Performance Dashboard

Similar documents
Performance Dashboard

Unified Corridor Investment Study Performance Dashboard

Attachment B: GM Memo a

FACT SHEETS LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP

AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE

Integrated Transportation Plan. TAC Meeting September 16, 2014

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

The Role of Transportation Systems Management & Operations in Supporting Livability and Sustainability

Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT February 15, 2017 Page 2 of 3 Background MTC is expected to seek authorization from the State Legis

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

This page intentionally left blank.

Congestion Management Process 2013 Update

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

FACT SHEETS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1

Section 11: Transportation Strategies Toolbox

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM

Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan Update Evaluation Outcomes

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

What is the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP)?

TSM/TDM (Transit and Roadway Efficiency) Concept - Analysis and Results

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

Dear Board of County Commissioners, Mayor Flitner, and Town Councilors,

Strategic Plan. SFMTA Board of Directors Workshop

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

The Level of Service Metric and. Alternatives for Multi-Modal Transportation. in Oakland

APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017

Transit Investment Direction and Plan Introduction. Transportation Advisory Board TPP Workshop August 16, 2017

SCS Scenario Planning

MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Management. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

9.0 Meeting the Challenges

Fresno Council of Governments. Sustainable Communities Strategy Scenarios

Appendix O Level of Service Standard and Measurements

SBCAG is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) of the nine county jurisdictions, which provides a forum for solving regional problems

Benefit-Cost Analysis Documentation

Alternatives Identification and Evaluation

09Scenario Evaluation

VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) TRAFFIC IMPACT METRIC

7.0 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

1003 K Street NW, Suite 209 Washington, DC MEMORANDUM. Matthew Ridgway, Nat Bottigheimer, and Alex Rixey, Fehr & Peers

2016 RTP/SCS Performance Measures Update Technical Working Group

I-290 Eisenhower Expressway

Benefit Cost Analysis Narrative

6 CHARTING PERFORMANCE

Sustainable Transportation & Land Use Integration Study

Critical Issues for Transportation Policy And Finance The Second William O. Lipinski Symposium on Transportation Policy

Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

Moving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan

APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY FEBRUARY 2017

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Category 3, BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements. Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 5 The Authority directed staf

Future Build Alternative Traffic Forecasts and Level of Service Analysis

Executive Summary. What is the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada?

Public Input from Regional Visioning Forums

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

ITEM 11 - Information January 21, Briefing on Project Submissions for the 2015 CLRP

Database and Travel Demand Model

CHAPTER 8. Congestion Management

Long-Range Plan Task Force: Draft Analysis Results

New Climate for Transportation. How the City of San Diego and SANDAG must improve transportation to meet climate goals.

10.0 Congestion Management Process

TCATS October 12-Michigan Works 5:30-7pm. NATS October 19-Niles District Library 6-7:30pm

Congestion Management Process 2013 Update

REGIONAL VISION REGIONAL GOALS

Guidance for Responding to the Transportation 2040 Prioritization Measures

Comparison of I-210 and I-710 as Potential ICM Corridors

VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Alternatives Analysis

December 19, 2014 VIA E- MAIL. Re: Recommendations for the 2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan (ITSP) Update

Appendix F 2008 Travel Demand Modeling

09Scenario. Evaluation. CHAPTER 9: Scenario Evaluation 85. Modesto Junior College, Modesto, CA

WELCOME. Schedule. Contact Information. Please Provide Written Comments

Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study

CHAPTER 6 TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND POLICIES

CHAPTER 8 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

CHARTING PROGRESS TO 2040 RESULTS OF MINI-SURVEYS

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

City of Berkeley. Guidelines for Development of Traffic Impact Reports

Des Moines Area MPO. MPO Planning Subcommittee Meeting March 3, Des M oines Area M etropolitan Planning Organization

I-81 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Transportation A Conversation on Regional Transportation. Tacoma City Manager April 15, Update to the Regional Transportation Plan

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

Progress Report Regional Express & Bus Rapid Transit Program

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

Transcription:

