Coal mine goaf gas predictor (CMGGP)

Similar documents
COAL MINE GAS EMISSION ASSESSMENT FOR SEALED GOAF AREA OR ABANDONED MINE Lunarzewski L.W. Lunagas Pty Limited, Australia

REDUCING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF ABANDONED COAL MINES IN CHINA Sage, P. W., Future Energy Solutions Creedy, D. P., Wardell Armstrong

Application of fault tree analysis to coal spontaneous combustion

Managing the geotechnical aspects of longwall face recovery

Evaluation of structural component design in lifeof-mine

Ventilation and Gas Extraction Techniques of High Gas Seams in Kazakhstan

Strategies to Reduce GHG Emissions from Coal Mines: A Review of Australian Perspective

The Evolution in Coal Mine Gas Extraction A Response to Economic, Environmental and Community Pressures

Underground CMM Capture and Emission Reduction - a case study

Environmental Aspects of Mine Planning

3. MINING SYSTEM AND RESOURCE RECOVERY

Case Studies in the Application of Influence Functions to Visualising Surface Subsidence

A Simulation Model for Roadway Development to Support Longwall Mining

Case Study: Green Gas DPB, Czech Republic Integrated, large scale Mine Gas Management

Evaluation of Void Water intercepted by Werris Creek Coal Mine Operations

University of Wollongong. Research Online

An Innovative Drainage System for Coal Mine Methane Capture Optimisation and Abatement Maximisation

IMPROVING UIS GAS DRAINAGE IN UNDERGROUND COAL MINES

INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF HORIZONTAL IN-SEAM DRAINAGE. Global Methane Forum, March 28-30, 2016

30 th October 2007 Methane to Markets Beijing. Neil Butler Harworth Power Ltd. Coal Mine Methane Drainage and Utilisation

Case study: CMM utilisation and methane emissions mitigation at three large coal mines China Initial conditions:

CO2 Storage in Abandoned Coal Mines

Mine gas drainage and outburst control in Australian underground coal mines

Insights into the mechanics of multi-seam subsidence from Ashton underground mine

Poland Coal Sector Update Global Methane Initiative Coal Subcommittee Meeting

ACARP Project C Hydraulic Fracturing for Gas Recovery and Its Impact on Subsequent Coal Mining

Production prediction model of coalbed methane wells at stable production stage

SDPS for Windows: An Integrated Approach to Ground Deformation Prediction

ISMS Paper No. 89

underground coal mine delay data analysis system

An Overview of Offsets from Mine Methane Capture and their Role in California Cap-and-Trade. June 19, 2014

EFFICIENCY OF TECHNOLOGIES OF INTENSIVE METHANE RECOVERY FROM COAL SEAMS AND MINES PROPOSED FOR CLOSING

PA PETROLEUM INDUSTRY APPROACH TO COAL MINE GAS DRAINAGE

Bearing capacity of a glass fibre reinforced polymer liner

Numerical Modelling and Prediction of Abandoned Mine Methane Recovery: Field Application from the Saar Coalfield, Germany

Hydraulic Fracturing In Underground Coal Mines

CENTRAL MINING INSTITUTE. Methane Drainage and Utilisation in Polish Hard Coal Mines

6. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

Moolarben Coal Complex UG1 Optimisation Modification. Environmental Assessment APPENDIX F SURFACE WATER ASSESSMENT REVIEW

PERP/PERP ABSTRACTS Coal Bed Methane PERP 09/10S3

Belt Road Segregation and Escapeways - Compliance or Risk Management?

Theories and techniques of coal bed methane control in China

Gas Drainage Practices and Challenges in Coal Mines of China

STUDY ON INDICATOR GAS OF SPONTANEOUS COMBUSTION AND PREVENTION MEASURES

Underground Mine Ventilation Air Methane (VAM) Monitoring an Australian Journey towards Achieving Accuracy

Bulga Underground Operations Greenhouse Gas Management Plan

Introduction to Longwall Mining and Subsidence

HORIZONTAL DRILLING AT MINE III IN MINERALES MONCLOVA IN THE SABINAS BASIN COAHUILA, MÉXICO

Case Study: Long Term Abandoned Mine Methane Recovery Operation in the U.S.

