RFP Patient Experience 2/28/ Questions & Answers

Similar documents
January 8, NCQA Department 4038 Washington, DC

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) #HM-R6-RFQ1 2018/2019 Highway Maintenance Agreements Prequalification RESPONSES TO RESPONDENT QUESTIONS SUMMARY #1

3. Why is California taking the lead in this area? 4. Is this just a California initiative? Aren t ACOs important throughout the country?

Medicare Data Solutions RFP FAQ

To: All Interested Bidders Re: RFP # 09-X CONTRACTED SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE CHILDREN S SYSTEM OF CARE ADDENDUM #2

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Performance Feedback Fact Sheet

Request for Proposals. Michigan Early Childhood Professionals Core Knowledge and Core Competencies

Coaching, Conflict Resolution, Consulting and/or Training Services RFP Questions & Responses to RFP: P.M.

CITY OF WAUSAU REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SALARY (PAY RANGE MATURATION) STUDY

2018 Final Rule from CMS for. Alternative Payment Models

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL: WIOA Integrated Data Systems Report

Request for Proposals: Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Pilot Project

Special Education Sexual Health Education Training Fall 2017

Via Electronic Submission ( April 5, 2013

RFP Restructuring Advisory Committee: Water and Sewer Question and Answer. Question Cut-Off 2/13/17

Mississippi First on behalf of Teen Health Mississippi

Youth Service Elements:

PECO CHP Call for Projects ( CfP ) Bidders Webinar Presented on September 19, 2017

Addendum 3 publishes and answers questions related to the Request for Qualifications ( RFQ ) issued on November 24, 2014:

COLORADO MULTI-PAYER COLLABORATIVE

Section 4 Adult Education and Literacy. Introduction. Current Operations

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

The New York State Practice Transformation Network (NYSPTN)

Request for Proposals (RFP) Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation RFP No IVV-B ADDENDUM NO.

APPLICATION INFORMATION: 1. All five sections of the application must be completed.

Developing Staff and Resource Infrastructure to Support Value-Based Reimbursement. NCHICA Annual Conference 2016

Request for Proposal (RFP) Medical and Dental Supplies RFP No MD-S ADDENDUM NO. 1. July 12, 2016

ADVERTISEMENT FOR QUALIFICATIONS CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF SHELBY MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN JOB ANALYSIS AND COMPENSATION STUDY

Washington State Medicaid Transformation Project (MTP) demonstration

State of Vermont Department of Education Request for Proposal Due April 22, 2011

ADDENDUM 2 TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 663-BC WORKDAY HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND WORKDAY FINANCIAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION CONSULTANTS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For CEO Search Listening Sessions Bid Number: March 22, 2019

Medicare Data Solutions RFP FAQ

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS AMGA 2017 ANNUAL CONFERENCE March 22-25, 2017, Gaylord Texan, Grapevine, TX

Request For Proposal. Interactive Projectors

Subcontractor Pre-Qualification Form

Central New York Care Collaborative (CNYCC)

Association of Energy Services Professionals (AESP) Request for Proposal Market Research Services

HEDIS is a registered trademark of the National Committee for Quality Assurance.

Innovative Employer Benefits Strategies and the Business Value of Health

MACRA Year 2 Moving out of the Transition Period and Into Reality February 16, 2018

Sec Short title; finding. Sec Authority to assess and use drug fees. Sec Reauthorization; reporting requirements.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Quality Measurement to Enhance Care

Addendum No. 2 February 19, 2014 City University Construction Fund Engineering Design Services Requirements Contracts RFQ Project No.

June 20, 2016 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL STRATEGIC PLANNING CONSULTANT

CALL FOR COMBINED HEAT AND POWER (CHP) PROJECTS. Program Guide

Date: Telephone: Company Name: Address: City: State: Zip Code: Contact Person: Title: Authorized Signature:

March 10, 2016 by 4:00 p.m. February 11, 2016 by 4:00 p.m. RFP-16104

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Audit and Tax Services ISSUED April 24, 2015 RFP No

Request for Qualifications. Career Pathways for English Language Learners. April 21, 2014

Ready for a new EHR?

Vendor Questions & Answers following RFP

PUNJAB SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FUND. Request for Proposal

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Roosevelt County. INVITATION FOR BID No CRUSHED CALICHE

Mentor-Protégé Program

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

JBC Facilitated Mentorship Program

Scoring of Qualified Registry and QCDR Submissions to Quality Payment Program in Year 1 (2017)

Amendment One to the Decision Support System Request for Information RFI Questions and Answers and Response Date Change

City Of Hammond Purchasing Department PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY FOR THE CITY OF HAMMOND RFP 17-06

Fulton, Montgomery and Schoharie Counties Workforce Development Board, Inc. On behalf of the Greater Capital Region Workforce Investment Boards

Addendum 2 to DOH Deletions are indicated by strikethrough or reference. Additions, updates or replacements are indicated by highlighting.

