Highlights 2016

Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) A Serious Threat to Our Trees

Major Forest Types Of Michigan

TURF: Is it really a Green Desert?

Introduction Prairies, a plant community dominated by grasses, were an integral part of the

Report No EVALUATION OF PROPOSED DWARF MISTLETOE PROJECTS, WEST FORK RANGER DISTRICT, BITTERROOT NATIONAL FOREST MONTANA ABSTRACT

3. Flee & Dog: Fleas feed upon the blood of a dog or other animals. The fleas can cause itching and can pass disease.

COOLEY SPRUCE GALL APHID (ADELGES COOLEYI) AND OTHER ADELGID SPECIES IN B.C.

SCIENCE 1206 UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION TO ECOLOGY

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Threatened and Endangered Species. Picture Card Set

Promotion of herbaceous plant communities by forest canopy gaps. BIOS 35502: Practicum in Environmental Field Biology.

The New York State Hemlock Initiative A Plan to Manage the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid

North Shore Tree Concerns. Brian Schwingle Forest Insect & Disease Specialist Minnesota DNR

Future distribution and productivity of spruce-fir forests under climate change

Modeling the Effects of Habitat Fragmentation

EMERALD ASH BORER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Balsam Woolly Adelgid Adelges piceae. Glenn Kohler, Forest Entomologist Washington Department of Natural Resources

Pine Leaf Adelgid Pineus pinifolia (Fitch) Homoptera: Adelgidae

Emerald Ash Borer Plan

COOLEY SPRUCE GALL ADELGID

Ontario Envirothon LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Ontario Envirothon Learning Objectives

DATE: May 12, 2014 REPORT NO. CD TYPE OF REPORT: CONSENT ITEM [ ] ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION [ X ]

Screening Sitka Spruce for Resistance to Weevil Damage in British Columbia

The influence of American beech thickets on biodiversity in the northern hardwood forest

January Symptoms and Reporting Suspects

MASSACHUSETTS. Forest Resource Summary. Forest Health Programs in the Northeast

SNC1D BIOLOGY 5/10/2013. SUSTAINABLE ECOSYSTEMS L Biomes (P.16-17) Biomes. Biomes

How to Measure a Tree

An Overview Of Non-Chemical Strategies To Sustain Forests. Pete Angwin USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection Redding, CA

THREE-TOED WOODPECKER YEAR-ROUND HABITAT

2015 Wisconsin Envirothon KEY Forestry Exam

Monitoring the Effects of Emerald Ash Borer in the Philadelphia Urban Forest

Emerald Ash Borer. Woodlands and Wildlife Forest Festival October 2 nd Allison Winmill MScF Forest Health Specialist

What to do with a 60 + year old unmanaged red pine stand?

Forest Health Highlights 2015

Each point here will be imaged with airborne LiDAR and visited by crews to measure trees and their condition.

Proposal for Gypsy Moth Management St. Louis County, Minnesota, 2013

Assessment of Contaminated Soil in the Canadian Boreal Forest using Standardized Toxicity tests. Mary Moody, SRC Rick Scroggins, Environment Canada

Ecosystems and Food Webs

Title of the project: Diversity and Distribution of Water Mites (Acari: Hydrachnidiae) of the Interior Highlands of Arkansas

Grand Blanc High School Nature Center Forestry Unit By: Stephen Applebee

Diagnosing Spruce Problems

Proposed Action for 30-day Notice and Comment Emerald Ash Borer SLow Ash Mortality (SLAM) Hoosier National Forest Brownstown Ranger District

Succession in the Forest

2016 FOREST COVER OVERVIEW & RECOMMENDATIONS

Wisconsin s Green Fire: Voices for Conservation

WATER AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS

Landscape-level biomass opportunities

SPRUCE CONE MAGGOT (Strobilomyia neanthracina)

Silviculture and Management of Complex Forests

ASSESSING THE DIRECTION OF THE FOREST RESOURCE

Geographic range predicts photosynthetic and growth response to warming in co-occurring

