Performance of Wheat Varieties under Late and Very Late Sowing Conditions

Similar documents
HARI RAM*, GURJOT SINGH, G S MAVI and V S SOHU

Impact of climate change on wheat productivity in Ludhiana and Bathinda of Punjab

Influence of sowing date on the growth and yield performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties

SIMULATION MODELING OF GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND GRAIN YIELD OF WHEAT UNDER SEMI ARID CONDITIONS OF PAKISTAN

COMBINING ABILITY ESTIMATES OF SOME YIELD AND QUALITY RELATED TRAITS IN SPRING WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)

Zero Tillage Technique with High Yielding Variety for Wheat Cultivation as Compared to Traditional Method of Farmers: Evidences of FLD

Growth, Yield And Quality Of Bread Wheat As Effected Of Irrigation Interval And Sowing Date. Abstract

Yield Maximization of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars through Improved Water Management Strategy

Effect of Agronomic Practices on Green Fodder, Grain Quality, Grain Yield and Economics of Dual Purpose Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.

Available online at

Impact of Sowing Time on Yield Parameters of Selected Wheat Cultivars under Rice-Wheat Cropping System of District Sheikhupura, Punjab

Water requirement of wheat crop for optimum production using CROPWAT model

College of Agriculture, S.K. Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner , India

Performance of Summer Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) Hybrids under North Gujarat Conditions

Programme Assistant, Agronomy, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Chhindwara (Madhya Pradesh), India. 2

Effect of Potassium Nitrate on Yield and Yield Attributes of Spring Maize (Zea mays L.) under Different Dates of Planting

RESPONSE OF MAIZE TO PHOSPHORUS LEVELS AND PLANT DENSITY

Productivity and Profitability of Rain Fed Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Crop as Influenced by Variety, Fertility and Moisture Conservation

Influence of irrigation schedules and integrated nutrient management on Growth, yield and Quality of Rabi maize (Zea mays L.)

EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON GROWTH CHARACTERISTIC OF KHARIF MAIZE

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SOWING TECHNIQUES AND MULCHES ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD BEHAVIOR OF SPRING PLANTED MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)

Effect of Seed Bed and Different Sources of Nitrogen on Growth and Yield of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

PERFORMANCE OF CANOLA (BRASSICA NAPUS L.) UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION LEVELS

Effect of growing degree day on different growth processes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Effects of Sowing Rates and Methods on Weed Control and Yield of Wheat

Effect of Nitrogen Management Practices on the Productivity of Late Sown Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties

RESPONSE OF MAIZE TO PLANTING METHODS AND FERTILIZER N

Response of nitrogen levels and its time of application on yield and economics on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in eastern U.P.

Research Article Phonological Study of Maize Under Different Nitrogen Levels and Planting Densities

EFFECT OF PLANT POPULATION ON MAIZE HYBRIDS

Research Article Response of Wheat Crop to Humic Acid and Nitrogen Levels

DILIP SINGH*, D. R. SINGH, V. NEPALIA AND AMINA KUMARI

EFFECT OF FOLIAR VS SOIL APPLICATION OF NITROGEN ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF WHEAT VARIETIES

INFLUENCE OF LATE PLANTING DATES AND PLANTING METHODS ON SEED PRODUCTION OF CLOVERS

R. V. JOSHI, B. J. PATEL AND K. M. PATEL*

TO STUDY THE PERFORMANCE OF LENTIL (LENS CULINARIS M.) VARIETIES UNDER RAINFED CONDITIONS

ESTIMATION OF CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AMONG SOME YIELD PARAMETERS OF WHEAT UNDER RAINFED CONDITIONS

INFLUENCE OF METHODS OF SOWING AND N MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ON YIELD ATTRIBUTES AND YIELD OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)

EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF ZINC SULPHATE AND THIOUREA ON PRODUCTIVITY OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) IN DAUSA DISTRICT OF RAJASTHAN, INDIA

RESPONSE OF DIFFERENT WHEAT VARIETIES TO VARIOUS ROW SPACING

Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. Pak. j. life soc. sci. (2009), 7(1):25-30

GENOTYPIC AND PHENOTYPIC CORRELATION AMONG YIELD COMPONENTS IN BREAD WHEAT UNDER NORMAL AND LATE PLANTINGS

Study of Integrate Methods Chemical and Cultural Control of Weeds to Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

EFFECT OF PLANTING METHODS ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF COARSE RICE ABSTRACT

Screening of Maize Genotypes under Rainfed Condition of Madhya Pradesh, India

1256 Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) for hirsutum cotton under cotton- wheat cropping system in canal command area of North West Rajasthan, India

Agro-meteorological Indices to Predict Plant Stages and Yield of Wheat for Foot Hills of Western Himalayas

Agrometeorological Indices Requirement for Wheat Crop under Different Irrigation Levels

Effect of nitrogen levels and its time of application and yield on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in eastern U.P.

