Lecture on Foundation Settlements-immediate settlement

Similar documents
Typical set up for Plate Load test assembly

Area Ratio A % % = 16.88%

REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED 33/11 KV SUB STATION AT JAUN SAMANA, MARIPAT, GREATER NOIDA IN UTTAR PRADESH

2.6 Methods of Soil Sampling

A Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil & Soil investigation

Exploration, Sampling, and In Situ Soil Measurements. Dr. Omar Al-Hattamleh

Site Investigation MUHAMMAD AZRIL HEZMI

GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (1449-R2-NALANDA UNIVERSITY)

SITE INVESTIGATION Validation and Interpretation of data

Seismic Design & Retrofit of Bridges- Geotechnical Considerations


Mariamman Kullam. Mariamman kullam TOILET BLOCK. 2m wide pathway

The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

CERTIFICATE FOR: CADD CONSULTING ENGINEERS PVT. LTD

3. FIELD INVESTIGATION PROGRAM

Downloaded from Downloaded from /1

Geotechnical Investigation at Various Locations in Bangalore

Subsurface Investigations PDCA Professor s Driven Pile Institute. Loren R. Anderson Utah State University June 25, 2015

TG 10l SOUTH AUSTRALIAN WATER CORPORATION

Estimation of vertical subgrade reaction coefficient from CPT investigations: applications in Christchurch

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I-15 SIGN BRIDGES LAS VEGAS EA JANUARY

CERTIFICATE FOR: CADD CONSULTING ENGINEERS PVT. LTD

RAO ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES Geotechnical Consultants, Land Surveyors, Piling Contractor & GPR Surveyors

Conventional Field Testing Methods and Issues

BEHAVIOUR OF SQUARE FOOTING RESTING ON TWO LAYERED CLAY DEPOSITS. Dr. Sunil S. Pusadkar 1, Sheetal M. Baral 2 ABSTRACT

SITE INVESTIGATION. Foundation Engineering

PARAMETRIC STUDY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION BEARING CAPACITY IN CLAYEY SOIL

Macro Standard Penetration Test measurements Examined with a micro scale PDM device

paterson -MEMO consulting engineers

Compressibility of Soil. Chapter 11

June i TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: GEOTECH ENTERPRISES, INC.

A Case Study: Foundation Design in Liquefiable Site

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON RAK ACADEMIC CENTRE BENG (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2017/2018 GROUND AND WATER STUDIES 1

Brooks/Cole Thomson LearningiM. Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering. Braja M. Das. California State University, Sacramento

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT. FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR PROPOSED 2 x 25 MVA 66/11kV G-1 SUB-STATION AT DWARKA, NEW DELHI.

Site Location. Figure 1: Site Location Map US-24 and I-275 Interchange Ash Township, Monroe County, Michigan


Comparison of the results of load test done on stone columns and rammed aggregate piers using numerical modeling

DIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: IDEAL MANUFACTURING, INC. 999 PICTURE PARKWAY WEBSTER, NEW YORK 14580

Case History: Value Engineering of Driven H-Piles for Slope Stability on the Missouri River

Rewa Engineering College, Rewa. Rewa

Applied GeoScience, Inc Hammond Dr., Suite 6 Schaumburg, Illinois

PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDNTIAL APARTMENT AT BAJANAI KOIL STREET,SELAIYUR

Study on the settlement and the load-bearing capacity of Long An soft ground reinforced by the stone columns

FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT -1 SITE INVESTIGATION & SELECTION OF FOUNDATION 1. What are components of total foundation settlement?

Jericho Agro Industrial Park

Geotechnical Engineering Report

DIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: GOLIATHTECH INCORPORATED 175B RUE PELADEAU MAGOG, QUEBEC J1X 5G9 CANADA

NPTEL Course GROUND IMPROVEMENT USING MICROPILES

PROCEEDINGS FROM THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL FLAT DILATOMETER CONFERENCE

Minimum Guidelines for the Design and Use of Underpins When Performing Foundation Stabilization and/or Supplementation UP-08

Subsurface Investigation Report. Proposed New 1-Story Building 6447 Grand Avenue Gurnee, Illinois

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT US 93 WILDLIFE UNDERCROSSINGS North of Wells, Nevada E.A July 2009

Research Paper PERFORMANCE OF STRIP FOOTING ON SANDY SOIL DUE TO TUNNELING S.Hariswaran 1, K.Premalatha 2, K.Raja 3

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN REPORT

Introduction to CPT. Peter K. Robertson. Santiago, Chile. CPT in Geotechnical Practice. July, 2014

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Report on Geotechnical Investigation for Setting up of AIIMS. Kalyani. West Bengal

CONDUCTED FOR: PREPARED FOR: 5 May 2016 YPC Project No. 16GY146

patersongroup Prepared For Minto Communities Inc. April 2, 2018 Report: PG4444-2

patersongroup Geotechnical Investigation Clarke Lands - Stage 1 Residential Development Strandherd Road at Kennedy Burnett Drain Ottawa, Ontario

ADDENDUM NO. 1. Clarification/Question/Answer/Updated Plan Sheets

Consultant Specifications for Subsurface Investigation & Geotechnical Analysis and Design Recommendations

DIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: EMPIRE PIERS 2656 EAST HWY 47 WINFIELD, MO EVALUATION SUBJECT:

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED OUTFALL LOCATION CITY OF MORGAN S POINT DRAINAGE HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS REPORT NO

DIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: CANTSINK MANUFACTURING, INC. 71 FIRST AVENUE LILBURN, GEORGIA 30047

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION. Burn and Rescue Facility Spartanburg County Emergency Services Academy Duncan, SC GeoTrack Project No.

