Drinking Water Treatment Overview Filtration and Disinfection

Similar documents
Pathogens in Water. Monitoring, Control and Technologies Available for Treatment. Prepared by; Paul O Callaghan M.Sc. Dr.

TREATMENT OF WATER. A.Sateesh Chemist State Level Laboratory

Procedure For Disinfection Of Drinking Water In Ontario

Procedure for Disinfection of Drinking Water in Ontario

Comparison of Plant Processes and Operations for Producing Potable Water from the Available Source Water

Disinfection and Disinfection Byproducts (DBP)

WEFTEC.06. Lake Okeechobee, Actiflo, peroxone, surface water, Cyanobacteria

Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

Treatment Processes for Potable Water

Let there be light! - Introduction to USEPA's UV Design Guidance Manual

Overview Increased Increased federal emphasis emphasis on on filter filter performance Virginia s emphasis emphasis on

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 631. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OPERATION SUBCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

Index. AWWA see American Water Works Association AWWARF see American Water Works Association Research Foundation

Natural organic matter in drinking water Ontario Water Works Association Water Treatment Seminar March 20, 2018

Written submission from Scottish Water

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LECTURE 3: WATER TREATMENT MISS NOR AIDA YUSOFF

DISCUSSION PAPER. 1 Introduction. 2 Existing Legislation and Guidelines

Module 1 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM BASIC OPERATIONS

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 631. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OPERATION SUBCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

ALTERNATIVE WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES

Treatment of all source water influent & effluent for user application, be it commercial, industrial, domestic, to defined & required standards.

Riverbank Filtration A Surface-Water Perspective

J.K. ENGINEERING LTD. CONSULTING * RESEARCH * DEVELOPMENT

Submerged Membranes to Replace Media Filters to Increase Capacity 4X for a Small Community. Richard Stratton, PE HDR Engineering, Inc.

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 631. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OPERATION SUBCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

Health Based Targets Application of Log Reduction Values. Phillip Fasham Manager Water Quality Regulations and Verification

ADVANCES IN UV TECHNOLOGY FOR 4-LOG VIRUS DISINFECTION OF GROUNDWATER. Scott Bindner OWWA Annual Conference May 2014

Teacher s information - Lesson 3: Water disinfection

DW Module 23: Organic Removal Answer Key

Water Quality - Condensed Version 1999

WATER AND WASTEWATER FACILITY CLASSIFICATION APPLICATION FORM

PNW AWWA Conference 2009 Todd Reynolds, PE, BCEE

Module 7 Water Treatment for Domestic Water Supplies. Water Treatment for Domestic Water Supplies

Chlorate Working Group

Disinfection By-Products Reduction and SCADA Evaluation and WTP Sludge Removal System and Dewatering Facility

THE COMAG SYSTEM FOR ENHANCED PRIMARY AND TERTIARY TREATMENT

Excalibur Ultraviolet Sterilizers Choose Bacteria-free Water

System Assessment Reports Information Sessions. January 2013

Some Standard Membranes: Filmtec Membrane, Hydronatics Membrane, Torry membrane and Koch Membrane.

Drinking Water. Charles J. Devine, III, MD

Class Environmental Assessment for Burloak Water Purification Plant Phase 2 Expansion Public Information Centre No.1

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

EXCALIBUR - ULTRAVIOLET STERILIZERS. When performance & value matters.

PERFORMANCE AND RESIDUAL MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF 5 MGD MEMBRANE WATER PLANT. Presented by: Stephen P. Dorman, P.E.

2014 Ontario Water Works Conference May 4-7 th, 2014 London, Ontario. Methods for evaluating pathogen log removal in a water treatment plant

MEMBRANE BIO-REACTOR. Prashanth N 1 1. INTRODUCION

Ultraviolet Light for Disinfection of Wastewater. Tom O Connor, PE H 2 O C Engineering

Pathogen Removal Mechanisms and Pathogen Credits in MBR-Based Potable Reuse Trains

OPERATOR CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION REGISTRATION PA Certification to Operate Water or Wastewater Systems PRINT CLEARLY

Welcome! Regulations Basics Session #4 Surface Water Treatment

Water Shed Protection Against Wild Fire. Building a water system resilient to fire

Science Exploration. DHRITI BHATTACHARJEE Class : VII/C Roll No : 31

Trident. Package Water Treatment System

Water supplied by Marafiq does not meet the process requirements.

Ultrafiltration Technical Manual

OPTIMISATION OF IMAGE FLAT WATER TREATMENT PLANT. Tony Humphries. Tony Humphries, Operator, SEQ Water

POREX Tubular Membrane Filter Modules For Metal Contaminated Wastewater Treatment & Reclamation

Issues. Issues (cont.) A multiple barriers approach is required to provide potable water

Government Center Water Treatment Plant Kamphaeng Phet Province, Thailand

David Manz, Ph.D., P. Eng., P. Ag. VP Marketing and Product Development, Oasis Filter International Ltd., Calgary, Alberta.

Wastewater Examinations

Lowering The Total Cost Of Operation

Wastewater Examinations

Drinking Water Treatment Optimization Tools

Ultrafiltration with pre-coagulation in drinking water production Literature review

Is your water truly clean?

DOW Ultrafiltration. Case History. DOW Ultrafiltration Modules Protect Reverse Osmosis System from High Iron

Drinking Water Production Using Moving Bed Filtration

CLASS A APPROVAL PROCESS FOR THE WODONGA WATER RECYCLING SCHEME. Ian Reimers. North East Water

Environmental Management Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER DIVISION - WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Advanced disinfection of wastewater ponds effluent by UV irradiation. T. Fuhrmann and K.-U. Rudolph

Walkerton Clean Water Centre Fall Small Systems Seminar. Water Quality Challenges in Small Drinking Water Systems in Southern Ontario

GROUNDWATER FILTRATION BASICS MARCH 2016

SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS OPTIMIZATION

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Twin Towers Office Bldg., 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida

Water Quality Parameters

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 631. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OPERATION SUBCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

Filtration / UV Disinfection 4 Log Validated Water Treatment

Multiple Disinfectant Barriers Within A Multiple Barrier System: A New Drinking Water Paradigm for Public Health Protection

Where does drinking water come from?

Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi (India) CVL722 (Sem1, ) (Dr. Arun Kumar;

Development of a utility-based strategy for achieving microbiologically safe drinking water

APPLICATION FORM AND GUIDE FOR A NEW OR RENEWED APPROVAL OF A MUNICIPAL WATERWORKS SYSTEM

Chemical Precipitation and Ballasted Flocculation

Total Water Management in Thermal Power Station By Mr. N. Ramachandran - Associate Vice President (Technology)

CHARECTERIZATION OF SEWAGE AND DESIGN OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

Air Connection on Rack. Filtrate Connection on Rack

Water Treatment Overview. Gabe Sasser December 2016

Zero Liquid Discharge Project Extends Potable Water Supplies

BOARD OF CERTIFICATION OF OPERATORS OF DRINKING WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES POLICY FOR TRAINING REQUIREMENTS TO SIT FOR EXAMS

Summary of Pilot Plant Results and Preliminary Recommendations

Coagulation and Flocculation: Color Removal

Drinking Water Disinfection For Operators, Town Councils, and LSD Committees

The Application of Flat Ultra-Filtration for Rainwater Reuse

Wastewater Treatment Works... The Basics

Radioactive Water Treatment at a United States. John C Beckman, US Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District, Baltimore, MD 21201

Reclamation of Sand Filter Backwash Effluent using HYDRAcap LD Capillary UF Membrane Technology

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

Membrane Systems. Featuring Aqua MultiBore Membranes

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

Transcription:

