CHANGE IN THE FREIGHT MARKET: TRENDS, DISRUPTORS & FAST ACT

Similar documents
Multimodal Freight Transportation Policy Overview

Virginia Critical Rural and Urban Freight Corridor Designation WebEx Discussion. September 28, 2017, 10:30 12:00

FHWA Programs Supporting Freight

Freight Provisions in the FAST ACT

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

Freight Handler to the Nation. Freight Planning in the Chicago Metropolitan Area

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

OHIO STATEWIDE FREIGHT STUDY PROGRESS UPDATE. Ohio Conference on Freight: September 12, 2012

Inland Port Cargo Complex

AASHTO Policy Papers Topic IX: Freight

Freight Plans Planning, Preparing Staying Ahead. MAASTO July, 2013

Coalition for America s Gateways and Trade Corridors

Minnesota s Statewide Freight System Plan and Freight Investment Plan

Carolina Connector Intermodal Terminal (CCX)

Freight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar. January 7, 2014

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: DRAFT KEY POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Statewide Freight Study/ Plan

AAPA Executive Management Conference May 4, 2017 Rickey Fitzgerald, FDOT Freight & Multimodal Operations Office Manager

The Infrastructure Challenge: Perspectives on the Road Ahead

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

MAP-21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Creates jobs and supports economic growth

Integrating Freight into Transportation Planning. Keith Robbins District Freight Coordinator, FDOT District One

Status of Freight Planning in the Alamo Area MPO

LOUISIANA FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN Donald Vary. March 1, 2016

TRB Panel on the Future of the Interstate

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

The National Gateway Preparing for Tomorrow

Trade & Logistics: Understanding the Industry

Multimodal National Freight Policy Freight Corridors

Marine Transportation System Infrastructure Investment A State Perspective. August 28, 2012 Sean T. Connaughton Secretary of Transportation

Metropolitan Planning Organizations & Statewide Freight Integrating Local and State Planning Efforts. October 25, 2015

Connecting Hinterlands to Ports Through Rail Investment

Appendix F: Scenario Planning

Data Driven Results: North Carolina s Strategic Prioritization Process through SPOT On!ine. NCDOT Strategic Prioritization Office April 4, 2016

The Emergence of. Florida s Seaports and Inland Ports. Florida League of Cities - International Relations Committee November 17, 2011

Exploring Florida s Transportation Future

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Regional Freight Plan

Transportation Consortium at the Center for Transportation February 14, 2014

Effects of the Panama Canal Expansion on Texas Ports and Highway Corridors. executive summary

THE DEMAND ECONOMY THE CHANGING WORLD OF RETAIL AND THE IMPACT ON SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY AND INDUSTRIAL REQUIREMENTS

IDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PROJECT METRICS. February 2018

INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

Minnesota Statewide Freight System Plan Action Agenda Development Lead Agency (MnDOT or

congestion management process

Intermodalism -- Metropolitan Chicago's Built-In Economic Advantage

Presentation to DATA on VTrans 2040 / HB2. October 21, 2015

Researching Urban Freight. Bruce Lambert

The National Gateway Preparing for Tomorrow Lisa Mancini, VP Strategic Infrastructure Initiatives

Future of Transportation in Florida

2017 Freight System Plan

Factors Affecting Transportation Decisions. Transportation in a Supply Chain. Transportation Modes. Road freight transport Europe

Florida Transportation Plan and Strategic Intermodal System Policy Plan Regional Workshop

Ohio 21 st Century Transportation System It s Ours to Create!

Status of Freight Planning in the Alamo Area MPO

FTP/SIS Steering Committee Work Plan and PPI Update

Freight Corridors: Changes and Challenges

WTP Phase 2 Implementation & Freight System Plan

Project Application Guidelines. For the. Major New Capacity Program

Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF MAPS CHAPTER 1: REGIONAL GOODS MOVEMENT: LINKS TO OUR PAST AND TO OUR FUTURE

INTERMODAL THE PRESSURE IS ON

FAST Act House and Senate Freight Provisions

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: PRIORITIZING FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

Freight: Challenging the Role of Public Sector Officials

Freight Work Group. May 1, :30 am 11:30 am

Freight Investment Plan Update

ATLANTA REGIONAL FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN UPDATE

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

P4.0 Highway Quantitative Scoring Workgroup Recommendations

Kansas Freight Advisory Committee

2009 Ohio Conference on Freight

Are We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER

Efficiency and Sustainability in Multi-Modal Supply Chains. Jean-Paul Rodrigue Dept. of Global Studies & Geography, Hofstra University, New York, USA

MULTIMODAL NETWORK ANALYSIS FOR COAL FREIGHT IN KENTUCKY SESSION 6.2.3

CRITICAL RURAL FREIGHT CORRIDORS SWRPC Transportation Advisory Committee May 7, 2018

