EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Similar documents
Best Petroleum Explorations, Inc. M. Brad and Sandra Dixon Themselves PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Valence Operating Company

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

EXAMINERS' REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

October 25, 2006 PROCEDURAL HISTORY

EXAMINER S REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Rebel Production Company and Greg Cloud Gene Powell Investments REVISED EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Chaparral Natural Resources, Inc.

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

Railroad Commission of Texas PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

December 30, 2002 PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Protestants: Holmes Exploration, LLC and Red Willow

THE APPLICATION OF FORGE ENERGY, LLC, INC. TO AMEND FIELD RULES FOR THE SHAFTER LAKE, N. (SAN ANDRES) FIELD, ANDREWS COUNTY, TEXAS

May 6, 2009 PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

Tennessee Underground Injection Control Program Overview

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION. Horizontal

IN THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI ORDER. the State Oil and Gas Board on the Amended Petition of

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OIL, GAS, AND MINERALS DIVISION OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS. Filed with the Secretary of State on

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

Railroad Commission of Texas. Chairman Elizabeth Ames Jones Commissioner David Porter Barry T. Smitherman

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Class I Injection Wells in Texas

THE APPLICATION OF STORM PEAK ENERGY, LLC TO AMEND FIELD RULES FOR THE FORD, WEST (4100) FIELD, CULBERSON AND REEVES COUNTIES, TEXAS

CONSOLIDATED PROPOSAL FOR DECISION

UIC Program & Natural Gas Storage

December 22, 2008 OIL & GAS DOCKET NO

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

Railroad Commission of Texas. Victor G. Carrillo - Chairman Elizabeth A. Jones Commissioner Michael L. Williams Commissioner

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Rule 326: Mechanical Integrity Guidance

August 24, 2000 OIL & GAS DOCKET NO

STATE OF ARKANSAS ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY. REGULATION NO. 17 Effective May 4, 1989 Arkansas Underground Injection Control Code

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

THE APPLICATION OF ANADARKO E & P COMPANY, LP TO AMEND THE FIELD RULES FOR THE DAVIDSON RANCH (PENN 7890) FIELD, CROCKETT COUNTY, TEXAS

L.C.S. Production Company. AAH Fidelity, LLC and Sam Henshaw PROCEDURAL HISTORY

CONCENTRATE AND BRINE MANAGEMENT THROUGH DEEP WELL INJECTION. Abstract

An Introduction to Salt Caverns & Their Use for Disposal of Oil Field Wastes

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

* FINAL ORDER: RULE 37 EXCEPTION DENIED * *****************************************************

Parker (Wolfcamp) Parker (Pennsylvanian) Chevron requests that the following rules be adopted for the proposed field:

Summary of Issues Strategies Benefits & Costs Key Uncertainties Additional Resources

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 652. UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

EXAMINER S REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

EXAMINERS' REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 7B

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RECENT CHANGES TO LOUISIANA S UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAM. By: Marjorie A. McKeithen and Brett S. Venn

$~J??~ William Teplow Field Manager PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE CONSTRUCTION. April 28, 1991

Regulatory Framework for Natural Gas Storage in Pennsylvania and Tariff Development for Natural Gas Storage. May 14, 2008

Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) Act KCC Rule Development

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

July 26, 2000 APPLICATION OF HENRY PETROLEUM CORPORATION TO CONSIDER PERMANENT FIELD RULES FOR THE HOMANN (SAN ANDRES) FIELD, GAINES COUNTY, TEXAS

PHMSA Requirements for Underground Storage of Natural Gas

Proposed New 18 CFR Part Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale and Other Formations:

Newfield Exploration Company

California Well Stimulation Treatment Regulations

Exaro requests that the following rules be amended for the Lyda (Vicksburg Lower) Field:

May 25, 2006 EXAMINER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

ORDINANCE NO.: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY GENERAL ORDINANCE CODE TO PROHIBIT HIGH-INTENSITY OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

NAVAJO NATION UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL REGULATIONS

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER QUALITY DIVISION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC) CLASS V WELL

H. Philip Whitworth O Ryan Oil and Gas Robert Green Jason D. Bailey

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

Representing EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

AMENDED PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY. Date of Notice of Hearing: March 18, 1993 Dates Case Heard: April 15, 1993 June 30, 1993

December 3, 2007 OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

Injection Wells. An injection well is a vertical pipe in the ground into which water, other liquids, or gases are

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

Review of Existing Injection Well Permit Regulations and Expectations of Future Geologic Sequestration CO 2 Regulations with Monitoring Conditions

Criteria for mapping brackish groundwater

Underground Storage of Natural Gas Liquids in Ohio s Underground Salt Deposits

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON GAS WELL PERMITS GW10-2_GW10-3

