IACHR methodology for reviewing regulatory provisions, policies, and practices in order to strengthen the inter-american human rights system

Similar documents
Inter-American Commission On Human Rights. Strategic Plan Executive Summary. Organization of American States [ A ]

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 9 April [without reference to a Main Committee (A/68/L.37)]

AG/RES (XXXIX-O/09) ACCESS TO PUBLIC INFORMATION: STRENGTHENING DEMOCRACY 1/ (Adopted at the fourth plenary session, held on June 4, 2009)

\Pi /;,~. 10 February, Excellency,

ANNEX G THE SECRETARIAT FOR LEGAL AFFAIRS I. MISSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly

Future programme, organization and methods of work of the Commission on Sustainable Development

Copenhagen Declaration

ANNOTATED PROVISIONAL AGENDA

Guidelines against Intimidation or Reprisals ( San José Guidelines )*

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Executive Board

FOREST EUROPE Structures, Procedures and Work Modalities

Major Groups and Other Stakeholders High Level Political Forum Coordination Mechanism Terms of Reference

51/177. Implementation of the outcome of the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II)

DECISION No. 476 MODALITIES FOR OSCE MEETINGS ON HUMAN DIMENSION ISSUES

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/61/L.24)]

A GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE

United Nations: The relationship between Member States and civil society, including non-governmental organizations

INTERNATIONAL FORUM: LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN (LAC) IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/61/L.56 and Add.1)] 61/266. Multilingualism

CHAPTER. A. Odero and C. Phouangsavath

Economic and Social Council

Hosted health partnerships

Statement By H.E Mr. Eshag Alehabib Ambassador and Deputy Permanent Representative Islamic Republic of Iran

INTER-AMERICAN PROGRAM ON EDUCATION FOR DEMOCRATIC VALUES AND PRACTICES. (Adopted at the fourth plenary session, held on June 7, 2011)

DECLARATION ON THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT

General Assembly review of 68/1 Co-Facilitators' zero draft resolution

A/HRC/25/NGO/176. General Assembly. United Nations

SUMMIT IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW GROUP (SIRG) April 28, May 2017

Economic and Social Council

Decision IG.21/13. Governance

Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland: revised draft resolution

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/65/L.79 and Add.1)]

Scope, modalities, format and organization of the high-level meeting on universal health coverage

Issues to be addressed in the thematic chapter of the 2019 and 2020 reports of the Inter-agency Task Force

SPEAKING NOTES FOR MR. PATRIZIO CIVILI ASSISTANT SECRETARY-GENERAL FOR POLICY COORDINATION AND INTER-AGENCY AFFAIRS

Establishment of the Asian and Pacific Training Centre for Information and Communication Technology for Development

Improving governance: the OAS and the strengthening of local public management and citizen participation

United Nations system: private sector partnerships arrangements in the context of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

Framework for Collaboration between the President and the Executive Board of IFAD

One year of SDGs: Where the Latin America and Caribbean regions stands

Helsinki European Council (10-11 December 1999) Presidency Conclusions. Introduction

Economic and Social Council

(I) ~ 16 December Excellency,

Yearbook 2008/09 Human Rights: Brazil at the UN

ANNOTATED PROVISIONAL AGENDA

29 March Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration.

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 20 December [on the report of the Second Committee (A/68/445)]

(~) 13 October Excellency,

Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities and Institutional Affairs

Economic and Social Council

General Assembly resolution on the repositioning of the United Nations development system, in the context of the QCPR

2. Resolved to establish a global network for the Resource Efficient and Cleaner Production (RECPnet); and

REVES AISBL European Network of Cities and Regions of Social Economy STATUTES

UNITED NATIONS MANDATES ON NGO ACCREDITATION AND PARTICIPATION IN UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCES AND MEETINGS

CP/RES (2036/15) STRUCTURE OF THE GENERAL SECRETARIAT. (Adopted by the Permanent Council at its meeting on September 30, 2015)

ST/SGB/2000/10. Secretariat. United Nations. Secretary-General s bulletin Organization of the Department of Political Affairs.