School Risk Assessment

PEDO PAKHTUNKHWA ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATON. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, PAKISTAN

Massachusetts Clean Energy Center Request for Proposals (RFP): Moon Island Engineering Design Consultant

Request for Proposal For: 2018 American Bar Association Temporary Services

Request for Proposals: Tax Increment Financing District Application Services Response Date: December 11, 2009, 2:00 PM

RFP No C020 Employee Engagement and Inclusion Survey Program for the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority

A cost analysis is required for any negotiated (non competitive) contract procurement on behalf of any University program, if:

Request for Proposal

On behalf of the Greater Capital Region Workforce Investment Boards

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR STRATEGIC VISIONING AND PLANNING

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS AUDIT

As indicated above, the Department s responses are not final, official or binding.

Appendix K. What scope of work is to be included in the Estimated Hourly Rate?

Fulton, Montgomery and Schoharie Counties Workforce Development Board, Inc. On behalf of the Greater Capital Region Workforce Investment Boards

Thank you for the submission of the State Health System Innovation Plan (SHSIP) for the SIM Model Design Cooperative Agreement on April 29, 2016.

On behalf of the Greater Capital Region Workforce Investment Boards

SUBMITTING YOUR 2018 MIPS DATA: ADVICE FOR SOLO AND SMALL GROUP PRACTICES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For Comprehensive Compensation and Job Analysis Study for

RFP Virtual Assistant/ChatBot Platform Questions and Answers

Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) Statewide Travel Management System ITN No D. Questions and Answers ITN Amendments

Navigating the 2017 MIPS Roadmap FALCON PHYSICIAN

BERRYESSA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 1376 PIEDMONT RD SAN JOSE, CA OFC FAX

BOROUGH OF BERLIN. Municipal Planning Board Engineer. Term: January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018.

Building a Patient Centered Home

EAST AFRICA TRADE AND INVESTMENT HUB REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) RFP-NAI Payroll & Employee Benefits Management Services

Request for Proposal RFP # National Data Consultant, India - Equal Measures FY18

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR STRATEGIC VISIONING AND PLANNING

There are Four areas in the systems transformation process (1) assessment, (2) planning, (3) implementation, and (4) evaluation.

Mustang Substation Bank I Replacement Project MAJ 15-SP5054

St. Lucie Public Schools

Creating a MIPS Success Roadmap

Request for Proposals Triennial Performance Audit of Public Transit Systems and The Council of Governments in San Joaquin County

Transcription:

Questions & Answers 1. Page 30 of the RFP (Paragraph 1.8) states that the successful bidder will work with up to 120 practices and 3 ACOs, and will survey patients from these practices using the CAHPS PCMH survey protocol. How many practices should we assume in total for this effort, including the practices that are part of the 3 ACOs (we are assuming that the total number of practices to be included would be greater than 120 when we add in the practices that are in the ACOs)? Answer: Bidders should assume up to 120 practices in total. 2. NCQA guidelines specify varying levels of sample size based on the number of clinicians in a practice. For instance, if a practice has 1 clinician, the required sample size of patients to be surveyed is 128 but if a practice has 4 to 9 clinicians, the required sample size is 343. Accordingly, can you provide the distribution of the total number of practices to be included in the research by their size (i.e., how many practices are in each size category: # of clinicians = 1, 2-3, 4-9, 10-13, 14-19, 20-28, 29 or more)? This information is necessary for us to estimate the total sample size required for this research. Answer: Of 110 potential practices as of December 31, 2013, it appears that: 10 practices have 1 provider 31 practices have 2-3 providers 61 practices have 4-9 providers 3 practices have 10-13 providers 4 practices have 14-19 providers 1 practice has 20-28 providers 3. The RFP mentions recruiting adult, family and pediatric primary care practices (Paragraph 1.8, Page 30). Of the total practices to be included, how many are pediatric, how many are adult, and how many are family? Answer: Based on available information, it appears that about 60% of practices are family practices, 20% are pediatric practices, and 20% are internal medicine practices. 4. Related to Point 3 above, for family practices, do we need to survey both adult and pediatric populations? If so, can you provide the breakdown of providers by patient type within each of those practices? Note that according to NCQA guidelines, family practices may choose to survey only one population - adult or pediatric. Answer: Family practices will determine whether they survey adult populations only, or adult and pediatric populations. They will not be required to survey both adult and pediatric populations. 5. Are any of the funds for this research federally sourced? This impacts our budgeting process. Answer: Funds for this project are federally sourced. There is a 10% indirect cost limit for this Page 1 of 8

