RESOLUTION NO. 14- The City Council of the City of Goleta does resolve as follows:

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "RESOLUTION NO. 14- The City Council of the City of Goleta does resolve as follows:"

Basil Baker
5 years ago
Views:

1 ATTACHMENT 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOLETA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GOLETA GENERAL PLAN CERTIFIED ON OCTOBER 2, 2006 (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO ) AND ADOPT A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE VILLAGE AT LOS CARNEROS PROJECT. 1

2 RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOLETA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GOLETA GENERAL PLAN CERTIFIED ON OCTOBER 2, 2006 (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO ) AND ADOPT A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE VILLAGE AT LOS CARNEROS PROJECT. CASE NUMBER GPA The City Council of the City of Goleta does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares that: A. On March 23, 2010, CHA McKinley, Goleta LLC was the property owner of Lots 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and Los Carneros Business Park LP was the property owner of Lots 1 and 3, legally described as Parcel One of Map 14,500 filed in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Santa Barbara in Book, 185, Page 64 through 70 of Maps, County Assessor Parcel Numbers , 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, and 030. B. On March 23, 2010, CHA McKinley, Goleta LLC and Los Carneros Business Park LP, filed an application requesting initiation of a General Plan Amendment to remove Lots 4, 6 and 7 of Map 14,500 from the list of Central Hollister Affordable Housing Opportunity Sites on Figure 10A-2 (Sites Suitable for Residential Development and Location of Housing Opportunity Sites) of the General Plan Housing Element and a General Plan Amendment to Housing Element Subpolicy 11.6 (Inclusionary Requirement for Affordable Housing Opportunity Sites) to remove a reference to enumerated sites 24, 25, and 26, which correspond to these lots. C. The application was subsequently amended to include a request for two General Plan Amendments. The first General Plan Amendment requests minor changes to the General Plan Land Use Element, Figure 2-1, Land Use Plan Map for Land Use Designation changes to portions of 4 parcels (APN , 026, 027 and 028) from residential use to business park use totaling 1.89 acres and Land Use Designation changes to portions of 2 parcels (APN and 025) from business park use to residential use totaling 0.79 acres. The second additional General Plan Amendment request would reconcile the repeal of the Raytheon Specific Plan which requires minor revisions to the Land Use Element to eliminate reference to the Specific Plan in Subpolicy LU8.1 (Applicability) and Subpolicy LU 8.5 (Coordinated Development Plan and Quality Design). 2

3 D. On May 3, 2011, the City Council conducted a public hearing and initiated the Village at Los Carneros General Plan Amendments (the Project or GPA ). E. The City reviewed the Project s environmental impacts pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code 21000, et seq.), the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations 15000, et seq.), and the City s Environmental Guidelines (collectively, CEQA ). F. On October 2, 2006, the Goleta City Council adopted findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and certified the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH # , pursuant to CEQA via Resolution No and adopted the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan ( GP/CLUP ) via Resolution No The GP/CLUP was subsequently amended by various City Council actions as reflected in the administrative record. G. A CEQA Addendum is appropriate pursuant to CEQA Guidelines since minor changes and additions to the GP/CLUP FEIR are necessary to address the General Plan Amendments and no circumstances exist calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and H. The CEQA Addendum for the Village at Los Carneros Project General Plan Amendments (Case No GPA) dated February 7, 2014 ( Addendum ) attached as Exhibit No. 1 and incorporated by reference, was prepared in full compliance with CEQA. I. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on June 23, 2014 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard. J. After hearing public testimony the Planning Commission of the City of Goleta recommended adoption of the CEQA Addendum and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to the City Council. K. On July 15, 2014, the City Council of the City of Goleta held a duly noticed hearing at which time all persons wishing to offer testimony regarding the adequacy of the CEQA Addendum were heard. SECTION 2: Environmental Assessment. The City Council makes the following environmental findings: A. The GPA was analyzed for its environmental impacts and the Addendum was prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines An addendum is appropriate only if these minor technical changes or additions do not result 3

4 in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts B. The Addendum need not be circulated for public review (CEQA Guidelines 15164(c)). However, an addendum must be considered by the decisionmaking body before making a decision on the project (CEQA Guidelines 15164(d)). C. There is substantial evidence in the record showing that the Addendum is appropriate for the GPA. SECTION 3: Action. The City Council of the City of Goleta, California does hereby resolve as follows: A. Adopt the Addendum and mitigation monitoring and reporting program ( MMRP ) attached as Exhibit No., which is incorporated by reference, required by CEQA and CEQA Guidelines B. The policies and implementation actions set forth in the GP/CLUP EIR and the GP/CLUP and the approved project description and conditions of approval, with their corresponding permit monitoring requirements constitute the MMRP for the GPA. The MMRP is designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. C. Direct the Director of Planning and Environmental Review, or designee, to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of Santa Barbara within five (5) days of approving the Project, pursuant to CEQA and CEQA Guidelines SECTION 4: Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. SECTION 5: Limitations. The City Council s analysis and evaluation of the project is based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the project is the City Council s lack of knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made to form accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the City's ability to solve what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The City must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations inherent in that framework. 4

5 SECTION 6: Summaries of Information. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact SECTION 7: This Resolution will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent Resolution. SECTION 8: A copy of this Resolution must be mailed to CHA McKinley, Goleta LLC, Los Carneros Business Park LP and to any other person requesting a copy. The documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based, are in the custody of the City Clerk, City of Goleta, 130 Cremona Drive, Suite B, Goleta, California, SECTION 9: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, MICHAEL BENNETT, MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: DEBORAH LOPEZ CITY CLERK TIM W. GILES CITY ATTORNEY 5

6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA ) CITY OF GOLETA ) ss. I, DEBORAH LOPEZ, City Clerk of the City of Goleta, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 14- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Goleta at a regular meeting held on the 15 th day of July, 2014 by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: (SEAL) DEBORAH LOPEZ CITY CLERK 6

7 ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT 1 FINAL ADDENDUM TO THE GP/CLUP FEIR February, 2014 Distributed Separately Available at:

8 ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT 2 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE VILLAGE AT LOS CARNEROS PROJECT (CASE NO GPA)

9 Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program For The Village at Los Carneros Project (Case No GPA) Mitigation Measure Population and Housing Implemented By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting Action Mitigation Measure GPA 2-1: Any residential project that incorporates all or any portion thereof of Lots 4, 6 and 7 of Map 14,500, must provide a minimum of 69 (15 affordable units more than required by Subpolicy HE 11.5) affordable units to extremely low-, very low-, lowand moderate-income households. The affordable units may be for-sale units or rental units. An instrument, in a form approved by the City Attorney, must be executed and recorded against the property ensuring construction of the affordable housing and the maintenance of their affordability for a period of not less than 30 years. Permittee The Permittee must execute and record an instrument, in a form approved by the City Attorney, ensuring construction of the affordable housing and maintenance of their affordability for a period of not less than 30 years, before recordation of the final map. The Director of Planning and Environment al Review, or designee, must verify compliance with this requirement before final map recordation. 1

City of Los Alamitos

City of Los Alamitos Agenda Report March 21, 2016 Consent Calendar Item No: 8K To: Mayor Richard Murphy & Members of the City Council From: Mayor Pro Tem Hasselbrink & Council Member Kusumoto Subject: