APPENDIX A VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE HARVEST TREATMENT SUMMARY TABLES

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "APPENDIX A VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE HARVEST TREATMENT SUMMARY TABLES"

Transcription

1 APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS APPENDIX A VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY This table provides information about the proposed treatment units including the existing conditions, the proposed treatment, the objectives of the proposed treatment, and which part of the purpose and need that the treatment is contributing too. More information about silvicultural prescriptions, habitat types, the insects and diseases affecting forest stands in the project area, and the potential effects of proposed treatments on forest stands can be found in Chapter 3 Forest Vegetation section. Information about Management Areas can be found in Chapter 2, and detailed descriptions of the purpose and needs for the project can be found in Chapter 1. ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE HARVEST TREATMENT SUMMARY TABLES PLANT SPECIES: AF= subalpine fir; DF = Douglas-fir; ES = Engelmann spruce; GF = grand fir; LP = lodgepole pine; MH = mountain hemlock; PB = paper birch; PP = ponderosa pine; RC = red cedar; WbP = whitebark pine; WL = western larch; WP = white pine; CW = cottonwood RESOURCE PROTECTION MEASURES: HOAQ buffer = 300 foot buffer around occupied and unoccupied water howellia habitat; RHCA buffer = riparian habitat conservation areas, buffers can range between feet (see Chapter 3 Aquatics report for more information). INSECT & DISEASE: DFB = Douglas-fir beetle; MPB = mountain pine beetle; DMT = dwarf mistletoe; RR= root rot; WGR = western gall rust; WPBR = white pine blister rust; WSBW = western spruce bud worm; SPM = sequoia pitch moth LOGGING METHOD AND SLASH TREATMENT: W = Wildland Urban Interface Recommendations from the Seeley-Swan Community Wildfire Protection Plan to reduce fuels near and adjacent to private land and residences within the WUI. Reducing stocking in forest stands within the WUI and along strategic fuel breaks, where modeling shows flame lengths greater than 4 feet in order to protect private property and provide for firefighter safety. PURPOSE AND NEED FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT SE = Stem Exclusion Protecting and creating lynx habitat by treating stem exclusion stands to recruit dense patches of understory vegetation. QA = Aspen Designing management activities, such as planting or burning, to increase aspen presence on appropriate sites. WTY = whole tree yarding Sh = Shrubs PURPOSE & NEED REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARACTERISTIC WILDFIRE BB = Broadcast Burn Designing management activities, such as regeneration harvests or burning, to increase shrub and huckleberry production. Using fire for ecological restoration and to modify fire behavior. Appendix A-1

2 APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS PURPOSE AND NEED FOREST HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE M = Stand Modification Reducing stocking in stands where densities are high to promote tree vigor, alter species composition, and reduce susceptibility of loss due to insect attack and disease. Modifying stand structure to reduce risk of loss to white pine blister rust and mountain pine beetle. Reducing densities and promoting diversity in young stands that are regenerating after past regeneration harvests. R = Regeneration/Replacement of Stand Replacing (regenerating) stands heavily affected by current and past mountain pine beetle infestations with fire-adapted early-seral species. Replacing (regenerating) stands heavily infested with and badly degraded by root disease using species resistant to the extant disease. LT = Enhance/Protect Large Tree Component Reducing understory ingrowth in stands containing large, healthy legacy trees, especially western larch and to a lesser extent, ponderosa pine. Maintaining large legacy trees where they occur on the landscape. Promoting structure and composition of stands containing old trees to place them on a better trajectory toward old growth conditions characteristic of the forest type, taking into account the contribution of the stand to landscape fire adaptation and watershed health. WbP\WP = Enhance/Protect/Establish Whitebark Pine/Western white pine Restoring health and vigor of western white pine and whitebark pine through strict stocking control ( daylighting ); re-establishing both species on suitable sites using rust-resistant planting stock. Create nutcracker openings of 1 to 5 acres and even up to 30 acres to mimic patchy, mixed-severity fires, which are favored by nutcrackers to cache whitebark pine seeds. PURPOSE AND NEED BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY B = Biomass Opportunity Utilizing woody biomass and small-diameter trees produced from the project. C = Convertible Products Capturing the value of convertible products resulting from forest health and fuels treatments, especially those declining in value due to forest health issues. SCO = Service Contracting Opportunities Providing local employment or training opportunities through contracts, grants, or agreements. Utilizing local contractors to support economic sustainability. Appendix A-2

3 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Mixed-conifer DF, WL, ES, LP, PP, AF. Large-diameter WL, PP, DF with dense understory/ladder fuels. MPB and WSBW. WUI. Mixed-conifer DF, WL, ES, LP, PP, AF. Large-diameter WL, PP, DF with dense understory/ladder fuels. MPB and WSBW. WUI. Mixed-conifer DF, WL, LP, PP. Large-diameter WL, PP, DF with patches of dense understory/ladder fuels. WSBW. WUI. Younger stand of mixed-conifer LP, PP, WL, DF, AF with shadetolerant species coming in beneath. Large-diameter WL in northeast portion of unit. Active MPB in LP. WGR and SPM infecting LP. WUI. Two-storied stand of mixedconifer LP, DF, WL, AF with shade-tolerant species coming in beneath. Old MPB and WGR in LP. WSBW impacting understory. Dense understory/ladder fuels in places. WUI. Plantation dominated by PP and LP with DF and WL 4-9 inches DBH. DF coming in underneath. MPB active WUI. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large-diameter PP, WL, and DF and thinning throughout stand. WTY and mechanical slashing. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large-diameter PP, WL, and DF and thinning throughout stand. WTY and mechanical slashing. Broadcast burn. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large-diameter PP, WL, and DF and thinning throughout stand. WTY and mechanical slashing. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large-diameter WL and thinning throughout stand. WTY, pile and mechanical slashing. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. WTY. Broadcast burn. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. Mechanical slash treatment. Thin to reduce stocking to overall stand, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Thin to reduce stocking to overall stand, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load, and promote shrub and huckleberry production. Thin to reduce stocking to overall stand, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Maintain large tree component.thin to reduce stocking to improve health and vigor of overall stand, making stand more resilient to MPB, promote PP and WL, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Thin to reduce stocking to overall stand, promote DF and WL, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load, and promote shrub and huckleberry production. overall stand, making stand more resilient to MPB, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY W SE LT, M C BB, W QA,Sh LT, M C W SE LT, M C W SE LT, M B, C BB, W QA,Sh M C W M B, SCO Appendix A-3

4 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C, 15C C C EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Mixed-conifer unit. East dominated by LP with WL. LP has MPB, WGR. Low fuel loading. West dominated by WL, ES, LP. Large tree component of WL. LP in decline. MPB. Heavy fuel loading. WUI. Mixed-conifer unit DF, ES, WL dominate with LP. Dense portions experiencing mortality due to competition and MPB. Schweinitzii root rot also present. Fuel loadings vary from low to high. WUI. Mixed-conifer PP, DF, WL, LP with ES, AF. MPB mortality in PP, LP. Root rot and DFB infecting DF. Moderate to heavy fuel loading. WUI. Mixed-conifer LP, WL, DF, and PP. MPB, WGR, DMT, and SPM affecting LP causing mortality throughout heavy in places. Fuel loading is, therefore, variable low to heavy. WUI. Mixed-conifer dominated by LP and WL, with AF and some PP. MPB in LP. Moderate fuel loading. WUI. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. WTY and mechanical slashing. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large tree component - PP and thinning throughout stand. WTY, pile and mechanical slashing. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. WTY, pile and mechanical slashing. Broadcast burn Seed tree with reserves via groundbased, mechanized equipment. WTY. Plant PP, WL, and WPBR resistant WP. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. WTY and mechanical slashing. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB, salvage declining LP, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall unit, making it more resilient to MPB, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB, DFB and root rot, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load, and promote shrub and huckleberry production. Initiate regeneration to improve overall health and vigor, and reestablish PP, WL, and WPBR resistant WP. Reduce fuel load, and promote shrub and huckleberry production. Maintain large-diameter WL, PP, and DF to provide for structural diversity. Thin to reduce stocking to overall stand, making stand more resilient to MPB, promote PP and WL, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY W SE LT, M B, C W SE LT, M C BB, W QA, Sh LT, M C W Sh LT, M, R, WP C, SCO W SE M C Appendix A-4

5 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C C C C 10 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Stand dominated by LP and WL with DF. Large-diameter WL and PP present. MPB killing LP. Patches of dense DF understory/ladder fuels. Moderate fuel loading. WUI. LP dominated stand with WL, DF, PP. MPB attacking LP, PP. LP also has WGR, SPM. Southeast portion more variable with addition of ES and large tree component of PP, WL, DF. DFB and RR pockets. Patches of MPB killed trees falling down. WUI. Mixed-conifer stand of WL, DF, LP ES, and PP. MPB killing LP. Few large-diameter PP, WL, DF. Moderate fuel loading. WUI. Mixed-conifer stand dominated by LP with WL, DF, ES. Largediameter WL and PP present. DF in understory. MPB killing LP. Moderate fuel loading. WUI. Heavily stocked young stand of predominantly LP with a few large-diameter WL. MPB in LP. Low to moderate fuel loading. WUI. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large tree component PP and WL. Thinning throughout stand. WTY, pile and broadcast burn. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large tree component PP and WL. Thinning throughout stand. WTY, pile and mechanical slashing. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large tree component PP, WL, DF. Thinning throughout stand. WTY and mechanical slashing. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large tree component PP, WL. Thinning throughout stand. WTY and mechanical slashing. Combination of commercial and precommercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large tree component WL. Thinning throughout stand. WTY and mechanical slashing. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB, salvage declining LP, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load, and promote shrub and huckleberry production. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB, DFB, RR, reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY BB, W QA, Sh LT, M C W SE LT, M C W SE LT, M C W SE LT, M C W LT, M C Appendix A-5

6 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C C C C C 35 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Mixed-conifer stand dominated by LP, WL, DF with AF. Largediameter WL, PP. MPB and DMT in LP. Some heavily infested DMT WL. Moderate fuel loading. WUI. Mixed-conifer of WL, LP, and DF beneath a few large-diameter PP. Few QA, CW. WUI Predominantly WL, LP with DF, ES. Few large-diameter WL. MPB in LP. Moderate fuel loading. WUI. Mixed-conifer stand with WL, LP, DF with AF, DF coming in below. Few large-diameter WL, DF. MPB in LP. Moderate fuel loading. WUI. Two storied stand of predominantly DF with WL, PP and DF seedling/saplings in openings. Moderate fuel loading. WUI. Mixed-conifer dominated by DF with WL, LP, ES. WGR in LP. RR affecting patches of DF. Patches of dense regeneration of DF, AF, DF, LP, WL, GF, PP. Low fuel loading. WUI. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large tree component PP, WL. Thinning throughout stand. WTY and mechanical slashing. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large tree component PP. Thinning throughout stand. WTY and broadcast burn. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large tree component WL. Thinning throughout stand. WTY. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large tree component DF, WL. Thinning throughout stand. WTY, pile and broadcast burn Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, Thinning throughout stand. WTY, broadcast burn Combination of commercial and precommercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. WTY, pile mechanical slashing. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB and DMT. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load, promote QA, shrub and huckleberry production. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load, promote QA, shrub and huckleberry production. overall stand, Favor WL, PP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load, promote QA, shrub and huckleberry production. overall stand, Favor WL, PP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY W LT, M C BB, W QA, Sh LT, M C W SE LT, M C BB, W QA, Sh LT, M C BB, W QA, Sh M C W SE M B, C Appendix A-6

7 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C C C C 3 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Decadent LP with few scattered large-diameter WL. LP has MPB, WGR, DMT and starting to fall down. High fuel loading. WUI. Mixed-conifer dominated by LP, with WL, DF, AF, ES, Scattered MPB, WGR, SPM in LP. WSBW attacking firs. Fuel loading variable. WUI. Mixed-conifer LP, WL, DF, AF, ES. Stand previously cut with patches of regen coming in. Few large-diameter WL. Fuel loading moderate to very high. WUI. Mixed-conifer dominated by LP, with WL. Shade-tolerant species establishing. Combination of old and new scattered MPB in LP. Few large-diameter WL. Fuel loading low to moderate. WUI. Mixed-conifer dominated by LP and WL with DF and ES. Shadetolerant species establishing underneath. Combination of old and new scattered MPB in LP. Fuel loading high. Adjacent to private property. WUI. Clearcut with reserves via groundbased, mechanized equipment, retaining WL and best LP. WTY, pile. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, Commercial and noncommercial thinning throughout stand. WTY. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, Commercial and pre-commercial thinning throughout stand. WTY/mechanical. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, daylighting around large tree component WL. Thinning throughout stand. WTY, pile. Seed tree with reserves via groundbased, mechanized equipment. WTY. Plant PP, WL, and WPBR resistant WP. Initiate regeneration to improve overall health and vigor, and reestablish WL, WP, PP. Maintain large-diameter WL and best phenotypic LP to provide for structural diversity. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL, DF for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL, DF for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Initiate regeneration to improve overall health and vigor, and reestablish PP, WL, and WPBR resistant WP. Reduce fuel load, and promote shrub and huckleberry production. Maintain larger diameter WL to provide for structural diversity. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY W Sh R, WP C, SCO W SE M B, C W SE LT, M B, C W SE LT, M C W Sh R, WP C, SCO Appendix A-7

8 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Two-storied stand of predominantly LP with WL and ES. Understory of ES, AF, and GF. Old to recent MPB in LP. Fuel loading moderate. WUI. Mixed-conifer dominated by LP and WL with DF and some PP and ES. Few large-diameter WL. Combination of old and new scattered MPB and Atropellis canker in LP. Fuel loading moderate to high. Adjacent to private property. WUI. Dense LP susceptible to MPB. Low to medium fuel loading. WUI. Mixed-conifer of WL, LP, and DF. LP is dense with small crown ratios. Old MPB. Low to medium fuel loading. WUI Declining LP stand with some DF, AF, and WL. Fuel load is moderate to high. WUI Variable stand. Dense areas dominated by LP with WL, DF, AF, and DF. Other areas of sparser overstory of WL, DF, and AF with WL, DF, AF, and LP coming in below. DMT in some WL and DF. Low fuel loading. WUI. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. WTY. Seed tree with reserves via groundbased, mechanized equipment. WTY. Plant PP, WL, and WPBR resistant WP. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. WTY. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. WTY. Combination of commercial and precommercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. WTY, mechanical, BB. Combination of commercial and precommercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. Mechanical slash treatment. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Initiate regeneration to improve overall health and vigor, and reestablish PP, WL, and WPBR resistant WP. Reduce fuel load, and promote shrub and huckleberry production. Maintain large-diameter WL to provide for structural diversity. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Reduce fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Reduce fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL. Reduce fuel load. overall stand, removing DMT DF and WL and making it more resilient to MPB. Favor healthy WL and DF. Reduce fuel load. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY W SE M C W Sh LT, R C W SE M C W M C BB, W QA, Sh M C W SE M B, C, SCO Appendix A-8

9 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C C 41 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Mixed-conifer stand dominated by DF and LP with WL and AF. MPB attacking LP. Medium to high fuel load. WUI. Dominated by DF with LP, WL, and GF, stand is on steep slope facing Lindbergh Lake. MPB in LP, WSBW affecting foliage of DF and true fir, RR evident on south end of unit. Fuel loading is medium to high. WUI. LP dominated with WL and DF. Shade-tolerant species coming in beneath. DMT in both LP and WL. Fuel loading high. WUI. Jocko Trail along west boundary. Variable unit of dense LP, DF, and WL to more open WL regen beneath scattered WL, DF and AF seed trees. DMT in some overstory WL. WSBW affecting understory. Moderate to high fuel loading. WUI. Patchy unit of WL, LP, and AF with dense regeneration of WL and LP within the holes. DMT in some overstory WL. WSBW affecting understory. Moderate to high fuel loading. WUI. Predominantly LP with scattered WL. Shade-tolerant species coming beneath. Few largediameter WL. Some DMT in WL, MPB has killed some LP. Fuel load is low to moderate. WUI. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. WTY, mechanical. Commercial thin via skyline equipment, thinning throughout unit. WTY, pile. Clearcut with reserves via groundbased, mechanized equipment. Slash cleanup mechanical, pile. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, commercial and pre-commercial thinning throughout stand. WTY/mechanical. Commercial and pre-commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout stand. WTY/mechanical. Seed tree with reserves via groundbased, mechanized equipment. WTY. Plant PP, WL, and WPBRresistant WP. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL and DF. Reduce fuel load. reduce the chance of a crown fire and provide opportunity to restrict the growth of fire moving north towards homes on private land. Favor WL which is more fire and RR resistant. Reduce fuel load. Regenerate stand with DMT-free WL as reserve trees and plant long-lived seral species WL and WP to create a two-aged stand. overall stand, and making it more resilient to MPB. Favor DMT-free WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels. overall stand, and making it more resilient to MPB. Favor DMT-free WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels. Initiate regeneration to improve overall health and vigor, and reestablish PP, WL, and WPBRresistant WP. Reduce fuel load, and promote shrub and huckleberry production. Maintain large-diameter WL to provide for structural diversity. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY W SE M C W SE LT, M C W Sh R, WP C, SCO W SE M B, C W M B, C W Sh LT, R, WP C, SCO Appendix A-9