Coal Mine Methane Drainage Considerations. Sabinas Basin, Coahuila Mexico. for the. Presented to: M2M Technical Workshop Monterrey, Mexico

Coal Mine Methane Project Development: Global Update

Mine Discharge Prediction in Steeply Dipping and Deep Mining Coal Seam in the Zhaogezhuang Mine

DEPARTMENT OF MINERALS AND ENEGRY MINE MANAGERS EXAMINATION COAL MINING II

LDO GROUP EMPLOYEE PROFILE. Senior Mining Engineer. Qualifications:

Strength properties of grout for strata reinforcement

Underground coal gasification Gordon Couch

Top coal caving. Tuesday 23rd October 2012: 11.45am. Chief Executive Officer. M GPO Box 358 Brisbane Qld 4001

Introduction. Drainage is also closely akin to the well production of natural gas, the principal constituent of which is CH 4

Coal Mine Methane Recovery & Utilization: A Global Overview of Project Opportunities

Spur Hill Underground Coking Coal Project. Groundwater Assessment for Gateway Application. Tuesday 16 June 2015

.Jan NEMCIK *, Ernest BAAFI and Ian PORTER

WAMBO COAL PTY LTD REPORT 2 NORTH WAMBO UNDERGROUND MINE EXTRACTION PLAN LONGWALLS 8 TO 10A GROUNDWATER IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW

Current Status and Future Prospects of Mining Subsidence and Ground Control Technology in China

ATTACHMENT 5 AQUIFER INTERFERENCE POLICY AND WATER LICENSING ADDENDUM

CBM TECHNIQUES IN THE SULCIS AREA (SW SARDINIA, ITALY) CARBOSULCIS S.p.A.

A Review of Spontaneous Combustion Incidents

Methane Capture and Utilization

One of the main requirements of any

Alternative excavation methods in undeground coal mining

Leading Practice and Mine Closure Australian Centre for Sustainable Mining Practices

CASE STUDY OUTBURST & GAS MANAGEMENT

Methane Control Technology for Improved Gas Use in Coal Mines in China. Report No. COAL R257 DTI/Pub URN 04/1019

Estimating and Reporting of

Determination of Gas Emission in the Mining Life Cycle

Pre-Mining Methane Drainage Drilling Applications

ATTACHMENT 2. Aquifer Interference Policy Considerations and Water Licensing COWAL GOLD OPERATIONS MINE LIFE MODIFICATION

New Directions in R&D in order to decrease methane hazard and to increase CMM capture - based on GIG experience

New techniques of coal seam panels' pre-drainage - based on project experience

AUSTRALIAN COAL ACTION PLAN

GLOUCESTER COAL QUARTERLY REPORT PERIOD ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2011 HIGHLIGHTS

MANAGEMENT OF EXPLOSION RISKS IN UNDERGROUND COAL MINES WITH THE USE OF BAG BARRIERS

MINE DEWATERING BY BOREHOLE SUBMERSIBLE PUMPING

The Challenge to Improve the Prediction of Subsidence Impacts

Improvements in long tendon support with pumpable resin

APPLICATION OF UNFC FOR MANAGEMENT OF CBM/CMM/AMM/VAM RESOURCES IN INDIA

Investigation into Roof Support Behaviour at Grasstree Mine

WAMBO COAL PTY LTD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. ATTACHMENT 2 Relevant Environmental Planning Instruments and Government Policies

Practise and Technology for Effective Methane Drainage and Utilization. Pre Drainage of Deep Coal Seams

In-seam drilling technologies for underground coal mines

Modelling of Mine Flooding in the Pittsburgh Coal Basin, USA

Unconventional Gas Market Appraisal

ASHTON LONGWALL 5 END OF PANEL SUMMARY REPORT

Poland Coal Sector Update Global Methane Initiative Coal Subcommittee Meeting

CMM Offset Generating Project Case Studies

Stimulation of Gas Flows Using Nitrogen Injection ACARP C Ting Ren University of Wollongong Wollongong. 28 th June 2017

Improving emergency management in underground coal mines

Draft Large-scale Consolidated Methodology ACM0008: Abatement of methane from coal mines

Eskom UCG Strategic Intent

USEPA and the Global Methane Initiative in Mongolia and the Region

Prediction of Water Production in CBM wells

Transcription:

University of Wollongong Research Online Coal Operators' Conference Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 2010 Coal mine goaf gas predictor (CMGGP) Les Lunarzewski Lunagas Pty Ltd Publication Details This conference paper was originally published as Lunarzewski, L, Coal mine goaf gas predictor (CMGGP)], in Aziz, N (ed), 10th Underground Coal Operators' Conference, University of Wollongong & the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2010, 247-256. Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: research-pubs@uow.edu.au