SOIL MECHANICS CIVIL ENGINEERING VIRTUAL LABORATORY

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION & GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS PROPOSED MONOPOLE CELL TOWER INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA A&W PROJECT NO: 15IN0464

DIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: HELICAL ANCHORS, INC BOONE AVENUE, NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55428

patersongroup Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Buildings 1800 Baseline Road Ottawa, Ontario Prepared For Minto Communities

DHANALAKSHMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING 2 MARK QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS CE FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT 1

Settlement Rehabilitation of a 35 Year Old Building: A Case Study Integrated with Analysis and Implementation

GEOTECHNICAL SUBSURFACE DATA REPORT

EXHIBIT G GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (DRAFT)

EFFECT OF DEEP EXCAVATION SUPPORTED BY CONCRETE SOLIDER PILE WITH STEEL SHEET PILE LAGGING WALL ON ADJACENT EXISTING BUILDINGS

Investigation of Foundation Failure of a Residential Building A Case Study

Bernard Benoit Project Management Inc. August DST File No.: GS-OT

Performance assessment of ground improvement with rapid impact compaction

Evaluation the Effectiveness of Rapid Impact Compaction (RIC) as a Ground Improvement Technique

CONTRACT 5E-2 APPENDIX A - TEST HOLE LOGS DYREGROV ROBINSON INC. PORTAGE AVE WINSTON DR BOURKEVALE CAVELL PARKSIDE DR ASSINIBOINE AVE

4. FIELD VANE SHEAR TEST (VST) One of the objectives of this research is to correlate the high quality CRS

Earth Mechanics, Inc. Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering

RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTAION OF DMG SPECIAL PUBLICATION 117 GUIDELINES FOR ANALYZING AND MITIGATING LIQUEFACTION IN CALIFORNIA

ICC-ES Evaluation Report Issued August 1, 2011 This report is subject to renewal in one year.

It is our understanding that a three storey residential building is being proposed for the aforementioned site and will have one basement level.

The use of flexible flaps in improving the settlement resistent behaviour of raft foundations

Analysis and Design of the Kingdom Tower Piled Raft Foundation

patersongroup 1.0 Field Investigation Consulting Engineers October 18, 2017 PG4273-LET.01

Field Static Load Testing of Concrete Free Reticulated Micropiles System

Foundation Engineering

Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Communications Tower Spain Park Site Hoover, Alabama

BEHAVIOUR OF GEOTEXTILE REINFORCED STONE COLUMNS MANITA DAS, A.K.DEY ABSTRACT

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN REPORT

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

SECTION SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION. 1. Protection of the environment; Section

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT - REVISED PROPOSED KEG RESTAURANT 15 HUNTMAR DRIVE KANATA (OTTAWA), ONTARIO. Submitted to:

Addendum # 1 Public Safety Complex Wetland Date of Addendum: 2/23/17

Analysis of Four Load Tests on Augered Cast-in-Place Piles in the Texas Gulf Coast Soils Raghu Dass, PE, Woodward Vogt, PE, and Frank Ong, PE

Transcription:

Lecture on 21-3-15 CE-319 (3 Credit Hours) Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering Foundation Settlements-immediate settlement Instructor: Dr Irshad Ahmad Department of Civil Engineering University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar 1

Contents Foundation Settlement- Introduction Some Typical Loads on Building Foundations Number and Depth of boring Immediate settlement calculations using Theory of Elasticity SPT Procedure SPT corrections SPT correlations Immediate settlement using SPT 2

Foundation Settlement 3

Foundation Settlement 4

Some Typical Loads on Building Foundations Settlements are cause by change in stress in the soil mass Change in stress occurs because Of building loads 5

Foundation Settlement 6

Number of borings Depth of borings 7

Depth of boring For Square footing: 10% qo at 2B For Strip footing 10% qo at 6.5B For circular footing 10% qo at 2 Dia 8

Immediate Settlement We will find immediate settlement through THEORY OF ELASTICITY USING STANDARD PENETRATION TEST RESULTS 9

Immediate Settlement- Theory Of Elasticity 10

Immediate Settlement 11

Shape and Rigidity factor I 12

Example Method-1: Taking weighted average of Es Method-2: Method of superposition Both methods are discussed in class 13

Example-Using Weighted Average of Es Es (average) = (42.5 3 + 60 8)/11=55 Mpa, H=11m, B =B/2=33.5/2=16.75, H/ B =11/16.75=0.66 (use 0.7) L /B = (39.5/2)/(33.5/2)= 1.18 Assume, =0.33, I=0.12 (after interpolation) H=qoB (1-2 )/Es m I = 134 16.75 (1-0.33 2 )/(55 1000) 4 0.12 = 0.0175m = 17.5 mm 14

