Example CVA: Overall Group

Similar documents
Small Group Assessment (SGA) Example

School Example. Prepared by. Barrett Values Centre

Customer Values Assessment Example

Religious/ Spiritual Organization Example

Spiritual Religious Example

Non-Governmental/ Non-profit Example

Utilities Industry Overview

Central Government Industry Overview

Retail Industry Overview

Local Government Overview

Manufacturing Industry Overview

Telecoms Industry Overview

Non Profit Industry Overview

Fast Moving Consumer Goods Industry Overview

Banking & Finance Industry Overview

Description of the Values Diagrams & Tables

Centers for Spiritual Living: Assessment Dialog For Councils & the Field. August 12, 2014

ACCOUNTABILITY WHAT WE LL TALK ABOUT WHAT WE LL TALK ABOUT IF EVERYONE WANTS IT, WHY IS IT SO HARD TO GET?

What is Culture? Culture assessment and change management questions you should be asking yourself. Culture Change Takes Time and Patience

Culture assessment and change management questions you should be asking yourself

Leadership Development Report: Jane Leader

Cultural Transformation vs Change Richard Barrett

Ethics & Compliance. Who Are We? Susan Du Becker. Ruth Steinholtz. Lawyer no more Engineer Business & Cultural SME Star Trek Fan!

Cultural Capital. Measuring and mobilizing organizational culture for competitive advantage

Merger/ Compatibility Report Company A & Company B

Coaching for Cultural Transformation

Peeling back the layers. Accountability: The Key to Culture Alignment

The Seven Levels of Government/ Municipal Agency Consciousness

HCCA Culture Matters! April 2013

Improving Your Business Through Values

Engagement and Culture: Engaging Talent in Turbulent Times

Quality and Excellence in Higher Education. Mike Pupius Director, Centre for Integral Excellence Sheffield Hallam University

REALISINGHUMAN POTENTIAL

Management Drives. Introduction

Values Based Leadership and Career Planning. Financial Management Institute Victoria British Columbia October 20, 2010 Danae Johnson, Ingrid Bergmann

LEADING MARKETING (60 Credits)

THE 22 nd ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE

UCA Synod of Victoria and Tasmania Key Results from Culture Survey 2015

The Seven Levels of Organisational Consciousness

The Seven Levels of Leadership Consciousness

Town of Cochrane Strategic Plan

SACMA. Sub title. 20 th May 2010

TEAM LEADERSHIP FOR TOTAL QUALITY TL/TQ PRINCIPLES & CONCEPTS PROGRAM MATERIALS

How to overcome barriers for innovations in organizations from the public sector

A Values-Based Approach to Cultural Resilience

Bank Leverages Cultural Transformation Tools

integrity. It is vital to be careful and take people seriously during difficult conversations.

EFQM MODEL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO ANY ORGANISATION

Are you prepared for this Challenge? The new COSO Enterprise Risk Management Framework

Effective Teamwork. Werner Baumker Operations Director, Co-Mission

Akron SHRM Conference Wellbeing and Engagement ALI PAYNE AUGUST 2016

Implementing Cultural Transformation: Building a Vision-Guided, Values-Driven Organization

Position description

The Quality Profession Challenge and ISO 9001:2015

HillFive Leader Lunch. from terrawatt2terrabyte Zeist, 15. March, 2018

The Chicken or the Egg - Value Propositions or SWOT?

Self-evaluation form Form 1: Research and innovation actions Innovation actions Form 2: Coordination & support actions

aligning the organization with strategy, vision and values by Senn Delaney

NZ Police 2007 Employee Engagement Survey (Organisational Health Audit) Results Presentation

Society Time for Change

Values-Based Leadership: Leading from the Inside Out

UCISA Conference 2012

Learning Resources THE ACTION CYCLE

CAAT CLIMATE ASSESSMENT AND AUDIT TOOL

The Performance Prism

EFQM Ireland Excellence Recognition. George Wilson Jan 17

steps for brand clarity + authenticity mezzanine.co transformation application of brand expression expression expression expression expression

The Future of Wellness at Work

The Future of Wellness at Work

Transforming Healthcare Organizations. Healthier Workers. Healthier Leaders. Healthier Organizations.

