SEPA Environmental Checklist Mercer Island Center for the Arts. Attachment I Tree Assessment

Similar documents
FORESTRY AND VEGETATION MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS

May 17, Ms. Taine Wilton Capital Projects Office Edmonds School District # th Ave W. Lynnwood, WA 98036

Unhealthy Tree Removal

T REE I N V E N T O R Y A N D R E T E N T I O N P L A N R E P O R T Proposed Subdivision at 4320 Island Crest Way, Mercer Island, WA

PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR MAJOR TREE REMOVAL

Diamond Head Consulting Ltd. Arborist Report

Diamond Head Consulting Ltd. Tree Management Recommendations for 1266 UEL Block 6

The District of North Vancouver

SouthShore Forest Consultants. Arborist Report. For

Heron Glen Wetland Buffer Enhancement Project. Progress Report. November 15, 2005

Background Information : Elevation: Between 100 and 200 feet above mean sea level:

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:

Cursory Tree Evaluation Report:

CLIMATE CHANGE AND FOREST BIODIVERSITY: A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND ACTION PLAN FOR NATIONAL FORESTS IN WASHINGTON

Imminent Threat Tree Removal

Table 1. Summary of tree conditions and recommendations. At a Minimum. DBH (in) Condition Target Risk. - Work Recommended Bigleaf

SSAFR Field Tour to the Olympic Peninsula

Non-Development Tree Permit Application. SITE ADDRESS: Property Owner (required): Property Owner Address: Property Owner Phone:

Puget Sound Energy Energize Eastside Project

Productivity of red alder in western Oregon and Washington

Wetland and Stream Sensitive Areas Study for Buffer Reduction Parcels and -0178, Lake Forest Park, WA

M E M O R A N D U M Clallam County Public Works Department

Example Forest Health Sections (Resource Category 1)

Wetland and Stream Sensitive Areas Study Boundary Line Adjustment/Reasonable Use Parcels and -0178, Lake Forest Park, WA

Mercer Island Open Space Projects PROGRESS REPORT 2005

January 10, Mr. Kevin J. Johnson, President JBA, Inc. 205 North Frederick Ave., Ste. 100 Gaithersburg, MD 20877

Salem Street Trees: Sample Inventory

Diamond Head Consulting Ltd. Arborist Report

Kielty Arborist Services LLC Certified Arborist WE#0476A P.O. Box 6187 San Mateo, CA

A selective herbicide for broadleaf weed and grass control in forestry, maize, sweetcorn, peas, certain orchard crops and long-term weed control in

I-405 Congestion Relief and Bus Rapid Transit Projects: Renton Nickel Improvement Project (Renton Stage 1) Mitigation Site USACE NWP

Muhlenberg College Tree Plan

This Tree Variance Request is accompanying the submission of Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan NRI was approved 08/23/2016.

Staff Review Date: August 9, 2017 HDC PID#

Saving Native Trees. In the Pacific Northwest. A Guide to Native Tree Retention for Developers, Homeowners, Contractors and Professionals

ISA Certified Arborist PN-6545A PO Box ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Lake Forest Park, WA WA. Business #

Abiotic Tree Stress and Damage Identification and Management. Glenn Ahrens OSU Extension Forester, Clackamas, Marion & Hood River Co.

Puget Sound Energy Energize Eastside Project

Tree Retention Plan LAKE STEVENS, WASHINGTON GROUP FOUR JOB #

Tree Inventory and Assessment Report Laurelpark Subdivision Part Lot 19, Concession 6, Town of Caledon (Albion) Town of Caledon, Region of Peel

Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan Report 1490 York Road St. Davids, ON

APPENDIX B. Arborist Report

Field Identification Guide

ARBORIST REPORT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT BLOOR STREET & PRESTONVALE ROAD CLARINGTON, ONTARIO PREPARED FOR:

River s Crossing Significant Tree Overview Assessment 18 June 2012

Forests in the Field. Forests have complex physiognomy: stand structure. Stand structure develops through time

Richard Johnson & Associates, Vista Canyon Project Off Site Oak Tree Report, City of Santa Clarita (February 2010)

Updated Tree Preservation Ordinance Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ s) September 2015

2007 Selected Urban Forest Inventory Summary

dpd 331B Seattle Permits Tip Hazard Trees STEPS FOR TREE ASSESSMENT Department of Planning and Development

SILVICULTURE SILVICULTURE 10/8/2018. Ecological forestry (Ecosystem management)

May 18, Nick Pappani Raney Management 1501 Sports Drive Sacramento, CA 95834

Air-Excavation Procedure

Permit Requirements for Landslide-Prone Areas in the City of Seattle. Slope Stability and Vegetative Soil Stabilization in the Puget Sound Region

March 27, Paul Pittman, MS, LEG Principal, Element Solutions

April 28, Montreal Road, City of Ottawa Tree Conservation Report

STEM CHARACTERISTICS AND WOOD PROPERTIES: ESSENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS IN SUSTAINABLE MULTIPURPOSE FORESTRY REGIMES