"Depanment of Agricultural Economics INTRODUCTION

INFLUENCE OF PLANTING TECHNIQUES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SPRING PLANTED SUGARCANE (SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM L.)

Response of Different Seed Rate on the Productivity of Hybrid Fodder Sorghum (Sugar graze) in South East Rajasthan

Integrated management of compost type and fertilizer-n in Maize

LODGING CAUSE HEIGHT AT THE CENTRE OF GRAVITY CHANGES DURING VEGETATION PERIOD FOR OAT

Effect of Wheat Residue Management and Fertilizer Levels on Growth and Yield of Fodder Maize (Zea mays L.)

Effect of Sowing Dates and Levels of Nitrogen on Growth and Yield of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON DEVELOPMENT AND GRAIN FORMATION IN SPRING WHEAT

THE PERFORMANCE OF NEW PEARL MILLET HYBRIDS WITH GREENGRAM UNDER SOLE CROPPING AND INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS IN SEMI-ARID ENVIRONMENT

EFFECT OF MOISTURE CONSERVATION PRACTICES, PHOSPHORUS LEVELS AND BACTERIAL INOCULATION ON GROWTH, YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.

YIELD RESPONSE OF FINE RICE TO NP FERTILIZER AND WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

EFFECT OF PLANTING METHODS AND NITROGEN LEVELS ON THE YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF MAIZE

YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF WHEAT AS AFFECTED BY DIFFERENT SEED RATES AND NITROGEN LEVELS

Combining Ability Analysis for Yield and Spot Blotch Disease Resistance in Tetraploid Wheat

YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF WHEAT AS INFLUENCED BY SYSTEM OF WHEAT INTENSIFICATION

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(8):

EFFECT OF PLANTING METHODS, SEED DENSITY AND NITROGEN PHOSPHORUS (NP) FERTILIZER LEVELS ON SWEET CORN (Zea mays L.)

TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY, NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND ECONOMICS OF RICE-WHEAT CROPPING SYSTEM AS INFLUENCED BY Crotalaria juncea GREEN MANURING

STUDIES ON INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN WHEAT

Agronomic performance of mash bean as an intercrop in sesame under different planting patterns

STABILITY ANALYSIS TO ASCERTAIN THE PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT GENOTYPES OF WHEAT [TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.]

K. S. SOMASHEKAR*, B. G. SHEKARA 1, K. N. KALYANA MURTHY AND L. HARISH 2 SUMMARY

Effect of Integrated Weed Management on Yield, Quality and Economics of Summer Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

Correlation and Path Analysis Studies in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes under Normal and Limited Moisture Conditions

Effect of Integrated Use of Fertilizer and Manures on Growth, Yield and Quality of Pearl Millet

Phenology and Heat Unit Requirement of Summer Green Gram Varieties under Different Sowing Windows

Impact of potassium levels and application timing on dry matter partitioning of Wheat crop in Peshawar valley

Integrated Nutrient Management for Yield and Economics of Maize (Zea mays L.) In-Rice-Gingelly-Maize Cropping System through Integrated Farming System

EFFECT OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ON THE GROWTH, YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF LENTIL

IJIRST International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology Volume 1 Issue 11 April 2015 ISSN (online):

Improving Use Efficiency of Inputs by Drip Irrigation in Bt Cotton

PROFIT MAXIMIZING LEVEL OF POTASSIUM FERTILIZER IN WHEAT PRODUCTION UNDER ARID ENVIRONMENT

Performance of Makhangrass (Lolium multiflorum) under Various Seed Rate in South East Rajasthan, India

GRAIN PRODUCTION AS INFLUENCED BY PLANTING PATTERN IN MAIZE

STUDIES ON PLANTING TECHNIQUE-CUM-IRRIGATION METHODS UNDER VARIED LEVELS OF NITROGEN ON GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF WINTER MAIZE (Zea mays L.

Determination of Heat Susceptibility Indices for Some Quantitative Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.)

