Aligning TOGAF and NAF Experiences from the Norwegian Armed Forces

Transcription

1 Aligning TOGAF and NAF Experiences from the Norwegian Armed Forces Håvard Jørgensen Tore Liland Stein Skogvold

2 Objectives and Background Establish a sustainable reference architecture for the Norwegian Armed Forces Technologies selected TOGAF Architecture Development Methodology (ADM) NATO Architecture Framework (NAF) Sparxsystems Enterprise Architect Unified Modeling Language (UML)

3 Previous Work Limitations High level mapping No implementation experience? Did not take into account TOGAF Content Framework (ACF) Metamodels The most recent revisions The Open Group: TOGAF and DoDAF whitepaper, 2006, 2010.

4 NAF and TOGAF Views Architecture Principles, Vision, and Requirements NATO All View Business Architecture Data Applications Technology NATO Capability View NATO Operational View NATO Service Oriented View NATO Operational View NATO System View Architecture Realization NATO Programme View NATO Technical View

5 Mapping Issues - Organizations NAV/NCV WholeLife Enterprise Enterprise Phase NOV Node Type? Actual Organization NSV Organization Type Capability Configuration

6 Mapping Issues - Processes Mission NAV-1/NOV-1: The strategic purpose of the enterprise Enduring Task Standard Operational Activity Operational Activity Service Service Function Function NCV-1: Tasks vital to reaching the objectives NCV-6: Standard procedures NOV-5: Activities and business processes Logical, independent of realization NOV-6: Dependencies, timing and flows of materials, people, things and energy NSOV-1: Services provided and consumed functionality, independent of who delivers it NSOV-5: Service functionality NSV-4: Procesess performed by systems and resources Implementation specific

7 Alignment? Conceptual Business Organisation Unit TOGAF Application Organisation Type NAF Software Physical Technology NAF TOGAF Business TOGAF Technology

8 Architecture Content Framework TOGAF Capability Process Organization Information Application Technology NAF Overarching (Conceptual) Reference (Logical) Baseline, Targets (Physical)

9 Capability Process Organization Application Technology Information Overarching Enterprise Vision/Goal Capability Mission Enduring Task Enterprise (Phase) Service Requirement Entity Reference Project Capability Increment Operational Activity NodeType Information Element Baseline/ Targets Capability Configuration Function Organization Resource ResourceType Software Artefact Data Element Actual Org., Actual Post Standard, Protocol

10 Experiences and Further Work Tool implementation 150 changes to MODAF M3 profiles Repositories structured according to NAF Simplification Tailored methodologies for specific stakeholders concerns NAF core Training Change proposals for NAF Core concepts, rather than separate, fragmented metamodels for each subview Simplified, more direct links Business architecture

11 Four Approaches to EA Focus Architecture Frameworks Management Consulting Business Enterprise Modeling FEA, BSC, SWOT, Metis Information Systems Users Enterprise Architecture Zachman, TOGAF, DoDAF, ARIS Software Engineering Software Model Driven Architecture UML, SOAML, RM-ODP Systems Engineering Hardware (Systems of) Systems Architecture MODAF, NAF, SysML, UPDM

12 EXTRA SLIDES

13 Operational Diversity Land, Sea, Air, Joint International operations and national defense Levels Political, Strategic, Operational, Tactical, Combat, Soldier Administrative Operational Support Operational Security (Top Secret), Secret, Confidential, Restricted, Unclassified Domains: National, NATO, Mission, Coalition Communication requirements Hard real time Bandwidth limitations Physical platforms vehicles, ships, planes

14 NAF & TOGAF NAV NCV NOV NSOV NSV NTV NPV A. Architecture vision B. Business architecture C. IS architecture D. Technology architecture E. Opportunities & solutions F. Migration planning G. Implementation governance H. Architecture change management

15 TOGAF Architecture Development Methodology

16

17

18 Architecture Types Scope Detail Impacts Audience Overarching Architecture Entire Organization Low Strategic Outcomes Policy Makers & Capability Planners Reference Architecture Service Grouping Medium Operational Outcomes Capability & Project Managers Target Architecture Component High Tactical Outcomes Developers

19 DoDAF, NAF, MODAF Views

20 TOGAF Architecture Landscape

21 NAF Architecture Landscape

22 NATO Architecture Framework

23 Nodes and Processes Who Does What? Enterprise Phase Mission Enduring Task Capability Standard Operational Activity NodeType Operational Activity Service Service Function ResourceType Function