Executive Summary Conditional Use Authorization

Transcription

1 Executive Summary Conditional Use Authorization HEARING DATE: JULY 28, 2016 Date: July 21, 2016 Case No.: CUA Project Address: 399 SAN FERNANDO WAY Zoning: RH-1(D) (Residential House, One Family Detached) 40-X Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 3257/017 Project Sponsor: Chris Dorman Dorman Associates, Inc. 234 Shoreline Highway Mill Valley, CA Staff Contact: Veronica Flores (415) Recommendation: Approve with Conditions PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project Sponsor proposes to legalize an existing child care facility (d.b.a. YMCA) serving more than 30 children. The facility has been operating at the project site since The project does not seek to physically expand the building, but will replace three windows at the front façade facing onto Ocean Avenue. The child care facility would operate Monday through Friday, between the hours of 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PRESENT USE The project is located on the northwest corner of the intersection with Ocean Avenue, Block 3257, Lot 017. The property is developed with a church and YMCA within a one-story building with an additional partial-lower level. The subject property is a corner lot, with approximately 224 feet of frontage on San Fernando Way and about 90 feet of frontage on Ocean Avenue. The existing building is 16,480 square feet in size and the enclosed building area covers approximately 50% of the lot. The rear yard extends about 30 deep and abuts the adjacent residential property and walkway to the north. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOOD The project site is located at the intersection of San Fernando Way and Ocean Avenue. Immediately to the west is the Commodore Sloat Elementary School Playground. To the east are residences in the West of Twin Peaks neighborhood. To the south there is an NC-1 District with a variety of neighborhood-serving uses including a mixture of food establishments, personal services, and dental/doctor practices. The

2 Executive Summary Hearing Date: July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way surrounding properties are located within the RH-1(D) (Residential House, One-Family Detached), P (Public), and NC-1 (Neighborhood Commercial, Cluster) Districts. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Department has determined that the proposed project is exempt/excluded from environmental review, pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section (Class One - Minor Alteration of Existing Facility, (e) Additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 square feet). HEARING NOTIFICATION TYPE REQUIRED PERIOD REQUIRED NOTICE DATE ACTUAL NOTICE DATE ACTUAL PERIOD Classified News Ad 20 days July 8, 2016 July 8, days Posted Notice 20 days July 8, 2016 July 8, days Mailed Notice 10 days July 18, 2016 July 8, days The proposal requires a Section 312 neighborhood notification, which was conducted in conjunction with the conditional use authorization process. PUBLIC COMMENT To date, the Department has received one communication in opposition to the project from the Balboa Terrace Homes Association. ISSUES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS The Zoning Control Table within Planning Code Section conditionally permits a Child Care Facility with more than 15 children within an RH-1 District. This Conditional Use Authorization is the result of Enforcement Case No _ENF as the result of a complaint filed in late The project sponsor worked with the Department on filing a Conditional Use Authorization application. The Department is not aware of any other complaints regarding the project. Upon reviewing the submitted School Drop-Off and Pick-Up Management Plan submittal, the Department determined that there is adequate passenger loading space and that no additional transportation analysis is required. Noise mitigation, often a concern with child care facilities, will be achieved through the proposed window replacements. Additionally, the children will only use the outdoor play area for approximately 2-3 hours per day depending on the weather. 2

3 Executive Summary Hearing Date: July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way REQUIRED COMMISSION ACTION In order for the project to proceed, the Commission must grant conditional use authorization to legalize the existing child care facility (d.b.a. YMCA) serving more than 15 children within the RH-1(D) District, pursuant to Planning Code Section BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION The existing child care facility has been in operation at this project site since 1998 and there have not been any noise, traffic, or other complaints regarding the use. The child care facility continues to provide a needed service for this community. The YMCA is currently licensed by the State of California and will meet other requirements for state certification. The project promotes the continued operation of an established business. The project would not displace an existing tenant. The project will not adversely impact any potential historic resource, performing window replacements in keeping with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards. The project will not have significant noise impacts to the surrounding neighbors. The project will meet all state requirements for the certification of child care facilities. The project meets all applicable requirements of the Planning Code. The project is desirable for, and compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The business would serve the immediate neighborhood and provides a community need. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions Attachments: Draft Conditional Use Authorization Motion Block Book Map Sanborn Map Zoning Map Aerial Photographs Site Photographs Categorical Exemption Block Book Notification Project Sponsor Submittal School Drop-Off and Pick-Up Management Plan Project Licensing Requirements Reduced Plans Public Comments 3

4 Executive Summary Hearing Date: July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way Attachment Checklist Executive Summary Draft Motion Environmental Determination Zoning District Map Height & Bulk Map Parcel Map Sanborn Map Aerial Photo Context Photos Site Photos Project sponsor submittal Drawings: Existing Conditions Check for legibility Drawings: Proposed Project Check for legibility 3-D Renderings (new construction or significant addition) Check for legibility Wireless Telecommunications Materials Health Dept. review of RF levels RF Report Community Meeting Notice Housing Documents Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program: Affidavit for Compliance Exhibits above marked with an X are included in this packet VAF Planner's Initials VF: I:\Cases\2015\ CUA San Fernando Way\399 San Fernando Way_ExecutiveSummary.doc 4

5 Subject to: (Select only if applicable) Affordable Housing (Sec. 415) Jobs Housing Linkage Program (Sec. 413) Downtown Park Fee (Sec. 412) First Source Hiring (Admin. Code) Child Care Requirement (Sec. 414) Other Planning Commission Draft Motion HEARING DATE: JULY 28, 2016 Case No.: CUA Project Address: 399 SAN FERNANDO WAY Zoning: RH-1(D) (Residential House, One Family Detached) 40-X Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 3257/017 Project Sponsor: Chris Dorman Dorman Associates, Inc. 234 Shoreline Highway Mill Valley, CA Staff Contact: Veronica Flores (415) ADOPTING FINDINGS RELATING TO THE APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 303 AND OF THE PLANNING CODE TO LEGALIZE AN EXISTING CHILD CARE FACILITY SERVING MORE THAN 30 CHILDREN WITHIN THE CHURCH ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH A LOT SIZE OF 24,746 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE RH-1(D) (RESIDENTIAL HOUSE, ONE-FAMILY - DETACHED) DISTRICT AND A 40-X HEIGHT AND BULK DISTRICT. THIS IS THE RESULT OF ENFORCEMENT CASE NO _ENF. PREAMBLE On August 18, 2015 Chris Dorman (hereinafter Project Sponsor ) filed an application with the Planning Department (hereinafter Department ) for Conditional Use Authorization under Planning Code Section to legalize an existing child care facility serving more than 30 children on the subject property with a lot size of 24,746 square feet within the RH-1(D) (Residential House, One-Family Detached) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District. On July 28, 2016, the San Francisco Planning Commission (hereinafter Commission ) conducted a duly noticed public hearing at a regularly scheduled meeting on Conditional Use Application No CUA.