Unified Corridor Investment Study Performance Dashboard Step 2 Analysis Results DRAFT Revised 10/15/18 October 2018

Project Description Three parallel routes - Highway 1, Soquel/Freedom and the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line - link the communities along the Santa Cruz County coast from Davenport through Watsonville. The Unified Corridor Study examines how well complimentary transportation improvements on all three routes - when designed to function together as a single unified corridor perform to meet the community s transportation needs. The Unified Corridor Study performance dashboard presents the result of the second, in a two step analysis, which compares how each of the scenarios address the study goals of Safety, Efficiency, Economics, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Equity by 2035. The evaluation of 16 performance measures for each of the scenarios and a comparison to a no build and baseline conditions is designed to increase understanding of transportation project benefits by transparently evaluating their impacts and lead to effective investments in the corridor.

Step 2 Scenarios for Analysis Approved by RTC on December 7, 2017 Scenario Highway 1 Projects A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E No Build Buses on shoulders High occupancy vehicle lanes (HOV) and increased transit frequency Auxiliary lanes to extend merging distance IN ADDITION TO MEASURE D Metering of on-ramps Additional lanes on bridge over San Lorenzo River Mission St intersection improvements Soquel Avenue/Drive and Freedom Blvd BRT lite (faster boarding, transit signal priority and queue jumps) Increased frequency of transit with express services Buffered/protected bike lanes Intersection improvements for auto Intersection improvements for bikes/pedestrians Rail Corridor Bike and pedestrian trail Local rail transit with interregional connections Bus rapid transit Freight service on rail Overall Project Area/Connections between Routes Improved bike/pedestrian facilities throughout urban area closing gaps in network Additional transit connections Bike share, bike amenities, transit amenities, park and ride lots Multimodal transportation hubs Automated vehicles/connected vehicles Transportation Demand and System Management Employers and residences - incentive programs Education and enforcement - electric vehicle, motorist safety, and bike safety Only Watsonville These projects will be evaluated in all scenarios. These projects will be evaluated in all scenarios.

This page left intentionally blank.

Scenario A Step 2 Performance Measures PM: Total Collisions (Fatal, Injury, and Property Damage Only per year) Scenario A, 979 Revised 10/15/18, 1211 Baseline, 1110 Highway 1 Projects HOV and auxiliary lanes, ramp meters, San Lorenzo bridge widening, multimodal intersection improvements Soquel / Freedom BRT Lite with increased transit frequency, multimodal intersection improvements Rail ROW Bike and pedestrian trail Goal 1 Safer transportation for all modes. PM: Countywide Mean Auto Speed (mph) 40.5 40.6 34.4 34.7 39.4 32.8 Scenario A Scenario A Walk 10.9% Bike 4.3% Transit 4.1% Drive Alone 42.8% AM Peak Period 6:00-9:00 AM Baseline PM Peak Period 4:00-7:00 PM PM: Mode Share Goal 2 Reliable and efficient transportation choices that serve the most people and facilitate the transport of goods. Carpool 37.8%

PM: Person trips across N-S Screenline 4:00-6:00 PM (In thousands) Scenario A 33 37 22 31 31 18 Baseline 28 27 16 Seabright Avenue 41st Ave San Andreas/Freedom Goal 3 Develop a well-integrated transportation system that supports economic vitality. PM: Level Of Public Investment (In millions) Annual Cost for O&M $25 Revised 10/12/18 $9 $16 New Public Investment Needed Funding Potential $520 $379 Capital Costs $899 PM: Visitor Tax Revenues (per year in millions) Scenario A Scenario A Total Transient Occupancy Tax Visitor Related Sales Tax $40.1 $39.0 $28.6 $28.0 $27.2 $18.3 $10.3 $12.0 $11.8 Baseline Scenario A

PM: Cost Associated with Collisions (per year) Revised 10/15/18 Cost per $224 K Collision x 1,211 Collisions = $271 M Collision Cost Cost per $224 K Collision x Scenario A 979 Collisions = Scenario A $219 M Collision Cost Cost -$52 M Savings PM: Automobile Vehicle Miles Traveled (Countywide VMT per day in millions) Scenario A 2035 2015 Baseline 5.48 5.98 6.13 Goal 4 Minimize environmental concerns and reduce adverse health impacts. PM: Total Criteria Pollutants (metric tons per day) 26.98 6.21 6.27 Baseline Scenario A CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 ROG NOX

PM: Greenhouse Gas Emissions CO 2 e Emissions (metric tons per day) and Percentage Reduction from 2015 Baseline CO 2 e 2,617-27% -26% 1,915 1,941 Baseline Scenario A PM: Environmentally Sensitive Areas (# linear miles along 3 routes) 36.5 2 nd lowest score Goal 5 Accessible and equitable transportation system that is responsive to the needs of all users. PM: Transit Vehicle Miles Traveled (per year in millions) Scenario A 2035 2015 Baseline 3.61 3.33 5.74

PM: Household Transportation Cost Percentage of Income Spent on Transportation (by median income households per year) 18% Baseline 16% 26% Baseline 24% 17% 25% Daily Costs for 2-Vehicle Households Scenario A $48.64 2015 Baseline $46.63 $2.01 2035 $50.14 $1.50 1 Vehicle Household 2 Vehicle Household PM: Share of Investment Benefit for Transportation Disadvantaged Population 24.0% 14% of population is transportation disadvantaged Scenario A

This page left intentionally blank.

Scenario B Step 2 Performance Measures PM: Total Collisions (Fatal, Injury, and Property Damage Only per year) Scenario B, 865 Revised 10/15/18, 1211 Baseline, 1110 Highway 1 Projects Bus on shoulder, ramp metering, Mission St. intersection improvements Soquel / Freedom BRT Lite with increased transit frequency, buffered/protected bike lanes, bike/ped intersection improvements Rail ROW Bike and pedestrian trail, rail transit Goal 1 Safer transportation for all modes. PM: Countywide Mean Auto Speed (mph) 40.5 34.4 39.4 39.4 32.9 32.8 Scenario B Scenario B Bike 4.4% Walk 10.7% Drive Alone 42.4% AM Peak Period 6:00-9:00 AM Baseline PM Peak Period 4:00-7:00 PM Transit 6.0% Carpool 36.5% PM: Mode Share Goal 2 Reliable and efficient transportation choices that serve the most people and facilitate the transport of goods.

PM: Person trips across N-S Screenline 4:00-6:00 PM (In thousands) Scenario B 32 33 19 31 31 18 Baseline 28 27 16 Seabright Avenue 41st Ave San Andreas/Freedom PM: Level Of Public Investment (In millions) Revised 10/12/18 Goal 3 Develop a well-integrated transportation system that supports economic vitality. Annual Cost for O&M $47 $16 $31 New Public Investment Needed Funding Potential $379 $455 Capital Costs $833 PM: Visitor Tax Revenues (per year in millions) Scenario B Scenario B Total Transient Occupancy Tax Visitor Related Sales Tax $40.2 $39.0 $28.6 $28.1 $27.2 $18.3 $10.3 $12.1 $11.8 Baseline Scenario B

PM: Cost Associated with Collisions (per year) Revised 10/15/18 Cost per $224 K Collision x 1,211 Collisions = $271 M Collision Cost Cost per $224 K Collision x Scenario B 865 Collisions = Scenario B $192 M Collision Cost Cost -$78 M Savings Goal 4 Minimize environmental concerns and reduce adverse health impacts. PM: Automobile Vehicle Miles Traveled (Countywide VMT per day in millions) Scenario B 2035 2015 Baseline 5.48 5.90 5.98 PM: Total Criteria Pollutants (metric tons per day) 26.98 6.21 6.11 Baseline Scenario B CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 ROG NOX