Presentation. Values Create Value. Why Corporate Values Matter. Berlin 14 th October 2004

QUALITY MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES

CONCLUSIONS, LIMITATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ireap G TM roup Report i R E A PTM

Engaging Health Staff. An Introduction

An assessment of organisational values, culture and performance in Cape Town s primary healthcare services

Managers Play a Key Role in Transforming the Fear and Uncertainty of a Layoff into Trust By Kevin Scheid

TDP TM Team Diagnostic Profiler

2015 HRPA Conference 5 Stages of Organizational Life: from unconsciousness to authenticity

Council Policy. Community & Stakeholder Engagement Policy Council policy title: Executive Manager Communications, Customer and Cultural Services

HELPING OTHERS THROUGH CHANGE

Organisational Flexibility:

Purpose of the Effective Board Governance Observation Diagnostic

GREATER ACCOUNTABILITY

Empowerment The best way to become a World Class Organization By Diane Prange

Flexibility on what is delivered High

YOUR FUTURE WORKFORCE

Statutory Guidance for the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015

HUMAN RESOURCES STRATEGY HUMAN RESOURCES STRATEGIC PLAN

NAVIGATING CHANGE IN TIMES OF UNCERTAINTY PART II. Susan L. Newton Nonprofit Learning Center May, 2014

STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP ISSUES

IAEA Approach to Culture and Leadership for Safety

Measuring the Impact of Volunteering Alan Witchey Volunteer Center Director United Way of Central Indiana

6. IT Governance 2006

Five Steps to Aligning KPIs and Balanced Scorecards in Contact Centers

Strategic Plan

RE: February 1, Background. study is to inform. which. values match. up. Positive. retention and. department to reach. Subgroups. Female.

Ban The Performance. Appraisal. By CEO Iggy Tan. Mob: Ban The Performance Appraisal

Stages of Organisational Consciousness: Part II

OUR PEOPLE STRATEGY

Transcription:

Example CVA: Overall Group Prepared by Barrett Values Centre BARRETT VALUES CENTRE, IRS, IROS and CULTURAL ENTROPY are registered trademarks of Barrett Values Centre, LLC.

Personal & Current Culture Alignment Values Matches: 0 or more. People are able to bring themselves to work. Cultural Entropy: 22% 0-0%. Healthy functioning. %-20%. Some problems requiring careful monitoring. -2. People are somewhat able to bring themselves to work. 0. People are not able to bring themselves to work. Look to blue values in Desired Culture for guidance, if any. 2%-0%. Significant problems requiring immediate attention. %-40%. Serious situation requiring immediate leadership intervention and changes. Current & Desired Culture Alignment Values Matches: 2 4%+. Critical situation requiring leadership changes to avoid organisational failure. 6 or more. Excellent, strong, healthy culture. 4-5, good. Group is on the right track. 2-, fair. Group is somewhat on the right track. More work needs to be done. 0-, poor. Group is unhappy or frustrated, wants to see changes or take a new direction. Potentially Limiting Values: 0. This group does not operate from the basis of fear. -2. May be some element of fear behind how decisions are made or how people are managed. NEW VALUES TO FOCUS ON Any values shown in blue are values that are important to the individuals who work for the group and are requested in the Desired Culture but are not showing in the top values of the Current Culture. How can you support your staff to bring these values and strengths to work so that they and the group would derive further benefit from them? Any Desired Culture values shown in black are entirely new requests. They do not show in the Personal or Current Culture. To what extent are these values positive new requests, or maybe a reaction to something that is not happening or is unhealthy in the Current Culture? What themes do you notice with these new values? Open a dialogue with these people to gain a deeper understanding. +. Fear is a factor in how this group operates or is managed. confusion, bureaucracy, silo mentality Summary

Level Personal Values (PV) Current Culture Values (CC) Desired Culture Values (DC) 7 6 5 4 2 IRS (P)=6-- IRS (L)=0-0-0 IROS (P)=0--6-0 IROS (L)=0-0--0 IROS (P)=0--7-0 IROS (L)=0-0-0-0 fairness 50 5(R) brand image 56 (O) financial stability 42 (O) Matches making a difference 42 6(S) teamwork 42 4(R) long-term perspective 42 7(O) PV - CC 0 logic 40 (I) customer satisfaction 4 2(O) customer satisfaction 9 2(O) CC - DC 2 commitment 7 5(I) results orientation (O) fairness 6 5(R) PV - DC 4 new requests efficiency 5 (I) cooperation 4 5(R) confusion (L) 29 (O) bureaucracy (L) 27 (O) efficiency 4 (O) teamwork 4(R) Cultural Entropy: Current Culture 22% quality 4 (I) experience (I) achievement 29 (I) customer collaboration 26 6(O) goals orientation 24 4(O) profit 24 (O) employee fulfilment 0 6(O) quality 0 (O) professionalism 28 (O) trust 29 5(R) silo mentality (L) 24 (O) trust 28 5(R) Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = PV, CC & DC Orange = CC & DC Blue = PV & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting (white circle) I = Individual R = Relationship O = Organisational S = Societal Values Plot

Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values 7 7 5% 7 5% 7 8% C 6 6 9% 6 7% 6 9% 5 5 28% 5 5% 5 26% T 4 4 8% 4 20% 4 9% 2% 22% 20% 2% 0% 9% S 2 2 8% 0% 2 6% 4% 2 0% % 7% % 5% 6% % 7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 0% 20% 40% 60% 0% 20% 40% 60% CTS = 42-8-40 CTS = 27-20-5 CTS = 4-9-8 Cultural Entropy = % Cultural Entropy = 22% Cultural Entropy = % C = Common Good T = Transformation S = Self-Interest Positive Values Potentially Limiting Values Values Distribution

Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values Common Good 42% 27% 4% 20% Transformation 8% 9% % Self-Interest 7% 7% 22% Cultural Entropy % % CTS

Cultural Entropy Report This table depicts the survey participants total votes for Current Culture potentially limiting values by level. Potentially limiting values reflect the degree of disorder within a system and are found only at levels, 2 and. Please note that among the report diagrams slight variations in total Cultural Entropy percentages may occur as a result of rounding the level/category percentages to the nearest whole number. Level Potentially Limiting Values (Votes) Cultural Entropy % 2 confusion (29) bureaucracy (27) silo mentality (24) hierarchy (7) long hours (2) information hoarding (9) power (6) empire building () internal competition () manipulation (9) blame (6) cost reduction (20) control (5) short-term focus () caution (0) job insecurity (7) exploitation (5) 2% of total votes 4% of total votes 6% of total votes Total 229 out of 050 22% of total votes Cultural Entropy Table

Values Jumps A value jump occurs when there are more votes for a value in the Desired Culture than in the Current Culture. Listed below are the values with the largest increase in votes. The values in bold are represented in the Desired Culture. Current Culture Votes Desired Culture Votes Jump financial stability 6 42 26 employee fulfilment 5 0 25 long-term perspective 9 42 2 efficiency 4 2 fairness 7 6 9 trust 9 28 9 personal growth 5 24 9 positive attitude 27 6 leading by example 9 25 6 professional growth 6 22 6 Values Jumps Table

Positive Values Distribution This diagram shows the percentage of Personal, Current and Desired Culture votes for positive values by level. The table indicates the top Desired Culture values and Values Jumps chosen by participants at the levels where they are requesting the most new focus. These provide clarity around the desired direction of your group. 7% 7% 8% 5% 6% % 22% 20% 9% 20% 8% 9% 28% 5% 26% 9% 7% 9% 8% 5% 5% Level Level 2 Level Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Desired Culture Values financial stability customer satisfaction fairness trust employee fulfilment long-term perspective Values Jumps positive attitude leading by example Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values Positive Values Distribution

Current Culture Desired Culture Current Culture Values Finance profit financial stability Fitness Finance External Stakeholder Relations Fitness results orientation bureaucracy (L) efficiency quality professionalism Culture External Stakeholder Relations brand image customer satisfaction customer collaboration customer satisfaction Evolution Trust/ Engagement Direction/ Communication Evolution long-term perspective Supportive Environment Societal Contribution Desired Culture Values Finance Culture Trust/ Engagement Direction/ Communication Supportive Environment teamwork silo mentality (L) confusion (L) goals orientation teamwork employee fulfilment trust fairness Fitness External Stakeholder Relations Societal Contribution Evolution Culture Trust/ Engagement Direction/ Communication Supportive Environment Societal Contribution Business Needs Scorecard

BNS- Values Distribution This diagram shows the percentage of all values across the BNS areas. The table indicates the top Desired Culture values and Values Jumps in the areas where more focus is requested, and all the potentially limiting values. 5% 6% 5% 6% % 7% 2% 6% 5% 9% 4% 22% 4% % 2% % 2% 6% 2% 5% 5% 2% Finance Fitness External Stakeholder Relations Evolution Trust/ Engagement Direction/ Communication Culture Supportive Environment Societal Contribution Desired Culture Values financial stability efficiency quality professionalism long-term perspective teamwork employee fulfilment trust fairness Values Jumps personal growth professional growth positive attitude leading by example Potentially Limiting Values cost reduction bureaucracy long hours empire building internal competition short-term focus caution silo mentality control blame power confusion hierarchy information hoarding manipulation job insecurity exploitation Positive Values - Current Culture Cultural Entropy: Current Culture Business Needs Scorecard- Values Distribution Positive Values - Desired Culture