Drinking Water Treatment Overview Filtration and Disinfection April 16 th, 2009 Yousry Hamdy, M.Sc., P.Eng Nicolás s Peleato, EIT 1

Table of Contents Introduction Filtration Cartridge filters Chemical assisted filtration Slow sand filters Diatomaceous earth Activated carbon Membrane filters Disinfection Chlorine Chloramines Ultraviolet Radiation 2

Introduction Purpose of Treatment The objective is to provide safe drinking water to consumers that meet the Provincial Drinking Water Quality Standards (O.Reg( O.Reg.. 169/03) Treatment of source water is aimed at: Achieving: (O.Reg( 170) 4 log removal for viruses, 3 log removal for Giardia lamblia, 2 log removal of Cryptosporidium Reduction of harmful chemical compounds to meet the Standards 3

Introduction Treatment Elements Treatment can generally be broken up into three aspects Filtration Physically removes contaminants, physical impurities, micro-organisms organisms Primary Disinfection Inactivates micro-organisms organisms Secondary Disinfection Ensures continual disinfection and prevents the re-growth of micro-organisms organisms during distribution 4

Cartridge Filters Crypt. Credit 2-log Giardia Credit 2-log Virus Credit 0 Small in-line filters which physically block particulates and contaminants Typical 5 micron pore size (can be less) Can be constructed from several materials, Ceramics Wool, paper, woven fibers Carbon Depending on the filter material they are either disposable or can be washed and reused 5

Cartridge Filters Crypt. Credit 2-log Giardia Credit 2-log Virus Credit 0 Some also contain ion exchange resins for reduction of aqueous ions (iron, lead, copper, etc.) Cartridge Housing 6

Cartridge Filters Crypt. Credit 2-log Giardia Credit 2+ log Virus Credit 0 To claim removal credits, Raw water must have turbidity less than 5 NTU, colour less than 5 TCU Use filter elements and housing certified for surrogate particle removal evaluation in accordance with testing procedures and manufacturing quality control specified in ANSI/NSF Standard 53 or equivalent; 7

Cartridge Filters Crypt. Credit 2-log Giardia Credit 2+ log Virus Credit 0 To claim removal credits (cont d), Ensure that differential pressures across the filter medium do not exceed manufacturer s rating and materials coming in contact with water conform to ANSI/NSF Standard 61. Turbidity of treated water should be at least monitored daily (continuous recommended) Monitoring results should indicate turbidity less than 0.2 NTU for 95% of measurements in a month 8

Cartridge Filters Crypt. Credit 2-log Giardia Credit 2+ log Virus Credit 0 Advantages: Easy to operate and maintain Issues: Only suitable for low turbidity sources Cartridges can foul quickly and need to be replaced 9

Chemical Assisted Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit 2.5-log The physical filtration process is preceded by flocculation/coagulation where a chemical allows for suspended particles to aggregate and form a larger particle Process is initiated by the addition of a flocculant, Aluminum sulfate (Alum) Ferric sulfate Various polymers Others 10

Chemical Assisted Four steps to the process Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit 2.5-log Coagulation Flocculation Sedimentation Filtration Untreated Water Addition of flocculant/coagulant Charges Particles Flocs Water are is then on aggregate allowed suspended typically to into settle passed particles flocs by (aided gravity. through are by neutralized The sand the process chemical) bed to filters allow can to be them to Gentle sped remove aggregate up mixing any by using remaining as to inclined promote flocs settling and floc provides growth plates. without further breaking filtration Rapid them Filtration mixing process to eliminate is generally concentration considered gradients rapid, > 4 m/h velocity 11

Chemical Assisted Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit 2.5-log Advantages: Highly effective filtration process Flow rate through filters is high Disadvantages: High operational duty between adjusting the flocculation/coagulation processes and filter backwash Large equipment footprint 12

