Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 3 Action Item Highlights. November 2014 San Francisco, California

Similar documents
Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 1 Focus. April 2014 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. November 2015 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 4 Focus with Employee Survey Update. February 2016 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. April 2016 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report SEPTEMBER 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Draft SFMTA Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan Progress Report Key Metrics and Actions SEPTEMBER 2012 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Strategic Plan Progress Report AUGUST 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 4 Focus. June 2016 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. March 2017 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 4 Focus. January 2017 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report. November 2017 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report Key Metrics and Actions

Strategic Plan Progress Report

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 4 Focus. May 2017 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report Key Metrics and Actions

Strategic Plan Update

Strategic Plan Progress Report. SFMTA Board of Directors Policy and Governance Committee Meeting February 26, 2019

Intro Strategic Plan SFTP TDM Facilities Transit Bicycle Pedestrian Taxi STRATEGIC PLAN. Presented by Ed Reiskin, Director of Transportation

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Strategic Plan PROPOSED STRATEGIC PLAN METRICS. Progress Report

The New SFMTA Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan. SFMTA Board of Directors Workshop

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

DRAFT 2011 CLIMATE ACTION STRATEGY for the Surface Transportation Sector SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

SFMTA Municipal Transportation Agency Image: police direct traffic as pedestrians, cars and streetcars pass by long ago; Muni centennial logo.

Strategic Plan Progress Report. February 2018 San Francisco, California

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Transportation OTHER FUNDS. Positions. Percent. Change

(Image of a moving Muni light rail vehicle in the Geneva Yard at night)

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Transforming the SFMTA SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

On Time Performance. PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Sept 24, Presented by Kenneth Mc Donald - COO Sonali Bose - CFO

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Travel Time Index: Why All the Fuss? Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute

On-Street Parking Modernization Parking Pilot Update. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 23 February 2015

CITY of DALLAS: On-Street Parking Implementing New Parking Tools

Vital Signs Scorecard Bus Performance

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Public Meeting Round 1

TransLink Program Update & Bay Area Initiatives

Facilities Management. FM Key Performance Indicators

MBTA: Moving Forward with Sustainability John Markowitz

Chapter 6 Planning and Controlling Production: Work-in-Process and Finished-Good Inventories. Omar Maguiña Rivero

Facilities Key Performance Indicators

Commuter Shuttle Program Policy

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Facilities Management. FM Key Performance Indicators

Facilities Management. FM Key Performance Indicators

Overview of Draft Metro Strategic Plan April 12, 2018

Transportation OTHER FUNDS. Positions. Percent. Change

Transportation OTHER FUNDS. Positions. Percent. Change

Transportation Sustainability Program

Administration Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Transit Effectiveness Project (TEP) and Related Transit Initiatives

DOWNTOWN AUSTIN PARKING STRATEGY DETAILED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

University of Vermont Transportation Research Center

SFMTA Operational Efficiency & Project Delivery

Stakeholder Summit Presentation

ONTARIO-MICHIGAN BORDER TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP Planning/Need and Feasibility Study. 1. Work Accomplished This Period (4 Weeks)

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: UPDATE REPORT AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AND TRANSIT FLEET ASSESSMENT

Streamlining Utility Billing Analysis and Reporting

Performance Management

Ground Transportation Management Services

STAFF REPORT. Ken Hiatt, Community Development and Sustainability Department Director Mitch Sears, Sustainability Program Manager

WAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE SUSTAINABLE ENERGY PLAN. Energy Plan

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings February 2016

Capital project planning, design, delivery and operation process review City of Nanaimo November 20, 2017

DATE: JANUARY 24, 2018 HERITAGE VALLEY POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HVTAC) HEATHER MILLER, TRANSIT PLANNER KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPI) REPORT

Enterprise Technology Projects Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Fourth Quarter Report

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Response to the State-Mandated Performance Audit, January 12, 2017

Third Party Fiduciary Agent. Guam Department of Education. In partial fulfillment of Contract: Monthly Project Status Report.

CLIMATE ACTION PLAN ASSESSOR-RECORDER. March 2012 Data Year: Fiscal Year

State Agency Energy Savings Program

The Ohio State University April 6, 2018 Board of Trustees

Business plan toolkit

Public Transportation

DATE: MARCH 01, 2018 HERITAGE VALLEY POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HVPAC)

Third Party Fiduciary Agent. Guam Department of Education. In partial fulfillment of Contract: Monthly Project Status Report.