Current Issue Challenge: Invasive Species Impacts on New Hampshire

AP BIOLOGY SUMMER QUESTIONS

Case Study of Bog Change on Long Lake in Aitkin County, Minnesota USA

United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Region. Wallowa-Whitman National Forest

Keystone Biology Remediation B4: Ecology

3-1 What is Ecology?! The study of the. interactions among organisms and between organisms and their environment

Under-Burning and Dwarf Mistletoe: Scorch N Toe David A. Conklin 1 and Brian W. Geil

Migration Dynamics of Invasive Earthworms in Varied Soil Moisture Conditions at UNDERC

What is Ecology? Abiotic (non-living) Biotic (living)

2015 Insect and Disease Update for Rocky Mountain. Region

Transcription:

The effect of parasitic mistletoe (Arceuthobium pusillum)on black spruce (Picea mariana) invertebrate populations GRACE FORTHAUS FORTH1GA@CMICH.EDU UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER MENTOR: DR. ROSE MARIE MUZIKA

Forthaus 2 Abstract Black spruce (Picea mariana) are found frequently within forests of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, where they are commonly infected by eastern dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium pusillum). The species richness and evenness of native invertebrate populations was studied to determine if A. pusillum had an impact on their presence within the ecosystem. Branch beating was the method used to collect samples of native insects from both affected and unaffected P. mariana. There was no significant difference in the species richness or evenness of native invertebrate populations found between the affected and unaffected trees. Though a significant difference was found between the invertebrate populations and the three bog ecosystems they were collected from. All of the sampling locations were within a 10-mile radius of each other, but had varying species richness levels when compared to one another. This could be possible because of the difference in predator densities among the three bogs, ph differences, or differences in plant diversity between the three different locations. Overall, it was concluded that more research should be done to determine why this newly discovered trend exists. Introduction In the northeast United States, spruce trees (Picea) are an important asset to the health and diversity of the forest and provide habitats for many native insect and animal species. However, they are susceptible to a large number of pathogens and parasites that may cause injury or death. Some of the parasites that affect the northeastern spruce forests are spruce budworm, spruce sawflies, gall-forming adelgids, and dwarf mistletoe (Natural Resources Canada 2015). Dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium) is one of the most widely prevalent tree pathogens in the United States (Hoffman 2004). It is found throughout the entire continental United States and has 34 species in the New World (USDA Forest Service 1996). This widespread parasite only affects

Forthaus 3 coniferous hosts and many species of the Arceuthobium genus have adapted to infect a few specific conifer species. Dwarf mistletoe has extremely limited photosynthetic abilities, so most of their nutrients are taken from their host s xylem and phloem. (Logan et al. 2013). The infection causes vascular damage, reduces needle size, lowers chlorophyll levels and possibly results in tree death (Logan and Reblin 2017). The decline in overall tree health of the tree may reduce the prevalence of organisms that inhabit the tree. Lower species richness and evenness within the tree would indicate that Arceuthobium is not only causing tree damage but is harming populations of other native organisms. This study focused on infection by eastern spruce dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium pusillum) because it was easily identified and prevalent at the study site. Black spruce (Picea mariana) was chosen for observation and testing because it is the species most severely affected by A. pusillum (Baker et al. 2006). The effect of A. pusillum on P. mariana has been extensively studied; however, there is little information on how A. pusillum affects the invertebrate communities that inhabit P. mariana. This research examined the richness and diversity of the invertebrate communities of trees infected with A. pusillum compared to trees without A. pusillum. The initial hypothesis is that infection of A. pusillum in P. mariana would cause decreased species richness and evenness in native invertebrates that inhabit the trees. Materials and Methods Study area- Before conducting this study, I surveyed the bog areas located on the University of Notre Dame Environmental Research Center Property. This property is around 7500 acres of forests, wetlands, lakes and bogs. The land is located adjacent to the Ottawa National Forest in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, near the Wisconsin state line. Three

