Arlington East WRF Influent Channel Rehabilitation - Final

Similar documents
Index Number District II Primary Clarifier #2 and #3 Rehabilitation Project Definition FINAL

Norwood High Service Pump Replacement

McDuff WTP High Service Pump Replacement

Index Number Greenland Burnt Mill PS to GEC Trans FM

QUARTERLY OPERATIONS REPORT 4 th Quarter, April June 2018 WASTEWATER PERMIT COMPLIANCE. Page 1 INFLUENT MONTHLY AVERAGE EFFLUENT MONTHLY AVERAGE

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua has Positive Long-Term Effects. Biological Help for the Human Race

Water/Wastewater System Capital Projects Workshop June 29, 2017

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

QUARTERLY OPERATIONS REPORT 3 rd Quarter, January March 2018 WASTEWATER PERMIT COMPLIANCE. Page 1 EFFLUENT MONTHLY AVERAGE INFLUENT MONTHLY AVERAGE

2017 Annual Performance Report

Woking. q business confidence report

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Alewife Brook Pump Station Rehabilitation Design/CA/RE Services Contract 7034 Amendment No.

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority

August 2017 Monthly Report

ISO Monitoring and Measurement Nonconformance and Corrective and Preventative Action

RE: Annual Report 2016 Wardsville Wastewater Treatment Plant and Collection System

University of Michigan Eco-Driving Index (EDI) Latest data: August 2017

Groundwater Discharge Permit Application ~ Part A Business Information

Rainwater tank study of new homes

Traffic Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

This document can be made available in other accessible formats as soon as practicable and upon request. Staff Report. Infrastructure & Public Works

Stonecrest Estates Sewage Treatment Plant 2017 Annual Report

Finch Drinking Water System O. Reg. 170/03 Schedule 22 - Summary Report for Municipalities

An Efficient Aeration Strategy Sits on a Three-Legged Stool

Electric Forward Market Report

Water Resources Director: Chris Graybeal

Traffic Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Administration Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

City of San Clemente Water Usage Report

Capital Project Tracking Report

EGANVILLE SEWAGE SYSTEM 2013 PERFORMANCE REPORT

Cold Weather Ammonia Removal

Perseus 1B North Rankin Drilling Rig Reinstatement. Perseus 1B North Rankin Drilling Rig Reinstatement. Presentation

WAIKOLOA RESERVOIR NO. 1 EARTHQUAKE REPAIR PROJECT Information Sheet

The Corporation of the City of St. Thomas. Water Pollution Control Plant Annual Performance Report. Under Ontario Ministry of the Environment

Finch Drinking Water System O. Reg 170/03 Schedule 22 - Summary Report for Municipalities

2017 KEY INSIGHTS ON. Employee Attendance and Tardiness

Chapter 6 Planning and Controlling Production: Work-in-Process and Finished-Good Inventories. Omar Maguiña Rivero

Combined Sewer Overflows July 2012-December 2013

SECTION 813 SEWER FLOW CONTROL

Utilizing Airlift Water Reuse Technology to Help Achieve Electrical Energy Savings in Fish Hatcheries

California Independent System Operator Corporation. California ISO. Import resource adequacy. Department of Market Monitoring

5/1/2013. Puget Sound Conditions. LID research, data, guidelines, specifications, and regulations are evolving rapidly.

Making a Dramatic Impact on Water Loss. Robert Horvat, PE cell:

Dec Board of Education: Approve Educational Specifications. Dec Jan. 2016

Design Services Assessment Report, 2013

HKU announces 2017 Q4 HK Macroeconomic Forecast

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority

Pilot Testing a High-Speed Turbo Blower at the City of Plano, Illinois Water Reclamation Facility"

WASTEWATER DIVISION DECEMBER 2016 MONTHLY REPORT

HOW TO SAVE COSTS AND IMPROVE SUSTAINABILITY WHILE REDUCING EFFLUENT NITROGEN

CITY OF LONDON WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2013 ANNUAL REPORT ADELAIDE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Feel free to contact me should you require any additional information regarding the report. I can be reached at