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

2016 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, October 24-25, Donna Brown-Martin, Director Bureau of Planning and Economic Development

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

Will County Freight Advisory Council Meeting. April 11, 2017

GREATER CHARLOTTE REGIONAL FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation

Planning for Container Growth Along the Houston Ship Channel and other Texas Seaports. TxDOT Project

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies

Rickenbacker Inland Port Multimodal Infrastructure Improvements. Ohio Conference On Freight September 12, 2013

Statewide Bluetooth Data Collection

Freight Investment Plan Update

Will County Community Friendly Freight Mobility Plan: Executive Committee Update

Northeast Clean Freight Corridors Workgroup #5 Designating Alternative Fuel Corridors

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

Preparing for the future today. Formerly known as Treasure Coast Intermodal Campus St. Lucie County, Florida USA

Addendum 1: Performance Measures

Innovations in Freight Planning and Project Prioritization

Components of an Attractive Minnesota Freight Market

Re: Docket No. DOT-OST , Establishment of Interim National Multimodal Freight Network

Chapter 3 Missouri Freight System

Development of the I-70 Corridor of National Significance

GNC Coalition Update. Washington Public Ports Association Trade and Transportation Committee November 18, 2015

Freight Planning in Central Ohio Delaware Valley Goods Movement Task Force July 9, 2003

Measuring Supply Chain Performance with Fluidity Data

State of Idaho Profile

Glen Weisbrod Economic Development Research Group, Inc.

Transcription:

CHANGE IN THE FREIGHT MARKET: TRENDS, DISRUPTORS & FAST ACT Joseph Bryan OHIO PLANNING CONFERENCE JULY 2016

Agenda Overview Distribution Networks Retail Home Delivery Intermodal Rail Developments CAV 3D Manufacturing FAST Act & FASTLANE

Supply Chain Trends: Last 3 Years Number of SKU's 80% 12% 8% Direct to Consumer Sales 75% 25% Exports as a % of Outbound Shipments 60% 20% 20% Degree of Automation 60% 25% 15% DC Operating Hours 55% 13% 32% Cross Dock Volume 50% 33% 17% Outbound Order Size 50% 20% 30% Inbound Order Size 44% 6% 50% Imports as a % of Inbound Shipments 30% 26% 44% Live Loading Trucks 20% 45% 35% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Increasing Trend No Change Decreasing Trend Source: Tompkins International: Supply Chain Consortium

Supply Chain Trends: Next 3 Years Number of SKU's 85% 7% 8% Direct to Consumer Sales 100% Exports as a % of Outbound Shipments 60% 20% 20% Degree of Automation 80% 5% 15% DC Operating Hours 65% 13% 22% Cross Dock Volume 60% 33% 17% Outbound Order Size 30% 20% 50% Inbound Order Size 45% 10% 45% Imports as a % of Inbound Shipments 30% 26% 44% Live Loading Trucks 30% 35% 35% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Increasing Trend No Change Decreasing Trend Source: Tompkins International: Supply Chain Consortium

Tripling of Distribution Centers 4 years ago 6.4 DCs 240,000 ft 2 2 years ago 12.6 DCs 218,000 ft 2 Today 18.1 DCs 190,000 ft 2 Drivers: Time to Market Warehouse Automation Source: Tompkins International: Supply Chain Consortium High throughput, high ceilings, 2/3 smaller footprints Effect: Different economic geography, different role for master DCs (e.g. Columbus)

Retail Home Delivery ecommerce compound growth rate 17% since 2000, vs. 3% for storefront retail Signals profound and costly shift in retail with large effect on freight patterns Storefront vs. on-line strategies being invented Transportation planning must keep pace with change Chart Source: Alix Partners analysis of US Census data

Home Delivery Market Dynamics Battle for convenience Store or collection point pickup vs. delivery to consumer door Same day and 1 hour delivery require local staging facilities Battle to capture and grow limited route density Free delivery option now standard; same day is competitive wedge Free delivery encourages household bulks (e.g. paper products, pet food) means more and larger delivery trucks Emerging afternoon delivery pattern Developing demography: e.g. on-line millennials; aging, less-mobile baby boomers Chart Source: Alix Partners

Growth in Home Delivery Product Types Alix Partners Consumer Survey, 2016 vs. 2014: Products bought for delivery in past 12 months

Some Implications Challenge and opportunity for community integration of freight Neighborhood conflicts and security concerns Consumer benefits of freight become visible Delays become visible, too Freight may begin to vote Venue for cleaner, safer trucks e.g. via alternative fuels, CAV technology Amazon becoming a freight carrier New air hub at Wilmington Internalizing and walling off economies Logistics system is strategic advantage And revenue stream, like cloud computing