Effect of Various Sowing Dates on Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Different Wheat Genotypes

Effect of Moisture Regime and Nutrient Management System on Yield and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Performance of Rainfed Wheat Based Intercropping in Kaymore Plateau

Studies on Path Coefficient Analysis in Maize (Zea mays L.) for Grain Yield and Its Attributes

Phenological traits of Maize influenced by integrated management of compost and fertilizer Nitrogen

Growth and yield attributes of canola varieties under different seed rates

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SOURCES OF NUTRITION AND IRRIGATION LEVELS ON YIELD, NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND NUTRIENT USE EFFICIENCY OF WHEAT

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT

Response of Barley varieties to Phosphorus and Sulphur levels

Performance of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) Intercropping as Influenced by Row Ratios and Nutri Cereal Crops

Effect of Land Configuration, Irrigation and INM on Quality, Nutrient Content and Uptake of Indian Bean (var. GNIB-21)

Wheat and Component Intercrop Yield, Land Equivalent Ratio and Monetary Indices Influenced by Intercropping and Row Proportions

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the principal cereal

Delayed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivation and role of diverse seeding rates and row spacings under semiarid agro-climatic situations

Effect of Foliar Nutrition on Growth, Yield Attributes and Seed Yield of Pulse Crops

Transcription:

International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 9 (2017) pp. 3488-3492 Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.428 Performance of Wheat Varieties under Late and Very Late Sowing Conditions Charanjeet Kaur* PAU Regional Research Station, Gurdaspur, Punjab, India *Corresponding author A B S T R A C T K e y w o r d s Wheat, varieties, Yield, Late sowing, Very late sowing. Article Info Accepted: 10 July 2017 Available Online: 10 September 2017 A field experiment was initiated to study the performance of seven wheat varieties under late and very late sowing conditions. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with fourteen treatment combinations in three replications. Treatments consisted of two sowing conditions i.e. late sown (11.12.2013) and very late sown (06.01.2014) in main plots and seven wheat varieties viz. PBW590, DBW90, WH1129, PBW550, HD3059, WH1021 and WH1124 in the sub plots. The results revealed that there was no statistical difference among sowing dates for yield and yield attributing characters, but significant differences were observed among different varieties in relation to yield and yield contributing parameters like effective tillers (m -2 ), number of grains per spike and 1000 grain weight (g). Among varieties, HD3059 was the top yielder (48.11qha -1 ) which proved significantly superior over PBW590, PBW550 and WH1021 and was statistically at par with WH1124, DBW 90 and WH1129. HD3059 can be considered as best variety for growing in late and very late sowing conditions. Introduction Wheat has a prominent position among cereals. It is high source of protein, good source of fibre and good in manganese and magnesium in unrefined state. Its area and productivity is increasing rapidly across the globe, due to its wider adaptability and sustainability under diverse agro climatic conditions (Kumar et al., 2014). There are various factors, which are responsible for low yield of wheat crop in the country but among these sowing time and and varietal selection are of primary importance. Wheat is the main crop of winter season and it has its own definite requirements for temperature and light for emergence, growth and flowering (Dabre et al., 1993). Selection of suitable crop varieties according to the agroclimatic conditions may play crucial role in realizing the optimum production of any crop commodity (Singh et al., 2008). Delay in sowing results in poor tillering and crop growth is generally slow due to low temperature. In late planting the wheat variety should be of short duration that may escape from high temperature at the grain filling stage (Phadnawis and Saini, 1992). Late sowing results in reduction of yield contributing characters like number of tillers and number of grains per spike (Ansary et al., 1989). The release of new varieties is a continuous process and different varieties perform differently under different sowing 3488

