ModernThink 2016 Great Colleges Survey The University of Virginia's College at Wise Response Distribution Report

Similar documents
Great Colleges to Work For. Institutional Research and Information Tim Stanley, Associate Director Taylor Lovell, Research Analyst

2018 UNC System Employee Engagement. Survey Results

The University of Tennessee Knoxville 2011 Great Colleges Survey

Overview of Reports Survey Results

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. Human Resources Overall

Benchmark Data Package Report Overview

2014 Employee Satisfaction Survey. New Mexico State University

THE EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED

COLLEGE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Laramie County Community College - Spring 2016 Respondents. Mean

Institutional Climate Update

2017 Engagement Survey. Results Overview

ModernThink Employee Engagement Survey Summary Report

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. College of Ag, Food and Environment Overall

COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATIONS. A Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State: STRATEGIC PLANNING AND REPORTING

Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey

THE DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE-TUCSON, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MENTORING PROGRAM

Equitable Access and Success for Students Human Resources Awareness and Celebration of Diverse Cultures

CHRONICLE GREAT COLLEGE TO WORK FOR 2016

General Information. 1. What department do you work for? 2. How long have you worked for the City? 3. Supervision: Do you supervise other employee(s)?

August 4, 2010 Information Requests Round 1

Equitable Access and Success for Students Human Resources Awareness and Celebration of Diverse Cultures

2018 EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS

Design Recruitment and support of a diverse student population.

2017 CALS Employee Survey Results Executive Summary. Heather Roberts-Wrenn March 2017

Employee Satisfaction Survey. Office of Institutional Research & Assessment

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS

ENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT

SANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey. Results and Findings

Pellissippi State Community College. Performance Evaluation Process (Administrative and Support Staff)

2010 Employee Survey Results. May 2010

Self Assessment Guide for a Great Safety Culture

Inclusive Excellence at the University of Missouri System Framework Draft

Report Employee Satisfaction Survey

Guide for Faculty Mentors

VOILAND COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE 2018

Goal 1: Prepare Students for Leading Roles in an Innovation-driven Economy and Global Society

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Dartmouth College Employee Survey Results. April 27, 2006

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government

FACULTY MENTORING RESOURCE BOOK-2012

NTID Faculty Workload Guidelines

Fall 2017 Campus Climate and Diversity Survey

Draft Faculty Mentoring

Faculty Mentorship. April 26, 2016.

Strategic Diversity Plan

INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP)

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Accountability and Development Review

GENDER PAY GAP REPORT

What We ve Done to Date: A status report to employees on progress made on the 2004 employee survey

Employer handbook for. Internships. We are in the business of building successful futures. TM

Current Practices in Faculty Mentoring at RIT: A Summary of 2013 Questionnaire Results November 15, 2013

Internship. design an. Creating a valuable experience for employers and students. Establishing an Internship or Co-op Program 2 3

Staff Survey september - october 2016 results. Voice Project

Generational Differences Quiz

Developing a Culture of Collaboration Through Employee Engagement

Department of Facilities Management Equity Action Plan

Organizational Integration of Part-Time Faculty Teaching Developmental Mathematics. Sylvia Gray, Researcher September 15, 2017

Employee Opinion Survey

Vision Human Resources

Dartmouth College 2008 Staff Survey

Plant the SEEDS for your College s Future Using a Competency-Based Performance Management System. Presented by Alexa Bazley & Kaye Waugh

P a g e 1. Growing through people. 1. What is Performance for Growth (P4G)?

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM

ITS. All-Staff Strategic Planning Launch. July 9 & 16, 2018

DO YOU WANT A MENTOR?

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Staff Survey Feedback 2012

NEW COLLEGE LEICESTER. Policy for the Induction of Newly Qualified Teachers (NQTs) at New College Leicester

Human Capital. Date of Report. Theme Group Name. Members. Introduction. Innovation. February 2, Human Capital

Institutional Strengths. Improvement Opportunities & Implementation Suggestions. Institutional Summary

Metropolitan Community College Omaha, Nebraska

CSC MERIT POLICY COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER Revised, 6/12/14

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government

William & Mary 2015 Employee Climate Survey

NAVIGATING THROUGH ACADEMIC CAREER PATHS: A MENTORING CONTINUUM

The Red Book Code of Business Conduct

Campus Culture, Shared Governance, Morale and Wellness

Sample Company. Bringing Best Practices, Engagement Programs, and Outstanding Results to HR Departments. New Hire Surveys: *Dates.

Analyzing Employee Survey Data. Task Force on Race and Race Relations February 2016

2015 Staff Senate Survey Results

2016 Survey of Employee Engagement Work Group Results

2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

Very. dissatisfied. Somewhat. dissatisfied 11% Somewhat. satisfied 42%

2017 Merritt College Employee Satisfaction Survey

This report was obtained (via FOIA) and posted by AltGov2.

