Beyond Pipe and Pond. Research Based Stormwater System Design. August 9, 2010

Similar documents
Transcription:

Beyond Pipe and Pond Research Based Stormwater System Design August 9, 2010

Agenda for the Day Introduction UNHSC: UNHSC: A Resource A for Independent Data Data Unit (UOPs) Unit Operations & Processes (UOPs) Break UNHSC UNHSC Performance Data Data Lunch Effective SWM Case Studies Studies Site Design Site Assessment Break Assessment Challenge Continued Group Group Debrief & Discussion 2

Introduction Name Affiliation What is YOUR biggest challenge in implementing advanced stormwater designs? 3

Why We re Here Goal of Clean Water Act is to delist Something isn t working Water Quality is Declining 4

What Can Be Done? EPA can/will enforce regulations Clean Water Act Phase II Antidegradation TMDLs Residual Designation Authority & Engineers can change the way they do business! 5

Why You re Here Gain a competitive advantage Overcome technical barriers to effective design Learn how to use UNHSC data to make your job easier Apply what you learn to real world designs 6

Materials We Will Use Today 7

Agenda for the Day Introduction UNHSC: UNHSC: A Resource A for Independent Data Data Unit Operations & Processes (UOPs) Break UNHSC Performance Data Lunch Effective SWM Case Studies Site Design Assessment Break Assessment Continued Group Debrief & Discussion 8

University of New Hampshire Stormwater Center Providing Data to Protect Water Quality Since 2004 9

Why the Center Was Created Three-Year Study of Conventional Systems 10

Study Found That 34% Of the time systems offered some kind of treatment 26% Of the time systems did nothing 40% Of the time systems exported more pollutants Systems failed 2/3 of the time! 11

Outcome of Study Conventional approaches not adequate Innovative approaches could be more effective More science & evaluation was needed. UNHSC was created 12

Who We Are scientists technicians educators 13

What We Do BMP Performance Monitoring 14

Site Location UNHSC Site 15

BMP Performance Monitoring Research Field Facility at UNH Tc ~ 19 minutes Watershed Boundary UNHSC Research Facility Bioretention Retrofit Tree Filter Porous Asphalt 16

BMP Performance Monitoring 17

BMP Performance Monitoring How We Evaluate Systems 18

BMP Performance Monitoring What We Look For 19

What We Do: Outreach Data Reports Web Resources BMP Fact Sheets Workshops Design Specs Journal Articles 20

Outreach Not a One Way Street 21

What We Do: Targeted Research pavement sealants cold climate thermal impacts 22

Training Partners 23

Questions? 24

Agenda for the Day Introduction UNHSC: A Resource for Independent Data Unit Operations Unit & Processes (UOPs) (UOPs) Break UNHSC Performance Data Lunch Effective SWM Case Studies Site Design Challenge Break Assessment Continued Group Debrief & Discussion 25

Stormwater Outreach Can Be Challenging Because we don t always speak the same language Swale Permeable Retention Interlocking Pond Concrete Detention Pavers Pond Permeable Subsurface Permeable Interlocking Detention Interlocking Concrete Water Concrete Pavers Quality Inlet Pavers Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers Downstream Defender Bio-Swale Naturalized Basin Permeable Interlocking Permeable Concrete Interlocking Pavers Concrete Pavers Storm Trooper Vort-Sentry V2B1 Permeable Interlocking Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers Concrete Bay Pavers Saver Bioretention Permeable Permeable Interlocking Rain Interlocking Garden Concrete Concrete Pavers Tree Filter Pavers Filtera Sand Filter Delaware Austin ADS StormTech Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers Gravel Wetland Permeable Stormwater Interlocking Wetland Concrete Surface PaversWetland Pervious Permeable Concrete Interlocking Porous Asphalt Concrete Pavers Constructed Wetland 26

Imagine the Ultimate System Sonic Swirl Enforcer It Cleans! It Disinfects! It Will Get eliminating everything in it s path You the Job! 27

Now Consider Bioretention 28

No Need to Reinvent this Wheel Use Unit Operations & Processes (UOPs) Physical Operations Biological Processes Chemical Processes Hydrologic Operations 29

Physical UOPs Sedimentation Enhanced Sedimentation Filtration Screening

Biological UOPs Vegetative Process Microbial Process

Chemical UOPs Sorption Antibacterial Flocculation Coagulation

Hydrologic UOPs Flow Alteration Volume Reduction

Using UOPs to Meet Your Challenges Number of UOPs that can Sediment solve & associated ALL of pollutants your problems: Sedimentation, filtration Nitrogen Vegetative uptake & microbial processes Phosphorus Sorption & vegetative processes Water quantity management flow alteration, volume reduction 34

Combining UOPs within Systems Contaminant 1 Contaminant 2 Contaminant 3 Pretreatment Primary Treatment Secondary Treatment 35

Combining Systems to Get the UOPs You Need 36

Questions? 37

Agenda for the Day Introduction UNHSC: A Resource for Independent Data Unit Operations & Processes (UOPs) Break UNHSC Performance Data Lunch Effective SWM Case Studies Site Design Assessment Break Assessment Continued Group Debrief & Discussion 38

Agenda for the Day Introduction UNHSC: A Resource for Independent Data Unit Operations & processes (UOPs) Break UNHSC UNHSC Performance Data Data Lunch Effective SWM Case Studies Site Design Assessment Break Assessment Continued Group Debrief & Discussion 39

Putting UOPs into Practice 40

Environmental Site Design Factors to Consider Resource conservation (watershed & site) Minimization (site level) Strategic timing (watershed & site level) Integrated management practices (site level) Pollution prevention 41

