Logan River at Rendezvous Park, Channel and Floodplain Restoration: Crack Willow (Salix fragilis) Issues and Management Strategies

Similar documents
RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL CITY CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

Urban Riparian & Stream Restoration Program: Management & Photo Monitoring. Texas Water Resource Institute

TABLE OF CONTENTS. TOC-i

General Riparian Vegetation Concepts. General Riparian Vegetation Concepts WHY?

LITTLE SHADES CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT CWA Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant Project Workplan #17 ADEM Contract #C

LOGAN RIVER RESTORATION Draft Conservation Action Plan

Mill Creek Restoration in Lower Merion Township. PH (610) ; FAX (610) ;

South St. Vrain / Hall Meadows Restoration Planning August 20, 2015

Meacham Creek Restoration Project

Chapter 5: Water Quality Buffer Requirements

S.R. 4007, Section 14B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosure C Description of Aquatic Habitat

Step-Pool Creation to Restore Fish Passage and Riparian Health

Background. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Stream & Floodplain Management. Glossary

IMPROVING OUTCOMES FOR STREAM ALTERATION PROJECTS

Watershed Hydrology: Go with the flow. Greg Jennings, PhD, PE

VIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water

1.0 INTRODUCTION. Riparian Corridor Study and Management Plan Goals. The City has identified four primary objectives of the City Creek RCS as follows:

MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR SELECTIVE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT AND BANK RESTORATION (RANCHO SAN CARLOS AREA)

LEGAL AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTIONS

CHAPTER 1. Ecological Integrity

Water Resource Protection. Today s Presentation

Streamflow and Vegetation Response to the Removal of Tamarisk in Riparian Zones; An Example of the Canadian River JASPER BRUSUELAS

Stream Assessment Form (Form 1) Unified Stream Methodology for use in Virginia

THE WATERSHED The watershed is an area of land that drains into a stream. This includes both the surface runoff and groundwater. Because a stream is m

2017 Agricultural Water Quality Workshop

A GUIDE TO STREAM RESTORATION

SHORELINE INVENTORY AND RESTORATION PLANNING

Table D1: WC-R1 to WC-R3 (Wilket Creek Park)

BMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas

Maintaining Riparian Areas and Wetlands

Ithaca Creek Habitat Monitoring

There is a reliable, clean water supply for current and future generations.

Lesson 2-2: Riparian Zones

Public Information Centre September 19 th, 2017

STREAMBANK STABILIZATION: POST CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION MONITORING REPORT (YEAR 4 OF

MANAGEMENT OF WATERFRONT PROPERTIES FOR HOMEOWNERS

Old Mill School Stream Restoration

Galveston District Stream Condition Assessment June 2013

APPENDIX D: COST ESTIMATES FOR STUDY REACHES

Riparian Buffers for Water Resource Protection

STREAM RESTORATION PURPOSE, PRACTICE, AND METHODS. By Marcus Rubenstein, CPESC

TOWN OF SMYRNA Water Quality Buffer Zone Policy

Monitoring Report #3 Kenston Lake Stream Restoration Bainbridge, Ohio

Riparian Ecology Station OBJECTIVES

CITY OF SPRING HILL Water Quality Buffer Zone Policy (Adopted April 22, 2008)

Kelley Creek Confluence Restoration Monitoring

APPENDIX A. KEY RIPARIAN FUNCTIONS, SUPPORTING VEGETATIVE CONDITIONS, AND RIPARIAN BUFFER DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

MISSOULA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2018 COST-SHARE APPLICATION

SECTION 5.4 LOGJAM REMOVAL AND RIVER RESTORATION

Stream Restoration Proposal 2014, Plum Run Tributary West Branch

Riparian Buffer Plantings. Image: Virginia Outdoor Foundation

' MY () Interim Risk Reduction Measures Grubbing in Cleared Areas Chena River Lakes Project Fairbanks, Alaska

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (CRAM) Buffer and Landscape Context Attribute

1/16/2016. California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (CRAM) Buffer and Landscape Context Attribute. Buffer and Landscape Context Attribute

SR 161: Jovita Boulevard to South 360th St. Stage 2 / WSDOT Stream Buffer Mitigation (Agreement Y-9403) 2012 Final Monitoring Report

Get the Rock Out: Engineered wood structures for stream restoration. Joe Berg, Doug Streaker, Matt Koozer and Kevin Nunnery Biohabitats, Inc.


S.R. 2027, Section 02B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosure C Description of Aquatic Habitat

Welcome to the Open House

5A Consider Approval of 60% Design Plans for 2017 Plymouth Creek Stream Restoration Project, Plymouth (CIP 2017CR-P)

WELCOME! Mill Creek Daylighting Technical Feasibility Study. Thank you! Open House December Please sign in and get a comment form.