COAL MINE GOAF GAS PREDICTOR (CMGGP) Les Lunarzewski 1 ABSTRACT: Research has consolidated on the knowledge of gas emission characteristics of coal mine goaf in Australia into a form which enables emission predictions to be made using limited input data. The fundamental principles are encapsulated within the coal mine goaf gas predictor (CMGGP) professional engineering software. This easy to use tool is designed to predict the decline of methane emissions and calculate gas reservoir capacity of underground coal mine goaf. The method for estimating abandoned coal mine and goaf area methane potential is applicable to both dry and flooded mines and also takes into account coal mine methane utilisation options. The software will run on a PC with windows XP or vista operating system and can be used by individual specialists, coal mines and/or other institutions involved in coal mine closure, coal mine methane utilisation and greenhouse gas emissions reduction. INTRODUCTION When an underground coal mine ceases coal production methane gas continues to flow into the underground workings through the process of desorption from residual coal within strata disturbed by mining activity. For gassy mines this desorption process will continue for many years after closure and can resume when flooded mine workings are dewatered. The coal mine operator is therefore faced with potential long-term liabilities including explosion risks on the surface and possible dangers to the public as well as continuing greenhouse gas emissions. After stopping the ventilation system, pumping mine water and sealing mine outlets to the atmosphere (shafts, inclines, service boreholes etc.) gas release from goaf areas will continue until underground workings and macro-fractures are flooded. Responsible operators are now looking at ways to exploit methane from closed/sealed underground coal mines where practical to reduce environmental emissions, minimise public liability, to take advantage of an energy resource that would otherwise be wasted, provide some continuing local employment and to gain added value from the mine before total abandonment. A practical and scientifically-based prediction tool for assessing the methane production potential of underground coal mines goaf areas ranging in size from a single panel to whole-of-mine is presented. BACKGROUND In New South Wales and Queensland there are more than 50 underground gassy coal mines, which have ceased coal mining operations since after 1954 (Lunagas, 2004). Whereas various methods for predicting gas emissions in working mines are available and in regular use, no complete methodology has been established for predicting the decay of emissions once coal production ceases and the coal mine is no longer operating. However, extensive studies on gas emission from sealed goaves and abandoned coal mines have been undertaken by Lunagas Pty Limited using data predominantly from N.S.W & Q.L.D underground coal mines complemented by additional data from UK, Poland, Czech Republic, USA and Japan (Lunagas 2005). Thus, a method for forecasting long-term gas emission decay was developed for use by specialist industry practitioners in which predicted and measured data showed good correspondence. The future development of coal mine methane utilisation from coal mines goaf in Australia will depend on the availability of suitable sites and their proximity to a customer. Viability will also depend on the ability to predict both the quantity and decline rate of coal mine methane from those mines, to meet customer requirements whilst at the same time generating a profit for the operator. The national and local energy market for gas and electricity use is continually changing and schemes must be flexible to accommodate these changes while maintaining commercial viability and customer satisfaction. 1 Managing director, Lunagas Pty Limited - lunagas@ozemail.com.au 11 12 February 2010 247

It is therefore in the interests of coal mine operators to monitor and gather gas emission data from goaf areas to accurately quantify current emissions and to predict future emission for exploitation potential assessment. COAL MINE GOAF CLASSIFICATION All input data were gathered from five underground gassy coal mines (and their sealed longwalls and districts) located in New South Wales (4) and Queensland (1) and have been classified for coal mines goaf categories-stages related to the mining, hydro-geological and ownership conditions. Table 2 - Coal mine goaf classification Classification Temporary closed Closed Decommissioned Abandoned Mine entries &surface Ventilation boreholes Opened, not permanently or partially sealed Partially or fully sealed Permanently sealed Operating on reduced capacity Terminated Coal production Ceased Possible future production Ceased No future production Water pumping Optional Terminated Goaves gradually flooding Responsibility Mine operator (maintenance) Mine operator Transferred from mine operator to the relevant Government Authority Time Not a factor 1-20 years Once transfer occurs Sealed longwall or district Optional Mine operator Not a factor Note: For the purposes of this work, goaf is defined as the part or total mine from which the coal has been partially or wholly removed and is no longer ventilated to allow access. COAL MINE GOAF GAS RESOURCE MODELLING Gas is emitted from the worked seam ahead of mining, from unworked coal seams above and below a longwall as a result of the de-stressing caused by coal extraction and from any natural gas reservoirs disturbed by the mining activity (Lunarzewski 2001 & 2007). Once coal production stops, no further new gas release sources are activated but the existing gas sources continue to emit gas at a decreasing rate. Gas emission from coal seams in the disturbed zone around a longwall occurs as a result of desorption from the coal matrix and pressure flow through the natural and mining induced fractures. Where there are few coal seams above and below the worked seams, methane emissions at mine closure tend to be very low. However, Australian experience is that an exception might occur where there has been extensive room-and-pillar mining, with no pillar recovery, in moderately permeable coal when residual gas in coal pillars can contribute significant gas flows. Where de-pillaring is practised the situation is analogous to longwall extraction and gas flows from any adjacent seams will add to the emissions. For the proposed model a specific input data and information have been selected which include the most typical and achievable mining, gas and geological records. COAL MINE GAS DECLINE PHENOMENON The dry mine case refers to the condition where underground water is being controlled by pumping and gas released to the underground workings is either vented to the atmosphere or recovered for methane utilisation purposes. During coal production activities, gas emissions include both; 248 11 12 February 2010