Forthaus 4 locations, Cranberry Bog, Tenderfoot Bog, and North Gate Bog (Figure 3) that showed sufficient evidence of Arceuthobium pusillum infestation in the Picea mariana population for study. Experimental Procedure: Tree Selection- In each of these sites 10 affected and 10 unaffected trees were identified and numbered. The trees had to be at least 10 feet tall with a living branch that was at least one-meter long. Affected trees had to have A. pusillum present, while the unaffected trees could not have any presence of A. pusillum on any part of the tree. Seven affected trees and seven unaffected trees from each of the three sites were chosen at random through a random number generator. A total of 21 affected and 21 unaffected trees were sampled across the three sampling locations. Experimental Procedure: Invertebrate Collection- The branch beating method was conducted to obtain an insect sample from the affected and unaffected P. mariana. To conduct the branch beating, a branch, of at least one meter in length and at approximately breast height (1.3m), was chosen from each sample tree. A 70 by 125 centimeter cotton sheet was held taut under the selected branch by two individuals. The branch was swiftly hit with a wooden pole for approximately 15 seconds allowing for the insect sample, as well as other debris, to be collected on the sheet. The entire sample was shaken to the center of the sheet and funneled into a kill jar that was charged with a cotton ball soaked in acetone. Two jars were used in each location, one for the affected samples and another for the unaffected samples. The jars were brought back to the lab where the organic debris was separated from the insect samples. The invertebrates were then classified by order and then recorded. Statistical Analysis- This data was analyzed using the Shannon diversity index to compare the order richness of the affected and unaffected species as well as to compare the difference in order richness across the different locations. The data was also tested using stronger

Forthaus 5 statistical tests. After confirming normality, the data was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA in order to test for significant differences between the affected and unaffected trees. Another ANOVA was run to test the diversity of invertebrate orders among the three test sites. Results The data (Figure 1) comparing the diversity of invertebrate orders sampled of the affected and unaffected tree samples resulted in a normal distribution. This normalcy indicated that the data could be evaluated using parametric measures. There was not a significant difference in the diversity of invertebrate order richness between affected and unaffected tree samples (1-way ANOVA, F 1,2 =.062, p= 0.815). The data comparing the order diversity of the three different locations initially was not normally distributed. This data was squared in order to transform and normalize the data. There was a significant difference in insect order richness among study sites (1-way ANOVA, F 2,3 = 9.667, p= 0.0492). The data was also analyzed using the Shannon diversity test to test for species richness and evenness (Figure 2). The paired unaffected and affected tree samples in Cranberry both resulted in a 0.74 Shannon value. The paired unaffected and affected tree samples in Tenderfoot resulted in 0.51 and 0.53, respectively, for Shannon values. The paired unaffected and affected tree samples from North Gate resulted 0.45 and 0.55 respectively, for Shannon values. Discussion The initial test of Shannon diversity showed little difference between the order richness and evenness between affected and unaffected trees at each site (Figure 2). This indicated that even before using strong statistical tests, that there was not likely to be statistical significance of the order richness when comparing affected and unaffected tree statuses. This was confirmed with a one-way ANOVA of the data that showed that this data was not significant. This fails to

Forthaus 6 reject the null hypothesis that the infection status of a tree would have an affect on the invertebrate population. Comparing the Shannon diversity values of the different locations, there is a visible difference between the three bogs. The Cranberry bog sample showed the greatest order richness and diversity for both unaffected and affected tree species. This qualitative data suggests that stronger statistical tests may be significant. This was confirmed with a one-way ANOVA that significant differences of order diversity between the sites. This significant result showed that the invertebrate order diversities are not the same at each bog location. This result is fascinating considering that all of these bog ecosystems were located within 10 miles of each other and appeared to have similar plant populations. Possible differences could include different predators at each location, different ph levels, or general plant composition. Change in predator prevalence causes a top-down reaction changing the prevalence of all of the species related to that food chain (Gross 2006). The ph levels of the bog can also affect invertebrate reproduction. Many bog invertebrates rely on a water source during their larval growth, notably the Insecta orders Emphemeroptera, Hemiptera, Coleoptera and Diptera, all observed in this study (Judd 1961). Collembola are also highly affected by water quality due to their semi-aquatic nature (DeWalt et al 2010). The plant composition may also affect the invertebrate population especially in bogs, because of the uniqueness of many plant species. Pitcher plants are both predators and food resources for different types of invertebrates. These plants trap and kill insects which are then a food source for invertebrate detritivores (Hamilton 2010). Different densities and species of these carnivorous plants are able to impact the invertebrate population of the area.