Major Groups and Other Stakeholders High Level Political Forum Coordination Mechanism Terms of Reference

INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS ACT

Distr. LIMITED LC/L.3344/Rev.1 1 September 2011 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: SPANISH

Agreement between the United Nations and the World Tourism Organization

Allocating State Authority in View of Constitutional Changes in Georgia

Improving the working methods of the Security Council

Governing Council of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme

2007/40 Non-legally binding instrument on all types of forests

\mj. (rffjj~j~ 17 July Excellency,

We aim at distributing to all Member States the revised version of the modalities resolution on Thursday 19 November 2015.

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION REPORT 2018/105. Audit of strategic support to the global humanitarian inter-agency coordination mechanisms

REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EXTERNAL AND INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS ON THE ACTIVITIES WITH PERMANENT OBSERVERS DURING

BASEL DECLARATION ON ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT. We, the Ministers and other heads of delegation from... States,

Zero draft paragraphs

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES Inter-American Council for Integral Development (CIDI)

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL MECHANISM OF ESCWA AND ITS SUBSIDIARY BODIES

INFORMATION DOCUMENT

LAO PEOPLE S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC PEACE INDEPENDENCE DEMOCRACY UNITY PROSPERITY

Further to my letter dated 12 June 2018,1 have the honour to enclose

BC-10/3: Indonesian-Swiss country-led initiative to improve the effectiveness of the Basel Convention

The Statutes of the Gunter Grass Society of Gdansk

CONSTITUTION OF THE ECOSYSTEM-BASED ADAPTATION FOR FOOD SECURITY ASSEMBLY

Staffing the departments for Voters List and IT in the SEC in order to increase the efficiency of the Commission

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 19 July [without reference to a Main Committee (A/65/L.85 and Add.1)] 65/311.

The Importance of Building Trust in the Business- Customs Relationship: Lessons from the Western Hemisphere

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 December [on the report of the Second Committee (A/68/439)]

Review of the Human Rights Treaty Bodies System Latin America Expert Regional Consultation, San José, Costa Rica November 2016 OUTCOMES DOCUMENT

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES Inter-American Council for Integral Development (CIDI)

Progress update on the consideration of a draft resolution regarding the development of a Global Pact for the Environment

THE M A PROGRAMME ON OCEAN RESOUBCES AID DEVELOPMENT OF LATIN AMEBICA AND THE CARIBBEAN UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

SIGNIS Civil Statutes Revised and Updated 2017 Approved by Assembly of Delegates, Québec, June 22 nd Statutes 2017

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES

Agenda Item 5: Stockholm + 50 an opportunity to consider a new long-term vision for the global environmental agenda in the context of the 2030 Agenda

A/C.2/67/L.22. General Assembly. United Nations. Final Draft 6 December 2012

World Future Council contribution to Rio+20 Outcomes. Theme II, Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development

DECISION No on the

PARTICIPATION OF SOCIAL ACTORS IN THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SUMMITS OF THE AMERICAS PROCESS Washington, D.C 9 December 2018 Original: Spanish

Transcription:

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Reform process 2012 IACHR methodology for reviewing regulatory provisions, policies, and practices in order to strengthen the inter-american human rights system Introduction 1 The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights was established in 1959 by the Organization of American States (OAS) with a mandate to promote and protect human rights in the region. The Commission monitors the situation of human rights in all the states of the Organization, handles individual complaints, and works through its thematic rapporteurships. The Commission promotes and protects the effective exercise of human rights through all these functions and through other promotional activities such as its thematic reports, press releases, responses to requests for information, and training of state agents, civil society organizations, and other actors of the system; every year, hundreds of such activities are carried out. On June 29, 2011, the Permanent Council of the OAS created a Special Working Group to Reflect on the Workings of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights with a view to Strengthening the Inter-American Human Rights System. On December 13, 2011 the Group adopted its Report and on January 25, 2012 the Report was approved by the Permanent Council. As a part of those processes, the IACHR is now considering the report in a receptive and constructive spirit. Additionally, many civil society organizations have expressed their opinion on the recommendations issued. For instance, on January 27, 2012, after the adoption of the recommendations of the Special Working Group by the Permanent Council, more than 90 human rights organizations signed a press release expressing their opinion on the recommendations and the need to open a space of dialogue for discussing them. On March 28, 2012, the International Coalition of Human Rights Organizations in the Americas, in representation of more than 700 organizations of the civil society, also expressed its opinion over some of the recommendations during a public hearing before the Commission. At its 144 th period of sessions, the IACHR decided to undertake an in-depth examination of its procedures and mechanisms, and as part of that analysis will carry out a consultation with the users of the Inter-American System. On May 30, 2012 the IACHR held the First Regional Seminar on the recommendations formulated by the Member States in the Report of the Special Working Group. In that Seminar, all actors underlined the importance of underscoring the scope, content, viability and means of implementation for the recommendations.

