Quantifying Ecosystem Service and Values of the Urban Forest. David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Syracuse, NY, USA

Similar documents
Transcription:

Quantifying Ecosystem Service and Values of the Urban Forest David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Syracuse, NY, USA

Overview Ecosystem services Measuring services Top down Bottom up Telling the story New tools International limitations

Urban Tree Effects / Benefits Air quality improvement Water quality improvement UV radiation reduction Cooler air temperature Building energy conservation Greenhouse gas reduction Aesthetics Noise reduction Wildlife habitat Social / physiological benefits Human health

Measurement is Critical Structure Function Value

Develop Management Plans Current State Future State (better)

Help meet Environmental Regulations U.S. EPA Clean Air Act Incl. carbon Clean Water Act Australia - National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) National Environment Protection Measures Potential funding

www.itreetools.org

What is i-tree? A suite of tools to assess urban vegetation and their ecosystem services and values i-tree Eco = UFORE v. 3.0 programs

Public-Private Partnership USDA Forest Service Davey Tree Expert Co. National Arbor Day Foundation Society of Municipal Arborists International Society of Arboriculture Casey Trees

i-tree Use Distributed to over 90 countries

Assessing Urban Forests Top-down approach Aerial-based Bottom-up approach Ground-based

Top-down Approach Cover Data Landsat (30 m) Hi-resolution (~1 m) Photo-interpretation

Cover Maps

Photo Interpretation 14

PI Mapping 15

i-tree Canopy (v. 4.0)

You choose the cover classes

Classify random points

Melbourne results Tree Cover = 13.0% SE = 1.5% N = 500

Change Analysis 2007 2002

Tree Cover 60.0% Year 1 Year 2 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0%

Ground-based Approach: i-tree www.itreetools.org

Core Programs

The Foundation: Local Data Local Sample or Inventory Local information: Weather Pollution Environmental variables Hourly simulations

Assessing Urban Tree Populations i-tree Eco assesses: Structure Function Energy Air pollution Carbon VOC emissions Value Management needs Pest risk Tree health Exotic/invasive spp.

How is an assessment done? i-tree Step 1 Determine Study Area

i-tree Step 2 Determine if inventory or sample

i-tree Step 2a Determine Number of Plots Typically 200 1/10 acre plots

i-tree Step 3 Determine what data to collect Required core variables (spp, dbh) Optional variables Crown parameters Tree health Distance to buildings Shrub data Ground cover data

i-tree Step 4 Lay sample points Random Pattern Random Grid Pattern Stratified by LU

Random with no Stratification

Random with Stratification

i-tree Step 5 Set up project

i-tree Step 6 Train crews and collect field data

i-tree Step 7 Enter data and analyze

i-tree analyses

i-tree Step 8 Use data and reports to make a difference Automatic Report Generator

i-tree: Demonstrating That Trees Pay Us Back! Street Tree Benefits in Minneapolis: $6.8 million in energy savings $9.1 million in reduced storm water runoff $7.1 million increase in property value $1 million improvements to air quality

Making Change in Casper, WY Hired first Urban Forester Started Pilot UF Forestry Program Established benchmarks for program evaluation Implement program to diversify plantings Administrative support

Chattanooga, Tennessee

Informed Management Decisions EAB Structural Impacts: 17.4% Canopy Loss Milwaukee Ecosystem Assessment (2008) $221 Million structural damage (citywide) EAB Functional Impacts: $243,785 less pollutant removal $138,000 less energy savings (cooling costs) $2.6 million reduction in storm water benefits (1996 study)

Oakville Management Advances Integration of UF with air quality and climate protection initiatives By-laws to protect large stature trees on public & private property Justified expense for tree inventory & UF management plan Canopy goals & guidelines for developments Compelling message

Strategic Marketing & Promotion

Demonstrating Tree Value

Demonstrating Tree Value

Demonstrating Trees are Assets

Public Relations Campaign http://www.mortonarb.org/our-impact/tree-census.html

Current Model Version 3.0

Species Selection based on Ecosystem Services

v. 4.0 Improvement

Street Tree Storm Damage Estimates

Map and Project Cover and Ecosystem Services (NLCD data)

i-tree Version 4.0 (March 10, 2011) 5 New or Enhanced Tools Canopy Pest

i-tree-hydro Separate GIS program Calibrates against stream flow data

Links NCLD to Google Maps Allows for Corrections

Pest Pest Detection Protocol Collect Pest & Disease Signs Symptoms Reports Associated pest & diseases Trends/patterns

Regional Scale Local Scale i-tree 2 nd Generation (Version 5.0+) On-line Mapping tools Growth / Mortality / Influx rates Land / Tree Cover Landscape Change

Priority Planting Index

Temperature Mapping On-line Mapping tools Heat Island Baltimore, Maryland Growth / Mortality / Influx rates Land / Tree Cover - - Landscape Change Source: Heisler et al., USFS

On-line Mapping tools Heat Island Baltimore, Maryland Growth / Mortality / Influx rates Land / Tree Cover - - Landscape Change Source: Heisler et al., USFS

On-line Mapping tools Heat Island Baltimore, Maryland Growth / Mortality / Influx rates Land / Tree Cover - - Landscape Change Source: Heisler et al., USFS

Regional Scale Local Scale Pollution Distribution Conc. Vd Temp. Flux

International Analyses Model designed work for U.S. e.g., species information, pollution data Data from other counties can have issues Looking for international partners to help build international versions

Updating data bases Field Data Species Data New species botanical info, shading coeff., range, dec/evergreen, growth rate (S,M,F), height, life span (S,M,L) Location Data New city lat/long, elevation, time zone, leaf on/off dates, albedo and terrain factors Weather Data Pollution Data Hourly concentration in proper format

Updating program information Carbon Biomass formulas, growth rates Air Pollution VOC emissions Energy Will not work outside U.S. Valuation CTLA formula spp factors, base values Local carbon and pollution values ($/t)

Conclusion Urban forests and their benefits can be assessed i-tree can help Australian version of i-tree is being developed

Questions? dnowak@fs.fed.us nrs.fs.fed.us/units/urban