federal funding. More information about the federal funds can be found at: http://innovation.cms.gov/files/x/stateinnovation_foa.pdf. 6. The deliverables timeline on Page 32 lists Submission to NCQA on 11/30/2014 and 11/30/2015. According to NCQA guidelines, the Fall reporting period is September 8-22. Please confirm that we can correct the dates to 9/8-22 and make any corresponding adjustments to the schedule if need be? Answer: The submission dates should be corrected to September 8-22; the State will make technical corrections to the RFP. 7. On Page 40, Summary of Funds, our organization has hundreds of contracts and sources of funding. Would it be acceptable to include examples of these on the Summary of Funds form or are vendors required to provide all sources of funds? Answer: It is acceptable for bidders to include examples of contracts. 8. Please confirm that the Schedule A: Budget Submittal Form, as well as Schedules B, C and D are not required to be submitted in a separately sealed envelope and can be included in the proposal package. Answer: Schedules A, B, C and D can be included in the proposal package. 9. Given the potential benefits of contracting with an in-state vendor experienced in Vermont's health care landscape, systems, and policies, will the Department of Vermont Health Access consider contracting with a vendor that is not currently a Certified Vendor of CAHPS PCMH if their corporate capabilities demonstrate experience and expertise in conducting the scope of work outlined in the Patient Education request for proposals? Or, is current Certified Vendor of CAHPS PCMH status an eligibility requirement for bidders? Answer: The successful bidder will need to demonstrate that it is capable of obtaining NCQA vendor certification for CAHPS PCMH prior to fielding the surveys. 10. Page 44 of 45, Schedule A: Summary of Costs, Form A Detailed Instructions, Line 7-Fringe Benefits indicates (max 25-35%). Please clarify if this is an example or an indication of maximum fringe benefits allowed under this contract. Answer: Fringe benefits are usually applicable to direct salaries and wages. Provide information on the rate of fringe benefits used and the basis for their calculation. If a fringe benefit rate is not used, itemize how the fringe benefit amount is computed. 11. Page 11 of 45, Contract Development, 3.1 Contract Term indicates Tentatively, the period of performance of the work to be performed as a result of this RFP is April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015. This is in conflict with dates provided in Chapter 3, Technical Proposal/Program Specifications. On page 30 of 45, Technical Proposal 1.8 the proposal indicates Data will be collected in spring of 2014 and 2015 and on page 31 Page 2 of 8

of 45, 1.9 of the Technical Proposal, it is stated Data collected in 2015 will be analyzed and submitted to NCQA and the State in State Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015) and in Section 2, Performance Standards (Deliverables), all deliverables indicate two periods of data collection and reporting. What is the period of this contract and what period should the proposed budget cover? Answer: The end date of the contract will be extended to March 31, 2016. Also, the dates for State Fiscal Year 2016 are July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. The State will make technical corrections to the RFP for both of these items. 12. Page 4 of 45, 1.2 Schedule of Events, the final line (Commencement of Contract), lists Tuesday April 1, 2014 as commencement of contract. This is in conflict with dates provided in Chapter 3, Technical Proposal/Program Specifications. On page 31 of 45, in Section 2, Performance Standards (Deliverables), Method/Activity Patient Lists indicates lists are due 3/31/2014. How would a vendor Report the number of patients, adult and pediatric parents to be surveyed and the number of participating practices before the commencement of the contract? Answer: Patient lists will be due on 5/31/14. The State will make a technical correction to the RFP to reflect this change. 13. Page 30 of 45, 1.1 Technical Program, 1.8 states the successful bidder will work with the State and Blueprint, ACO and other provider payment reform leadership through Vermont to recruit adult, family, and pediatric primary care practices interested in assessing their patients experiences with care. a. Who will hold primary responsibility for recruitment? What will the bidder s role in recruitment be? Answer: The successful bidder will be responsible for conducting outreach to potential practices, describing the survey process, and identifying practices that decide to participate after the outreach and informational process. The State (including the Blueprint) and ACOs will explain the objectives of the survey and the funding support for practices, and will encourage practices to participate in the survey. b. Is there a defined recruitment period? If so, when will recruitment start and end? Again, it is listed on page 31 of 45, in Section 2, Performance Standards (Deliverables). Answer: Recruitment for the first year will end on 5/15/15. The successful bidder is expected to conduct outreach with first-year and additional practices for the second year. 14. Method/Activity Patient Lists indicates reports on lists are due 3/31/2014. This is in conflict with a contract start date of 4/1/2014. Answer: Patient lists will be due on 5/31/14. The State will make a technical correction to the RFP to reflect this change. Page 3 of 8