2 At its 145 th period of sessions, the Commission developed an agenda for its process of reform that includes addressing the concerns and recommendations presented in that report. In this document, the Commission announces the methodology it will employ in reviewing regulations, policies, and practices during the remainder of 2012. The Commission has been particularly careful to consider the work program of the Permanent Council and other actors of the Inter- American System to design its methodology, and trusts that it offers ample opportunities to establish points of contact between the processes carried out by the IACHR, the Permanent Council and other actors. Principles According to the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, juridical and political institutions [ ] have as their principal aim the protection of the essential rights of man. The Commission will have that aim in mind as it studies any proposals regarding its Rules, policies, and practices; any change or amendment will be based upon a fundamented conclusion as to how to improve the protection of human rights. In conducting the review, the Commission will be guided by the following principles: 1. Broad participation by all interested actors in the process of review of Rules, practices or policies implemented by the IACHR in relation to the aforementioned resolutions. Among the actors are the Member States of the Organization and other users of the system; 2. Consideration of all inputs submitted by the various actors and the adoption, in an independent, autonomous manner, of decisions conducive to the best performance of its mandate, and 3. The importance of making all of its activities as effective as possible. Methodology Calls for universal adoption The IACHR notes that an initial group of the Special Working Group s recommendations refer to activities to promote universal adoption of the system. In that regard, the IACHR emphasizes that: 1. The competence of the Commission is universal in the sense that all Member States of the Organization of American States are subject to monitoring of their human rights situations, to the system of individual petitions, and to follow-up in the thematic areas. 2. Member States must assume their responsibility for achieving universal ratification of the American Convention on Human Rights and other inter-american human rights instruments. The Commission accepts the States call for it to further this aim in every way it can, will emphasize its efforts in this regard, and will integrate promotion of universal adoption into all its visits and activities where appropriate.

3 Possible reforms Some of the recommendations to the IACHR by the Special Working Group refer to matters governed by the Rules of Procedure. This is true of the following areas in particular: 1. Individual petitions and cases, including friendly settlement; 2. Precautionary measures; 3. Monitoring of the situation in member states (e.g. Chapter IV ); and 4. Promotion. The Commission is now preparing consultations on these questions, which will be published on or before August 25, 2012. These documents will be the subject of broad consultation, open for comment to all users of the system during a minimum period of one month. The consultation will be carried out through the following means: 1. Formal invitation to the member states; 2. Invitation through lists of civil society organizations, and 3. Announcement on the IACHR website and social networks. Once the period for comments has ended circa September 25, 2012, the IACHR will determine the steps to be followed bearing in mind, to that respect, the working methodology of the Permanent Council of the Organization, and other relevant input. Other recommendations by the Special Working Group to the IACHR refer to institutional policy and practice, involving the following topics: 1. Permanent presidency; 2. Allocation of resources to different work areas; 3. Content, data, and statistics to be included in the Annual Report, and how it should be organized; 4. Dissemination of criteria and jurisprudence (including preparation of manuals); 5. Criteria for raising specific funds, and 6. Institutional structure. Although some of these topics, or specific aspects of them, may be subject to consultation, the Commission is already implementing measures that relate to the recommendations of the Special Working Group s Report. These, with any possible reforms to the Rules, policies and practices of the IACHR, will be communicated to the Permanent Council and broadly disseminated on or before September 30, 2012. Seminars and academic events