conditions. Therefore, the present study was conducted to judge the performance of various wheat varieties under late and very late sowing conditions. Materials and Methods A field experiment was conducted at Regional Research Station, Gurdaspur during the winter (rabi) season of 2013-14. The experimental soil was loam in texture, high in organic carbon, available phosphorus and potash and normal in ph and electrical conductivity. The 14 treatments were executed in split plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised of two sowing dates in the main plots and seven varieties in the sub plots. The dates of sowing were 11.12.2013 (Late sown condition) and 06.01.2014 (Very late sown condition). The seven varieties viz. PBW 590, DBW 90, WH1129, PBW550 HD 3059, WH1021 and WH1124 were grown in the sub plots. The sowing of the varieties were done by kera method in rows of 18 cm spacing and at a depth of 4-6 cm. The fertilizers were applied at the rate of 120 Kg N, 60 Kg P 2 O 5 and 40 Kg K 2 O per hectare.1/3 rd N, full phosphorus and potash were applied at sowing time and the remaining 2/3 rd N were applied as 1/3 rd N at first irrigation and 1/3 rd N at second irrigation. All other agronomic practices were kept normal and uniform for all the treatments. The data for germination count per square meter was recorded at 30 days after sowing. The data for other parameters like effective tillers per square meter, number of grains per spike, 1000 grain weight, biological yield and grain yield were recorded at maturity. For collecting data on effective tillers per square meter, three sites of one square meter each were randomly selected from each plot and mean was calculated. Grains per spike were calculated by randomly selecting ten spikes from each plot and then spikes threshed and 3489 total number of grain were calculated and then mean value was taken. A random sample of 1000 grains from each treatment was collected and weighed with digital balance for 1000 grain weight. The biological yield and seed yield were recorded on plot basis and were converted to quintal/hactare. Results and Discussion Germination count (m -2 ) The yield of any crop is determined by its stand count that is function of its initial germination. The germination count was significantly affected by date of sowing. The January sown crop recorded significantly lower germination count (173.3 m -2 ) as compared to December sown crop (234.7 m - 2). This may be due to temperature fluctuation. During the month of January temperature falls and it could not fulfil the requirement for seed germination. Razzaq et al., (1986) also observed the similar findings. The different varieties also showed significant differences in germination count (m -2 ). Maximum germination count was observed in variety WH1021 (218.4 m -2 ) which was at par with WH1124 and PBW550 and significantly more than rest of the varieties. Differences in germination count might be attributed to their genetic diversity. These results are in line with those of Aslam et al., 2003. The interaction between date of sowing and varieties were found to be non-significant. Effective tillers (m -2 ) Tillering mainly depends upon the green photosynthetic area which is responsible for carbohydrate formation, grain filling and final grain yield. The wheat crop sown late recorded more tiller production as compared to very late sown crop, however the differences were found to be non-significant, but different varieties showed significant differences in tiller production.

Treatments Germination count (m -2 ) Table.1 Effect of date of sowing on yield and yield attributes of wheat Varieties Effective tillers (m -2 ) Number of Grains per spike 3490 1000 grain weight(g) Biological yield (q/ha) Yield (q/ha) Date of sowing Late 234.79 333 35.22 36.95 99.5 43.31 Very late 173.10 325 37.18 35.89 88.1 42.96 CD at 5% 16.42 NS NS NS NS NS Varieties PBW 590 189.27 312 36.97 36.48 83.5 41.76 DBW 90 200.68 350 35.30 36.68 99.6 45.19 WH 1129 199.52 334 35.42 38.01 99.4 44.81 PBW 550 204.67 313 36.19 36.73 82.9 41.38 HD 3059 199.42 321 41.66 36.63 107.7 48.11 WH 1021 218.47 336 30.50 33.47 86.7 34.19 WH 1124 215.63 337 37.35 36.91 96.7 46.50 CD at 5% 13.20 26.07 4.15 1.63 8.0 3.78 Interaction NS NS 5.87 NS NS NS Table.2 Interactive effect of date of sowing on grains per spike of wheat varieties Sowing time Late Vey late Mean Grains per spike Variety PBW 590 41.01 32.93 36.97 DBW 90 34.91 35.68 35.30 WH 1129 34.79 36.05 35.42 PBW 550 33.87 38.51 36.19 HD 3059 37.29 46.04 41.66 WH 1021 27.44 33.56 30.50 WH 1124 37.25 37.46 37.35 Mean 35.22 37.18 36.20 CD at 5% Date of sowing NS Varieties 4.15 Interaction 5.87