15. Page 30 of 45, 1.1 Technical Program, 1.8 states that the successful bidder will work with up to 120 practices. a. Are there a minimum number of practices required to participate? (e.g., what happens if only 60 practices choose to participate?) Answer: The State has not identified a minimum number of practices for this project. The State is funding the survey for the practices, measurement of patient experience is required for NCQA PCMH recognition, and NCQA PCMH recognition is required for practices that wish to participate in the Blueprint for Health (Vermont s advanced primary care practice program). b. Other than including practices that are part of the 3 ACOs, are there other parameters for what practices must be included (e.g., do you require equal representation of pediatric and adult practices, independent or owned practices, practices from all geographic areas of Vermont, practices participating/not participating in the Blueprint, etc.)? Answer: This project will be offered to all practices that participate in the Blueprint. Many of those practices will also participate in one of the three ACOs. There are no other requirements in terms of the proportion of pediatric vs. adult practices, or independent vs. owned practices. c. Do all practices have to be surveyed at the same time, or can data collection occur in several waves? Answer: The State anticipates that all practices will be surveyed at the same time. 16. Page 32 of 45, in Section 2, Performance Standards (Deliverables), Method/Activity Submission to NCQA indicates bidder will submit CAHPS PCMH results on behalf of the practices to NCQA on 11/30/2014. The bidder believes results are due in September. Has NCQA granted DVHA an extended data submission window? Answer: The submission dates should be corrected to September 8-22; the State will make technical corrections to the RFP. 17. Page 30 of 45, 1.1 Technical Program, 1.7 states It is likely that a small number of custom questions (fewer than 10) will be added to Vermont s CAHPS PCMH survey. Will these questions be close-ended/forced-choice or open-ended/write-ins? Answer: The custom questions will be close-ended/forced-choice. 18. Page 31 of 45, 1.1 Technical Program, 1.10 states that ACO, HSA, and statewide reports will include comparisons to applicable benchmarks. Will obtaining benchmark data be the bidder s responsibility or will DVHA be providing it? Answer: The successful bidder will be responsible for obtaining benchmark data. 19. Could DVHA provide a listing of the ACO, health service areas and practices as they align under each service area? Answer: DVHA can provide a list of Blueprint-participating practices by health service area (see Page 4 of 8

attached). ACOs have not yet finalized participation agreements for Vermont s Medicaid and Commercial Shared Savings Programs. 20. Could DVHA clarify the requirements of this section [Chapter 3, 1.4)? For instance, is it DVHA s intent to have the successful vendor taking in data from other vendors and analyzing those results? Also, how does the DVHA envision the successful vendor implementing a plan to analyze and report on the impact of the Blueprint, ACO Shared Savings Programs, and other payment and delivery system reforms on patient experience in primary care practices across the state what is the extent of this plan, what other data metrics will be provided and what other ACO or ACO like organizations will be involved? Answer: The intent is for the successful bidder to work with the State to develop a plan for using CAHPS PCMH to measure the impact of Vermont s key health care reforms on the experience of patients in primary care practices that participate in the Blueprint for Health. It is anticipated that CAHPS PCMH will be the source of data metrics for this project. It is possible that the successful bidder might be asked to assist the State in including patient experience results for practices that use different (but similar) CAHPS survey tools and/or vendors. Vermont currently has three ACOs that have indicated their intent to participate in the Medicaid and/or Commercial Shared Savings Programs. 21. Could you provide the Vermont CAHPS PCMH survey (or the Vermont custom questions) for our review in preparing our budget? Answer: The custom questions have not yet been finalized. As noted in the RFP, there will be about 10 custom questions. They will be similar to questions in other CAHPS surveys. 22. You mentioned allowing practices who are currently working with a vendor; are you going to continue allowing that? What is DVHA s plan for incorporating practices that may already be working with a vendor who is not selected by DVHA? Answer: Practices will be encouraged to participate with the selected vendor if they are using the PCMH CAHPS survey, and the State will pay for the survey if fielded by the selected vendor. If practices choose to use another vendor, the State will explore the potential for including the results with the reporting developed under this RFP. 23. Will DVHA pay, through this requisition, for all participating practices or will the practice be expected to contract with the selected vendor? Will the State also pay for the survey with a vendor not selected by the State? Answer: The State will not pay for the survey for practices that choose to use another vendor. 24. Will DVHA offer any type of incentive for practices to participate? Answer: The State is funding the survey for the practices, measurement of patient experience is required for NCQA PCMH recognition, and NCQA PCMH recognition is required for practices that Page 5 of 8