Example- Method of Superposition Methodology: Calculate Hi (1) Consider the 3m Sand layer with Es overlying sand stone. (2) Consider whole 11m layer as Clay with Es=60 MPa overlying Sand stone. (3) Consider upper 3m layer as Clay with Es=60 Mpa overlaying Sandstone. 15

Es = 42.5Mpa, H=3m,B =B/2=16.75, H/ B =3/16.75=0.18, L /B = 1.18 I=0.0316 H=qoB (1-2 )/Es m I 134 16.75 (1-0.33 2 )/(42.5 4 0.0316 = 5.96 mm Es = 60 Mpa, Es = 60 Mpa, H=11m,B =B/2=16.75, H=3m, B =B/2=16.75, H/B =3/16.75=0.18, L /B = 1.18 H/B =3/16.75=0.18, L /B = 1.18 I=0.12 I=0.0316 H=qoB (1-2 )/Es m I H=qoB (1-2 )/Es m I 134 16.75 (1-0.33 2 )/(60 4 134 16.75 (1-0.33 2 )/(60 4 0.0316 0.0316 = 16 mm = 4.2 mm H= 5.96 + 16-4.2 = 17.7 mm 16

Standard Penetration Test (ASTM D-1586) Practicing Engineers use the SPT widely in estimating the bearing capacity of soils and to assess the in-situ relative density of a sand deposit. The test is performed using a split spoon barrel sampler 50mm external diameter, 35mm internal diameter and about 650mm in length and connected to the end of boring rods. After boring has been advanced to the desired sampling elevation and excessive cutting has been removed, attach the split spoon sampler to the sampling rods and lover into borehole. Drive the sample with blows from 140lb (63.5 kg) hammer falling freely through a height of 760mm (30 inch). The sampler is advanced under the impact of the hammer into three successive (6 inch) increments. (i.e. total 18 inch). 17

Standard Penetration Test (ASTM D-1586) Count the number of blows in each 6 inch increment until one of the following occurs A total of 50 blows have been applied during any of the three 6 inch increments. A total of 100 blows have been applied There is no observed advance of the sampler during the application of 10 successive blows of the hammer. The sampler is advanced the complete 18 inch without the limiting blow counts occurring as describe in 1,2 and 3. The 1 st 6 inch is considered to be a seating drive. The sum of the number of blows required for the 2 nd and 3 rd 6-inch penetration is termed the standard penetration resistance or the N-value. 18

Disturbance caused by Split spoon sampler 19

Standard Penetration Test (ASTM D-1586) 20

Thin wall tube sampler (Shelby tubes) 21

Hammers 22

Standard Penetration Test (ASTM D-1586) 23

Corrected N- value 24

N-value corrections 25

SPT Correlations 26

SPT Correlations 27

SPT Correlations 28

SPT Correlations Undrained shear strength cu(kn/m 2 ) = 29 (N 60 ) 0.72 [Hara, et al. 1971] 29

30

Immediate Settlement: SPT (Bowels P263) N60 SI Fps F1 0.05 2.5 F2 0.08 4 F3 0.3 1 F4 1.2 4 31

Design N Values 32

Problem (Bowel P-266) Fill up the below table using equation for the widths given and prepare a graph 33

PROBLEM 34

PROBLEM 35

Example (Bowels P-543) Find allowable BC qa to ensure FOS=3 against Shear failure Si <= 50 m Solution: (1) Shear Criteria: qu = c Nc s c + D Nq + ½ B N s BC factors: For ⱷ = 0, Nc = 5.14, Nq = 1 and N = 0 Shape factors: sc=1.3, and s =0.8 qu (net)= qu(gross) - D = (150 5.14 1.3 + 18.7 1.5 1) - 18.7 1.5 = 1000 kpa qsafe = qu/fos = 334 kn/m 2 36

Example (Bowels P-543) Es1= 1000 cu = 1000(300/2)=150 000 kpa Es2= 500(N 55 +15)= 500[18(70/55)+15]=18950 kpa Es2= 500(N 55 +15)= 500[22(70/55)+15]=22 000 kpa Es2= 500(N 55 +15)= 500[40(70/55)+15]=32 900 kpa (2) Settlement Criteria Es(average)= 3.4(150000)+3.3(18950)+7(22000) +13.8(32900)]/27.5 = 42 930 kpa H from base of the mat to rock = (4.9-1.5)+3.3+7+13.8 = 27.5m, Estimate the mat will be on the order of 14m, giving B =B/2=14/2=7, H/ B =27.5/7 4, L /B = 1 For =0.33, I=0.42 (after interpolation) H=qoB (1-2 )/Es m I 0.05 = qo 7 (1-0.33 2 )/(42930) 4 0.42 qo= 204 kpa Allowable Bearing Capacity: qa=200 kpa, settlement controls: As the design proceeds and B is found to be substantially different from 14m, it may be 37 necessary to revise qa.