Riparian Areas. 101 An overview. Prepared by: Jacque Sorensen, M.Sc. TRU Department of Natural Resource Sciences

RIVERSIDE OXBOW FORT WORTH, TEXAS CHAPTER 3 IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES

Middle Wind River Riparian Enhancement Project. Presented by

STATE OF MISSOURI CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION 2012 GENERAL AND SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

Urban and Suburban Stream Restoration Structures

Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas

Managing Iowa Habitats:

Conifer restoration on the Duncan-Lardeau Flats Wildlife Properties. January 2006

EXHIBIT 9. Supplemental Environmental Projects Plan

Understanding and Restoring Natural Floodplain Function. Gary James CTUIR Fisheries Program Manager

Stream Watch Visual Survey Instructions

3.6 Riparian Ecosystem Wildlife

Public Notice. Public Notice No. Date: April 8, 2016 CENAP-PL-E Comment Period Closes: May 9, 2016

3 Baseline and Existing Conditions

RIPARIAN PROTECTION. Figure 4.4. Results of the riparian health assessment (Cows and Fish 2001).

Riparian Forest Ecology & Management. Derek Churchill, Nov 8, 2014

D Olive Watershed. Path Toward Restoration

Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution

Carp Creek 2013 Summary Report

Dallas Floodway Improvements

7.0 WATER-BASED CONTROL MEASURES

Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 Resource Identification Enclosure C Description of Aquatic Habitat

Upper Mississippi River. Systemic Forest Stewardship Plan. Executive Summary

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

CIP-01: Stream Channel Stabilization, Silver Creek

orking Trees for Water Quality

Stream Corridor Protection and Adaptive Management Manual. Prepared for the City of Independence, Missouri

No. 6 December, Wisconsin s Forestry Best Management Practices for Water Quality Forest Roads

Massachusetts River and Stream Crossing Standards: Technical Guidelines

719 Griswold, Suite 820 Detroit, MI DANVERS POND DAM REMOVAL AND STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT

Oatka Creek Stream Stabilization and Habitat Restoration Project Narrative

Yakima Tributary Access & Habitat Program Summary of Accomplishments Diversion 14 Fish Passage and Screening, 2003 Ahtanum Creek

Restoring Riparian Zone Function

Use of WARSSS in Stream Restoration and Watershed Planning. Michigan Aquatic Restoration Conference 2015

Restoration of Riparian Forests and Riparian Ecosystem Processes and Implications for Salmon Restoration. Katie Ross-Smith Jennifer Hammond

CITY OF NEW WESTMINSTER. Bylaw No. 7033, 2005 RIPARIAN AREAS PROTECTION BYLAW

Logan River Restoration Draft Conservation Action Plan Summary Spreadsheet February 2016

Mixed Conifer Working Group Meeting April 15, 2011 Water and Soil Resource Management Considerations

Transcription:

Logan River at Rendezvous Park, Channel and Floodplain Restoration: Crack Willow (Salix fragilis) Issues and Management Strategies Prepared May 2, 2017 by Darren Olsen, BIO-WEST, Inc. Issues Crack willow is a deciduous multi-stem tree that grows 50 to 80 feet tall and 1 to 3 feet in diameter. Its name comes from the audible crack that occurs when branches break and fall. Easily propagated from broken twigs, this species was brought to North America from Eurasia during Colonial times, and now is invading riverine habitats in Logan, Utah. It escaped cultivation (intended plantings) and spreads easily from twigs and root suckers. Crack willow is considered invasive in 9 States, including Utah. Originally grown as individual trees in parks for fast growing shade and firewood, crack willow has spread along Cache Valley waterways into monoculture thickets. Crack willow expansion is effectively replacing many native riparian species, dominating the form and function of river channels, and impacting floodplain functions in all Cache Valley rivers. Crack willow thickets appear naturalized because the trees look old and half dead, however most trees are only 30 to 50 years old. Top ten reasons why crack willow thickets are a problem along the Logan River: Grows rapidly and consumes large quantities of water Creates dense closed canopy monoculture thickets Eliminates protective grasses, sedges, rushes, and forbs from growing on streambanks Replaces smaller more functional native shrubs, including species such as coyote willow, yellow willow, peachleaf willow, dogwood, woods rose, and water birch Outcompetes and replaces more functional native trees, including narrow leaf and Fremont cottonwoods Negatively impacts fish and wildlife habitats Prevents natural meander migration and bar development processes Causes accelerated bank erosion, downstream sedimentation, and water quality problems Grows in channel and reduces flood conveyance capacity, and Diminishes floodplain functions