PM: Greenhouse Gas Emissions CO 2 e Emissions (metric tons per day) and Percentage Reduction from 2015 Baseline CO 2 e 2,617-27% -28% 1,915 1,886 Baseline Scenario B PM: Environmentally Sensitive Areas (# linear miles along 3 routes) 38.3 2 nd highest score Goal 5 Accessible and equitable transportation system that is responsive to the needs of all users. PM: Transit Vehicle Miles Traveled (per year in millions) Scenario B 2035 2015 Baseline 3.61 3.33 6.65

PM: Household Transportation Cost Percentage of Income Spent on Transportation (by median income households per year) 18% Baseline 16% 26% Baseline 24% 17% 25% Daily Costs for 2-Vehicle Households Scenario B $48.48 2015 Baseline $46.63 $1.85 2035 $50.14 $1.66 1 Vehicle Household 2 Vehicle Household PM: Share of Investment Benefit for Transportation Disadvantaged Population 25.2% 14% of population is transportation disadvantaged Scenario B

This page left intentionally blank.

Scenario C Step 2 Performance Measures PM: Total Collisions (Fatal, Injury, and Property Damage Only per year) Scenario C, 970 Revised 10/15/18, 1211 Baseline, 1110 Highway 1 Projects Bus on shoulders, auxiliary lanes Soquel / Freedom BRT Lite with increased transit frequency, multimodal intersection improvements Rail ROW Bike and pedestrian trail, bus rapid transit, freight service (in Watsonville) Goal 1 Safer transportation for all modes. PM: Countywide Mean Auto Speed (mph) 40.5 34.4 39.4 39.4 32.8 32.8 Scenario C Scenario C Bike 4.2% Walk 10.8% Drive Alone 43.1% AM Peak Period 6:00-9:00 AM Baseline PM Peak Period 4:00-7:00 PM Transit 4.8% Carpool 37.1% PM: Mode Share Goal 2 Reliable and efficient transportation choices that serve the most people and facilitate the transport of goods.

PM: Person trips across N-S Screenline 4:00-6:00 PM (In thousands) Scenario C 32 32 19 31 31 18 Baseline 28 27 16 Seabright Avenue 41st Ave San Andreas/Freedom PM: Level Of Public Investment (In millions) Revised 10/12/18 Goal 3 Develop a well-integrated $11 transportation Annual system that Cost for O&M supports economic $30 vitality. $19 New Public Investment Needed Funding Potential $285 $455 Capital Costs $740 PM: Visitor Tax Revenues (per year in millions) Total Transient Occupancy Tax Visitor Related Sales Tax $39.7 $39.0 Scenario C Scenario C $28.6 $27.8 $27.2 $18.3 $10.3 $11.9 $11.8 Baseline Scenario C

PM: Cost Associated with Collisions (per year) Revised 10/15/18 Cost per $224 K Collision x 1,211 Collisions = $271 M Collision Cost Cost per $224 K Collision x Scenario C 970 Collisions = Scenario C $217 M Collision Cost Cost -$54 M Savings Goal 4 Minimize environmental concerns and reduce adverse health impacts. PM: Automobile Vehicle Miles Traveled (Countywide VMT per day in millions) Scenario C 2035 2015 Baseline 5.48 5.92 5.98 PM: Total Criteria Pollutants (metric tons per day) 26.98 6.21 6.15 Baseline Scenario C CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 ROG NOX

PM: Greenhouse Gas Emissions CO 2 e Emissions (metric tons per day) and Percentage Reduction from 2015 Baseline CO 2 e 2,617-27% -27% 1,915 1,899 Baseline Scenario C PM: Environmentally Sensitive Areas (# linear miles along 3 routes) 36.0 Lowest score Goal 5 Accessible and equitable transportation system that is responsive to the needs of all users. PM: Transit Vehicle Miles Traveled (per year in millions) Scenario C 2035 2015 Baseline 3.61 3.33 6.11

PM: Household Transportation Cost Percentage of Income Spent on Transportation (by median income households per year) 18% Baseline 16% 26% Baseline 24% 17% 25% Daily Costs for 2-Vehicle Households Scenario C $48.90 2015 Baseline $46.63 $2.27 2035 $50.14 $1.25 1 Vehicle Household 2 Vehicle Household PM: Share of Investment Benefit for Transportation Disadvantaged Population 25.2% 14% of population is transportation disadvantaged Scenario C

This page left intentionally blank.