His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council. SUBJECT: Project Performance Update Safe, Clean Drinking Water Project

HKU announces 2016 Q3 HK Macroeconomic Forecast

Iroquois Wastewater Treatment Plant 2016 Annual Performance Report

Annual Report. December 2010 November Bradley Cole 2/7/2012

Safety Briefing. Exit Routes. Exit route Assembly Point 911 Security Extinguishers Hazards Phones on silent

AGENDA ITEM D6. Climate Outlook

Welcome Waste Water Quality Breakout

Facilities Management. FM Key Performance Indicators

Enhanced Pavement Management Program. Pavement Management Program

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

Facilities Management. FM Key Performance Indicators

CITY OF LONDON ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATIONS GREENWAY POLLUTION CONTROL CENTRE 2012 ANNUAL REPORT

LIST OF DIRECTIVES AND MEMORANDA

Water and Waste Department

HKU announces 2018 Q1 HK Macroeconomic Forecast 1

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR DIGESTER CLEANING

WATER & WASTEWATER PLATFORM

Exhibit A. Scope of Services for Flow Monitoring Program 2015 Flow Monitoring City of Lawrence, Kansas

TL 9000 Quality Management System. Measurements Handbook. BRR Examples

2014 Annual Wastewater Report

Appendix 3A Water Demand Projections

2019 Salt River Siphon Outage Customer Focus Meeting

NAPA SANITATION DISTRICT

CIP Routine/Small Purchasing Team Close-out

Effective Contract Preparation. Contents are subject to change. For the latest updates visit

Financial Transaction Adjustment Request (FTAR) Processing Guide

Remote Headworks Upgrade. November 4, 2010

College Football Hall of Fame HAMMOCK R

CI User Engagement Activities and Schedule Nov Apr 2013

Non-consolidated Forecast of Income <1>

Sample Reports. for. HAP v4.80 Example Problem

Facilities Management. FM Key Performance Indicators

Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant Renewable Energy Leasing Project

Heating the University of Glasgow with river sourced heat pumps. Adam McConkey Andrew Poon-King Zhibin Yu


Presentation for the Local Government Commission and the Community Environmental Council. July 13, 2007

Cull Cow Marketing And Feeding Alternatives. Dillon M. Feuz - Utah State University and John P. Hewlett University of Wyoming

Industry Perspective on Well Decommissioning Pennsylvania Orphaned and Abandoned Well Workshop May 16, 2018

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORTS

REPORT TO THE 2013 LEGISLATURE SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT ON HAWAI I CANCER RESEARCH SPECIAL FUND. Pursuant to Section 304A-2168, Hawai i Revised Statutes

CITY OF LONDON ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATIONS GREENWAY POLLUTION CONTROL CENTRE 2013 ANNUAL REPORT

Implementation Status & Results Uzbekistan Uzbekistan Bukhara and Samarkand Sewerage Project (P112719)

Transcription:

T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M 135-11 ARLINGTON EAST WRF INFLUENT CHANNEL 135-11 Arlington East WRF Influent Channel Rehabilitation - Final PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: JEA Capital Budget Planning David Kowalski DATE: 2/4/15 Updated Bill Clendening 5/18/16 Introduction & Background The Arlington WRF headworks influent structure was constructed in 2000. The headworks structure has a vertical channel with a roof over it and then discharges to a channel that flows through fine screens and then flows out through a channel and then continues with underground piping to splitter box number 1. The roof of the structure and the channels that convey the sewage through this area are the subject of concern. These channels are exposed to high levels hydrogen sulfide gases(1000 ppm) that are generated by the sewage has deteriorated these structures over the years and are in need of repair. Justification The channels that convey the sewage through the headworks structure have deterioration due to hydrogen sulfide gases that produce sulfuric acid which has damaged and deteriorated the concrete. The amount of deterioration to the roof is unknown as there is no access to this area because of continuous flow and there is no bypass around the structure. The channels that can be inspected have deteriorated due to sulfuric acid attack caused by hydrogen sulfide gas. If these channels are not repaired and coated with an acid resistance coating there may be failure of the concrete and raw sewage spilling onto the ground and possible structural failure in the future. Scope The scope of this project is to rehabilitate the influent and effluent channels of the headworks structures. This involves bypassing the plant flows from the influent pump station to the aeration tanks in order that the channels that normally convey the sewage can be repaired. The work includes the installation of line stops and bypass piping on the influent force mains in order that the plant can still operate properly. Replacing the 54 header pipe with valves for future bypass efforts. The work also includes concrete repair and the coating of the channels with an acid resistant coating (Spectrashield). The scope of work includes but is not limited to: Design of temporary bypass system to divert flow around the headworks structure. Installation of line stops on force mains and temporary bypass pumping. Remove And Replace approx. 50 of 54 DI header pipe including (2) 54 valves.

Structural repair of the damaged concrete. 135-11 ARLINGTON EAST WRF INFLUENT CHANNEL Application of an acid resistant coating on the influent/effluent channels and roof of the headworks structure. Remove and replace six (6) sluice gates and seals in existing frames Implementation Schedule FY 2016 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Engineering Design Duration = 210 days Procurement Bid Duration = 150 days Construction Duration = 120 days Closeout Duration = 0 days FY 2017 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Engineering Design Duration = 0 days Procurement Bid Duration = 60 days Construction Duration = 300 days Closeout Duration = 30 days Project Management & Delivery Stage Project Definition 10% Schematic Design 30% Conceptual Design 90% Detail Design 100% Final Design Bid Construction To Project Delivery W&WW PEC PEC PEC PEC PEC PEC OPB Established Trend Trend Trend 2

Cost Estimate and Expenditure Forecast ACTIVITY/DESCRIPTION SUB-TOTAL TOTAL Contractor Direct Cost $600,000.00 Contractor Indirect Cost $180,000.00 Overhead & Profit -15% $90,000.00 Miscellaneous-General/Special Conditions $30,000.00 Supplemental Work Allowance -10% max $60,000.00 JEA Cost & Engineering $156,000.00 Engineering $78,000.00 Project Management $39,000.00 Services During Construction $39,000.00 Real Estate $0.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $936,000 PROJECTED EXPENDITURE FORECAST BY FISCAL YEAR ACTIVITY FY 2016 FY 2017 TOTAL QUARTER 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH JEA Cost & Engineering 10% 3,900 $3,900 JEA Cost & Engineering 30% 23,400 7,800 3,900 $35,100 JEA Cost & Engineering Final 39,000 3,900 3,900 15,600 23,400 23,400 7,800 $117,000 Construction 78,000 312,000 312,000 78,000 $780,000 Project Closeout $0 TOTAL 3,900 62,400 11,700 7,800 93,600 335,400 335,400 85,800 $936,000 SIGNIFICANT MATERIAL SUMMARY DESCRIPTION UNIT MEASURE QUANTITY CONSTRUCTION 3

Risks: Possible structural failure in the future and raw sewage spilling onto the ground. Revision History Name Date Version Revision Notes 4

CP: Revision #: Date: Scope Approval The signatures below represent approval for this project. The groups represented must approve in writing changes to the scope, cost, or schedule, prior to implementing those changes. Corporate Planning Date O&M Date Outreach Date Environmental Date Others Signature Date Others Signature Date Rev 1 Description: Schedule Effect: Cost Effect: Approvals: Corporate Planning Date O&M Date Outreach Date Environmental Date Others Signature Date Others Signature Date Rev 2 Description: Schedule Effect: Cost Effect: Approvals: Corporate Planning Date O&M Date Outreach Date Environmental Date 5

Others Signature Date Others Signature Date 6