Among the varieties, DBW90 produced maximum number of tillers which were at par with varieties WH1124, WH1021, WH1129 and HD3059 and significantly superior than PBW550 and PBW590. The differential variation for tiller production among genotypes might be due to their genetic variability (Aslam et al., 2003; Khaliq, 2004 and Shah et al., 2006) The interactive effects between date of sowing and varieties were non-significant. Number of grains spike -1 Number of grains per spike is an important yield attributing character. Data regarding number of grains per spike revealed that sowing dates did not affect significantly the number of grains per spike but significant differences were observed among varieties. The interaction between sowing dates and varieties was found to be significant. The variety HD3059 produced highest grains (41.66) per spike and it remained significantly superior over all other varieties. Variety WH1021 recorded the lowest number of grains per spike in late sowing conditions. Differences in number of grains spike -1 among varieties might be due to their genetic variability. Similar results were reported by Haider (2004). 1000 grain weight (g) The data regarding 1000 grain weight revealed that sowing conditions and different varieties and even interaction of both did not significantly affect the 1000 grain weight. However, the crop sown under very late sowing conditions recorded lower 1000 grain weight as compared to crop sown under late sown conditions. Many workers reported decrease in grain weight due to late sowing (Khan, 2000; Akhtar et al., 2006). This is because, delay in sowing shortens the duration of each development phase which ultimately reduces the grain filling period leading to lower grain weight (Spink et al., 2000). Among varieties, maximum 1000 grain weight was observed in WH1129 (38.01g) whereas least (33.47 g) was observed in variety WH1021. Biological yield (qha -1 ) Biological yield is reflected by growth parameters like leaf area, tiller production and plant height. It is evident from data that biological yield was not significantly affected by date of sowing, but different varieties showed significant effect on biological yield. The variety HD3059 recorded highest biological yield whereas least was observed in variety PBW550. The interaction between date of sowing and variety was found to be non-significant. Grain yield (qha -1 ) Grain yield of wheat crop is the combined effect of various yield attributing components. As shown in table 1 that different sowing conditions did not affect grain yield, but significant differences were found among different varieties in relation to grain yield. Among varieties, HD3059 recorded maximum yield (48.11 q/ha) and it was statistically at par with WH1124, DBW 90 and WH1129 and significantly superior over PBW590, PBW550 and WH1021.The variety WH1021 recorded significantly lower yield as compared to all other varieties and it was 28.9 percent lower yield than HD 3059. The highest yield of variety HD3059 might be due to maximum number of grain per spike. No interaction effects were observed between sowing dates and different genotypes (Table 2). It can be summarised that variety HD3059 can be considered as best among seven genotypes for growing under late and very 3491

late sowing conditions. Acknowledgement The author want to express sincere gratitude to Directorate of Wheat Research, Karnal for providing facilities under All India coordinated research project on Wheat and Barley for the conduct of this research. References Akhtar, M., M.S. Cheema, M. Jamil and Ali, L. 2006. Effect of time of sowing on some important characters of wheat, Triticum aestivum, genotypes. J. Agric. Res. 44(4): 255-259. Ansary, A.H., A.M. Khushak, M.A. Sethar, N.A. Ariam and Emon, M.Y.M. 1989. Effect of sowing dates on growth and yield of heat cultivars. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 32: 39-42. Aslam, M., M. Hussain, M. Akhtar, M.S. Cheema and Ali, L.2003. Response of wheat varieties to sowing dates. Pak. J. Agron. 2(4):190-194. Dabre, W.M., S.B. Lall and Lngole, G.L. 1993. Effects of sowing dates on yield, ear number, stomatal frequency and stomatal index in wheat. J. Maharashatra Agric. Univ.18: 64-66. Haider, R.S., 2004. Growth and yield response of three wheat varieties to N alone and in combination with P and P+K under late sown conditions. M.Sc. (Hons.) Agri. Thesis, University of Agricuture, Faisalabad-Pakistan. Khaliq, D., 2004. Modeling the growth, radiation use efficiency and yield of wheat under different sowing dates and varying nitrogen levels under rainfed conditions. M.Sc. (Hons.)Thesis, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad- Pakistan. Khan, N.A., 2000. Simulation of wheat growth and yield under variable sowing date and seeding rate. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Agronomy, University Agriculture, Faisalabad. Kumar, P., A. Sarangi, D. K. Singh and Parihar, S.S.2014. Wheat performance as influenced by saline irrigation regimes and cultivars. Journal of Agri Search1 (2): 66-72. Phadnawis, B.N., and Saini, A. D.1992.Yield models in wheat based on sowing time and phenological developments. Ann. Pl. Physio, 6: 52-59. Razzaq, A., P. Shah, B. Sartaj Khan, K. Saeed and Mohammad, D.1986. Effect of planting times on the growth and straw yield of wheat varieties. Sarhad J. Agric., 2(2): 327-334. Shah, W.A., J. Bakht, T. Ullah, A.W. Khan, M. Zubair and Khakwani. A. 2006. Effect of sowing dates on yield and yield components of different wheat varieties. J. Agron. 5(1):106-110. Singh, A.K., N. Manibhushan, Chandra and Bharati, R.C.2008. Suitable crop varieties for limited irrigated conditions in different agro climatic zones of India. Int. J. Trop Agr. 26 (3-4): 491-496. Spink, J.H., E.J.M. Kirby, D.L. Forest, R. Sylvester Bradley, R.K. Scott, M.J. Fouke s, R.W. Clare and Evans, E.J.2000. Agronomic implications of variation in wheat development due to variety, sowing, site and season. Plant, Variety and Seed 13: 91-105 How to cite this article: Charanjeet Kaur. 2017. Performance of Wheat Varieties under Late and Very Late Sowing Conditions. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 6(9): 3488-3492. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.428 3492