Chemical Assisted Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit 2.5-log To be effective, Chemical coagulant/flocculant has to be used at all times and dosage must be adjusted in response to raw water quality fluctuations Sand filters must be backwashed regularly Filtrate turbidity must be continuously monitored Filtered water should be less than 0.3 NTU for 95% of the measurements each month 13

Direct Filtration Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit 1.0-log The sedimentation step of chemically assisted filtration can be skipped and is then considered direct filtration Only used when turbidity is less than 20 NTU Must meet criteria for chemical assisted filtration to claim credits. 14

Direct Filtration Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit 1.0-log Advantages: Effective filtration process Flow rate through filters is reasonably high Need for a sedimentation tank (or time) is eliminated Disadvantages: High operational duty between adjusting the flocculation/coagulation processes and filter backwash Only suitable for low turbidity waters which are seasonally consistent 15

Slow Sand Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit The slow sand filtration is both a physical and biological process Slow sand filters differ from rapid sand filters, Velocities of 0.1 0.4 m/s Microbial growth is promoted at the top of the filter Backwashing procedures cannot be carried out Cleaning is typically performed by removing and discarding the top layer of sand Several weeks are needed to allow for the microbial layer to form (before filter can be used) 16

Slow Sand Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit To be effective, An active biological layer must be maintained The filter must be cleaned regularly Filtrate turbidity must be monitored Filtered water should be less than 1 NTU for 95% of the measurements in a month 17

Slow Sand Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit Advantages: Low cost Simple operation, reliable Does not require extensive control Issues: Not suitable for high turbidity waters Filter surface needs regular maintenance Large equipment footprint due to low flow rate 18

Diatomaceous Earth Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit 1.0-log Skeletal remains of small single celled organisms (diatoms) Used as filter media A thin layer of DE is formed on a septum and water is passed through DE is well suited for small systems because, Low cost Chemical coagulation/flocculation is not needed 19

Diatomaceous Earth Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit 1.0-log 20

Diatomaceous Earth Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit 1.0-log To be effective, A minimum thickness of the pre-coat must be maintained (32mm) Discharge or recycle water involved in the pre-coat process Continuously monitor filtrate turbidity Filtered water must be less than 1.0 NTU for 95% of the measurements in a month 21

Diatomaceous Earth Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit Virus Credit 1.0-log Advantages: Effective filtration process Simple to operate Low initial capital cost Issues: Only suitable for source waters of low turbidity and bacterial counts (turbidity < 20 NTU) Potentially difficult to maintain pre-coat 22

Membrane Filtration Involves passing water through a thin synthetic semi-permeable membrane Many different types generally categorized by their selectivity (size of retained particles) Micro-filtration Ultra-filtration Nano-filtration Reverse Osmosis Crypt. Credit Giardia Credit - Virus Credit > 100 nm > 10 nm > 1 nm < 1 nm 3.0-log+ 2-3 log Can require high pressures to achieve reasonable flow rates (depends on type of membrane) 23

Membrane Filtration Crypt. Credit 3.0-log+ Giardia Credit - Virus Credit 2-3 log Removal capability depend on the manufacturer and type of membrane (must be certified) To be effective, The membrane must be backwashed or cleaned regularly Monitor membrane integrity (through particle count, pressure decay measurements, etc.) Continuously monitor filtrate turbidity Filtered water must be less than 0.1 NTU (99% of the time) 24

Membrane Filtration Crypt. Credit 3.0-log+ Giardia Credit - Virus Credit 2-3 log Advantages: Small equipment footprint Automated operation Issues: Membrane fouling can be a significant problem depending on the quality of source water 25

Activated Carbon Crypt. Credit - Giardia Credit - Virus Credit - A type of filter media that can be used (partially or fully) in bed filters, cartridge filters, or as a powder Processed carbon which results in a structure with very high surface area 1 g of activated carbon has a surface area of apprx. 500 m 2 Adsorbs particulates, metal ions, micro-organisms organisms Must be recharged or replaced periodically 26