Crack willows are often mistaken as native cottonwood trees, but are not native to this area and functionally are very different. Cottonwood trees more often coexist with other native shrubs, grasses and forbs, whereas crack willows create monoculture thickets. Multiple layers of riparian vegetation associated with cottonwood trees provide habitats for a wide range of native wildlife species; including birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Native riparian vegetation also provides better bank stabilization and filtering functions, which reduces sediment and nutrient loads to downstream reaches of the Logan River and Cutler Reservoir. Crack willow thicket along the Logan River at Rendezvous Park. Notice a lack of native grasses, shrubs and trees along the streambanks, and many areas of active bank erosion. In contrast, this bank along the lower Logan River retains diverse riparian vegetation layers. Near water overhanging shrubs improve instream habitat, protect streambanks, and trap sediments while not causing excessive woody debris accumulation in the channel. Multiple canopy layers provide higher quality wildlife habitat.

Furthermore, mature cottonwood trees are generally positioned above the bankfull channel on older floodplain surfaces, whereas crack willows occupy a lower position on the streambank, sometimes in the active channel. Streambanks under crack willow trees are usually void of a protective ground cover and exhibit high erosion rates. Undesirable concrete revetment is common near crack willows. The dense root structures and large trunks often cause flow blockages, and increase the potential for full channel avulsions to occur. An example of a full channel avulsion happened during the recent 25-year flood event in 2011 when the river suddenly changed its course across the golf course toward Park Avenue. Play at the golf course was impacted for several months from standing water and sediment deposits. Crack willow trees are often positioned low in the active channel along the Logan River. The massive trunks cause accelerated bank erosion, and serious flood and safety hazards.

Management Strategies to Improve Riparian Vegetation Conditions Logan River Restoration in this reach involves practices to restore channel and floodplain processes to support aquatic, wetland, and riparian habitats within the constraints of the project site (railroad, highway, pedestrian bridges, and golf course). The project will also improve water quality in Logan River and Spring Creek. Additional trails and recreational opportunities are also associated with the project.

The Logan River Restoration at Rendezvous Park project consists of the following construction activities: Excavating a new meander cut-off channel between the golf cart bridge and the railroad bridge that provides instream pool and riffle habitat, hydrologic connection to the floodplain (cut-off channel restoration area), and an accessible location to remove sediment accumulations Installing an earthen berm in the existing Logan River channel to block flow from entering the re-routed channel Creating additional pool habitat at the confluence of Logan River and Blacksmith Fork River (lower channel restoration area) downstream of the existing pedestrian bridge and dog park, and an accessible location to remove sediment accumulations Installing instream buried rock field to provide grade control and prevent headcutting and incision at critical points Restoring 1000 feet of Spring Creek within the abandoned Logan River channel reach (Spring Creek restoration area) between the present confluence with Logan River and the railroad bridge Restoring wetlands along the restored Spring Creek channel (wetland restoration area) Enhancing wetland and riparian vegetation conditions in a 50-foot wide corridor along both sides of the new channel alignment Removing crack willow deadfall and litter, trash, and bank-hardening material including riprap, old cars, and rebar, within the project area Removing nonnative and invasive plant species and replacing and vegetating with native riparian, wetland, and upland seed mixes, and shrubs and trees Using best management practices to prevent discharges of construction-generated sediment To implement the restoration project, all existing standing and downed crack willow trees will be removed within the new channel alignment and within a 50-foot buffer adjacent to the streambanks as shown on the proposed concept map and cross section. This is necessary to re-establish native shrubs along the restored stream channel. The revegetation plan for the project area will include: Pre-project herbicide treatment of undesirable vegetation Tree and debris removal (preserving trees along existing trails) Project channel and floodplain construction, soil placement, and preparations for revegetation Post-project seeding, mulching, and plantings (including community planting workshop) Post-project monitoring of indicator condition assessments at the reach scale, and revegetation success at the project area scale, providing on-going management recommendations, and Long-term weed control measures to prevent future invasions of crack willow, phragmites, Siberian elm, English elm, Russian olive, thistle, and other invasive weeds The revegetation plan also includes a long-term cottonwood tree replacement strategy for remaining crack willows, starting with priority trees causing flood conveyance problems and raising safety concerns for trail users. Many of the remaining crack willows within this project area will be removed in future years after replacement cottonwood trees have become established and grown to a height of at least 15 feet. Also, crack willow replacement strategies should occur in the upstream residential and urban reaches to reduce the source of twigs that may cause future floodway invasions.