Gender pay gap report 2017

2018 Employee Climate Survey

M. Patrice Eiff, MD Professor Director of Faculty Development- Family Medicine Director, SOM TALENT Program

HLC Criteria and Core Component Crosswalk with AQIP Portfolio Processes

SampleCo Organization Survey Results

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION DECEMBER BCFP Annual Employee Survey Results

UVM Extension Workforce Diversity Recruiting and Retention Plan: 2012

Assignment of Responsibility

Gender Differences in Pathways to Career Satisfaction

OVERVIEW. Relationship Between Versatility and Diversity Among Leaders

Inclusive Excellence at MU Framework Draft

I. Introduction. Diversity Strategic Plan v4 1

Transcription:

/ Average All Statements (1-66) Your Overall (233) 3.83 29.8% 38.7% 20.8% 6.5%4.3% Administration (33) 3.97 34.2% 38.9% 18.8% 5.8%2.3% Faculty (64) 4.02 40.9% 33.2% 16.4% 5.7%3.8% Adjunct Faculty (19) 3.91 30.7% 40.7% 20.7% 4.6%3.2% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.64 21.3% 40.6% 24.8% 7.5% 5.8% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.66 20.7% 42.2% 24.2% 7.5% 5.3% 1. My job makes good use of my skills and abilities. Your Overall (233) 4.23 42.5% 42.9% 10.7% 2.6%1.3% Administration (33) 4.3 42.4% 45.5% 12.1% 0%0% Faculty (64) 4.58 62.5% 34.4% 1.6%1.6%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.11 36.8% 52.6% 0%5.3%5.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.97 31.6% 42.1% 21.1% 2.6%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) 4.05 29.3% 51.7% 13.8% 5.2%0%

/ 2. I am given the responsibility and freedom to do my job. Your Overall (233) 4.49 59.7% 32.2% 6.4%0.9%0.9% Administration (33) 4.73 78.8% 15.2% 6.1%0%0% Faculty (64) 4.69 76.6% 18.8% 3.1%0%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.42 47.4% 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4.24 42.1% 47.4% 5.3%2.6%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) 4.36 50% 37.9% 10.3% 1.7%0% 3. My supervisor/department chair makes his/her expectations clear. Your Overall (233) 4.09 44.2% 32.6% 14.6% 4.7%3.9% Administration (33) 4.21 54.5% 27.3% 6.1% 9.1% 3% Faculty (64) 4.52 65.6% 25% 6.3%1.6%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.26 36.8% 52.6% 10.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.79 28.9% 36.8% 26.3% 0% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.79 29.3% 37.9% 19% 10.3% 3.4%

/ 4. I am provided the resources I need to be effective in my job. Your Overall (233) 3.81 25.8% 42.1% 23.2% 5.2%3.9% Administration (33) 3.82 30.3% 33.3% 27.3% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) 3.95 32.8% 39.1% 20.3% 6.3%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.11 36.8% 47.4% 5.3% 10.5% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.5 10.5% 52.6% 23.7% 2.6% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.74 19% 46.6% 27.6% 3.4%3.4% 5. I understand how my job contributes to this institution's mission. Your Overall (233) 4.44 54.5% 36.5% 7.3% 1.7%0% Administration (33) 4.58 66.7% 27.3% 3%3%0% Faculty (64) 4.63 73.4% 15.6% 10.9% 0%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.42 47.4% 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4.26 44.7% 42.1% 7.9% 5.3%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) 4.34 41.4% 53.4% 3.4%1.7%0%

/ 6. I am given the opportunity to develop my skills at this institution. Your Overall (231) 4.17 41.6% 40.7% 12.6% 3.9%1.3% Administration (33) 4.3 48.5% 39.4% 6.1%6.1%0% Faculty (64) 4.36 57.8% 28.1% 7.8% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) 3.83 33.3% 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4 36.8% 36.8% 21.1% 0%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (57) 4.11 28.1% 56.1% 14% 1.8%0% 7. I receive feedback from my supervisor/department chair that helps me. Your Overall (233) 3.91 34.8% 37.3% 16.7% 6% 5.2% Administration (33) 4.09 36.4% 45.5% 12.1% 3%3% Faculty (64) 4.19 50% 29.7% 12.5% 4.7%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4 36.8% 36.8% 15.8% 10.5% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.76 34.2% 34.2% 15.8% 5.3% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.66 22.4% 39.7% 24.1% 8.6% 5.2%