6 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way The Department has determined that the proposed project is exempt/excluded from environmental review, pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section (Class One - Minor Alteration of Existing Facility, (e) Additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 square feet). The Commission has heard and considered the testimony presented to it at the public hearing and has further considered written materials and oral testimony presented on behalf of the applicant, Department staff, and other interested parties. MOVED, that the Commission hereby authorizes the Conditional Use requested in Application No CUA, subject to the conditions contained in EXHIBIT A of this motion, based on the following findings: FINDINGS Having reviewed the materials identified in the preamble above, and having heard all testimony and arguments, this Commission finds, concludes, and determines as follows: 1. The above recitals are accurate and constitute findings of this Commission. 2. Site Description and Present Use. The project is located on the northwest corner of the intersection with Ocean Avenue, Block 3257, Lot 017. The property is developed with a church and YMCA within a one-story building with an additional partial-lower level. The subject property is a corner lot, with approximately 224 feet of frontage on San Fernando Way and about 90 feet of frontage on Ocean Avenue. The existing building is 16,480 square feet in size and the enclosed building area covers approximately 50% of the lot. The rear yard extends about 30 deep and abuts the adjacent residential property and walkway to the north. 3. Surrounding Properties and Neighborhood. The project site is located at the intersection of San Fernando Way and Ocean Avenue. Immediately to the west is the Commodore Sloat Elementary School Playground. To the east are residences in the West of Twin Peaks neighborhood. To the south there is an NC-1 District with a variety of neighborhood-serving uses including a mixture of food establishments, personal services, and dental/doctor practices. The surrounding properties are located within the RH-1(D) (Residential House, One-Family Detached), P (Public), and NC-1 (Neighborhood Commercial, Cluster) Districts. 4. Project Description. The applicant proposes to legalize an existing child care facility (d.b.a. YMCA) serving more than 30 children. The facility has been operating at the project site since The project does not seek to physically expand the building, but will replace three windows at the front façade facing onto Ocean Avenue. The child care facility would operate Monday through Friday, between the hours of 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. The proposal requires a change of use and Section 312-neighborhood notification was conducted in conjunction with the Conditional Use Authorization process. The proposed use is a neighborhood-serving use. 2

7 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way The proposed operation consists of 6 employees. The majority of employees live in the immediate surrounding area and walk or take transit to work. Two employees commute using their personal cars. The subject site is well served by public transit so that potential customers should not adversely affect the traffic flow. Four to eight students are typically dropped off within 15 minute increments, with parents parking in loading zone along San Fernando Way and walking children into the site to sign children in and out. Typical a.m. drop-off time occurs between 8:00am and 9:15am, and typical p.m. pick-up time occurs between 4:30pm and 6:00pm. The church on site hosts a food bank every Wednesday from 3:30pm to 4:30pm. The delivery truck occupies the loading zone along San Fernando Way for about 30 minutes to unload supplies. 5. Public Comment. To date, the Department has received one communication in opposition to the project from the Balboa Terrace Homes Association. 6. Planning Code Compliance: The Commission finds that the Project is consistent with the relevant provisions of the Planning Code in the following manner: A. Use. The Zoning Control table of Planning Code Section requires Conditional Use Authorization for a Child Care Facility providing care for 15 or more children within an RH-1 District. The Project proposes to legalize a Child Care Facility serving more than 30 students in the existing building. The proposed floor plan is open in nature and the classroom and teaching spaces will be located on the lower level. YMCA is currently licensed by the State of California, and they intend to limit the number of children in the play yard at any one time. The business will also meet the other requirements for state certification with regard to indoor classroom space, numbers of sinks and toilets, availability of drinking water, and staff to children ratio. Pursuant to Planning Code Sections 209.1, the Project Sponsor is seeking Conditional Use Authorization to legalize this use. B. Rear Yard Requirement in the RH-1(D) Districts. Planning Code Section 134 states that the minimum rear yard depth shall be equal to 25 percent of the total depth of a lot in which it is situated, but in no case less than 15 feet. The existing structure was built in 1928 and is considered a legal, noncomplying structure with respect to the rear yard requirement as it is partially located in the required rear yard area. The Project does not propose any additional building expansion, and is permitted to continue as a noncomplying structure per Planning Code Section 180(c). C. Off-Street Parking. Planning Code Section 151 requires one (1) off-street parking space for every 25 children to be accommodated at any one time, where the number of such children exceeds 24. 3

8 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way The Project serves 34 children, which requires one (1) off-street parking space. The Project Sponsor will provide an additional one (1) Class 1 bicycle parking space to replace the required off-street parking, pursuant to Planning Code Section 150(e). The Zoning Administrator may also reduce the off-street parking for this Project pursuant to Planning Code Section 161(g). D. Bicycle Parking. The bicycle parking requirements of Planning Code Section apply when a change of occupancy or use would increase the number of total required bicycle parking spaces (inclusive of Class 1 and 2 spaces in aggregate) by 15 percent. This same Code Section requires Child Care Facilities to provide two (2) Class 1 spaces AND one (1) Class 2 space for every 20 children. The project is to legalize a child care facility and thus considered a change of use. The proposal serves 34 students and therefore requires a minimum of two Class 1 bicycle parking spaces and one Class 2 bicycle parking space. The Project is proposing to provide, in total, four (4) Class 1 bicycle parking spaces within the subject property as shown on the proposed site plan. One of these Class 1 bicycle parking spaces will substitute the required Class 2 bicycle parking space. E. Signage. Currently, there is not a proposed sign program on file with the Planning Department. The proposed business does not have a name as of this writing. Any proposed signage will be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. 7. Planning Code Section 303 establishes criteria for the Planning Commission to consider when reviewing applications for Conditional Use approval. On balance, the project does comply with said criteria in that: A. The proposed new uses and building, at the size and intensity contemplated and at the proposed location, will provide a development that is necessary or desirable, and compatible with, the neighborhood or the community. The Project will not increase the number of students being served and will not intensify the use of the site. The building structure and site will remain the same. Within the city generally, and this zip code and neighborhood specifically, child care services are in high demand. The neighborhoods near the Project have higher rates of young children, and the difficulty of finding quality, affordable child care has contributed to working families leaving the city. B. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, convenience or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. There are no features of the project that could be detrimental to the health, safety or convenience of those residing or working the area, in that: i. Nature of proposed site, including its size and shape, and the proposed size, shape and arrangement of structures; 4

9 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way The height and bulk of the existing building will remain the same and will not alter the existing character of the project vicinity. The only proposed work to the exterior involves replacing three windows facing Ocean Avenue with in-kind materials. The proposed work will not affect the building envelope. The parcel also has open space at the side of the lot. The Project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, convenience or general welfare of those in the vicinity. ii. The accessibility and traffic patterns for persons and vehicles, the type and volume of such traffic, and the adequacy of proposed off-street parking and loading; The child care facility will not have a significant transportation impact since drop-off and pick-up times are staggered. The site is accessible by foot, bicycle, and served by the Muni and currently enrolled families make use of these alternative methods of transportation. The Muni K- Ingleside/T-Third Street line is one block southeast, with a stop at the intersection of Ocean Avenue and San Leandro Way, and the Muni M-Ocean View line is three blocks northwest, with a stop on Ocean Avenue between Lagunitas and Woodacre Drives. iii. The safeguards afforded to prevent noxious or offensive emissions such as noise, glare, dust and odor; The Project will not create any noxious or offensive emissions such as glare, dust or odor. The Project Sponsor is introducing an improvement measure to upgrade three windows facing onto Ocean Avenue. iv. Treatment given, as appropriate, to such aspects as landscaping, screening, open spaces, parking and loading areas, service areas, lighting and signs; There are no proposed changes to the existing landscaping and screening of the site, and will obtain the necessary building permits for any new signs. C. That the use as proposed will comply with the applicable provisions of the Planning Code and will not adversely affect the General Plan. The Project complies with all relevant requirements and standards of the Planning Code and is consistent with objectives and policies of the General Plan as detailed below. D. That the use as proposed would provide development that is in conformity with the purpose of the applicable Neighborhood Commercial District. The Project is located within an RH-1(D) District and is compatible with the existing neighborhood context. The use will provide a compatible neighborhood-serving use for the immediately surrounding neighborhoods during daytime hours. 8. General Plan Compliance. The Project is, on balance, consistent with the following Objectives and Policies of the General Plan: 5