Staffing Request for Expo Line Phase 2 and Gold Line Foothill Phase 2A - Systems Integration

Municipal Transportation Quality Review

We re on track. Temporary rail closure business continuity strategy. Penny Dillon October In confidence

Water Auditing 101. William D. Chvala, Jr., CEM. Greg Sullivan, PE, CEM. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER

MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES INVENTORY

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

HILLS CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS BEVERLY PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION FROM:

UBT Performance Tracking Tool

Outstanding Audit Recommendations Follow Up Audit Report

Staff Report. Allocation of Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement Program Funding

A Win/Win Strategy: Fixing Transportation and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Massachusetts

MOBILITY ON DEMAND - A HOLISTIC APPROACH. NCTCOG Mobility on Demand Working Group May 15, 2017

Transcription:

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 3 Action Item Highlights November 2014 San Francisco, California 1

Goal 1 metrics Create a safer transportation experience for everyone Objective 1.1 Improve security for transportation system users Objective 1.2 Improve workplace safety and security Objective 1.3 Improve the safety of the transportation system 2

Goal 1 metrics Key performance indicators Crimes per 100,000 miles 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1.1.1 SFPD-reported Muni-related crimes/100,000 miles Target Larcenies, robberies, thefts 9.9 9.3 8.2 8.5 8.0 8.2 May 2014 Jun 2014 Jul 2014 Aug 2014 Sep 2014 Oct 2014 100 80 60 40 20 0 Larcenies, robberies and thefts Injuries per 200,000 hours 20 15 10 5 0 1.2.1 Workplace injuries/200,000 hours Target 14.7 12.3 12.5 10.5 8.6 9.4 Apr 2014 May 2014 Jun 2014 Jul 2014 Aug 2014 Sep 2014 1.3.1 Muni collisions/100,000 miles Collisions per 100,000 miles 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 7.4 Target6.7 6.2 6.0 6.3 5.3 Apr 2014 May 2014 Jun 2014 Jul 2014 Aug 2014 Sep 2014 Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 3

Goal 2 metrics Make transit, walking, bicycling, taxi, ridesharing, and carsharing the preferred means of travel. Objective 2.1 Improve customer service and communications Objective 2.2 Improve transit performance Objective 2.3 Increase use of all non-private auto modes Objective 2.4 Improve parking utilization and manage parking demand 4

Goal 2 metrics Key performance indicators Weighted Response % 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2.1.1 Customer Rating: Overall customer satisfaction with transit services; scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) 1 % Satisfied or Very Satisfied % Dissatisfied or Very Dissatisfied Average Rating 40% 33% 33% 29% 32% 31% FY14 Q2 FY14 Q3 FY14 Q4 5 4 3 2 1 Average Weighted Rating <28 day resolution rate 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2.1.7 Percentage of actionable 311 Muni-related complaints addressed within 28 days 94.9% 89.5% 83.8% 86.9% 88.7% 90.1% Mar 2014 Apr 2014 May 2014 Jun 2014 Jul 2014 Aug 2014 Percentage of arrivals 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2.2.1 Percentage of transit trips with + 5 min gaps on Rapid Network Target 21.1% 20.7% 19.2% 19.3% 19.0% 18.4% Apr 2014 May 2014 Jun 2014 Jul 2014 Aug 2014 Sep 2014 Percentage of arrivals 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 2.2.1 Percentage of transit trips with <2 min bunching on Rapid Network (<1 min for headways of 5 min or less) Target 5.3% 5.6% 5.5% 6.1% 6.2% 6.6% Apr 2014 May 2014 Jun 2014 Jul 2014 Aug 2014 Sep 2014 1 Results are based on a non-probability sample from opt-in SFMTA online survey conducted in Nov/Dec 13 and are weighted to reflect the geographic distribution of San Francisco s population. Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 5

Goal 2 metrics Key performance indicators continued 2.3.1 Non-private auto mode share (2011 all trips) 2.4.1 Parking reliability rate of SFpark spaces 1 Percentage of trips 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 55.0% 21.0% 19.0% 3.5% 1.5% Driving Transit Walking Biking Taxis Reliability rate 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 76.8% 79.4% 79.6% 73.0% 72.1% 70.0% Jul 2013 Aug 2013 Sep 2013 Oct 2013 Nov 2013 Dec 2013 1 Due to street sensor removal, occupancy-based parking measures will not be reported after Dec 2013. Parking program staff are currently developing an alternative metric. Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 6