Intermodal Rail Developments NW Ohio Hub CCX NC Hub CSX NW Ohio hub represents new operating model Enabled by new crane technology Greater (& green) terminal capacity Builds corridor density to go beyond point-to-point service Serves formerly underserved markets: 550+ Miles Network now expanding with new CSX hub in NC Location announced July 2016 Puts more lanes & markets in play More service options for OH

Connected & Automated/Autonomous Vehicles (CAV) Future clearly arriving Family of technologies Sensors, driver assist are here now Truck platoons in active test Signal prioritization available Capacity gains a major draw Safety the probable entry way for freight Other performance gains ride coattails Start in controlled environments Turnpike doubles to platoons is no leap of imagination 11

Manufacturing by 3D Printing Product Suitability for 3D Printing Source: GRA Supply Chain Pty Ltd 3D substitutes local production for longer distance transportation from plants and DCs Major effect on transportation demand for right products Works for: specialized products, urgent products, replacement parts, some component parts Low volume, moderate valued products that require high customization on short lead times And again, the future is arriving

On-Demand 3D Printing Manufacturing Network Distributed on-demand manufacturing joint venture launched 5/16 UPS (facilities & delivery); SAP (enterprise supply chain management systems) Fast Radius (fabrication design) Production at 60+ UPS locations, including Dayton (Oakwood) & Cleveland (Lyndhurst) Offers integrated supply chain solution: SAP customers optimize use of 3D option Production scheduled at appropriate location Next day UPS zone 1 (or air) delivery Leverages large number of SAP & UPS users Stimulates market trial & development

FAST Act Freight Provisions Funding expressly for freight created for first time through $300 bil. 5-year federal FAST Act $6.3 bil. National Highway Freight Program formula funds dedicated to freight $4.5 bil. Nationally Significant Freight & Highway Projects (NSFHP) competitive grant program $4.0 bil. for highway projects, freight and passenger $0.5 bil. dedicated to freight rail and ports Pace of change outstrips infrastructure: 18,000 TEU ship arrives in LALB 6 months before new 12,000 TEU Panama Canal locks open Yields $214 mil. OH formula freight funds, averaging $43 mil. per year Graduated amounts Up to 10% for freight rail and ports

Use of Ohio Formula Funds OH formula funds useable on network with 3 components: Primary highway freight system: 1,425 miles of OR interstates and intermodal connectors already designated by US DOT in 41,500 mile national system adopted in FAST Critical Rural Freight Corridors: 285 miles statewide, designated by ODOT Critical Urban Freight Corridors: 142 miles statewide generally designated by MPOs - but total presumably adjudicated by ODOT State freight plans required, including 5-year fiscally constrained investment plan with priority projects, approximating a 5-year adjustable freight STIP Identifies use of formula freight funds Project list may be updated more often than 5-year state plan cycle Critical corridor designations also may be changed

Primary Highway Freight System Ohio Roadway Freight Network

National Highway & Multimodal Freight Goals National Freight Goals Policies, operational improvements & investments for: Economic competitiveness Congestion & bottleneck reduction Reduced costs and improved year-round reliability Productivity gain - especially by high value job generators Safety, security, efficiency, resilience: urban & rural Network state of good repair Advanced technology for safety, efficiency, reliability Economic efficiency & productivity of networks Improve short & long distance freight movement: across rural, rural-urban, port/airport/gateway connection Flexibility for multistate corridor planning & organization Reduce environmental impacts Avoid burdens to states & local governments Most linked to National Highway & Multimodal Freight Networks

NSFHP FASTLANE Program NSFHP is for shovel-ready projects, mostly of minimum $100 mil. size Construction can start 18 months from obligation Set asides: 25% for rural, 10% for small projects $25 mil. minimum grant; $5 mil. minimum for small projects FAST Act creates National Multimodal Freight Network Highway freight network plus Class I rail systems, major ports and airports, some other Not tied to NSFHP but apt to influence awards NSFHP favors multi-jurisdictional projects Multi-jurisdictionality not required, but NSFHP is the one program encouraging and supporting them Awards subject to congressional disapproval by joint resolution within 60-day notice period Implication: political coalition probably useful in competing for awards

FASTLANE Opened in 2016 $759 Mil. awarded to 18 projects in July 2016: $683 Mil. for 11 large projects (largest $165 Mil., most $40-$60 Mil.); $76 Mil. for 7 small projects; $266 Mil. for rural projects (35%); $200 Mil.+ for freight $40 Mil. large rural WI project only award in Great Lakes region Little evident multi-jurisdictionality General project eligibility: Highway freight projects carried out on the NHFN Highway or bridge projects carried out on National Highway System (NHS) Rail-highway grade crossing or grade-separation projects Freight intermodal, rail and port projects ($ dedicated & capped) 2016 FASTLANE applications something of a free-for-all; 2017 and beyond will be planned and deliberate The time to be planning, designing, and partnering is now

Thank You! WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff Freight & Logistics BryanJG@pbworld.com