10 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY ELEMENT Objectives and Policies OBJECTIVE 1: MANAGE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND CHANGE TO ENSURE ENHANCEMENT OF THE TOTAL CITY LIVING AND WORKINIG ENVIRONMENT. Policy 1.1: Encourage development which provides substantial net benefits and minimizes undesirable consequences. Discourage development that has substantial undesirable consequences that cannot be mitigated. Policy 1.2: Assure that all commercial and industrial uses meet minimum, reasonable performance standards. Policy 1.3: Locate commercial and industrial activities according to a generalized commercial and industrial land use plan. The Project would enhance the city living and working environment by providing needed child care services for residents and workers within the City. The Project will comply with State licensing requirements for child care facilities, further minimizing possible undesirable consequences from such an operation. OBJECTIVE 2: MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE A SOUND AND DIVERSE ECONOMIC BASE AND FISCAL STRUCTURE FOR THE CITY. Policy 2.1: Seek to retain existing commercial and industrial activity and to attract new such activity to the City. The Project will retain an existing commercial activity and will enhance the diverse economic base of the City. OBJECTIVE 3: PROVIDE EXPANDED EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR CITY RESIDENTS, PARTICULARLY THE UNEMPLOYED AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED. Policy 3.1: Promote the attraction, retention and expansion of commercial and industrial firms which provide employment improvement opportunities for unskilled and semi-skilled workers. 6

11 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way The Project will maintain the six employment opportunities for San Francisco residents. Also, the provision of child care services is an amenity that would attract or retain workers. OBJECTIVE 7: ENHANCE SAN FRANCISCO S POSITION AS A NATIONAL AND REGINAL CENTER FOR GOVERNMENT, HEALTH, AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES. Policy 7.2: Encourage the extension of needed health and educational services, but manage expansion to avoid or minimize disruption of adjacent residential areas. Policy 7.3: Promote the provision of adequate health and educational services to all geographic districts and cultural groups in the city. The proposed child care center will provide educational services for the children of San Francisco residents, particularly to the West of Twin Peaks and surrounding neighborhoods. No physical expansion is proposed to the existing building and a majority of the proposed child care facility s activities will take place indoors, hence the adjacent residential uses will not be disrupted. The students will utilize the outdoor play area for approximately 2-3 hours a day depending on the weather. 9. Planning Code Section 101.1(b) establishes eight priority-planning policies and requires review of permits for consistency with said policies. On balance, the project does comply with said policies in that: A. That existing neighborhood-serving retail uses be preserved and enhanced and future opportunities for resident employment in and ownership of such businesses be enhanced. The Project will be located in an existing structure, so there will not be any displacement of existing neighborhood-serving retail uses. The YMCA will maintain the six employment opportunities for San Francisco residents. B. That existing housing and neighborhood character be conserved and protected in order to preserve the cultural and economic diversity of our neighborhoods. The Project will not require any expansion or major alteration of the building; therefore there will be no impact to the existing neighborhood character or housing. C. That the City's supply of affordable housing be preserved and enhanced, No housing is removed for this Project. D. That commuter traffic not impede MUNI transit service or overburden our streets or neighborhood parking. 7

12 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way The Project will not impede Muni transit service or overburden City streets or neighborhood parking. The site is accessible by foot, bicycle, and served by the Muni and currently enrolled families make use of these alternative methods of transportation. The Muni K-Ingleside/T-Third Street line is one block southeast, with a stop at the intersection of Ocean Avenue and San Leandro Way, and the Muni M- Ocean View line is three blocks northwest, with a stop on Ocean Avenue between Lagunitas and Woodacre Drives. E. That a diverse economic base be maintained by protecting our industrial and service sectors from displacement due to commercial office development, and that future opportunities for resident employment and ownership in these sectors be enhanced. The Project will not displace any service or industry establishment. The project will not affect industrial or service sector uses or related employment opportunities. Ownership of industrial or service sector businesses will not be affected by this project. F. That the City achieve the greatest possible preparedness to protect against injury and loss of life in an earthquake. This proposal will not impact the property s ability to withstand an earthquake. G. That landmarks and historic buildings be preserved. The subject property is located within the Balboa Terrace Historic District; however, no landmarks or historic buildings will be adversely affected by the Project. The proposed replacement windows facing onto Ocean Avenue will include wood sash windows, mullions, true divided-lites, and ogee lugs to match the existing windows. H. That our parks and open space and their access to sunlight and vistas be protected from development. The project will have no negative impact on existing parks and open spaces because there would be no physical change to the existing building. 10. The Project is consistent with and would promote the general and specific purposes of the Code provided under Section 101.1(b) in that, as designed, the Project would contribute to the character and stability of the neighborhood and would constitute a beneficial development. 11. The Commission hereby finds that approval of the Conditional Use authorization would promote the health, safety and welfare of the City. 8

13 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way DECISION That based upon the Record, the submissions by the Applicant, the staff of the Department and other interested parties, the oral testimony presented to this Commission at the public hearings, and all other written materials submitted by all parties, the Commission hereby APPROVES Conditional Use Application No CUA subject to the following conditions attached hereto as EXHIBIT A in general conformance with plans on file, dated April 4, 2016, and stamped EXHIBIT B, which is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. APPEAL AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF MOTION: Any aggrieved person may appeal this Conditional Use Authorization to the Board of Supervisors within thirty (30) days after the date of this Motion No. XXXXX. The effective date of this Motion shall be the date of this Motion if not appealed (After the 30- day period has expired) OR the date of the decision of the Board of Supervisors if appealed to the Board of Supervisors. For further information, please contact the Board of Supervisors at (415) , City Hall, Room 244, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, San Francisco, CA Protest of Fee or Exaction: You may protest any fee or exaction subject to Government Code Section that is imposed as a condition of approval by following the procedures set forth in Government Code Section The protest must satisfy the requirements of Government Code Section 66020(a) and must be filed within 90 days of the date of the first approval or conditional approval of the development referencing the challenged fee or exaction. For purposes of Government Code Section 66020, the date of imposition of the fee shall be the date of the earliest discretionary approval by the City of the subject development. If the City has not previously given Notice of an earlier discretionary approval of the project, the Planning Commission s adoption of this Motion, Resolution, Discretionary Review Action or the Zoning Administrator s Variance Decision Letter constitutes the approval or conditional approval of the development and the City hereby gives NOTICE that the 90-day protest period under Government Code Section has begun. If the City has already given Notice that the 90-day approval period has begun for the subject development, then this document does not re-commence the 90-day approval period. I hereby certify that the Planning Commission ADOPTED the foregoing Motion on July 28, Jonas P. Ionin Commission Secretary AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ADOPTED: July 28,

14 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way AUTHORIZATION EXHIBIT A This authorization is for a conditional use to legalize an existing child care facility (d.b.a. YMCA) located at 399 San Fernando Way, Block 3257, Lot 017 pursuant to Planning Code Section within the RH- 1(D) (Residential House, One-Family Detached) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District; in general conformance with plans, dated April 4, 2016, and stamped EXHIBIT B included in the docket for Case No CUA and subject to conditions of approval reviewed and approved by the Commission on July 28, 2016 under Motion No XXXXXX. This authorization and the conditions contained herein run with the property and not with a particular Project Sponsor, business, or operator. RECORDATION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Prior to the issuance of the building permit or commencement of use for the Project the Zoning Administrator shall approve and order the recordation of a Notice in the Official Records of the Recorder of the City and County of San Francisco for the subject property. This Notice shall state that the project is subject to the conditions of approval contained herein and reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on July 28, 2016 under Motion No XXXXXX. PRINTING OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ON PLANS The conditions of approval under the 'Exhibit A' of this Planning Commission Motion No. XXXXXX shall be reproduced on the Index Sheet of construction plans submitted with the Site or Building permit application for the Project. The Index Sheet of the construction plans shall reference to the Conditional Use authorization and any subsequent amendments or modifications. SEVERABILITY The Project shall comply with all applicable City codes and requirements. If any clause, sentence, section or any part of these conditions of approval is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect or impair other remaining clauses, sentences, or sections of these conditions. This decision conveys no right to construct, or to receive a building permit. Project Sponsor shall include any subsequent responsible party. CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS Changes to the approved plans may be approved administratively by the Zoning Administrator. Significant changes and modifications of conditions shall require Planning Commission approval of a new Conditional Use authorization. 10