/ 8. When I offer a new idea, I believe it will be fully considered. Your Overall (229) 3.9 33.6% 38% 17.9% 5.7%4.8% Administration (33) 4.06 36.4% 42.4% 15.2% 3%3% Faculty (64) 4.28 51.6% 32.8% 10.9% 1.6%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.88 35.3% 35.3% 17.6% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.76 34.2% 34.2% 15.8% 5.3% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (56) 3.54 12.5% 46.4% 25% 14.3% 1.8% 9. I am regularly recognized for my contributions. Your Overall (231) 3.52 24.2% 27.3% 30.7% 11.7% 6.1% Administration (32) 3.88 34.4% 31.3% 25% 6.3%3.1% Faculty (64) 3.77 32.8% 29.7% 23.4% 9.4% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (18) 3.5 27.8% 33.3% 5.6% 27.8% 5.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.32 18.4% 23.7% 39.5% 7.9% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.45 20.7% 27.6% 32.8% 13.8% 5.2%

/ 10. I understand the necessary requirements to advance my career. Your Overall (222) 3.8 27.5% 42.3% 18.5% 6.3%5.4% Administration (32) 3.97 31.3% 40.6% 25% 0%3.1% Faculty (63) 4.1 42.9% 34.9% 15.9% 1.6%4.8% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.94 29.4% 47.1% 11.8% 11.8% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) 3.56 19.4% 41.7% 19.4% 13.9% 5.6% Non-exempt Staff (55) 3.6 16.4% 49.1% 20% 7.3% 7.3% 11. I am paid fairly for my work. Your Overall (231) 3.25 16% 34.6% 20.3% 16% 13% Administration (33) 3.76 33.3% 33.3% 15.2% 12.1% 6.1% Faculty (64) 3.56 18.8% 43.8% 20.3% 9.4% 7.8% Adjunct Faculty (19) 3.16 31.6% 21.1% 10.5% 5.3% 31.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 2.71 5.3% 28.9% 15.8% 31.6% 18.4% Non-exempt Staff (58) 2.97 6.9% 34.5% 24.1% 17.2% 17.2%

/ 12. I believe what I am told by my supervisor/department chair. Your Overall (230) 4.12 47.4% 30% 13.9% 4.8%3.9% Administration (33) 4.3 51.5% 30.3% 15.2% 3%0% Faculty (63) 4.43 68.3% 17.5% 6.3%4.8%3.2% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.32 47.4% 42.1% 5.3%5.3%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4.05 44.7% 23.7% 26.3% 2.6%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.76 27.6% 43.1% 15.5% 5.2% 8.6% 13. We have opportunities to contribute to important decisions in my department. Your Overall (227) 3.89 34.8% 33.9% 20.7% 6.2%4.4% Administration (33) 4.3 45.5% 39.4% 15.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) 4.28 53.1% 29.7% 10.9% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) 3.72 44.4% 16.7% 16.7% 11.1% 11.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.66 28.9% 28.9% 28.9% 5.3% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (55) 3.51 14.5% 43.6% 27.3% 7.3% 7.3%

/ 14. I can speak up or challenge a traditional way of doing something without fear of harming my career. Your Overall (226) 3.86 35.8% 31.4% 21.2% 6.2%5.3% Administration (33) 4 39.4% 33.3% 18.2% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) 4.22 54.7% 20.3% 18.8% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (16) 4 37.5% 37.5% 18.8% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.71 23.7% 42.1% 23.7% 2.6% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (56) 3.43 23.2% 28.6% 26.8% 10.7% 10.7% 15. My supervisor/department chair regularly models this institution's values. Your Overall (229) 4.03 41.9% 35.8% 11.8% 4.8%5.7% Administration (33) 4.21 51.5% 30.3% 9.1% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) 4.41 60.9% 26.6% 6.3%4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.05 36.8% 31.6% 31.6% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.87 36.8% 34.2% 15.8% 5.3% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (57) 3.67 22.8% 50.9% 8.8% 5.3% 12.3%

/ 16. Promotions in my department are based on a person's ability. Your Overall (206) 3.44 22.8% 30.6% 25.2% 10.2% 11.2% Administration (31) 3.9 38.7% 32.3% 12.9% 12.9% 3.2% Faculty (62) 3.9 35.5% 35.5% 17.7% 6.5%4.8% Adjunct Faculty (14) 3.43 7.1% 42.9% 42.9% 0%7.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (32) 3.03 9.4% 31.3% 31.3% 9.4% 18.8% Non-exempt Staff (50) 2.88 12% 22% 30% 14% 22% 17. Our review process accurately measures my job performance. Your Overall (221) 3.47 19.5% 37.6% 22.6% 11.3% 9% Administration (33) 3.76 24.2% 45.5% 15.2% 12.1% 3% Faculty (62) 3.74 29% 40.3% 14.5% 8.1% 8.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.59 23.5% 29.4% 35.3% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) 3.41 13.5% 35.1% 40.5% 0% 10.8% Non-exempt Staff (56) 3.05 8.9% 39.3% 14.3% 23.2% 14.3%