CHAPTER 32 - WELL ABANDONMENT ORDINANCE OF DUBUQUE COUNTY, IOWA. Adopted September 5, Part 1 Introduction...2

Appearances Representing Philip Whitworth Stroud Petroleum, Inc. Scott D. Stroud EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER

BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI. Docket No Order No ORDER

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

UNDERGROUND INJECTION AND SEQUESTRATION AND UNDERGROUND SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER (PROTECTING A VALUABLE RESOURCE)

CHAPTER GROUND WATER CLASSES, STANDARDS, AND EXEMPTIONS

DEEP INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION

REGULATION NO. 1 ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY COMMISSION PREVENTION OF POLLUTION BY OIL FIELD WASTE

CHAPTER 39 REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPERLY PLUGGING ABANDONED WELLS

Transcription:

OIL & GAS DOCKET NO. 03-0267035 THE APPLICATION OF ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPERATING, LLC PURSUANT TO STATEWIDE RULE 95 TO SUPPLEMENT THE EXISITING PERMIT TO CREATE, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN AN UNDERGROUND HYDROCARBON STORAGE FACILITY TO INCLUDE HYDROCARBON LIQUIDS STORAGE, PG & E STORAGE LEASE, BOLING FIELD, WHARTON COUNTY, TEXAS HEARD BY: Donna Chandler on October 14, 2010 APPEARANCES: Tim George Joe Ratigan Mark Thompson REPRESENTING: Enterprise Products Operating, LLC EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Enterprise Products Operating, LLC ( Enterprise or Applicant ) already holds a permit for underground storage of hydrocarbon gas at the subject facility in the Boling Salt Dome pursuant to Rule 97. In this docket, Enterprise requests to expand its permit authority to include, in addition to gas storage, underground storage of hydrocarbon liquids at the subject facility pursuant to Statewide Rule 95. The application was unprotested, and the Examiner recommends approval. DISCUSSION OF THE EVIDENCE The Enterprise facility is located at the Boling Salt Dome in the Boling Field in Wharton County, Texas. The facility site is approximately 2 miles north of the city of Boling, Texas. Geological maps and cross sections depict Boling Salt Dome as a large salt dome with a broad flat top and steeply dipping flanks. The caprock overlying the salt varies in thickness; depth to the top of caprock is generally about 630 feet, with the shallowest caprock encountered at a depth of 383 feet. The top of the salt occurs generally at an approximate depth of 1,000 feet. Salt cores tests establish that Boling Salt Dome salt has a high degree of unconfined compressive strength, comparable to and consistent with other Gulf Coast domal salts utilized for storage of hydrocarbons.

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 03-0267035 PAGE 2 The wells and storage caverns will be situated within the central portion of the salt dome, away from the perimeter boundaries of the salt. The locations of the wells and caverns within the facility afford ample distance to other permitted caverns and adjacent properties. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality recommends that usable quality water be protected to a depth of 200 feet at this site. A search of public records identified wells within a ¼ mile Area of Review surrounding the facility and well, including both wellbores that have been plugged and abandoned and wellbores currently in active storage or production service, and available plugging reports were submitted. The three wells currently proposed for liquids storage service under Rule 95 (Well Nos. 6, 7 and 8) will be cased and completed to confine stored hydrocarbons within the storage wells and caverns, to prevent waste of the stored hydrocarbons, to prevent uncontrolled escape of hydrocarbons, and to protect usable-quality water from pollution. Each well is planned for a total depth of approximately 5,100 feet with several casing strings: 42" conductor pipe driven to approximately 280 feet; 36" surface casing set at approximately 500 feet and cemented to surface; 30" intermediate casing cemented to surface; 26" intermediate casing cemented to surface; and 20 production casing cemented to surface. The storage caverns will be created by solution mining. During this process, fresh water will be injected under controlled conditions to dissolve the salt and create the cavern space, and brine will be removed for disposal. A diesel blanket will be used to prevent washing of the cavern above desired depths. The blanket/brine interface depth will be monitored and interface logs will be run to verify the blanket depth. The boundaries of the cavern will be determined by periodical sonar caliper surveys during the development. When fully leached, each cavern will have a capacity of 10 million barrels. If created for liquids storage service under Rule 95, the top of each cavern will be at a depth of approximately 2,200 feet and the bottom of the cavern will be at a depth of approximately 3,900 feet. If created for gas storage service under Rule 97, the top of each cavern will be at a depth of approximately 3,700 feet and the bottom of the cavern will be at a depth of approximately 5,100 feet. Each cavern will be approximately 300 feet in diameter. Notice of application and hearing were provided to each person and entity entitled to notice. Enterprise has complied with the requirements set forth in Statewide Rule 95 for approval of the requested permit. When operating in liquids storage service under the requested Rule 95 permit, the facility, well, and cavern will be subject to the applicable rules and safety standards adopted by the Commission pursuant to Statewide Rule 95.