15 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way Conditions of Approval, Compliance, Monitoring, and Reporting PERFORMANCE 1. Validity. The authorization and right vested by virtue of this action is valid for three (3) years from the effective date of the Motion. The Department of Building Inspection shall have issued a Building Permit or Site Permit to construct the project and/or commence the approved use within this three-year period. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , 2. Expiration and Renewal. Should a Building or Site Permit be sought after the three (3) year period has lapsed, the project sponsor must seek a renewal of this Authorization by filing an application for an amendment to the original Authorization or a new application for Authorization. Should the project sponsor decline to so file, and decline to withdraw the permit application, the Commission shall conduct a public hearing in order to consider the revocation of the Authorization. Should the Commission not revoke the Authorization following the closure of the public hearing, the Commission shall determine the extension of time for the continued validity of the Authorization. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , 3. Diligent pursuit. Once a site or Building Permit has been issued, construction must commence within the timeframe required by the Department of Building Inspection and be continued diligently to completion. Failure to do so shall be grounds for the Commission to consider revoking the approval if more than three (3) years have passed since this Authorization was approved. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , 4. Extension. All time limits in the preceding three paragraphs may be extended at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator where implementation of the project is delayed by a public agency, an appeal or a legal challenge and only by the length of time for which such public agency, appeal or challenge has caused delay. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , 5. Conformity with Current Law. No application for Building Permit, Site Permit, or other entitlement shall be approved unless it complies with all applicable provisions of City Codes in effect at the time of such approval. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , 11

16 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way DESIGN 6. Garbage, composting and recycling storage. Space for the collection and storage of garbage, composting, and recycling shall be provided within enclosed areas on the property and clearly labeled and illustrated on the architectural addenda. Space for the collection and storage of recyclable and compostable materials that meets the size, location, accessibility and other standards specified by the San Francisco Recycling Program shall be provided at the ground level of the buildings. For information about compliance, contact the Case Planner, Planning Department at , MONITORING 7. Enforcement. Violation of any of the Planning Department conditions of approval contained in this Motion or of any other provisions of Planning Code applicable to this Project shall be subject to the enforcement procedures and administrative penalties set forth under Planning Code Section 176 or Section The Planning Department may also refer the violation complaints to other city departments and agencies for appropriate enforcement action under their jurisdiction. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , 8. Revocation due to Violation of Conditions. Should implementation of this Project result in complaints from interested property owners, residents, or commercial lessees which are not resolved by the Project Sponsor and found to be in violation of the Planning Code and/or the specific conditions of approval for the Project as set forth in Exhibit A of this Motion, the Zoning Administrator shall refer such complaints to the Commission, after which it may hold a public hearing on the matter to consider revocation of this authorization. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , OPERATION 9. Garbage, Recycling, and Composting Receptacles. Garbage, recycling, and compost containers shall be kept within the premises and hidden from public view, and placed outside only when being serviced by the disposal company. Trash shall be contained and disposed of pursuant to garbage and recycling receptacles guidelines set forth by the Department of Public Works. For information about compliance, contact Bureau of Street Use and Mapping, Department of Public Works at , Sidewalk Maintenance. The Project Sponsor shall maintain the main entrance to the building and all sidewalks abutting the subject property in a clean and sanitary condition in compliance with the Department of Public Works Streets and Sidewalk Maintenance Standards. For information about compliance, contact Bureau of Street Use and Mapping, Department of Public Works, , 12

17 Draft Motion July 28, 2016 CASE NO CUA 399 San Fernando Way 11. Community Liaison. Prior to issuance of a building permit to construct the project and implement the approved use, the Project Sponsor shall appoint a community liaison officer to deal with the issues of concern to owners and occupants of nearby properties. The Project Sponsor shall provide the Zoning Administrator with written notice of the name, business address, and telephone number of the community liaison. Should the contact information change, the Zoning Administrator shall be made aware of such change. The community liaison shall report to the Zoning Administrator what issues, if any, are of concern to the community and what issues have not been resolved by the Project Sponsor. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , 13

18 This page intentionally blank.

19 Exhibits Conditional Use Authorization Hearing Case Number CUA 399 San Fernando Way

20 Parcel Map SUBJECT PROPERTY Conditional Use Authorization Hearing Case Number CUA 399 San Fernando Way

21 Sanborn Map* *The Sanborn Maps in San Francisco have not been updated since 1998, and this map may not accurately reflect existing conditions. SUBJECT PROPERTY Conditional Use Authorization Hearing Case Number CUA 399 San Fernando Way

22 Zoning Map Conditional Use Authorization Hearing Case Number CUA 399 San Fernando Way

23 Aerial Photo SUBJECT PROPERTY Conditional Use Authorization Hearing Case Number CUA 399 San Fernando Way

24 Aerial Photo SUBJECT PROPERTY Conditional Use Authorization Hearing Case Number CUA 399 San Fernando Way

25 Aerial Photo SUBJECT PROPERTY Conditional Use Authorization Hearing Case Number CUA 399 San Fernando Way

26 Aerial Photo SUBJECT PROPERTY Conditional Use Authorization Hearing Case Number CUA 399 San Fernando Way

27 Site Photo SUBJECT PROPERTY Conditional Use Authorization Hearing Case Number CUA 399 San Fernando Way

28 This page intentionally blank.

29 CEQA Categorical Exemption Determination PROPERTY INFORMATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Address Block/Lot(s) Case No. Permit No. Plans Dated Addition/ Alteration Demolition (requires HRER if over 45 years old) Project description for Planning Department approval. New Construction Project Modification (GO TO STEP 7) STEP 1: EXEMPTION CLASS TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER *Note: If neither class applies, an Environmental Evaluation Application is required.* Class 1 Existing Facilities. Interior and exterior alterations; additions under 10,000 sq. ft. Class 3 New Construction/ Conversion of Small Structures. Up to three (3) new single family residences or six (6) dwelling units in one building; commercial/office structures; utility extensions.;.; change of use under 10,000 sq. ft. if principally permitted or with a CU. Change of use under 10,000 sq. ft. if principally permitted or with a CU. Class STEP 2: CEQA IMPACTS TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER If any box is checked below, an Environmental Evaluation Application is required. Air Quality: Would the project add new sensitive receptors (specifically, schools, day care facilities, hospitals, residential dwellings, and senior care facilities) within an Air Pollution Exposure Zone? Does the project have the potential to emit substantial pollutant concentrations (e.g., backup diesel generators, heavy industry, diesel trucks)? Exceptions: do not check box if the applicant presents documentation of enrollment in the San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) Article 38 program and the project would not have the potential to emit substantial pollutant concentrations. (refer to EP _ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Air Pollutant Exposure Zone) Hazardous Materials: If the project site is located on the Maher map or is suspected of containing hazardous materials (based on a previous use such as gas station, auto repair, dry cleaners, or heavy manufacturing, or a site with underground storage tanks): Would the project involve 50 cubic yards or more of soil disturbance or a change of use from industrial to residential? If yes, this box must be checked and the project applicant must submit an Environmental Application with a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Exceptions: do not check box if the applicant presents documentation of enrollment in the San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) Maher program, a DPH waiver from the Revised: 4/11/16

