INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR

Similar documents
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR (c)(1)(i)-(xii)

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

Report. Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan Belle River Power Plant East China, Michigan. DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI

Coal Combustion Residuals Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION 40 CFR (c)(1)(i)-(xii) PLANT WANSLEY ASH POND (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY. Carrollton, Georgia 30116

CHOLLA POWER PLANT BOTTOM ASH POND INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN CH_Inflowflood_003_

Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan Plant McDonough-Atkinson Ash Pond 3 (AP-3) and Ash Pond 4 (AP-4)

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN. Bremo Power Station CCR Surface Impoundment: North Ash Pond INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD

Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION 40 CFR (c)(1)(i) (xii) PLANT HAMMOND ASH POND (AP 2) GEEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Report. Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan St. Clair Power Plant St. Clair, Michigan. DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

APPENDIX III Hydrologic and Hydraulic Evaluations

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan for Louisa Generating Station CCR Impoundment. MidAmerican Energy Company

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

North Omaha Ash Landfill Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

Figure 1: Overview of all AutoCAD generated cross-sections.

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION 40 CFR (c)(1)(i)-(xii) PLANT MCDONOUGH ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

ASH FILTER PONDS INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM INITIAL PLAN

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION 40 CFR (c)(1)(i)-(xii) PLANT MCDONOUGH ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Green Station CCR Surface Impoundment

CHOLLA POWER PLANT FLY ASH POND INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN CH_InflowFlood_002_

INITIAL HAZARD POTENTIAL CLASSIFICATION ASSESSMENT REPORT

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

Stantec Consulting Services Inc Lebanon Road, Cincinnati, OH 45241

PEARCE CREEK CONFINED DISPOSAL AREA MODIFICATION

CCR Certification: Initial Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan for the

HYDROLOGY CHECKLIST FOR LAND DISTURBANCE PERMITS

Introduction to Storm Sewer Design

Site Description. CCR Rule Initial Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan (cont.) 2

Technical Memorandum

NC2 Ash Disposal Area Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan

Application for a Dam Permit Ash Basin No. 1

To: From: Date: Subject: Sherwood Lakes Drainage Alternatives Analysis 1

CE 585 Construction Site Erosion Control The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL. New Chevrolet and Cadillac Dealership Jasper, AL

Dawson County Public Works 25 Justice Way, Suite 2232, Dawsonville, GA (706) x 42228

McElroy s Run Impoundment Structural Stability Assessment Report

Detention Pond Design Considering Varying Design Storms. Receiving Water Effects of Water Pollutant Discharges

MIDAS CREEK PROJECT. FINAL DESIGN REPORT SKR Hydrotech 4/11/2012

Module 6 Temporary Pond and Silt Fence. Noboru Togawa. Presented to: Dr. Pitt Construction Site Erosion Control

Initial Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

Modernization of High Hazard Dams in Austin, Texas. TFMA Spring Conference May 23, 2007

D. B. Wilson Station CCR Landfill

TVA Colbert Fossil Facility Ash Disposal Pond 4

Initial Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond)

Harrison Landfill Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan

Coal Combustion Residuals Unit Structural Stability Assessment

SC-01 Surface Outlet and Baffle Sediment Basin

2016 ANNUAL INSPECTION REPORT W.H. Sammis Coal Plant South Pond Stratton, Ohio

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT YATES ASH POND A (AP-A) 40 CFR (c)(1)(i)-(xii) Newnan, GA 30263

MD Exhibit MD1 SMALL POND DESIGN CHECKLIST. ProjectName. Engineering Firm Date Submitted. Vicinity Map Pond Summary Sheet (MD-ENG-14) Pond Class

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

CCR Rule Report: Initial Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan For Ash Basin B At Brayton Point Power Station

FORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL PLAN

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B) 40 CFR (c)(1)(i)-(xii) Newnan, GA 30263

D.E. KARN GENERATING FACILITY BOTTOM ASH POND HAZARD POTENTIAL CLASSIFICATION ASSESSMENT REPORT. Assessment Report. Pursuant to 40 CFR 257.

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER (SWEPCO)

CCR Rule Operating Criteria Closure Plan

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Lyon Creek Cedar Way Stormwater Detention Dam Operation and Maintenance Manual

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

4.2 Cherry Creek & Stillhouse Branch

Project Drainage Report

APPENDIX K OPERATIONS AND FINAL COVER SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESIGN

Water Resources Management Plan

Jacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc.