Activated Carbon Crypt. Credit - Giardia Credit - Virus Credit - Sometimes added in powdered format (PAC) during seasonal taste and odour events. PAC adsorbs contaminants and can then be filtered 27

Activated Carbon Crypt. Credit - Giardia Credit - Virus Credit - Advantages: Powerful non-selective adsorbent Can be recycled and reused Issues: Must be recharged periodically More expensive than typical medias 28

Summary Technology Chemical assisted filtration Log Removal Credit Giardia Viruses Crypto. 2.5 2 2 Direct filtration 2 1 2 Slow Sand filtration 2 2 2 DE filtration 2 1 2 Membrane 3+ 0-2 2 Cartridge filters 2+ 0 2 29

Disinfection Chlorine Most common method of disinfecting water Can be applied by using, Chlorine gas Sodium hypochlorite Calcium hypochlorite Electrochemical process Disinfection is caused by free chlorine 30

Disinfection Chlorine Inactivates a broad range of pathogens through oxidation Can be considered both a primary and secondary disinfectant since free chlorine persists for extended periods of time The extent of disinfection is determined by the concentration of residual chlorine and the amount of time it is in contact with the water. Contact chambers are used to increase contact time Log credits calculated through the CT disinfection concept 31

Disinfection Chlorine CT disinfection concept CT = concentration (mg/l) x contact time (minutes) Disinfectant residual concentration is measured at the end of a treatment step CT requirement table example (virus inactivation) Water Temperature 5 15 25 CT values for various log credits 2 log 4 2 1 (ph = 6-9) 3 log 6 3 1 4 log 8 4 2 32

Disinfection Chlorine Chlorine is effective at removing almost all pathogens and providing secondary disinfection Chlorine (gas) Cheapest based on available chlorine Very dangerous gas and must be handled with care Sodium hypochlorite (liquid solution) More expensive Easier to handle than gas (but still corrosive) 33

Disinfection Chlorine Calcium hypochlorite (solid) Very stable and can be stored for a year or more Corrosive Reaction between calcium hypochlorite and organic materials can generate enough heat to start a fire Readily absorbs moisture and releases chlorine gas 34

Disinfection Chloramination Combination of chlorine and ammonia Can form several species of chloramines; however monochloramine is desirable Promoted using mass ratio of 4.5:1 (chlorine:ammonia( chlorine:ammonia) Not suitable for primary disinfection More persistent and less reactive than free chlorine, Better for large distribution systems Reduces number of disinfection by-products formed in distribution system 35

Disinfection Chloramination Advantages: Results in fewer DBPs formed in distribution system More persistent residual (good for distribution systems with high retention times) Issues: Weak disinfectant Disagreeable taste and odour 36

Disinfection Ultraviolet Radiation Application of UV radiation provides primary disinfection by inactivating the reproductive abilities of micro-organisms organisms Provides no residual (no secondary disinfectant) Disinfection depends on the intensity of the radiation, transmittance, and contact time Dose is calculated at a wavelength of 254nm Minimum of 40 mj/cm 2 (flux) 37

Disinfection Ultraviolet Radiation UV systems must be certified by the NSF, EPA, or equivalent organizations Systems must have an alarm and auto-shut off feature If dose falls below set-point If turbidity exceeds manufacturer standards causing low transmittance of UV 38

Disinfection Ultraviolet Radiation Pathogen E coli O157:H7 Cryptosporidium Giardia Adenovirus (type 15) Dose (mj/cm 2 ) required for various log inactivation credits 1 <2 <2 <10 40 2 <2 <2 ~10 80 3 2.5 <2 <20 122 4 4 <4 165 39

Disinfection Ultraviolet Radiation Advantages: Produces no known toxic residuals Requires very short contact times Easy to operate and maintain UV lamps only need to be replaced every one or two years Effective disinfectant Issues: Source water must have high transmittance at 254 nm 40