30 Maher program, or other documentation from Environmental Planning staff that hazardous material effects would be less than significant (refer to EP_ArcMap > Maher layer). Transportation: Does the project create six (6) or more net new parking spaces or residential units? Does the project have the potential to adversely affect transit, pedestrian and/or bicycle safety (hazards) or the adequacy of nearby transit, pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities? Archeological Resources: Would the project result in soil disturbance/modification greater than two (2) feet below grade in an archeological sensitive area or eight (8) feet in a non archeological sensitive area? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Archeological Sensitive Area) Subdivision/Lot Line Adjustment: Does the project site involve a subdivision or lot line adjustment on a lot with a slope average of 20% or more? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Topography) Slope = or > 20%: Does the project involve any of the following: (1) square footage expansion greater than 1,000 sq. ft. outside of the existing building footprint, (2) excavation of 50 cubic yards or more of soil, (3) new construction? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Topography) If box is checked, a geotechnical report is required. Seismic: Landslide Zone: Does the project involve any of the following: (1) square footage expansion greater than 1,000 sq. ft. outside of the existing building footprint, (2) excavation of 50 cubic yards or more of soil, (3) new construction? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Seismic Hazard Zones) If box is checked, a geotechnical report is required. Seismic: Liquefaction Zone: Does the project involve any of the following: (1) square footage expansion greater than 1,000 sq. ft. outside of the existing building footprint, (2) excavation of 50 cubic yards or more of soil, (3) new construction? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Seismic Hazard Zones) If box is checked, a geotechnical report will likely be required. If no boxes are checked above, GO TO STEP 3. If one or more boxes are checked above, an Environmental Evaluation Application is required, unless reviewed by an Environmental Planner. Project can proceed with categorical exemption review. The project does not trigger any of the CEQA impacts listed above. Comments and Planner Signature (optional): STEP 3: PROPERTY STATUS HISTORIC RESOURCE TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER PROPERTY IS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: (refer to Parcel Information Map) Category A: Known Historical Resource. GO TO STEP 5. Category B: Potential Historical Resource (over 45 years of age). GO TO STEP 4. Category C: Not a Historical Resource or Not Age Eligible (under 45 years of age). GO TO STEP 6. Revised: 4/11/16 2

31 STEP 4: PROPOSED WORK CHECKLIST TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER Check all that apply to the project. 1. Change of use and new construction. Tenant improvements not included. 2. Regular maintenance or repair to correct or repair deterioration, decay, or damage to building. 3. Window replacement that meets the Department s Window Replacement Standards. Does not include storefront window alterations. 4. Garage work. A new opening that meets the Guidelines for Adding Garages and Curb Cuts, and/or replacement of a garage door in an existing opening that meets the Residential Design Guidelines. 5. Deck, terrace construction, or fences not visible from any immediately adjacent public right of way. 6. Mechanical equipment installation that is not visible from any immediately adjacent public right ofway. 7. Dormer installation that meets the requirements for exemption from public notification under Zoning Administrator Bulletin No. 3: Dormer Windows. 8. Addition(s) that are not visible from any immediately adjacent public right of way for 150 feet in each direction; does not extend vertically beyond the floor level of the top story of the structure or is only a single story in height; does not have a footprint that is more than 50% larger than that of the original building; and does not cause the removal of architectural significant roofing features. Note: Project Planner must check box below before proceeding. Project is not listed. GO TO STEP 5. Project does not conform to the scopes of work. GO TO STEP 5. Project involves four or more work descriptions. GO TO STEP 5. Project involves less than four work descriptions. GO TO STEP 6. STEP 5: CEQA IMPACTS ADVANCED HISTORICAL REVIEW TO BE COMPLETED BY PRESERVATION PLANNER Check all that apply to the project. 1. Project involves a known historical resource (CEQA Category A) as determined by Step 3 and conforms entirely to proposed work checklist in Step Interior alterations to publicly accessible spaces. 3. Window replacement of original/historic windows that are not in kind but are consistent with existing historic character. 4. Façade/storefront alterations that do not remove, alter, or obscure character defining features. 5. Raising the building in a manner that does not remove, alter, or obscure character defining features. 6. Restoration based upon documented evidence of a building s historic condition, such as historic photographs, plans, physical evidence, or similar buildings. 7. Addition(s), including mechanical equipment that are minimally visible from a public right of way and meet the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation. 8. Other work consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (specify or add comments): 3 Revised: 4/11/16

32 9. Other work that would not materially impair a historic district (specify or add comments): (Requires approval by Senior Preservation Planner/Preservation Coordinator) 10. Reclassification of property status. (Requires approval by Senior Preservation Planner/Preservation Coordinator) Reclassify to Category A Reclassify to Category C a. Per HRER dated: (attach HRER) b. Other (specify): Note: If ANY box in STEP 5 above is checked, a Preservation Planner MUST check one box below. Further environmental review required. Based on the information provided, the project requires an Environmental Evaluation Application to be submitted. GO TO STEP 6. Project can proceed with categorical exemption review. The project has been reviewed by the Preservation Planner and can proceed with categorical exemption review. GO TO STEP 6. Comments (optional): Preservation Planner Signature: STEP 6: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DETERMINATION TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER Further environmental review required. Proposed project does not meet scopes of work in either (check all that apply): Step 2 CEQA Impacts Step 5 Advanced Historical Review STOP! Must file an Environmental Evaluation Application. No further environmental review is required. The project is categorically exempt under CEQA. Planner Name: Project Approval Action: Signature: If Discretionary Review before the Planning Commission is requested, the Discretionary Review hearing is the Approval Action for the project. Once signed or stamped and dated, this document constitutes a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and Chapter 31 of the Administrative Code. In accordance with Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code, an appeal of an exemption determination can only be filed within 30 days of the project receiving the first approval action. 4 Revised: 4/11/16

33 STEP 7: MODIFICATION OF A CEQA EXEMPT PROJECT TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER In accordance with Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code, when a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exempt project changes after the Approval Action and requires a subsequent approval, the Environmental Review Officer (or his or her designee) must determine whether the proposed change constitutes a substantial modification of that project. This checklist shall be used to determine whether the proposed changes to the approved project would constitute a substantial modification and, therefore, be subject to additional environmental review pursuant to CEQA. PROPERTY INFORMATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Address (If different than front page) Block/Lot(s) (If different than front page) Case No. Previous Building Permit No. New Building Permit No. Plans Dated Previous Approval Action New Approval Action Modified Project Description: DETERMINATION IF PROJECT CONSTITUTES SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION Compared to the approved project, would the modified project: Result in expansion of the building envelope, as defined in the Planning Code; Result in the change of use that would require public notice under Planning Code Sections 311 or 312; Result in demolition as defined under Planning Code Section 317 or 19005(f)? Is any information being presented that was not known and could not have been known at the time of the original determination, that shows the originally approved project may no longer qualify for the exemption? If at least one of the above boxes is checked, further environmental review is required. DETERMINATION OF NO SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION The proposed modification would not result in any of the above changes. If this box is checked, the proposed modifications are categorically exempt under CEQA, in accordance with prior project approval and no additional environmental review is required. This determination shall be posted on the Planning Department website and office and mailed to the applicant, City approving entities, and anyone requesting written notice. Planner Name: Signature or Stamp: 5 Revised: 4/11/16

34 This page intentionally blank.

35 Flores, Veronica (CPC) From: Sent: To: Subject: Flores, Veronica (CPC) Tuesday, March 08, :43 AM Re: 399 San Fernando Way Hello Mr. Bernstein, This note is in response to your BBN request for the subject property. I am currently reviewing BPA # and Conditional Use Authorization Case # CUA. The applicant proposes to legalize an existing child care facility (d.b.a. YMCA) serving more than 30 children. The child care facility has been around since The project does not seek to physically expand the building, but would include window replacements at the front façade facing onto Ocean Avenue. Historic preservation staff is requiring the wood windows with the same mullions, true divided lites, and ogee lugs as the existing windows. The child care facility would operate Monday through Friday, between the hours of 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. No public hearing date has been set yet. Please confirm receipt of message and meeting BBN request, and let me know if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, Veronica Flores Planner, Current Planning Planning Department, City and County of San Francisco 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA Direct: Fax: Veronica.Flores@sfgov.org Web: 1