/ 18. Issues of low performance are addressed in my department. Your Overall (210) 3.21 17.6% 29.5% 23.8% 14.8% 14.3% Administration (31) 3.71 22.6% 45.2% 19.4% 6.5%6.5% Faculty (59) 3.37 22% 32.2% 20.3% 11.9% 13.6% Adjunct Faculty (15) 3.33 26.7% 13.3% 40% 6.7% 13.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (34) 3.09 14.7% 29.4% 17.6% 26.5% 11.8% Non-exempt Staff (53) 2.83 5.7% 26.4% 32.1% 17% 18.9% 19. My supervisor/department chair is consistent and fair. Your Overall (230) 4.02 41.3% 33.9% 15.7% 3.5%5.7% Administration (33) 4.18 42.4% 42.4% 9.1% 3%3% Faculty (64) 4.39 60.9% 25% 9.4% 1.6%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.26 42.1% 42.1% 15.8% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.84 28.9% 39.5% 23.7% 2.6%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.6 25.9% 37.9% 19% 5.2% 12.1%

/ 20. My supervisor/department chair actively solicits my suggestions and ideas. Your Overall (229) 4.02 41.5% 31.4% 19.2% 3.1%4.8% Administration (33) 4.21 42.4% 36.4% 21.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) 4.44 62.5% 23.4% 10.9% 1.6%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.21 47.4% 26.3% 26.3% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.76 28.9% 34.2% 26.3% 5.3%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (56) 3.57 25% 35.7% 21.4% 7.1% 10.7% 21. In my department, we communicate openly about issues that impact each other's work. Your Overall (229) 3.73 26.2% 38% 24.5% 5.7%5.7% Administration (33) 4.06 36.4% 36.4% 24.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) 4.13 40.6% 40.6% 12.5% 3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (18) 4 33.3% 38.9% 22.2% 5.6%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.53 21.1% 34.2% 28.9% 7.9% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.26 10.3% 37.9% 31% 8.6% 12.1%

/ 22. Changes that affect me are discussed prior to being implemented. Your Overall (226) 3.52 20.4% 36.7% 26.5% 7.5% 8.8% Administration (33) 3.82 27.3% 33.3% 33.3% 6.1%0% Faculty (64) 4 35.9% 40.6% 15.6% 3.1%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.88 29.4% 52.9% 5.9%0% 11.8% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.11 10.5% 28.9% 36.8% 7.9% 15.8% Non-exempt Staff (56) 3.07 7.1% 32.1% 33.9% 14.3% 12.5% 23. People in my department work well together. Your Overall (228) 3.93 34.6% 36.8% 19.3% 4.8%4.4% Administration (33) 4.27 48.5% 30.3% 21.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) 4.19 51.6% 28.1% 12.5% 3.1%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) 4.06 29.4% 47.1% 23.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.71 23.7% 39.5% 26.3% 5.3%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.62 22.4% 39.7% 22.4% 8.6% 6.9%

/ 24. I have a good relationship with my supervisor/department chair. Your Overall (230) 4.26 49.1% 34.3% 11.7% 2.6%2.2% Administration (33) 4.42 57.6% 33.3% 6.1%0%3% Faculty (64) 4.58 68.8% 23.4% 6.3%0%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.42 47.4% 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4.13 44.7% 34.2% 15.8% 0%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.95 31% 41.4% 19% 8.6% 0% 25. Overall, my department is a good place to work. Your Overall (230) 4.27 48.3% 34.3% 14.3% 2.2%0.9% Administration (33) 4.36 54.5% 33.3% 9.1% 0%3% Faculty (64) 4.44 64.1% 18.8% 15.6% 0%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.42 47.4% 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4.21 44.7% 36.8% 13.2% 5.3%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) 4.07 31% 48.3% 17.2% 3.4%0%

/ 26. I can count on people to cooperate across departments. Your Overall (222) 3.49 13.5% 40.1% 32.9% 8.6% 5% Administration (33) 3.64 21.2% 27.3% 48.5% 0%3% Faculty (63) 3.67 22.2% 39.7% 25.4% 7.9% 4.8% Adjunct Faculty (13) 3.85 15.4% 61.5% 15.4% 7.7% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.13 5.3% 34.2% 36.8% 15.8% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (57) 3.37 8.8% 40.4% 35.1% 10.5% 5.3% 27. Senior leadership provides a clear direction for this institution's future. Your Overall (226) 3.72 25.2% 36.7% 27.4% 6.2%4.4% Administration (33) 3.64 24.2% 39.4% 18.2% 12.1% 6.1% Faculty (64) 4.03 42.2% 28.1% 21.9% 6.3%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (16) 3.88 31.3% 25% 43.8% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.37 15.8% 34.2% 31.6% 7.9% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (57) 3.63 17.5% 38.6% 36.8% 3.5%3.5%

/ 28. My department has adequate faculty/staff to achieve our goals. Your Overall (229) 2.95 8.3% 28.8% 26.6% 21.8% 14.4% Administration (33) 3.06 12.1% 24.2% 27.3% 30.3% 6.1% Faculty (64) 2.69 9.4% 21.9% 20.3% 25% 23.4% Adjunct Faculty (18) 3.06 16.7% 22.2% 22.2% 27.8% 11.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 2.84 2.6% 26.3% 36.8% 21.1% 13.2% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.12 8.6% 36.2% 25.9% 17.2% 12.1% 29. The institution takes reasonable steps to provide a safe and secure environment for the campus. Your Overall (229) 4.24 39.3% 49.8% 8.3% 0.9%1.7% Administration (33) 4.27 36.4% 54.5% 9.1% 0%0% Faculty (63) 4.25 42.9% 46% 6.3%3.2%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.32 52.6% 36.8% 5.3%0%5.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4.32 39.5% 52.6% 7.9% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) 4.09 31% 53.4% 12.1% 0%3.4%

/ 30. Our orientation program prepares new faculty, administration and staff to be effective. Your Overall (213) 3.3 12.7% 35.7% 30.5% 11.3% 9.9% Administration (33) 2.85 9.1% 21.2% 24.2% 36.4% 9.1% Faculty (60) 3.53 16.7% 40% 31.7% 3.3% 8.3% Adjunct Faculty (15) 3.93 33.3% 46.7% 6.7%6.7%6.7% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) 3.19 5.6% 36.1% 38.9% 11.1% 8.3% Non-exempt Staff (54) 3.26 13% 35.2% 29.6% 9.3% 13% 31. The facilities (e.g., classrooms, offices, laboratories) adequately meet my needs. Your Overall (200) 3.63 15.5% 45.5% 28.5% 7.5% 3% Administration (32) 3.91 25% 43.8% 28.1% 3.1%0% Faculty (64) 3.61 17.2% 40.6% 31.3% 7.8% 3.1% Adjunct Faculty (16) 3.31 6.3% 43.8% 37.5% 0% 12.5% Exempt Prof'l Staff (31) 3.52 9.7% 51.6% 22.6% 12.9% 3.2% Non-exempt Staff (44) 3.61 9.1% 52.3% 29.5% 9.1% 0%

/ 32. Our senior leadership has the knowledge, skills and experience necessary for institutional success. Your Overall (224) 3.94 29% 45.1% 18.3% 5.8%1.8% Administration (33) 3.94 36.4% 39.4% 9.1% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) 4.08 40.6% 37.5% 12.5% 7.8% 1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) 4.28 33.3% 61.1% 5.6%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.71 18.4% 44.7% 28.9% 5.3%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (55) 3.82 21.8% 43.6% 30.9% 1.8%1.8% 33. There is a good balance of teaching, service and research at this institution. Your Overall (198) 3.81 18.7% 54.5% 18.2% 6.6%2% Administration (32) 3.84 15.6% 59.4% 18.8% 6.3%0% Faculty (64) 3.81 28.1% 43.8% 14.1% 9.4% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.82 17.6% 52.9% 23.5% 5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (31) 3.71 9.7% 58.1% 25.8% 6.5%0% Non-exempt Staff (39) 4 17.9% 66.7% 12.8% 2.6%0%

/ 34. This institution's benefits meet my needs. Your Overall (217) 3.6 19.8% 41% 24.9% 7.8% 6.5% Administration (33) 3.91 27.3% 45.5% 21.2% 3%3% Faculty (64) 3.56 23.4% 32.8% 26.6% 10.9% 6.3% Adjunct Faculty (11) 3.64 18.2% 54.5% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.58 15.8% 42.1% 28.9% 10.5% 2.6% Non-exempt Staff (56) 3.48 16.1% 44.6% 21.4% 7.1% 10.7% 35. Our recognition and awards programs are meaningful to me. Your Overall (207) 3.32 16.4% 30.9% 29% 15.5% 8.2% Administration (31) 3.58 19.4% 41.9% 19.4% 16.1% 3.2% Faculty (62) 3.52 27.4% 27.4% 24.2% 11.3% 9.7% Adjunct Faculty (13) 3.23 15.4% 30.8% 23.1% 23.1% 7.7% Exempt Prof'l Staff (34) 2.97 5.9% 26.5% 38.2% 17.6% 11.8% Non-exempt Staff (52) 3.29 11.5% 34.6% 32.7% 13.5% 7.7%

/ 36. I am proud to be part of this institution. Your Overall (227) 4.37 52.9% 32.6% 13.2% 1.3%0% Administration (33) 4.55 66.7% 21.2% 12.1% 0%0% Faculty (64) 4.31 53.1% 28.1% 15.6% 3.1%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.37 47.4% 42.1% 10.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4.21 42.1% 39.5% 15.8% 2.6%0% Non-exempt Staff (57) 4.46 56.1% 33.3% 10.5% 0%0% 37. Senior leadership shows a genuine interest in the well-being of faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (225) 3.76 27.6% 39.1% 20.9% 6.2%6.2% Administration (33) 3.85 30.3% 39.4% 21.2% 3%6.1% Faculty (64) 4.02 45.3% 28.1% 14.1% 7.8% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.82 29.4% 29.4% 35.3% 5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.39 10.5% 50% 21.1% 5.3% 13.2% Non-exempt Staff (57) 3.61 19.3% 42.1% 26.3% 5.3% 7%

/ 38. The role of faculty in shared governance is clearly stated and publicized. Your Overall (175) 3.84 24.6% 42.9% 25.1% 6.9%0.6% Administration (30) 3.87 26.7% 43.3% 23.3% 3.3%3.3% Faculty (64) 4.08 35.9% 40.6% 18.8% 4.7%0% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.76 17.6% 52.9% 17.6% 11.8% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (24) 3.46 8.3% 37.5% 45.8% 8.3% 0% Non-exempt Staff (28) 3.57 14.3% 39.3% 35.7% 10.7% 0% 39. Faculty are appropriately involved in decisions related to the education program (e.g., curriculum development, evaluation). Your Overall (150) 4.08 33.3% 46% 16.7% 3.3%0.7% Administration (26) 4.15 38.5% 46.2% 7.7% 7.7% 0% Faculty (64) 4.19 42.2% 42.2% 9.4% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (17) 4.12 35.3% 41.2% 23.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (14) 3.64 14.3% 35.7% 50% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (20) 3.9 15% 60% 25% 0%0%

/ 40. Teaching is appropriately recognized in the evaluation and promotion process. Your Overall (140) 3.98 30% 44.3% 19.3% 6.4%0% Administration (23) 4.22 43.5% 39.1% 13% 4.3%0% Faculty (62) 3.94 35.5% 33.9% 19.4% 11.3% 0% Adjunct Faculty (15) 3.93 13.3% 66.7% 20% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (12) 3.83 25% 33.3% 41.7% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (18) 3.94 16.7% 66.7% 11.1% 5.6%0% 41. Senior leadership communicates openly about important matters. Your Overall (221) 3.55 20.8% 32.6% 33% 8.1% 5.4% Administration (33) 3.55 21.2% 30.3% 33.3% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) 3.8 29.7% 34.4% 25% 7.8% 3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.65 23.5% 35.3% 29.4% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) 3.32 13.5% 32.4% 35.1% 10.8% 8.1% Non-exempt Staff (56) 3.45 16.1% 30.4% 41.1% 7.1%5.4%

/ 42. Faculty, administration and staff are meaningfully involved in institutional planning. Your Overall (215) 3.44 16.3% 34% 34% 8.8% 7% Administration (32) 3.56 21.9% 31.3% 34.4% 6.3%6.3% Faculty (64) 3.72 21.9% 43.8% 23.4% 6.3%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (16) 3.69 25% 31.3% 37.5% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) 3.19 8.1% 32.4% 37.8% 13.5% 8.1% Non-exempt Staff (52) 3.17 11.5% 26.9% 38.5% 13.5% 9.6% 43. At this institution, we discuss and debate issues respectfully to get better results. Your Overall (214) 3.5 19.6% 31.8% 32.7% 11.2% 4.7% Administration (33) 3.64 24.2% 30.3% 33.3% 9.1% 3% Faculty (64) 3.84 34.4% 31.3% 23.4% 6.3%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (15) 3.87 20% 60% 13.3% 0%6.7% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) 3.27 8.1% 35.1% 35.1% 18.9% 2.7% Non-exempt Staff (51) 3.14 9.8% 21.6% 47.1% 15.7% 5.9%

/ 44. This institution's policies and practices ensure fair treatment for faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (224) 3.65 19.6% 42.4% 24.1% 11.2% 2.7% Administration (33) 3.67 21.2% 42.4% 21.2% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) 3.89 28.1% 43.8% 18.8% 7.8% 1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) 3.78 27.8% 33.3% 33.3% 0%5.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.34 10.5% 42.1% 26.3% 13.2% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (57) 3.6 14% 43.9% 29.8% 12.3% 0% 45. At this institution, people are supportive of their colleagues regardless of their heritage or background. Your Overall (225) 4.16 33.8% 52% 11.6% 1.8%0.9% Administration (33) 4.36 42.4% 51.5% 6.1%0%0% Faculty (64) 4.25 51.6% 31.3% 10.9% 3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) 3.95 26.3% 42.1% 31.6% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) 4.16 24.3% 67.6% 8.1% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) 4.03 20.7% 63.8% 13.8% 1.7%0%

/ 46. Faculty, administration and staff work together to ensure the success of institution programs and initiatives. Your Overall (221) 3.8 22.6% 42.5% 29% 4.1%1.8% Administration (33) 3.91 24.2% 45.5% 27.3% 3%0% Faculty (64) 4.03 34.4% 40.6% 21.9% 0%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.76 23.5% 29.4% 47.1% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) 3.62 16.2% 43.2% 29.7% 8.1% 2.7% Non-exempt Staff (56) 3.59 14.3% 41.1% 35.7% 7.1%1.8% 47. My supervisor/department chair supports my efforts to balance my work and personal life. Your Overall (224) 4.3 50% 37.9% 7.1%2.2%2.7% Administration (33) 4.33 51.5% 39.4% 3%3%3% Faculty (64) 4.45 62.5% 28.1% 4.7%1.6%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) 4.35 47.1% 41.2% 11.8% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4.34 47.4% 44.7% 5.3%0%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) 4.12 39.7% 41.4% 12.1% 5.2%1.7%

/ 48. Senior leadership regularly models this institution's values. Your Overall (223) 3.87 27.8% 40.8% 24.7% 4%2.7% Administration (33) 3.88 30.3% 39.4% 24.2% 0%6.1% Faculty (64) 4.05 42.2% 31.3% 18.8% 4.7%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (18) 4 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.68 18.4% 47.4% 23.7% 5.3%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (56) 3.75 16.1% 48.2% 30.4% 5.4%0% 49. This institution actively contributes to the community. Your Overall (225) 4.2 39.1% 44.9% 13.3% 2.7%0% Administration (33) 4.36 48.5% 39.4% 12.1% 0%0% Faculty (64) 4.38 51.6% 37.5% 7.8% 3.1%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.16 36.8% 47.4% 10.5% 5.3%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) 4.08 24.3% 59.5% 16.2% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) 4.07 31% 48.3% 17.2% 3.4%0%

/ 50. This institution places sufficient emphasis on having diverse faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (220) 4.03 28.2% 51.4% 15.9% 4.1%0.5% Administration (33) 4 24.2% 54.5% 18.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) 4.08 35.9% 45.3% 10.9% 6.3%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.88 35.3% 23.5% 35.3% 5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) 3.92 16.7% 58.3% 25% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (56) 4.09 28.6% 55.4% 12.5% 3.6%0% 51. There is appropriate recognition of innovative and high quality teaching. Your Overall (163) 3.79 19% 52.8% 20.2% 4.3%3.7% Administration (28) 4.11 25% 64.3% 7.1%3.6%0% Faculty (63) 3.78 27% 39.7% 22.2% 6.3%4.8% Adjunct Faculty (16) 3.5 12.5% 37.5% 37.5% 12.5% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (19) 3.74 10.5% 63.2% 21.1% 0%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (27) 3.78 11.1% 63% 22.2% 0%3.7%

/ 52. We celebrate significant milestones and important accomplishments at this institution. Your Overall (220) 3.99 26.4% 52.7% 15.5% 4.1%1.4% Administration (33) 4.12 36.4% 42.4% 18.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) 4.08 32.8% 51.6% 9.4% 3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.76 23.5% 41.2% 23.5% 11.8% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) 3.92 16.2% 64.9% 13.5% 5.4%0% Non-exempt Staff (55) 4.02 23.6% 56.4% 18.2% 1.8%0% 53. This institution's policies and practices give me the flexibility to manage my work and personal life. Your Overall (224) 4.2 38.4% 46.4% 12.9% 1.3%0.9% Administration (33) 4.09 27.3% 54.5% 18.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) 4.25 46.9% 40.6% 6.3%3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) 4.29 35.3% 58.8% 5.9%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4.29 39.5% 50% 10.5% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) 4.14 36.2% 43.1% 19% 1.7%0%

/ 54. This institution has clear and effective procedures for dealing with discrimination. Your Overall (217) 4.09 26.7% 59.4% 11.1% 1.4%1.4% Administration (33) 4.09 24.2% 60.6% 15.2% 0%0% Faculty (59) 4.14 35.6% 50.8% 8.5% 1.7%3.4% Adjunct Faculty (17) 4.18 29.4% 64.7% 0%5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4.05 21.1% 68.4% 7.9% 0%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (56) 4 21.4% 58.9% 17.9% 1.8%0% 55. There is regular and open communication among faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (220) 3.52 20.9% 28.2% 36.4% 10.9% 3.6% Administration (33) 3.67 24.2% 27.3% 39.4% 9.1% 0% Faculty (64) 3.91 35.9% 31.3% 21.9% 9.4% 1.6% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.47 17.6% 29.4% 41.2% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) 3.17 13.9% 22.2% 36.1% 22.2% 5.6% Non-exempt Staff (56) 3.27 8.9% 26.8% 51.8% 7.1%5.4%

/ 56. I believe what I am told by senior leadership. Your Overall (225) 3.74 26.2% 40.4% 21.3% 5.3%6.7% Administration (33) 3.7 27.3% 33.3% 30.3% 0% 9.1% Faculty (64) 3.89 35.9% 34.4% 18.8% 4.7%6.3% Adjunct Faculty (18) 4.11 38.9% 44.4% 11.1% 0%5.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.47 13.2% 50% 15.8% 13.2% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.69 22.4% 43.1% 22.4% 5.2%6.9% 57. This institution is well run. Your Overall (226) 3.77 23% 41.2% 27.4% 6.6%1.8% Administration (33) 3.79 24.2% 42.4% 24.2% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) 3.92 39.1% 26.6% 25% 6.3%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) 3.95 21.1% 57.9% 15.8% 5.3%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.55 10.5% 42.1% 39.5% 7.9% 0% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.67 15.5% 48.3% 25.9% 8.6% 1.7%