Watershed size and name: The drainage area is acres. The pond is located within the Ohio River watershed. (2016 Inflow Design Plan)

Via October Mr. William Neal, P.E. Technological Specialist DTE Electric Company One Energy Plaza Detroit, MI 48226

Final Drainage Report

Submittal Requirements. Post Construction Verification Document Plan Requirements

Surface Skimmer and Baffle Sediment Basins, Modeling the Benefits

Pond Closure - Case Study[TP1]

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER (SWEPCO)

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis

Memo. To: From: cc: For further assistance please contact Ben Ruzowicz, GSWCC Technical Specialist at (706)

ALLIANT ENERGY WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COLUMBIA ENERGY CENTER CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT ANNUAL INSPECTION REPORT. January 15, 2016

HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1.0 Background Watershed Description Hydrology - HEC-HMS Models Hydraulics - HEC-RAS Models...

CCR Annual Inspection (b) for the Ash Pond at the A.B. Brown Generating Station. Revision 0

Transcription:

INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR 257.82 EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R. Part 257 and Part 261), 257.82, requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or any lateral expansion of a CCR impoundment to design, construct, operate and maintain an inflow design flood control system capable of adequately managing flow during and following the peak discharge of the specified inflow design flood. The owner or operator must prepare an inflow design flood system written plan documenting how the inflow design flood control system has been designed and constructed to meet the 257.82. The CCR surface impoundment known as the Plant McManus Ash Pond (AP-1), is located on Plant McManus property, just west of Brunswick, Georgia. Plant McManus is owned and operated by Georgia Power Company. The facility consists of a 93.4 acre CCR storage area. The inflow design flood consists of the rainfall that falls within the limits of the surface impoundment and runoff from 68.1 acres of adjoining watershed. Stormwater is temporarily stored within the limits of AP-1 and discharged through a primary spillway. The primary spillway is a 4-foot-tall x 8-foot-wide rectangular concrete channel with a 120 V -notch spillway. The primary spillway channel discharges into Burnette Creek, a brackish water tributary to the Turtle River. The pond incorporates an auxiliary spillway that is not engaged until rainfall exceeds the 1,000 year design storm. The Plant McManus AP-1 is in the process of being closed through removal of the CCR from the CCR unit. As of March 2018, approximately 60% of the CCR has been removed. AP-1 is dewatered as required to facilitate excavation of ash for removal. All CCR is being excavated, transported, and disposed of in an offsite Solid Waste permitted landfill. Closure is anticipated to be completed 4 th Quarter 2018. The pond dike and primary spillway are intact and continue to impound water. During ash pond closure, accumulated water is managed by a temporary water treatment system in accordance with a dewatering plan approved by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division. The treated water is then discharged via the NPDES permitted outfall located at the westernmost corner of AP-1. When discharged, the treated water is sampled and monitored in accordance with the approved dewatering plan.

1.0 Purpose of Calculation The purpose of this report is to demonstrate the hydraulic capacity of the subject CCR impoundment in order to prepare an inflow design flood control plan as required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency s (EPA) final rule for Disposal of CCR from Electric Utilities (EPA 40 CFR 257.82). 2.0 Summary of Conclusions A hydrologic and hydraulic model was developed for Plant McManus Ash Pond 1 to determine the hydraulic capacity of the impoundment. The design storm for Plant McManus Ash Pond 1 is a 1000-year rainfall event. Southern Company has selected a storm length of 24-hours for all inflow design flood control plans. The results of routing a 1000-year, 24-hour rainfall event through the impoundment are presented in Table 1 below: Plant McManus Normal Pool El Table 1-Flood Routing Results for Plant McManus Ash Pond 1 Top of embankment El Primary Spillway Crest El Peak Water Surface El Freeboard * Peak Inflow (cfs) Peak Outflow (cfs) 6.00 9.00 Ash Pond 3.00 4.56 5.88 0.12 1,717.31 4.88 (El. Varies) *Freeboard is measured from the top of embankment to the peak water surface elevation 3.0 Methodology 3.1 HYDROLOGIC ANALYSES Plant McManus Ash Pond 1 is classified as an exempt structure by the Georgia Safe Dams program and a significant hazard under the EPA s CCR Rule (EPA 40 CFR 257). The design storm chosen for the ash pond is a 1000-year rainfall event given the potential environmental impacts. A summary of the design storm parameters and rainfall distribution methodology for these calculations is summarized below in Table 2. Table 2. Plant McManus Ash Pond Storm Distribution Hazard Classification Return Frequency (years) Storm Duration (hours) Rainfall Total (Inches) Significant 1000 24 17.60 Rainfall Source NOAA Atlas 14 Storm Distribution SCS Type III