10 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT. 2 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY 90 11C C C C C 1 Mixed-conifer stand dominated by DF, LP and WL with shadetolerant species coming in from below. Few large-diameter WL and PP. Some DMT in DF and WL. Low fuel load on the ground, but ladder fuels present. Mixed-conifer stand dominated by DF, LP and WL with shadetolerant species coming in from below. Few large-diameter WL. Some DMT in DF and WL. Low fuel load on the ground, but ladder fuels present. Stagnating LP with WL and DF. Few large-diameter WL. Fuel loading is high. Stagnating LP with WL and DF. Few large-diameter WL. Fuel loading is high. Stagnating LP with WL and DF. Few large-diameter WL. Fuel loading is high. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout unit. Daylight around large tree component WL and PP. WTY. Commercial thin via skyline equipment, thinning throughout unit. Daylight around large tree component WL. WTY. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, including pre-commercial thinning throughout stand. Daylight around large tree component WL. WTY/pile. Improvement cut via skyline equipment, including pre-commercial thinning throughout stand. Daylight around large tree component WL. WTY/pile. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, including pre-commercial thinning throughout stand. Daylight around large tree component WL. WTY/pile. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. SE LT, M C SE LT, M C SE LT, M B, C SE LT, M C SE LT, M B, C Appendix A-10

11 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT. 2 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY 96 11C C C Mixed-conifer dominated by LP with DF, WL, AF, and PP. Variable stocking. Few largediameter WL. Fuel loading is low to moderate. Mixed-conifer dominated by LP with DF, WL, AF, and PP. Variable stocking. Few largediameter WL. Fuel loading is low to moderate. Mixed-conifer dominated by LP with DF, WL, AF, and PP. Variable stocking. Few largediameter WL. Fuel loading is low to moderate. Mixed-conifer of LP, DF, and WL. Patches of older dead LP from MPB. Some DMT in DF and WL. RR affecting DF. Fuel loading is moderate to high. Mixed-conifer dominated by LP and DF, with WL and AF. Patches of older dead LP from MPB. Some DMT in DF. Few large diameter WL. Fuel loading is moderate to high. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout unit. Daylight around large tree component WL and PP. WTY. Commercial thin via skyline equipment, thinning throughout unit. Daylight around large tree component WL and PP. WTY. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout unit. Daylight around large tree component WL and PP. WTY. Seed tree with reserves via groundbased, mechanized equipment. WTY. Plant PP, WL, and WPBRresistant WP. Seed tree with reserves via skyline equipment. WTY. Plant PP, WL, and WPBR resistant WP. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL, PP, and DF for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL, PP, and DF for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL, PP, and DF for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Initiate regeneration to improve overall health and vigor, and reestablish PP, WL, and WPBR resistant WP. Reduce fuel load, and promote shrub and huckleberry production. Maintain larger diameter WL to provide for structural diversity. Initiate regeneration to improve overall health and vigor, and reestablish PP, WL, and WPBRresistant WP. Reduce fuel load, and promote shrub and huckleberry production. Maintain larger diameter WL to provide for structural diversity. SE LT, M C SE LT, M C SE LT, M C Sh Sh LT, R, WP LT, R, WP C C Appendix A-11

12 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C C 8 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Northern portion is dominated by declining LP that is susceptible to MPB. Few large-diameter WL. Patches of dead LP due to MPB. Southern portion mixed-conifer of LP, DF, and WL. Patches of older dead LP from MPB. Some DMT in DF and WL. RR affecting DF. Fuel loading is moderate to high. Jocko Trail cuts through north end of unit. Mixed-conifer consisting of WL, LP, and DF. Few large-diameter WL. DMT infecting some WL. RR prevalent throughout unit. MPB has killed a good portion of LP. Fuel loading is moderate to high, especially where dead LP has fallen over. Overstocked stand of predominantly DF with scattered WL. Fuel loading is low. Overstocked stand of predominantly DF with scattered WL. Fuel loading is low. Mixed-conifer of predominantly LP with receding live crown ratios and with WL, AF, and DF also present. Few large-diameter WL. Patches of MPB-killed LP. WSBW affecting AF. Fuel loading is low to high. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout unit. Daylight around large tree component WL. WTY/pile. Seed tree with reserves via skyline equipment. WTY/pile. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout unit. WTY. Broadcast Burn. Commercial thin via skyline equipment, thinning throughout unit. WTY. Broadcast Burn. Improvement cut via skyline equipment, thinning throughout stand. Daylight around large tree component WL. WTY. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor healthy WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Initiate regeneration to improve overall health and vigor, and reestablish WL, WP, and PP. Maintain large-diameter DMT-free WL and healthy DF to provide for structural diversity. Promote shrub and huckleberry production. overall stand. Favor WL, for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load, promote shrub and huckleberry production. overall stand. Favor WL, for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load, promote shrub and huckleberry production. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY SE LT, M C Sh LT, R, WP BB QA, Sh M C BB QA, Sh M C SE LT, M, WbP C C Appendix A-12

13 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT. 2 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY C 74 NE and SW ends of unit are dominated by overstocked LP with WL, DF, ES, and AF also present. Patches of MPB-killed LP and WSBW affecting AF. The middle is also dominated by LP with ES and AF and a minor amount of DF. Patches of MPB-killed LP, DMT affecting LP and WSBW affecting AF and DF. There is a large tree component of WL and ES. Fuel loading varies from low to high. Group selection via ground-based mechanical equipment. Approximately 20% of unit will be nutcracker openings. WTY/pile/mechanical. Provide openings for the regeneration of white pine blister rust-resistant WbP. Favor WL and any healthy WbP for retention. Maintain larger diameter WL to provide for structural diversity. Promote shrub and huckleberry production. Sh LT, M, R, WbP B, C C C 17 LP dominated stands with WL, DF, AF, and ES. LP generally have low live crown ratios. There is a large tree component of scattered WL, DF, and ES. WbP regenerating in the understory. Patches of MPB-killed LP. Fuel loading varies from medium to high. Mixed-conifer of LP, AF, DF, WL, and ES. There is a large tree component of scattered WL and DF. LP with low live crown ratios. Patches of MPB-killed LP. WSBW affecting understory DF and AF. Fuel loading moderate. Group selection cut via groundbased mechanical equipment. Approximately 20 percent of unit will be nutcracker openings 1 with the remaining matrix (~80% percent) being thinned. Daylight around large tree component WL, DF, and ES. WTY/pile. Improvement cut via ground-based mechanical equipment, thinning throughout stand. Daylight around large tree component WL. WTY. Provide openings for the regeneration of blister rustresistant WbP. Daylight around older mature WbP and other large-tree component. Reduce stocking density to improve health and vigor of overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor healthy WbP and WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load, promote shrub and huckleberry production. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL and any healthy WbP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Sh SE LT, M, R, WbP LT, M, WbP B, C C 1 Nutcracker openings are a cutting treatment that attempts to mimic patchy, mixed severity wildfires. Appendix A-13

14 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C C C C C 11 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Heavily stocked mixed-conifer stand of DF, WL, and AF with minor amounts of ES and LP. WSBW affecting AF. Low fuel loading. Densely-stocked young AF stand with ES, DF, and WL. Predominantly young LP with young WL and few scattered large WL. MPB has attacked larger LP. Low fuel load. WUI. Predominantly young LP with young WL and PP. Dense stocking. Low fuel load. WUI. Two-storied stand of predominantly young LP with WL, DF, and few PP under seed trees of PP, WL, and DF. WGR on LP. Low fuel load. WUI. Young stand of PP, LP, DF, and WL. MPB mortality in LP. Low fuel load. WUI. Commercial thin via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout unit. WTY. Improvement cut via skyline equipment, including pre-commercial thinning throughout stand. WTY. Pre-commercial thin by hand throughout stand. Daylight around large tree component WL. Lop and scatter slash. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout unit. Mechanical slash treatment. Pre-commercial thin by hand throughout stand. Lop and scatter slash. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, mainly precommercial thinning throughout unit. Mechanical/pile. overall stand. Favor WL, DF, and any healthy WbP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Remove AF in overstory and reduce stocking density to overall stand. Favor WL and DF for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Daylight around large tree component. Favor WL and PP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL and PP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL and PP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL and PP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY SE M, WbP C SE M C W LT, M SCO W M B, SCO W M SCO W SE M B, SCO Appendix A-14

15 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C C C C C 40 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Mixed stand of ES, DF, WL, AF, LP, PP, QA, and CW. Some WGR and MPB affecting LP. Low fuel load. WUI. Dense understory of ES, LP, WL, DF, and AF beneath WL and ES seed trees. Some WGR on LP. Dense ladder fuels. WUI. Understory of DF, WL, LP, ES and PP beneath DF. Fuel load is low. WUI. LP widely scattered over dense regeneration, predominately LP with ES, WL, DF, and AF. WGR in LP. Moderate fuel loading. WUI. Widely-scattered WL and LP (DF and PP minor) over predominately LP, with WL, DF, and ES regeneration. Fuel load is low. WUI. Scattered LP, WL, DF and PP over predominately LP regeneration with DF and AF. WGR on LP. Low fuel load. WUI Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, mainly precommercial thinning throughout unit. Pre-commercial thin by hand throughout stand. Lop and scatter slash. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical/pile. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical/pile. Pre-commercial thin by hand throughout stand. Lop and scatter slash. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical/pile overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor PP, WL, QA, and CW for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load, promote QA. overall stand. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL and PP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL and PP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY W SE, QA M B, SCO W LT, M SCO W M B, SCO W M B, SCO W M SCO W M B, SCO Appendix A-15

16 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C C , 11C C C 24 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Predominately scattered WL with some LP over dense LP, WL, DF, and AF regeneration. WGR on LP. Moderate fuel load. WUI. Widely scattered WL over dense regeneration of predominately LP with WL and AF. WGR and SPM on LP. Low fuel loading. WUI. Scattered WL, PP DF, AF, and ES over dense regeneration of predominately LP with WL, DF, ES, and AF. WGR and SPM on LP. Low fuel loading. WUI. Dense mixed-conifer stand of predominantly ES with DF, WL, and PP over an understory of ES, DF, and AF. Within RHCA. Moderate to heavy fuel load. WUI. Predominately LP in both sparse overstory and dense understory with some WL in both levels. WGR and SPM on LP. Low fuel loading. WUI. Widely scattered WL in overstory, over dense regeneration of predominately LP with WL, and DF. Low fuel loading. WUI. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical/pile. Pre-commercial thin by hand throughout stand. Lop and scatter slash. Stand improvement daylighting (approximately 5 feet wider than crown radius) around large DF, WL and PP (approximately 2/acre) trees by hand. Lop and scatter slash. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical/pile. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, mainly precommercial thinning throughout unit. Mechanical slash treatment. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL and PP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Maintain large tree component of WL, PP and DF. Reduce stocking density around large trees to improve their health and vigor making them less susceptible to insects by changing the microenvironment. Reduce ladder fuels beneath the large trees. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL and DF for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY W M B, SCO W M B, SCO W M SCO W LT, M SCO W M B, SCO W SE LT, M B, SCO Appendix A-16

17 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C C C EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Old PCTC landing with sparse vegetation. Widely scattered WL and LP over predominately LP with WL, DF, and ES. Some DMT in older LP. Low to moderate fuel load. WUI. Widely scattered WL, DF, and LP over predominately LP with WL, PP, DF, AF, and ES. Some DMT in older LP.LP also has WGR. Low fuel load. WUI. Scattered residual DF, WL, and LP over patchy regeneration of LP, DF, WL, ES, and AF. Some DMT in both WL and LP. MPB and WGR have affected LP. Some DF affected by RR. Fuel model is low, but plenty of ladder fuels. WUI. Few WL and DF over patchy regeneration, predominately LP with DF, ES, WL, and AF. Low fuel load. WUI. Variable unit with areas of WL, DF, and/or LP over LP, AF, WL, ES, and DF regeneration. Some remnant LP with MPB. DMT in some WL. RR. Low fuel load. WUI. Fill plant by hand with WL, WP, and PP. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical slash treatment. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical slash treatment. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical slash treatment. Pre-commercial thin by hand throughout stand. Lop and scatter slash. Pre-commercial thin, via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical slash treatment. Fill plant where needed. Restore the site by re-establishing long-lived seral species. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Remove DMT infected LP. Favor WL and DF for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Remove DMTinfected LP. Favor WL and DF for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Remove DMTinfected LP. Favor healthy WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL and DF for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor healthy WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Fill plant holes with WL, WP, and/or PP. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH WP BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY SCO W M B, SCO W M B, SCO W M B, SCO W M SCO W M, WP B, SCO Appendix A-17

18 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Variable unit with areas of WL, DF, and/or LP over LP, AF, and DF regeneration. Low fuel load. WUI. Sparsely regenerated stand. Few overstory trees. Low fuel load. WUI. Mixed-conifer WL, LP, DF, and AF. WL has heavy DMT. RR affecting DF. MPB has affected LP. Moderate to high fuel loading. WUI. Scattered residual WL (predominate), DF, GF, AF, and LP over patchy regeneration of predominate LP, with DF, WL, and AF. Some WL and LP infected by DMT. Some DF affected by RR. WSBW affecting the understory. Fuel load is low, but plenty of ladder fuels. WUI. Scattered residual WL and LP over patchy regeneration of predominately LP, with DF, WL, and AF. Some WL and LP infected by DMT. Fuel load is low, but plenty of ladder fuels. WUI. Jocko Trail near east side of unit. Pre-commercial thin, via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical slash treatment. Broadcast burn. Fill plant where needed Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, thinning throughout unit. WTY. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical slash treatment. Improvement cut via ground-based, mechanized equipment, mainly precommercial thinning throughout unit. Mechanical. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor healthy WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Reduce fuel load, stimulate aspen regeneration, and prepare site for planting. Restock site with longlived seral species - WL, PP, and/or WPBR resistant WP. Maintain overstory for structural diversity. overall stand removing insect and diseased trees and making it more resilient to those insect and diseases. Favor healthy WL and DF for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Remove DMTinfected LP. Favor healthy WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Remove DMTinfected LP. Favor healthy WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY W M B, SCO QA, Sh WP SCO W M C W M B, SCO W SE M B, SCO Appendix A-18

19 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Few scattered WL and DF over patchy regeneration of LP, DF, WL, and AF. Fuel load is low. WUI. Jocko Trail cuts through unit. Few healthy WL sparsely scattered over top sparsely regenerated stand of LP, WL, DF, and AF. Low fuel load. WUI. Few healthy WL sparsely scattered over top sparsely regenerated stand of LP, DF, and AF. Some DMT in overstory WL. Low fuel load. WUI. Scattered WL, PP, and DF over sparsely regenerated stand of LP, DF, and WL. RR affecting DF. Low fuel load. WUI. Scattered WL and DF over sparsely regenerated stand of predominately LP with minor amounts of DF, AF, ES, and WL. Low fuel load. WUI. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical/pile. Broadcast burn. Fill plant where needed. Broadcast burn. Fill plant where needed. Broadcast burn. Fill Plant where needed. Broadcast burn. Fill plant where needed. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Reduce fuel load, stimulate aspen regeneration, and prepare site for planting. Restock site with longlived seral species WL and WPBR-resistant WP. Maintain overstory WL for structural diversity. Reduce fuel load, stimulate aspen regeneration, and prepare site for planting. Restock site with longlived seral species WL and WPBR-resistant WP. Maintain healthy overstory WL for structural diversity. Reduce fuel load, stimulate aspen regeneration, and prepare site for planting. Restock site with longlived seral species WL, PP, and/or WPBR resistant WP. Maintain healthy overstory for structural diversity. Reduce fuel load, stimulate aspen regeneration, and prepare site for planting. Restock site with longlived seral species WL, PP, and/or WPBR resistant WP. Maintain healthy overstory for structural diversity. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY W M B, SCO QA, Sh M, WP SCO QA, Sh M, WP SCO QA, Sh M, WP SCO QA, Sh M, WP SCO Appendix A-19

20 UNIT PROPOSED MA ACRES APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS TABLE A-1. VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY FOR ALTERNATIVE 2. PURPOSE AND NEED ALT C C C 11 EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED TREATMENT OBJECTIVES Scattered WL and LP over dense regeneration of LP and WL. High fuel load. WUI. Few widely scattered WL over predominately LP regeneration with minor amounts of WL, WP, DF, and AF. Some DMT in overstory WL. Fuel load is low. Jocko Trail along west boundary. Mixed-conifer dominated by LP with WL and DF (minor component of ES and AF, as well). There is a large-tree component of widely scattered WL. Evidence of older MPB attacks. Fuel load is low to medium. Jocko Trail along west side. Crystal Lake Trail in south end of unit. Mixed-conifer of LP, DF, and PP. There is a large-tree component of scattered PP and DF. LP affected by MPB and SPM. WSBW affecting understory DF and AF. Fuel loading moderate. Mixed-conifer of LP, DF, and PP. There is a large-tree component of scattered PP and DF. LP affected by MPB and SPM. WSBW affecting understory DF and AF. Fuel loading moderate. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical slash treatment. Pre-commercial thin via groundbased, mechanized equipment, throughout unit. Mechanical slash treatment. Seed tree with reserves via groundbased, mechanized equipment. WTY. Plant PP, WL, and WPBRresistant WP. Improvement cut via ground-based mechanical equipment, thinning throughout stand. Daylight around large tree component WL. WTY. Improvement cut via skyline equipment, thinning throughout stand. Daylight around large-tree component WL. WTY. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor WL for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. overall stand making it more resilient to MPB. Favor health WL and WP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Initiate regeneration to improve overall health and vigor, and reestablish PP, WL, and WPBRresistant WP. Reduce fuel load, and promote shrub and huckleberry production. Maintain large-diameter WL to provide for structural diversity. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor PP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. Maintain large-tree component. overall stand, making it more resilient to MPB. Favor PP for retention. Reduce ladder fuels and fuel load. REDUCE RISK OF UNCHARAC- TERISTIC WILDFIRE FISH & WILDLIFE HABITAT FOREST HEALTH BENEFIT LOCAL ECONOMY W M B, SCO Sh M LT, R, WP B, SCO B, C, SCO SE LT, M B, C SE LT, M C Appendix A-20

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatments

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatments Appendix A: Vegetation Treatments In general, the proposed actions for the Light Restoration project focuses on establishing the composition, structure, pattern, and ecological processes necessary to make

More information

Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response

Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response Treatment objectives within the matrix are a combination of objectives for silvicultural, fuels,

More information

Big Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action

Big Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action Big Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action Project Background and 2014 Farm Bill The Big Hill Insect and Disease project on the Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District of the Salmon-Challis National

More information

Dear Interested Party,

Dear Interested Party, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Gunnison Ranger District 216 N Colorado St. Gunnison, CO 81230 Voice: 970-641-0471 TDD: 970-641-6817 File Code: 1950-1/2430 Date: June 8, 2010 Dear

More information

Acres within Planning Area. Total Acres Burned

Acres within Planning Area. Total Acres Burned Calf-Copeland Project Description Figure 1: Dead sugar pine in the Calf-Copeland planning area. Sugar pine grow best in open conditions. In the absence of fire disturbance, high densities of Douglas-fir

More information

Appendix J-1 Marking Guidelines Alternative 4 GTR 220

Appendix J-1 Marking Guidelines Alternative 4 GTR 220 Appendix J-1 Marking Guidelines Alternative 4 GTR 220 General Principles The Alternative 4 of the KREW Project is implementing the landscape, ecological vision of An Ecosystem Management Strategy for Sierran

More information

Dwarf Mistletoe Biology and Management in Southeast Region

Dwarf Mistletoe Biology and Management in Southeast Region Dwarf Mistletoe Biology and Management in Southeast Region Louis Halloin February 2003 Dwarf mistletoe is a parasitic plant native to western forests. It depends on its host for water and nutrients. Mistletoe

More information

Prescribed Fire Prescription 1. MP: 43 ac UB: 167 ac Landings: 21

Prescribed Fire Prescription 1. MP: 43 ac UB: 167 ac Landings: 21 Appendix A: Proposed Thinning and Prescribed Fire Treatments This appendix contains parameters and prescriptions applicable to proposed commercial and non-commercial thinning treatments and prescribed

More information

Clara Unit Card. Alternative 2 Acres: 19 Treatment Acres: 6 Stand Age: 106 Primary ELT: 16. Primary Treatment: Single-Tree Selection

Clara Unit Card. Alternative 2 Acres: 19 Treatment Acres: 6 Stand Age: 106 Primary ELT: 16. Primary Treatment: Single-Tree Selection Unit: 7-013-014 Total BA: 62 Forest Type: Quaking Aspen New Forest Type: Aspen/W.Spruce/Fir Primary Treatment: Single-Tree Selection Acres: 19 Treatment Acres: 6 Stand Age: 106 Primary ELT: 16 Treatment

More information

SILVICULTURE SILVICULTURE 10/8/2018. Ecological forestry (Ecosystem management)

SILVICULTURE SILVICULTURE 10/8/2018. Ecological forestry (Ecosystem management) SILVICULTURE SILVICULTURE Dave Peterson University of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences Thanks to Kristi McClelland, Boyd Evison, and Greg Ettl Silviculture The science and art of

More information

Prescribed Fire Prescription 1. MP: 43 ac UB: 167 ac Landings: 21

Prescribed Fire Prescription 1. MP: 43 ac UB: 167 ac Landings: 21 Appendix A: Proposed Thinning and Prescribed Fire Treatments This appendix contains parameters and prescriptions applicable to proposed commercial and non-commercial thinning treatments and prescribed

More information

BOISE FOREST COALITION MEETING BOGUS BASIN UPDATE

BOISE FOREST COALITION MEETING BOGUS BASIN UPDATE BOISE FOREST COALITION MEETING BOGUS BASIN UPDATE WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 S. Walnut, Boise, Idaho Trophy Room October 15, 2015 Facilitators, Dick Gardner and Jim

More information

Hyde Park Hyde Park Wildland Urban Interface Project. Scoping Information February 2017

Hyde Park Hyde Park Wildland Urban Interface Project. Scoping Information February 2017 Introduction The Santa Fe National Forest is working as part of the Greater Santa Fe Fireshed Coalition (GSFF) to change conditions across a landscape critical to the vitality of our communities. The GSFF

More information

Supplemental Silviculture Report for Cold Canal Vegetation Project Wallowa-Whitman N.F. Wallowa Valley Ranger District

Supplemental Silviculture Report for Cold Canal Vegetation Project Wallowa-Whitman N.F. Wallowa Valley Ranger District Supplemental Silviculture Report for Cold Canal Vegetation Project Wallowa-Whitman N.F. Wallowa Valley Ranger District Location: T03S-R45&46E-Multiple Sections County: Wallowa Fifth Field Watershed: Lower

More information

3.14 VISUAL RESOURCE (SCENERY)

3.14 VISUAL RESOURCE (SCENERY) 3.14 VISUAL RESOURCE (SCENERY) 3.14.1 INTRODUCTION The Lower West Fork analysis area lies in the Bitterroot Mountain Range and is bisected by the West Fork Road (State Highway 473). The Lower West Fork

More information

Appendix J. Forest Plan Amendments. Salvage Recovery Project

Appendix J. Forest Plan Amendments. Salvage Recovery Project Forest Plan Amendments Salvage Recovery Project APPENDIX J Lynx and Old Growth Forest Plan Amendments CHANGES BETWEEN DRAFT EIS AND FINAL EIS Changes in Appendix J between the Draft and Final EIS include:

More information

ROCK CREEK FUELS AND VEGETATION PROJECT FORESTED VEGETATION ANALYSIS Karl Fuelling 9/18/2015

ROCK CREEK FUELS AND VEGETATION PROJECT FORESTED VEGETATION ANALYSIS Karl Fuelling 9/18/2015 ROCK CREEK FUELS AND VEGETATION PROJECT FORESTED VEGETATION ANALYSIS Karl Fuelling 9/18/2015 CURRENT CONDITIONS The vegetation analysis for the Rock Creek project has been done using Arcmap with Vegetation,

More information

Walton Lake Restoration Project

Walton Lake Restoration Project Walton Lake Restoration Project Fire and Fuels Specialist Report, February 2017 Ochoco National Forest Lookout Mtn. Ranger District Barry Kleckler Fuels Specialist, Prairie Division, Central Oregon Fire

More information

3.15 SNAG AND SNAG ASSOCIATED SPECIES

3.15 SNAG AND SNAG ASSOCIATED SPECIES 3.15 SNAG AND SNAG ASSOCIATED SPECIES 3.15.1 Scope of the Analysis Snags play an important role in creating biodiversity on the landscape. They provide holes that are homes for birds and small mammals,

More information

File Code: 1950 Date: March 22, 2011

File Code: 1950 Date: March 22, 2011 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Mt. Hood National Forest Barlow Ranger District 780 NE Court Street Dufur, OR 97021 541-467-2291 FAX 541-467-2271 File Code: 1950 Date: March 22,

More information

Dear Interested Party:

Dear Interested Party: United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest 420 Barrett Street Dillon, MT 59725 406 683-3900 File Code: 1950 Date: June 7, 2011 Dear Interested Party: Thank

More information

Vestal Project Proposed Action Hell Canyon Ranger District Black Hills National Forest April 2011

Vestal Project Proposed Action Hell Canyon Ranger District Black Hills National Forest April 2011 Vestal Project Proposed Action Hell Canyon Ranger District Black Hills National Forest April 2011 Introduction: The Vestal Project area is located surrounding the city of Custer, South Dakota within Custer

More information

Whitebark Pine Restoration:

Whitebark Pine Restoration: Whitebark Pine Restoration: You have to crack some eggs to make an omelette Endangered Species Act Status - USA USFS Sensitive Species Status Framework for Restoration and Management Steve Shelly and R1

More information

ATTACHMENT 4: DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TYPES MESABI PROJECT

ATTACHMENT 4: DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TYPES MESABI PROJECT ATTACHMENT 4: DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TYPES MESABI PROJECT Treatment Description Photo Example Create young forest with harvest Primary Treatments Two Age Cut Harvest is designed to maintain and regenerate

More information

Black Spruce- Lowland. Tower Birch Clearcut-w/Reserves Adjacent 6/5/2019

Black Spruce- Lowland. Tower Birch Clearcut-w/Reserves Adjacent 6/5/2019 Minnesota Department of Natural Resource Division of Forestry 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4044 February 08, 2018 Notice of Annual Plan Additions Fiscal Year 2019 Harvest Plan Addition 4 This

More information

Outlook Landscape Diversity Project

Outlook Landscape Diversity Project Appendix D. Vegetation Landscape Diversity Project Prepared by: Lisa Helmig Forest Silviculturist for: Middle Fork Ranger District Willamette National Forest June 1, 2015 Appendix D Table 1 Integrated

More information

Stand Dynamics and Health. Helping Your Woods Grow. For most of us this is our goal. Traditional Land Knowledge. Forest Function and Wildlife Habitat

Stand Dynamics and Health. Helping Your Woods Grow. For most of us this is our goal. Traditional Land Knowledge. Forest Function and Wildlife Habitat Helping Your Woods Grow the art and science of silviculture Stand Dynamics and Health Kristi McClelland, King County DNRP Forester http://cru.cahe.wsu.edu/cepublications/eb2000/eb2000.pdf Photo by John

More information

Twins Project Scoping Report

Twins Project Scoping Report Twins Project Scoping Report Table of Contents Page I. Introduction 1 II. Purpose of and Need for Action 1 A. Landscape Ecosystem/Management Indicator 4 Habitat B. Spatial Patterns 6 C. Additional Wildlife

More information

Mapping Mountain Pine Beetle and White Pine Blister Rust in White Bark Pine on the Helena National Forest

Mapping Mountain Pine Beetle and White Pine Blister Rust in White Bark Pine on the Helena National Forest Numbered Report 06-05 March 2006 Mapping Mountain Beetle and White Blister Rust in White Bark on the Helena National Forest Introduction Nancy Sturdevant, Entomologist USDA Forest Service, Forest Health

More information

Bemidji Aspen Clearcut-Artificial Regen Cooperation 1/11/2019

Bemidji Aspen Clearcut-Artificial Regen Cooperation 1/11/2019 Minnesota Department of Natural Resource Division of Forestry 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4044 December 14, 2018 Notice of Annual Plan Additions Fiscal Year 2019 Harvest Plan Addition No. 3 This

More information

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatment Descriptions and Unit Specific Design Criteria

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatment Descriptions and Unit Specific Design Criteria Appendix A: Vegetation Treatment Descriptions and Unit Specific Design Criteria The table below describes the Kabetogama Project proposed vegetation treatments associated with Alternative 2. The treatment

More information

Whitebark Pine Restoration: You have to crack some eggs to make an omelette

Whitebark Pine Restoration: You have to crack some eggs to make an omelette Whitebark Pine Restoration: You have to crack some eggs to make an omelette o Whitebark Pine in Region 1 o Endangered Species Act Status USA o USFS Sensitive Species Status o NEPA Framework for Restoration

More information

Nez Perce National Forest Moose Creek Ranger District

Nez Perce National Forest Moose Creek Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Nez Perce National Forest Moose Creek Ranger District 831 Selway Road Kooskia, ID 83539 208 926-4258 TTY 208 926-7725 File Code: 1950 Date: Dec 30,

More information

Rock Creek Fuels and Vegetation Project

Rock Creek Fuels and Vegetation Project United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service November 2014 Rock Creek Fuels and Vegetation Project Minidoka Ranger District, Sawtooth National Forest Cassia and Twin Falls Counties, Idaho Image

More information

Intermountain Adaptation Partnership. Pat Behrens, USFS Intermountain Region

Intermountain Adaptation Partnership. Pat Behrens, USFS Intermountain Region Pat Behrens, USFS Intermountain Region Direct effects altered vegetation growth, mortality, and regeneration Indirect effects through altered disturbance and interactions with altered ecosystem processes

More information

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest I. Introduction The Laurentian Ranger District of the Superior National Forest is proposing management activities within

More information

Reduce Hazardous Fuels in the McKenzie Bridge Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI)

Reduce Hazardous Fuels in the McKenzie Bridge Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) The McKenzie River Ranger District is proposing to provide a sustainable supply of timber products, reduce hazardous fuels in the McKenzie Bridge Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI), and actively manage stands

More information

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS Developed Recreation/Trails, Wilderness & Roadless Jasper Mountain Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forest Description of the

More information

Sheppard Creek Post-Fire Project

Sheppard Creek Post-Fire Project Flathead National Forest Tally Lake Ranger District Sheppard Creek Post-Fire Project Purpose of the Project and Proposed Action December 14, 2007 This document presents information about the Brush Creek

More information

Forsythe II Project. September 2015

Forsythe II Project. September 2015 Forsythe II Project September 2015 The Boulder Ranger District (BRD) of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests is proposing vegetation treatments on 3,840 acres of National Forest System (NFS) lands

More information

BUCK 13 TIMBER SALE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA# OR

BUCK 13 TIMBER SALE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA# OR BUCK 13 TIMBER SALE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA# OR-014-07-02 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAKEVIEW DISTRICT - Klamath Falls Resource Area ABSTRACT: The following

More information

Proposed treatments of planted white pine in the Waynesville Watershed

Proposed treatments of planted white pine in the Waynesville Watershed Proposed treatments of planted white pine in the Waynesville Watershed Peter Bates and Rob Lamb in collaboration with The Waynesville Watershed Advisory Committee September 14, 2010 Presentation overview

More information

Chapter 1: Purpose and Need for Action and Proposed Action

Chapter 1: Purpose and Need for Action and Proposed Action Chapter 1: Purpose and Need for Action and Proposed Action Introduction The Goosenest Ranger District of the Klamath National Forest (KNF) is proposing a habitat restoration project on 2,226 acres in a

More information

SULPHUR TIMBER STAND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

SULPHUR TIMBER STAND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SULPHUR TIMBER STAND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED The overarching purpose of the Sulphur Timber Stand Improvement Project is to improve the overall health and vigor of immature lodgepole pine stands,

More information

Landscape-level biomass opportunities

Landscape-level biomass opportunities Forest insect and disease management: Implications for biomass production Outline Landscape-level opportunities Historic or mappable agents Invasive pests on the horizon Site-level opportunities By species/

More information

Dear Interested Party;

Dear Interested Party; United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Caribou-Targhee National Forest Curlew National Grassland Westside Ranger District 4350 Cliffs Drive Pocatello, ID 83204 (208) 236-7500 File Code:

More information

Ecology and Management of Eastern Oregon Forests

Ecology and Management of Eastern Oregon Forests Manual 12 May 2005 $25.00 Ecology and Management of Eastern Oregon Forests A COMPREHENSIVE MANUAL FOR FOREST MANAGERS Manual 12 May 2005 Ecology and Management of Eastern Oregon Forests A COMPREHENSIVE

More information

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis 1 Medicine Lake Caldera Vegetation Treatment Project Scenic Report Prepared by: /s/gary Kedish Natural Resources Specialist for: Big Valley and Doublehead Ranger Districts Modoc National Forest February

More information

Riparian Forest Ecology & Management. Derek Churchill, Nov 8, 2014

Riparian Forest Ecology & Management. Derek Churchill, Nov 8, 2014 Riparian Forest Ecology & Management Derek Churchill, Nov 8, 2014 Outline 1. Importance of Riparian Zones 2. Watersheds & Stream Type 3. Forest Stream Interactions 4. Riparian forest types & development

More information

Boulder Ranger District

Boulder Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Boulder Ranger District 2140 Yarmouth Avenue Boulder, CO 80301-1615 Voice: (303) 541-2500 Web: www.fs.usda.gov/arp Fax: (303) 541-2515 File Code:

More information

Lower Priest Project

Lower Priest Project Forest Vegetation Report Prepared by: A.J. Helgenberg Forester for: Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forests October 23, 2012 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination

More information

Nov 7, 2011 Re: Current Conditions in Lodgepole Pine Stands on the Black Hills; RCSC-02-12

Nov 7, 2011 Re: Current Conditions in Lodgepole Pine Stands on the Black Hills; RCSC-02-12 Nov 7, 2011 Re: Current Conditions in Lodgepole Pine Stands on the Black Hills; RCSC-02-12 To: Forest Supervisor, Black Hills Cc: Blaine Cook, Black Hills NF SO, Susan Gray, R-2 RO Kurt Allen and James

More information

1. Protect against wildfires 2. Enhance wildlife habitat 3. Protect watersheds 4. Restore plant communities. Ford Ridge Project Area (pre-treatment)

1. Protect against wildfires 2. Enhance wildlife habitat 3. Protect watersheds 4. Restore plant communities. Ford Ridge Project Area (pre-treatment) OVERVIEW Ford Ridge is a multi-stage project planned and coordinated utilizing indepth scientific research and best management practices. Project implementation began in the spring of 2015, with additional

More information

UNEVEN-AGED MANAGEMENT NORTHWEST CERTIFIED FORESTRY

UNEVEN-AGED MANAGEMENT NORTHWEST CERTIFIED FORESTRY UNEVEN-AGED MANAGEMENT NORTHWEST CERTIFIED FORESTRY Rolf Gersonde, 6/6/2015 Uneven-aged Management in 90 Minutes 2 Silviculture Background Forest Ecology Management Tools and Stocking Control Multi-aged

More information

3.1 Silviculture. Affected Environment. Regulatory Framework. Existing Condition

3.1 Silviculture. Affected Environment. Regulatory Framework. Existing Condition 3.1 Silviculture This section describes the vegetation resources in the Meadow Vapor project area in terms of: Existing forest condition and desired forest conditions Treatments to achieve desired conditions

More information

File Code: 1950 Date: November 17, 2015

File Code: 1950 Date: November 17, 2015 Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information United States Forest Deschutes National Forest 63095 Deschutes Market Road Department of Service Bend/Fort Rock Ranger District

More information

Appendix A Legacy Tree Guide

Appendix A Legacy Tree Guide Middle Fork Weiser River Landscape Restoration Project - Legacy Tree Guidelines Ponderosa Pine, Western Larch, and Douglas-fir Perry and Amaranthus (1997) defined forest legacies as anything handed down

More information

Red Pine Management Guide A handbook to red pine management in the North Central Region

Red Pine Management Guide A handbook to red pine management in the North Central Region Red Pine Management Guide A handbook to red pine management in the North Central Region This guide is also available online at: http://ncrs.fs.fed.us/fmg/nfgm/rp A cooperative project of: North Central

More information

What to do with a 60 + year old unmanaged red pine stand?

What to do with a 60 + year old unmanaged red pine stand? What to do with a 60 + year old unmanaged red pine stand? Background Red pine (Pinus resinosa) was extensively planted in the early parts of the 20 th century on abandoned agricultural land to control

More information

The Regeneration of Aspen Stands in Southern Utah

The Regeneration of Aspen Stands in Southern Utah The Regeneration of Aspen Stands in Southern Utah By: Justin Britton, Justin DeRose, James Long, Karen Mock, Darren McAvoy Background Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) is an important species in southern

More information

Forsythe II Project Proposed Action

Forsythe II Project Proposed Action The Boulder Ranger District (BRD) of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests (ARNF) is proposing management activities on 3,901 acres of National Forest System (NFS) lands within the Forsythe II project

More information

Response of Secondary Stand Structure Report

Response of Secondary Stand Structure Report Response of Secondary Stand Structure Report For FIA/FSP Project: Y091188 Prepared by: Kyle Runzer Nicole Balliet Chris Hawkins April, 2009 The objectives of this study were to: (1) identify stands that

More information

Elkhorn Project Proposed Action

Elkhorn Project Proposed Action Elkhorn Project Proposed Action PROJECT LOCATION The Elkhorn project area is defined by the Cache la Poudre River and Highway 14 to the south, the Manhattan Road (CR 69) to the east, the Deadman Road to

More information

Group Selection Cutting in Mature Douglas-fir Forests

Group Selection Cutting in Mature Douglas-fir Forests Group Selection Cutting in Mature Douglas-fir Forests Tristan Huff Group selection is a way to partially emulate older forest structure while still allowing for significant timber production. Under this

More information

Appendix A (Project Specifications) Patton Mill Fuel Break Project

Appendix A (Project Specifications) Patton Mill Fuel Break Project Appendix A (Project Specifications) Patton Mill Fuel Break Project I. Proposed Actions: A. Construct a Fuel Break (approximately 5 miles, about 120 acres): The fuel break is located along a segment of

More information

La Grande Ranger District

La Grande Ranger District La Grande Ranger District Wallowa-Whitman National Forest 3502 Highway 30, La Grande, OR. 97850 (541) 963-7186 January 15, 2015 Dear Forest User: The La Grande Ranger District has recently completed a

More information

Walla Walla Ranger District

Walla Walla Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Walla Walla Ranger District 1415 West Rose Walla Walla, WA 99362 509-522-6290 File Code: 1950 Date: September 30, 2014 Dear Forest User: The Walla

More information

Decision Memo for Pax Ponderosa Pine Planting Project

Decision Memo for Pax Ponderosa Pine Planting Project Decision Memo for Pax Ponderosa Pine Planting Project USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Fremont-Winema National Forests Lakeview Ranger District Lake County, Oregon Introduction The Lakeview

More information

Medicine Bow Landscape Vegetation Analysis (LaVA) Cooperating Agency Meeting March 6, :30 a.m. 12:30 p.m.

Medicine Bow Landscape Vegetation Analysis (LaVA) Cooperating Agency Meeting March 6, :30 a.m. 12:30 p.m. Medicine Bow Landscape Vegetation Analysis (LaVA) Cooperating Agency Meeting March 6, 2017 9:30 a.m. 12:30 p.m. Condition-based NEPA A Cutting-edge Analysis Approach What it s Not What it Is How it Works

More information

Kurtis Robins District Ranger US Forest Service 138 S Main

Kurtis Robins District Ranger US Forest Service 138 S Main United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Fishlake National Forest Fax: (435) 836-2366 138 S Main, PO Box 129 Loa, UT 84747 Phone: (435) 836-2811 File Code: 1950 Date: April 5, 2011 Kurtis

More information

Reading Project Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Hat Creek Ranger District Lassen National Forest April 3, 2013

Reading Project Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Hat Creek Ranger District Lassen National Forest April 3, 2013 Reading Project Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Hat Creek Ranger District Lassen National Forest April 3, 2013 Prepared By: /s/ Tim Kellison Date: 05-31-2013 Tim Kellison Assistant Forest Botanist Reviewed

More information

PIPESTONE TIMBER SALE AND RESTORATION PROJECT RECORD OF DECISION

PIPESTONE TIMBER SALE AND RESTORATION PROJECT RECORD OF DECISION PIPESTONE TIMBER SALE AND RESTORATION PROJECT RECORD OF DECISION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MY DECISION... 2 II. OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT AREA... 3 III. OVERVIEW OF OUR ANALYSIS AND DECISION