Forthaus 7 Even though the data failed to reject the null hypothesis, this study created the possibility for further studies of what causes order differences between bogs in similar areas. Even though the initial hypothesis was rejected, this study suggests the need for future study about what causes differences in invertebrate communities among bogs in similar areas. Bogs are an important and sensitive ecosystem therefore more knowledge about this habitat provides further information about how bog damage may be affecting a variety of native species. Acknowledgements I would like to thank the University of Notre Dame and funding from the Hank Family Endowment for giving me the opportunity to conduct research on this property. I would also like to thank Dr. Rose-Marie Muzika for inspiration behind this project. I am extremely thankful for all the help from my classmates but I would especially like to thank Suheily Arce and Monica Depies. They were willing to do everything from trudging through bogs to sorting thousands of spruce needles in order to make this happen. I would also like to thank John Fields for the time he took to make numerous edits leading up to the final draft of this paper. References Cited Baker, F.A. et al. 2006. Eastern spruce dwarf mistletoe. U.S. Department of Agriculture: Forest Service. p 1-7. DeWalt et al. 2010. Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Elsevier Inc. p. 587-657 Gross, L. 2006. Predicting Species Abundance in the Face of Habitat Loss. PLOS Biology. p 336 Hamilton, R. 2010. Observations of pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea L.) phytotelm conditions from two populations in jackson bog, stark county, OH. The Ohio Journal of Science. p. 98

Forthaus 8 Hoffman, J. T. 2004. Management guide for dwarf mistletoe. Forest Health Protection and State Forestry Organizations, p 12. Judd, W. W. 1961. Studies of the byron bog in southwestern ontario. XII. A study of the population of insects emerging as adults from redmond's pond in 1957. The American Midland Naturalist. p 89-100. Logan, B. A., J. S. Reblin, 2017. Researchers from Bowdoin College Report on Findings in Botany [Needle properties of host white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) experiencing eastern dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium pusillum Peck) infections of differing severity] Life Science Weekly p. 4443 Logan, B. A. et al. 2013. Impact of eastern dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium pusillum) on host white spruce (Picea glauca) development, growth and performance across multiple scales Physiologia Plantarum. p 502-513. Natural Resources Canada. 2015. Black spruce. Government of Canada: Canadian Forest Service. USDA Forest Service. 1996. Dwarf mistletoe: biology, pathology, and systematics. Eds. F.G. Hawksworth and D. Weins. Agricultural Handbook 709. p. 410.

Forthaus 9 Figures 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Unaffected Affected Unaffected Affected Unaffected Affected Cranberry Cranberry Tenderfoot Tenderfoot North Gate North Gate Figure 1: Number of Orders from each area and status of tree tested ANOVA test of affected vs. unaffected p= 0.815 ANOVA test of Location (Cranberry-Tenderfoot-North Gate) p=0.0492 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Unaffected Cranberry Affected Cranberry Unaffected Tenderfoot Affected Tenderfoot Unaffected North Gate Affected North Gate Figure 2: Differences of Shannon diversity value for each area and status of tree tested Shannon values from left to right (0.74, 0.74, 0.51, 0.53, 0.45, 0.55)

Forthaus 10 Figure 3: Three test bogs marked on the UNDERC property North Gate Bog, Cranberry and Tender(foot) Bog designated with a blue star