Scenario E Step 2 Performance Measures PM: Total Collisions (Fatal, Injury, and Property Damage Only per year) Scenario E, 968 Revised 10/15/18, 1211 Highway 1 Projects HOV and auxiliary lanes, ramp meters Soquel / Freedom Buffered/protected bike lanes, bike/pedestrian intersection improvements Rail ROW Bike and pedestrian trail, rail transit, freight service Baseline, 1110 Goal 1 Safer transportation for all modes. PM: Countywide Mean Auto Speed (mph) 40.5 40.6 34.4 34.8 39.4 32.8 AM Peak Period 6:00-9:00 AM PM Peak Period 4:00-7:00 PM Transit 5.3% Bike 4.4% Carpool 37.3% Walk 10.7% PM: Mode Share Drive Alone 42.3% Baseline Goal 2 Reliable and efficient transportation choices that serve the most people and facilitate the transport of goods.

PM: Person trips across N-S Screenline 4:00-6:00 PM (In thousands) Scenario E 34 38 22 31 31 18 Baseline 28 27 16 Seabright Avenue 41st Ave San Andreas/Freedom Goal 3 Develop a well-integrated $6 transportation system that Annual Cost for supports economic O&M vitality. $39 $33 PM: Level Of Public Investment (In thousands) Revised 10/12/18 New Public Investment Needed Funding Potential $794 $453 Capital Costs $1,247 Scenario E Scenario E PM: Visitor Tax Revenues (per year in millions) Total Transient Occupancy Tax Visitor Related Sales Tax $40.1 $39.0 $28.6 $28.1 $27.2 $18.3 $10.3 $12.0 $11.8 Baseline Scenario E

PM: Cost Associated with Collisions (per year) Revised 10/15/18 Cost per $224 K Collision x 1,211 Collisions = $271 M Collision Cost Cost per $224 K Collision x Scenario E 968 Collisions = Scenario E $217 M Collision Cost Cost -$54 M Savings Goal 4 Minimize environmental concerns and reduce adverse health impacts. PM: Automobile Vehicle Miles Traveled (Countywide VMT per day in millions) Scenario E 2035 2015 Baseline 5.48 5.98 6.10 PM: Total Criteria Pollutants (metric tons per day) 26.98 6.21 6.23 Baseline Scenario E CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 ROG NOX

PM: Greenhouse Gas Emissions CO 2 e Emissions (metric tons per day) and Percentage Reduction from 2015 Baseline CO 2 e 2,617-27% -26% 1,915 1,928 Baseline Scenario E PM: Environmentally Sensitive Areas (# linear miles along 3 routes) 40.7 Highest score Goal 5 Accessible and equitable transportation system that is responsive to the needs of all users. PM: Transit Vehicle Miles Traveled (per year in millions) Scenario E 2035 2015 Baseline 3.33 3.61 5.23

PM: Household Transportation Cost Percentage of Income Spent on Transportation (by median income households per year) 18% Baseline 16% 26% Baseline 24% 17% 25% Daily Costs for 2-Vehicle Households Scenario E $48.52 2015 Baseline $46.63 $1.89 2035 $50.14 $1.62 1 Vehicle Household 2 Vehicle Household PM: Share of Investment Benefit for Transportation Disadvantaged Population 23.5% 14% of population is transportation disadvantaged Scenario E

This page left intentionally blank.