More information

Forest Stewardship Plan

Forest Stewardship Plan Forest Stewardship Plan Effective plan date: June 1, 2002 Forestry is the art and science of managing forest lands and their related resources, including trees and other plants, animals, soil, water, and

More information

Silviculture Art & science of establishing & tending trees & forests

Silviculture Art & science of establishing & tending trees & forests Silviculture Art & science of establishing & tending trees & forests Karen Bennett, karen.bennett@unh.edu Extension Forestry Professor & Specialist Presented to NH Coverts, May 2015 Silviculture Actions

More information

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles Preamble These principles were collaboratively developed by a team of dedicated professionals representing industry, conservation organizations, land management

More information

Appendix D. Design Features, Monitoring and Mitigation for East Fork Meadow Creek Alternative 2- South. Design Features D-1

Appendix D. Design Features, Monitoring and Mitigation for East Fork Meadow Creek Alternative 2- South. Design Features D-1 Appendix D Design Features, Monitoring and Mitigation for East Fork Meadow Creek Alternative 2- South Design Features The following specific criteria must be applied during project implementation if either

More information

Pacific Southwest Region

Pacific Southwest Region United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Regional Office, R5 1323 Club Drive Vallejo, CA 94592 (707) 562-8737 Voice (707) 562-9130 Text (TDD) File Code: 1570-1 Date:

More information

Why do we need a forest ecosystem management plan? Why would we cut down any trees? NHHP FORESTS. Presented by Frank Stricklin, NHHP Steward

Why do we need a forest ecosystem management plan? Why would we cut down any trees? NHHP FORESTS. Presented by Frank Stricklin, NHHP Steward Why do we need a forest ecosystem management plan? Why would we cut down any trees? NHHP FORESTS Presented by Frank Stricklin, NHHP Steward NHHP FOREST STEWARDSHIP Ecosystem management is an approach that

More information

Appendix 1 Hood River Stewardship Crew Collaborative Recommendations

Appendix 1 Hood River Stewardship Crew Collaborative Recommendations Appendix 1 Hood River Stewardship Crew Collaborative Recommendations July 24, 2014 Hood River Collaborative Stew Crew Objectives/Priorities: Protect the integrity of and access to recreational trails and

More information

Appendix C. Consistency With Eastside Screens. Salvage Recovery Project

Appendix C. Consistency With Eastside Screens. Salvage Recovery Project Consistency With Eastside Screens Salvage Recovery Project APPENDIX C Consistency of Forest Vegetation Proposed Actions With Eastside Screens (Forest Plan amendment #11) CHANGES BETWEEN DRAFT EIS AND FINAL

More information

United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Region. Wallowa-Whitman National Forest

United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Region. Wallowa-Whitman National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Blue Mountains Pest Management Service Center Factors Affecting Survival of Fire Injured

More information

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS SCENIC QUALITY Jasper Mountain Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forest Description of the Proposed Action Vegetation management,

More information

Telegraph Forest Management Project

Telegraph Forest Management Project Telegraph Forest Management Project Black Hills National Forest Northern Hills Ranger District Lawrence and Pennington Counties, South Dakota Proposed Action and Request for Comments March 2008 Table of

More information

Silviculture/Timber Specialist Report For Jim Lewis

Silviculture/Timber Specialist Report For Jim Lewis Silviculture/Timber Specialist Report For Jim Lewis Author: Kathryn A. Wallace Date: August 31, 2010 /s/ Kathryn A. Wallace Certified Silviculturist 1. Condition Existing Condition: The Sacramento Mountains

More information

Wildlife Conservation Strategy

Wildlife Conservation Strategy Wildlife Conservation Strategy Boise National Forest What is the Wildlife Conservation Strategy? The Boise National Forest is developing a Wildlife Conservation Strategy (WCS) in accordance with its Land

More information

Taylor Hellroaring Project

Taylor Hellroaring Project United States Department of Agriculture Taylor Hellroaring Project Environmental Assessment Forest Service Flathead National Forest Tally Lake Ranger District January 2018 Environmental Assessment Flathead

More information

The Science Behind Forest Riparian Protection in the Pacific Northwest States By George Ice, Summer 2004

The Science Behind Forest Riparian Protection in the Pacific Northwest States By George Ice, Summer 2004 The Science Behind Forest Riparian Protection in the Pacific Northwest States By George Ice, Summer 2004 Riparian buffers, streamside management zones, and similar measures are essential parts of forest

More information

Low-intensity fire burning on the forest floor. High-intensity crown fire

Low-intensity fire burning on the forest floor. High-intensity crown fire Forest Fires: Answers to 12 Common Questions 1. Is wildfire bad for forests? No. Some forests need fire to be healthy, but it has to be the type of fire that the forest evolved with. Low-intensity fire

More information

Dear Interested Party,

Dear Interested Party, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Idaho Panhandle National Forest Coeur d'alene River Ranger District P. O. Box 159 Smelterville, ID 83868 2502 East Sherman Avenue Coeur d' Alene,

More information

Nautilus Project. Final Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix B. Silvicultural Findings of Compliance with Laws, Regulations and Policy

Nautilus Project. Final Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix B. Silvicultural Findings of Compliance with Laws, Regulations and Policy Appendix B Silvicultural Findings of Compliance with Laws, Regulations and Policy This page intentionally left blank. Appendix B Silvicultural Findings of Compliance with Laws, Regulations and Policy B

More information

Treatment/Project Area: Blanco Basin

Treatment/Project Area: Blanco Basin Treatment/Project Area: Blanco Basin rev. 4/15/11 Geographic Area - Bounded on north by watershed divide between Rito Blanco and Rio Blanco (Blue Mtn and Winter Hills make up western half of divide), the

More information

Southern Rowe Mesa Restoration Project. Scoping Report

Southern Rowe Mesa Restoration Project. Scoping Report Southern Rowe Mesa Restoration Project Scoping Report Purpose and Need The purpose of this project is to promote a mosaic of healthy forest stands and natural grasslands on approximately 17,500 acres on

More information

DECISION NOTICE, FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT, and FINDING OF NON-SIGNIFICANT AMENDMENT for the

DECISION NOTICE, FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT, and FINDING OF NON-SIGNIFICANT AMENDMENT for the DECISION NOTICE, FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT, and FINDING OF NON-SIGNIFICANT AMENDMENT for the LOWER SHEEP TIMBER SALE and FIRE REINTRODUCTION PROJECT USDA Forest Service Umatilla National Forest

More information

File Code: 1950 Date: July 23, Greetings,

File Code: 1950 Date: July 23, Greetings, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Angeles National Forest Santa Clara/Mojave Rivers Ranger Districts 30800 Boquet Canyon Rd. Saugus, CA 91350 661-296-9710 Voice 626 447-8992 TTY File

More information

Future Forest Conditions

Future Forest Conditions Future Forest Conditions Claudia Regan Regional Vegetation Ecologist USFS Rocky Mountain Region cregan@fs.fed.us Acknowledgements Missy Dressen, Polly Hays, Greg Hayward, Don Vandendriesche, Kristen Pelz,

More information

Forest Composition and Structure

Forest Composition and Structure C H A P T E R 3 Forest Composition and Structure Chippewa Plains/Pine Moraines and Outwash Plains Subsections Part 1 3.1 Forest Cover-Type on State Land Administered by DNR Forestry and Wildlife Chippewa

More information

Forest Health Highlights 2015

Forest Health Highlights 2015 Forest Health Highlights 2015 Windbreaks, shelterbelts and narrow wooded riparian strips account for an additional 423,000 acres of tree-covered land. Community forests add 470,000 acres to the state s

More information

Starry Goat Project Proposed Action

Starry Goat Project Proposed Action anlogo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information United States Forest Kootenai National Forest 12858 US Highway 2 Department of Service Troy, MT 59935-8750 Agriculture 406-295-4693

More information

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles Preamble Participants Principles Collaborate Reduce the threat of unnatural crown fire.

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles Preamble Participants Principles Collaborate Reduce the threat of unnatural crown fire. New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles Preamble These principles were collaboratively developed by a team of dedicated professionals representing industry, conservation organizations, land management

More information

RESOURCES PRACTICES BRANCH

RESOURCES PRACTICES BRANCH RESOURCES PRACTICES BRANCH Silviculture Facts Summary Charts and Graphs March 216 Data Sources This publication s sourced data is based on primarily Reporting Silviculture Updates and Land Status Tracking

More information