Conserve Good Soils Minimize Cut and Fill use existing contours to the maximum extent August 9, 2010 Conserve sensitive resources

Minimize Impervious Surface Utilize or Infiltrate Rooftop Minimize end of pipe treatments

Systems We Will Cover Retention pond Swales Hydrodynamic separators Porous pavements Subsurface manufactured systems Bioretention systems Subsurface gravel wetland

Retention Ponds 45

Pond Design 46

Retention Pond Hydraulic Performance 47

Retention Pond Water Quality Treatment % Removal Efficiency 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 48

Retention Pond Water Quality Treatment 49

Swales stone-lined vegetated filter berm retrofit 50

Swale Design 51

Hydraulic Performance of Swales Vegetated Swale Hydraulic Performance Stone-lined Swale Hydraulic Performance Inflow Effluent 52

Swale Water Quality Treatment % Removal Efficiency 100 90 80 70 Stone Swale Veg Swale Berm Swale 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 53

Hydrodynamic Separators (HDS) 54

HDS Design 55

HDS Hydraulic Performance The effect of T and [Cl - ] is to nearly double the settling time from 1.6 to 3.4 cm/sec 56

HDS Water Quality Treatment % Removal Efficiency 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 57

58

Porous Pavements 59

Porous Pavements Design 60

Hydraulic Performance of Porous Pavements Pervious Porous Concrete Asphalt Hydraulic Performance 61

Subsurface Filtration/ Infiltration System Water Quality Treatment % Removal Efficiency 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Porous Asphalt Pervious Concrete 62

Subsurface Manufactured Systems filtration detention / infiltration 63

Stormtech Detention/ Infiltration System Design

Subsurface Detention / Infiltration Hydraulic Performance 65

ADS Detention / Infiltration Design

Subsurface Manufactured Filtration System Design

Subsurface Filtration/ Infiltration System Water Quality Treatment % Removal Efficiency 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 ADS StormTech AquaFilter 68

Bioretention Systems tree filters bioretention 69

Bioretention System Design 70

Bioretention System Hydraulic Performance 71

Bioretention System Water Quality Treatment % Removal Efficiency NA 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Bio I Bio II Tree Filter 72

Subsurface Gravel Wetland 73

Subsurface Gravel Wetland Design 74

Subsurface Gravel Wetland Hydraulic Performance 75

Gravel Wetland Water Quality Treatment % Removal Efficiency 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 76

Side by Side. How do they compare?

TSS % Removal Efficiency TSS Removal Efficiencies 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

DIN % Removal Efficiency DIN Removal Efficiencies 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

TP % Removal Efficiency TP Removal Efficiencies 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

Questions? 81

Agenda for the Day Introduction UNHSC: A Resource for Independent Data Unit Operations & Processes (UOPs) Break UNHSC Performance Data Lunch Effective SWM Case Studies Site Design Challenge Break Assessment Continued Group Debrief & Discussion 82

Agenda for the Day Introduction UNHSC: A Resource for Independent Data Unit Operations & Processes (UOPs) Break UNHSC Performance Data Lunch Effective SWM Case Studies Study Site Design Assessment Break Assessment Continued Group Debrief & Discussion 83

Agenda for the Day Introduction UNHSC: A Resource for Independent Data Unit Operations & Processes Break UNHSC Performance Data Lunch Effective SWM Case Studies Site Design Site Assessment Break Challenge Continued Group Debrief & Discussion 84

Site Design Assessment 85

Group Presentations

Predevelopment Conditions

Conventional Design

Hybrid Design

LID Design

Peak Flow Control (cfs) 2 YR 3.1 10 YR 4.7 25 YR 5.2 50 YR 6.1 100 YR 6.25 Predevelopment 5.21 5.21 14.73 14.73 18.13 18.13 24.58 24.58 25.69 25.69 Conventional Hybrid 5.18 12.39 14.95 19.81 20.64 5.18 12.39 14.95 19.81 20.64 5.06 13.17 16.06 21.5 22.43 5.06 13.17 16.06 21.5 22.43 LID 3.84 10.24 12.92 17.64 18.43

Groundwater Recharge Volume (cf) Required for 1 event Achieved Predevelopment NA NA Conventional 0 1,693 Hybrid 1,684 6,684 LID 1,087 8,232

Water Quality Treatment (%) Removal Efficiency TSS RE TN RE TP RE Postdevelopment Annual Load No BMPs (lbs) Conventional Annual Load (lbs) Hybrid Annual Load (lbs) LID Annual Load (lbs) 2379 76.44 5.81 761 68% 51.21 33% 33% 5.81 0% 0% 381 84% 35.52 54% 54% 3.40 42% 60 97% 34.78 55% 55% 1.20 79%

Water Quality Treatment Total Nitrogen Compliance TN Difference Predevelopment Annual Load (lbs) 42.60 % Conventional Annual Load (lbs) Hybrid Annual Load (lbs) LID Annual Load (lbs) 51.21 +20 + (+ 20 8.61 lbs) 35.52-17 (-7.08-17 lbs) 34.78-18 (-7.82-18 lbs)

Installation Cost Comparison Paving Stormwater Combined Conventional $479,550 $100,150 $579,700 $479,550 $100,150 $579,700 Hybrid $467,010 $95,160 $562,170 $467,010 $95,160 $562,170 LID $412,720 $198,724 $611,444 $412,720 $198,724 $611,440

Review of the Day Introduction UNHSC: A Resource for Independent Data Unit Operations & Processes (UOPs) Break UNHSC Performance Data Lunch Effective SWM Case Studies Site Design Assessment Break Assessment Continued Group Report Group Debrief Out & Discussion & Discussion 96