4 The IACHR will conduct and/or participate in sub-regional seminars and academic events organized in coordination with all actors in the System in August and September 2012, for deeper examination of the technical aspects of the reform agenda and its major themes. The Commission will organize Sub-regional Seminars in coordination with actors in Middle-America, the Andean Region, the Southern Cone, the Caribbean and North America to serve as fora for ample discussions, open to all users of the System and all interested in its strengthening. The IACHR will deploy its best efforts to ensure wide invitation and dissemination of contents. The Seminars will be the occasion to convoke experts, representatives of the Member States and civil society organizations, and draw conclusions on the topics of the process of reform. Collaboration with the Permanent Council The President of the IACHR will commit his best efforts to personally accompany the work of the Permanent Council. Furthermore, the Executive Secretary, or a person he appoints, will attend sessions and meetings, will provide the pertinent or necessary information, and will deal with any request directed to the IACHR. Public hearings The IACHR will convene two hearings on strengthening measures, on October 30, 2012, to give key actors an opportunity for dialogue in addition to the ample opportunities provided within the consultation process. The IACHR and its activities As for the system of individual petitions, a few indicators will illustrate the Commission s workload. There are around 8,500 matters pending before the IACHR: 7,000 in the initial examination phase; 1,000 in the admissibility phase, and 500 in the merits phase. Over its lifetime, the IACHR has received and responded to over 20,000 petitions. In recent years, the IACHR has received, annually, over 400 requests for precautionary measures that require swift decisions and provides follow-up to more than 580 matters including measures in effect and matters in which, without adopting measures, the IACHR has requested information with a view to reaching a decision. In 2011, the Commission s activities included three periods of sessions; receiving and recording over 1,600 new petitions; in connection with petitions, adopting 67 reports on admissibility, 11 reports on inadmissibility, eight reports on friendly settlement, 54 decisions to archive, and 25 reports on the merits; publishing five reports on the merits, and submitting 23 cases to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. They also included carrying out 91 hearings, 58 working meetings, over 30 working and promotion visits led by country rapporteurs or thematic rapporteurs, 138 press releases, conducting five seminars and training courses, and a broad range of promotion efforts. This shows the great number and diversity of demands the Commission faces and the various ways in which it protects and promotes human rights in the Hemisphere.

5 In its Strategic Plan, the IACHR emphasized that proper fulfillment of its mandate to promote and protect human rights in the Hemisphere would require a substantial increase in its budget, which, for 2012, should be increased to at least US$14,520,000. This year, however, the OAS has assigned to the IACHR 17 attorneys, 15 administrative staff persons, and, for operating expenses, US$946,000, for a total of US$4,779,700 (six percent of the overall OAS budget). Through its fundraising, the IACHR has secured US$1,049,863, as of June 30, 2012, in specific funds. In the second half of 2012, it expects to receive US$4,332,209, for a 2012 total of US$5,382,072 from specific funds. The IACHR takes this opportunity to thank Member and Observer States and other entities for their voluntary contributions, and calls for the gradual transformation of its regular budget to ensure the sustainability and predictability of its activities. If all these projections materialize, the IACHR will have received, from the general OAS budget, the states, and cooperation agencies, a total of US$10,161,772, or around 70% of what it needs under its Strategic Plan. The goals in the Strategic Plan will have to be amended accordingly. The IACHR has said repeatedly that the resources allocated are insufficient to enable it to discharge its mandate effectively. This results in an unacceptable case backlog and in severe limitations in the analyses requested by the General Assembly, visits and other promotion activities, participation in proceedings before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, difficulties in funding the Commission s third period of sessions, and restrictions in the functions of thematic rapporteurships. Some of the recommendations of the Report of the Special Working Group refer to this problem. In connection with this, the IACHR hopes that any decisions adopted will bear in mind its enormous workload and the urgent need to receive sufficient resources to discharge it efficiently. Adopted; August 3, 2012 Washington, D.C.