36 This page intentionally blank.

37 CASE NUMBER: For Staff Use only Application for Conditional Use APPLICATION FOR Conditional Use Authorization 1. Owner/Applicant Information PROPERTY OWNER S NAME: PROPERTY OWNER S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: APPLICANT S NAME: APPLICANT S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: Same as Above CONTACT FOR PROJECT INFORMATION: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: Same as Above COMMUNITY LIAISON FOR PROJECT (PLEASE REPORT CHANGES TO THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR): ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: Same as Above 2. Location and Classification STREET ADDRESS OF PROJECT: ZIP CODE: CROSS STREETS: ASSESSORS BLOCK/LOT: LOT DIMENSIONS: LOT AREA (SQ FT): ZONING DISTRICT: HEIGHT/BULK DISTRICT: / 7

38 3. Project Description ( Please check all that apply ) Change of Use Change of Hours New Construction Alterations Demolition Other Please clarify: ADDITIONS TO BUILDING: Rear Front Height Side Yard PRESENT OR PREVIOUS USE: PROPOSED USE: BUILDING APPLICATION PERMIT NO.: DATE FILED: 4. Project Summary Table EXISTING USES: EXISTING USES TO BE RETAINED: NET NEW CONSTRUCTION AND/OR ADDITION: PROJECT TOTALS: PROJECT FEATURES Dwelling Units Hotel Rooms Parking Spaces Loading Spaces Number of Buildings Height of Building(s) Number of Stories Bicycle Spaces GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE (GSF) Residential Retail Office Industrial/PDR Production, Distribution, & Repair Parking Other (Specify Use) TOTAL GSF Please describe any additional project features that are not included in this table: ( Attach a separate sheet if more space is needed ) 8 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V

39 CASE NUMBER: For Staff Use only Application for Conditional Use 5. Action(s) Requested (Include Planning Code Section which authorizes action) Conditional Use Findings 9

40 Priority General Plan Policies Findings 1. That existing neighborhood-serving retail uses be preserved and enhanced and future opportunities for resident employment in and ownership of such businesses enhanced; 2. That existing housing and neighborhood character be conserved and protected in order to preserve the cultural and economic diversity of our neighborhoods; 3. That the City s supply of affordable housing be preserved and enhanced; 4. That commuter traffic not impede Muni transit service or overburden our streets or neighborhood parking; 10 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V

41 CASE NUMBER: For Staff Use only Application for Conditional Use 5. That a diverse economic base be maintained by protecting our industrial and service sectors from displacement due to commercial office development, and that future opportunities for resident employment and ownership in these sectors be enhanced; 6. That the City achieve the greatest possible preparedness to protect against injury and loss of life in an earthquake; 7. That landmarks and historic buildings be preserved; and 8. That our parks and open space and their access to sunlight and vistas be protected from development. 11

42 Estimated Construction Costs TYPE OF APPLICATION: OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: BUILDING TYPE: TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET OF CONSTRUCTION: BY PROPOSED USES: ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: ESTIMATE PREPARED BY: FEE ESTABLISHED: Applicant s Affidavit Owner / Authorized Agent (circle one) 12 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V

43 Application for Conditional Use CASE NUMBER: For Staff Use only Application Submittal Checklist APPLICATION MATERIALS Application, with all blanks completed 300-foot radius map, if applicable Address labels (original), if applicable Address labels (copy of the above), if applicable Site Plan Floor Plan Elevations Section 303 Requirements Prop. M Findings Historic photographs (if possible), and current photographs Check payable to Planning Dept. Original Application signed by owner or agent Letter of authorization for agent Other: Section Plan, Detail drawings (ie. windows, door entries, trim), Specifications (for cleaning, repair, etc.) and/or Product cut sheets for new elements (ie. windows, doors) CHECKLIST NOTES: Required Material. Write N/A if you believe the item is not applicable, (e.g. letter of authorization is not required if application is signed by property owner.) Typically would not apply. Nevertheless, in a specific case, staff may require the item. Two sets of original labels and one copy of addresses of adjacent property owners and owners of property across street. application including associated photos and drawings. For Department Use Only 13

44 July 14, 2015 Department of City Planning Department of Building Inspection City &County of San Francisco 1660 Mission Street San Francisco, CA Re: Applications for Co~difional Use Permit YMCA Preschool at St. Francis' Episcopal Church 399 San Fernando Way, San Francisco, CA Department of Building Inspection: The undersigned hereby certifies that Chris Dorman of Dorman Associates is authorized to represent the St. Francis' Episcopal Church in communications with the Department of City Planning and the Department of Building Inspection, including submission of permit applications and related correspondence for the above reference project. Sincerely, ~~ The Rev. Beth erman Rector, St. Francis' THE REV. BETH SNERMAN, RECTOR 399 SAN FERNANDO WAY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Tee. (4i 5) F,aac (4i 5)

45 APPLICATION PACKET FOR School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Plan Planning Department 1650 Mission Street Suite 400 San Francisco, CA T: F: WHAT IS A SCHOOL DROP-OFF & PICK-UP MANAGEMENT PLAN? The School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Plan provides information regarding the circulation of proposed school or day care projects. WHEN IS A SCHOOL DROP-OFF & PICK-UP MANAGEMENT PLAN NECESSARY? Projects subject to CEQA are those actions that require a discretionary decision by one or more public agencies, have the potential to result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and fall within the definition of a project as defined by the CEQA Guidelines Section If the project involves a new or expanded school or daycare facility, the project sponsor may be asked to submit a School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Plan with an Environmental Evaluation Application prior to project approval. HOW DOES THE PROCESS WORK? The project sponsor should consult with their assigned Current Planner or Environmental Planning s Intake Planner Jeanie Poling to determine if a School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Plan is required for environmental review. The School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Plan should be submitted with an Environmental Evaluation Application. WHAT TO INCLUDE ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS Project drawing submitted with the School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Plan must be in 11x17 format and include all information requested in the Environmental Evaluation Application, with additional information relevant to school circulation, such as driveways, off-street parking, bicycle parking, and loading; vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian access to the site; bus stops near the site (within 150 feet); sidewalk widths; and curbside loading (white zones) where queuing would occur. Plans should highlight existing conditions and proposed project-related changes to or near the site. ADDITIONAL STUDIES THAT MAY BE NEEDED The project sponsor may be required by Planning Department staff to provide supplemental data or studies to determine if there are any potential transportation-related impacts resulting from the proposed project. HOW TO SUBMIT THE APPLICATION A completed School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Plan should be submitted with the Environmental Evaluation Application to the attention of Jeanie Poling. Jeanie Poling (415) jeanie.poling@sfgov.org 1 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V (EP)

46 2 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V (EP) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

47 APPLICATION FOR School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Plan 1. Project Summary Table If you are not sure of the eventual size of the project, provide the maximum estimates. PROJECT FEATURES EXISTING PROPOSED MAXIUMUM AT BUILD OUT PROJECT TOTALS: Number of Students Number of Staff Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces on the Project Site Number/Length of Off-Street Loading Spaces on the Project Site Number of Bicycle Parking Spaces on the Project Site Number/Length of On-Street Passenger Loading Zones Adjacent to the Project Site 2. School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Project Information 1. Would the project be implemented in phases? YES NO If yes, please describe the number of phases and duration of each implementation phase. Would the school be in operation during any proposed construction phase? 2. Number of students to be dropped off in the a.m. 3. When would students get dropped off in the a.m.? 4. Would there be a staggered a.m. drop-off? YES NO If yes, please describe how this would work. Would there be windows, for example: 8:00-8:15 a.m.? What grades or age groups would be served during each window? How many cars or children during each window? 3 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V (EP)