Goal 3 action item highlights Improve the environment and quality of life in San Francisco. Objective 3.1 Reduce the Agency s and the transportation system s resource consumption, emissions, waste, and noise. Objective 3.2 Increase the transportation system s positive impact to the economy. Objective 3.3 Allocate capital resources effectively. Objective 3.4 Deliver services efficiently. Objective 3.5 Reduce capital and operating structural deficits. 7

Objective 3.1 action items Reduce the Agency s and the transportation system s resource consumption, emissions, waste, and noise. New action item highlights Develop policies for managing existing EV infrastructure In early November, SFMTA Parking finalized policies and procedures and distributed to all parking operators that manage City-ow ned parking garages. These policies codify policy adopted in February 2014 that require vehicles parked in EV stalls in garages to a) be actively charging, and b) to limit their stay to no more than four hours between 8am and 6pm. 8

Objective 3.1 action items Reduce the Agency s and the transportation system s resource consumption, emissions, waste, and noise. New action item highlights Assess all Agency facilities to prioritize water reduction improvements to achieve Mayor s directive of a minimum 10% reduction from 2013 baseline First annual Water Conservation report completed in August. Initial effort has been the comprehensive audit of the SFMTA' s 80 operational facilities (19 Agency-ow ned and 11 leased - staffed facilities, plus 23 way stations and 27 restrooms in power substations), including landscaping. Weighting and prioritizing improvements to 294 inefficient plumbing fixtures. Potential capital projects are vehicle wash racks, and Forest Hill Station park improvements, including pumping station water seepage above ground for irrigation and cleaning uses. The SFMTA currently uses roughly 18.5 million gallons of water annually - about 1/40 of Lake Merced' s capacity. 9

Objective 3.1 action items Reduce the Agency s and the transportation system s resource consumption, emissions, waste, and noise. New action item highlights Assess viable alternative fuel vehicle products to inform fleet turnover options that reduce emissions and operating costs Item follows the Agency s 2004 Clean Air Plan for transit vehicles, co-released w ith SF Environment and the Mayor, adopted by the Board of Supervisors and MTA Board in 2005. Plan charts the path from conventional diesel buses to an eventual zero emission fleet through the use of interim technology bridge hybrid buses and biofuels. The SFMTA vehicle fleet represents roughly one-third of the City s municipal greenhouse gas footprint. The SFMTA and CA Transit Association led the regulatory updating process w ith the CA Air Resources Board to allow for the continued sale of hybrid transit buses in California. Increase access to bicycle and carshare fleets for SFMTA staff business use Staff is coordinating this action item w ith another that seeks to audit and catalog the SFMTA s non-revenue fleet and refine fleet vehicle usage policy and procedures. Staff is developing before baseline estimates of business use trips made by SFMTA staff, by mode and purpose. Follow ing that, staff w ill establish policy and procedures for SFMTA staff car share membership and use. 10

Objective 3.2 action items Increase the transportation system s positive impact to the economy. New action item highlights Develop plan for implementation of innovative fare products that align w ith customer demand A plan has been developed outlining the next steps and engagement strategy to begin work on this project. The final product w ill inform the MTC-led strategic planning process for the next generation of Clipper and ensure that the SFMTA s customer needs are met. Develop and implement technology required to advance innovative fare payment systems The farebox and onboard equipment Request for Qualification has been drafted and is currently being reviewed by the City Attorney. The Agency' s mobile ticketing pilot is nearing finalization from a contracting perspective. We anticipate an initial launch for single-ride tickets and multi-day passports in Summer 2015. 11

Objective 3.3 action items Allocate capital resources effectively New action item highlights Multiple items in development by the SFMTA Project Delivery Improvement Group Clarify project development process Develop project priorities Initiate mandatory milestone review s Project portfolio review Review cost scheduling and estimating practices Standardize project closeout practices 12

Objective 3.3 action items Allocate Capital Resources Effectively New action item highlights Design, develop and implement Enterprise Asset Management System The Enterprise Asset Management System (EAMS) project is a part federally funded, multi-year project, to implement an SFMTA agency-w ide asset management system, in support of State of Good Repair. The project team recently completed an RFP evaluation and selection process to identify consultants to assist the SFMTA in implementation of the Infor EAM software package. We are currently in the process of contract discussions w ith the highest ranking proposer. 13

Objective 3.4 action items Deliver services efficiently. New action item highlights Reduce pay-to-platform ratio by hiring and scheduling more part-time operators The overall hiring pipeline is strong, w ith over 100 new full time operators hired since July 1 including a class of 56 w hich started in November. Part -time operator hiring w ill begin in January 2015. Assess operations & maintenance staffing levels needed to support the level of service and minimize overtime Transit staff is continuing to asses and evaluate staffing levels and overtime usage. With the recent increase in operator hiring, overtime trends for operators are declining, but we do expect to require overtime through April 2019 to meet service needs. We are also focusing on the return-to-work of operators w ith a goal of 50 employees for this fiscal year. Transit staff is also assessing Rail Maintenance front line staffing levels and plan to redistribute and rebalance staff to reduce overtime. 14