Production gas released from the strata as a consequence of mining activities, and Background gas which remains and is released to the goaves during mining activities after stoppage or cessation of coal production When mining ceases production gas rapidly declines, however, the background gas declines slowly and stabilises after mine is closed and/or sealed. This occurs in a two phases of the decline process; 1. Rapid short-term decline phase, and 2. Slow long-term decline phase. Background gas represents the theoretical maximum emissions from mine goaf, however, gradual reduction of desorption from gas sources can be accelerated under suction. The rapid decline of production gas depends largely on the continuity and rate of mining (longwall retreat) over the period of a few weeks prior to cessation of the mine coal production. The final methane make before decay starts is taken (if recorded) as the average of the last month of coal production. For other cases the last five years average tonnage and methane make (relative gas emission) is used. Rapid short-term decline phase The initial rapid decline and stabilization phases take place during the first three to twelve months after mine finishes coal extraction. During that period of time the coal mine production gas is substantially reduced to the level of 30%-70% of the final gas make as a consequence of terminating strata relaxation process and continuation of strata reconsolidation phenomenon. Slow long-term decline phase The background gas long term gas decline phase starts from year one after time of longwall/mine closure and will last up to 15 to 20 (30) years decline limit time Figure 6 - Composite methane emission decay from a series of longwalls and the district (coal mine) GAS DECLINE CURVES Gas decline curves - Drysim and Wetsim have been generated using multi longwall excel spreadsheet models for selected underground coal mines with long term and full range data and information (Lunagas 2005). Both curves represent coal mine methane quantity and decline rate 11 12 February 2010 249

applicable to the nominated underground coal mines. A new concept has been developed and demonstrated in this paper for wider application in the general case where individual longwall and/or mine input parameters are not known in detail. The computer simulation program encapsulating the concept uses basic key-data and information available for the mine. This engineering software integrates the exponential function and a proprietary curves fitting routine to derive the exponential decay constants for various mines category. Drysim decline curves Mathematical formulae for the decline curves of each phase have been developed (Lunagas 2005) using long term empirical results from the selected longwalls and underground coal mines as a relationship between quantities of gas Y = litres CH 4 per second and time X = months. The formula includes two variable coefficients a - methane emission intensity and in situ gas sources productivity and b - the decline rate with time i.e. speed of decay. F(x) = a*e -bx Where: x - time (months) a - quantity constant b - decline constant Wetsim decline curves Two different methods can be used for predicting coal mine gas emission decline rates in a flooding coal mines goaf: 1. Simulation, 2. Flooding time constrained empirical decline curve. The Wetsim simulation method involves progressively reducing the decaying goaf emission sources contributing to a part or whole of a mine s gas emission to mirror the isolating effect of rising water (Figure 2). Data from all extraction panels in a closed mine are required for this method; but such information is not typically available in coal mines so was deemed not to be an appropriate method for use in the software model, however, if available could be calculated manually (Lunarzewski, Creedy, 2006). The constrained empirical decline curve The constrained decline curve methods make use of the characteristic exponential equation representing the slow long-term decline phase established for dry mine. Total coal mine gas resource is obtained by simulation using stratigraphy and in situ gas content. The basic expressions representing the background gas emission decline curve and the gas reservoir area graph shape which are respectively: (1) F(x) = a*e -bx and (2) F(x) = a*e -(a/gr)x This neat, simple concept illustrated in Figure 3 yields first order estimates when limited data are available. The gas emission start and end with time and flow rates are well defined in the flooding case. Gas emission will be zero when the mine is finally flooded and the time when this occurs is estimated from the void and water inflow data. The final 'Wetsim decline curve' becomes the combination of the above assumptions and the 'Drysim decline curve' mathematical formulae for the nominated conditions i.e. mine category (Lunagas 2005). 250 11 12 February 2010