48 5. Number of students to be picked up in the p.m. 6. When would the students get picked up in the p.m.? 7. Would there be a staggered p.m. pick-up? If yes, please describe how this would work. Are there windows, for example: 3:00-3:15 p.m.? What grades or age groups would be served during each window? How many cars or children during each window? YES NO 8. Would there be after school activities and programs? If yes, please describe these activities and programs and the pick-up times. YES NO 9. Would there be assigned staff, parents, or others (e.g. students) to help with drop-off and pick-up? YES NO If yes, please describe how many assigned staff, parents, or others and how this would work. 10. Describe any existing and proposed new curb white zones (including lengths) where queueing would occur. Include documation of coorindation with SFMTA and show white zones on plans. 4 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V (EP)

49 11. When would freight/delivery activities occur? Please describe. 12. Would there be staff and/or visitor parking? YES NO If yes, please describe how many spaces for staff and visitors and where the parking would be located. (Show parking on plans). 13. What other transportation-related measures would the school take to ensure the safety of children, families, and staff to the site? For example, a crossing-guard at adjacent crosswalks, or distribution of a pedestrian and bicycle safety fact sheet to parents and children? Please describe. 14. What transportation-related measures would the school take? Please check ALL boxes that apply. Notification to Parents of School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Enforcement Program by School Staff of School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Inventory Log of Transportation-Related Complaints Distribution of Monitoring Reports of the School Drop-Off & Pick-Up Management Distribution of Multimodal Access Guide to the School Bike Racks and Bike Storage Coordinated Walking or Biking Program (Example: Walking School Bus Program) Volunteer Carpooling Program Shared Parking Agreements with Nearby Parking Facilities Commuter Benefit Program for Staff Other. Please describe below additional transportation-related measures that the school would take to encourage the use of transportation modes other than the automobile that are not included above. 5 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V (EP)

50 Applicant s Affidavit Under penalty of perjury the following declarations are made: a: The undersigned is the owner or authorized agent of the owner of this property. b: The information presented is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. c: Other information or applications may be required. Signature: Date: Print name, and indicate whether owner, or authorized agent: Owner / Authorized Agent (circle one) For Department Use Only Application received by Planning Department: By: Date: FOR MORE INFORMATION: Call or visit the San Francisco Planning Department Central Reception 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco CA TEL: FAX: WEB: Planning Information Center (PIC) 1660 Mission Street, First Floor San Francisco CA TEL: Planning staff are available by phone and at the PIC counter. No appointment is necessary. 6 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT V (EP)

51 APPLICATION PACKET FOR School Drop- Off & Pick- Up Management Plan 1. Project Summary Table If you are not sure of the eventual size of the project, provide the maximum estimates. PROJECT FEATURES EXISTING PROPOSED MAXIUMUM AT BUILD OUT PROJECT TOTALS: Number of Students 36 Number of Staff 6 Number of Off- Street Parking Spaces on the Project Site 0 Number/Length of Off- Street Loading 0 Spaces on the Project Site Number of Bicycle Parking Spaces on 0 the Project Site Number/Length of On- Street Passenger Loading Zones Adjacent to the Project Site 150 Lin. Ft. 2. School Drop- Off & Pick- Up Management Project Information 1. Would the project be implemented in phases? If yes, please describe the number of phases and duration of each implementation phase. Would the school be in operation during any proposed construction phase? NO 2. Number of students to be dropped off in the a.m When would students get dropped off in the a.m.? Between 8 and 9: Would there be a staggered a.m. drop- off? If yes, please describe how this would work. Would there be windows, for example: 8:00-8:15 a.m.? What grades or age groups would be served during each window? How many cars or children during each window? YES - typically there are about 4-8 children dropped off within 15 minute increments. The Parents typically park and walk their children in which takes roughly minutes. 5. Number of students to be picked up in the p.m When would the students get picked up in the p.m.? Between 4:30 and 6pm. 7. Would there be a staggered p.m. pick- up? If yes, please describe how this would work. Are there windows, for example: 3:00-3:15 p.m.? What grades or age groups would be served during each window? How many cars or children during each window? YES - typically there are about 4-8 children picked up within 15 minute increments. The Parents typically park and walk in to collect their children in which takes roughly minutes. 8. Would there be after school activities and programs? If yes, please describe these activities and programs and the pick- up times.

52 NO 9. Would there be assigned staff, parents, or others (e.g. students) to help with drop- off and pick- up? If yes, please describe how many assigned staff, parents, or others and how this would work. NO parents have to sign their children in and out of our care in order for the child to leave. The school cannot escort children outside. 10. Describe any existing and proposed new curb white zones (including lengths) where queueing would occur. Include documation of coorindation with SFMTA and show white zones on plans. There is 150 lineal feet of white passenger loading only curb along San Fernando in front of the church and preschool. There is also 4 public parking spaces on Ocean St. directly in front of the church. 11. When would freight/delivery activities occur? Please describe. Church hosts a food bank every Wednesday from 3:30-4:30. Delivery truck occupies white zone for 30 minutes to unload supplies. 12. Would there be staff and/or visitor parking? If yes, please describe how many spaces for staff and visitors and where the parking would be located. (Show parking on plans). NO - There are no spaces designated for staff or visitors- only members (families) of the preschool program. There are two traffic cones with signs alerting others that those spaces are reserved for the preschool along the white zone in front of the church. 13. What other transportation- related measures would the school take to ensure the safety of children, families, and staff to the site? For example, a crossing- guard at adjacent crosswalks, or distribution of a pedestrian and bicycle safety fact sheet to parents and children? Please describe. 14. What transportation- related measures would the school take? Please check ALL boxes that apply. Yes Yes Yes Notification to Parents of School Drop- Off & Pick- Up Management Enforcement Program by School Staff of School Drop- Off & Pick- Up Management Inventory Log of Transportation- Related Complaints Distribution of Monitoring Reports of the School Drop- Off & Pick- Up Management Distribution of Multimodal Access Guide to the School Bike Racks and Bike Storage Coordinated Walking or Biking Program (Example: Walking School Bus Program) Volunteer Carpooling Program Shared Parking Agreements with Nearby Parking Facilities Commuter Benefit Program for Staff Other. Please describe below additional transportation- related measures that the school would take to encourage the use of transportation modes other than the automobile that are not included above. Applicant s Affidavit Under penalty of perjury the following declarations are made: a: The undersigned is the owner or authorized agent of the owner of this property. b: The information presented is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. c: Other information or applications may be required.

53 Signature: Date: 09/20/15 Print name, and indicate whether owner, or authorized agent: Owner / Authorized Agent (circle one) For Department Use Only Application received by Planning Department: By: Date: FOR MORE INFORMATION: Call or visit the San Francisco Planning Department Central Reception 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco CA TEL: FAX: WEB: Planning Information Center (PIC) 1660 Mission Street, First Floor San Francisco CA TEL: Planning staff are available by phone and at the PIC counter. No appointment is necessary.