Objective 3.4 action items Deliver services efficiently. New action item highlights Review and reform purchasing process This is an ongoing action item. Successes to date include streamlined procedures that expedite the procurement process, a reduced backlog of purchasing requests and increased consumption of parts. A new plan was developed to continue to improve parts availability for both Rail and Bus Maintenance, including ongoing monitoring of Rail Division Vendor Managed Inventory pilot; A new pilot to handle grant funded purchases for Rail Division; and The development of an as-needed parts contract for New Flyer buses 15

Objective 3.5 action items Reduce capital and operating structural deficits. New action item highlights Secure funding to increase State of Good Repair budget to at least $250M annually The FY 2015 2019 Capital Improvement Program Projects SOGR Investments at $316 million annually through FY 2019 Finalizing the SFMTA State of Good Repair (SOGR) Report, w hich w ill show the Agency s immediate financial commitment, spending levels and ongoing projections. Evaluating a number of new funding sources including State Cap & Trade Revenues Secured $131M in Proposition K Sales Taxes for Replacement of the Light Rail Fleet (largest Prop K allocation to date) Submitted three SOGR grant applications totaling $26M (Trolley Coaches $21M; Fall Protection $3M; MME Facility Paint & Body Shop/Historic Car Storage $2M) 16

Objective 3.5 action items Reduce capital and operating structural deficits. New action item highlights Support T2030 as needed including oversight of new revenues Voters approved the proposed first T2030 $500 million Transportation and Road Improvement General Obligation Bond w ith 71% of the vote (Proposition A) Review ing proposed program of projects for Proposition A GO Bond to set a schedule of bond issuances Prioritizing investments in facilities, street safety/vision Zero and implementation of the Muni Forward Capital Program 17

Goal 3 metrics Key performance indicators 60,000 50,000 3.1.1 SFMTA carbon footprint (metric tons C02e) 48,556 45,455 3 2.5 3.2.1 Estimated economic impact of Muni service delays (Monthly $M) $2.5 $2.6 $2.6 $2.4 $2.1 $2.8 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 Dollars ($M) 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 FY12 FY13 0 Jan 2014 Feb 2014 Mar 2014 Apr 2014 May 2014 Jun 2014 3.3.1 Percentage of all capital projects delivered onbudget by phase Measure in development Cost per revenue hour $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 3.4.1 Average annual transit cost per revenue hour 1 $162 $172 $177 $185 $197 $201 $209 $209 $202 $203 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 18

Goal 3 financials Expenditures (FY15 as of September 2014) EXPENDITURES Revised Budget Date Actuals: Year to Encumbrances Total Projection for the Year (1) Saving/(Overage) SFMTA Agency Wide $107,227,697 $13,021,160 $42,967,901 $111,535,702 ($4,308,005) Board of Directors $606,325 $103,481 $3,456 $503,362 $102,963 Capital Programs and Construction $190,088 ($101,478) $2,524,430 $190,088 ($0) Communications $5,969,322 $573,343 $650,700 $5,189,191 $780,131 Director of Transportation $2,677,049 $625,412 $613,193 $2,352,585 $324,464 Finance and Information Technology $88,207,902 $11,475,198 $27,613,090 $86,552,744 $1,655,158 Government Affairs $1,032,451 $158,756 $208,627 $1,031,960 $491 Human Resources $32,027,075 $5,121,331 $7,783,237 $30,810,691 $1,216,384 Safety $4,097,506 $671,080 $1,376,152 $4,987,004 ($889,498) Sustainable Streets $150,004,667 $23,531,985 $29,658,949 $145,572,141 $4,432,526 Transit Services $568,362,820 $101,274,698 $61,738,530 $570,941,773 ($2,578,953) Taxi and Accessible Services $29,877,960 $3,716,202 $21,385,699 $29,585,404 $292,556 TOTAL $990,280,862 $160,171,168 $196,523,964 $989,252,645 $1,028,217 Note: (1) Expenditures projection is based on all encumbrance spent in FY2015. 19