All Scenarios Comparison GOAL 1 Safer transportation for all modes. Total Annual Collisions Fatal, Injury, and Property Damage Only Scenario A, 1211 Scenario A, 979 Baseline, 1110 Scenario B, 1211 Scenario B, 865 Baseline, 1110 Scenario C, 1211 Scenario C, 970 Baseline, 1110 Scenario E, 1211 Scenario E, 968 Baseline, 1110 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Revised 10/15/18 GOAL 2 Reliable and efficient transportation choices that serve the most people and facilitate the transport of goods. 40.6 Countywide Mean Auto Speed (MPH) AM Peak Period (6:00-9:00 AM) 40.5 40.5 40.5 40.5 39.4 39.4 40.6 39.4 39.4 39.4 39.4 Countywide Mean Auto Speed (MPH) PM Peak Period (4:00-7:00 PM) 34.7 34.8 34.4 34.4 34.4 34.4 32.9 32.8 32.8 32.8 32.8 32.8 Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E Baseline Baseline

GOAL 2 Reliability and Efficiency (continued) Scenario A Mode Share Scenario B Mode Share Drive Alone 42.8% Drive Alone 42.4% Carpool 37.8% Carpool 36.5% Walk 10.9% Walk 10.7% Bike 4.3% Bike 4.4% Transit 4.1% Transit 6.0% Scenario C Mode Share Scenario E Mode Share Drive Alone 43.1% Drive Alone 42.3% Carpool 37.1% Carpool 37.3% Walk 10.8% Walk 10.7% Bike 4.2% Bike 4.4% Transit 4.8% Transit 5.3% 2015 Baseline 2035 Person Trips (4-6pm) Screenline # 4 at 41st Ave 2035 Person Trips (4-6pm) Screenline # 9 at San Andreas/Freedom Baseline 27 Baseline 16 31 18 Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E 33 32 37 38 Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E 19 19 22 22 In thousands In thousands

GOAL 3 Develop a well-integrated transportation system that supports economic vitality. Level of Public Investment Capital Costs and Funding Potential Estimates (In millions) $794 New Public Investments Needed $520 $379 $285 Capital Cost $1,246 Funding Potential $899 $832 $740 $379 $455 $455 $453 Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E Annual Cost for Operations & Maintenance (In millions) $16 $6 New Public Investment Needed $9 $25 $47 $11 $30 $39 O& M Cost Funding Potential $16 $31 $19 $33 Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E Revised 10/12/18

GOAL 3 Economic Vitality (continued) Total Transient Occupancy Tax Visitor Related Sales Tax Visitor Tax Revenues (per year in millions) $40.1 $40.2 $39.7 $40.1 $39.0 $28.6 $28.0 $28.0 $27.8 $28.1 $27.2 $18.3 $10.3 $12.0 $12.1 $11.9 $12.0 $11.8 Baseline Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E Cost Associated with Collisions (in millions/year) Scenario A $219 $52 Scenario B $193 $78 Scenario C $217 $54 Scenario E $217 $54 Collision Cost Savings $271 M Revised 10/15/18

GOAL 4 Minimize environmental concerns and reduce adverse health impacts. 6.13 Countywide Vehicle Miles Traveled Miles (per day in millions) 5.90 5.92 6.10 Baseline Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E Environmentally Sensitive Areas Scenario A (mi) 36.5 Scenario B (mi) 38.3 Scenario C (mi) 36.0 Scenario E (mi) 40.7 26.98 Total Criteria Pollutants (metric tons per day) 6.21 6.27 6.11 6.15 6.23 Baseline Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 ROG NOX

GOAL 4 Environment (continued) CO 2 e Emissions (metric tons/day) and % Reduction from 2015 Baseline 2,617-27% -26% -28% -27% -26% CO 2 e (mtpd) 1,915 1,941 1,886 1,899 1,928 Baseline Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E GOAL 5 Accessible and equitable transportation system that is responsive to the needs of all users. Annual Transit Vehicle Miles Traveled (in millions) Scenario A 5.74 Scenario B 6.65 Scenario C 6.11 Scenario E 5.23 2035 3.61 2015 Baseline 3.33

GOAL 5 Equity (continued) Household Transportation Cost (% of Median Income) 26% 18% Baseline 24% 17% Baseline 16% 25% 1 Vehicle Household 2 Vehicle Household Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E Share of Investment Benefit for Transportation Disadvantaged Population 24.0% 25.2% 25.2% 23.5% 13.7% of population is transportation disadvantaged Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E