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 03-0267035 PAGE 3 FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Notice of application and hearing were provided to each person and entity entitled to notice. 2. The subject facility is located approximately 2 miles north of the city of Boling, Texas. 3. Enterprise currently holds a Commission permit under Statewide Rule 97 for storage of hydrocarbon gas at this facility. 4. Geological mappings and cross sections depict Boling Salt Dome as a large salt dome with a broad flat top and steeply dipping flanks. This facility is located within the central portion of the salt dome, away from the perimeter boundaries of the salt. 5. Testing of salt core samples from Boling Salt Dome establish that the salt rock comprising this dome and located beneath this facility is strong and competent in comparison to other Gulf Coast salt domes tested and utilized for underground storage of hydrocarbon liquids and gas. Salt rock beneath the subject facility is an impermeable salt formation that will confine stored hydrocarbons, prevent waste of stored hydrocarbons, prevent uncontrolled escape of hydrocarbons, and protect usable-quality water from pollution by stored hydrocarbons. 6. The locations of the storage wells and caverns at the subject facility will afford ample distance between each cavern and the perimeter of the facility and other caverns. 7. When constructed, the caverns for Wells 6, 7, and 8 at the subject facility will each have a capacity of 10.0 million barrels. If created for liquids storage service under Rule 95, the top of each cavern will be at a depth of approximately 2,200 feet and the bottom of the cavern will be at a depth of approximately 3,900 feet. If created for gas storage service under Rule 97, the top of each cavern will be at a depth of approximately 3,700 feet and the bottom of the cavern will be at a depth of approximately 5,100 feet. The cavern will be approximately 300 feet in diameter. 8. The evidence establishes that usable-quality ground water is to be protected to a depth of 200 feet, and existing wellbores within the required area of review are shown by map and spreadsheet data. Each storage well at the subject facility will be cased and completed to confine stored liquids within the storage well and cavern, to prevent waste of the stored hydrocarbons, to prevent uncontrolled escape of hydrocarbons, and to protect usable-quality water from pollution.

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 03-0267035 PAGE 4 9. The storage caverns at the subject facility will be created by solution mining. After the well is drilled and completed at total depth, fresh water will be injected under controlled conditions to dissolve the salt and create the cavern space. A diesel blanket will be used to control and limit dissolution. Brine density will be monitored periodically as fluid is removed. Sonar caliper surveys will be performed at stages to monitor cavern development. 10. The Applicant has complied with the requirements set forth in Statewide Rule 95 for approval of the requested permit. 11. When operating in liquids storage service under the subject permit, the facility, well, and cavern will be subject to the applicable rules and safety standards adopted by the Commission pursuant to Statewide Rule 95. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Proper legal notice was timely given to all persons and entities entitled to notice under applicable statutes and rules. 2. All things have occurred and have been accomplished to give the Commission jurisdiction in this case. The Commission has jurisdiction to authorize issuance of a permit pursuant to Statewide Rule 95 to create, operate, and maintain an underground hydrocarbon storage facility for storage of hydrocarbon liquids in a salt formation, in addition to an existing permit for the same facility to create, operate, and maintain an underground hydrocarbon storage facility for storage of hydrocarbon liquids in a salt formation pursuant to Statewide Rule 97. 3. The subject storage facility, well, and cavern will not endanger oil, gas, or geothermal resources or cause the pollution of surface water or fresh water strata unproductive of oil, gas, or geothermal resources. The record establishes that this facility will be created, operated, and maintained so as to confine stored hydrocarbon liquids and gas within the storage wells and caverns, to prevent waste of the stored hydrocarbons, to prevent uncontrolled escape of hydrocarbons, and to protect usable-quality water from pollution. 4. The Applicant has complied with the requirements for approval set forth in Statewide Rule 95. 5. When operating in hydrocarbon liquids storage service under the requested Rule 95 permit, the facility, well, and cavern shall be subject to the applicable rules and safety standards adopted by the Commission pursuant to Statewide Rule 95. 6. The application should be granted, and the Commission staff should be authorized and directed to issue the permit.

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 03-0267035 PAGE 5 EXAMINER S RECOMMENDATION Based on the above findings and conclusions, the examiner recommends that the application of Enterprise Products Operating, LLC to create, operate and maintain a facility to store gas be approved pursuant to Statewide Rule 95. Technical Permitting is directed to issue the appropriate permit pursuant to Statewide Rule 95 as a supplemental or additional amendment to the Applicant s existing permit for gas storage pursuant to Statewide Rule 97, with the usual conditions, restrictions, and limitations as required by the Commission. Enterprise Products Operating, LLC shall comply with all applicable rules and safety standards adopted by the Commission pursuant to Statewide Rule 95. Respectfully submitted, Donna Chandler Technical Examiner