The time taken for the workings to flood is calculated using a void volume model and inferred water inflow data. This method is practical, intuitive and seems to yield reasonable estimates and was therefore selected for use in the software model (Lunarzewski and Creedy, 2006). 2,000 1,800 Methane quantity (litres / second) 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 Drysim Wetsim 200 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (years) Figure 2 - Dry and wet coal mine goaf methane make decay simulation Gas flow at mine closure Gas flow Gas quantity decay Integral of fitted curve = Coal mine gas resource Mine totally flooded and gas flow = zero Time Figure 3 - Wetsim curve concept using zero methane emission EXAMPLES OF CASE STUDIES Prediction of coal mine methane emission decline quantity with time is determined by various decline curves which use the empirical coefficients defined for typical underground coal mines and consequently applicable to any coal mine goaf with a similar mining, gassy, geological, and hydrogeological conditions i.e. mine category (Table 2). 11 12 February 2010 251

Figures 4 and 6 show maps-selected districts of coal mine goaf categories and selected examples of gas emission trend graphs (Figures 5 and 7) for individual longwalls, district and the whole mine. Figure 4 - Category I - High gassy mine U/G workings Gas emission phases and coal mine categories Following cessation of mine coal production the coal mine gas emission (production and background gas make) has been classified into three consecutive phases: 1. Production gas rapid decline, 2. Background gas stabilisation period, and 3. Background gas long-term decline. The decline curve computes the quantity of coal mine gas (methane make) and its decline rate using the specific constants for selected category of the mine. Coefficients There are two major constants which classify and characterise the individual coal mine categories: quantity coefficient = 'a' and decline rate coefficient = 'b' 252 11 12 February 2010

Figure 5 - Category I mine - Longwalls and mine goaves methane emission versus time graph District 1 goaves Longwall goaf Figure 6 - Category VI and VII - District and longwall goaves U/G workings Table 2 - Coefficients for various goaf categories Category Description Quantity coefficient Decline rate coefficient I High gassy a I b I II Low gassy a II b II III Low permeability a III b III IV Temporary closed a IV b IV V Sealed district goaves a V b V VI Room & pillar goaf a VI b VI VII Sealed longwall goaf a VII b VII VIII High permeability or shallow mine a VIII b VIII 11 12 February 2010 253

District 1 District 1 goaves During Production Post Production Longwall sealed goaf Longwall goaf Figure 7 - Category VI and VII- District 1 & individual longwall goaves methane emission versus time graphs COAL MINE GOAF GAS PREDICTOR SOFTWARE The Lunagas Pty Limited Coal Mine Goaf Gas Predictor (CMGGP) is simulation software for predicting the decline rate of gas make and calculating the gas reservoir capacity of coal mine goaves (Lunagas, 2009). The software comprises three main sections. 1. The Coal mine parameters in which data are entered to facilitate calculation of the decline curves for both dry and wet mines. 2. Gas reservoir characteristics which allows entry of stratigraphical data for calculating the available gas reservoir. 3. Methane decline curves and gas reservoir charts (decline curves) showing the results of calculations made based on data in the above two sections. Flowchart The flowchart (including required input data) shows software application and availability for the nominated coal mine goaves. 254 11 12 February 2010

Software inputs and outputs Figure 8 - High gassy mine inputs for decline curves and gas reservoior 11 12 February 2010 255

Figure 9 - High gassy mine outputs REFERENCES Lunarzewski, L, 2001. Gas drainage practices, Coal Mining Operators' Geo-technology Colloquium, Wollongong, Feb., pp 34-44 Lunarzewski, L, 2004. Decommissioned Mines Methane Resource Assessment Study, Lunagas Pty Limited and Green Power Services Pty Ltd, Final report to the Department of Energy, Utilities and Sustainability (DEUS), Dec, pp 10-20 Lunarzewski, L, 2005, Gas emission curves for sealed goaves or abandoned mines, Lunagas Pty Limited, ACARP 2004 project No.C13007 Final Report, June., pp 4-25 and Appendix, pp 2-4 Lunarzewski. L and Creedy, D, 2006. Australian decommissioned mines gas prediction ACARP 2005 project C14080, Final Report, Sep., pp 40-55 Lunarzewski, L, 2007. Coal mine gas management for underground safety and environmental protection. L.Lunarzewski, Beijing Workshop, China, Nov., pp Slides 9-24 Lunarzewski, L, 2009. Gas emission expert model for abandoned coal mine, Lunagas Pty Limited, ACARP 2008 project No.C17058 Final Report, July, pp 16-28 256 11 12 February 2010