54 This page intentionally blank.

55

56 S P E C I F I C AT I O N S EcoPark #CS-EP-SM-M02, 2-bike capacity s &REESTANDING OR LINKABLE IN ROWS bike capacity units s #ONTOURED ROOF TO ELIMINATE WATER BUILD up s #ONCEALED CONTINUOUS HINGE hi-strength attachment to molded bosses 6 5-1/2 (1968.5mm) length 2 9 s 3HIPPED IN KIT FORM FOR REDUCED FREIGHT available preassembled upon request (838.2mm) width 399 SAN FERNANDO WAY Available in single door 1/2 bike capacity, or two door 2-bike capacity Space efficient footprint; 9 sq. ft./2-door unit LOWER FLOOR AREA: 4,140 S.F. TOTAL AREA: 16,480 S.F. TOTAL PRESCHOOL 1,992 S.F. FLOOR AREA: ED ARCH I NS CT TE SAN FERNANDO WAY GROSS LOT AREA: 24,746 S.F. MAIN FLOOR AREA: 12,340 S.F. CHRIS DORMAN SCOPE OF WORK: RECORD DOCUMENTS FOR EXISTING PRESCHOOL, REPLACE (3) WINDOWS, ADD BIKE STORAGE LOCKER Typical Typical C AT EcoPark #CS-EP-SM-M02 2-door, 2 bike capacity Door opening 29 wide x 44 high ARCHITECT: DORMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. CHRIS DORMAN, AIA 234 SHORELINE HWY MILL VALLEY, CA P: F: CD@DORMANASSOCIATES.COM ZONING: RH-1(D) ST Interlocking door flange resists destructive entry 50-1/2 O.A.H. Door Opening 29 wide x 44 high OWNER: THE PARISH OF SAINT FRANCIS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 399 SAN FERNANDO WAY SAN FRANCISCO, CA P: ADDRESS: 399 SAN FERNANDO WAY SAN FRANCISCO, CA APN: CHRIS DORMAN, AIA 234 SHORELINE HWY MILL VALLEY, CA FAX IA CLIENT: YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO CONTACT: BILL WORTHINGTON 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 650 SAN FRANCISCO, CA P:(415) s 2EINFORCED STEEL COATED END PANELS See Door Lock Options PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT DIRECTORY E RN (1277.9mm) height L IC E s (OT #OMPRESSION $OOR 2OOF construction molded w/1,000 ton press for structural steel strength and hi-impact resistance 4 2-1/4 OF F CA L I O 77-1/2 ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS Capacity: Holds 1 Bike or 2 Bikes Material: High Density Polyester SMC (Sheet Molding Compound). Zinc Primed TGIC Powder Coat End Panels 16 gauge Reinforced Steel or Options Available. Natural Sandstone Finish Standard Color. Custom RAL Colors Upon Request. 4 A1 A2 A3 COLORS STANDARD DRAWING SITE & MAIN FLOOR LOWER FLOOR PLAN ELEVATIONS Sandstone RAL 1019 CUSTOM Translink Grey RAL 7039 Gibraltor Grey RAL 7047 Burgundy RAL 3007 Signal White RAL 9003 Saphire Blue RAL 5003 Custom RAL upon request 3 SITE CONTEXT 2 VICINITY MAP CYCLE SAFE ECOPARK ALLEY APN: CycleSafe EcoPark: Model # door, 2 Bike unit. Model # door, 1/2 Bike unit. SHEET # M08 - M bike capacity 399 SAN FERNANDO WAY M06 6 bike capacity SAN FRANCISCO, CA M04 4 bike capacity YMCA ST. FRANCIS M02 M01 1 bike capacity 2 bike capacity PERMIT SUBMITTAL PLAY AREA SITE & MAIN FLOOR 1 (N) PARK-IT 2-BIKE RACK SEE A2 1 (N) CYCLESAFE BIKE LOCKERS PER SPEC. ON 4/A1 REVISIONS CHAINLINK FENCE OCEAN AVE. GATE STAIR TO LOWER FLOOR BELOW PRESCHOOL ENTRY BELOW PROPERTY LINE DATE: SAN FERNANDO ST N 1 SITE & MAIN FLOOR PLAN 3/28/16 SHEET A1

57 CHRIS DORMAN, AIA 234 SHORELINE HWY MILL VALLEY, CA FAX CL. CLOSET 4 S.F. ADDITIONAL EXIT THAT IS NOT REQUIRED OFFICE OCC. LOAD: 840 S.F./100 = 8 PERSONS L STAT I CENSED ARCH CHRIS DORMAN E C OF CA L I TECT I A I FORN CRAWL SPACE STORAGE RESTROOM UP CL. NOT AFFILIATED WITH PRESCHOOL DN CL 18 S.F. CL 18 S.F. CL 13 S.F. 5'-2" FE SD FAU/TYP MECH. SD HW FAU/TYP SD SD FE HALL FE SD SD 1,990 S.F. PRESCHOOL 1,992 S.F. AREA SHOWN SHADED REPLACE 3 (E) WD. WINDOWS TO MEET MIN. STC. REQ. PER PLANNING CONDITIONS YMCA ST. FRANCIS 399 SAN FERNANDO WAY SAN FRANCISCO, CA APN: LIGHTWELL Ucab PRESCHOOL CLASSROOM OCC. LOAD: 470 S.F./35 = 13 PERSONS SD SD PRESCHOOL CLASSROOM OCC. LOAD: 630 S.F./35 = 18 PERSONS OCCUPANCY LOAD OF CORRIDOR = 31 PERSONS OFFICE OCC. LOAD: 180 S.F./100 = 1 PERSONS SD PERMIT SUBMITTAL N.W. Corner SD PRESCHOOL RR UP SD FE Exit FA TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF PRESCHOOL: 33 PERSONS +/- 8'-0" OFFICE OCC. LOAD: 170 S.F./100 = 1 PERSONS SD 30" CLR. SECURITY ALARM +/- 5'-6" 12" CLR. SIDEWALK 1 (N) PARK-IT SURFACE MTD. 2-BIKE RACK POWDER COATED BLACK OCEAN AVE. CROSSWALK LOWER FLOOR PLAN REVISIONS LEGEND: SD SMOKE DETECTOR FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER FA FIRE ALARM PULL STATION SAN FERNANDO ST NOTE: 1. EXISTING DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE 2. FIRE ALARM UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 3. NO FIRE SPRINKLER PROVIDED. 4. (E) FACILITY TO REMAIN AS IS PER CODE SECTION , THAT ALLOWS FOR THE CONTINUED USE AS A PRESCHOOL BECAUSE THIS BUILDING COMPLIED WITH THE BUILDING CODE PROVISIONS THAT WERE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION. THE PRESCHOOL HAS BEEN IN USE FOR AT LEAST 18 YEARS AND HAS BEEN LICENSED AND INSPECTED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT DURING THAT TIME. CROSSWALK DATE: 3/28/16 2 ORIGINAL LOWER FLOOR PLAN (EST. 1950) LOWER FLOOR PLAN 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" N SHEET A2

58 T.B.D. T.B.D. T.B.D. T.B.D. CHRIS DORMAN, AIA 234 SHORELINE HWY MILL VALLEY, CA FAX CT TE IA RN C E OF F CA L I O TYP. WINDOW DETAILS REAR ELEVATION REPLACE 3 (E) WD. WINDOWS TO MEET MIN. STC. REQ. PER PLANNING CONDITIONS APN: SAN FERNANDO WAY BUILDING WEST ELEVATION (SAN FERNANDO WAY) SAN FRANCISCO, CA SCALE: 1:2.12 YMCA ST. FRANCIS 6 CHRIS DORMAN AT 1 WINDOW REQUIREMENTS: 1. WOOD SASH WINDOWS TO BE INSTALLED TO MATCH (E) 2. OGEE LUG AT TOP SASH TO MACH (E) CONFIGURATION. 3. WINDOW PANES TO HAVE TRUE DIVIDED-LITES. 4. DOUBLE WINDOWS TO BE MULLED. ED ARCH I NS ST T.B.D. L IC E CD@DORMANASSOCIATES.COM PERMIT SUBMITTAL ELEVATIONS 5 SOUTH ELEVATION (OCEAN AVE.) 2 ELEVATION TO OCEAN AVENUE REVISIONS DATE: 4/1/16 SHEET 4 YMCA WEST ELEVATION (ON SAN FERNANDO WAY) SCALE: 1: FRONT ELEVATION TO SAN FERNANDO WAY A3