wish to participate in the Blueprint for Health (Vermont s advanced primary care practice program). 25. Please specify which section of the proposal this information should be detailed under [Chapter 3]. Also, please specify what you expect to be addressed in response to 3.1.1 through 3.1.10. Answer: Section 1.7.8.4 Proposal Format, outlines the requirement for proper proposal format. 26. What is the purpose of this form [Appendix A, Rate Sheet Form] in context of this scope of work? When, beyond the project budget, does DVHA anticipate utilizing a daily rate? Also, should such a form be included for multiple labor categories or only one? Answer: The Rate Sheet Form shall be deleted in its entirety due to bidders submitting a Schedule A: Summary of Costs. 27. What is your organization currently doing to understand the patient experience? Answer: The State has covered the costs of fielding patient experience surveys for some primary care practices that participate in the Blueprint for Health. 28. Beyond NCQA reporting will there be a need for reporting any data to other entities such as CMS or PQRS? Answer: It is possible that the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) or its evaluators will request the results of the survey. 29. Is your ACO a CMS sponsored ACO? Answer: All three of Vermont s ACOs have been approved for participation in the Medicare Shared Savings Program. However, the focus of this RFP is to measure patient experience with Vermont s Commercial and Medicare Shared Savings Programs. 30. Is DVHA hoping to obtain Distinction in Patient Experience Reporting as part of the NCQA PCMH certification? Answer: Bidders should include this in their proposals if they think it would benefit the State. 31. Will the survey use the PCMH adult or child versions or both? Answer: The State anticipates that both the adult and child surveys will be used, depending on the practice. Family practices will determine whether they survey adult populations only, or adult and pediatric populations. They will not be required to survey both adult and pediatric populations. Page 6 of 8

32. Attachment D in the requisition is missing, should there be an Attachment D? Answer: This Request for Proposal does not have an Attachment D. 33. The RFP says that bidders had to submit a letter of intent by Monday the 10th. Will the State still accept bids even if the bidders didn't submit a letter of intent? Answer: The State has decided to waive the requirement for a Letter of Intent. 34. Do you have an estimate on the number of providers within the 120 practices and 3 ACOs? Answer: The State estimates that there are approximately 630 providers in the potential primary care practices. a. Would you accept a solution that is Internet-submission only? Answer: Survey protocols should comply with NCQA guidelines. In their proposals, bidders should outline the survey methods that they believe would best meet the goals of the State. 35. What are the State s approaches for internet and mail fielding of the survey? What is your approach to completing surveys via the internet? Answer: Survey protocols should comply with NCQA guidelines. In their proposals, bidders should outline the survey methods that they believe would best meet the goals of the State. 36. What other modes are going to be acceptable other than mail and Internet? Is a phone survey possible? Answer: Survey protocols should comply with NCQA guidelines. In their proposals, bidders should outline the survey methods that they believe would best meet the goals of the State. 37. When we receive the distribution of practices and sizes, is it possible to receive additional information regarding practices (i.e., practices by name and number of physicians in each practice)? Answer: No. 38. Is there an expectation for English and Spanish for all practices? Answer: No. 39. On Page 10, under Bidder s Capacity to Perform, the second bullet reads indicate how this program fits into the organization s structure. Can you expand on that and please specify what you are looking for? Page 7 of 8

Answer: Applicants should describe their organizational capacity to perform the work described in this RFP and how that fits in with the overall organization. 40. The minimum period of time the survey can be fielded for is 60 days. Is that your expectation for this survey? Answer: Survey protocols should comply with NCQA guidelines. 41. If the State does not meet the February 28 deadline for posting answers to questions resulting from this RFP, will it extend the deadline for submission of proposals? Answer: The State does not intend to take additional time to post the questions and answers, and therefore does not intend to extend the deadline for submission of proposals. 42. Do practices have email addresses for their patients? Answer: The State does not know if practices have patient e-mail addresses. 43. I have a question about the deliverables, about the reports at the end of the process. There are reports at a number of different levels here for the practices, the ACOs, health service areas. There are individual levels, practice levels, as well as aggregate levels. I was wondering who would be coordinating the development process of all of those reports. Would it be the State who would be coordinating the design and development of those reports? Answer: Bidders should anticipate involvement from the State (including from State initiatives such as the Blueprint for Health) and potential involvement from ACOs. Bidders should anticipate a collaborative approach between the successful bidder and all of these entities. Page 8 of 8