UPDATED TREE REPORT 470 and 498 Corona Road Petaluma, CA

Puget Sound Energy Energize Eastside Project

CITY OF LOS ANGELES TREE REPORT 1220 SOUTH HOPE STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90015

9 Plant Wind and Flood Resistant Trees

Forest Storm Damage Factsheet. Washington State Department of Natural Resources August 2012

Table of Contents. Page 1 of 15

FOREST INVESTMENT ACCOUNT FOREST SCIENCE PROGRAM

Arborist Report for 233 Janefield Avenue, City of Guelph

TREE PROTECTION (no.) CODE 990

Arborist Report/ Tree Inventory & Protection Plan

APPENDIX D. Tree Inventory

Project Information Manotick Station Road, Greely, ON K4P 1P6

Ecology of Pacific Madrone. Glenn Ahrens Oregon State University Extension Forestry and Natural Resources Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative

SAJUAN) Ç(ISLA D, À/KITSA o ties J4A \131 U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE.FOREST SERVICE

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM BYLAW NO. 3474

Arborist Report for 87 & 91 Brookfield & 174 Lakeshore Road West Oakville, ON (July 23, 2013)

2.4 MANAGING FOR HIGH-VALUE TREES

The City of Ken more MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM:

SAN MARINO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT Submittal Checklist for PRIVATE TREE REMOVAL REQUEST

ECOLOGICAL FOREST MANAGEMENT

LANDSCAPING (TREE REMOVAL)

Western Oregon Forest Ecology. Michael Ahr, Forest Conservationist

Application to Remove Two Private Trees - 18 Longhouse Place

MANAGING STAND QUALITY (INCLUDING PRUNING)

Pecky Rot in Incense-Cedar: Evaluation of Five Scaling Methods

Tree Preservation and Protection (Effective May 1, 2003)

AHCARB403 Defect Evaluation Form

Minnetonka Code of Ordinances

Appendix J-1 Marking Guidelines Alternative 4 GTR 220

Planting Trees Along Local Streets

LANDSCAPING (TREE REMOVAL)

Regeneration / Young Stand Models

Fountaingrove II Open Space Maintenance Association c/o Focus Real Estate 3936 Mayette Avenue Santa Rosa, CA Attn: Board Members

TREE REMOVAL, PROTECTION & CARE

FOREST ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Appendix A (Project Specifications) Patton Mill Fuel Break Project

2016 Yosemite West Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project

Oak Tree Permit Number PL Review 4895 Las Virgenes Road, Calabasas, California

WESTERN WASHINGTON HARDWOOD ASSESSMENT

Tree Assessment Report Prepared for: Dr. Peter Giarrizzo 18 Franklin Place Pelham NY 10803

April 11, Background. property, Tree Risk. were. tree parts. The basic. premise of. educated. eliminate all trees. ASSESSMENT

TREE PRESERVATION SUMMARY

TREE ORDINANCE TOWN HALL MEETING. December 8, 2014

Transcription:

SEPA Environmental Checklist Mercer Island Center for the Arts Attachment I Tree Assessment January 2017

Bruce Lorig Director Mercer Island Center for the Arts P.O. Box 1702 Mercer Island WA 98040 RE: Tree Assessment within proposed MICA Project Limits at Mercerdale Park Dear Bruce, We are pleased to present the Tree Assessment findings covering the proposed location of the Mercer Island Center for the Arts (MICA). ISA-Certified Arborist and Tree Risk Assessor Kyle Braun preformed a Level 1 assessment of all trees located within the proposed MICA project limits (Figure 1) on the northwest corner of Mercerdale Park on Mercer Island, Washington. The Watershed Company assessed the potential tree impacts in light of the proposed development and construction that will take place based on plans provided to The Watershed Company on October 13, 2016 from Magnusson Klemencic Associates. Methods A site visit was made on October 17, 2016 to assess the subject area and a basic Level 1 visual assessment was performed according to International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) standards. This assessment evaluated current tree forms, overall vigor of subject trees, proximity of trees to the proposed development and extent of impacts within the critical root zones of the trees. Photographs of the general study area and tree health are included at the end of this letter. Local Regulations Trees in Mercer Island are regulated under the Mercer Island City Code (MICC) Unified Land Development Code Chapter 19.10, Trees. In addition, activities within the standard buffer of the on-site wetland are regulated by MICC 19.07. The Mercerdale Park parcel is zoned Public Institution (P).