The drainage area for Plant McManus Ash Pond 1 was delineated based on topographic survey data and USGS topo acquired for the Plant in January 2018. Runoff characteristics were developed based on the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) methodologies as outlined in TR-55. An overall SCS curve number for the drainage area was developed based on the National Engineering Handbook Part 630, Chapter 9 which provides a breakdown of curve numbers for each soil type and land use combination. Soil types were obtained from the Natural Resources Conservation Service s online soils database. Land use areas were delineated based on aerial photography. Time of Concentration calculations were developed using the Technical Paper 55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds (TR-55) method for computation of travel time and time of concentration. A table of the pertinent basin characteristics of Ash Pond 1 is provided below in Table 3. Table 3 Ash Pond 1 Hydrologic Information Drainage Basin Area (acres) 161.47 Hydrologic Curve Number, CN 82.5 Hydrologic Methodology SCS Method Time of Concentration (minutes) 23.4 Lag Time (minutes) Not applicable Hydrologic Software Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis 2016 Runoff values were determined by importing the characteristics developed above into a hydrologic model with the Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis 2016 program. Process flows from Plant McManus were not considered in this analysis as Ash Pond 1 does not receive any type of process inflows from the Plant. 3.2 HYDRAULIC ANALYSES Storage values for Ash Pond 1 were determined by developing a stage-storage relationship utilizing contour data. The spillway system at Ash Pond 1 consists of a rectangular concrete channel with a V -notch weir installed at the midpoint. This primary discharge spillway and weir discharges outside of Ash Pond 1 s containments and into Burnette Creek, a tributary of the Turtle River. The hydraulic analyses assume conditions of the pond receiving a 1000 year, 24-hour storm event at normal pool (El. 3.00). The analyses also assume that the primary spillway is the only flow path for pond discharge (an emergency spillway exists but is supplementary to this evaluation).

The primary spillway is composed of a 4 ft tall x 8 ft wide rectangular concrete channel with a V -notch weir. The V-notch weir invert elevation is 4.56 ft. while the top of the channel wall is 6.33 ft. The receiving channel from the V-notch weir has the same dimensions as the upstream rectangular concrete channel. A summary of spillway information is presented below in Table 4. Table 4 Spillway Attribute Table Spillway Component Concrete Channel US Invert El (feet) DS Invert El (feet) 2.12 2.10 Weir 4.56 4.56 Dimension 4 ft x 8 ft (rectangle) 120 V, 6.25 ft (top width) and 1.77 ft (depth) Slope (%) Length Spillway Capacity (cfs) 0.00 28 N/A 0.00 0.07 18.34 Based on the spillway attributes listed above, a rating curve was developed and employed by Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis 2016 to determine the pond performance during the design storm. Results are shown in Table 1. 4.0 SUPPORTING INFORMATION 4.1 CURVE NUMBER A conservative curve number of 82.5 was calculated for Plant McManus Ash Pond 1 as the pond drainage basin consists of the pond s gravel perimeter road and the pond containment itself. 4.2 STAGE-STORAGE TABLE Stage Elevation Contour Area Incremental Storage Total Storage (ft-msl) (sq. feet) (cu. ft) (cu. ft) 0-6 30,755 0 0 1-5 79,085 53,059 53,059 2-4 272,429 166,082 219,142 3-3 556,653 406,127 625,268 4-2 865,497 705,348 1,330,616 5-1 1,319,457 1,084,422 2,415,038 6 0 1,650,124 1,481,565 3,896,603 7 1 1,884,670 1,765,922 5,662,525 8 2 2,133,683 2,007,689 7,670,213 9 3 2,705,971 2,413,926 10,084,139 10 4 2,937,690 2,820,889 12,905,028 11 5 3,259,251 3,096,906 16,001,934 12 6 3,307,096 3,282,816 19,284,750

4.3 TIME OF CONCENTRATION A time of concentration (Tc) of 23.4 minutes was calculated for the Ash Pond. The Tc was calculated using the overland flow path that begins and travels through the adjacent residential neighborhood and eventually drains into the ash pond basin.

4.4 RATING CURVE

4.5 DRAINAGE BASIN