Goal 3 financials Revenues (FY15 as of September 2014) Actuals Year to Date Total Projection for the Year REVENUE Revised Budget Surplus/(Deficit) TRANSIT FARES Cable Car Fares $25,809,060 $9,029,013 $25,809,060 $0 Cash Fares $77,900,551 $22,305,937 $81,850,551 $3,950,000 Other Fares $7,280,441 $903,010 $5,330,441 ($1,950,000) Passes $93,103,795 $23,112,891 $93,103,795 $0 TRANSIT FARES Total $204,093,847 $55,350,851 $206,093,847 $2,000,000 PARKING FEES & FINES General Fund Baseline Transfer $67,900,000 $16,975,000 $67,900,000 $0 Citations and Fines $96,426,440 $25,467,461 $96,426,440 $0 Garage Revenue $62,655,325 $16,991,732 $62,655,325 $0 Meter Revenue $44,594,452 $13,243,228 $44,594,452 $0 Permit Revenue $13,200,818 $3,086,503 $13,200,818 $0 PARKING FEES & FINES Total $284,777,035 $75,763,924 $284,777,035 $0 Operating Grants $128,617,100 $17,447,377 $131,617,100 $3,000,000 Taxi Service $14,244,560 $2,907,696 $9,244,560 ($5,000,000) Other Revenues $28,853,509 $7,229,840 $28,853,509 $0 General Fund Transfer $247,860,000 $61,965,000 $247,860,000 $0 Fund Balance for Current Year Budget $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 Fund Balance for Prior Year Encumbrance Carry Forward $61,865,344 $61,865,344 $61,865,344 $0 TOTAL $990,311,395 $302,530,032 $990,311,395 ($0) 20

Goal 3 financials Overtime Report (FY15 as of September 2014) FUND/DIVISION ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET ACTUALS FISCAL YEAR TO DATE* PROJECTION FOR REMAINING MONTHS END OF YEAR PROJECTION SURPLUS (DEFICIT) OPERATING FUND TRANSIT SERVICES DIVISION Transit Operators $23,586,620 $5,796,168 $22,218,646 $28,014,814 (4,428,194) Transit Vehicle Maintenance $7,037,296 $2,667,814 $10,226,621 $12,894,435 (5,857,139) Transit All Others $4,066,867 $2,331,096 $8,935,863 $11,266,959 (7,200,092) Subtotal Transit Services Division $34,690,783 $10,795,078 $41,381,130 $52,176,208 (17,485,425) SUSTAINABLE STREETS DIVISION Parking Control Officers $994,984 $567,161 $2,174,119 $2,741,280 (1,746,296) Sustainable Streets All Others $794,714 $127,581 $489,060 $616,641 178,073 Subtotal Sustainable Streets Division $1,789,698 $694,742 $2,663,179 $3,357,921 (1,568,223) SFMTA AGENCY WIDE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ALL OTHER DIVISIONS $889,774 $173,257 $664,152 $837,409 52,365 TOTAL OPERATING FUND $37,370,255 $11,663,077 $44,708,461 $56,371,538 (19,001,283) NON OPERATING FUND Capital Programs & Construction $0 $204,220 $782,845 $987,065 (987,065) Sustainable Streets Engineering Programs $0 $76,311 $292,524 $368,835 (368,835) Total Non-Operating Fund $0 $280,531 $1,075,369 $1,355,900 (1,355,900) TOTAL $37,370,255 $11,943,608 $45,783,830 $57,727,438 (20,357,183) *Figures include cost recovery for events or services totaling $156K as of month-end (September 2014) for FY2015. The amount includes reimbursements for payroll (both regular and overtime), overhead, and other non-labor costs as applicable. 21

Goal 4 metrics Create a workplace that delivers outstanding service Objective 4.1 Improve internal communications Objective 4.2 Create a collaborative and innovative work environment Objective 4.3 Improve employee accountability Objective 4.4 Improve relationships and partnerships with our stakeholders 22

Goal 4 metrics Key performance indicators 4.1.1 Employee rating: I have the info and tools I need to do my job; I have access to info about Agency accomplishments, current events, issues and challenges; scale of 1 (high) to 5 (low) 3.5, 3.4 (FY13) 4.2.1 Employee rating: Overall employee satisfaction; scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) 3.4 (FY13) 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 4.3.1 Percentage of employees with performance plans/appraisals by start/end of fiscal year FY14 FY14 62.5% 61.1% FY13 20.3% Plans FY 15 22.8% FY13 18.8% Appraisals Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 23

Goal 4 metrics Key performance indicators continued 4.4.1 Stakeholder rating: satisfaction with SFMTA decision-making process/communications; scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) Survey will be conducted in FY15. 24