Page 2 Overall Tree Evaluation Mercerdale Park is on the north end of Mercer Island, south of the downtown area. The MICA lease area is located north of the Mercerdale Skate Park (Figure 1) in Township 24N, Range 04E, Section 12. Developed areas are present north and northeast of the project area. A forested hillside with trails is located to the west, and a maintained park lawn area is present to the east. A wetland is located to the south and west of the proposed MICA facility and there are also numerous informal trails running through various portions of the project area. Figure 1 -- MICA lease area provided by AMS Planning and Research. The lease area contains a paved parking lot and an abandoned recycling building accessed from SE 32nd Street. On the day of the site visit, approximately 130 trees were assessed, many of which are located within the standard (50-foot) wetland buffer. The tree species observed consisted of a majority of deciduous, weedy species as defined in MICC 19.10.000, such as red alder (Alnus rubra), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), and bitter cherry (Prunus emarginata). There are approximately nine western red cedars (Thuja plicata) with an average diameter at breast height (DBH) of 6 inches, all of which are dead or in severe condition. There are also approximately 18 Douglas-firs (Pseudotsuga menziesii) with an average DBH of 7 inches, most of which are dead or in severe condition (Figure 2-8). This is uncharacteristic for trees of this age which suggests there are other abiotic or biotic issues that are causing these trees to die. It is suspected that the lack of rainfall in the Puget Sound region over the last couple of years has

Page 3 resulted in a significant amount of drought stress on many of the trees in the region. This has caused many of the Douglas-firs (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and western red cedar (Thuja plicata) in the region to become unusually susceptible to disease and pests. There are also many newly planted young trees throughout the project area (Figure 5), but many of the young trees are also dead or in severe condition. The suspected cause of the poor health of the young trees is also lack of sufficient water in the summer and fall, making them more susceptible to other biotic issues. Located on the west side of the large, central lawn is a hedgerow consisting of 15 Leyland Cypress (Cupressus x leylandii). These trees are approximately 10-15 years old and have been consistently hedged since their installation (Figure 2). These trees have very little habitat function and are also in poor health. They were also planted very close together to serve as screening for the recycling center; this has resulted in die-off of many of the inside branches. If these trees were to be removed it would result in no loss of function to the overall forest health. The proposed MICA site plan calls for the removal of 54 conifers and 58 deciduous trees. The deciduous population being removed consists mostly of weedy trees such as alders (Alnus rubra) and cottonwoods (Populus trichocarpa), including many from within the standard wetland buffer. The coniferous population being removed consists of western red cedars (Thuja plicata) and Douglas-firs (Pseudotsuga menziesii), nearly all of which are dead or in severe condition. The proposed mitigation plan, prepared by The Watershed Company, specifies 74 trees to be planted within the wetland buffer. This includes 60 conifers and 14 deciduous trees, which would meet replacement requirements defined in MICC 19.10.060. This includes full replacement of all conifers to be removed and partial replacement of the weedy deciduous species to be removed. The plan also specifies soil amendments designed to improve the health of both the proposed new trees and remaining trees on the site. Conclusions Overall health of the trees within the project area is very poor. The cause of death and poor health conditions of these trees is suspected to be drought stress and lack of watering which is consistent with these species around the region. The majority of the conifers in the project area are dead or in severe condition, therefore removal and reuse of the logs for habitat structures within the reduced wetland buffer would be a more desirable method then attempting to retain any of these trees. After review of the proposed project extents, grading limits, proposed drainage, and current site functions, it is concluded that the trees proposed for removal are either dead or in poor health and provide little function to the park, the wetland and wetland buffer.

Page 4 Implementation of the mitigation plan will eventually result in a higher functioning forest compared to the current condition. Limitations The findings of this report are based on the best available science and are limited to the scope, budget and site conditions at the time of the assessment. Although the information in this letter is based on sound methodology, internal structural flaws (such as cracking or root rot) or other conditions that are not visible cannot be detected with this limited basic visual screening. Trees are inherently unpredictable. Even vigorous and healthy trees can fail due to high winds, heavy snow, ice storms, or rain. This report is based on the current observable conditions and may not represent future conditions of the trees. Any change in site condition, including clearing and grading, will alter the condition of remaining trees in a way that is not predictable. Remaining trees should be monitored for signs of stress, pathogens and structural defects after clearing and MICA construction by the project arborist. The conclusions contained within this report have been made for permitting purposes only. Tree assessment related to park visitor safety and safeguarding structures or other targets must be done separately and after The Mercer Island Center for the Arts has been completed. Please call if you have any questions or if we can provide you with any additional information. Sincerely, Kyle Braun ISA Certified Arborist / Tree Risk Assessor

Page 5 Figure 2 Dead Douglas-firs (Pseudotsuga menziesii) located near the former recycling center and Leyland Cypress (Cupressus x leylandii) hedge located behind the Douglas-firs. Figure 3 Dead conifers located near hedge row and former recycling center.

Page 6 Figure 4 Dead Douglas-firs (Pseudotsuga menziesii) located in project area. Figure 5 Dead young western red cedars (Thuja plicata).

Page 7 Figure 6 & 7 Dead western red cedar (Thuja plicata) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Figure 8 Dead conifers located near former recycling center.