/ 58. There's a sense that we're all on the same team at this institution. Your Overall (224) 3.44 20.5% 29% 31.3% 12.1% 7.1% Administration (33) 3.48 21.2% 24.2% 39.4% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) 3.75 35.9% 25% 21.9% 12.5% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.59 17.6% 41.2% 29.4% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.08 10.5% 28.9% 31.6% 15.8% 13.2% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.22 12.1% 31% 34.5% 12.1% 10.3% 59. This institution's culture is special - something you don't find just anywhere. Your Overall (225) 3.96 29.8% 45.3% 17.3% 5.8%1.8% Administration (33) 4.18 39.4% 45.5% 12.1% 0%3% Faculty (64) 4.16 43.8% 34.4% 17.2% 3.1%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) 4 33.3% 38.9% 22.2% 5.6%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 3.68 13.2% 57.9% 15.8% 10.5% 2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) 3.83 20.7% 51.7% 19% 6.9%1.7%

/ 60. All things considered, this is a great place to work. Your Overall (226) 4.23 44.2% 38.5% 13.7% 3.1%0.4% Administration (33) 4.27 48.5% 33.3% 15.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) 4.23 54.7% 21.9% 17.2% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) 4.11 36.8% 36.8% 26.3% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) 4.24 36.8% 52.6% 7.9% 2.6%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) 4.26 39.7% 48.3% 10.3% 1.7%0% 61. As a faculty member, I believe the College adequately supports scholarship. Your Overall (101) 3.9 31.7% 39.6% 18.8% 6.9%3% Administration (14) 3.64 7.1% 64.3% 14.3% 14.3% 0% Faculty (64) 3.89 34.4% 34.4% 21.9% 4.7%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (15) 4.07 33.3% 46.7% 13.3% 6.7%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (1) 5 100% 0%0%0%0% Non-exempt Staff (4) 4.25 50% 25% 25% 0%0%

/ 62. As a faculty member, I believe faculty who stay at UVA-Wise are better off than those who leave. Your Overall (100) 3.42 20% 26% 35% 14% 5% Administration (14) 3.14 7.1% 42.9% 21.4% 14.3% 14.3% Faculty (62) 3.39 19.4% 24.2% 35.5% 17.7% 3.2% Adjunct Faculty (16) 3.63 25% 25% 43.8% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (1) 3 0%0% 100% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (4) 4 50% 25% 0% 25% 0% 63. As a faculty member, I believe the tenure and promotion process is comprehensible. Your Overall (85) 3.72 23.5% 41.2% 23.5% 7.1%4.7% Administration (11) 3.82 9.1% 63.6% 27.3% 0%0% Faculty (58) 3.72 29.3% 32.8% 24.1% 8.6% 5.2% Adjunct Faculty (10) 3.7 10% 60% 20% 10% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff - - Non-exempt Staff (4) 3.5 25% 50% 0%0% 25%

/ 64. As a faculty member, I believe the tenure and promotion process is equitable. Your Overall (86) 3.62 17.4% 44.2% 26.7% 5.8%5.8% Administration (11) 3.64 9.1% 54.5% 27.3% 9.1% 0% Faculty (58) 3.62 20.7% 43.1% 22.4% 5.2% 8.6% Adjunct Faculty (11) 3.55 9.1% 36.4% 54.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff - - Non-exempt Staff (4) 3.75 25% 50% 0% 25% 0% 65. I believe a culture of open discussion and debate exists at the College. Your Overall (202) 3.67 18.3% 41.6% 31.2% 6.9%2% Administration (30) 3.87 23.3% 50% 16.7% 10% 0% Faculty (64) 3.84 29.7% 40.6% 18.8% 6.3%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (16) 3.69 25% 31.3% 37.5% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (34) 3.47 5.9% 44.1% 41.2% 8.8% 0% Non-exempt Staff (46) 3.46 8.7% 34.8% 50% 6.5%0%

/ 66. I believe decisions affecting the College are arrived at in an open manner and understood by the college community. Your Overall (212) 3.39 14.2% 34% 34.9% 10.4% 6.6% Administration (30) 3.63 16.7% 43.3% 26.7% 13.3% 0% Faculty (64) 3.48 23.4% 32.8% 23.4% 9.4% 10.9% Adjunct Faculty (17) 3.59 17.6% 35.3% 41.2% 0%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) 3.05 5.4% 21.6% 54.1% 10.8% 8.1% Non-exempt Staff (51) 3.27 7.8% 35.3% 39.2% 11.8% 5.9%